Engagement of prosecutors not in the employ of the National Prosecuting Authority
Article Multilingual record · 2 languages
View this record in
Viewing available metadata in English
Abstract
English
This article focuses on the engagement of prosecutors not in the employ of the
National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) to prosecute certain cases. Such prosecutors
are appointed in terms of section 38 of the National Prosecuting Authority Act 32
of 1998. The article starts by presenting a number of recent court decisions
that dealt with the application of this section and contextualises the decision of
the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) in Moussa v S. Given that it was in Moussa
that the constitutionality of the section was challenged, the approach of the SCA
and the reasons for its decision are discussed. It is submitted that the SCA’s
decision is a welcome step, in that the court has pronounced itself definitively
on the constitutionality of the section and also outlined the approach to be used
in determining which appointments of prosecutors, in terms of the section, are
acceptable and which are not. In particular, the article explains the test to be used
in making that decision.
Keywords
English
National Prosecuting Authority National Prosecuting Authority Act 32 of 1998 Moussa v S