Short- vs long-term vs the middle-ground in critical socioeconomic and environmental planning

dc.contributor.authorDhansay, Taufeeq
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-14T06:58:52Z
dc.date.available2022-11-14T06:58:52Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractRoman Krznaric’s The Good Ancestor provides an account of how temporal thinking drives critical global planning. In particular, Krznaric denotes the effect of extensive short-term thinking, i.e. thinking driven by achieving goals in a present-day sense or a singular generational time frame. These goals may include garnering socio-political advocacy and those agendas driven by tangible economic and financial gains. Furthermore, Krznaric highlights how shortterm thinking and policy developed with these kinds of considerations have a negative impact on the earth’s natural environment.en_ZA
dc.description.versionPublisher's versionen_ZA
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.18820/24150479/aa54i1/10
dc.identifier.citationDhansay, T. (2022). Short- vs long-term vs the middle-ground in critical socioeconomic and environmental planning. Acta Academica, 54(1), 148-153. http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/24150479/aa54i1/10en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn2415-0479
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11660/11954
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherUniversity of the Free Stateen_ZA
dc.rights.holderAuthor(s)en_ZA
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectCommentaryen_ZA
dc.subjectThe Good Ancestoren_ZA
dc.subjectRoman Krznaricen_ZA
dc.titleShort- vs long-term vs the middle-ground in critical socioeconomic and environmental planningen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
academ_v54_n1_a10.pdf
Size:
75.17 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.76 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: