blSo 85791< :i,..r.'.or_'''-=-~.h'- .....-.r.fX>_.,,~_.~..I.:::'O~ "~~~.:'" ",~.,,,,,,,·,·,.....,..t.,~~tI'-~~ ... ; .. ,....~unHIEr:D!E Ei<5fr-~H_;\J::.q l"ln(i ONDEé? ~ Li\~.E_.r,~!,; ''\' ~·..'),,:,">;~'-'Cl•\.1•.\.l.i)IC-I',:-r-.:· urr 'Y"-~l,. "LUC \..: "tt. J tUC"l)P:• OL,I()·J"~Lf··.-..j·( '\;";:'-:_"'0\, "'-'"\. '-'"Et."'P' ;\ wI,V'oJf\'uo.;. Nl'I"..:..Iq:I'!!tJ~."",c. •• ~v..-~ .. o.r'.A:t;..~ ••_'o:ao.o ....?'tI;Q:I..on_.~..t:4_""II'''.~!SIa._:;r.1'\~J University Free State 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 34300003440520 Universiteit Vrystaat EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF IMPLEMENTION OF THE PRACTICAL APPROACH TO LUNG HEALTH (PALSA) IN THE FREE STATE BOSIELO PHILLlP MAJARA A thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Community Health at the University of the Free State. February 2005 Promoters: Prof G Joubert, University of the Free State, South Africa Prof OM Bachmann, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK I declare that the thesis hereby submitted by me for the Doctor of Philosophy degree at the University of the Free State is my own independent work and has not previously been submitted by me at another University/Faculty. I furthermore cede copyright of the thesis in favour of the University of the Free State BOSIELO PHILLlP MAJARA ii SUMMARY Currently, respiratory diseases constitute about one third of patients that present to primary care clinics in under-resourced countries of the world. Communicable respiratory diseases such as tuberculosis, acute respiratory infections in adults and non-communicable respiratory diseases such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer represent about one-fifth of the global burden of disease measured in disability adjusted life years (DALY). Opportunistic infections, other respiratory complications, and the widespread use of tobacco further increase the respiratory disease burden in high HIV prevalence settings. In developing countries clinic nurses with limited training and basic skills are entrusted to properly diagnose and treat respiratory patients from overloaded clinics. We developed an educational outreach intervention, Practical Approach to Lung Health in South Africa (PALSA) on integrated respiratory case management aimed at improving the quality of respiratory care in South African primary care clinics. The intervention comprised 3 to 4 academic detailing training sessions of primary care nursing practitioners; dissemination of locally adapted PALSA guidelines and support materials; changes in prescribing provisions for primary care nurses, and doctors' sensitization about PALSA. The impact of PALSA on the processes and outcomes of respiratory care was evaluated through a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial in the Free State province in 2003. A total of 1000 patients in the intervention arm and 999 patients in the control arm presenting with respiratory conditions to the 40 largest primary care clinics of the Free State province were interviewed at the first post-intervention survey. The number of patients recruited ranged from 47 to 52 patients per clinic. The follow- iii up rate was 92.9% for the intervention arm and 92.7% for the control arm. Twenty two patients died in the intervention clinics and twenty six died in the control clinics. During data analysis, four patients in each arm were deleted due to unavailability of the first post-intervention survey data and/or because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Professional nurses in intervention clinics received a median of 2 training sessions while nurses in the control clinic received nothing. First post-intervention survey characteristics of the intervention and control arms balanced as a result of randomization. Almost two thirds of the patients were females with the most frequent age group being 25-54 years. About 50% of patients had a smoking history, about 50% had primary education, close to 50% were unemployed, above 80% walked to get to the nearest clinic and 70% spent between 2 and 12 hours to travel to and from the clinic. The inclusion criteria to the study were adults 15 years and older presenting with a cough or difficulty breathing on the day of the interview, recurrent cough or difficulty breathing in the last 6 months or cough for less than two weeks with any of the four severity markers. Rates of cough and difficulty breathing ranged between 70% and 90%. About 70% of the patients complained about chest symptoms interfering with their usual activities while around 36% had gone to the clinic for a check-up on recurrent respiratory problem. Compared to control clinics, intervention clinics had a significant improvement in inhaled steroid prescription of 16.1% versus 10.3% (odds ratio 1.70; 95%CI 1.13 to 2.56), and an improvement in sending of sputa for tuberculosis testing of 16.7% versus 11.2% (odds ratio 1.60; 95%CI 1.00 to 2.54). There were also significant improvements seen on appropriate referral of patients that had one of the four severity makers of 10.6% versus 4.9% (odds ratio 2.56; 95%CI 1.06 to 6.17), and close to significant improvement of the tuberculosis detection rate of 3.0% versus 1.8% (odds ratio 1.67; 95%CI 0.92 to 3.02). There was a significant iv increase in interference with usual activities due to chest symptoms of 68.0% versus 60.1% (odds ratio 1.44; 95%CI1.13 to 1.85). There was no improvement on antibiotic prescription of 36.1% versus 38.0% (odds ratio 0.92; 95%CI 0.62 to 1.36) as well as cotrimoxazole prophylaxis of 12.6% versus 9.9% (odds ratio 1.52; 95%CI 0.60 to 3.89). Results of this study suggest that inhaled steroid prescription, tuberculosis case detection rate, and appropriate referral of patients with severe respiratory diseases can be improved in nurse staffed primary care clinics in developing countries and under-resourced settings. This study exemplifies an evaluation of the effectiveness of an educational intervention in South African primary care. It shows how a carefully developed intervention, using a syndromic approach to diagnosis and treatment, can improve several aspects of clinical care after brief training of primary care nurses. It also illustrates opportunities for, and difficulties in, implementing such an intervention, and conducting a large scale trial in this setting. This study suggests that other international interventions based on dissemination of clinical guidelines, such as, for IMCI, STls and HIV/AIDS should be developed and rigorously evaluated locally, given their potential impact on public health and on services. v OPSOMMING Respiratoriese siektes is tans verantwoordelik vir ongeveer 'n derde van die pasiënte wat aanmeld by primêre sorg klinieke in hulpbron-arm lande van die wêreld. Oordraagbare respiratoriese siektes soos tuberkulose, akute respiratoriese infeksies in volwassenes en nie-oordraagbare respiratoriese siektes soos asma, chroniese obstruktiewe pulmonêre siekte, longkanker verteenwoordig een vyfde van die globale siektelas gemeet aan gestremdheids- aangepaste lewensjare. Opportunistiese infeksies, ander respiratoriese komplikasies, en die algemene gebruik van tabak vehoog die respiratoriese seiktelas verder in omgewings met 'n hoë MIV voorkoms. In ontwikkelende lande word van kliniekverpleegkundiges met beperkte opleiding en basiese vaardighede verwag om respiratoriese pasiënte korrek te diagnoseer en te behandel in oorlaaide klinieke. Ons het 'n opvoedkundige uitreik intervensie, Practical Approach to Lung Health in South Africa (PALSA) ontwikkel, gemik op geïntegreerde respiratoriese gevalshantering om die kwaliteit van respiratoriese sorg in Suid-Afrikaanse primêre sorg klinieke te verbeter. Die intervensie het bestaan uit 3 tot 4 opleidingsessies vir pnmere sorg verpleegkundiges, verspreiding van plaaslik aangepaste PALSA riglyne en ondersteuningsmateriaal; veranderinge in voorskrifbepalings vir primêre sorg verpleegkundiges, en sensitisering van dokters aangaande PALSA. Die impak van PALSA op die prosesse en uitkomste van respiratoriese sorg is geëvalueer deur 'n pragmatiese bundel gerandomiseerde gekontrolleerde proef in die Vrystaat provinsie in 2003. 'n Totaal van 1000 pasiënte in die intervensie-arm en 999 pasiënte in die kontrole-arm wat met respiratoriese toestande presenteer by die 40 grootste primêre sorg klinieke in die Vrystaat, is tydens die eerste post-intervensie vi opname ondervra. Die aantal pasiënte gewerf per kliniek het van 47 tot 52 pasiënte gewissel. Die opvolgkoerse was 92.9% in die intervensie-arm en 92.7% in die kontrole-arm. Twee-en-twintig pasiënte is in die intervensie-klinieke oorlede en ses-en-twintig in die kontrole-klinieke. Gedurende data-ontleding, is vier pasiënte in elke arm uitgesluit weens onbeskikbaarheid van aanvanklike post- intervensie data en/of omdat hulle nie aan die insluitingskriteria voldoen het nie. Professionele verpleegkundiges in die intervensie-klinieke het In mediaan van 2 opleidingsessies ontvang terwyl verpleegkundiges in die kontrole klinieke geen intervensie ontvang het nie. Die aanvanklike post-intervensie eienskappe van die intervensie- en kontrole- arms was soortgelyk as gevolg van die randomisasie. Bykans twee derdes van die pasiënte was vroulik, met die mees algemene ouderdomsgroep 25-54 jaar. Ongeveer 50% van pasiënte het In rookgeskiedenis, ongeveer 50% het primêre skoolopleiding, ongeveer 50% was werkloos, meer as 80% het gestap om by die naaste kliniek te kom, en 70% bestee tussen 2 en 12 ure om na en van die kliniek te reis. Die insluitingskriteria vir die studie was volwassenes 15 jaar en ouer wat presenteer met 'n hoes of moeilike asemhaling op die dag van die onderhoud, herhaalde hoes of moeilike asemhaling in die afgelope 6 maande of hoes van minder as twee weke met enige van die vier ernstige merkers. Koerse vir hoes en moeilike asemhaling het gevarieer tussen 70% en 90%. Ongeveer 70% van die pasiënte het gekla oor borssimptome wat inmeng met hulle gewone aktiwiteite terwylongeveer 36% na die kliniek gegaan het vir 'n ondersoek vir herhaalde respiratoriese probleme. Vergeleke met kontrole-klinieke het intervensie-klinieke In betekenisvolle verbetering in die voorskryf van geïnhaleerde steroïede (16.1% versus 10.3%, kansverhouding 1.70, 95%VI 1.13 tot 2.56), en In verbetering in die stuur van vii sputa vir tuberkulosetoesting (16.7% versus 11.2%, kansverhouding 1.60, 95%VI 1.00 tot 2.54) getoon. Daar was ook betekenisvolle verbeterings in toepaslike verwysings van pasiënte met een of meer van die vier ernstige merkers (10.6% versus 4.9%, kansverhouding 2.56, 95%VI1.06 tot 6.17), en na aan betekenisvol vir die tuberkulose-opsporingskoers (3.0% versus 1.8%, kansverhouding 1.67, 95%VI 0.92 tot 3.02). Daar was 'n betekenisvolle verhoging in die inmenging van borssimptome met gewone aktiwiteite (68.0% versus 60.1%, kansverhouding 1.44, 95%VI 1.13 tot 1.85). Daar was geen verbetering in antibiotika-voorskrifte nie (36.1% versus 38.0%, kansverhouding 0.92, 95%VI 0.62 tot 1.36) en ook nie vir cotrimoxazole profilakse nie (12.6% versus 9.9%, kansverhouding 1.52, 95%VI 0.60 tot 3.89). Resultate van hierdie studie dui daarop dat geïnhaleerde steroïedvoorskrifte, die tuberkulose gevalsopsporingskoers en die toepaslike verwysing van pasiënte met ernstige respiratoriese siektes verbeter kan word in primêre gesondheidsorgklinieke beman deur verpleegkundiges in ontwikkelende lande en hulpron-arm omgewings. Hierdie studie dien as voorbeeld van 'n evaluering van die effektiwiteit van 'n opoedkundige intervensie in Suid-Afrikaanse primêre sorg. Dit wys hoe 'n deeglik ontwerpte intervensie wat gebruik maak van 'n sindromiese benadering tot diagnose en behandeling, na kort opleiding van primêre sorg verpleegkundiges verskeie aspekte van kliniese sorg kan verbeter. Dit toon ook die geleenthede vir en probleme verbonde aan die implementering van sodanige intervensie en die uitvoer van 'n grootskaalse proef in hierdie omgewing. Hierdie studie dui daarop dat ander internasionale intervensies gebaseer op die verspreiding van kliniese riglyne, soos IMCI, SOS en MIVNIGS plaaslik ontwikkel moet word en noukeurig plaaslik ge-evalueer moet word gegewe hulle potensiële impak op publieke gesondheid en op dienste. viii Key terms: Academic detailing Cluster randomized controlled trial Effectiveness Evaluation Guidelines Multifaceted intervention Practical approach to lung health in South Africa (PALSA) Primary respiratory care Respiratory conditions Tuberculosis ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First I would like to thank both the previous and current Heads of Community Health Department of the University of the Free State, Professor Max Bachmann and Professor Willem Kruger respectively, and the department's academic/technical and administrative staff for providing me with office space, morale and administrative support during the conduct of my studies. Secondly, I would like to thank my two PhD supervisors, Professor Gina Joubert and Professor Max Bachmann for the guidance that they provided me with, from the inception of the PhD protocol, data collection, cleaning, analysis and report writing. I truly am grateful to both of you. I would also like to thank all the PALSA research team members for their valuable contribution to the entire PALSA project implementation, especially the team leader, Professor Eric Bateman, for mobilizing all resources required for smooth implementation of the project in a form of human, financial and material. Due thanks is also extended to Doctors Rene English and Lara Fairall, my two colleagues in the junior researchers cadre of the PALSA researchers lineup, for their valuable contribution in producing the locally adapted PALSA guidelines, and other intervention materials of the project. Due thanks is particularly directed to Doctor Lara Fairall for all the effort that she put into the randomized controlled trial in the Free State, especially the clinical input into the entire study. I really am indebted to the two of you. Thanks is also extended to Dr. Merrick Zwarenstein for initiating the project, providing technical support during implementation as well as securing initial funding to support my local needs and requirements throughout my stay in the Free State. Thanks is also extended to authorities of the Government of the Republic of South Africa, national and Free State provincial governments for allowing the research team to utilize public resources in a form of clinics and clinic staff while x implementing the project. Of outmost importance are the former National TB Manager, Dr. R Matji, Free State Provincial Health Department authorities, namely, Dr. V Litlhakanyane, (Head of Department), Dr. RD Chapman (General Manager Health Support services), Mr. MS Shuping (General Manager, Clinical Health Services), Ms NJ Jolingana (Senior Manager TB/HIV/AIDS and Communicable Diseases), and Mrs. A Peters (former Free State Provincial TB Coordinator). District Health managers in the five districts of the Free State, clinic managers of the 40 trial clinics, as well as clinic managers of the pilot clinics of the study are all highly appreciated. Special thanks is extended to the district TB coordinators who served as PALSA trainers during the project implementation, namely, Sr. A Peters, Sr. L Smith, Sr. S Korkie, Sr. E Bolofo, Sr. F McKay, Sr. T Mothibeli, Sr. M Thirtle, and Sr. A Exley. I would like to extend a special thanks to the Director and staff of the Centre for Health Systems Research and Development (CHSR&D) of the University of the Free State, namely, Professor Dingie van Rensburg, Mr. C Heunis, Ms. E Janse van Rensburg-Bonthuyzen, Mr. Z. Matebesi and Ms. 0 Nel. The contribution of the Centre in recruiting and managing the fieldworkers is beyond explanation. All the 23 fieldworkers are also worth mentioning, especially the three supervisors, Mrs. M van Rensburg, Mr. N Khoapa, and Mrs. G Gaga, as well as the six team leaders, namely, Ms. J Porotloane, Ms. R Bouwer, Mr. T Mazibuko, Ms. A Masia, Ms. I Duma and Ms. I Masoge (who taak over from Mr. J Nocada) and the rest of the fieldworkers. I wish to extend my sincere appreciation to Government of the Kingdom of Lesotho for granting me an opportunity to further my studies as well as providing me with financial support through the Lesotho Highland Water Authority (LHDA). Finally, I would like to thank the International Development Research Centre (Canada) for funding implementation of the entire project implementation, xi particularly Dr. Christina Zarowsky (the team leader of the Governance, Equity and Health) for believing that South Africa could implement such a giant study. This thesis is dedicated to my family: my wife Nthabiseng and daughter Khauhelo. xii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter 1: Introd ucti on 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Respiratory conditions 1 1.2.1 Global picture 1 1.2.1.1 Morbidity, mortality and trends 1 1.2.1.2 Futu re projections 2 1.2.2 South African picture 4 1.2.2.1 Morbidity, mortality and trends 4 1.2.3 Free State picture 6 1.2.3.1 Morbidity, mortality and trends 6 1.3 The effectiveness of treatment for major 8 respiratory conditions at primary care level 1.3.1 Pneumonia 9 1.3.2 Upper respiratory tract infection 9 1.3.3 Asthma 10 1.3.4 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 14 (COP D) 1.3.5 Tuberculosis 16 1.4 Key primary health care policies and 19 strategies relevant to diagnosis and treatment of lung diseases 1.4.1 International 19 1.4.2 South Africa 21 1.4.3 Free State 25 1.5 Practical approach to lung health (PAL) and 26 PALSA 1.6 Evaluating the effectiveness of educational 27 methods aimed at changing clinical practice 1.7 Cluster randomized trials 29 1.8 Concluding remarks 31 1.9 Aim of the study 32 1.10 Objectives of the study 32 1.10.1 Primary outcomes 32 1.10.2 Secondary outcomes 33 Chapter 2: Methods 2.1 Introduction 35 2.2 PALSA intervention 35 2.2.1 Description 35 2.2.2 Schedule 36 xiii Table of content (continued) 2.2.2.1 Training of TB coordinators as PALSA 36 trainers 2.2.2.2 Training of clinic nursing staff 37 2.2.2.3 Official communication with district 38 management teams 2.2.2.4 Sensitization of medical doctors 38 2.2.2.5 Provincial drug circular on PALSA drugs 39 2.3 Study design 39 2.4 Study population 41 2.4.1 Clinics 41 2.4.2 Patients 42 2.5 Sample size assumption and estimates 44 2.6 Randomization 44 2.7 Enrolment of participants 47 2.7.1 Assessment of eligibility and enrolment 47 2.7.2 Informed consent 48 2.8 Data collection tools 48 2.8.1 First post-intervention survey and follow-up 48 interview questionnaires 2.8.2 Visual aids 50 2.8.2.1 Eoroqol-5D questionnaire including scale 50 2.8.2.2 Photographs 51 2.8.3 Notification of deceased patients form 51 2.8.4 Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) 51 2.9 Pilot of training and data collection 52 processes 2.10 Interviewers 54 2.10.1 Recruitment of interviewers for the first 54 post-intervention survey and follow-up interviews 2.10.2 Training of interviewers 54 2.10.3 Blinding of interviewers 56 2.11 Data collection process 57 2.12 Quality control 58 2.12.1 Quality control of the data collection 58 process 2.12.2 Periodic supervisory visits by the PALSA 59 researchers 2.12.3 Single database 59 2.13 Ethics and consent 59 2.13.1 Provincial health department 60 2.13.2 University of the Free State Ethics 60 committee xiv Table of content (continued) 2.13.3 Patient consent form 60 2.13.4 Confidentiality 60 2.14 Data checking 61 2.14.1 Data uploaded by PDA on daily basis 61 2.14.2 Data collected by paper questionnaires 61 2.15 Data analysis 62 2.16 Responsibilities of the candidate 66 Chapter 3: Results 3.1 Introduction 68 3.2 Results of the study 68 3.2.1 Characteristics of the clinics 68 3.2.2 PALSA training sessions at intervention 69 clinics 3.2.3 Characteristics of patients- general 70 3.2.4 Characteristics of patients by subgroups 72 3.2.5 Reliability of tracer questions 80 3.2.6 Primary and secondary outcomes 81 3.2.7 Number needed to treat calculations 86 Chapter 4: Discussion and conclusion 4.1 Intrad uction 87 4.2 Overview of the results 87 4.3 Comparison of the study's results with 90 results of previous trials 4.3.1 Antibiotic prescribing 90 4.3.2 Asthma treatment and management 92 4.3.2.1 General practitioners' knowledge about 92 diagnosis and treatment of asthma 4.3.2.2 Asthma specialist nurses 93 4.3.2.3 Asthma patient education 94 4.3.3 Cotrimoxazole prophylaxis 97 4.4 Strengths and limitations 98 4.4.1 Strengths of the study 98 4.4.2 Limitations of the study 101 4.5 Implications for policy 104 4.6 Priorities for future research 106 4.7 Conclusion 107 References 108 Annexes A1 xv LIST OF TABLES Page Chapter 1: Introduction Table 1.1: Global burden and mortality rates due 2 to respiratory conditions Table 1.2: Future projections of global respiratory 3 and other diseases in developing cou ntries Table 1.3: Top 20 single causes of deaths and 5 years to life lost (YLLs), South Africa, 2000 Table 1.4: Top 10 causes of death for Free State 6 Province in 2000 Table 1.5: Deaths due to infection and parasitic 7 diseases in Free State Province in 2000 Table 1.6: Deaths due to respiratory disorders in 8 Free State Province in 2000 Table 1.7: Summary of treatment of PALSA lung 19 diseases at primary care level Chapter 2: Methods Table 2.1: Summary of interviews conducted 53 during piloting of PALSA Table 2.2 Numerators and denominators for 63 outcomes Chapter 3: Results Table 3.1: Characteristics of clinics 68 Table 3.2: PALSA training sessions at 69 intervention clinics Table 3.3: Number of patients included in the 70 study Table 3.4: Patients' characteristics at first post- 71 intervention survey Table 3.5: Patients' symptoms at first post- 72 intervention survey Table 3.6: Characteristics at first post- 73 intervention survey of patients with cough> 2 weeks and not known to have tuberculosis xvi List of tables (continued) Table 3.7: Symptoms at first post-intervention 74 survey of patients with cough> 2 weeks and not known to have tuberculosis Table 3.8: Characteristics at first post- 75 intervention survey of patients known to have tuberculosis Table 3.9: Symptoms at first post-intervention 76 survey of patients known to have tuberculosis Table 3.10: Characteristics at first post- 77 intervention survey of patients with at least one of the 4 severity markers Table 3.11: Symptoms at first post-intervention 78 survey training manual of patients with at least one of the 4 severity markers Table 3.12: Characteristics at first post- 79 intervention survey of current smokers Table 3.13: Symptoms at first post-intervention 80 survey of current smokers Table 3.14: Agreement between repeated questions 81 at first post-intervention survey Table 3.15 Primary outcomes 82 Table 3.16(a) Secondary outcomes 83 Table 3.16(b) Secondary outcomes 84 Table 3.17 Number needed to treat (NNT) 86 xvii LIST OF FIGURES Page Chapter 2: Methods Figure 2.1: Study design 40 Figure 2.2: PALSA ReI clinic selection 42 Figure 2.3: Free State Provincial map showing trial clinics 46 xviii LIST OF ANNEXES Page Annex 1: PALSA Guidelines A1 Annex 2: PALSA Training Record A27 Annex 3: Standard letter to district/clinic A29 managers Annex 4: Doctor's letter A32 Annex 5: Drug circular A34 Annex 6: The selection process A37 Annex 7: Patient screening questionnaire- English A40 version Annex 8: Patient information and written consent A43 form- English version Annex 9: Reminder form A46 Annex 10: First post-i ntervention su rvey interview A48 questionnaire- English version Annex 11: Follow-up interview questionnaire- A82 English version Annex 12: Photographs A116 Annex 13: Notification of deceased patients at A127 follow-up form- English version Annex 14: A list of responsibilities of the field A129 workers Annex 15-1: Part 1- First post-intervention survey A132 training manual Annex 15-11: Part 2- First post-intervention survey A190 training manual training manual Annex 16: Follow-up training manual A212 Annex 17: May 2003 re-interview questionnaire A261 Annex 18: PALSA project flow chart A264 xix List of acronyms and abbreviations AIDS- Acquired immunodeficiency syndromes ALHI- Adult lung health initiative ARV- Antiretroviral drugs CAP- Community acquired pneumonia COPD- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DALY- Disability adjusted life years OOH- Department of Health OOTS- Directly observed therapy- short course FS- Free State province GOLD- Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease HIV- Human immunodeficiency virus IMCI- Integrated management of childhood diseases IDRC- International development and research centre- Canada IUATLD- International Union against Tuberculosis and lung disease LRTI- Lower respiratory tract infection MRC- Medical Research Council PAL- Practical approach to lung health PALSA- Practical approach to lung health in South Africa PHC- Primary Health Care RCT- Randomised controlled trial RR- Respiratory rate SA- South Africa SADHS- South African Demographic Health Survey STG/EDL- Standard treatment guidelines/Essential drug list T8- Tuberculosis UCT- University of Cape Town UFS- University of the Free State UK- United Kingdom UNICEF- United nation children fund xx URTI- Upper respiratory tract infection UWC- University of the Western Cape VCCT/HIV- Voluntary counselling and consent to test for HIV WHO- World Health Organisation xxi CHAPTER 1- INTRODUCTION 1.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter will give an overview of the burden and primary care of respiratory conditions in general. A global picture followed by a South African one will follow. A more focused picture of the Free State, the South African province where the Practical Approach to Lung Health in South Africa (PALSA) project was implemented, will then be given. The overview will be followed by an indication of how the PALSA initiative was developed in South Africa following the initiative of the World Health Organisation (WHO). 