Doctoral Degrees (Soil, Crop and Climate Sciences)

Permanent URI for this collection

http://hdl.handle.net/11660/466

Browse

Browsing Doctoral Degrees (Soil, Crop and Climate Sciences) by Advisor "du Preez, C. C."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Evaluation of selected industrially manufactured biological amendments for maize production
    (University of the Free State, 2012-09) Baloyi, Tlangelani Cedric; du Preez, C. C.; Kutu, F. R.
    The soaring prices of inorganic fertilisers among other reasons has persuaded companies to commence producing biological enhanced substances herein refers as industrially manufactured biological amendments (IMBAs) with claims that they could increase crop growth and yield, and also revitalize the soil. Such claims are often without substantial empirical agronomic data to proof the efficacy of these IMBAs. A glasshouse pot trial was conducted during 2008/09 season to assess the effects of graded rates of nine IMBAs (Biozone, Gliogrow, Gromor, Promis, Growmax, Crop care, K-humate, Lanbac and Montys) on maize seedlings establishment and growth over six-weeks. These were assessed at 50, 75 and 100% of the recommended rates together with optimum inorganic NPK fertiliser and a control as check. The IMBAs exerted in many instances a deleterious effect on percent maize seedling emergences when applied at 100% rate. Application rates of 50 and 75% appeared sufficient amongst most IMBAs for encouraging better growth and phenological development of maize, although the most appropriate rate is dependent on the IMBA type. Rainfed trials were conducted for three seasons (2006/07-2008/09) at four localities (Bethlehem, Bothaville, Ottosdal and Potchefstroom) to assess the effects of the same nine IMBAs used above on maize performance and on soil health in a randomised completely block design. The IMBAs were applied based on product manufactures and/or supplier recommendations along with optimum inorganic NPK rate and the unamended control as check. All trial sites were planted to one maize cultivar PAN 6479. Every season, observations on phenological growth traits, grain yield and yield components, nitrogen and phosphorus content, uptake, and agronomic use efficiency, soil chemical and microbial properties and on grain quality traits were measured. The manure-based IMBAs like Gromor, Promis and Growmax generally raised pH (H2O) to between 6.0 and 7.0 which was not always the case with the other IMBAs that coincided with inorganic NPK fertiliser. Generally, Gromor and Gliogrow recorded most cases of significant pH increases compared to the NPK treatment. The frequency of significant increases in organic C, mineral N and extractable P were only four instances and less of all 12 potential cases in relation to the NPK check. Gromor resulted in no cases of significantly higher mineral N and extractable P than the NPK check. The IMBAs promoted higher microbial biomass-C immobilisation at 4-weeks after planting while biomass-C mineralisation was predominant at flowering and crop harvest, although it tended to decline at crop harvest. The different IMBAs exerted in many instances no significant effect on biomass-C and -P compared to the NPK check. The IMBAs had no positive effect on maize growth and phenological traits compared with the NPK treatment. Application of Gliogrow resulted in constant reduction in plant phenological growth in the 9th leaf and silking growth stages due to poor emergence, particularly from soils with higher clay content. Gromor and Promis exerted no significant positive effect on grain yield and yield components compared to the NPK check. Despite the consistent poor stand count, Gliogrow resulted in significant increases for all the yield parameters measured than any other IMBA. Compared to the NPK check, the IMBAs resulted also in few cases of significant increases on harvest index while no positive significant effect was observed on cob length. Treatments with Biozone, Gliogrow and Promis at 9th leaf, Gliogrow and K-humate at silking, and Biozone and K-humate at harvesting significantly increased plant N content and uptake at the respective growth stages. None of the IMBAs exerted a significant effect on the agronomic use of the applied N compared to the applied N from the NPK check, except in one case with Promis. The P content and uptake recorded at 9th leaf, silking, and harvesting increased significantly in three to four instances due to the application of Promis, Growmax and Montys. The efficiency of applied P from the IMBAs was not in one case significantly better than the applied P from the NPK check. Application of Gliogrow, Crop care and Lanbac significantly increased thousand kernel mass in two to three cases, and milling index in two to seven cases in comparison with the NPK check. Gliogrow gave solely significantly higher percentage of >11 mm, and 10-11 mm kernels than the NPK check. Equally, Gromor gave significantly higher percentage of 8-9 mm kernels, and Growmax of 7-8 mm kernels.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    On-farm management of salinity associated with irrigation for the Orange-Riet and Vaalharts schemes
