The statutory remedy for unfair prejudice in South African company law
Article Multilingual record · 2 languages
View this record in
Viewing available metadata in English
Abstract
English
The convergence of world economies as a result of globalisation calls for
jurisprudential review relating to shareholder rights in various jurisdictions. Most
countries, including South Africa, base the protection of minority shareholders on
common law as well as “home-grown” legislation. Among its shareholder remedies,
South African law provides the statutory remedy for unfair prejudice, also known as the
“oppression remedy”. The remedy enables shareholders to seek judicial intervention
when their corporate interests are jeopardized often by their majority counterparts.
In the past, dissatisfied minority shareholders have utilised this remedy. This article
considers whether the development of the remedy from its initial introduction in
South African company law has been beneficial to shareholders. The author traces
the history of the remedy to the Companies Act 46 of 1926 and its subsequent
amendment in the Companies Act 61 of 1973 and Companies Act 71 of 2008,
respectively. Recommendations on how the remedy can be further improved from
its current form are also made.
Keywords
English
Shareholder rights Minority shareholders South African company law Oppression remedy Unfair prejudice Companies Act 46 of 1926 Companies Act 61 of 1973 Companies Act 71 of 2008