Nie-egte vrae in die Romeinebrief: 'n taalhandelingsperspektief

Master’s Dissertation
dc.contributor.advisorVan Jaarsveld, G. J.
dc.contributor.advisorCronje, J. V. 
dc.contributor.authorVerster, Pieter
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-22T08:18:12Z
dc.date.issued1999
dc.description.abstractEnglish: In this study questions previously distinguished only as Rhetorical Questions are classified as non-true questions in accordance with the Speech Act theory. The useful classification of the Speech Act theory is used to put forward a model in which the non-true questions in Romans can be distinguished. Six main categories are distinguished. The model is as follows: A. TRUE QUESTIONS B. NON- TRUE QUESTIONS Under this main category the following is distinguished: 1. Questions of action Directives: Commands, invitations, etc. 2. Questions as Statements: with 2.1 Question statements 2.2 Rhetorical questions 2.3 Meta-communicative Rl 3. Empty Statements 4. Questions that carry emotions: with: 4. 1 Emotion enhance questions 5. Monologue Self-aimed Questions with 5.1 Self-inquiry RI 5.2 Self-acceptance RI 6. Rational-argumentative Questions With 6.1 Appeal questions 6.2 Ironical RI This model was tested and it was concluded that is should be developed to include Theme enhance questions as a 7 th category.en_ZA
dc.description.abstractAfrikaans: In hierdie studie word vrae wat voeër as onder een noemer as Retoriese Vrae geklasifiseer is as nie-egte vrae beskryf en ontleed aan die hand van die taalhandelingsteorie. Die nuttige onderskeidings van die taalhandelingsteorie word aangewend om 'n model daar te stel waarvolgens nie-egte vrae in die Romeinebrief onderskei kan word. Ses hoofkategorieë is onderskei. Die model sien soos volg daar uit: A. EGTE VRAE B. NIE-EGTE VRAE Onder hierdie hoofgroep kan dan onderskei word: 1. Vrae wat aksie verlang Direktiewe: opdragte, versoeke, uitnodings ens. 2: Vrae wat as stellings beskou word: waaronder 2.1 Vraagstellings 2.2 Retoriese vrae 2.3 Meta-kommunikatiewe Rl 3. Leë vraagstellings 4. Vrae wat primêr emosie oordra: 4.1 Emosieversterkers 5. Monologiese Selfgerigte Vrae waaronder 5.1 Self-ondersoekende RI 5.2 Self-aanvaardings RI 6. Rasioneel-argumentatiewe Vrae Waaronder 6.1 Vraagappêlle 6.2 Ironiese RI Die model is getoets en daar is bevind dat dit uitgebrei moet word om vir 'n spesiale kategorie wat as Temaversterkers onderskei word, voorsiening te maak.en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11660/13415
dc.language.isoafen_ZA
dc.publisherUniversity of the Free Stateen_ZA
dc.rights.holderUniversity of the Free Stateen_ZA
dc.subjectSpeech Act theoryen_ZA
dc.subjectNon-true questionsen_ZA
dc.subjectModel of non-true questionsen_ZA
dc.subjectDistinction of non-true questions in Romansen_ZA
dc.subjectTheme enhance questionsen_ZA
dc.titleNie-egte vrae in die Romeinebrief: 'n taalhandelingsperspektiefen_ZA
dc.typeDissertationen_ZA
local.abstractLang.availableEnglish
local.abstractLang.availableAfrikaans
local.abstractLang.coverage1 Language

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
VenterP.pdf
Size:
7.81 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.76 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: