Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLategan, L. O. K.
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-05T11:05:36Z
dc.date.available2017-10-05T11:05:36Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.identifier.citationLategan, L. O. K. (2002). 'n Kritiese evaluering van die kompromie as etiese figuur in die teologiese etiek van J. Douma, J.A. Heyns, S.J. Ridderbos en W.H. Velema. Acta Theologica, 22(1), 57-76.af
dc.identifier.issn1015-8758 (print)
dc.identifier.issn2309-9089 (online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11660/7145
dc.description.abstractAlthough the concept of a compromise is known in ethics, very little attention has been paid to the meaning of this concept in Reformed Ethics. In this article the author looks into the meaning of the compromise in the theological-ethical frameworks of J. Douma, J.A. Heyns, S.J. Ridderbos and W.H. Velema. In analysing this concept, it is pointed out that a compromise has to do with the choice between two conflicting norms in a borderline situation. In a borderline situation these norms are in conflict with each other and a conflict of interest is created. It then necessitates a choice between one of the norms in a borderline situation. To this choice is then referred to as a choice between the lesser of two evils. This is where the compromise comes into play.en_ZA
dc.language.isoafaf
dc.publisherFaculty of Theology, University of the Free Stateen_ZA
dc.subjectTheological ethicsen_ZA
dc.subjectReformed ethicsen_ZA
dc.subjectCompromiseen_ZA
dc.title'n Kritiese evaluering van die kompromie as etiese figuur in die teologiese etiek van J. Douma, J.A. Heyns, S.J. Ridderbos en W.H. Velemaaf
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
dc.description.versionPublisher's versionen_ZA
dc.rights.holderFaculty of Theology, University of the Free Stateen_ZA


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record