An assessment of endophytic fungi in needles of three pinus spp. cultivated in South Africa

English: Endophytes, in the strict sense, are organisms that cause symptom less infections in plants. As symptomless mutualists, they can act as biocontrol agents of herbivorous insects and plant diseases. They can also be indicative of host vitality and environmental pollution. Some endophytes, however, are latent pathogens with an endophytic phase. Pine needles are colonised by various species of endophytic fungi. It is well-known that the endophytic biota vary with host species, as well as with time. Therefore the aim of this study was to qualitatively and quantitatively compare endophyte populations within the canopies of Pinas patula, P. radiata and P. elliottii, during winter and summer, and within the canopies of two separate P. radiata trees, over different seasons. Endophytic fungi were isolated from pine needles, sampled in different seasons from various positions within the canopy, by plating surface-sterilised needle sections onto cornmeal agar supplemented with antibiotics. In the first study a significant difference (P < 0.05) in endophyte numbers between samples collected during winter and summer was observed. Pinus patula and P. elliottii were more intensively colonised during winter than summer. In P. radiata, however, the number of fungi isolated in summer was significantly higher than in winter, but the fungal species isolated were consistent. Cydsneusms minus and a sterile white yeast-like fungus were most commonly isolated. Cyclsneusms minus is a latent pathogen causing autumn needle cast, and sterile yeast-like fungus is suspected to be a true endophyte. Similar endophytic fungal species were isolated in the second study, performed on two eight-year-old P. radiata trees. Samples were taken during four seasons from an isolated, solitary tree and one growing in an even-aged, plantation nearby. Five needle fascicles of four different age groups were collected from each tree. One needle per fascicle, including the fascicle sheath, was cut into 12 sections and used for the isolations. In general, fewer endophytes were isolated from the solitary tree than the plantation tree. Qualitative and quantitative differences in endophyte populations were observed within needles as well as between needle age groups and seasons. The aim of the third study was to conduct a qualitative assay of enzyme production of 2 t predominant fungal endophytes isolated from the pine needles. The enzymes assayed included cellulase, pectinase, lipase, laccase, phenol oxidase, protease, B-glucosidase, cytochrome oxidase, and peroxidase. Results were consistent with attributes associated with leaf penetration and longterm residence of fungi within pine needles. All fungi screened produced at least two of the enzymes assayed. Different substrate utilisation patterns suggest biochemical partitioning of nutritional resources by endophytes. The ubiquitous presence of lipolytic activity in all isolates tested, suggests the ability to lyse cuticular waxes in order for penetration to occur. The tolerance of most tested fungi to tannic acid (phenol oxydase production) suggests low sensitivity to phenolic compounds (tannins etc.) normally present in pine needle tissue. Management practices in plantations that reduce or increase the environmental stress on individual trees, thereby influencing endophytic populations, could have distinct beneficial or negative effects on the general vitality of trees. The most important effects of certain practices would be the influence they have on latent pathogens such as C minus. Further investigation of foliar endophytic fungi of intensively managed pine plantations is therefore justified with a view to understand the effects management practices have on their ecology.