1.2 RESPIRATORY CONDITIONS 1.2.1 Global picture 1.2.1.1 Morbidity, mortality and trends Globally, respiratory conditions impose a severe burden on society (Ait-Khaled et al 2001). According to the World Health Report 2000, the top five respiratory diseases account for 17.4% of all deaths and 13.3% of all Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) in the world (WHO 2000). Lower respiratory infections, including pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), tuberculosis and lung cancer are each among the leading 10 causes of death worldwide (WHO 2002). Asthma affects about 300 million people worldwide and is the most prevalent chronic disease in childhood (Beasley et al 2003). Table 1.1 indicates that each year, globally, tuberculosis kills approximately 2 million people, some 3.8 million people die of respiratory infections and 2.7 million 1 die of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (WHO 2003 (a». Lower respiratory disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and tuberculosis together are responsible for 11% of all disability adjusted life years in the world (WHO 2003 (a». It is estimated that around 300 million people in the world currently have asthma, resulting in 180 000 deaths per annum (Beasley et a/2003). Table 1.1: Global burden and mortality rates due to respiratory conditions (Adapted from World Health Report 2003(a)) Type of Disease Burden of disease ('1000) in Deaths from Disease (DALYs) ('1000) Respiratory infections 90252 3847 HIV/AIDS 86072 2 821 Tuberculosis 35361 1605 COPD 27708 2746 Asthma 15325 239 1.2.1.2 Future projections As illustrated in Table 1.2 future projections of the global burden of disease predict that in developing countries respiratory diseases will occupy three of the top ten places by the year 2020 (Murrayand Lopez 1996). These projections suggest that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease will be ranked fifth, lower respiratory tract infections sixth, tuberculosis seventh and HIV tenth as causes of the global burden of disease. In developing countries, particularly sub-Saharan Africa, additional problems such as the rise of HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, tobacco use and indoor air pollution have significant social and economic implications. Add to this the contribution made by acute respiratory infections, and opportunistic infections in retroviral positive individuals, and it becomes evident that developing countries face a growing problem (Murrayand Lopez 1996). The deterioration in health service delivery, the spread of HIV/AIDS and the emergence of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis are contributing to the worsening 2 impact of the disease in developing countries (Ait-Khaled et al 2001, WHO 2003 (a)). It is estimated that between 2002 and 2020, approximately 100 million people will be newly infected, over 150 million people will get sick, and 31 million will die of tuberculosis if control is not further strengthened (Murrayand Lopez 1996). Table 1.2: Future projections of global respiratory and other diseases in developing countries (Adapted from Murrayand Lopez 1996) Disease/Injury 1990 1990 2020 2020 Rank % total DAL Ys Rank % total DALYs Lower respiratory infection 1 8.2 6 3.1 Tuberculosis 7 2.8 7 3.1 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 12 2.1 5 4.1 Trachea, bronchus, and lung cancers 28 0.6 15 1.8 Diarrhoeal diseases 2 7.2 9 2.7 Conditions arising during perinatal period 3 6.7 11 2.5 Unipolar major depression 4 3.7 2 5.7 Ischemic heart disease 5 3.4 1 5.9 Cerebrovascular disease 6 2.8 4 4.4 Measles 8 2.6 25 1.1 Road traffic accidents 9 2.5 3 5.1 Congenital anomalies 10 2.4 13 2.2 Malaria 11 2.3 24 1.1 Falls 13 1.9 19 1.5 Iron-deficiency anaemia 14 1.8 39 0.5 Protein-energy-malnutrition 15 1.5 37 0.6 War 16 1.5 8 3.0 Self-inflicted injuries 17 1.4 14 1.9 Violence 19 1.3 12 2.3 HIV 28 0.8 10 2.6 3 1.2.2 South African picture 1.2.2.1 Morbidity. mortality and trends According to the WHO Regional Mortality stratum, South Africa falls within the AFR-E, which is the African region with high child and adult mortality (WHO 2002). Approximately 80% of tuberculosis cases in the world are found in 23 countries; the highest incidence rates are found in sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia. The tuberculosis situation has worsened over the past two decades in Africa notably South Africa, as a result of the HIV/AIDS epidemic (WHO 2002, Bateman 2002, Raviglione et a/1997). In South Africa, an estimated 28% of all patients who present to Primary Health Care facilities have respiratory symptoms (Bateman 2002, Fairall et a/2001). Table 1.3 indicates that in 2000, the top single cause of mortality burden in South Africa was HIV/AIDS followed by homicide, tuberculosis, road traffic accidents and diarrhoea (Reddy et al 2004). HIV/AIDS accounted for 38% of total year life lost (YLLs) while tuberculosis, lower respiratory tract infection, COPD and asthma were among the top 20 single causes of deaths in South Africa (Reddy et a/2004). South Africa is experiencing a quadruple burden of disease comprising the pre- transitional diseases, the emerging chronic diseases, injuries, and HIV/AIDS. Unless interventions that reduce morbidity and delay mortality due to HIV/AIDS become widely available, the burden can be expected to grow very rapidly in the next few years (Bradshaw et al 2003, Reddy et a/2004). The 'White Paper for the Transformation of the Health System in South Africa" states that among priority programmes in South Africa, HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis rank as high priorities (Department of Health 1998(a». The 1998 South African Demographic Health Survey found that the smoking rate among adults in South Africa was 42% for male and 11% among female of 15 years and above. This high 4 rate aggravates high incidences of respiratory infections country-wide (Department of Health 1998(a)). Table 1.3: Top 20 single causes of deaths and Years of Life Lost (YLLs), South Africa, 2000 (Adapted from Reddy et a12004) Single causes Number of Rank Single causes YLLs Rank deaths HIV/AIDS 165859 1 HIV/AIDS 4665410 1 Tuberculosis 29553 5 Tuberculosis 595277 3 Lower respiratory infection 22097 6 Lower respiratory 449010 6 infection COPD 12473 11 COPD 113499 16 Trachea/bronchi/lung 7173 14 Asthma 94069 18 cancer Asthma 6987 15 Bacterial meningitis 90964 20 Ischemic heart disease 32919 2 Homicide/violence 902592 2 Homicide/violence 32485 3 Road traffic accidents 163544 4 Stroke 32114 4 Diarrhoeal diseases 489979 5 Road traffic accidents 18446 7 Low birth weight 393763 7 Diarrhoeal diseases 15910 8 Stroke 318083 8 Low birth weight 11876 12 Ischemic heart disease 145421 9 Nephritis/nephrosis 7225 13 Protein-energy 171433 10 malnutrition Suicide 6370 16 Hypertensive heart 127066 13 disease Septicaemia 6047 17 Fires 123400 14 Oesophageal 5803 18 Septicaemia 115247 15 Cirrhosis of liver 5672 19 Neonatal infections 93973 17 Protein-energy 5511 20 Nephritis/nephrosis 96819 19 malnutrition 5 1.2.3 Free State picture 1.2.3.1 Morbidity, mortality and trends Table 1.4 illustrates the Free State province's top ten causes of death in 2000 based on death certificates. Infectious and parasitic diseases were the highest while respiratory disorders ranked the third. In the case of deaths due to infectious and parasitic diseases, HIV/AIDS related infections and tuberculosis ranked the first and second respectively, as illustrated by Table 1.5. They accounted for about 40% and 35% respectively from a total of 2060 deaths in the province (Department of Health 2002(a». According to the 2002 report on the prevalence of HIV/AIDS in South Africa, the Free State province currently stands in the third position at 28.8% of antenatal clinic attendees (Shishane and Simbayi 2002). In terms of the highest level of infection amongst all groups, that is, not only for antenatal clinic attendees, the Free State was ranked the highest in the country with 14.9% (Shishane and Simbayi 2002). Table 1.4: Top 10 causes of death for Free State province in 2000 (Adapted from Department of Health 2002(a» Disease Total number of deaths Percentage (%) (N=8500) Infectious & parasitic 2060 24.2 Symptom & signs unclassified 1736 20.4 Respiratory 1516 17.8 Circulatory 1465 17.2 Neoplasm 462 5.4 External 406 4.8 Endocrine & nutrition 283 3.3 Pregnancy & childbearing 283 3.3 Genito-urinary system 159 1.9 Digestive system 130 1.5 6 Table 1.5: Deaths due to infectious and parasitic diseases in Free State Province in 2000 (adapted from Department of Health 2002(a)) Condition Total number of deaths Percentage (%) (N=2058) HIV 823 40.0 Tuberculosis 716 34.8 Diarrhoea & Gastroenteritis 317 15.4 Septicaemia unspecified 107 5.2 Other viral enteritis 48 2.3 Acute amboebic dysentery 19 0.9 Hepatitis 10 0.5 Amboebic brain abscess 8 0.4 Acute poliomyelitis 7 0.3 Typhoid fever 1 0.05 Neurosyphyllis unspecified 1 0.05 Cryptococcus unspecified 1 0.05 During 2000, as indicated in Table 1.6, the total number of deaths due to respiratory conditions was 1516, with pneumonia accounting for 76%, respiratory failure 9%, COPD 4% and asthma 3% and other lung disorders accounting for the remainder (Department of Health 2002(a)). 7 Table 1.6: Deaths due to respiratory disorders in Free State in 2000 (Adapted from Department of Health 2002(a)) Condition Total number of deaths Percentage (%) (N=1516) Pneumonia 1145 75.5 Respiratory failure 137 9.0 COPD unspecified 59 3.9 Asthma 42 2.8 Other disorders of the lungs 39 2.6 Pulmonary oedema 27 1.8 Diseases of upper respiratory tract 24 1.6 infections unspecified Unspecified chronic bronchitis 20 1.3 Pleural effusion 8 0.5 Bronchitis unspecified 7 0.5 Other intestinal pulmonary diseases with 4 0.3 fibrosis Lower respiratory tract infections 2 0.13 Common cold 1 0.07 Acute laryngitis 1 0.07 1.3 THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TREATMENT FOR MAJOR RESPIRATORY CONDITIONS AT PRIMARY CARE LEVEL There have been several systematic reviews and trials on available treatments at primary health care level aimed at addressing the abovementioned diseases. Below is a summary of the systematic reviews of 5 primary health care priority respiratory diseases, namely pneumonia, upper respiratory infections, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and tuberculosis. 8 1.3.1 Pneumonia In evaluating the effects of different oral antibiotics to treat patients with community acquired pneumonia (CAP) in outpatient settings, one systematic review looked at 9 randomized controlled trials involving 1164 people (Pomilla and Brown 1994). Antibiotics evaluated were amoxicillin, with and without clavulanate, macrolides, cephalosporins, and quinolones. The review reported clinical cure or improvement in over 90% of the people regardless of which antibiotics was taken (Pomilla and Brown 1994). This review indicates that the use of antibiotics for treatment of community acquired pneumonia can be effective at primary care level. Regarding evaluation of the effectiveness of clinical guidelines on treatment of community acquired pneumonia, one systematic review looked at 3 randomised controlled trials and 7 cohort studies comparing guidelines that incorporated early switch from intravenous to oral antibiotics and early discharge strategies (or both) versus usual care (Rhew et al 2001). The study found no significant difference in clinical outcomes and mean length of hospital stay (Rhew et al 2001). Early discharge and early switch to oral medication are thus effective for the treatment of community acquired pneumonia at primary care level. 1.3.2 Upper respiratory tract infection In evaluating the effectiveness of use of antibiotics for treating upper respiratory tract infection one systematic review looked at 26 randomised controlled trials involving 2669 people with sore throat. The review established that compared with placebo, antibiotics slightly but significantly reduced the proportion of people with symptoms of sore throat at 6-8 days and shortened symptom duration by a mean of about 24 hours at day 3 (Del mar et a/2004). The review also established that antibiotics significantly reduced the proportion of people who developed rheumatic fever at 2 months compared with placebo (Del mar et al 2004). Smucny and colleagues reviewed nine randomised trials involving over 750 patients comparing 9 antibiotic therapy with placebo in acute bronchitis or acute productive cough. The researchers established that patients receiving antibiotics had better outcomes than those receiving placebo (Smucny ef a/2004). In South Africa, Meyers and colleagues conducted a study to assess the effect of a prescribing training intervention for primary health care nurses in the Lowveld Region of the Northern Province of South Africa (Meyers ef al 2001). The intervention in this case was a generic training-of-trainers course of a 4-day effective prescribing course which was presented to 24 provincial trainers who in turn conducted effective prescribing workshops for 20 primary health care nurses per workshop. In 1997, 457 prescribers were trained by this method in project sites. The study investigated the impact of the training on prescribing practices for two target conditions, in a control and a study group of 11 clinics each, 1 month after and 3 months after the intervention. Changed behaviour was not only seen in prescribing for upper respiratory tract infections, used as an example condition, but also for diarrhoea and/or vomiting, a common condition in the region, which was not included in the training programme. These results showed that prescribers not only retained the knowledge gained, but were also able to apply their new skills to other conditions. The change in the study group was maintained for 3 months after training, while there were no significant improvements in prescribing in the control group (Meyers ef a/2001). The above two reviews and one study suggest that use of antibiotics for treatment of upper respiratory infections and training of nurses on the use of guidelines for prescribing are effective for treatment of upper respiratory tract infections. 1.3.3Asthma To evaluate the effectiveness of antibiotics prescribed to patients in the treatment of acute asthma, a systematic review looked at two randomised controlled trials involving 97 patients (Graham ef a/2004). The review revealed that currently the 10 role of antibiotics in the treatment of acute asthma is difficult to assess, therefore further research is still required (Graham et a/2004). To evaluate the effectiveness of regular versus as needed inhaled short acting beta-2 agonist in adults with mild or moderate asthma, one systematic review looked at 22 cross-over randomised controlled trials, 8 parallel group randomised controlled trial and one subsequent randomised controlled trial (Waiters and Waiters 2001). The review established no significant difference between regular and as needed inhaled short acting beta-2 agonists for clinically important outcomes (Waiters and Waiters 2001). In evaluating the effectiveness of inhaled long acting beta-2 agonists in people with stable chronic asthma, 85 randomised studies comparing a long acting inhaled beta-agonist with placebo were reviewed (Waiters et a/2004). The review established significant advantages of long acting beta-2 agonist treatment, compared to placebo, for a variety of measurements of airway calibre (including morning and evening peak flows), fewer symptoms, less use of rescue medication and higher quality of life (Waiters et a/2004). In evaluating the effectiveness of low dose inhaled corticosteroids versus placebo in people with mild, persistent asthma, one systematic review looked at 52 randomised controlled trials involving 3459 people (Adams et al 2004(a». The review established that a low dose inhaled corticosteroid, beclomethasone dipropionate (BOP) versus placebo significantly improved lung function and symptoms, and reduced the need for short acting bronchodilators (Adams et a/ 2004(a». Another systematic review looked at 5 randomised controlled trials involving 141 adults with mild persistent asthma, comparing inhaled corticosteroids versus placebo and versus beta-2 agonist respectively. The review found that regular inhaled corticosteroids versus regular beta-2 agonist or placebo significantly improved lung function (Nathan et a/2001). 11 Mash and colleagues also conducted a systematic review to establish the effectiveness of inhaled versus oral steroids for adults with chronic asthma (Mash et a/2004). The study looked at 10 randomised controlled trials involving 269 adult patients and revealed that a daily dose of an oral steroid (prednisone 7.5-10 mg/day) appears to be equivalent to moderate-high dose inhaled corticosteroids (Mash et a/2004). Nolan and White conducted a study to determine the relationship between asthma morbidity and the attendance of and prescribing for symptomatic asthma patients in primary care in England (Nolan and White 2002). Results of the study showed that asthma management of the majority of the patients was active with high levels of steroid prescribing. There appeared to be room to increase steroid prescribing and to improve the structure of care (Nolan and White 2002). There is thus agreement among the above reviews that use of inhalers steroids for treatment of asthma has been shown to be effective. There is however a growing concern that beta agonists ("relievers") tend to be overused compared to inhaled steroids ("preventers") (Diette et a/1999). Many third world countries, notably South Africa have endeavoured to measure the impact of asthma on individuals with asthma and have also attempted to define the quality of care for this common chronic illness. Green and colleagues conducted a study with a primary objective of assisting the National Asthma Program in South Africa with the formulation and delivery of its outreach program to rural asthmatic patients (Green et al 2001). The researchers conducted interviews with thirty five adult asthmatic patients and twenty seven parents of paediatric asthmatic patients at seven rural health clinics across South Africa. Each interview included extensive demographic details, questions on asthma definition, symptoms and symptom triggers, family history, age at diagnosis, frequency of symptoms, and treatment. Of the adult patients, 40% reported wheezing at least once a week (despite diagnosis and treatment) and 19% of 12 children reported similar symptom exacerbations. Fifty-one percent of adults and 56% of children were awakened at least once a week by cough or wheeze. Fifty- one percent of adults and 33% of children had been hospitalized at least once for asthma. Although respondents claimed regular training in use of inhaler device, only 43% of adults completed each step correctly. The researchers came to the conclusion that there is a great deal of fear and ignorance surrounding asthma and, therefore, there is need for a greater level of patient education in the rural areas of South Africa with special attention being paid to nurses, because they play a greater role than doctors in management and education of asthma (Green et a/2001). Griffiths and colleagues conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial study to determine whether asthma specialist nurses, using a liaison model of care, could reduce unscheduled care in a deprived multiethnic area in England (Griffiths et a/ 2004). The study included 44 general practices in two boroughs in east London, and it involved 324 people aged 4-60 years admitted to or attending hospital or the general practitioner out of hour service with acute asthma (Griffiths et a/2004). At intervention clinics patients were reviewed by a nurse in liaison with general practitioners, there was also promotion of guidelines for high risk asthma, and ongoing clinical support. Control practices on the other hand received a visit promoting standard asthma guidelines and control patients were checked for inhaler technique only. The results of the study revealed that the intervention delayed time to first attendance with acute asthma (hazard ratio 0.73, 95% Cl 0.54 to 1.00; median 194 days for intervention and 126 days for control) and reduced the percentage of participants attending with acute asthma (58% (101/174) versus 68% (99/145); odds ratio 0.62, 95% Cl 0.38 to 1.01). The researchers concluded that asthma specialist nurses using a liaison model of care reduced unscheduled care for asthma (Griffiths et a/2004). The above two cited studies indicate that nurses play a critical role in managing acute asthma at primary care level and countries especially developing countries 13 need to invest in them through training. One of the studies was conducted in a developed country while the other one was conducted in South Africa. 1.3.4 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPO) In the evaluation of effects of inhaled anticholinergics for treating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a review of 3 large randomised controlled trials involving 1461 people comparing ipratropium, salmeterol and formoterol versus placebo was conducted. The review established that, compared to placebo, inhaled anticholinergics significantly improved forced expiratory volume in 1 second, exercise capacity and symptoms (Kersijens and Postama 2002). In evaluating inhaled beta-2 agonists for treating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, one systematic review looked at 9 cross-over randomised controlled trials involving 264 people with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease comparing short acting beta-2 agonists versus placebo for 1 week. The review established that compared to placebo, inhaled beta-2 agonists slightly but significantly improved forced expiratory volume in 1 second and also improved respiratory symptoms (Sestini et a/2002). In evaluating inhaled anticholinergics plus beta-2 agonists for treating chronic obstructive respiratory disease, one review looked at 6 randomised controlled trails involving 2772 people, comparing the addition of ipratropium versus no additional ipratropium in people using standard dose of short acting inhaled beta- 2. The review established significant improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second of about 25% with the combination compared with either drug alone (Friedman et a/1999). There is thus general agreement among the above three reviews that use of inhalers for treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease has been shown to be effective. 14 Smith and colleagues reviewed evaluations of the effectiveness of outreach respiratory health care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by looking at 4 randomised controlled trials involving 624 people (Smith et a/ 2004). The review established that patients with moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease may have mortality and health related quality of life gains from the programme whereas patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease do not. Reduction in hospital admissions were not obtained in severe patients (Smith et a/2004). Despite the existence of effective cessation methods, the vast majority of smokers attempt to quit on their own (Hammond et a/2004). To date, there is little evidence to explain the low adoption rates for effective forms of cessation assistance, including pharmaceutical aids. Hammond and colleagues conducted a study that sought to assess smokers' awareness and perceived effectiveness of cessation methods and to examine the relationship of this knowledge to cessation behaviour among 616 adult daily smokers over 3 months in South-Western Ontario, Canada (Hammond et a/ 2004).The researchers established that participants who perceived cessation methods to be effective at baseline, were more likely to intend to quit (odds rati01.80; 95% Cl 1.12 to 2.90), make a quit attempt at follow-up (odds ratio 1.80; 95% Cl 1.03 to 3.16) and to adopt cessation assistance when doing so (odds ratio 3.62; 95% Cl 1.04 to 12.58). The researchers came to the conclusion that many smokers may be unaware of effective cessation methods and most underestimate their benefit and this lack of knowledge may represent a significant barrier to treatment adoptions (Hammond et a/2004). The review and study thus indicate that outreach respiratory care and smoking cessation interventions can be effective for treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. 15 1.3.5 Tuberculosis It is assumed that preventive therapy for tuberculosis will only be considered by programs with high rates of case detection and cure of smear positive tuberculosis (Borgdorff ef a/2002). it is further estimated that in the absence of treatment, each smear positive case of tuberculosis would be infectious for 2 years and thus generate 2B infection (where B is the number of infections generated per case per year) (Borgdorff ef al 2002). Each new self reporting case detected after, on average, 4 months would have infected 0.33B contacts. Without treatment, each infectious case would generate on average one other first generation infectious case, and treatment of each case would prevent 0.73 new infectious cases (Borgdorff ef a/2002). In assessing the effects of short course chemotherapy «6 months) versus longer term (>6 months) on cure rates in people with active tuberculosis, one review looked at 7 randomised controlled trials involving 4100 patients (Gelband 2004). The review established that longer periods of treatment result in higher success rates in patients with active tuberculosis even though the difference is small (Gelband 2004). Another systematic review on tuberculosis was conducted by Mwanduaba and colleagues to compare the effectiveness of rifampicin-containing short course chemotherapy regimens, given 2 or 3 times a week with similar regimens given daily in adult patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (Mwanduaba and Squire 2004). One randomised controlled trial involving 399 patients compared the treatment of 3 times a week with daily treatment for a period of 6 months. The review revealed no difference in the cure rate between the two arms with an exception that five patients relapsed in the intermittent therapy compared to one in the daily therapy (Mwanduaba and Squire 2004). 16 Volmink and colleagues reviewed trials that compared policies of directly observed therapy with self-treatment at home in people requiring treatment for clinically active tuberculosis (Volmink and Gamer 2004). Six randomised and quasi- randomised studies involving 1910 patients were reviewed. The review established that the effect of directly observation therapy on cure or treatment completion rates was similar to that of self-administered treatment (Volmink and Garner 2004). There is thus general agreement among the above three reviews that treatment of tuberculosis using internationally accepted regimens can be effective. Prevention and early treatment of infections is the mainstay of the medical management of the majority of people with HIV infection, especially those who live in low income countries without access to antiretroviral drugs. Cotrimoxazole is cheap and is effective against a wide range of organisms (Grimwade and Swingier 2004). Tuberculosis is one of the life threatening opportunistic infections among HIV positive patients. To evaluate the effectiveness of routinely administered cotrimoxasole on death and illness episodes in HIV infected adults, a systematic review looked at four randomised and quasi-randomised trials involving 1476 people (Grimwade and Swingier 2004). The review established that cotrimoxasole prophylaxis had a beneficial effect in preventing death and illness episodes in adults with early and with advanced HIV disease (Grimwade and Swingier 2004). Zachariah and colleagues conducted a cross-sectional study to verify compliance with cotrimoxazole prophylaxis in human immunodeficiency virus infected tuberculosis patients during the continuation phase of anti-tuberculosis treatment, and to assess the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive values of verbal verification and pill counts as methods of checking compliance in Malawi (Zachariah et al 2001). Results of the study showed that in a rural district in Malawi, compliance with cotrimoxazole prophylaxis as an adjunct to anti- tuberculosis treatment in HIV infected tuberculosis patients was good, and can be 17 assessed simply and practically by verbal verification and pill counts (Zachariah et a/2001). Zachariah and colleagues conducted a subsequent cross-sectional study in the same setting as above, this time to determine 1) the proportion who continues with cotrimoxazole prophylaxis for the prevention of opportunistic infections, and 2) the reasons for continuing or stopping prophylaxis, in human immunodeficiency virus infected individuals with tuberculosis who complete anti-tuberculosis treatment (Zachariah et a/2002). The results of the study showed that in rural settings, the great majority of HIV infected individuals continued with cotrimoxazole after completing anti-tuberculosis treatment. There is general agreement amongst the above reviews and studies that cotrimoxazole prophylaxis in rural settings is an effective intervention in preventing death and illness episodes in adults with early and advanced HIV with or without tuberculosis co-infection. Table 1.7 below gives a summary of systematic reviews on treatment of the 5 priority lung diseases of PALSA. The table suggests that all 5 priority respiratory diseases can be effectively managed at primary health care level by drugs which can be issued at that level. Antiretroviral (ARV) treatment effectiveness was not reviewed as these drugs were not yet generally available at primary care level in South Africa at the time of the study. For management at primary health care level however, clinician competence in diagnosing and treating these diseases is needed. 18 Table 1.7: Summary of treatment of PALSA lung diseases at primary care level Condition Treatment Effective/Non-effective Community Acquired Pneumonia Antibiotics Effective Upper Respiratory tract infection Antibiotics Non-effective Asthma Antibiotics Unclear Inhaled beta-2 agonist Effective Inhaled long acting beta-2 Effective agonists Inhaled corticosteroids Effective Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Knowledge on smoking Effective cessation options Outreach respiratory care Effective Tuberculosis Short course Effective Long course More effective Intermittent therapy Non-effective DOTS Effective Self-treatment Effective Cotrimoxasole prophylaxis Effective 1.4 KEY PRIMARY HEALTH CARE POLICIES AND STRATEGIES RELEVANT TO THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF LUNG DISEASES 1.4.1 International The World Health Organisation (WHO), as the technical advisory body of the United Nations (UN) to countries on all health related issues, spearheads development of health-related policies, protocols, guidelines and strategies (WHO 2004(b». Individual countries then adapt these documents to suit their conditions and requirements. WHO is also responsible for monitoring and evaluating implementation of the documents as well as maintaining a database that indicates implementation and status of each member country (WHO 2004 (b». 