Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHowes, L.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-17T09:17:45Z
dc.date.available2017-01-17T09:17:45Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationHowes, L. (2015). "Divided against itself"? Individual maxims and the redaction of Q. Acta Theologica, 35(1), 96-114.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn1015-8758 (print)
dc.identifier.issn2309-9089 (online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.4314/actat.v35i1.6
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11660/5336
dc.description.abstractIn his analysis, Kloppenborg (1987) identified a number of logia in the main redaction that were more proverbial than prophetic in nature. This article considers the possibility that these sayings originally formed part of Q, but were added to Q by the main redactor during the redactional process. It also explores the possibility that the main redactor not only inserted and interpolated prophetic material into Q, but also transformed original wisdom sayings into prophetic Q material.en_ZA
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherFaculty of Theology, University of the Free Stateen_ZA
dc.subjectSayings Gospel Qen_ZA
dc.subjectRedactionen_ZA
dc.subjectKloppenborgen_ZA
dc.subjectStratificationen_ZA
dc.subjectMaxims/Proverbsen_ZA
dc.title"Divided against itself"? Individual maxims and the redaction of Qen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
dc.description.versionPublisher's versionen_ZA
dc.rights.holderFaculty of Theology, University of the Free Stateen_ZA


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record