An assessment model in outcomes-based education and training for health sciences and technology

English: The promulgation of the SAQA Act No. 58 of 1995, following the new democracy in South Africa, is regarded as the impetus for change in higher education. It was consequently recommended that higher education institutions should implement the Outcomes-based education and training (OBET) approach. The literature review conducted in this study emphasised the move towards assessment in the OBET approach in medical and health care education. Assessment in higher education has therefore become an essential issue to deal with. Likewise, the need for educators in Health Sciences and Technology to become empowered with the principles of assessment in the OBET approach was identified. A study was conducted to revisit current assessment practices in Health Sciences and Technology at the Technikon Free State and the University of the Free State, with the OBET approach as background. The aim of the study was to compile an assessment model in OBET for Health Sciences and Technology. With the assessment model, the change to assessment in the new approach in higher education in Health Sciences and Technology could be facilitated. A questionnaire for the structured interviews was designed, based on essential elements of assessment identified in literature on assessment and the OBET approach. The structured interviews were conducted with 16 headhunted academics from Health Sciences, Technology and higher education studies from the University of the Free State and the Technikon Free State respectively from July to August 2002. The information from the structured interviews, supported and supplemented by the literature on assessment and the OBET approach, was subsequently used to compile a proposed assessment model. The statements of the proposed assessment model were fed into the questionnaire for the Delphi process. A three-round modified Delphi process, conducted from February to August 2003, was applied to rate the statements of the proposed assessment model according to essential, useful or unnecessary statements of an assessment model. The aim was to attain consensus on the ratings of the statements, with consensus defined as 80 percent of the Delphi panel in agreement. Additionally, the Delphi panel could rephrase and/or comment on the statements of the proposed assessment model. The Delphi panel, consisting of 10 members, represented five different areas in higher education and assessment. Findings of the Delphi process and the literature on assessment and the OBET approach were used to compile the final assessment model in OBET for Health Sciences and Technology. The findings of the structured interviews indicated that the participants in the study were knowledgeable about the range of innovative (performance) assessment methods. However, the participants pointed out that they lacked the knowledge and skills to optimally make use of these innovative assessment methods. This was evident from the fact that fewer than 50 percent of the participants used an appropriate range of innovative assessment methods in the questionnaire. However, it should be noted that the OBET approach had not been implemented in the relevant programmes at the participating institutions at the time of the interviews. Even so, the information obtained from the structured interviews was adequate to compile the proposed assessment model in OBET for Health Sciences and Technology. The outcome after three rounds of the modified Delphi process used in the study, was that consensus on 60 percent of the statements of the proposed assessment model had been attained. The statements were all rated as essential elements of an assessment model, with the majority of the statements achieving consensus between rounds I and II of the Delphi process. The final assessment model was presented as 65 essential and six useful statements in seven categories. With the exception of two statements, all the statements rated by the Delphi panel were included in the final assessment model. This was based on the ratings of the statements of the assessment model by the Delphi panel and verified by literature on assessment in the OBET approach. The willingness of the participants in the study to share information on successes and failures experienced in assessment practices contributed positively to the design of the assessment model. This assessment model in OBET for Health Sciences and Technology was developed, designed and compiled to perform integrated and quality assessment in the programme. The generic assessment model should provide a programme with direction to practise meaningful and holistic assessment in the OBET approach. In addition, using the assessment model in OBET for Health Sciences and Technology should add value to learning. Likewise, by means of the assessment model, assessment should be repositioned at the centre of learning activities in higher education. The information from the structured interviews proved useful to compile and develop the proposed assessment model. The three-round modified Delphi process was an effective research methodology to validate and benchmark the statements of the proposed assessment model. In addition, the assessment model could become a valuable educational tool with which assessment in Health Sciences and Technology could be repositioned as a process that matters to academics, learners, the institution, accrediting bodies, as well as current and future employers.