What is wrong with current theorisations of ‘boredom’?

dc.contributor.authorAlly, Mashuq
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-24T06:45:27Z
dc.date.available2017-08-24T06:45:27Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.description.abstractEnglish: This article examines theoretical attempts to focus attention on the much-neglected phenomenon of “boredom” and evaluate the extent to which the theorists succeed in illuminating it. It is argued that cognitively important aspects of boredom are ignored by these theorists and suggest ways in which such shortcomings in the treatment of boredom may be addressed in future studies.en_ZA
dc.description.abstractAfrikaans: Hierdie artikel ondersoek teoretiese pogings om aandag op die hoogs verwaarloosde fenomeen van “verveling” te vestig en te evalueer tot watter mate teoretici daarin slaag om dit te verhelder. Dit word geargumenteer dat bewussynsbelangrike aspekte van “verveling” deur hierdie teoretici geïgnoreer word en wyses word voorgestel waardeur sulke tekortkominge aangespreek kan word in toekomstige studies van “verveling”.af
dc.description.versionPublisher's versionen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationAlly, M. (2008). What is wrong with current theorisations of'boredom'? Acta Academica, 40(3), 35-66.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn0587-2405 (print)
dc.identifier.issn2415-0479 (online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11660/6642
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherUniversity of the Free Stateen_ZA
dc.rights.holderUniversity of the Free Stateen_ZA
dc.subjectBoredomen_ZA
dc.titleWhat is wrong with current theorisations of ‘boredom’?en_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
academ_v40_n3_a2.pdf
Size:
127.35 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.76 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: