Fungal diseases of pigeonpea in South Africa
Loading...
Date
Authors
Van Jaarsveld, Liezl Charene
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University of the Free State
Abstract
Showing abstract in English
English: In the literature review, an overview of host, pathogen and environment
related factors, showed that by studying sub-components of the disease triangle
individually, and then integrating them, a holistic approach to control of pigeonpea
(Cajanus cajan) diseases is possible. Sub-components that were identified as
being most important in the control of legume diseases, were host resistance and
cultural practices.
Two fungal species, consistently isolated from pigeonpea leaf spots, were
identified as Passalora cajani and Cercospora apii. Pathogenicity could however
not be proven for these species, suggesting that they are probably latent-infecting
fungi. The C. apii and P. cajani isolates varied significantly regarding nutritional
and temperature requirements. Inhibition by fungicides varied, with flusilazole/
carbendazim inhibiting growth of both P. cajani and C. apii most effectively, but
mancozeb was found to be least effective. The general trend was that all five
fungicides inhibited fungal growth effectively at concentrations higher than 5 :g
a.i./ ml. Cluster analysis using physiological data revealed two distinct groups, one
group containing the three C. apii isolates, and the other group the eight P. cajani
isolates. Results of a molecular study were consistent with those of physiological
studies.
Development of infection structures were studied for the pathogen Uredo
cajani, cause of pigeonpea rust. Uredo cajani was shown to be a well adapted
parasite, with leaf topography influencing the growth habit of germ tubes and
infection. A comparison of infection structures, at different sampling times and on
six pigeonpea varieties, showed some variation in susceptibility which was of a
non-hypersensitive nature. This mechanism seems to be sufficient to restrict U.
cajani infection, and probably explains why pigeonpea rust is considered of lesser
importance. Variety ICP 6927 was least and ICPL 87119 most susceptible to rust.
Susceptibility levels in medium-duration (MD) varieties were variable, but more
consistent in long-duration (LD) varieties.
A rating system was developed which provided a simple and effective aid
in determining varietal and treatment differences based on the severity of rust on pigeonpea. Higher disease incidence was observed in MD varieties, due to the
shorter maturation period when compared to LD varieties. All varieties used in this
trial were susceptible to rust, with variety ICP 6927 most susceptible and ICEAP
0020, least susceptible. Flusilazole/carbendazim and azoxystrobin, sprayed
alternately, effectively controlled U. cajani, but fungicide treatments did not
significantly increase seed yield nor quality. The highest yielding variety was ICP
6927 and the lowest ICPL 87119. A negative correlation for LD varieties between
yield and disease suggests that high yield losses are associated with increasing
disease severity over time and the control of rust on pigeonpea with fungicides is
an effective, but not economically viable, control measure.