Genetic factors affecting milk production, growth and reproduction traits in Bos indicus x Bos taurus crosses in Ethiopia
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Mulugeta, Sendros Demeke
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University of the Free State
Abstract
Showing abstract in English
English: Five separate studies were conducted to investigate the genetic factors affecting
growth, milk production and reproduction traits in Bos indicus x Bos taurus
crosses in Ethiopia. The first three studies were based on early growth data
collected from the purebred Boran (Bo), Barca (Ba), Horror (Ho) (Bos indicus)
and their crosses with the Friesian (F), Jersey (1) and Simmental (S) breeds (Bos
taurus). Early growth data were for calves that were representing three purebred
Bos indicus and 38 crossbred genotypes and were separated from their dams one
day after birth and fed milk from a bucket. The fourth and fifth studies were
based on milk and reproduction data collected from cows of two purebreds
(Boran and Friesian) and eight crossbred (crosses of Friesian and Jersey with
Boran) genotypes.
In the first study, five genetic models were evaluated for goodness of fit and
estimation of crossbreeding parameters. These models were: 1) Dominance
model, 2) Dickerson's model (recombination loss), 3) Additive x dominance
interaction model, 4) Dominance x dominance interaction model and 5)
Kinghom's model (x). Models 2 to 5 are epistatic models that included all effects
in model one plus one type of epistatic interaction based on a two-locus gene
model. The models were evaluated using data for birth, weaning, yearling
weights and preweaning average daily gain. All five models tested provided high
levels of fit, with adjusted R2 values averaging 93% over traits. All the epistatic
models fit the data significantly (P<0.05) better than the dominance model for all
the traits. Among the epistatic models, Dickerson's model (Model 2) gave
significantly (P<0.05) higher R2 values compared to the other epistatic models.
Crossbreeding parameters estimated from this model has relatively lower
sampling correlations and correspondingly lower standard errors. This model
could, therefore, be considered as the most appropriate one for parameter
estimation and prediction of performances of untested genotypes for future
crossbreeding decisions for the breeds involved in this study.
In the second study, breed difference, heterosis and recombination loss were
estimated for birth weight (BWT), weaning weight (WWT), preweaning average
daily gain (ADG) and yearling weight (YWT), fitting an animal model.
Differences between genotypes were significant (P<0.01) for all traits. Genetic
group means adjusted for environmental effects ranged from 20 to 30 kg for
BWT, 88 to 114kg for WWT, 122 to 157kg for YWT and 358 to 492g for preweaning
average daily gain (ADG). The breed additive effect of the F as a
deviation from the Bo was significant (P<0.01) and positive for all traits.
Relative to the Bo mean, the additional breed additive contribution of the F breed
on BWT, WWT, ADG and YWT was 39.3, 16.5, 9.3 and 10.3%, respectively.
On the other hand, the breed additive effects of the Ho and J breeds were
significantly (P<0.01) negative for all traits. The heterotic effects were
significantly negative (P<0.01) for BWT for all F and S crosses, but positive
(P<0.01) for all other traits for all types of crosses. The average heterosis
estimated within the F, J and S breeds were: -2.1±0.6, 0.2±0.6 (P>0.05) and
-2.3±0.6 kg for BWT, 8.8±2.1, 11.8±2.3 and 13.7±2.4 kg for WWT, 60.4±11.3,
64.8±12.3 and 90.6±12.7 g for ADG and 19.8±2.6, 19.5±2.8 and 20.8±2.9kg for
YWT, respectively. The recombination effects were significant (P<0.01) for the
majority of crosses for all traits. The estimates for the recombination loss were
negative for all traits, except for BWT. The average recombination effects
estimated within the F, J and S breeds were: 2.6±0.8, 2.9±0.9 and 2.4±1.0 kg for
BWT, -13.6±3.2, -4.2±3.4 (P>0.05) and -16.0±4.0 kg for WWT, -88.0±17.1,
-39.4±18.4 and -102.2±21.3 g for ADG and -14.4±4.0, -0.1±4.4 (P>0.05) and
-17.5±4.9 kg for YWT, respectively.
In the third study, variance components and direct and maternal heritabilities
were estimated for weight at birth, weaning and yearling and preweaning average
daily gain. Data were analysed using six alternative animal models (direct and
including or excluding maternal effects). The direct heritability estimates from
the "best" model for each trait were: 0.14±0.03 for birth weight, 0.08±0.03 for
weaning weight, 0.06±0.02 for preweaning average daily gain and 0.13±0.03 for
yearling weight. The direct maternal heritability estimates were small, but
significantly different from zero for only birth weight (0.07±0.02), weaning
weight (0.04±0.02) and preweaning average daily gain (0.04±0.02). Direct
genetic correlations between birth weight and the other three traits were:
0.66±0.08, 0.55±0.19 and 0.50±0.12 with weaning weight, preweaning average
daily gain and yearling weight, respectively. The genetic correlation between
weaning weight, preweaning average daily gain and yearling weight was high
and ranged from 0.82±0.11 to 0.97±0.O1. Small, but non-zero maternal
heritabilities estimated for weaning and preweaning average daily gain for
artificially reared calves in this study should be interpreted cautiously because of
potential bias from unaccounted breed additive and non-additive effects of the
dam. Results of this study also showed that estimates of variance components
and genetic parameters suitable for general use can be obtained from mixed
purebred and crossbred data after appropriately accounting for breed additive and
non-additive effects.