    (University of the Free State, 2013-07) Barnard, Johannes Hendrikus; van Rensburg, L. D.; du Preez, C. C.
    Salinity associated with irrigation is and will remain a major obstacle for farmers in most semi-arid regions throughout the world, like the Orange-Riet and Vaalharts Irrigation Schemes in South Africa. On-farm water and salt management should, therefore, be continually evaluated and/or improved. Especially in water table soils where the saturated zone within or just below the potential root zone is not stagnant and lateral flow occurs to lower lying areas and/or artificial drainage systems, which present unique management complexities. Hence, the aim of this study was to evaluate and/or improve on-farm water and salt management of irrigated field crops grown under these conditions. To accomplish this aim the following best water and salt management practices were formulated from literature, i.e. i) use of efficient irrigation systems, ii) introduce scheduling practices that optimize water and salt applications and reduce drainage losses, iii) utilize shallow water tables as a source of water for crop water requirements and iv) monitor root zone salinity to decide when to apply controlled, irrigation-induced leaching for salt removal. Some of these practices were evaluated on a case study basis on two farms within the Orange-Riet and Vaalharts Irrigation Schemes by comparing them to current water and salt management practices. Some aspects of this comparison are difficult to accomplish under field conditions. Supplementing field measurements with mathematical modeling was, therefore, critical to the successful completion of the study. This, however, presented some difficulties because most models require extensive effort to determine input variables and unambiguous numerical model parameters. From the multitude of available models, the Soil WAter Management Program, SWAMP, was selected. According to the aggregated accuracy, correlation and pattern analysis (ISWAMP) of SWAMP, it was found that water uptake of wheat, peas and maize from non-saline water table soils was simulated well (>70%). Consequently it was shown that the soil water balance under fluctuating water table conditions at field level can be solved successfully by SWAMP with limited easily obtainable input variables. This was accomplished by optimizing simply measured in situ field observations, which is vital towards the successful evaluation of water and salt management by irrigation farmers in the region. However, in order to truly revise on-farm water and salt management practices, mathematical models that can simulate the dynamic response of crops to both water (matric) and salt (osmotic) stress are required. A salinity subroutine for SWAMP was, therefore, developed and validated, i.e. mathematical algorithms that can simulate upward and downward salt movement in water table soils according to the cascading principle, and the effect of osmotic stress on water uptake and yield according to the layer water supply rate approach. It was found that SWAMP was able to simulate the accumulation of salt within the root zone above the water table due to irrigation and capillary rise well, and consequently simulate the effect on crop yield. This was possible because SWAMP was able to successfully (ISWAMP > 70%) simulate a reduction in water uptake during the growing season of field crops due to osmotic stress. Consequently SWAMP was used in the case study to solve the water and salt balances of two irrigated fields over four growing seasons and investigate whether the farmers employed best water and salt management practices, using different scheduling approaches. It was concluded that with both centre pivots, crop water stress was prevented, therefore, apparently detracting from the merits of irrigation scheduling. However, it was possible to conserve 20% of irrigation water using scientific based objective, compared to intuitive subjective scheduling, while at the same time also reducing salt additions considerably. Despite less irrigation due to objective scheduling, almost all of the applied salt was still leached into the water table. This was because the presence of a water table within or just below the potential root zone limits storage for rainfall and/or irrigation above the capillary fringe, hence presenting favorable leaching conditions. Since the water below the water table, at both fields, was not stagnant, lateral flow of water through the saturated zone was responsible for removal of the salts. This continual removal of salt is generally not considered good practice because ideally salt must be allowed to accumulate and only periodically leached during high rainfall events and/or fallow periods. Although both scheduling approaches resulted in similar yields, better on-farm water and salt management was achieved with scientific objective scheduling. In doing so farmers can address the environmental problems associated with irrigation, i.e. degradation of water resources due to uncontrolled leaching while achieving similar yields using less water.