19 In an attempt to fight against all these above mentioned life-threatening respiratory diseases. WHO in collaboration with other international agencies and governments, has for a long time been promoting implementation of several national programmes. Of major importance is the fight against tuberculosis which has for a long time been one of the top killer diseases in the world (Borgdorff et al 2002, Hopewell 2002). In 1993 and 1997, the 1st and 2nd editions of Treatment of Tuberculosis: Guidelines for National Programmes were published by WHO (WHO 2003 (b)). The guidelines were adapted by each country as National Tuberculosis Programmes were being implemented, especially in low income countries where tuberculosis is one of the leading causes of death in adults (Dye et al 2002, Enarson et a/1996). The 3rd edition of the guidelines compiled in 2003 is the latest version of the guidelines (WHO 2003(b)). Another important policy that was developed through WHO initiative was the Integrated Management of Childhood Illnesses (IMCI) strategy. This was a joint venture between WHO and UNICEF and it was initiated in 1995. IMCI offers a set of interventions that promote rapid recognition and effective treatment of major killer diseases of children under five from an integrated approach (WHO/UNICEF 2001). This approach emphasises syndromic management, in which limited diagnostic skills and resources can still lead to appropriate treatment for most patients. Another policy document that was developed through WHO initiative was the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (GOLD). This was a joint venture between WHO and the United States National Heart, Lung and Blood Initiative (NHLBI) and it was initiated in the early 1990s. Through WHO's initiative, guidelines were developed to classify chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients according to 4 stages of the disease severity using the spirometer measurements (pauwels et a/2001). 20 It was on the basis of the policies discussed above that the Adult Lung Health Initiative (ALHl) which later became the Practical Approach to Lung Health (PAL) (See 1.5) was adapted. 1.4.2 South Africa There are several primary care policies and strategies that the national Health Department has developed. Many of these are based on WHO policies. National policies are passed on to the nine provincial health authorities to also adapt and implement at provincial level (Department of Health 2000(b». Among these is the tuberculosis (TB) programme that is currently being implemented in all nine provinces, although with different degrees of intensity and success (Bamford et al 2004). Each province has a provincial TB coordinator who supervises district TB coordinators to ensure smooth implementation of the programme at district level. Referral and reporting systems follow the same route on a quarterly basis, that is, from district to province and then to national and vice versa. An annual report that highlights trends of morbidity and mortality due to tuberculosis is compiled at national level with contributions from the provinces (Bamford et al 2004). The report also makes a comparison between and amongst the nine provinces on an annual basis. South Africa is currently implementing the TB Strategic Plan for 2001-2005 which was adopted following the Amsterdam Conference on TB in 2000 (Bamford et a12004, WHO 2004(b». In 1996 the National Government of South Africa adopted the Integrated Management of Childhood Illnesses (IMCI) strategy that was developed by WHO and UNICEF in 1995. Full political and administrative support from the highest levels of government was given for commencement of implementation in all nine provinces by incorporating IMCI as part of the PHC package for the country (Department of Health 2002(b». Commencement and level of IMCI implementation in three out of the nine provinces namely, Gauteng, the Western Cape and Free State was evaluated in 2002 and a draft report compiled thereof. In 21 summary, these three provinces are implementing IMCI at different levels (Department of Health 2002(b)). The implementation of AIDS policy in the first four years after 1994 has been characterized by a lack of progress and a breakdown of trust and co-operation, both within government and between government and NGOs (Schneider and Stein 2001). There were generally difficulties of implementing the comprehensive response to AIDS in a country undergoing restructuring at every level. This was characterized by "inadequate political will" as an explanation for lack of progress. Involvement by politicians has, in fact, been experienced as a double-edged sword in South Africa, with inappropriate, "quick-fix" actions creating conflict and hampering a more longer-term, effective response (Schneider and Stein 2001). The importance of groups like the Treatment Action Campaign (TAC) which function outside government in promoting effective policy actions, and the types of leadership required to mobilise a broad range of actors around a common vision can not be overemphasized (Schneider and Stein 2001). In 2000, the HIV/AIDS Strategic Plan for South Africa 2000-2005 was adopted by government. The strategic plan contains four priority areas namely: 1) prevention, 2) treatment, care and support, 3) research, monitoring and surveillance, 4) human rights (Department of Health 2000(a». There have been developments to different degrees by each of the nine provinces regarding implementation of the strategic plan. In 2003 government approved a proposed budget for implementation of roll- out of antiretroviral drugs (ARV) as part of the treatment, care and support priority area 2 of the strategic plan (DOH 2003(a), Mbewu and Simelela 2003). Each province has drawn up its own implementation plan of the roll-out, most of which started implementation in 2004 (Mbewu and Simelela 2003). This is a follow-up to several trials that were conducted at provincial level to establish the effectiveness of treating symptomatic HIV positive patients with WHO approved antiretroviral drugs (Doherty and Calvin 2004). In 2003 the National Department of Health 22 adopted a policy of providing antiretroviral treatment to people in advanced stages of HIV/AIDS (Department of Health 2003(b». Following the 1994 political changes in South Africa, the health care delivery system was changed on a number of fronts and several policy documents were developed as a result. On December 3, 1998, the Minister of Health of South Africa launched the First Edition of the Standard Treatment Guidelines (STG) and Essential Drug List (EDL) for adults and children at hospital, and the Second Edition of the STG/EDL for Primary Health Care (Zweygarth and Summers 2000). The STG/EDL lists and defines diseases that are of public health importance at either a hospital or primary health care clinic, non-drug and drug treatment of such diseases and essential drugs to be prescribed (by what cadre of health professional) at each level (Department of Health 1998(b), Zweygarth and Summers 2000). The hospital STG/EDL is currently being reviewed and updated through official channels throughout South Africa. In South Africa, as in most low-middle income countries, primary health care is provided at low or no cost to users through public sector health services or publicly subsidized agencies (Department of Health 1996, Segall 2003). Due to constraints on resources, as well as relatively unattractive incentives for doctors, such care is mainly provided by primary care nurses (Green et al 2001, Louwagie et al 2002). In South Africa most nurses undergo a four year college or university training to obtain a recognised professional nursing qualification. In response to the national government's policy of adoption of the primary health care package norms and standards, provincial health departments requested universities and nursing colleges in their provinces to provide training to professional nurses (Louwagie et al 2002). This is done through post-basic nursing courses aimed at equipping participants with necessary skills for effective delivery of quality, comprehensive health care at primary care level. KAComprehensive Primary Health Care Service Package for South Africa" was developed in 2000 by the National Department of Health. This booklet summarises all health services that are supposed to be 23 rendered at primary care level in terms of who should to what and how at primary care level (Department of Health 2000(b». Non-communicable diseases such as hypertension, asthma, diabetes and epilepsy are placing an increasing burden on clinical services in developing countries and innovative strategies are therefore needed to optimize existing services (Coleman et al 1998, Louwagie et al 2002). Coleman and colleagues conducted a study that aimed at describing the design and implementation of a nurse-led service based on clinical protocols in a resource-poor area of South Africa (Coleman et al 1998). Diagnostic and treatment protocols were designed and introduced at all primary care clinics in a district, using only essential drugs and appropriate technology. The protocols enabled the nurses to control the clinical condition of 68% of patients with hypertension, 82% of those with non- insulin-dependent diabetes, and 84% of those with asthma. The management of non-communicable diseases of 79% of patients who came from areas served by village or mobile clinics was transferred from the district hospital to such clinics. Patient-reported adherence to treatment increased from 79% to 87% (p= 0.03) over the 2 years that the service was operating. The use of simple protocols and treatment strategies that were responsive to the local situation enabled the majority of patients to receive convenient and appropriate management of their non-communicable diseases at their local primary care facility (Coleman et al 1998). Louwagie and colleagues conducted an audit aimed at comparing the clinical competencies of nurses who underwent a one year "Advanced Diploma in Health Assessment, Diagnosis and Treatment" course at the University of the Free State with those who did not. The primary objective was to assess the clinical management of one chronic and one acute disease (diabetes mellitus and acute respiratory tract infections in adults, respectively) for these two groups of nurses (Louwagie et a/2002). The researchers reviewed records of 286 consecutive visits for adults with diabetes and 293 consecutive visits for adults with an acute 24 respiratory tract infection (ARTI). Nurses completed questionnaires on nurse characteristics, while the researchers obtained the information about the clinics. Recording of important generic (for ARTIs) and disease-specific steps (for diabetes) in patient management were assessed. When comparing results of patients of "trained" and "non-trained" professionals, and adjusting for nurses', clinics' and patients' characteristics, there was generally little evidence of patients being thoroughly managed (Louwagie et a/ 2002). The researchers concluded that formal training was marginally associated with better care for ARTls (p = 0.06) but not for diabetes (p = 0.47). Other factors associated with more thorough care were years of experience in curative primary health care (p = 0.006) and additional nursing degrees for ARTls (p = 0.03) and the presence of enrolled or assistant nurses at the clinic for diabetes (p = 0.06) (Louwagie et a/2002). Evidence provided by the above two studies and others cited earlier in the chapter supports an argument that there was a need to design a simple nurse oriented syndromic approach that would attempt to manage respiratory care service delivery in South Africa, hence the adoption of PALSA 1.4.3 Free State The Free State, one of the nine provinces of South Africa, also follows and adapts policy guidelines, strategies and protocols from the National Health Department. Currently the province implements the following policies that are related to the PALSA project and are adapted locally: 1. Tuberculosis (TB) treatment and diagnosis guidelines 2. IMCI training manual 3. Asthma treatment guidelines 4. Hospital and primary care level Standard Treatment Guidelines and Essential Drug List (STG/EDL). 25 These policy documents are periodically reviewed and updated as and when required by the provincial authorities in consultation with the National Department of Health. Technical input from local and international experts is incorporated. 1.5 PRACTICAL APPROACH TO LUNG HEALTH (PAL) AND PALSA The Practical Approach to Lung health (PAL) is a WHO initiated syndromic approach to management of patients (above 5 years old) who attend primary health care service for respiratory symptoms (WHO 2003(c». The initiative targets multi-purpose health workers, nurses, doctors and managers in primary health care settings with successful TB Control Programmes in low and middle-income countries (WHO 2003(c». PAL, which was initially known as the Adult Lung Health Initiative (ALHl) was developed as a result of several studies that revealed that up to one-third of patients over the age of 5 years attending primary health care settings seek health care for respiratory symptoms (WHO 2003(c». The main objectives of PAL are to improve quality of respiratory case management for the individual patients as well as to improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of respiratory care within the health systems. Components of PAL comprise of standardisation of health care service delivery through development and implementation of clinical practice guidelines as well as coordination of all role players at all levels of health care, the TB Control Programmes and organisation and management of general health services. It is noteworthy that PAL is organised within the WHO TB Control Programme, specifically as part of the Global Directly Observed Therapy Expanded Plan. The WHO TB programme is particularly interested in PAL's role in expanded tuberculosis case detection. Requirement for introducing PAL into a country include, among several conditions, political commitment to adapt and implement the strategy, assessment of existing conditions to adapt the strategy, formulation of an agenda for adaptation and development and implementation of the strategy (WHO 2003(c)). 26 The idea of adapting ALHI (now PAL) in South Africa (PALSA) dates as far back as 1999 through the involvement of one of PAL's senior researcher (then an employee of MRC SA) at meetings of an international organisation called the Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trials in Health Care (PRACHTIC), an organisation with interest in pragmatic randomised controlled trials to influence health policies in countries throughout the world. Eventually the adaptation and implementation of the strategy was conducted on trial basis through a cluster randomised trial which started in 2003. This was a joint venture between the Free State Provincial Health Department and University of the Free State's Community Health Department, Centre for Health Systems Research and Development and Biostatistics Department as well as the University of Cape Town Lung Institute. The project has been financially supported by the Canadian International Development Research Centre, the WHO, the Government of South Africa (National and Provincial) and the Government of Lesotho. Results of the trial will be used for making informed decisions about implementation in the entire province and, later on, the whole country (IDRC 2004). 1.6 EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF EDUCATIONAL METHODS AIMED AT CHANGING CLINICAL PRACTICE There have been several systematic reviews to evaluate the effects of clinical practice guidelines on patient outcomes in primary health care. Grimshawand colleagues conducted a systematic review to establish the effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies (Grimshawet al 2004). A total of 235 randomised controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, and controlled before and after studies, reporting 309 comparisons were reviewed. Guideline dissemination and implementation strategies were the main interventions evaluated. Commonly evaluated single interventions were reminders (38 comparisons), dissemination of educational materials (18 comparisons) and audit and feedback (12 comparisons). There were 23 comparisons of multifaceted 27 interventions involving educational outreach. The majority of interventions observed modest to moderate improvements to care. The median absolute improvement in performance across interventions were 14.1% in 14 cluster randomised comparisons of reminders, 8.1% in four cluster randomised comparisons of dissemination of educational materials, 7.0% in five cluster randomised comparisons of audit and feedback comparisons and 6.0% in 13 cluster randomised comparisons of multifaceted interventions involving educational outreach. The review concluded that there is imperfect evidence to support decisions about which guideline dissemination and implementation strategies are likely to be efficient under different circumstances. Decision makers need to consider potential clinical areas for clinical effectiveness activities, the likely benefits and costs required to introduce guidelines and the likely benefits and costs as a result of any changes in provider behaviour (Grimshawet a/2004). Hulscher and colleagues reviewed available data on evaluation of interventions to improve delivery of preventive services in primary health care. They reviewed 55 randomised trials, controlled before and after studies involving 2000 professionals and 99000 people (Huischer et al 2004). The researchers established that in comparing interventions that used randomised groups, the effectiveness varied extensively. Five comparisons of group education versus no intervention showed absolute changes of preventive services varying between -4% and 31%, nine comparisons of physician reminder versus no intervention showed absolute changes of preventive services varying between 5% and 24% and fourteen comparisons of multifaceted intervention versus no intervention showed absolute changes of preventive services varying between -3% and 64%. Six comparisons of multifaceted interventions versus group education reported absolute changes varying between 28% and 31%. This review reveals that effective interventions to increase preventive activities in primary care do exist, but there is considerable variation in the level of change achieved, with effect sizes usually small or moderate. The review also indicates that tailoring interventions to address specific barriers to change is important and that multifaceted interventions may be more 28 effective than single interventions because more barriers to change can be addressed (Huischer et a/2004). Thomson Q'Brien and colleagues conducted a systematic review of studies to evaluate the effects of outreach visits on improving health professional practice or patient outcomes. The researchers reviewed 18 randomised controlled trials involving 1896 physicians (Thomson Q'Brien et a/2004). The targeted behaviours were mainly prescribing, and preventive services including counselling for smoking cessation (Thomson Q'Brien et al 2004). Positive effects on practice were observed in all studies, although at different magnitudes. The authors concluded that educational outreach visits, particularly when combined with social marketing, appear to be a promising approach to modify health professional behaviour, especially on prescribing (Thomson Q'Brien et a/2004). Trials that have been cited in the above reviews were mainly randomised controlled trials, controlled clinical trials as well as controlled before and after trials. Most of these trials compared intervention groups with controls or placebo. Findings of the above three reviews suggest that implementation of .clinical guidelines, preventive services and outreach visits are some of the most effective interventions that can be provided at primary care level. Because their effectiveness varies considerably in size, that is, from modest to moderate, there is a need to further explore their value. 1.7 CLUSTER RANDOM.SED TRIALS A cluster randomised trial is one where a group of patients rather than individuals are randomised to different groups that are managed in different ways (Campbell and Grimshaw 1998, Donner and Klar 2000). An example of this is when patients of general practitioners who have received special training are compared with patients of general practitioners who have not received the training (Bland and Kerry 1997). Reasons for adopting cluster randomization are diverse, but include 29 administrative convenience, a desire to reduce the effect of treatment contamination and the need to avoid ethical issues that might arise (Klar and Donner 2001, MRC 2002). The main consequence of adopting a cluster design is that the outcome for each patient can no longer be assumed to be independent of that for other patients (which is the case in an individually randomised trial) (Donner and Klar 2000). Patients within anyone cluster are more likely than patients in other clusters to have similar outcomes. For example, the management of patients within a single general practice is more likely to be more similar than management across several practices (Campbell and Grimshaw 1998). There are several reasons why cluster randomised trials are currently considered instead of other designs, but the following reasons are most commonly given. 1} The intervention to be studied is itself delivered to and affects groups of people rather than individuals, e.g. use of local radio for health promotion. 2} The intervention is targeted at health professionals with the aim of studying its impact on patient outcomes, e.g. education about guidelines for a particular medical condition. 3) Likely contamination of control arms by interventions aimed at intervention arms (e.g. nurses in control arms being inadvertently exposed to educational interventions because they work in the same clinic). It is however worth noting that, because outcomes among subjects in the same cluster may be similar (e.g. patients in different geographical areas may be more severely ill than in other areas) and because their management may also be similar (e.g. if different clinics have different norms or if some nurses are more effective than others) independence of observation cannot be assumed in the analysis. This non-independence is taken care of by estimating and adjusting for intra-cluster correlation of outcomes within clusters (Donner and Klar 2001). The non-independence has the disadvantage of reducing a trial's statistical power, and therefore larger sample sizes are usually needed to achieve a given degree 30 of power. One method of adjusting for such cluster sampling design effect is incorporated in the Stata statistical package (StataCorp 2003). Many cluster randomised trials have been conducted globally and locally to evaluate the effectiveness of health service interventions. Most of these trials investigate the effectiveness of implementing guidelines for management of certain diseases that are of public health importance (Kerry and Bland 1998, Flottorp et al 2002) 1.8 CONCLUDING REMARKS This chapter has given an overview of the current burden and primary health care of respiratory conditions. Respiratory conditions of public health importance discussed are upperllower respiratory tract infections, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma and tuberculosis combined with HIV/AIDS. A global scenario followed by that of South Africa and the Free State province were given in terms of the current morbidity, mortality and trends, followed by future projections of each disease. From the literature reviewed, it is evident that adult lung diseases that are of public health importance to South Africa and other developing countries, notably, tuberculosis, upper and lower respiratory tract infections, asthma, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can be managed at primary health care level. The challenge is to determine whether this is true in a resource limited setting like rural Free State. Effective treatments have been shown to be available. Of importance are implementation of treatment guidelines and essential drug lists that are developed at national and local level and adoption of effective information dissemination strategies of national policies. Nurses are an integral component of health care service delivery. However, their formal training for improvement in diagnosis and 31 treatment of these respiratory conditions has not proven to be effective, thus warranting the need for further research to plan effective training methods. It was with these points in mind, and using the best available evidence, that a team of PALSA researchers developed a training package for primary health care nurses in a South African setting with high logistical and human resource constraints. The purpose of the trial was to assess its effectiveness through a cluster randomised controlled trial. Alongside the randomized controlled trial was a validation study of the South African adapted guidelines that was conducted in Cape Town. Results of the validation study will soon be out and shared with relevant stakeholders as well. 1.9 AIM OF THE STUDY The aim of the study was to estimate the effectiveness of implementation of the Practical Approach to Lung Health in South Africa (PALSA) on the processes and outcomes of respiratory care in Free State Government primary health care clinics. 1.10 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY The objectives of the study were to estimate the effectiveness of the intervention on the following outcomes: 1.10.1 Primary outcomes To improve the process of care 1.10.1.1 To reduce the rate of antibiotic prescription. 1.10.1.2 To increase the rate of inhaled steroid prescription. 32 1.10.1.3 To increase the rate of sending of sputa for tuberculosis testing. 1.10.1.4 To increase appropriate use of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis in known tuberculosis cases. To improve health outcomes 1.10.1.5 To reduce the rate of interference with usual activity due to illness. 1.10.2 Secondary outcomes To improve the process of care 1.10.2.1 To increase appropriate referral of patients with severe respiratory disease (appropriately defined as respiratory rate ~ 30 breaths/minute, breathless on talking or at rest, use of accessory muscles, temperature ~ 38 degrees Celsius). 1.10.2.2 To increase the percentage of patients offered VCCT/HIV counselling. 1.10.2.3 To increase the percentage of current smokers receiving counselling for smoking cessation. To improve health outcomes 1.10.2.4 To increase the rate of readiness to quit smoking among current smokers. 1.10.2.5 To increase the rate of smoking cessation among current 33 smokers. 1.10.2.6 To increase the tuberculosis case detection rate. 1.10.2.7 To reduce the rate of mortality. 1.10.2.8 To decrease the frequency of difficulty sleeping due to chest symptoms. 1.10.2.9 To decrease the frequency of chest symptoms during daytime. 1.10.2.10 To decrease the frequency of interference of chest problems with usual activities. 1.10.2.11 To improve each domain of the Ea-50 quality of life measurement and the combined score. Health Care utilisation 1.10.2.12 To reduce the rate of unplanned visits to clinics. 1.10.2.13 To reduce admissions to hospitals. 34 CHAPTER 2- METHODS 2.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter will start by giving a description of the PALSA intervention. This will be followed by an overview of the design and methods of the randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of the PALSA intervention. 2.2 PALSA INTERVENTION 2.2.1 Description The PALSA intervention package was intended to reduce the burden and costs of priority lung disease in the Free State, and to also provide evidence to support rational decision-making regarding implementation. The intervention comprised the following components, described in detail below. 1. Academic detailing consisting of 3 to 4 training sessions of primary care nursing practitioners per clinic delivered on-site by district TB co-ordinators over 9 weeks. 2. Dissemination of clinical practice guidelines and support materials e.g. desk blotter, pens, penholders and butterfly fridge magnets for each trained nurse. 3. Changes in prescribing provisions for primary care nurses (cotrimoxazole prophylaxis for symptomatic HIV infected persons, initiation and step-up or step- down of inhaled steroids for asthma, short course oral steroids (prednisone) for exacerbation of asthma and COPD). 4. Doctor sensitization about PALSA by personally addressed letters. 