"De overval": aanslag op Suid-Afrikaanse biblioteek in Amsterdam

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Date
2013
Authors
Terblanche, H. O.
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Faculty of Humanities, University of the Free State
Abstract
The South African Institute (SAI) on Keizersgracht 141, Amsterdam, was seen as the most important library on the subject of South Africa in Europe. It had a comprehensive collection of Africana, dating back to the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. On January 19, 1984, more than 50 young people, wearing black stockings over their heads, forced their way into the building. They wreaked havoc. Bookshelves were pulled over and books and documents, and the building façade were splashed with “paint and oil bombs”. Hundreds of books were hurled into the adjacent canal. A radical group of anti-apartheid protestors, calling themselves “Amsterdammers against racism and discrimination”, claimed responsibility for the library’s destruction. They declared that the institute supported apartheid. For them the library was primarily a symbol of repressive ideals and hated policy. They destroyed the library because, according to them, the Dutch government was dragging its feet over the issue of condemning South Africa and breaking off contact. In South Africa, newspapers responded to the attack on the library with outrage and moral indignation. Dutch newspapers also decried the incident as violent and senseless. Even the Dutch anti-apartheid organisations were critical of the vandalism. The library was, ironically, also used by vocal opponents of apartheid. It also contained works which were forbidden in South Africa.
Description
Keywords
Amsterdam, Nederlands-Zuidafrikaanse Vereniging (NZAV), South African Institute (SAI), Anti-apartheid movement, Keizersgracht 141, Cultural relations, Political violence, “Amsterdammers against racism and discrimination”, Destruction of books
Citation
Terblanche, H. O. (2013). "De overval": aanslag op Suid-Afrikaanse biblioteek in Amsterdam. Journal for Contemporary History, 38(1), 41-61.