Short- vs long-term vs the middle-ground in critical socioeconomic and environmental planning
dc.contributor.author | Dhansay, Taufeeq | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-14T06:58:52Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-11-14T06:58:52Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.description.abstract | Roman Krznaric’s The Good Ancestor provides an account of how temporal thinking drives critical global planning. In particular, Krznaric denotes the effect of extensive short-term thinking, i.e. thinking driven by achieving goals in a present-day sense or a singular generational time frame. These goals may include garnering socio-political advocacy and those agendas driven by tangible economic and financial gains. Furthermore, Krznaric highlights how shortterm thinking and policy developed with these kinds of considerations have a negative impact on the earth’s natural environment. | en_ZA |
dc.description.version | Publisher's version | en_ZA |
dc.identifier | http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/24150479/aa54i1/10 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Dhansay, T. (2022). Short- vs long-term vs the middle-ground in critical socioeconomic and environmental planning. Acta Academica, 54(1), 148-153. http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/24150479/aa54i1/10 | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn | 2415-0479 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11660/11954 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_ZA |
dc.publisher | University of the Free State | en_ZA |
dc.rights.holder | Author(s) | en_ZA |
dc.rights.license | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.subject | Commentary | en_ZA |
dc.subject | The Good Ancestor | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Roman Krznaric | en_ZA |
dc.title | Short- vs long-term vs the middle-ground in critical socioeconomic and environmental planning | en_ZA |
dc.type | Article | en_ZA |