Occupational Therapy
Permanent URI for this community
Browse
Browsing Occupational Therapy by Advisor "Raubenheimer, J."
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access Sensory integration difficulties and dysfunctions in children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders(University of the Free State, 2017-06) Du Plooy, Maritha; Van Jaarsveld, A.; Raubenheimer, J.; Janse van Rensburg, E.Introduction: The effects of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (FASD) are devastating and enduring, impacting on performance skills and limiting successful participation in activities of daily life. The high prevalence of FASD in the Western Cape, together with poor results in school performance, are reasons for concern. Symptoms of sensory integration dysfunctions are reported as challenges faced by children with FASD. The aim of this study was to describe sensory integration difficulties and dysfunctions experienced in a group of children aged five to eight years old from the Cape Winelands Education District (CWED), both with and without a diagnosis of FASD. Objectives: The main objectives were to investigate sensory modulation, as measured by the Sensory Profiles, and sensory processing and practic abilities, as measured by the SIPT, of an identified group of children with FASD and a matched controlled group without a diagnosis of FASD. A final objective was to identify patterns of sensory integration difficulties and dysfunctions, to describe these findings, and to draw conclusions about the distinctive patterns of sensory integration difficulties and dysfunctions among children with FASD. Methodology: Thirty children with FASD (cases) were compared with a matched sample (controls) without FASD. Standardized measuring instruments, the Sensory Profile (SP), Sensory Profile School Companion (SPSC) as well as the Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests (SIPT), were used in this quantitative, observational, analytical study. Results: Higher percentages of cases than controls experienced challenges in 22 of the 23 categories of the Sensory Profile, with significant differences in nine of the categories. According to the results of the Sensory Profile School Companion, cases experienced more challenges in all 13 of the categories, with significant differences in three. Comparison of the mean scores of the matched sample showed significant differences in eight categories of the SP and three of the SPSC, with the cases performing poorer. The highest percentages of cases in the Definite Difference and Probable Difference ranges were recorded for Sensory Seeking (90% (n=18)), Inattention/Distractibility (85% (n=17)), Auditory Processing (70% (n=14)), Multisensory Processing (85% (n=17)), Registration (62% (n=19)) and Avoiding (62% (n=19)). The identified sensory processing difficulties seemed to occur in multiple sensory systems, ranging from under- to over-responsiveness. It is important to note that sensory processing difficulties were also reported for the controls, although at lower percentage levels. The paired t-test results indicated significant differences between the paired cases and controls in eleven of the seventeen test items of the SIPT, with the cases performing poorer. According to the results, 14 (46.7%) of the cases adhere to the criteria recognised as a Visuo- and Somatodyspraxia pattern of dysfunction. The difficulties and dysfunctions identified by the Sensory Profiles and SIPT could contribute to the challenges experienced in occupations of the children with FASD. Conclusion: Although further research is needed, the results from this study confirm sensory integration difficulties and dysfunctions of the FASD population impacting on their daily functioning and performance. Consistencies with previous research results were found. The outcome of this study has clinical importance for occupational therapists working with children with FASD, and for educators and caregivers in terms of intervention, education and caring.Item Open Access Sensory integration intervention and the development of the extremely low to very low birth weight premature infant(University of the Free State, 2012-12) Lecuona, Elise R.; Van Jaarsveld, A.; Van Heerden, S. M.; Raubenheimer, J.English: This study aimed to investigate the effect of ASI intervention on the development of premature infants with ELBW to VLBW, within the first 12 months. ASI intervention approach is from the sensory integration theoretical and practice frame of reference used in occupational therapy. ASI provides playful meaningful activities aimed at enhancing sensory processing abilities of the brain and ultimately lead to appropriate adaptive functioning in daily life. From the literature review it was evident that newborn premature infants are at risk for possible SI difficulties and developmental delays due to their immature CNS and possible times of medical instability, discomfort, pain and stress during the first weeks or months after birth. Research on effective developmental intervention strategies for premature infants is however limited and previous research related to ASI intervention on the development of the premature infant post discharge from the NICU could not be found by the researcher. Since SI forms the underlying foundation for learning and social behavior (Ayers, 2008:7), research in this field is essential for prevention of developmental delays and learning difficulties of premature infants. The research proposal for this study was approved by the Ethics Committee, Faculty of Health Sciences of the University of the Free State (ECUFS no. 117/2011). Permission was obtained from appropriate authorities to conduct the study at the Occupational Therapy Department of Universitas Academic Hospital. A pilot study was done to determine the feasibility of the study. A quantitative research approach was used to determine the effect of ASI intervention on the development of the ELBW to VLBW premature infant. Through a pre-test/post-test experimental design, the population of 24 premature infants was randomly divided into an experimental and control group with 12 infants in each group respectively. Infants were matched according to their corrected ages and gender. Participants had corrected ages between four and 10 months, VLBW to ELBW, adhered to the inclusion criteria for the study and were referred from the High-Risk Infant Clinic at Universitas Academic Hospital. The developmental status of participants was determined with the Bayley III Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley, 2006a), Test of Sensory Function in Infants (TSFI) (DeGangi & Greenspan, 1989) and Infant /Toddler Sensory Profile (Dunn, 2002) before and after a 10 week ASI intervention period with infants in the experimental group. The results of the Fidelity Measure indicated that the interventions sessions complied with the requirements for ASI intervention. The pre- and post-test results were analyzed, interpreted and compared. The anthropometric and demographic profiles of the infants in both groups indicated that there was no statistical difference between the two groups except for the time hospitalized which was in favour of the control group and therefore the researcher was able to make reliable conclusions in terms of the study results. This study has found that ASI intervention had a positive effect on the sensory processing and developmental progress of ELBW to VLBW premature infants especially in terms of cognitive-, language-, motor- and adaptive behaviour development within a short period of 10 weeks. Parents showed more interest and a better understanding of the developmental progress and sensory processing of their infants. This study has therefore provided sufficient evidence that early intervention in terms of ASI plays a critical role in the intervention approach of the sensory integration trained occupational therapists, working with premature infants and their parents. The study results did not only indicate the importance of ASI intervention for better developmental outcomes for ELBW to VLBW premature infants, but also revealed that a lack of ASI intervention leads to a deterioration of developmental and behavioural outcomes.