Centralised versus decentralised administrative resource allocation in the Faculty of the Humanities at the University of the Free State
Loading...
Date
2015-11
Authors
Coetsee, Marica
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University of the Free State
Abstract
At present, universities find themselves in an environment of increasing competition
for scarce resources in the public sector at large. Being in a competitive environment,
universities might lean towards a centralised management control system (on the one
extreme) to improve coordination, monitor quality and reduce costs, but still allowing
academic decision-making to take place at departmental level (decentralised on the
other extreme). Due to the increasing tension between these polarities, universities
tend to opt for a more hybrid option by adapting the best of both practices in order to
optimise the allocation of scarce resources. Furthermore, external audits and quality
control mechanisms increase the accountability on the universities’ side, forcing them
to implement transparent resource allocation procedures. The problem facing
Faculties of the Humanities is the ability to identify the best form of an administrative
framework in order to optimise resource allocation and improve service delivery in
academic administration. The primary objective of this study is to propose an
administrative framework for Faculties of the Humanities in order to improve service
delivery in academic administration.
Various qualitative research methods were used to gather data. These included the
investigation of possible administrative structures available to the Faculty of the
Humanities at the UFS by comparing it to the administrative structures of Humanities
faculties at other universities. The recent restructuring of academic support structures
in the office of the Dean in the Faculty of the Humanities at the UFS will also be
analysed in an attempt to identify further optimisation of service delivery to students.
Data collection took place through semi-structured interviews; informal interviews;
focus-group observation and texts and electronic resources. Through process and
activity analysis, the recent restructuring of academic administrative processes in the
Dean’s Office in the Faculty of the Humanities was used as a basis for possible
adjustments and improvements in order to identify the optimal administrative structure.
Demographic change; rapid advance of digital technology; political atmosphere, and
the professionalisation of university administration are all factors forcing the university
and the Faculty, to adapt in order to provide their students with the best possible service. Within the Faculty, the challenge of adequate human resources is
complicated further with the constant underlying tension of costs incurred for
administrative staff versus academic staff.
In conclusion, it is advised that the Faculty of the Humanities at the UFS adopt a hybrid
administrative framework, capitalising on the strengths of both the centralised and the
decentralised models. On a central level, clear guidelines through policies and
procedures will provide a solid framework as reference for the Faculty to build its
processes around. In turn, this will provide the Faculty with the necessary room for
flexibility on a decentralised platform to make its own decisions and to respond more
promptly to any external changes that might have an impact on the Faculty. Through
a hybrid administrative system, collaboration between the Faculty and the central
administration will be emphasised and the isolation of any of the two units from the
institutional goals will be prevented.
Description
Keywords
Resources, Centralized management, Decentralised management, Hybrid, Administrative framework, Academic administration, Qualitative research methods, Semi-structured interviews, Focus-group observation, University administration, Dissertation (MBA (Business Administration))--University of the Free State, 2015