35 2.2.2 Schedule 2.2.2.1 Training of TB coordinators as PALSA trainers In February 2003, 13 district TB coordinators received a one week training as PALSA trainers in Cape Town. The training was facilitated by a privately employed anthropologist. Other resource persons were PALSA researchers who were involved in the designing and production of the PALSA intervention materials. The training involved theoretical lectures on the following 6 topics: severity markers of respiratory diseases, upper and lower respiratory tract infections, asthma, COPD, TB and HIV/AIDS. Participants were given an opportunity to design their own training plans and methods using the PALSA intervention materials. PALSA materials included the locally adapted guidelines (attached as Annex 1), a desk blotter, a flip chart, an inhaler, and fridge magnets. The theoretical lectures were followed by teaching exposure by teaching clinic nurses in two primary care clinics in Cape Town with each trainer's teaching lesson video taped. The teaching sessions were followed by comments from PALSA researchers assigned to the two clinics on how each session was conducted, with special attention drawn to time taken, innovation and involvement of the trainees. Each trainer was given an opportunity to review the recorded session and also received comments from the rest of the training resource persons through a joint session. Each trainer indicated suitable dates for conducting PALSA trainings in their respective districts. From these individual trainers' schedules an overall training schedule for the whole province was drawn up by PALSA researchers, from April to August 2003. At the end of the week long training, the 13 trainers were issued with certificates as PALSA trainers. During training of PALSA trainers (TB coordinators) in Cape Town, it was decided by PALSA researchers that, prior to commencement of the clinic staff training, one of the researchers responsible for the qualitative assessment of the project would undertake three regional quality check sessions of the trainers. The quality check 36 sessions entailed conducting training of clinic staff in non-trial clinics by PALSA trainers under supervision of PALSA researchers. The training sessions were video taped and feedback given immediately to the trainers on their performance in preparation for the PALSA training. 2.2.2.2 Training of clinic nursing staff The PALSA training of trainers was followed by delivery of intervention materials to each trainer. The quantity of materials varied according to the number of clinics each trainer was allocated and the number of trainees in each clinic. Each package comprised the PALSA Clinical Practice Guideline and support materials namely, a desk blotter, pen and penholder and a butterfly fridge magnet. These support materials bore short key messages on respiratory diseases, together with a PALSA logo. Trainees were mainly primary care nursing practitioners who had received full PHC training and who therefore saw sick patients and prescribed in the clinics. They included chief professional nurses, senior professional nurses, professional nurses, and senior enrolled nurses, depending on how each clinic operated. The allocation of clinics for training was done in such a way that no trainer was overburdened with more than four clinics. The main reasons for this were to avoid fatigue and because trainers had other responsibilities other than TB or PALSA related activities in their respective districts. Each clinic received a total of three to four training sessions from each PALSA trainer. The training was conducted at each clinic to avoid having to take the nurses away from the clinic for a period of time. During each training visit, the trainer took 50% of the nurses for about thirty minutes covering at least three of the six PALSA topics. After the first session, the trainer then trained the remaining 50% of the clinic staff. After every training session at the intervention clinic, each trainer completed a training form that indicated the number of clinic nurses trained by cadre, topics covered, time spent at the clinic, amount of money spent on 37 refreshments and fuel during that particular visit. An example of the training form is attached as Annex 2. 2.2.2.3 Official communication with district management teams Delivery of PALSA intervention materials to the clinics was followed by official letters to district management teams in each of the five districts of the province. These were mainly the district manager him/herself, Chief executive officer, Senior executive officer, local area managers and clinic managers. The letter informed them about PALSA as an intervention project, progress made so far and planned PALSA training due to take place in their respective districts. The letter explained the types of support expected from each district management to ensure the success of the project. A copy of such a standard letter is attached as Annex 3. Data on the 40 trial clinics regarding nursing staff complement, operation hours, and special/fast lanes were provided to the PALSA researchers by the district management authorities, who were mainly district and clinic managers. These data helped plan how much training/intervention material was required by each intervention clinic. 2.2.2.4 Sensitization of medical doctors Concurrent to the district management letters, "sensitization" letters were sent to doctors operating in those hospitals to which the intervention clinics refer their patients, those doctors who are assigned to the intervention clinics on a part or full-time basis, and private doctors operating in the neighbourhood of intervention clinics. The letters were in both English and Afrikaans. The letters were issued because these doctors interacted with potential PALSA patients and therefore had to be aware of changes that were to be brought about by the intervention, especially to the prescribing responsibilities of clinic nurses. An English version of the doctors' letter is attached as Annex 4. 38 2.2.2.5 Provincial drug circular on PALSA drugs Prior to commencement of PALSA training, which was scheduled to start on the week beginning April 7th 2003, the provincial health department through the office of the General Manager, Health Support, Or. Ron Chapman, wrote a circular defining changes to prescribing to clinic managers of intervention clinics. The circular informed clinic managers about the department's decision about changes to prescription for PALSA patients during the trial. The managers were urged to ensure that the referred to drugs were ordered on time and stocked effectively to avoid stock out at all cost. The managers were referred to specific offices to ensure smooth operation. The circular is attached as Annex 5. 2.3 STUDY DESIGN The study was a cluster randomized controlled trial. The unit of randomization was a primary health care clinic. Inferences about the effectiveness of primary care nurse training were based on examination of patient level outcomes. Patients and personnel recording outcomes were blind to the intervention or control status of each clinic. It was however not possible to blind health care staff at the intervention clinics even though the researchers referred to anything related to the training of clinic staff as PALSA while anything to do with the data collection process as Lung Health survey. Figure 2.1 below is an illustration of the study design. 39 Figure 2.1: Study design Intervention clinics Control clinics 20 clinics 20 clinics INTERVENTION PACKAGE Usual practice (a) PALSA guidelines (b) Academic detailing training (3-4 sessions) (c) Changes in prescribing by nurses (d) Doctors sensitization lo 1st post-intervention survey 1st post-intervention survey I 4 weeks after training Follow up Follow up 3 months after 1st post- 3 months after 1st post- intervention survey intervention survey 40 2.4 STUDY POPULATION 2.4.1 Clinics The study took place in the 40 largest primary health care clinics of the Free State Government with the following exceptions: Bloemfontein clinics were excluded due to frequent rotation of nursing staff and because many Bloemfontein patients are managed by doctors. Nurse rotation could have led to contamination of control clinics with trained nurses, and doctors could have diluted effects of nurse training. Thaba Nchu area clinics were used for piloting the project's intervention materials and data collection tools and were therefore also excluded from the study. A purposive sample of the 40 remaining largest clinics was therefore selected for logistical and recruitment purposes of eligible patients. Figure 2.2 shows how the 40 trial clinics were arrived at from a total of 236 primary health care clinics in the Free State province. 41 Figure 2.2: PALSA Rel clinic selection 236 Primary health care clinics in the Free State 25 Bloemfontein clinics excluded (frequent rotation of nursing staff and patients seen by doctors) 11 Thaba Nchu clinics excluded (pilot sites for intervention and data collection materials) 200 Primary health care clinics l 40 largest primary care clinics selected by size (above 5 year olds during t" quarter 2001), stratified by health district and randomized in blocks of 4. Thaba Mofutsanyane (12), Lejweleputswa (12), Northem (10), Motheo (4), Xhariep (2) , 20 Intervention clinics 20 Control clinics Thaba Mofutsanyane (6) Thaba MoMsanyane (6) Lejweleputswa (6) Lejweleputswa (6) Northern (5) Northern (5) Motheo (2) Motheo (2) Xhariep (1) Xhariep (1) 2.4.2 Patients We aimed to recruit 50 patients per clinic, that is, 2000 patients in total. 42 The patient inclusion criteria were as follows: - All patients 15 years and older. And one or more of the following: _ Patients reporting difficulty breathing on the day of presentation or in the last 6 months. Patients reporting cough for more than a week or recurrent cough in the last 6 months. - Patients reporting cough for less than 1 week but with a marker of severe disease (respiratory rate ~ 30 and/or temperature ~ 38°C). The exclusion criteria were as follows: - Unconscious patients - Patients who appeared unable to breathe adequately to be interviewed - Patients who were unable to talk adequately to be interviewed - Patients who appeared psychotic (clearly hallucinating, unable to sit still, aggressive) - Patients who were only seen by a doctor on the day of presentation. Patients were selected from the general queue as well as the TB queue at each clinic. 43 2.5 SAMPLE SIZE ASSUMPTION AND ESTIMATES Results of the pilot study revealed the following points: 70% of patients interviewed had antibiotic prescriptions 17% of patients interviewed had inhaled steroid prescriptions 50% of patients interviewed had problems with their usual activities To decrease antibiotic prescription by 10% (from 70% to 60%) with 90% power and 5% significance, we would require 500 patients per arm. Because of cluster randomisation, we assumed that we needed to double the number and therefore needed 1000 per arm. To increase inhaled steroids prescription by 10% (from 17% to 26%) with 90% power and 5% significance, we would require 458 patients per arm. Because of cluster randomisation, we assumed that we needed to double the number and therefore needed 916 per arm. To decrease the frequency of problems with usual activities by 10% (from 50% to 40%) with 90% power and 5% significance, we would require 538 patients per arm. Because of cluster randomisation, we assumed that we needed to double the number and therefore needed 1076 per arm. From the above assumptions, we estimated that the sample size had to be approximately 1000 in each arm of the trial. 2.6 RANDOMISATION The 40 largest primary care clinics in the province were first ranked by size (headcount of patients over 5 years old during the 1st quarter of 2001), stratified by district and then randomised in blocks of 4. All the 5 districts of the province were 44 represented. Figure 2.3 below is the Free State provincial map showing the distribution of the trial clinics by district. In randomising the clinics some complexities arose. Initially the 40 largest clinics were from only four districts of the province, namely Motheo, Lejweleputswa, Northern and Thaba Mofutswanyane. The district that was not represented was Xhariep. It however came to the attention of the researchers just before commencement of PALSA training of trainers that one of the Northern district's clinic, Koppies appeared twice in the sample of randomised clinics, but under different names. The next largest clinic, Petrusburg, was from Xhariep which was originally not represented. To include another clinic from the same district, the next largest clinic in Xhariep, Matlakeng was included. This meant that the last largest clinic in the Northern district, Sasolburg town clinic, had to be excluded from the study. Two months after commencement of field work, but before field work commenced at the clinic, one of the control clinics, Osizweni, had to be closed down due to logistical and administrative problems beyond our control. Patients attending the clinic were for logistical and administrative reasons referred to three neighbouring clinics, one of which was Sasolburg town clinic which had been excluded from the study. A decision was then taken by the researchers to once again include Sasolburg town clinic to the study's control arm, for the following reasons: - Patients from Osizweni clinic were already being referred to Sasolburg town clinic for logistical and administrative reasons, meaning that most of the patients would have still been from Osizweni clinic anyway. - Sasolburg town clinic had initially met the criteria for selection to the study (which was size) but had only been excluded to make way for the Xhariep district clinic. If it had been in the clinic sample instead of Osizweni it would have been allocated to the control group. Substitution was done without the researchers' prior 45 Figure 2.2: Free State Provincial Map Showing Trial Clinics by District (Adapted from DHLG 2004) +>- 0\ ~.~. I = Intervention Clinics . ~~0~..u.PP.O.u. C = Control Clinicss .... . • . . •WATERKLOOF· " knowledge of Sasolburg town clinic's performance, or types of services provided at the clinic. 2.7 ENROLMENT OF PARTICIPANTS 2.7.1 Assessment of eligibility and enrolment After registering and while waiting to be seen by the clinic nurse and/or doctor, patients were screened for eligibility to participate in the study by using the screening question, "Do you have cough and/ or difficulty breathing today or in the last 6 months?" This was asked of a" patients that were 15 years or older. All patients whose response was "yes" to this screening question were then requested to report to the interviewer to provide more details about their illness, after being seen by the nurse/doctor and collecting medication. A systematic selection process was applied to avoid eligible patients having to queue for interviews. The selection process is attached as Annex 6. After being seen by a clinic nurse and/or doctor and collecting medication, patients who had been identified by team leaders as potential candidates were further screened by the interviewers for inclusion. This entailed establishing the severity and duration of the presenting respiratory problem and taking respiratory rate and temperature. A patient screening questionnaire (Annex 7) was used for establishing the severity and duration of the respiratory problems of eligible patients. Temperature and respiratory rates were measured using an alcohol and/or mercury thermometer and a stop watch, respectively. Patients who had only been seen by a doctor on that day were excluded from the study. However those seen by both the doctor and nurse were considered for inclusion. Upon qualification, informed consent was then sought from eligible patients for enrolment to the study after a thorough explanation of what the study was about. 47 2.7.2 Informed consent Eligible patients were asked to complete a consent form that briefly explained the background, purpose and methods of the trial. It also clearly stated that: participation was voluntary; that a patient could withdraw at any time and would not be discriminated against by the trial or clinic staff; that he/she would be interviewed by a field worker and would at the end of the interview be requested to come back for a follow-up visit three months after the initial visit. The consent form also indicated that all participants were entitled to a food voucher/parcel worth sixty Rand (R60) that they would receive on the day of the follow up visit to the clinic or at a place of their choice. If they consented, each participant was asked to sign a consent form that was written in either Sesotho, Xhosa, Zulu, Afrikaans or English. The English version of the patient information and written consent form is attached as Annex 8. At the end of the interview, participants were given a reminder form, indicating the exact date of the follow-up interview as well as venue for the interview. The reminder form is attached as Annex 9. 2.8 DATA COLLECTION TOOLS 2.8.1 First post-intervention survey and follow-up interview questionnaire Both first post-intervention survey (Annex 10) and follow-up (Annex 11) questionnaires were developed with clinical input of respiratory disease physicians from the UCT Lung Institute. The questionnaires comprised questions about the presence of a cough and or difficulty breathing, in terms of severity and duration. The questionnaire then went on to establish presence of other symptoms related to either the upper or lower respiratory tract infections and their severities during the day and night. The questionnaire included 3 respiratory questions adapted from the St. George's Hospital respiratory questionnaire (Barr et al 2000). These 48 covered difficulty sleeping due to chest symptoms, chest symptoms during the day and interference with usual activities due to chest symptoms. The questionnaire also included the international EuroQol-5D questionnaire (The EuroQol group 1990). This comprises questions about 5 dimensions of quality of life, namely mobility, self-care, interference with usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. EuroQol-5D questions are combined into a weighted scale, indicating quality of life. A score of 100 represents perfect health and a score of 0 represents death. Permission was sought from and granted by the EuroQol group to the PALSA team to translate and pilot test the translated versions of the EuroQol questionnaire. The questionnaire was translated to Sesotho, Zulu, Xhosa and Afrikaans. Approval for its use was granted upon the EuroQol group's satisfaction that the translation and pilot testing procedures were followed appropriately. Questions regarding smoking habits and counselling on cessation also formed part of the questionnaire. An abbreviated form of a questionnaire devised by DiClemente and Prochaska, which classifies patients according to their readiness to quit smoking, was used (DiClemente and Prochaska 1982). Also included were questions on details of the patients' consultation with nurse practitioners, further tests ordered, emergency treatments given, prescriptions given, regular/on-going medication taken by patients and referral to a doctor at the clinic, to hospital, or to other health care service providers. Questions on health care utilisation and their financial implications on the patient also formed part of the questionnaire. In particular these questions established different health care providers that the patient utilised in the last three months and expenditure incurred on each visit to such health care providers. Several utilisation questions covered variables to be used for an economic evaluation, which is beyond the scope of this thesis. 49 There were several differences between the first post-intervention survey and follow-up questionnaires. Firstly, the first post-intervention survey questionnaire had a patient screening section by which eligible patients were identified whereas the follow-up did not. Secondly, the follow-up questionnaire had a number of questions on patient satisfaction with health care at the clinic where she/he regularly went or where the interview was conducted. Satisfaction in this case pertained to clinic staff attitudes and availability of essential resources such as adequately skilled nursing staff and drugs. Because of the diversity of languages in the Free State, the first post-intervention survey and follow up questionnaires, reminder, and consent forms (issued during the first post-intervention survey) were translated from English into four local languages that are commonly spoken in the province. These are Sesotho, Afrikaans, Xhosa and Zulu. In total the questionnaire was in five different languages and interviews were conducted in an individual patient's choice of language. 2.8.2. Visual aids As part of the questionnaire (first post-intervention survey and follow-up), interviewers used a visual aid document that assisted interviewees to identify and give correct answers to some questions. The visual aid comprised of two main parts namely: 2.8.2.1 Euroqol-5D questionnaire including scale This was a locally adapted Euroqol-5D questionnaire which included a scale, written in the 5 different languages of English, Afrikaans, Zulu, Xhosa and Sotho. This part was meant to assist patients to identify where they fell in relation to health-related quality of life within the five domains i.e. mobility, self care, usual activity, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression (See pages 7 and 8 of Annex 11). 50 2.8.2.2 Photographs (Annex 12) This was a set of photographs relating to the following required information: a) Different modes of transport used in the province, and this included a taxi, train, bus, animal wagon, private motor vehicle, ambulance, bicycle and walking. b) Other health care providers in the province, and this included a hospital, another primary health care clinic, mobile ambulance, workplace clinic, private doctor, traditional healer and pharmacy/chemist. c) Prescription information showing different reliever and preventer inhalers, antibiotic tablets for other respiratory conditions and nasal sprays. 2.8.3 Notification of deceased patients form For patients who died during the 3 month period between the first post-intervention survey and follow-up interviews, interviewers were asked to request a copy of a death certificate of the deceased patient, duly stamped and signed by appropriate authorities. The collected death certificates were then forwarded to the PALSA data management centre in Cape Town. In the absence of a death certificate, interviewers completed a notification of deceased patients at follow-up form (Annex 13) developed by PALSA researchers and submitted it in place of the death certificate. 2.8.4 Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) A PDA is a small hand-held device that was used for collecting data in place of a paper questionnaire. It functions as a small computer by having the questionnaire in the 5 languages formatted into it. The questionnaire can be retrieved and administered as with a paper version. The device was able to take up to 12 completed questionnaires at a time and to store them until the information was 51 11& 4-l81~ uploaded to a toll-free number to which it was connected from a direct land-line. This was a new method of data collection process pioneered by the Medical Research Council (MRC) of South Africa. It took about 3 minutes to upload 12 interviews from each PDA daily. During the first week of the first post-intervention survey data collection, the first four teams that did field work used paper questionnaires because the PDA was not yet ready for use. Subsequently, all four teams used PDA. The remaining two teams also started with paper versions and switched to PDA on week two of their schedule. In total about 500 paper questionnaires were used, including only two used during follow-up. This happened when two interviewers of the Bethlehem Team had gone to the village in search of patients who were supposed to come for follow-up interviews at the clinic but did not turn up. It was while they were away that two other patients arrived at the clinic and the team leader interviewed them using paper questionnaires because she did not have a PDA at the time. 2.9 PILOT OF TRAINING AND DATA COLLECTION PROCESSES Table 2.1 summarises interviews conducted during piloting of training and data collection tools. In November 2001, piloting of intervention materials, and in particular the academic detailing method of training, was conducted for nursing practitioners from three primary care clinics of Thaba Nchu district. The clinics were Gaongalelwe, Thaba Nchu and Tiger River. A total of 8 Chief Professional Nurses (CPN) from the three clinics received the academic detailing training in two sessions, each lasting for an hour. Training materials used were the flip chart, the guidelines and the desk blotter. From then on the three clinics were used for piloting other project intervention materials and data collection tools. The pilot exercise concentrated on the academic detailing method of training and data collection tools, particularly the screening and the first post-intervention survey questionnaires, both the paper version and PDA. Information obtained from 52 the pilot was used to adapt the training to local conditions, to make an assessment of the number of eligible patients that could be interviewed per day per clinic, to assess feasibility and duration of an interview, and to assess possible obstacles to follow up patients. The pilot also served as a final check of clinic staff knowledge and skills needs. Table 2.1 Summary of interviews conducted during piloting of PALSA Date Purpose Number interviewed Interviewer(s) 08-10/11/02 To pilot test draft lof 3 in T/Nchu clinic B.Majara the first post- 4 in GAO clinic intervention 2 in Tiger River clinic questionnaire. (paper version) 28-30/12/02 To pilot test draft II of 4 in T/Nchu clinic B.Majara the first post- 3 in GAO intervention 2 in Tiger River clinic questionnaire. (paper version) 12-13/02/03 To pilot test draft III of 3 inT/Nchu clinic B.Majara the first post- 4 in GAO clinic intervention and 3 in Tiger River clinic screening questionnaire. (paper version) 18-19/03/03 To pilot test draft IV 9 in T/Nchu clinic B.Majara (Supervisor) (final) of the first post- 6 in GAO clinic C.Seegreht (PDA intervention and the supervisor) screening I.Duma questionnaires. V.Rammile (paper &PDA version) 03/07/03 To pilot test draft III of 2 in T/Nchu clinic B.Majara (Supervisor) the follow-up 1 in GAO clinic I.Duma questionnaire. V.Rammile (paper &PDA version) 53 Because of the role that the three clinics played in serving as pilot, they were excluded from participating in the trial even though they were large enough to have been included. 2.10 INTERVIEWERS 2.10.1 Recruitment of interviewers for the first post-intervention survey and follow-up interviews. A total of 23 field workers were recruited to collect data. They were recruited by the Centre for Health Systems Research and Development at the University of the Free State from 6 strategic areas within the province. The aim was to assign each team enough clinics to conduct interviews without incurring unnecessary expenditure, given the limited budget for the project. The teams were recruited from Parys, Bothaville, Welkom, Bloemfontein, Bethlehem and QwaQwa. The candidates were mainly matriculants, some with tertiary education in nursing and social sciences. Ages ranged from 24 to 45 years. Each team comprised 3 to 4 field workers depending on the locality and number of clinics assigned for conducting interviews. The teams comprised a team leader and 2 to 3 interviewers. Three supervisors were recruited to monitor and oversee 2 of the 6 regional teams each, these being allocated by region and proximity. A list of responsibilities of the field workers is attached as Annex 14. 2.10.2 Training of interviewers The training of the field workers for the first post-intervention survey interviews was conducted during April 28 to May 2, 2003 in Bloemfontein. The training was conducted at the Centre for Health Systems Research and Development, University of the Free State. Facilitators were PALSA researchers who were involved in the development of the first post-intervention survey questionnaire as we" as staff of the CHSR&D with experience on the data collection process. The 54 training focused mainly on the first post-intervention survey questionnaire itself, interviewing techniques, clinical respiratory signs and symptoms as well as appropriate data collection techniques using paper questionnaires and PDA, thermometers and stop watches. Participants were then exposed to practical experience by conducting interviews at three of the pilot clinics in Thaba Nchu area. At the end of the three day training, all 40 clinics of the trial were listed alphabetically and each assigned a two digit code. Field workers were also grouped by teams, listed alphabetically within each team and each was assigned a two digit code as well. At the beginning of an interview, whether using the paper or PDA version of the questionnaire, the interviewer was required to fill in the clinic and interviewer codes on the questionnaire before proceeding with the contents of the questionnaire. This was meant to facilitate tracing a questionnaire if further clarification was required during the editing process. Training of field workers for follow-up interviews was conducted during July 19-20, 2003, also in Bloemfontein. Only 18 field workers were trained this time because three had resigned from the project while two were unable to come for training due to ill health. Field workers were given a summary of how the first phase of the first post-intervention survey data collection had gone, that is, what had gone well or not well. They were then taken through the follow-up questionnaire. Because follow-up interviews were going to be conducted either at the clinic or the patient's home, logistical implications of such trips were discussed with CHSR&D. Logistical and administrative issues relating to food parcels that were to be given to patients during follow-up interviews were also discussed with teams. New responsibilities of team leaders were discussed. The training took one and half days. 55 Training of fieldworkers on first post-intervention survey and follow-up interviews was conducted using the questionnaires' fieldwork manuals compiled by Dr. Lara Fairall from the UCT Lung Institute, and Mr. Bosielo Majara from the University of the Free State. The manuals are attached as Annexes 15-1, 15-11 & 16 respectively. The manuals included the respective questionnaires, as attached in Annexes 7 and 8. 2.10.3 Blinding of interviewers To avoid contamination of data to be collected, both the patient and the interviewer were blinded as to the intervention or control status of each clinic. A "Blinding Circular" was drafted by the PALSA researchers and circulated among themselves and the PALSA trainers (TB coordinators). This stated that in order to ensure blinding in the trial, the two activities, the PALSA training and recruitment of the cohort, should be separated from each other. Anything to do with training of clinic staff in the 20 intervention clinics was referred to as "PALSA" while anything to do with interviews of patients with respiratory problems in the 40 trial clinics was referred to as the "Lung Health Survey (lHS)". The circular requested PAlSA trainers to refrain from assisting PALSA researchers with anything to do with the LHS interviews. Responsibility for administrative and logistics support of the LHS was left in the hands of LHS supervisors and the PAlSA researchers themselves. Schedules for both the training and field work were compiled so that both activities did not take place in the same week in one clinic. Field work at a given intervention clinic was conducted exactly four weeks after that clinic had received at least two sessions training. Control clinics, on the other hand. had interviews conducted without any particular order as blinding was unnecessary. During training of the field workers no mention was made about the survey being part of a trial that involved intervention and control arms. 56 2.11 DATA COLLECTION PROCESS For the first post-intervention survey interviews, the 6 teams were each assigned 7 to 8 clinics, belonging to both intervention and control arms, according to their location in the province. Data collection commenced on the week beginning May 5th 2003 for the first post-intervention survey and the week beginning July 28th 2003 for follow-up interviews. The entire data collection process started on May 5th and went up to November 28th 2003. The teams spent three to five days at a clinic, recruiting a target of about 50 patients per clinic during the first post-intervention survey interviews. Patients were then requested to return for follow-up interviews three months after the initial visit at a place of their choice, this being either at the clinic or their homes. All recruited patients were issued with consent and reminder forms that served as proof that they were seen and interviewed at the first post-intervention survey. Follow-up interviews were conducted three months after the first post-intervention survey using a follow-up questionnaire that differed slightly from the first post- intervention survey questionnaire. Lists of the 50 patients recruited at each clinic during the first post-intervention survey interviews were consolidated by the MRC, Cape Town, and the research team's data management centre. The lists had patients' name, folder number, age and/or date of birth, contact address and telephone numbers where applicable. The lists were sent to the supervisors and team leaders a week before follow-up interviews to facilitate contacting and reminding of patients about the follow up interview. The interviews were conducted at either the clinic or at patients' homes, based on their preference. If patients failed to come for a follow-up interview at the clinic on agreed upon dates, the interviewers waited until 1200H, after which they went to look for the patients at their homes using residential addresses provided during the first post- intervention survey interviews. In the case of patients who died during the 3 57 months period, relatives were requested to provide interviewers with certified copies of death certificates or to complete a notification of deceased patients form (See 2.7.3). Relatives were given the food parcel that was due to the deceased. For hospitalised or too ill to be interviewed as well as untraceable patients, interviewers confirmed reasons why such patients could not be interviewed during the follow-up period and conveyed a written confirmation to that effect to PALSA data management centre in Cape Town. 2.12 QUALITY CONTROL Quality control of implementation of the project was done in three separate ways. 2.12.1 Quality control of the data collection process During the first post-intervention survey and follow-up interviews, team leaders of the six teams conducted quality control of patient interviews by re-interviewing 20% of the patients using five key questions extracted from both the first post- intervention survey and follow-up questionnaires. The five re-interview questions were chosen from the questionnaire by PALSA researchers on a monthly basis. The team leader compared the answers he/she obtained with those of the interviewer. In the case of a difference they verified the results with the patient while still at the clinic and infonned the interviewer about the difference. If the same interviewer continued to make the same mistake over a certain period he/she was warned that disciplinary measures could be taken. This did not happen, however. On the last Friday of every month, the PALSA data management centre in Cape Town compiled a full report of all re-interviews conducted by team leaders, highlighting important omissions and common mistakes during that month. These reports were e-mailed to all the supervisors for onward transmission to the team leaders for action. This had to be done before starting field work at the next clinic. 58 The May 2003 re-interview questionnaire is attached as Annex 17. 2.12.2 Periodic supervisory visits by the PALSA researchers Even though the project had recruited a team of 3 supervisors whose main responsibilities were to monitor and ensure smooth data collection, PALSA researchers also conducted periodic visits to the project sites, providing technical and back-up support to both the PALSA trainers and field workers though separately. The main task was checking of completed paper questionnaires, especially during the start of cohort recruitment when the PDA was not yet in use. The researchers also supported the supervisors in ensuring that PDAs were uploaded on a daily basis, and providing feedback to the supervisors on specific data collection errors that required certain interviewers' attention. 2.12.3 Single database To ensure a standard channel of transmitting collected data, researchers agreed on MRC, Cape Town to be the PALSA data management centre. All paper versions of the questionnaire were collected by team leaders after proof-reading, sealed and couriered to Centre for Health Systems Research & Development for onward transmission to MRC, Cape Town. Information collected by PDA was uploaded on a daily basis and transmitted to MRC, Cape Town using two toll-free numbers by team leaders. The uploading process either took place at the clinic where interviews were conducted or at the team leader's home. 2.13 ETHICS AND CONSENT The intervention posed minimal risk of causing harm, since it was mainly a training strategy that was meant to build on existing methods. The main ethical issues were therefore confidentiality and consent. Upon completion of the follow-up interviews, patients were thanked and given a food parcel worth R60 that they had 59 been informed about by interviewers during the first post-intervention survey interviews. The food parcel was meant to motivate patients to return for follow-up interviews as well as to serve as a token of thanks by PALSA researchers. 2.13.1 Provincial Health Department PALSA researchers were granted permission to conduct the randomised controlled trial using the government's health facilities, that is, primary care clinics, clinic staff and patients by the Free State Provincial Health Department through the office of the Director General (DG), Department of Health. 2.13.2 University of the Free State Ethics Committee Prior to field work, that is, collection of data for the trial, the research team submitted a protocol of the study for approval to the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State. Permission was granted by the Ethics Committee for the researchers to conduct the study (ETOVS NR 42/03). 2.13.3 Patient consent forms Upon meeting the criteria for eligibility to participate in the study, each patient was given a thorough explanation of what the study was about, what it entailed and requested verbal and written consent (See 2.6.2). 2.13.4 Confidentiality Patient identities and questionnaire responses were treated as confidential and were known only to the researchers. Paper and electronic records were stored securely and were only known to researchers. Clinic identities were treated as confidential. Staff identities were not recorded. 60 2.14 DATA CHECKING 2.14.1 Data uploaded by PDA on daily basis The interviewers were advised during training, particularly during the first post- intervention survey questionnaire training, to upload data on a daily basis to the toll free numbers in Cape Town to avoid loss of data. The uploaded data were immediately entered into the database upon receipt. Data that were not entered correctly and/or had queries were compiled into a weekly list that was sent back to supervisors and team leaders for follow up and rectification. This was routinely done by researchers based in Cape Town from the beginning up to the end of the data collection process. 2.14.2 Data collected by paper questionnaires Data that were collected using paper questionnaires were first checked by supervisors before being sent to the Centre for Health Systems Research and Development, University of the Free State for forwarding to the data management centre in Cape Town. Questionnaires that were not complete or had queries were sent back to team leaders for tracing and following up with patients in question. Upon correction and/or rectification by team leaders who also signed for the corrections on the questionnaire, the paper versions were then couriered to the PALSA data management centre at MRC, Cape Town for entry into the research database. Prior to final entry of all paper questionnaires onto the research database, all paper questionnaires were checked for completeness of the questionnaires, correct skipping of questions and making sure that incorrectly spelt names were corrected by the Sotho speaking PALSA researcher based at the Community Health Department of the University of the Free State (B. Majara). This was because about 90% of the participants were Sotho speaking and were therefore 61 interviewed in Sotho. The edited paper questionnaires were then entered, using the double entry process by data capturers at MRC, Cape Town. 2.15 DATA ANALYSIS Statistical analysis aimed to estimate the precision (95% confidence interval) of each measure of effect, and to estimate the probability (P value) of obtaining at least as large an effect if the respective null hypothesis was true (Altman 1991). Five primary outcomes were specified in advance (see section 1.10.1), to reduce the probability of finding a significant effect by chance as a result of multiple hypothesis testing. However we also examined a larger number of predefined secondary outcomes of interest (see section1.10.2), bearing in mind the chance of finding significant effects due to multiple comparisons. Table 2.2 below summarises the numerators and denominators used for each outcome. Outcome variables were compared between patients in intervention and control arms. For binary and ordered categorical outcome measures we compared proportions, and calculated odds ratios (that is, the odds of each outcome in the intervention arm divided by the odds in the control arm). For normally distributed continuous outcome measures we compared means (and standard deviations), and estimated differences between means. For continuous outcome measures with distributions that were not normal we compared medians, and estimated the odds ratio of having a higher value in the intervention arm compared to the control arm. 62 Table 2.2: Numerators and denominators for outcomes Outcome Numerator Denominator Primary outcomes 1. Antibiotic prescription Number with antibiotic All patients recruited at the first- prescription at the first-post post intervention survey intervention survey 2. Inhaled steroids Number with inhaled steroids at All followed up patients prescription the first-post intervention survey or follow-up 3. Sputa for TB testing Number with TB sputa sent All at the first-post intervention survey with cough> 2 weeks, excluding known TB cases 4. Cotrimoxazole prophylaxis Number with prescribed Known TB cases at the first-post cotrimoxazole intervention survey 5. Improvement in Number with improvement in All followed up patients interference with usual EO-5D interference with usual activities (EO-5D) activities from the first-post intervention survey to follow-up among all followed up Secondary outcomes 1. Appropriate referrals Number with referral to any All patients with any of the 4 health service provider severity markers at first post- intervention survey (respiratory rate ~ 30. breathless on talking or at rest, use of accessory muscles, temperature ~ 38°C) 2. VCCT/HIV counselling Number who received All followed up patients VCCT/HIV counselling at the first-post intervention survey or follow-up 3. Counselling for smoking (a) Number who received Current smokers at the first-post cessation smoking counselling at the first- intervention survey post intervention survey (b) Number who received The first-post intervention survey smoking counselling at the first- smokers followed up post intervention surveyor follow-up 4. Increased readiness to quit Number with increased The first-post intervention survey smoking readiness to quit between the smokers followed up first-post intervention survey and follow-up 5. Smoking cessation Number of smokers who have All the first-post intervention quit smoking at follow up survey smokers 6. TB case detection rate New TB cases All followed up patients excluding 63 TB cases at the first-post intervention survey 7. Mortality rate (a) Patients deceased at follow All followed up patients including up (b) All known TB cases found All followed up TB cases deceased at follow-up 8. Difficulty sleeping due to Patients presenting with All followed up patients chest symptoms difficulty sleeping at follow-up 9. Chest symptoms during Patients presenting with chest All followed up patients daytime symptoms at follow-up 10. Interference with usual Patients presenting with All followed up patients activities due to chest interference with usual activities symptoms at follow-up 11. Domain of EQ-5D and combined score (a) Mobility Patients responding to EuroQo~ All followed up patients 5D mobility question (b) Self-care Patients responding to EuroQo~ All followed up patients 5D self-care question (c) Usual activity Patients responding to EuroQo~ All followed up patients 5D usual activity question (d) Pain/discomfort Patients responding to EuroQ~ All followed up patients 5D pain/discomfort question (e) Anxiety/depression Patients responding to EuroQo~ All followed up patients 5D anxiety/depression question 12. Number of visits to other Number of patients who All followed up patients health care providers reported visiting other health care providers between the first- post intervention survey and follow-up 13. Admissions to hospitals Number of patients who All followed up patients reported admissions to hospitals at follow up The cluster randomised study design necessitated adjustment of confidence intervals and P values to take account of cluster sampling design effects, which are determined by intra-cluster correlation coefficients (ICCs) (Donner and Klar 2001). ICCs in this study were the proportions of the total outcome variances that were accounted for by variances between patients within each clinic, as opposed to variances between clinics (Donner and Klar 2001). ICCs were estimated with 64 Stata statistical software, using the "large analysis of variance" ("Ioneway") command (StataCorp 2003). Confidence intervals and P values for comparisons between intervention and control arms were adjusted with the following regression methods in Stata, using Stata's "cluster" option for each model (StataCorp 2003). For binary outcome variables we used multiple logistic regression. For normally distributed continuous outcome variables we used multiple linear regression. For ordered categorical and count variables we used ordinal logistic regression. For count variables that appeared to be normally distributed on histograms (e.g. numbers of visits to other health care providers) we also used multiple linear regression as secondary analyses, to assess the robustness of the primary analyses. In each multiple regression model, intervention versus control arm was the main explanatory variable of interest. Because the randomisation of clinics was stratified by (five) districts, we also included dummy variables for district as explanatory variables in each model. In primary analyses involving all subjects recruited, or all subjects who were followed up, we did not adjust for any potential confounding between intervention and control arms. This was supported by the finding (see section 3.2.2) that patients in each arm at first post-intervention survey were comparable with regard to potential confounding variables, as a result of randomisation. However some outcomes were compared only among four subgroups of the study population, these being patients with cough for more than 2 weeks, not known TB cases, patients who are known TB cases, patients with one of the four severity markers, and current smokers at first post-intervention survey. For these subgroups too we compared patients' characteristics, symptoms and signs at the first pot- intervention survey. These comparisons generally provided reassurance that characteristics of intervention and control patients within each subgroup were balanced. For one subgroup namely patients with indicators of severe illness requiring referral, first post-intervention survey prevalence of certain prognostic symptoms differed between intervention and control groups. Therefore, as a 65 secondary analysis, we added these prognostic symptoms as explanatory variables in the regression model. For outcomes differing significantly between the intervention and control arms, numbers needed to treat were calculated. 2.16 RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CANDIDATE The PALSA project evaluation was a complex activity that involved a number of institutions and individuals each tasked with specific responsibilities (See Annex 18). The candidate undertook the following specific responsibilities: a) Participated in the designing and eventual write up of the randomised controlled trial's protocol that was submitted to the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Health Sciences University of the Free State. b) Conducted focus group discussions and attended meetings during development of the guideline. c) Participated in the training of district TB coordinators who served as PALSA trainers. d) Participated in the drafting and refining of both the first post-intervention survey and follow-up questionnaires. e) Led the process of piloting of data collection tools i.e. the screening questionnaire, first post-intervention survey and follow-up questionnaire (paper and PDA versions) for further refinement of the tools. f) Participated in the translation process of the data collection tools to the five local languages especially the Sesotho version, because Sesotho is the most commonly used local language in the Free State. This included translation of the English version of the Euroqol-5 questionnaire and instructions. g) Was responsible for communicating in writing with district health department authorities i.e. district mangers, hospital and clinic managers 66 about the trial's requirements, implementation dates and responses to any queries or clarification sought by the authorities on the project. h) Compiled the 40 trial clinics' profiles i.e. number of clinic nurses by staff category (e.g. Chief Professional Nurse, Principal Professional Nurse and Professional Nurse), daily patient load, and number of fast lanes by type of disease and operating hours. Such information was sought from and provided by the district and clinic authorities, namely district and clinic managers. i) Participated in the distribution of intervention materials to the PALSA trainers for distribution to clinic nurses during PALSA training sessions. j) Participated in the drafting of the first post-intervention survey and follow-up training manuals. k) Participated in the training of interviewers on both first post-intervention survey and follow-up questionnaires. I) Conducted supervisory and support visits of field work teams during the data collection process. m) Checked for completeness, spelling mistakes and proper filling of answers on all paper questionnaires prior to entry of collected data to the entire database. n) Archived consent forms of all participants by clinic. 0) During the data cleaning process, checked discrepancies between the first post-intervention survey and follow-up demographics of patients, and checked that patients met inclusion criteria. p) Assisted and discussed statistical analysis of data, which was led by the candidate's supervisors. The candidate was present during almost all analyses. He clarified the interpretation of relevant variables, and which patients comprised the respective numerator and denominator population for each outcome. During this process, the purpose and interpretation of each statistical test was discussed with him. q) Wrote the doctoral thesis. 67 CHAPTER 3- RESULTS 3.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter will give an overview of results obtained from the trial. First, to assess the effectiveness of randomization and the comparability of the trial arms, the characteristics of clinics and patients in intervention and control arms at the first post-intervention survey will be compared. Second, to assess the effectiveness of the intervention, patient outcomes will be compared between intervention and control groups. 3.2 RESULTS OF THE STUDY 3.2.1 Characteristics of clinics Table 3.1: Characteristics of clinics Characteristics Intervention clinics Control clinics Number of CPN (Median, 1 (0; 3.50) 1 (0; 2) laR) Number of SPN (Median, 1 ( 1; 2.25) 1.5(1;2.25) laR) Number of PN (Median, 3.5 ( 1.75; 6) 3 (2; 4) laR) All levels of PN (Median, 6.5 (5; 9.50) 6 (5; 7.25) laR) Weekly patient load 530 (428; 732) 485.5 (393; 637) (Median, laR) Number of fast lanes 4 (3;4) 3 (3;4) (Median, laR) Number with separate TB 19 (95%) 20 (100%) queue (Number, %) Number providing 24/7 4 (20%) 2 (10%) services (Number, %) IQR- Interquartile range 24fT= Operating 24 hours, 7 days a week CPN= Chief professional nurse, SPN= Senior professional nurse, PN= Professional nurse 68 Table 3.1 indicates that the staffing patterns of all levels of professional nurses for intervention and control clinics were similar at the beginning of the trial. The clinics each had median values of 6.5 and 6.0 professional nurses for intervention and control arms respectively. The intervention arm had a median of 529.5 patients weekly versus 485.5 for control, with the number of fast lanes, and number of separate tuberculosis queues all similar. 