Reflections on drawing
| dc.contributor.author | Schmidt, Leoni | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-03-07T06:54:12Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-03-07T06:54:12Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This article is presented in three parts. An introduction considers the current emphasis on drawing within the visual arts and literacy debate. An analysis is then offered of key strategies and counter-strategies (including trajectories and cornerstones) in the recent history of drawing as a complex arts practice predicated on different and often contestatory assumptions about how we understand and visualise our world. The third section explores connections between drawing and registers for visual communication and literacy, with specific attention to Umberto Eco's semiotic typology of modes of sign production. | en_ZA |
| dc.description.version | Publisher's version | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.citation | Schmidt, L. (2006). Reflections on drawing. Communitas, 11, 53-63. | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1023-0556 (print) | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2415-0525 (online) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11660/7947 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_ZA |
| dc.publisher | Department of Communication Science, University of the Free State | en_ZA |
| dc.rights.holder | Department of Communication Science, University of the Free State | en_ZA |
| dc.subject | Drawing | en_ZA |
| dc.subject | History of drawing | en_ZA |
| dc.subject | Visual communication | en_ZA |
| dc.subject | Literacy | en_ZA |
| dc.title | Reflections on drawing | en_ZA |
| dc.type | Article | en_ZA |