Doubts raised on the validity of construction and payment guarantees
Loading...
Date
Authors
Maritz, Tinus
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University of the Free State
Abstract
Showing abstract in English
English: It has become common practice in the building industry for contractors to
provide employers with a construction guarantee. These guarantees, which
are defined as being on call or on demand, usually provide that a certificate
issued by the agent or the principal agent will provide conclusive proof that
the employer is entitled to call in the guarantee (Fenster, 1998). In a number
of recent decisions, such a conclusive proof provision has been the subject of
judicial scrutiny, and there is now an ever-increasing doubt as to the validity of
these guarantees.
The Joint Building Contracts Committee (JBCC) 1991 suite of contracts was
the first in South Africa to introduce the concept of construction and payment
guarantees that provided the requisite cover available on call from approved
financial institutions. In the process the construction guarantee replaced the
performance guarantee (surety) that prevailed in addition to the retention fund
in construction contracts. Various standard forms, which embodied the terms
and conditions of the guarantees, were prepared for this purpose by the JBCC.
These terms and conditions had been negotiated by the JBCC with the legal/
technical committees of the banking and insurance institutions and were fully
approved by them. However, for some time now concerns have been raised
regarding the difficulties experienced in getting all banks and/or their property
finance divisions to comply with the JBCC guarantees. Because the construction
and payment guarantees are so closely linked to the terms and conditions of
the JBCC principal and nominated/selected subcontract agreements, changes
made to the pro forma guarantees or agreements, which disturb the risk of the
guarantor, could very well render the guarantee null and void.
This article will report the interpretation of construction and payment guarantees
as held in recent court decisions, the findings of an investigation conducted
on perceived problems being experienced by the South African construction
industry with regard to these guarantees, and will present what is considered to
be best practice to ensuring the continued effective use thereof.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Maritz, T. (2011). Doubts raised on the validity of construction and payment guarantees. Acta Structilia, 18(1), 1-26.