3.2.2 PALSA training sessions at intervention clinics Table 3.2 below is a summary of the number of training sessions that nurses in each intervention clinic received from PALSA trainers. Even though the intention was to conduct a minimum of 4 sessions at each clinic, nurses only received a median of 2 sessions. Some missed contact sessions due to various reasons such as being on leave, and/or attending other meetings on behalf of the clinic. Table 3.2: PALSAtraining sessions at intervention clinics Clinic Training sessions per nurse (median) Albert Luthuli 3 Bethlehem 3 Botthusong 3 BotshabeloB 1 BotshabeloU&S 1 K-Maile 2 Mphohadi 3 Namahali 2 Petrusburg 2 Phahameng 3 Phomolong 2 PAJ< 0 Riverside 2.5 Seeisoville 1 Tebang 1 Thusanong 4 Tseki 2 Tshepong 2 Tumahole 2 Welkom 3 Median number of training sessions 2 69 3.2.3 Characteristics of patients- general Table 3.3 below is a summary of numbers of patients included in the study, from the time of recruitment up to follow-up. At the end of the recruitment period, we had recruited 1000 and 999 patients for intervention and control arms, with between 47 and 52 patients per clinic. During data analysis, four more patients in each arm were deleted due to unavailability of the first post-intervention survey data and/or because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. During follow-up, both arms had an almost equal number of patients who were not followed up due to hospitalisation, being too ill to be interviewed, relocated and/or dead. Follow-up rates were 92.9% and 92.7% for intervention and control arms. Table 3.3: Number of patients included in the study Intervention Control Number of patients interviewed 1000 999 during the first post-intervention survey Analysed at first post- 996* 995* intervention Hospitalised/ilUrelocated 2 3 Lost to follow-up (no reason 47 44 provided) Deceased 22 26 Followed up 925 (92.9%) 922 (92.7%) • 4 patients in each group were excluded from analysis because they were without the first post-intervention survey data and/or did not meet inclusion criteria Table 3.4 is an illustration of the patient characteristics at the first post-intervention survey. This shows that patients in the two arms were balanced as a result of randomisation. In both arms almost two thirds were females and the most frequent age group was 25-54 years. Where discrepancies between date of births recorded at the first post-intervention survey and follow-up occurred, that is, date of birth as reflected in the patient's clinic folder number, ages were defined as missing. About 50% of patients had a smoking history, about 50% had primary education, close to 70 50% were unemployed, above 80% walked to get to the nearest clinic and 70% spent between 2 and 12 hours to travel to and from the clinic. Table 3.4: Patients' characteristics at first post-intervention survey Intervention Control Demography Gender N=996 N=995 Male 35.8% 34.1% Female 64.2% 65.9% Age N=981 N=985 15-24 8.0% 8.6% 25-54 66.2% 68.8% ~55 25.9% 22.5% Smoking history N=996 N=995 Current 16.5% 19.4% Ex-smoker 31.4% 30.2% Never smoked 52.1% 50.5% Educational background N=996 N=995 Never attended school 16.8% 15.5% Attended primary school only 46.6% 43.5% Attended secondary school 36.5% 41.0% Employment Status N=996 N=995 Employed 13.7% 18.5% Self-employed 1.9% 2.3% Unemployed 49.4% 45.3% Student/learner 2.5% 3.1% Looking for work 5.1% 6.8% Receiving Grant/pension 27.2% 23.1% Other 0.2% 0.8% Mode of transport to health facility N=996 N=995 Walk 83.4% 83.1% Bicycle 0.5% 0.9% Taxi 12.6% 10.5% Bus 0.4% 0.3% Private motor vehicle 2.9% 5.1% Other 0.2% 0.1% Time taken to travel to clinic and back N=977 N=993 Overnight 0.3% 0.0% Between 2- 12 hrs 66.5% 67.4% Less than 2 hrs 33.2% 32.6% Table 3.5 compares the patients' clinical symptoms at the first post-intervention survey. The table shows a balance between the two arms. Rates of cough and 71 difficulty breathing ranged between 70% and 90%. About 70% of the patients complained about chest symptoms interfering with their usual activities while around 36% had gone to the clinic for a check-up on recurrent respiratory problem. "Check-up" meant planned visits to the clinic, while "first visit" meant unplanned visit. The distinction between these two meanings were poorly understood by the fieldworkers during training and also by patients during interviews, hence the surprisingly high number of patients who said they had come to the clinic for a check-up for a respiratory problem and a low number of patients who had come for first visit for a respiratory problem. Table 3.5: Patients' symptoms at first post-intervention survey Intervention Control Symptoms Cough >2 weeks 78.4% (N=995) 76.5% (N=992) Cough<2weeks with respiratory rate ~ 30 2.7% (N=993) 0.6% (N=991) Cough<2 weeks with temperature ~ 38°C 0.8% (N=992) 0.7% (N=991) Phlegm/Slime 49.7% (N=881) 50.3% (N=887) Yellow/green phlegm/slime 48.1% (N=696) 52.0% (N=703) Haemoptysis 51.2% (N=881) 48.8% (N=887) Difficulty breathing today or in last 6 months 89.4% (N=995) 87.1% (N=995) Chest problems interfering with usual activities 76.5% (N=995) 70.6% (N=995) Frequency of chest problems on patient's N=760 N=702 usual activities 1- 2 times per month 3.3% 4.7% 1- 2 times per week 20.9% 25.4% Most days 75.8% 69.9% Reasons for presentation to clinic today N=995 N=989 Check-up high blood pressure 27.0% 22.7% Check-up diabetes 1.7% 2.5% Check-up respiratory problem 36.6% 36.2% Check-up other problem 9.5% 17.1% 1si visit respiratory problem 3.0% 7.1% 1si visit other problem 23.6% 23.1% 3.2.4 Characteristics of patients by sub-groups As some trial outcomes were only relevant to subgroups of patients, the first post- intervention survey characteristics of these subgroups were compared between 72 intervention and control arms. These subgroups were 1) patients with cough for more than 2 weeks and not known to have tuberculosis, 2) known tuberculosis cases,3) patients with at least one of the severity markers indicating need for referral and 4) current smokers at first post-intervention survey. Table 3.6 shows characteristics at first post-intervention survey of the subgroup of patients with cough more than 2 weeks excluding known tuberculosis cases. Table 3.6: Characteristics at first post-intervention survey of patients with cough >2 weeks and not known to have tuberculosis Intervention Control Demography Gender N=643 N=667 Male 35.2% 33.0% Female 64.9% 67.0% Age N=632 N=662 15-24 6.5% 6.5% 25-54 64.9% 67.8% ~55 28.6% 25.7% Smoking history N=643 N=667 Current 18.7% 22.6% Ex-smoker 30.8% 28.8% Never smoked 50.5% 48.6% Educational background N=643 N=667 Never attended school 18.7% 17.5% Attended primary school only 47.1% 44.7% Attended secondary school 34.2% 37.8% Employment Status N=642 N=667 Employed 13.9% 19.5% Self-employed 1.7% 2.6% Unemployed 47.4% 42.7% Studentllearner 2.3% 2.7% Looking for work 5.3% 6.6% Receiving Grant/pension 29.3% 24.9% Other 0.2% 1.1% Transport mode N=628 N=665 Walk 83.3% 81.4% Bicycle 0.6% 0.8% Taxi 11.8% 12.8% Private vehicle 3.7% 4.8% Other 0.3% 0.2% Time taken to travel to clinic and back N=626 N=665 Overnight 0.35% 0.0% Between 2-12 hrs 69.3% 68.9% Less than 2 hrs 30.4% 31.1% 73 Table 3.7 compares clinical symptoms of patients in the subgroup of patients with cough for more than 2 weeks and excluding known tuberculosis cases at first post- intervention survey. The arms were balanced. Table 3.7 Symptoms at first post-intervention survey of patients with cough >2 weeks and not known to have tuberculosis Intervention Control Symptoms Cough> 2 weeks 100% (N=643) 100% (N=667) Cough <2 weeks with respiratory rate ~ 30 0.0% (N=643) 0.0% (N=667) Cough <2 weeks with temperature ~ 38°C 0.0% (N=643) 0.0% (N=667) Phlegm/slime 48.3% (N=630) 51.7% (N=662) Yellow/green phlegm/slime 47.1% (N=496) 53.0% (530) Haemoptysis 49.7% (N=630) 50.3% (N=662) Continuous difficulty breathing problem 87.4% (N=643) 85.5% (N=667) Chest symptoms interfering with usual activities 75.1 % (N=643) 71.4% (N=667) Frequency of chest symptoms interfering with N=482 N=476 usual activities 1-2 times per month 3.1% 5.3% 1-2 times per week 22.0% 23.3% Most days 74.9% 71.4% Reasons for coming to clinic today N=642 N=665 Check-up high blood pressure 29.6% 27.1% Check-up diabetes 2.3% 3.0% Check-up respiratory problem 36.1% 35.0% Check-up other problem 9.4% 20.5% 1st visit respiratory problem 3.0% 7.2% 1st visit other problem 24.8% 22.9% Attendance to the clinic in last 3months 77.5% (N=643) 74.1% (N=667) Table 3.8 shows patient characteristics for the known tuberculosis cases subgroup at first post-intervention survey. This table also indicates similarity between the two arms at the first post-intervention survey, in terms of demography, gender, smoking history, educational background, employment status, transport mode and time taken to travel to clinic and back. What is interesting about the subgroup is that almost 60% of the patients in the sub-group have a smoking history compared 74 to 50% of all enrolled patients. There is also a balance of 50% male and female in both arms and a slight increase from 8 to 12% of the 15- 24 age group. Table 3.8: Characteristics at first post-intervention survey of patients known to have tuberculosis Intervention Control Demography Gender N=143 N=132 Male 49.7% 55.3% Female 50.6% 44.7% Age N=141 N=130 15-24 12.1% 10.0% 25-54 76.6% 81.5% 2:55 11.4% 8.5% Smoking history N=143 N=132 Current 11.2% 15.9% Ex-smoker 44.1% 43.9% Never smoked 44.8% 40.2% Educational background N=143 N=132 Never attended school 9.1% 8.3% Attended primary school only 46.2% 43.9% Attended secondary school 44.8% 47.7% Employment Status N=143 N=131 Employed 7.0% 12.2% Self-employed 2.8% 2.3% Unemployed 71.3% 64.1% Studentllearner 1.4% 3.1% Looking for work 5.6% 3.8% Receiving Grant/pension 11.9% 13.7% Other 0.0% 0.8% Transport mode N=142 N=132 Walk 83.8% 88.6% Bicycle 0.0% 3.0% Taxi 14.1% 4.6% Bus 0.0% 0.8% Private vehicle 2.1% 3.0% Time taken to travel to clinic and back N=142 N=132 Between 2- 12 hrs 46.5% 48.5% Less than 2 hrs 53.5% 51.5% Table 3.9 shows clinical symptoms for patients within the known tuberculosis cases subgroup at first post-intervention survey. The subgroup indicates a sharp increase in cough for more than 2 weeks as well as continuous difficulty breathing 75 as compared to all enrolled patients. There is also an increase in the number of patients who visit the clinic for check-up of respiratory problems in this sub-group. Table 3.9: Symptoms at first post-intervention survey of patients known to have tuberculosis Intervention Control Symptoms Cough> 2 weeks 83.2% (N=143) 84.1% (N=132) Cough <2 weeks with respiratory rate ~ .30 2.1% (N=143) 0.0% (N=132) Cough <2 weeks with temperature ~ 38°C 0.0% (N=143) 0.0% (N=131) Phlegm/slime 50.7% (N=126) 49.3% (N=116) Yellow/green phlegm/slime 46.2% (N=104 53.9% (N=101) Haemoptysis 51.9% (N=126) 48.2% (N=116) Continuous difficulty breathing problem 93.7% (N=143) 93.1% (N=132) Chest symptoms interfering with usual activities 88.8% (N=143) 80.3% (N=132) Frequency of chest symptoms interfering with N=126 N=106 usual activities 1-2 times per month 3.2% 3.8% 1-2 times per week 11.9% 31.1% Most days 84.9% 65.1% Reasons for coming to clinic today N=143 N=131 Check-up high blood pressure 8.4% 6.3% Check-up diabetes 0.0% 0.0% Check-up respiratory problem 39.9% 43.8% Check-up other problem 9.1% 7.0% 1st visit respiratory problem 0.7% 1.6% 1st visit other problem 19.6% 25.8% Attendance to the clinic in last 3 months 80.9% (N=256) 76.4% (N=165) Table 3.10 shows characteristics of the subgroup of patients with the one or more of the severity markers indicating need for urgent referral at first post-intervention survey. Even though the total number of patients whose data was analysed was . more by a 100 in the intervention arm, the percentages was the same in both arms as far as distribution of gender, age, smoking habits and other characteristics were concerned. Compared to Table 3.4, this table shows a slightly lower percentage of patients falling within the 15- 24 age group in this subgroup and a higher percentage of patients who never attended school. 76 Table 3.10: Characteristics at first post-intervention survey of patients with at least one of the 4 severity markers Intervention Control Demography Gender N=256 N=165 Male 31.3% 29.1% Female 68.8% 71.0% Age N=252 N=161 15-24 5.6% 5.6% 25-54 67.9% 67.1% ~55 26.6% 27.3% Smoking history N=256 N=165 Current 16.0% 15.2% Ex-smoker 30.9% 29.1% Never smoked 53.1% 55.8% Educational background N=256 N=165 Never attended school 23.1% 16.4% Attended primary school only 49.2% 54.6% Attended secondary school 27.7% 29.1% Employment Status N=256 N=165 Employed 11.0% 17.6% Self-employed 1.6% 1.2% Unemployed 47.3% 41.8% Student/learner 1.6% 3.0% Looking for work 3.9% 6.7% Receiving Grant/pension 34.4% 27.9% Other 0.4% 1.8% Transport mode N=251 N=165 Walk 82.9% 77.6% Bicycle 1.2% 0.0% Taxi 11.6% 13.9% Private vehicle 0.0% 0.6% Other 4.0% 7.9% Time taken to travel to clinic and back N=250 N=165 Overnight 0.8% 0.0% Between 2-12 hrs 73.2% 71.5% Less than 2 hrs 26.0% 28.5% Table 3.11 shows clinical symptoms at first post-intervention survey of patients with one or more of the severity markers. The table shows the following differences between arms in terms of symptoms. Intervention patients were more likely to report phlegm production, haemoptysis and yellow/green coloured 77 Table 3.13: Symptoms at the first post-intervention survey of current smokers Intervention Control Symptoms Cough >2 weeks 81.7% (N=164) 87.6% (N=193) Cough <2 weeks with respiratory rate ~ 30 1.8% (N=164) 0.0% (N=193) Cough <2 weeks with temperature ~ 38°C 1.2% (N=163) 0.5% (N=193) Phlegm/slime 46.5% (N=152) 53.5% (N=183) Yellow/green phlegm/slime 47.1% (N=126) 52.9% (N=146) Haemoptysis 39.6% (N=152) 60.4% (N=183) Continuous difficulty breathing problem 89.0% (N=164) 85.5% (N=193) Chest problems interfering with usual activities 78.1% (N=164) 61.7% (N=193) Frequency of chest symptoms interfering with N=127 N=119 usual activities 1-2 times per month 3.9% 5.9% 1-2 times per week 22.1% 26.1% Most days 74.1% 68.1% Reasons for coming to clinic today N=164 N=191 Check-up high blood pressure 23.2% 17.8% Check-up diabetes 0.6% 0.0% Check-up respiratory problem 26.2% 33.0% Check-up other problem 11.6% 22.0% 1si visit respiratory problem 4.3% 7.9% 1st visit other problem 22.6% 21.5% Attendance to the clinic in last 3 months 68.9% (N=164) 68.4% (N=193) 3.2.5 Reliability of tracer questions At the first post-intervention survey there were questions on difficulty breathing and cough on the day of the interview that eligible patients had to answer twice to assess test-retest reliability. Table 3.14 indicates good agreement between the repeated questions using the Kappa statistic. 80 Table 3.14: Agreement between repeated questions at first post-intervention survey Questions asked Intervention arm Control arm Kappa 95%CI Kappa 95%CI Do you have difficulty breathing 0.80 (0.75-0.84) 0.84 (0.81-0.88) (tight chest, shortness of breath, wheeze) today? Do you have a cough today? 0.87 (0.82-0.92) 0.92 (0.88-0.96) 3.2.6 Primary and secondary outcomes Table 3.15 shows the comparison of primary outcome variables between the intervention and control arms of the trial. The results are given as percentages, odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals, p values and inter-cluster correlation coefficients (ICC). The five primary outcomes that were measured were antibiotic prescription, inhaled steroid prescription, sending of sputa for tuberculosis testing, cotrimoxazole prophylaxis among patients with tuberculosis and interference with usual activities. The table shows that, in comparison to the control group, the intervention did not have any effect on antibiotic prescribing. However, there was a significant increase in inhaled steroid prescription as well as on the sending of sputa for tuberculosis testing. Compared to the control group, the intervention had no effect on prescribing of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis. or on improvement of interference with usual activities. 81 Table 3.13: Symptoms at the first post-intervention survey of current smokers Intervention Control Symptoms Cough >2 weeks 81.7% (N=164) 87.6% (N=193) Cough <2 weeks with respiratory rate ~ 30 1.8% (N=164) 0.0% (N=193) Cough <2 weeks with temperature ~ 38°C 1.2% (N=163) 0.5% (N=193) Phlegm/slime 46.5% (N=152) 53.5% (N=183) Yellow/green phlegm/slime 47.1% (N=126) 52.9% (N=146) Haemoptysis 39.6% (N=152) 60.4% (N=183) Continuous difficulty breathing problem 89.0% (N=164) 85.5% (N=193) Chest problems interfering with usual activities 78.1% (N=164) 61.7% (N=193) Frequency of chest symptoms interfering with N=127 N=119 usual activities 1-2 times per month 3.9% 5.9% 1-2 times per week 22.1% 26.1% Most days 74.1% 68.1% Reasons for coming to clinic today N=164 N=191 Check-up high blood pressure 23.2% 17.8% Check-up diabetes 0.6% 0.0% Check-up respiratory problem 26.2% 33.0% Check-up other problem 11.6% 22.0% 1st visit respiratory problem 4.3% 7.9% 1st visit other problem 22.6% 21.5% Attendance to the clinic in last 3 months 68.9% (N=164) 68.4% (N=193) 3.2.5 Reliability of tracer questions At the first post-intervention survey there were questions on difficulty breathing and cough on the day of the interview that eligible patients had to answer twice to assess test-retest reliability. Table 3.14 indicates good agreement between the repeated questions using the Kappa statistic. 80 Table 3.14: Agreement between repeated questions at first post-intervention survey Questions asked Intervention arm Control arm Kappa 95%CI Kappa 95%CI Do you have difficulty breathing 0.80 (0.75-0.84) 0.84 (0.81-0.88) (tight chest, shortness of breath, wheeze) today? Do you have a cough today? 0.87 (0.82-0.92) 0.92 (0.88-0.96) 3.2.6 Primary and secondary outcomes Table 3.15 shows the comparison of primary outcome variables between the intervention and control arms of the trial. The results are given as percentages, odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals, p values and inter-cluster correlation coefficients (ICC). The five primary outcomes that were measured were antibiotic prescription, inhaled steroid prescription, sending of sputa for tuberculosis testing, cotrimoxazole prophylaxis among patients with tuberculosis and interference with usual activities. The table shows that, in comparison to the control group, the intervention did not have any effect on antibiotic prescribing. However, there was a significant increase in inhaled steroid prescription as well as on the sending of sputa for tuberculosis testing. Compared to the control group, the intervention had no effect on prescribing of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis, or on improvement of interference with usual activities. 81 Table 3.15: Primary outcomes Intervention arm Control arm Odds Adjusted P value ICC··comes ratios 95% er- -- 1ary outcomes niN (%) nIN (%) ntibiotics prescription 360/996 36.1 378/995 38.0 0.92 (0.62-1.36) 0.68 0.102 [st post-intervention ey among all patients haled steroid 149/927 16.1 95/925 10.3 1.70 (1.13-2.56) 0.01 0.060 cription at first post- vention survey or w up among all wed up puta for TB testing at 112/669 16.7 76/680 11.2 1.60 (1.00-2.54) 0.050 0.058 post-intervention ey or follow up ng all followed up, cough> 2 weeks uding known TB ~s otrimoxazole 18/143 12.6 13/132 9.9 1.52 (0.60-3.89) 0.38 0.133 hylaxis among TB ~s rprovement of 363/923 39.3 316/922 34.3 1.25 (0.96-1.63) 0.10 0.032 rference with usual lIities from first post- rvention survey to w up among all wed up ·ConfidenceIntervals ** Intra-clustercorrelation coefficient Tables 3.16(a) and 3.16(b) show comparison of secondary outcome variables between the intervention and control arms of the trial. The results are also given as percentages, odd ratios, 95% confidence intervals, p values and inter-cluster correlation coefficients (ICC). Significant effects were seen on appropriate referral, with tuberculosis case detection rate, and admission to hospitals being close to significant. Significant adverse effects were seen on interference with usual activities due to chest problems and severity of anxiety and depression. 82 Table 3.16(a): Secondary outcomes Outcomes Intervention arm Control arm Odds Adjusted P ICC- ratio 95"10Cl· value Secondary outcomes niN ("lo) nIN ("lo) 0.0319 1. Appropriate referral (if one of 4 severity 27/255 10.6 8/165 4.9 2.56 (1.06-6.17) 0.036 marxers present) at first post-intervention survey 0.0330 2. VCCTII-UV counselling 75/925 8.1 67/922 7.3 1.13 (0_69-1.84) 0.63 3. Counselling for smoking cessation (a) Only at first post-intervention survey among 83/163 50.9 86/193 44.6 1.35 (0.92-1.98) 0.13 0.0176 current smokers at first post-intervention survey (b) First post-intervention surveyor follow-up 100/147 68.0 111/179 62.0 1_36 (0.90-2.05) 0.14 0_0034 among current smokers at first post- intervention survey 4. Increased readiness to quit smoking among 19/70 27.1 20/78 25.6 1.04 (0.5~2.05) 0.91 <0.0001 current smokers at first post-intervention survey- s. Smoking cessation at follow-up among 39/138 28.3 43/159 27.0 1.00 (0.57-1.77) 1.00 0.0645 current smokers 6. Tuberculosis case detection rate (a) Excluding known TB eases at first post- 28/925 3.0 17/922 1.8 1.67 (0.92-3.02) 0.091 0_0006 intervention survey (b) Including patients who started tuberculosis 25/996 2.5 17/995 1.7 1_48 (0_77-2.86) 0.24 0_0080 treatment Jess than 28 days before interviews started 7. Mortality rate (a) All at follow up 22/947 2.3 26/948 2.7 0.84 (0.46-1.53) 0.57 0_0048 (b) Among patients with tuberculosis at first 10/136 7.4 5/129 3.9 2.00 (0 ..51-7.75) 0.32 0.0726 post-intervention survey 8. Difliculty sleeping due to chest symptoms at 627/925 67.8 603/922 65.4 1.12 (0.89-1.41 ) 0.34 0_0322 follow-up. 9. Chest symptoms during the day at follow up 637/925 68.9 623/922 67.6 1.07 (0.81-1.40) 0.64 0.0772 10. Interference with usual activities due to 629/925 68.0 554/922 60.1 1.44 (1_1~1.85) 0.003 0.0744 chest symptoms at follow up *Confidence Intervals ** Smaller denominator because only 148 of the first-post intervention survey smokers answered both questions *** Intra--cluster correlation coefficient 83 Table 3.16(b): Secondary outcomes (continued) Outcomes Intervention ann Control ann Odds Adjusted P ICe- ratios 95%CI· value Secondary outcomes (continued) nIN ('Yo) nIN ('Yo) 11. Improvement of each domain of Ea-50 and change in the combined score at follow up a) Mobility No problem in walking about 465/923 50.4 5021922 54.5 0.84 (0.44-1.59) 0.59 0.0623 Between no problem and some problem 52/923 5.6 67/922 7.3 Some problem in walking about 364/923 39.4 330/922 35.8 Between some problem ad confined to bed 22/923 2.4 121922 1.3 Confined to bed 20/923 2.2 11/922 1.2 b) SeIf-care No problem with self-care 770/923 83.4 798/922 86.6 0.77 (0.40-1.50) 0.45 0.1129 Between no problem and some problem 28/923 3.0 36/922 3.9 Some problem washing or dressing 105/923 11.4 75/922 8.1 Between some problem and unable to wash or 7/923 0.8 5/922 0.5 dress Unable to wash or dress 13/923 1.4 8/922 0.9 c) Usual activities No problem with performing usual activities 340/923 36.8 401/922 43.5 1.18 (0.69-2.01 ) 0.55 0.0607 Between no problem and some problem 53/923 5.7 53/922 5.8 Some problem with performing usual activities 373/923 40.4 364/922 39.5 Between some problem and unable to perform 36/923 3.9 28/922 3.0 usual activities Unable to perform usual activities 121/923 13.1 76/922 8.2 d) Pain/discomfort No pain or discomfort 2561923 27.7 291/922 31.6 1.04 (0.59-1.83) 0.90 0.0846 Between none and moderate pain or discomfort 49/923 5.3 50/922 5.4 Moderate pain or discomfort 403/923 43.7 401/922 43.5 Between extreme and moderate pain or 49/923 5.3 41/922 4.5 discomfort Extreme pain or discomfort 166/923 18.0 139/922 15.1 e) Anxiety/depression No anxiety or depression ·297/923 32.2 351/922 38.1 1.66 (1.41-1.95) <0.001 0.1123 Between none and moderate anxiety or 49/923 5.3 37/922 4.0 depression Moderate anxiety or depression 290/923 31.4 279/922 30.3 Between extreme and moderate anxiety or 38/923 4.1 30/922 3.3 depression Extreme anxiety or depression 249/923 27.0 224/922 24.3 Change in the combined EQ-5D score Mean (SO) 0.10 (0.44) 0.12 (0.41) -0.03 (-0.08-0.03) 0.37 0.0367 12. Number of visits to other health care providers between the first post-intervention survey and follow up (a)Median (laR) 2 (1-3) 2 (1-3) 1.19 (0.82-1.72) 0.37 0.0984 (b)Mean (SO) 2.0 (1.5) 1.8 (1.4) 1.19 (0.82-1.72) 0.37 0.0984 13. Admissions to hospitals between the first 26/925 2.8 41/922 4.5 0.62 (0.38-1.02) 0.062 0.0023 post-intervention surve}' and follow up IOR= Interquartile range, SD- Standard deviation, ·Confidence Intervals - Intra-cluster correlation coefficient· 84 Since first post-intervention survey differences were observed between the two groups when analysing patients with indicators of severe illness requiring referral (secondary outcome 1), haemoptysis, phlegm and sputum colour were added as explanatory variables in the regression model. The adjusted odds ratio was 2.54 (95% Cl 1.01 to 6.38) and p-value 0.047. This shows that the first post-intervention survey adjustment did not influence the estimated effect. First post-intervention survey differences were also observed between the two groups when analysing patients with difficulty sleeping due to chest problems, (secondary outcome 8), patients with chest symptoms during the day (secondary outcome 9), and patients with interference with usual activities due to chest symptoms (secondary outcome 10). The first post-intervention survey adjustment was therefore done for all the three outcomes. For difficulty sleeping due to chest problems, the adjusted odds ratio was 1.12 (95% Cl 0.89 to 1.41), for chest symptoms during the day the adjusted odds ratio was 1.07 (95% Cl 0.81 to 1.40), and for interference with usual activities due to chest symptoms the adjusted odds ratio was 1.44 (95% Cl 1.13 to 1.85). This also implies that the first post- intervention survey adjustment did not influence the estimated effect. Ordinal logistic regressions of the EuroOol-5D sub-domains were done adjusting for the first post-intervention survey values of the same variables. Stata output warned that the resulting standard errors were questionable, so these results should be interpreted with caution. However comparison of anxiety and depression at follow-up using Cusick's non-parametric test for trend, but not adjusting for cluster effects or the first post-intervention survey values, also found this to be significantly worse in the intervention arm (p value=0.03) For change in the combined EO-5D score, the coefficient (and 95% confidence interval) are difference in score instead of odds ratios. The change in score is normally distributed, so linear regression is an appropriate method of comparison. 85 3.2.7 Number needed to treat calculations Table 3.17 below is an illustration of numbers needed to treat in order to see the effects of the study. As indicated, eighteen patients would need to be seen by a PALSA trained nurse for one extra patient to be prescribed an inhaled steroid. Seventeen patients would need to be seen by a PALSA trained nurse for one extra appropriate referral to be made. Other differences were not significant (95% confidence intervals include 0) Table 3.17: Number needed to treat (NNT) Outcomes RD (95% Cl) Number needed to (95% Cl) treat (NNT)= 1/RD 1. Inhaled steroid 0.055 (0.017; 0.094) 18 11; 59 prescription 2. Sputa sent for TB 0.44 (-0.004; 0.89) 2.3 -250; 1.1 testing 3. Appropriate 0.058 (0.008; 0.11) 17 9.1; 125 referral 4. TB case detection 0.011 (-0.002; 0.025) 91 -500; 40 rate 5. Hospital -0.015 (-0.030; -0.001) -67 -33; 1000 admissions 86 CHAPTER 4- DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION 4.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter will discuss the results of the study. Strengths and limitations of the study will follow, as well as implications for policy. Finally, a conclusion about the study will be given. 4.2 OVERVIEW OF RE5UL T5 The results of the study show that the PALSA intervention led to a significant improvement on inhaled steroid prescription, with a prescription rate of 16.1% in the intervention arm compared to 10.3% in the control arm (odds ratio 1.70; 95%CI 1.13 to 2.56), and a marginally significant improvement in sending of sputa for tuberculosis testing, with 16.1% in the intervention arm compared to 11.0% in the control arm (odds ratio 1.60; 95%CI 1.00 to 2.54). There were also significantly higher probabilities of appropriate referral of patients that had one of the four severity markers at first post-intervention survey, that is, 10.6% for intervention compared to 4.9% for the control arm (odds ratio 2.56; 95%CI1.06 to 6.17); and of interference with usual activities due to chest symptoms at follow-up of 68.0% for intervention and 60.1% for control arms (odds ratio 1.44; 95%CI 1.13 t01.85). A close to significant difference was found in the tuberculosis case detection rate, 3.0% for intervention compared to 1.8% for control arm (odds ratio 1.67; 95%CI 0.92 to 3.02). All but one of these outcomes was improvements in health care processes rather than in patients' health status. It is however reasonable to predict, based on previous research, that earlier tuberculosis treatment and increased asthma preventive therapy would lead to improved health status in patients with these conditions, although it would take longer than three months for health gains to be detected (Borgdorff et a/2002, Griffiths et a/2004). The marked improvement in inhaler prescribing could have been due to the permission that was granted by the provincial health department authorities to nursing practitioners in intervention clinics to prescribe inhalers during the study rather than to the 87 intervention itself. This permission was part of the intervention package, and so its effects cannot be distinguished from the educational components. There was no significant effect of the intervention on 3 of the 5 primary outcomes of the study, these being reduction of antibiotic prescription, increase in cotrimoxazole prophylaxis among known tuberculosis patients, and improvement of interference with usual activities due to chest symptoms. The latter primary outcome (improvement of interference with usual activities) was the difference between interference after three months and at first post-intervention survey, in contrast to the secondary outcome reported in the previous paragraph, which did not account for interference at first post-intervention survey. One plausible explanation for the lack of effect on cotrimoxazole prescribing was that during the course of the study, the province had an interruption of the supply of cotrimoxazole, even though the province had adopted a policy on cotrimoxazole prophylaxis that had been budgeted for. Numbers needed to treat provide an estimate of absolute, rather than relative effectiveness. As illustrated in Table 3.17, only 2.3 patients with chronic cough and without known tuberculosis would need to be managed by a PALSA-trained nurse for one more such patient to have sputum sent for testing (95%CI-250 to 1.1),18 patients would need to be managed by a PALSA-trained nurse for one more patient to be prescribed inhaled steroids (95%CI 11 to 59), and 17 patients with signs indicating severe disease would need to be managed by a PALSA-trained nurse for one more patient to be referred to a doctor or hospital (95%CI9.1 t0125). Given the large numbers of such patients managed every day in Free State clinics, and the capacity of such patients to benefit from such care; these appear to be substantial effects. The screening questions about cough and difficulty breathing were broad and could include patients with heart problems and not necessarily respiratory problems. For example, high percentages of patients reported that they were 88 attending the clinic for hypertension. These questions were possibly overly sensitive in the screening context, and thus lack specificity for conditions that are the target for intervention. The guidelines and medication for respiratory conditions would not be expected to benefit heart disease patients. The inclusion of such patients in the study could have thus led to an underestimation of the effect of the intervention on respiratory patients alone. This also raises the cost of implementing the intervention. The results also showed an extraordinarily high prevalence of certain respiratory symptoms, especially since only about 40 percent of patients were attending for respiratory problems. This is seen on Table 3.5, where in the intervention group persistent cough accounted for 78%, troublesome respiratory symptoms accounted for 76% of which 76% were daily, and haemoptysis accounted for 51%. The proportion of ex-smokers (31%) was also surprisingly high, especially as two thirds of the attendees were women. This might reflect medical advice given to patients with respiratory symptoms, which would suggest a highly effective prior smoking cessation practices in the clinics. Steyn and colleagues determined smoking patterns in South Africa, and identified groups requiring culturally appropriate smoking cessation programmes by conducting interviews of a random sample of 13 826 people (> 15 years to identify tobacco use patterns and respiratory symptoms as part of the 1998 South African demographic health survey (Steyn et a/2002). Results of the study showed that adults (44.2% of males and 11.0% of females) smoked regularly. About 24% of the regular smokers had attempted to quit, with only 9.9% succeeding. The researchers came to the conclusion that smoking in South Africa is decreasing and should continue with the recently passed tobacco control legislation (Steyn et al 2002). Culturally appropriate tobacco cessation programmes for the identified target groups need to be developed (Steyn et a/2002). 