The high school teacher's role in maximizing learners' initiative in English second language classes in Lesotho
Loading...
Date
Authors
Rantsoai, Ntsotiseng Mary-Goretti
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University of the Free State
Abstract
Showing abstract in English
English: The introductory chapters of this study explain minimum and maximum learner initiative and the forms in which they can be identified in the language
teaching-Ieaming process. In other words, second language learners' and
teachers' positions in language classrooms are defined. In so doing the advantages
and disadvantages of maximum and minimum learner initiative were shown. The
repercussions of the traditional IRF pattern of interaction in English second language
classes are discussed in datal
Using Bowers (1987) as conceptual framework, the researcher proceeded to identify
the most recurrent pattems of interaction in Form E classes in some of the high
schools in Lesotho, with specific reference to lingual data. She audiotaped seven
pre-counselling lessons and seven interviews between the teachers and her. She
also gave a questionnaire to the students so that she could collect more data for
validation and triangulation purposes. The transcription of the lingual data, in
Bowers' (1987) pre-counselling phase, revealed that most of the teachers adhered to
the traditional IRF discourse cycle in English second language classes.
The analysis of the lessons, interviews and questionnaires led to Bowers' (1987)
counselling/intervention phase. It also made it easy for the teachers to identify their
learner initiative-minimizing techniques in language classes. This meant a detailed
discussion on maximizing and minimizing learner initiative and their effects in second
language learning. The teacher's role in maximizing leamer initiative was thus
emphasised. The researcher, then, suggested various ways in which the teachers
could maximize leamer initiative. They were also advised to set learning outcomes
so as to provide a guide for the implementation of these suggestions.
The intervention phase was followed by the post-counselling/intervention phase of
Bowers' model. Each of the seven teachers had his or her post-counselling lesson
recorded and transcribed. The main purpose was to make it easy for the researcher
and the teachers to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention phase. Evidently
all the teachers had maximized leamer initiative through different techniques
although they could not implement all the suggested techniques.
One cannot tell whether the teachers still adhered to the notion of maximizing leamer
initiative after the researcher's departure. The researcher therefore recommended,
in this study, that second language teachers should receive regular counselling from
the inspectors, their colleagues in their schools and from other schools, and lecturers
from Lesotho College of Education and the National University of Lesotho. The need
for teachers' communicative and pedagogic competences to be developed is also
apparent from this study.