• Login
    View Item 
    •   KovsieScholar Home
    • KovsieJournals
    • Perspectives in Education
    • PiE 2017 Volume 35 Issue 1
    • View Item
    •   KovsieScholar Home
    • KovsieJournals
    • Perspectives in Education
    • PiE 2017 Volume 35 Issue 1
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Internet use among university students: a reason for concern?

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    persed_v35_n1_a6.pdf (379.9Kb)
    Date
    2017
    Author
    Geyer, L. S.
    Hall, H.
    Le Roux, M. P.
    Crafford, G.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    International studies reveal that students have more freedom, as well as unstructured and unsupervised time, which makes them susceptible to problematic internet use (PIU). Although students are a risk group for PIU, no evidence of local research on internet use among students could be identified. This article reports on a study on the nature and impact of internet use among students at a tertiary institution. A quantitative research approach was adopted and a survey with a group-administered questionnaire was conducted with 295 second-year students (between 18 and 25 years) registered for a module in a basic social science. Respondents were recruited through convenience sampling. The nature of internet use was explored with reference to internet platforms, reasons for internet use, devices for connecting to the internet, and the locations where respondents access the internet. The impact of internet use was explored through eight constructs adopted from two screening instruments in the public domain, i.e. the Internet-Related Addictive Behaviour Inventory and the Problematic Internet Use Questionnaire. The research results were calculated by means of descriptive and association statistics, specifically the chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. Ethical considerations, such as informed consent and voluntary participation, were observed. The research results revealed that the respondents preferred email and chatting as internet platforms, while they used the internet mostly for extrinsic reasons, such as for assignments and socialising. Online activities occurred mostly on campus and at home during the early evenings via mobile phones or laptops. The respondents scored relatively low on the constructs measuring PIU. However, two constructs ‘escape from problems’ and ‘loss of control’ presented with markedly higher scores and could be flagged as potential risk areas. Furthermore, association statistics indicated a statistically significant difference of some constructs with regard to gender and the romantic relationship status of respondents, which could be considered in the provision of student support services. The development and evaluation of evidence-based interventions for the prevention, treatment and management of PIU are recommended.
    URI
    http://dx.doi. org/10.18820/2519593X/pie. v35i1.6
    http://hdl.handle.net/11660/8638
    Collections
    • PiE 2017 Volume 35 Issue 1

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    All of KovsieScholarCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback