Masters Degrees (Exercise and Sport Sciences)

Permanent URI for this collection

http://hdl.handle.net/11660/265

Browse

Browsing Masters Degrees (Exercise and Sport Sciences) by Subject "Barefoot sprinting"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Biomechanical analysis of foot contact in junior sprinters
    (University of the Free State, 2011) Hugo, Elmie; Coetzee, F. F.; Opperman, M. C.
    English: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of different foot types (normal, flat and high arch) with regards to speed, roll-over and impact forces, thus attempting to indicate if a specific foot type is dominant amongst sprinters. The different foot types of ten junior sprint athletes and ten nonsprinters were determined by walking over a pressure platform (RSscan International’s Footscan® 7.x plate system). The effects of foot roll-over and peak pressures during sprinting were determined for left and right feet respectively. The subjects ran barefoot at their top speed (sprinted) over 20 meters, crossing a pressure platform (RSscan International’s Footscan® 7.x plate system) comprising the last two meters of the 20 meter distance. The initial contact, final contact, time to peak pressure and the duration of contact of the different sub-areas of the foot were measured. The results of the sprinters’ trials were averaged and compared to the non-sprinters’ averaged trials by performing a statistical T-test. The control group (non-sprinters) dominantly has a high arch foot type for both feet. In the sprinter group, the different foot types are all represented almost equally with regards to right feet, whereas the left feet are dominantly normal type, followed by high arch and then flat foot types. There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) during the Foot flat phase (FFP) between the sprinter group (mean left: 4.04ms, mean right: 4.34ms) and control group (mean left: 26.40ms, mean right: 24.46ms), left: p=0.007; right: p=0.022. This indicates that the FFP time is significantly faster for the sprinter group than for the control group. The control group spent a higher percentage of time on the rear foot than the sprinters did (left: p=0.0057, right: p=0.0268). The control group’s peak plantar pressures were predominantly on the sub-areas of the heel (mean:HL=Left: 327.69, right: 351.44; mean HM= Left: 434.08, right: 423.19) and M1, M2, M3, whereas the sprinters’ peak plantar pressures are predominantly on the subareas of the M1, M2, M3, mid-foot and T1, meaning that sprinters predominantly have peak pressures on forefoot contact whereas the nonsprinters predominantly have peak pressures on heel contact. The results of this study therefore indicate that in general, sprinters dominantly have a normal foot type whereas the non-sprinters have a high arch foot type, and sprinters predominantly have peak pressures on forefoot contact whereas the non-sprinters predominantly have peak pressures on heel contact during sprints.