Taxonomy, spoilage, and virulence characteristics of ๐˜’๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ข species isolated from fish

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Date
2023
Authors
Gavu, Masabata Lydia
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University of the Free State
Abstract
In previous studies at the University of the Free State, aerobic, Gram-negative bacteria were isolated from Cape hake (๐˜”๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ญ๐˜ถ๐˜ค๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ถ๐˜ด ๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ด), intended for human consumption. Although some of these isolates could be identified, six isolates remained unidentified. The purpose of this study was to determine the genomic and phenotypic characteristics of these isolates to assign them to the correct genus, to describe novel species, if present, to determine the significance of these isolates in terms of pathogenicity and/or spoilage, and to isolate bacteriophages against the bacterial strains for possible biocontrol strategies. Based on 16S rRNA gene sequences, phylogenetic analysis confirmed that the six unidentified bacterial strains used in this study represented members of the genus ๐˜’๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ข. Four of these six isolates were further characterized to determine whether they were novel species. Using genomic and phenotypic techniques, the DNA G+C content of strains SH 11-4(b), SH 19-2(b), SH 20-4 and SH 40-3 supported their affiliation with the genus ๐˜’๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ข. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization, average nucleotide identity and amino acid identity values, and phenotypic characteristics demonstrated that strains SH 11-4(b), SH 19-2(b) and SH 40-3 represented novel species of the genus ๐˜’๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ข. Results for strain SH 20-4 confirmed that it was not a novel species but represented another member of ๐˜’๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ข ๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฏ๐˜ช๐˜ด. The names of the novel species were proposed as ๐˜’๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ข ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ญ๐˜ถ๐˜ค๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ช SH 11-4(b), ๐˜’๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ข ๐˜ฑ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ด SH 19-2(b), and ๐˜’๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ข ๐˜ง๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜จ๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ฑ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ด SH 40-3. The potential pathogenicity and/or food spoilage capability of the six ๐˜’๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ข fish isolates and reference strains were then evaluated by determining the production of siderophores, the production of a variety of enzymes that function as virulence factors, evaluating their antimicrobial resistance patterns, their ability to form biofilms, as well as the determination of their resistance to antibiofilm compounds. All the ๐˜’๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ข isolates produced Siderophores indicating their ability to sequester iron for survival. Gelatinase, whose expression has been linked to enhanced biofilm formation, was produced in the most significant amounts by most organisms in this study. โ€˜๐˜’๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ข ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ญ๐˜ถ๐˜ค๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ชโ€™ SH 11-4(b) could be regarded as a potential pathogen since it produced more than 4/8 virulence enzymes. ๐˜’๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ข strains SH 11-3(a) and โ€˜๐˜’. ๐˜ง๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜จ๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ฑ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ดโ€™ SH 40-3 were the most resistant to antimicrobials. The antimicrobial resistance/susceptibility of the ๐˜’๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ข and ๐˜Š๐˜ฉ๐˜ณ๐˜บ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฃ๐˜ข๐˜ค๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ถ๐˜ฎ species in this study was determined using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion susceptibility method. The antimicrobial tests concluded that the fluoroquinolone and cephem antimicrobials would be the most effective in treating ๐˜’๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ข infections. ๐˜’๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ข ๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฏ๐˜ช๐˜ด SH 20-4 was regarded as a strong biofilm former since it gave positive results for biofilm formation using three different methods, while strains SH 11-3(a) and โ€˜K. ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ญ๐˜ถ๐˜ค๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ชโ€™ SH 11-4(b) were the least successful at forming biofilms. This study revealed that 100 mM D-glucose was the most effective biofilm inhibition compound against the ๐˜’๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ข test strains. Organisms whose biofilms showed the most resistance towards the inhibition compounds included K. ๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฏ๐˜ช๐˜ด SH 20-4 and โ€˜K. ๐˜ง๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜จ๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ฑ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ดโ€™ SH 40-3 and susceptibility to the inhibition compounds mainly was observed in SH 11-3(a), SH 11-3(b), โ€˜K. ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ญ๐˜ถ๐˜ค๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ชโ€™ SH 11-4(b) and โ€˜K. piscisโ€™ SH 19-2(b). Another aim of this study was to isolate lytic bacteriophages against the ๐˜’๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ข species that may be pathogenic to fish or may cause food spoilage by using a two-fold agar overlay in a plaque experiment. Thirty-four phage isolates were obtained from the sewage and fishpond water samples. Strains SH 11-3(a) and SH 11-3(b) showed sensitivity toward a few phage isolates while โ€˜K. ๐˜ฑ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ดโ€™ SH 19-2(a) displayed the greatest resistance towards phage infection. Phage strains 11-3(b)-S2 showed a broader host spectrum than other phage isolates because they displayed lytic activity against 5/12 ๐˜’๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ข isolates. Most of the isolated phages were identified by transmission electron microscopy as members of the ๐˜Š๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ข๐˜ฆ, ๐˜—๐˜ญ๐˜ข๐˜ด๐˜ฎ๐˜ข๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ข๐˜ฆ, ๐˜”๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ข๐˜ฆ, ๐˜š๐˜ช๐˜ฑ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฐ๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ข๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜›๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ข๐˜ฆ families. The three new members of the genus ๐˜’๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ข were accurately classified, described, and named. The role of the six ๐˜’๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ข species in virulence was determined. Some isolated phages can potentially prevent, eliminate, or reduce ๐˜’๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ข infections in fish.
Description
Thesis (Ph.D.(Food Science))--University of the Free State, 2023
Keywords
๐˜’๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ข, ๐˜Š๐˜ฉ๐˜ณ๐˜บ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฃ๐˜ข๐˜ค๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ถ๐˜ฎ taxonomy, potential pathogenicity, antimicrobial resistance, biocontrol strategies, biofilm formation, bacteriophage isolation
Citation