The ๐˜™๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜š๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฅ ๐˜๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ (1952) and its revisions as a linear emergence of the Tyndaleโ€“King James Version tradition

dc.contributor.authorMiller-Naudรฉ, Cynthia L.
dc.contributor.authorNaudรฉ, Jacobus A.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-19T07:52:02Z
dc.date.available2024-08-19T07:52:02Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractRevisions of the ๐˜’๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜‘๐˜ข๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ of 1611 continued into the 20th and 21st centuries as literal or word-for-word translations. This development corresponds with a new age in Bible translation that started in the second half of the 20th century, which involves at least six changes in the philosophy of Bible translation. Firstly, Bible translation is characterised by interconfessional cooperation. Secondly, the plain meaning intended in the incipient texts is made accessible to readers. Thirdly, new critical editions of the Hebrew and Greek incipient texts on the basis of new discoveries of texts are utilised. Fourthly, there is the tendency to remove archaic language to make versions intelligible. Fifthly, there is a tendency to use gendered and inclusive language. Sixthly, the move is from print communication, which can be typified as typographic interpretive culture, to electronic or media communication, which can be typified as digital-media interpretive culture, where sound and visuality become prominent as a contextual supplement to words. In the analysis it will be determined which of these aspects are reflected in the๐˜™๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜š๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฅ ๐˜๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ and its revisions as part of the linear emergence of the Tyndaleโ€“King James Version tradition. However, unlike the ๐˜’๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜‘๐˜ข๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ, the ๐˜™๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜š๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฅ ๐˜๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ and its revisions failed to achieve widespread approval from satisfied readers, thus opening the door to alternative revisions. ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป: Instead of viewing the ๐˜™๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜š๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฅ ๐˜๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ and its revisions as new and independent from the Tyndaleโ€“King James Version tradition, it is demonstrated that they are a linear continuation of the emergence of the pre-20th century translation complex within this tradition without replicating the success of the King James Version.
dc.description.versionPublisher's version
dc.identifier.citationMiller-Naudรฉ, C. L., & Naudรฉ, J. A. (2022). The Revised Standard Version (1952) and its revisions as a linear emergence of the Tyndaleโ€“King James Version tradition. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 78(1), a7647. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v78i1.7647
dc.identifier.issn0259-9422 (print)
dc.identifier.issn2072-8050 (online)
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v78i1.7647
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11660/12745
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAOSIS Publishing
dc.rights.holderAuthor(s)
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectKing James Version
dc.subjectAmerican Standard Version
dc.subjectRevised Standard Version
dc.subjectThe Readerโ€™s Digest Bible
dc.subjectNew Revised Standard Version
dc.subjectEnglish Standard Version
dc.subjectNew Revised Standard Version Updated Edition
dc.subjectdigital media interpretive culture
dc.titleThe ๐˜™๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜š๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฅ ๐˜๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ (1952) and its revisions as a linear emergence of the Tyndaleโ€“King James Version tradition
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Miller-Naude & Naude_The Revised Standard Version (1952) and its revisions_2022.pdf
Size:
636.41 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.63 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: