Clinical legal education: the assessment of student collaboration and group work
Loading...
Date
Authors
Du Plessis, M. A.
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Faculty of Law, University of the Free State
Abstract
Showing abstract in English
English: Clinical legal education (CLE) should be a mandatory or core course in the LLB
curriculum and the focus of a university law clinic must be CLE, namely student
training. A recurring assessment challenge is large student numbers. The best
solution was found in grouping students together in student firms for collaborative
work; this also has strong educational benefits. When assessing students working
in collaboration, a fair assessment strategy must be employed, as all group
members receive the same mark. Clinicians must develop and implement clear
grading criteria, in the form of rubrics, which will enable them to grade numerous
assignments consistently and fairly. Peer and self‑assessment are considered
to allow for individual marks in addition to the group mark. Models of firm and
group‑work assessment and marking criteria are suggested. The use of both
collaboration and rubrics can simplify the grading process, which allows clinicians
to conduct multiple assessments and feedback consistently and fairly. Samples of
a number of rubrics and surveys are provided.
Description
Citation
du Plessis, M. A. (2014). Clinical legal education: The assessment of student collaboration and group work. Journal for Juridical Science, 39(2), 67-91.