89 The primary outcomes that were not significantly different were antibiotic prescription, cotrimoxazole prophylaxis and interference with usual activities. This could either be due to no true effect, or due to the study having insufficient power to detect a significant difference. Estimations from the pilot study were worked out to reduce antibiotic prescription by 10%, with 90% power at the 5% significance level. It however turned out that the intervention had no significant effect on antibiotic prescription, 36% versus 38% for intervention and control arms (odds ratio 0.92; 95%CI 0.62 t01.36). The present study only had 14% power to find such a small difference significant at the 5% level, ignoring the reduced power due to cluster randomization. A 2% difference in antibiotic prescribing would in any case be of questionable clinical significance. Similarly, the study had only 7.4% power to detect a true difference in cotrimoxazole prophylaxis in patients with tuberculosis of the magnitude found (12.6% versus 9.9% for intervention and control groups), ignoring the cluster randomization design effect. 4.3 COMPARISON OF THESE RESULTS WITH RESULTS OF PREVIOUS TRIALS The results of this study will now be compared with those of similar trials of interventions aimed to improve diagnosis or treatment of respiratory diseases in primary care. 4.3.1 Antibiotic prescribing Several studies have been conducted to assess the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing antibiotic prescribing for respiratory conditions at primary care level. In one trial, Welschen and colleagues conducted a randomized controlled trial in The Netherlands to assess the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention aimed at reducing antibiotic prescription rates for symptoms of the respiratory tract among general practitioners in primary care (Weischen et al 2004). The 90 intervention comprised group education meetings for the practitioners, monitoring and feedback on prescribing behaviour, group education for assistants of general practitioners and pharmacists, and education materials for patients. The control group did not receive any of these elements. From 89 general practitioners who completed the 9 months study, there was a difference in the prescription rate of - 12% (95% CI-18.9% to -4.0%) between the intervention and control groups. There was also high patient satisfaction which did not differ between the two arms (Weischen et a/2004). In another trial on antibiotic prescription, Zwar and colleagues conducted a randomized controlled trial in a community setting in New South Wales to examine the effectiveness of prescriber feedback and management guidelines in reducing antibiotic prescribing for undifferentiated upper respiratory tract infection by general practice trainees, and in improving the choice of antibiotic for tonsillitis/streptococcal pharyngitis (Zwar et a/1999). Of the 157 trainees enrolled for the trial, 78 were randomly allocated to the intervention while 79 were assigned to the control arm. The trainees completed three practice activity surveys, each of 110 consecutive patient encounters, with 6-month intervals between surveys. Prescriber feedback and management guidelines on use of antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infection and choice of antibiotic for tonsillitis/streptococcal pharyngitis were delivered in a written form between surveys 1 and 2. An educational outreach visit to high prescribers occurred between surveys 2 and 3. Outcome measures were the rate of antibiotic prescribing for all indications, for upper respiratory tract infection and prescribing of select antibiotics for tonsillitis/streptococcal pharyngitis (Zwar et a/1999). Results of the study showed a decline in antibiotic prescribing by the intervention group over three occasions from 25.0 to 23.3 to 19.7 per 100 upper respiratory tract infection problems, while the control group increased from 22.0 to 25.0 to 31.7 per 100 upper respiratory tract infection problems (p=0.002). Prescribing in agreement with accepted guidelines for tonsillitis/streptococcal pharyngitis increased over time in the intervention group from 55.6 to 69.8 to 73.0 per 100 problems, but decreased in 91 the control group from 59.6 to 57.5 to 58.5 (p=O.05) (Zwar et a/1999). Even though this study was conducted in a developed country as compared to our study which was conducted in a developing country, the study provides a model for targeting educational input to those prescribers who are in most need to change their behavior in prescribing antibiotics. The above two cited studies were conducted in developed countries and both targeted medical doctors as compared to our study that was conducted in a developing country and targeted primary care clinic nurses. Results of our study were not consistent with these two studies in that the effect of reduction in antibiotic prescription as a result of outreach training of primary care practitioners was not significant (p=O.68).. 4.3.2 Asthma treatment and management 4.3.2.1 General practitioners' knowledge about diagnosis and treatment of asthma Tomson and colleagues conducted a study to assess the effect of an intervention on general practitioners' knowledge about the diagnosis and treatment of asthma, including the prescribing of anti-asthmatic drugs, and asthmatic patients' knowledge about their disease in Sweden (Tomson et a/1997). In the intervention area, 44 general practitioners at 21 health centres were visited by a clinical pharmacologist and a pharmacist presenting oral and written information. The basic messages were: (1) the central role of inhaled glucocorticoids; (2) the use of peak expiratory flow (PEF) meters; and (3) the use of reversibility tests. In the control area, there were 19 general practitioners at nine health centres. The general practitioners' knowledge about the intervention message was evaluated by a questionnaire pre- and post-intervention. The ratios of prescribed inhaled beta- adrenoceptor agonists to inhaled glucocorticoids were determined. At the 26 local 92 pharmacies, all asthmatic patients who presented a prescription for anti-asthmatic drugs, issued at the 30 trial health centres, were given a questionnaire before and after the intervention regarding their knowledge of asthma and its treatment. Results of the trial showed that general practitioners in the intervention area showed significantly more knowledge about item numbers 2 and 3 in the above- described intervention message than did the general practitioners in the control area. The data on prescriptions showed lower but not significant ratios of beta- adrenoceptor agonists to glucocorticoids in the intervention area than in the control area. After the general practitioners' intervention, the patients' knowledge about asthma had increased in the intervention area, as assessed by the questionnaire filled in by the patients. However, there was no significant difference from that in the control area. The authors found changes in knowledge, attitudes and actual practice, the latter being measured by the prescriptions (Tomson et a/1997). The difference between our study and the above cited trial is that our study was conducted in a developing country and it targeted nursing practitioners while this one was conducted in a developed country and targeted doctors. Our study shows that in place of general practitioners, if properly trained and supported, clinic nursing practitioners can equally improve adult asthma management at primary care level. 4.3.2.2 Asthma specialist nurses Griffiths and colleagues conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial to determine whether asthma specialist nurses, using a liaison model of care, reduce unscheduled care in a deprived multiethnic area in london (Griffiths et a/ 2004). The study involved 44 general practices in which 324 people aged 4 to 60 years were admitted to or were attending hospital or the general practitioner out of hour service with acute asthma. The intervention comprised of patient review in a nurse led clinic and liaison with general practitioners and practice nurses comprising educational outreach, promotion of guidelines for high risk asthma, and ongoing clinical support. Control practices only received a visit promoting standard asthma 93 guidelines, and control patients were checked for inhaler technique. The main outcome measures were percentage of participants receiving unscheduled care for acute asthma over one year and time to the first unscheduled attendance. Primary outcome data were available for 319 of 324 (98%) participants. Intervention delayed time to first attendance with acute asthma (hazard ratio 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.54 to 1.00; median 194 days for intervention and 126 days for control) and reduced the percentage of participants attending with acute asthma (58% (101/174) v 68% (99/145); odds ratio 0.62; 95% confidence interval 0.38 to 1.01). In analyses of specified subgroups the difference in effect on ethnic groups was not significant, but results were consistent with greater benefit for white patients than for South Asian patients or those from other ethnic groups. The results of the study showed that asthma specialist nurses using a liaison model of care reduced unscheduled care for asthma in a deprived multiethnic health district (Griffiths et aI2004). The above cited study differed from ours in that it was conducted in a developed country and at secondary care level. Our study's results were however consistent with the cited trial in showing that training nurses on asthma management can produce significant results in improving asthma management. However, nurses in the cited trial received two one hour visits by specialist nurses compared to our study where nurses received a median of two half an hour visits, adding up to only one hour. 4.3.2.3 Asthma patient education Premaratne and colleagues conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of an asthma resource centre in improving treatment and quality of life for asthmatic patients aged 15-50 years in 41 general practices in Greenwich with a practice nurse (Premaratne et al 2000). The intervention comprised a nurse specialist in asthma who educated and supported practice nurses, who in turn educated patients in the management of asthma according to the British Thoracic Society's guidelines. Outcome measures were quality of life of 94 asthmatic patients, attendance at accident and emergency departments, admissions to local hospitals, and steroid prescribing by general practitioners. Of 24 400 patients randomly selected and surveyed in 1993, 12 238 replied; 1621 were asthmatic of whom 1291 were sent a repeat questionnaire in 1996 and 780 replied. Of 24 400 patients newly surveyed in 1996, 10 783 (1616 asthmatic) replied. No evidence was found for an improvement in asthma related quality of life among newly surveyed patients in intervention practices compared with control practices. Neither was there evidence of an improvement in other measures of the quality of asthma care. Weak evidence was found for an improvement in quality of life in intervention practices among asthmatics registered with study practices in 1993 and followed up in 1996. Neither attendances at accident and emergency departments nor admissions for asthma showed any tendency to diverge in intervention and control practices over the study period. Steroid prescribing rates rose steadily during the study period. The average annual increase in steroid prescribing was 3% per year higher in intervention than control practices (95% confidence interval-1% to 6%, P=0.10). The authors came to the conclusion that this model of service delivery is not effective in improving the outcome of asthma in the community (Premaratne et a/2000). Further development is required if cost effective management of asthma is to be introduced. Smeele and colleagues conducted a randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of an intensive small group education and peer review programme aimed at implementing national guidelines on asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on care provision by general practitioners and on patient outcomes (Smeele et a/1999). This was a study with pre-measurement and post- measurement (after one year) in an experimental group and a control group in Dutch general practice. The education and peer review group (17 general practitioners with 210 patients) had an intervention consisting of an interactive group education and peer review programme (four sessions each lasting two hours). The control group consisted of 17 general practitioners with 223 patients (no intervention). The effectiveness of the intervention was measured by 95 knowledge, skills, opinion about asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease care, presence of equipment in practice; actual performance of peak-flow measurement, non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment; asthma symptoms according to the Dutch Medical Research Council guidelines, smoking habits, exacerbation ratio, and disease specific quality of life (QOl-RIQ). Data were collected by a written questionnaire for general practitioners, by self recording of consultations by general practitioners, and by a written self administered questionnaire for adult patients with asthmalCOPD. Data from 34 general practitioners questionnaires, 433 patient questionnaires, and recordings from 934 consultations/visits and 350 repeat prescriptions were available. Compared with the control group there were only significant changes for self estimated skills (+16%, 95% confidence interval4% to 26%) and presence of peak flow meters in practice (+18%, p < 0.05). No significant changes were found for provided care and patient outcomes compared with the control group. In the subgroup of more severe patients, the group of older patients, and in the group of patients not using anti-inflammatory medication at the first post-intervention survey, no significant changes compared with the control group were seen in patient outcomes. Except for two aspects, intensive small group education and peer review in asthma and COPD care do not seem to be effective in changing relevant aspects of the provided care by general practitioners in accordance with guidelines, nor in changing patients' health status. Our study differed from the above two studies in that instead of looking at specialized facilities such as asthma centres and intensive small groups education programmes, we used a team of specially trained nurses to train primary care clinic nurses on respiratory conditions in general. Our study also slightly differed from the above two cited studies in that we investigated the effectiveness of a locally adapted set of guidelines that addressed respiratory care at primary care level instead of a national set of guidelines. An addition that our study brings into the respiratory care field is to show that localization of internationally developed 96 set of guidelines that addresses respiratory conditions of public health importance can be effective in rural primary care settings. 4.3.3 Cotrimoxazole prophylaxis Several studies have been conducted to establish the effects of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis on known tuberculosis cases. In one study, Mwaungulu and colleagues conducted a cohort study to estimate the effect of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis on the survival of HIV-positive tuberculosis patients in Malawi between 1999 and 2000 (Mwaungulu et a/2004). Of the 355 and 362 tuberculosis patients registered in 1999 and 2000 respectively, 70% were HIV-positive. The overall case fatality rate fell from 37% to 29%, meaning that, for every 12.5 tuberculosis patients treated, one death was averted. Case fatality was unchanged in HIV- negative patients, but fell in HIV-positive patients from 43% to 24% in the 2 years. The improvement was most marked in patients with smear-positive tuberculosis and others with confirmed tuberculosis diagnosis. The researchers concluded that survival of HIV-positive tuberculosis patients improved dramatically with the addition of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis to the treatment regimen (Mwaungulu et al 2004). Our study tried to establish if the intervention increased prescribing of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis. There is still a need for further research in this area under conditions when cotrimoxazole is available. Brou and colleagues conducted a survey in Cote d'lvoire, Africa, among healthcare providers, on the knowledge of prophylactic use of cotrimoxazole to prevent opportunistic infections in HIV-infected persons (Brou et a/ 2003). The survey was conducted in 15 health centres, involved or not in the 'initiative of access to treatment for HIV infected people'. Between December 1999 and March 2000, 145 physicians and 297 other health care providers were interviewed. In the analysis, the health centres were divided into three groups: health centres implicated in the initiative of access to treatment for HIV-infected people with a great deal of caring for HIV-infected people, health centres implicated in this 97 initiative but caring for few HIV-infected people, and health centres not specifically involved in the care of HIV-infected people. Six per cent of physicians and 50% of other health care providers had never heard of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis. The level of information about this prophylaxis is related to the level of HIV-related activities in the health centre. Among health care providers informed, knowledge on the exact terms of prescription of the cotrimoxazole was poor. The authors came to the conclusion that the recommendations for primary cotrimoxazole prophylaxis of HIV-infected people did not reach the whole health care provider population. Most physicians are informed but not other health workers, even if the latter were often the only contact of the patient with the health centre. The only medical staff correctly informed were the physicians already strongly engaged in the care of HIV-infected people (Brou et a/2003). The similarity between our study and the above two cited studies are that they were all conducted in developing countries and in primary care settings. Even though our study was not meant to establish the knowledge level of health care providers on cotrimoxazole prophylaxis, its implementation could be translated into level of awareness among health care providers. Even though affected by the provincial stock out of cotrimoxazole during the course of the trial, the fact that the intervention had no effect is a cause for concern. 4.4 STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS 4.4.1 Strengths of the study The study recruited a total of 1991 patients, 996 for intervention and 995 for control arms. This was a large sample that provided adequate power to detect fairly small differences between the two arms, even taking into account the cluster randomization. The randomization succeeded in balancing the characteristics of the clinics as well as the patients at the first post-intervention survey. In almost all the subgroup 98 analyses, the first post-intervention survey characteristics of patients of the two groups were balanced. The fact that the PALSA project was implemented at clinic level ensured that contamination was minimized. Unlike studies that randomize individual participants and not clusters, our study randomized participants attending a given clinic. This resulted in no participants from the control arm being seen by a PALSA trained nurse from the intervention arm. The clinic follow-up rate was complete, that is, follow-up interviews were conducted in all 40 clinics and the patient follow-up rate of 92.8% was high, thus enhancing the internal validity of the study. The high follow-up rate can be attributed to the food parcel incentive, as well as the diligence of the fieldworkers, clear instructions on how to arrange a follow-up interview, and what to do during emergency situations such as when a patient does not show up for an interview. In cases where logistical problems were encountered innovative corrective measures were taken. An example of this innovation was during follow-up interviews in one of the control clinics, Marakong, where due to miscommunication on dates for follow-up interviews, field workers gave patients wrong dates for coming back. When reminded about the follow-up dates by the PALSA researchers, last minute preparations had to be done in order to prepare for field work at the clinic. In order to inform and request patients to come for interviews at the clinic that week, field workers sought assistance from local authorities to inform patients about the interview dates and a local radio station was used for informing patients who were due for follow-up interviews to report themselves at the clinic during that week. Even though the overall follow-up rate for that clinic ended up being 80%, which was below the average 92.8%, this reflected dedication and diligence by the field workers on the project. The Centre for Health Systems Research and Development, University of the Free State coordinated the data collection process. The Centre has conducted national 99 and provincial studies of different magnitudes, all of which reflect a wealth of experience. It is this wealth of experience that has contributed to the success in attaining high follow-up rate. The use of the personal digital assistant (PDA) could have also contributed significantly to the high follow-up rate due to the fact that it was a new method of data collection which fascinated the relatively young interviewers, compared to the traditionally used paper questionnaire, which can be unappealing due to size. It also became apparent during the study that some patients felt more confident of the PDA's confidentiality in that the information they were providing could not be easily retrieved or seen once entered into the computer-like device compared to a paper questionnaire that one can look at anytime. The success of using the PDAs in this study shows that such technology can be applied in health facility settings. Use of the visual aid as part of the data collection tools assisted patients to easily identify and therefore give correct responses to questions relating to medication normally used or prescribed on the day of interview. The blinding of clinic staff and field workers contributed significantly to the internal validity of the study. The study population was intended to be as broadly defined as possible, so as to include all patients who might benefit from the intervention. That is, it included all adults with difficult breathing or with cough of more than one week because it was believed that any such patients could potentially benefit, regardless of their reason for arriving there. Even patients who attended a clinic for another reason, for example, for treatment of a rash, hypertension or an injury, would be at higher risk than the general population having a respiratory illness such as tuberculosis or asthma and so could potentially benefit from appropriate diagnosis and treatment. 100 4.4.2 Limitations of the study The study's results can be generalized to a wide range of primary care patients since broad inclusion criteria were used. This, however, has drawbacks as well. Patients who were recruited to the trial according to the inclusion criteria were diverse as shown by the reasons for presenting to the clinic on the day of the interview. These included check-up for chronic diseases such as diabetes and high blood pressure as well as check-up for respiratory diseases. Other patients indicated that this was their first visit for the above illnesses. According to Table 3.5, which shows patients' symptoms at the first post intervention survey, more than 20% of the patients presented with high blood pressure, implying that these patients were a mix of patients with cough and difficulty breathing problems. This posed a problem of defining appropriate denominators of populations during the analysis process. To address this problem, apart from the analyses being done on all patients at the first post intervention survey and all patients followed up, participants were divided into four subgroups, these being,1) patients with cough for more than 2 weeks and not known to have tuberculosis, 2) known tuberculosis cases, 3) patients with at least one of the severity markers and 4) current smokers at the first post intervention survey. In order for the analysis to be as inclusive as possible and to be by intention to treat, all subjects were included in the comparisons of outcomes unless it was illogical to do so. But if subgroups of patients could not possibly achieve particular outcomes, they were excluded from the particular comparisons. For example, patients currently being treated for tuberculosis could not possibly be newly diagnosed as having tuberculosis, and non-smoking patients could not possibly quit smoking. Although it would have been possible to identify subgroups of patients who would be more likely to benefit from particular diagnoses or treatments, for example, a subgroup of patients whose symptoms indicted that they were at higher risk of having asthma and could have been analyzed to compare asthma-related outcomes. This higher probability does not equate with logical entailment. Therefore the latter types of subgroup analyses were not performed. Since randomization was done not at the level of these subgroups, the subgroups could have been unbalanced, but as discussed 101 before within subgroups intervention and control patients usually did not differ with regard to measured first post-intervention survey characteristics. Staff movement in the form of transfers and resignation is common in the public health sector. Such staff movement usually reduces the magnitude of effects of an intervention. Chief nursing officers in the control clinics were contacted to establish if any of trained nurses from the intervention clinics were transferred to the control clinics during the project period. Responses were that none were transferred to their clinics. This means that there was no contamination caused by staff movement as a result of transfers. Follow-up interviews were conducted within a short space of time three months after the first post-intervention survey which is four months after the training had taken place. Therefore long term effects on health outcomes, especially effects on chronic diseases could not be adequately determined. The fact that the training targets were not met, with most intervention clinics nurses having received half of what was required, that is, one hour only could have affected the results of the trial and sustainability of the intervention. Although PALSA trainers were cautioned not to inform intervention clinic nurses that they were going to be evaluated, clinic nurses may have anticipated being evaluated, which could have influenced their practice. This was a cluster randomized trial with a primary care clinic being a unit of randomization. This design reduces the power to detect the effect of an exposure as compared to trials involving individuals. This project had many stakeholders with a broad expertise base. Contributions to development of data collection tools were diverse with different expectations and this sometimes resulted in omission of relevant questions or erroneous question formulation in the questionnaires. For example, the follow-up questionnaire did not 102 ask whether patients had received any preventer inhaler(s) in the last 3 months (since the first interview). The questions tried only to establish if the patient had received an inhaler on the day of the interview or was currently using an inhaler. To ensure that adequate numbers of patients would be recruited, the study was conducted in the province's largest and busiest clinics with heavy daily patient loads. Our study was not designed in such a way that it compared the intensity of effects of the intervention on different sizes of clinics, that is, variation between large, medium and small sized clinics. In a randomized controlled trial conducted by Freemantie and colleagues to estimate the effectiveness of educational outreach visits on United Kingdom (UK) general practice prescribing and to examine the extent to which practice characteristics influenced outcome, the authors established that in large practices, educational outreach alone is unlikely to achieve worthwhile change. The authors concluded that there is good evidence to support the use of educational outreach visits in small practices (Freemantie 2002). The pilot study helped with questionnaire and study design but was misleading in some respects. The pilot study indicated higher percentages of antibiotic prescription and interference with usual activities and a lower percentage of inhaled steroid prescriptions than those found in the trial. In the pilot study the percentages were 70%, 17% and 50% for antibiotics prescription, inhaled steroid prescription and interference with usual activities respectively. In order to decrease the percentages of antibiotic prescription and interference with usual activities and increase inhaled steroids prescription each by 10% with 90% power it was estimated that we would require a sample size of 2000 participants for the study, that is, 1000 per arm. Results of the study however showed a prevalence of 38%, 10.3% and 34.3% for these three outcomes in the control group. These large differences imply that the pilot study was conducted on patients who were more severely ill than patients in the trial. 