• Login
    View Item 
    •   KovsieScholar Home
    • KovsieJournals
    • Journal for Contemporary History
    • JCH 2016 Volume 41 Issue 1
    • View Item
    •   KovsieScholar Home
    • KovsieJournals
    • Journal for Contemporary History
    • JCH 2016 Volume 41 Issue 1
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    African solutions for African problems: quiet diplomacy and South Africa's diplomatic strategy towards Zimbabwe

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    contemp_v41_n1_a7.pdf (322.1Kb)
    Date
    2016
    Author
    Landsberg, Chris
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Zimbabwe is not just a foreign policy issue for South Africa; it has become a domestic policy concern. Political, socio-economic and cultural issues have coalesced in a manner that have forced the Zimbabwe question onto the domestic agenda, and South Africa has opted to respond to the Zimbabwe challenge by way of the foreign policy strategy of “quiet diplomacy” as a form of “African solutions for African problems”. This policy was associated with South Africa’s former president, Thabo Mbeki, but contrary to popular perceptions, the Nelson Mandela and Jacob Zuma governments also supported this strategy, even though they claimed that they distanced themselves from it. Six years after Mbeki’s departure as head of state, and into the Jacob Zuma-led presidency, the claim that there was a fundamental break with the policy of quiet diplomacy by Zuma, and that his administration pursued a fundamentally different strategy to that of his predecessor, was far-fetched. This article considers the concept of quiet diplomacy, initially seen as a form of African containment, representing methods used to first try and stop conflicts from spiralling out of control; secondly by reversing the effects of conflicts; and thirdly by rolling back conflicts by means of peaceful settlements of disputes or peace settlements; after which a country could be stabilised politically, and socioeconomically. The analysis then traces Jacob Zuma’s approach towards Zimbabwe and how his new administration came to endorse and support the 2008 Global Political Agreement (GPA), which they inherited from the Mbeki government, despite the rhetoric calling for a different approach.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11660/4441
    http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/24150509/jch.v41i1.7
    Collections
    • JCH 2016 Volume 41 Issue 1

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    All of KovsieScholarCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback