PiE 2012 Volume 30 Issue 2

Permanent URI for this collection

http://hdl.handle.net/11660/2647

Browse

Browsing PiE 2012 Volume 30 Issue 2 by Subject "Higher education"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Constructive feedback as a learning tool to enhance students’ self-regulation and performance in higher education
    (Faculty of Education, University of the Free State, 2012) Du Toit, Erna
    If feedback is provided in a way that can develop students’ self-regulatory skills, it could enhance learning and, consequently, lead to improved performance. To improve teaching and learning in higher education (HE), this study sought to determine whether the feedback to first-year students affords them an opportunity to learn from it. A theoretical framework on constructive feedback, self-regulated learning and the expectations of students was synthesised from literature which formed the basis of the research. This was followed by empirical research using a questionnaire to capture students’ perspectives regarding feedback. Students experienced the feedback as not contributing towards improving their performance but are convinced that, if they receive feedback that is focused on the task level, it can improve their performance. Suggestions are provided that emphasise the need to use feedback at both task and process level as a learning tool.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    A quantitative literacy course for Humanities and Law students: the challenges of a context-based curriculum
    (Faculty of Education, University of the Free State, 2012) Frith, Vera
    This article examines some aspects of the effectiveness of a first-year course in quantitative literacy for Humanities and Law students at a South African university. This intervention is necessary to assist students in developing the appropriate quantitative competencies because there is an articulation gap between the quantitative literacy of many first-year students and the demands of their curriculum in this regard. Interventions of this kind should be integrated into the disciplinary curriculum to as great an extent as possible, primarily because quantitative literacy is a practice embedded in the disciplinary practices. Tensions involved in attempting this integration limit the course’s effectiveness and are to a large extent due to the conflicting demands on students of both the disciplinary discourses and the mathematical and statistical content. The intervention could be enhanced by being more explicit in clarifying the distinctions between the disciplinary contexts and the mathematical and statistical content, as well as by making more explicit the expectations in terms of student learning and performance in assessments.