In the fourth study, breed additive and non-additive effects plus heritabilities and
repeatabilities for milk yield per lactation (LMY), milk yield per day (DMY),
lactation length (LL), annual milk yield (AMY), annual milk yield per metabolic
body weight (AMYBW) and cow weight at calving (BW) were estimated. In
addition, genetic, phenotypic and permanent environmental correlations were
estimated between AMY and LL, AMY and BW and LL and BW. Data for each
trait were analysed, using two equivalent repeatability animal models: first,
fitting genotype as a fixed group effect and in the second model substituting
genotype with breed additive, heterotic and recombination effects as fixed
covariates. Among the genotypes the Bo had the lowest and the F the highest
performance for all traits. The least-squares means for the Bo breed were 529±65
kg for LMY, 2.8±0.1 kg for DMY, 193±6 d for LL, 514±61 kg for AMY,
7.8±0.7 for AMYBW and 304±3 kg for BW. Both F and J breed additive effects,
measured as a deviation from the Bo breed were significant (P<0.01) for all
traits, except for BW of the J. The F and J additive contributions were 2774±89
and 1473±362 kg for LMY, 7.1±0.2 and 4.8±0.8 kg for DMY, 146±8 and 81±7 d
for LL, 2345±71 and 1238±319 kg for AMY, 20.6±0.9 and 18.9±4.3 kg for
AMYBWand 140±4 and -21±22 kg (P>0.5) for BW, respectively. The heterotic
contributions to the crossbred performance were also positive and significant
(P<0.01) for all traits, except for BW in the F x Bo crosses. The Fl heterosis
expressed as a deviation from the mid-parent values were 22 and 66 % for LMY,
11 and 20% for DMY, 29 and 29% for LL, 21 and 64 % for AMY, 42% (P>0.05)
and 42 % for AMYBW and 2% (P>0.5) and 11% for BW for the F x Bo and J x
Bo crosses, respectively. The recombination effect estimated for the F x Bo
crosses was negative and significant for LMY (-526±192 kg, P<0.01), DMY (-
3.0±0.4 kg, P<0.01)AMY (-349±174, P<0.05) and BW (-68±11 kg, P<0.001).
For the J x Bo crosses the recombination loss was only significant and negative
for DMY (-2.2±0.7 kg, P<0.05) and BW (-33±17, P<0.05). The direct
heritabilities (h2) and repeatabilities (r2) estimated for each trait after correcting
for the fixed environmental and breed additive and non-additive effects were
0.24±0.04 and 0.39±0.02 for LMY, 0.19±0.03 and 0.30±0.02 for DMY,
0.13±0.03 and 0.19±0.02 for LL, 0.23±0.04 and 0.37±0.02 for AMY, 0.17±0.05
and 0.39±0.02 for AMYBW and 0.10±0.03 and 0.34±0.02 for BW, respectively.
The estimated genetic correlations between AMY and LL, AMY and BW, LL
and BW were 0.71±0.08, 0.17±0.18 and 0.23±0.20, respectively.
In the fifth study, estimates of breed additive differences, heterosis and
recombination loss, as well as heritabilities were obtained for age at first calving
(AFC), calving interval (Cl), days open (DO) and number of services per
conception (SPC). The genetic parameters were estimated using a repeatability
animal model for Cl, DO and SPC and a unitrait animal model for AFC. The
overall least-squares means estimated were: 38.3±0.26 months, 435±4 days,
145±10 days and 1.58±0.03 (number) for AFC, Cl, DO and SPC, respectively.
The breed additive effects of F and J were only significant (P<0.01) for AFC.
Relative to the Bo, both the F and the J additive contributions for AFC were
-5.4±0.5 and -5.5±1.9 months, respectively. Crossing the F and J breeds with the
Bo breed also resulted in significant heterosis (P<0.05) ranging from I0ta 21%
in all traits. The estimated recombination loss was only significant for AFC
(2.8±1.0 months) for the F x Bo crosses. Heritability estimates were high for
AFC (0.44±0.05) and low for Cl (0.08±0.03), DO (0.04±0.03) and SPC
(0.08±0.02). The corresponding estimates for the repeatability (r2
) were
0.14±0.02 and 0.14±.0.02 for Cl and DO, respectively. The repeatability estimate
for SPC was zero.