103 4.5 IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY Differences of 5.8% in inhaled steroid prescription, of 5.5% in sending of sputa for tuberculosis testing, and 5.7% for appropriate referral are large enough improvements to be worth considering in policy formulation. That is, for every 20 eligible patients managed using PALSA methods, management of about one extra patient would be improved in each of these ways. The fact that these effects were obtained within a 3 months period suggests that even better results may have been obtained had the duration of the study been longer. Positive effects of the study do give an indication that such an intervention can be considered as a training strategy for clinic nurses who provide services in settings such as this South African province, however due consideration must be given to the associated costs of other equally important competing priorities in the settings. The intervention was developed internationally, and it was tested to establish if it can be implemented in developing countries. Because the study was done in a resource-poor province of the country, it is possible to generalize its results to similar low income settings. It would therefore be beneficial to implement PALSA training in addition to or as part of the primary care nurse training. There are 238 primary care clinics that provide services to a population of about 2.4 million people in the Free State and if the PALSA project were to be rolled out to cover the whole province, thousands of people would benefit from an improvement in inhaled steroid prescription and tuberculosis case detection rate. Implementation of this PALSA training could be done in phases in order to ensure smooth adaptation and accommodation of limited resources. This could be started first at provincial level, then proceed to national implementation and hopefully at international level. The intervention may need to be adapted for different provinces or countries. The cost effectiveness of this intervention needs to be considered. A cost effective analysis of the intervention is currently being conducted alongside the trial by one 104 of the PALSA researchers, Dr. Lara Fairall. A large portion of the first post- intervention survey and follow-up questionnaires comprised questions about cost implication of respiratory care to patients and the health sector. However, this was a relatively low cost intervention, especially as it required clinic staff to spend relatively little time away from their patients. The training was conducted by public officials and not private trainers, and took place inside clinics compared to the normal conduct of training outside clinic premises. The intervention utilized public resources in the form of officials, transport and venues for conducting trainings. Much of the cost was incurred in the development of training materials and methods. Providing these on a larger scale as a result of expansion provincially and nationally would have relatively low marginal costs. Reasons why PALSA achieved some objectives and not others should be further investigated. One of the conditions set by the principal funding agency of the project, the International Development Research Centre (IDRC), was that the researchers had be able after conducting the trial to account for why some objectives were met and not others. A qualitative researcher is currently analyzing qualitative data showing different levels of acceptance and implementation by nursing staff in the intervention clinics. This data was collected prior and post implementation of the intervention. Results of the qualitative research will assist in explaining the perception of the clinic staff about the intervention and why some objectives and not others could not be achieved. These results could be used to improve the intervention. In resource poor settings, health care is provided by nurses instead of doctors (Green et al 2001). Nurses normally lack adequate skills and knowledge to make right decisions especially on respiratory conditions. They end up either delaying to refer severe conditions on time or misdiagnose respiratory disease, both resulting in heavy financial burden to governments and families. Increase in appropriate referrals by clinic nurses to specialists in higher levels of the service is highly recommended as expressed in most guidelines (Lalloo et al 2000). Increase in 105 appropriate referral of patients result in reduction in morbidity and mortality. PALSA type of primary care training could be considered for other conditions than respiratory conditions. Currently, this concept has been extended to implementation of PALSA Plus which forms part of the antiretroviral drugs (ARV) roll-out in the Free State. PALSA Plus is also being evaluated by a randomized controlled trial and qualitative research. As with the integrated management of childhood illnesses (IMCI), sexually transmitted diseases care and tuberculosis/HIV, the syndromic management of diseases of public health importance in poor resourced countries continues to be a promising approach to training multipurpose primary care workers. 4.6 PRIORITIES FOR FUTURE RESEARCH Results of the evaluation are to be disseminated to stakeholders throughout the province, mainly district health management teams comprising managers, CEOs, clinic managers, district tuberculosis coordinators and other relevant role players during this year. Upon approval of the reports and intention to roll-out the intervention, first, to the control clinics and then the entire province, it will be important to conduct observational studies of the large scale roll-out of the PALSA project itself. It is important for decision and policy makers to understand why certain interventions work and why others do not. Information can be obtained by conducting qualitative research alongside quantitative studies. Qualitative research was conducted alongside the randomized controlled trial by one of the PALSA team members. It will be important for findings of the qualitative study to be shared with Free State authorities for decision making purposes about the fate of PALSA. This will provide insights into the human and organizational aspects of the intervention and the setting, which will help to explain why various effects were or were not found, and how the intervention could be improved in future. 106 Future trials need to be conducted for similar interventions for different conditions. An example is the PALSA Plus trial currently ongoing in the Free State province related to the roll-out of antiretroviral drugs. The Practical Approach to Lung Health project {PAL} is currently being implemented in three countries but using different approaches, namely, Nepal, Morocco and Brazil. Nepal, which is also a developing country like South Africa decided to implement PAL through a trial approach to establish its effectiveness prior to national implementation. Results of the trial will be peer reviewed and the intervention will be adapted by the relevant authorities on the basis of results obtained. A WHO PAL Advisory committee with membership from all the implementing countries is scheduled to hold biannual progress report meetings from which individual countries will learn from each others' reports and therefore amend its own project accordingly. 4.7 CONCLUSION This study exemplifies an evaluation of the effectiveness of an educational intervention in South African primary care. It shows how a carefully developed intervention, using a syndromic approach to diagnosis and treatment, can improve several aspects of clinical care after brief training of primary care nurses. It also illustrates opportunities for, and difficulties in, implementing such an intervention, and conducting a large scale trial in this setting. This study suggests that other international interventions based on dissemination of clinical guidelines - such as for IMCI, STDs and HIV/AIDS - should be carefully developed and rigorously evaluated locally, given their potential impact on public health and on services. 107 REFERENCES Adams N, Bestall JM, Jones PW. Inhaled beclomethasone versus placebo for chronic asthma. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2004. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd . Ait-Khaled N, Enarson D, Boustquet J. Chronic respiratory diseases in developing countries: the burden and strategies for prevention and management. Bulletin of the World Hea/th Organisation 2001; 79: 971-979. Arrol! B, Kenealy T. Antibiotics for common cold and acute purulent rhinitis. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2004. Chichester: Software update. Ballard R C, Fehler H G, Htun Y, Radebe F, Jensen J S et al. Coexistence of urethritis with general ulcer disease in South Africa. Influence on provision of syndromic management. Sex Transm /nf2002;78: 274-277. Bamford L, Loveday M, Verkuiji S. Tuberculosis. In: Ijumba P, Day C, Ntuli A, editors. South African Health Review 2003/04. Durban: Health Systems Trust; 2004. Barr JT, Schumacher GE, Schumacher GE, Freeman S, LeMoine M, et al. American Translation, Modification and Validation of the St. George's respiratory Questionnaire. Clinical Therapeutics 2000; 22: 1121-1145. Bateman E, "Respiratory health care and Guidelines in South Africa before PAL- Setting the Scene". Paper presented at the 1st International WHO PAL Meeting. Rabat, Morocco. 2002. Beasley R, Holt S, Fabian D, Masoli M. Global Burden of Asthma. Global Initiative for Asthma. Wellington. New Zealand. 2003. 108 Bland JM, Kerry SM. Statistics Notes. Trials randomised in clusters. BMJ 1997; 315:600. Borgdorff MW, Floyd K, Broekmans JF.:. Interventions to reduce tuberculosis mortality and transmission in low- and middle-income countries. Bull World Hea/th Organ 2002;80 (3):217-27. Bradshaw 0, Groenewald P, Laubscher R, Nanna N et al. Initial burden of disease estimates for South Africa. S Afr Med J 2003; 93(9): 682-8. Brou H, Desgrees-du-Lou A, Souville M, Moatti JP, Msellati P. Prophylactic use of cotrimoxazole against opportunistic infections in HIV-positive patients: knowledge and practices of health care providers in Cote d'lvoire. AIDS Care 2003 ;15(5):629-37. Campbell MK, Grimshaw JM. Cluster randomised trials: time for improvement. The implications of adopting a cluster design are still largely ignored. BMJ 1998; 317(7167): 1171-2. Coleman R, Gill G, Wilkinson D. Non communicable disease management in resource-poor settings: a primary care model from rural South Africa. Bull World Health Organ 1998; 76(6):633-40. Daniels A, Biesman R, Otten J. levitt NS, Steyn K, et al. Ambivalence of primary health care professionals towards the South African guidelines for hypertension and diabetes. S Afr Med J2000; 90(12): 1206-11. Davis DA, Taylor-Vaisey A. Translating guidelines into practice: a systematic of theoretical concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines. Can Med Assoc J 1997; 157 (4): 408-416. 109 Del Mar CB, Glasziou PP, Spinks AB. Antibiotics for sore throat. In: The Cochrane library, Issue 3, 2004. Chichester: UK: Software update. Department of Health. Restructuring the National Health System for Universal Primary Health Care. Pretoria PHILAW: 1996. Department of Health. South African Demographic Health Survey. Pretoria: 1998 Department of Health. HIV/AIDS/STD Strategic Plan for South Africa 2000-2005. Pretoria: 2000(a). Department of Health. The Primary HeaHh Care Package for South Africa- a set of norms and standards. Pretoria: 2000(b). Department of Health. Free State Department of Health Annual Report for 2002. Bloemfontein: 2002(a). Department of Health. Integrated Management of Childhood Illnesses; Health Facility Survey: Free State Province Report. Bloemfontein: 2002(b). Department of Health. Cabinet's Decision on "The Operational Plan for Comprehensive Care and Treatment of People Living with HIVand AIDS." Pretoria: 2003(a). Department of Health. South African HIV/AIDS Statistics: National Department of Health; P1-7. Pretoria: 2003(b). DiClemente CC, Prochaska JO. Self-change and therapy change of smoking behaviour: a comparison of processes of change in cessation and maintenance. Addict Behav 1982; 7(2): 133-42. 110 Diette GB, Wu AW, Skinner EA, et al. Treatment patterns among adult patients with asthma: factors associated with overuse of inhaled beta-agonists and under use of inhaled corticosteroids. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159(22): 2697- 704. Doherty T, Calvin M. HIV/AIDS. In: Ijumba, Day C, Ntuli A, editors. South African Health Review 2003/04 Durban: Health Systems Trust; 2004. Donner A, Klar N. Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research. 1st edition. London: Arnold Publishers; 2000. Dye C, Watt CJ, Bleed D. Low access to a highly effective therapy: a challenge for international tuberculosis control. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation 2002; 80(6): 437- 444. Enarson DA, Reider HL, Arnadottir T, Amadattir T, Trebucq A. Tuberculosis Guide for Low Income Countries. 4th ed. Paris: Misereor Publishers; 1996. Fairall L, Donald K, Zwarenstein M, Scherpbier R. "Evaluation of clinical predictors of lung diagnosis in primary care in Cape Town." Paper presented at the 2001 Annual South African Thoracic Society (SATC) Congress. Bloemfontein, Free State: 2001. Flottorp S, Oxman AD, Havelsrud K, Treweek S, Herrin J. Cluster randomised controlled trial of tailored intervention to improve the management of urinary tract infection in women and sore throat. BMJ 2002; 325:367. FreemantIe N, Nazareth I, Eccles M, Wood J, Haines A. A randomized controlled trial of the effect of educational outreach by community pharmacists on prescribing in the UK general practice. Br J Gen Praef 2002; 52 (480): 587-8. 111 Friedman M, Serby C, Menjoge S, et al. Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of a combination of ipratropium plus albuterol compared with ipratropium alone in COPD. Chest 1999;115: 635-641. Gelband H. Regimens of less than six months for treating tuberculosis. In: The Cochrane library, Issue 3, 2004. Chichester, UK: Software update. Green RJ, Greenblatl MM, Plit M, Jones S, Adam B. Asthma management and perceptions in rural South Africa. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2001; 86(3): 343-7. Graham V, Lasserson TJ, Rowe BH. Antibiotics for acute asthma. In: The Cochrane library, Issue 3,2004. Chichester, UK: Software update. Griffiths C, Foster G, Barnes N, Eldridge S, Tate H, et al. Specialist nurse intervention to reduce unscheduled asthma care in a deprived multiethnic area: the east London randomized controlled trial for high risk asthma (ELECTRA). BMJ 2004; 328 (7432):144-4. Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, Fraser C, et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technology Assessment 2004; Vol 8: number 6. Grimwade K, Swingier G. Cotrimoxazole prophylaxis for opportunistic infections in adults with HIV. In: The Cochrane library, Issue 3,2004. Chichester, UK: Software update. Hammond 0, McDonald PW, Fong GT, Borland R. Do smokers know how to quit? Knowledge and perceived effectiveness of cessation assistance as predictors of cessation behaviour. Addiction 2004; 99(8):1042-8. 112 Hopewell PC. Tuberculosis control: How the world has changed since 1990. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation 2002; 80(6): 427. Horner PJ, Thomas B, Gilroy CB, Egger M, Taylor-Robinson D. Do all men attending departments of genitourinary medicine need to be screened for non- gonococcal urethritis? Int J STD AIDS 2002; 13(10):667-73. Hulscher MEJL, Wensing M, Van der Weijden T, Grol R. Intervention to implement prevention in primary care. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2004. Chichester, UK: Software update. International Development Research Centre. Developing and implementing a practical approach to lung health in South Africa (PALSA). Canada; 2004. Kerstjens H, Postma D. Inhaled anticholinergics in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In: The Cochrane library, Issue 3, 2004. Chichester, UK: Software update. Kerry SM, Bland JM. Analysis of a trial randomised in clusters. BMJ 1998; 316:54. Klar N, Donner A. Current and future challenges in the design and analysis of cluster randomization trials. Statist Med2001; 20: 3729-3740. Lalloo UG, Bateman EO, Feldman C, et al. Guidelines for management of chronic asthma in adults-2000 update. South African Pulmonology Society Adult Asthma Working Group. S Afr Med J 2000; 90(5 Pt 2): 544-52. Louwagie GM, Bachmann MO, Reid M. Formal clinical primary health care training. Does it make a difference? Curationis 2002; 25:32-37. 113 Mash B, Bheekie A, Jones PW. Inhaled versus oral steroids for adults with chronic asthma. In: The Cochrane library, Issue 3, 2004. Chichester, UK: Software update. Mbewu A, Simelela N. Operational Plan for Comprehensive HIVand AIDS Care, Management and Treatment for South Africa. Pretoria: Department of Health; 2003. Medical Research Council. Cluster randomised trials: methodological and ethical considerations. MRC clinical trials series. london 2002. Meyers FC, Summers RS, Moller H. Randomized, controlled trial of prescribing training in a South African province. Med Educ 2001; 35(9):833-40. Murray CL, Lopez AD. Evidence-based health policy-lessons from the Global Burden of Disease Study. Science 1996; 274(5288): 740-3. Mwanduaba HC, Squire SB. Fully intermittent dosing with drugs for treating tuberculosis in adults. In: The Cochrane library, Issue 3, 2004. Chichester, UK: Software update. Mwaungulu FB, Floyd S, Crampin AC, et al. Cotrimoxazole prophylaxis reduces mortality in human immunodeficiency virus-positive tuberculosis patients in Karonga District, Malawi. Bull World Health Organ 2004; 82(5): 354-63. Nathan RA, Nayak AS, Grant OF, et al. Mometasone furoute; efficacy and safety in moderate asthma compared to beclomethasone dipropionate. Ann Allergy Asthma Immuno/2001; 86: 203-210. Nolan 0, White R. Symptomatic asthma: attendance and prescribing in general practice. Respir Med. 2002; 96(2):102-9. 114 Pauwels R, Buist A, Calverley P, et al. Global strategy for diagnosis, management and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. NHLBIIWHO global initiative for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (GOLD) workshop summary. Am J Respir Grit Care Med 2001; 163: 1256- 76. Pomilla PV, Brown RB. Outpatient treatment of community acquired pneumonia in adults. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154:1793-1802. Premaratne UN, Sterne JA, Marks GB, Webb JR, Azima H, Burney PG. Clustered randomised trial of an intervention to improve the management of asthma: Greenwich asthma study. BMJ 2000; 320(7234): 580-1. Raviglione MC, Harries AD, Msiska R, Wilkinson D, Nunn P. Tuberculosis and HIV: current status in Africa. AIDS 1997; 11 Suppl B: S115-23. Reddy P. Chronic Diseases In: Ijumba, Day C, Ntuli A, editors. South African Health Review 2003/04; Durban: Health Systems Trust; 2004. Rhew DC, Tu GS, Ofman J, et al. Early switch and early discharge strategies in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161: 722-727. Schneider H, Steyn J. Implementing AIDS policy in post-apartheid South Africa. Sac Sci Med 2001; 52(5):723-31. Segall M. District health care systems in a neoliberal world: a review of five policy areas. Int J Health Plann Manage 2003; 18: S5-26. Sestini P, Renzoni E, Robinson S, et al. Short-acting beta-2 agonists for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2002. Oxford: Update Software. 115 Shisana 0, Simbayi L. Nelson Mandela/HSRC Study of HIV/AIDS-South African National HIV Prevalence, Behavioural Risks and Mass Media Household Survey 2002; Human Sciences Research Council: 2002. Cape Town Smeele IJ, Grol RP, van Schayck CP, van den Bosch WJ, van den Hoogen HJ, et al. Can small group education and peer review improve care for patients with asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? Qual Health Care 1999; 8(2):73-4. Smith B, Appleton S, Adams R, Southcott A, Ruffin R. Home care by outreach nursing for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In: The Cochrane library, Issue 3,2004. Chichester, UK: Software update. Smucny J, Fahey T, Becker L, Glazier R. Antibiotics for acute bronchitis. In: The Cochrane library, Issue 3, 2004. Chichester, UK: Software update. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 8.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.2003. Steyn K, Bradshaw 0, Norman R, Laubscher R, Saloojee Y. Tobacco use in South Africans during 1998: the first demographic and health survey. J Cardiovasc Risk 2002; 9(3): 161-70. The EuroQol group. EuroQol- a new facility for measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990; 16(3): 199-208. Thomson O'Brien MA, Oxman AD, Davis DA, Haynes RB, et al. Educational outreach visits: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. In: The Cochrane library, Issue 3, 2004. Chichester, UK: Software update. 116 Tomson Y, HasseIstrom J, Tomson G, Aberg H. Asthma education for Swedish primary care physicians--a study on the effects of "academic detailing" on practice and patient knowledge. Eur J csn Pharmaco/1997; 53(3-4}:191-6. Volmink J, Garner P. Directly observed therapy for treating tuberculosis. In: The Cochrane library, Issue 3,2004. Chichester, UK: Software update. Waiters EH, Waiters J. Inhaled short acting 82 agonist use in asthma: regular versus as needed treatment. In: The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2001. Oxford, UK: Software update. WaIters EH, Waiters JAE, Gibson MOP. Inhaled long acting beta agonists for stable chronic asthma. In: Thé Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2004. Chichester, UK: Software update. Welsehen I, Kuyvenhoven MM, Hoes AW, Verheij TJ. Effectiveness of a multiple intervention to reduce antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract symptoms in primary care: randomized controlled trial. BMJ 2004; 329(7463}:431 World Health Organisation. World Health Report 2000- Burden of disease in disability adjusted life years (DAL Y) by cause, sex and mortality stratum by WHO regions, estimates for 1999. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2000. World Health Organisation: World Health Report 2001- Burden of disease in disability adjusted life years (DAL Y) by cause, sex and mortality stratum by WHO regions, estimates for 2000. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2001. World Health Organisation: World Health Report 2002- Burden of disease in DAL Y by cause, sex and mortality stratum by WHO regions, estimates for 2001. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2002. 117 World Health Organisation: World Health Report 2003- Burden of disease in DAL Y by cause, sex and mortality stratum by WHO regions, estimates for 2002. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2003 (a). World Health Organisation: Treatment of Tuberculosis: Guidelines for National Programmes. 3m Edition. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2003 (b). World Health Organisation: Practical Approach to Lung Health (PAL) P1-14. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2003 (c). World Health Organisation: Global tuberculosis control South Africa country profile for 2003. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2004 (a). World Health Organisation: Rules of procedures of the Executive Board. Constitution of the World Health Organisation- Chapter /I (Functions): 44th Edition. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2004 (b). WHO/UNICEF: Integrated Management of Childhood Illnesses (IMCI) Model Chapter for Textbooks. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2001. Zachariah R, Harries AD, Arendt V, Wennig R, Schneider S, et al. Compliance with cotrimoxazole prophylaxis for the prevention of opportunistic infections in HIV- positive tuberculosis patients in Thyolo district, Malawi. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2001; 5(9):843-6. Zachariah R, Spielmann MP, Harries AD, Gomani P, Bakali E. Cotrimoxazole prophylaxis in HIV-infected individuals after completing anti-tuberculosis treatment in Thyolo, Malawi. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2002; 6(12):1046-50 Zwar N, Wolk J, Gordon J, Sanson-Fisher R, Kehoe L. Influencing antibiotic 118 prescribing in general practice: a trial of prescriber feedback and management guidelines. Family Practice 1999;16: 495-500. Zweygarth M, Summers RS. "Standard treatment guidelines/essential drugs list database for South Africa." Paper presented at "Conference 2000- 14th Annual Conference for the South African Association of Hospital and Institutional Pharmacists (SAAHIP): Rustenburg. 2000. 119 ANNEX 1 PALSA Guidelines Al CONTENTS PATIENT WITH .DIFFICULT.BREATHING AND/OR COUGH Classify according to symptoms 1 Symptoms <2 weeks: ASSESSMENT AND INITIAL MANAGEMENT 2 Further treatment of the wheezing patient: AS-THMAlC0PD:EXACERBATI.oN 3 Discharge plan for the wheezing' panent who has respondêd to;treathlent 4 Further treatment of the patient-wlthfever and/or_pain on breathing ,'and'.qoughihg:LOWER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION 5 UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTIONS Mildlyill patient with runtiy/bloc-ked nose: RHINITIS '.' ····--6--- Mildly ill patient with-pain and/or. tenderness oversinuses: A.CWTE:SlNI,J.SITIS . . 7 Mildly lll patient with sore throat ,AClJTEPHARYNGITIS, TONSILtJ1JS.,;,()R)\L:CANDIPA 8 Mildly ill patient with ear problem: ACUTE AND CHRONIC 'EAR':PROBLEMS 10 Dry mopping the ear . t1 SYMPTOMS > 2 WEEKS w>- Diagnosing obstructive lung disease 12 Management· of chronic a sthma 13 Management of chronic obstructive 'pulmoAary disease JPOPD} 14 Chronic cough with or without sputum produqtioo; no breathlessness: ;CHRONIC BRONCHITIS 15 TUBERCULOSIS (TB). Diagnosing TB 16 Sputum results 17 Follow-up plan forRegimen One 18 Follow-up plan for Regimen'Two 19 HIV/AIDS ------_ ..,--_... _ ..,------ Suspecting HIV/AIDS 20 Follow-up ofthe known HIV-positive patient 21 Who is eligible for long-term cotrirnoxazole (Bactrim) prophylaxis? 22 • Name • Age • Medical history • Presenting symptoms • Purpose of the visit >~- Exclude TB Exclude TB • Asthma (Go to page 13) (Go to page 16) (Go to page 16) • COPD (Go to page 14) Consider Chronic Consider Asthma • TB (Go to page 16) Bronchitis orCOPD • HIV/AIDS (Go to page (Go to page 15) (Go to page 12) IF ONE OR MORE SYMPTOMS PRESENT, ASSESS SEVERITY MILD - ----------------------. per minute 100-119 per minute Blood streaking -- - .--"----- ...._..---I ;> ASK, LISTEN: ASK, VI MEASURE: Wheezing, tight chest? Fever and/or pain on breathing or Most likely asthma coughing or chronic and/or sputum obstructive production airways disease (COPD) Most likely LRTI, TB exacerbation. or suppurative lung disease. Go to page 3 Go to page 5 . FURTHER TREATMENT OF THE WHEEZING PATIENT: ACUTE ASTHMA/COPD EXACERBATION "--t;:~\9~~~~~ • 4 puffs beta-agonist via spaeer every 20 minutes for one hour then reassess. OR Nebulise using beta-agonist every 20 minutes for one hour then reassess . • Give 1 dose of oral prednisone 40 mg stat. >0-\ OBSERVE FOR ONE MORE HOUR, REPEAT ABOVE TREATMENT AND FOllOW TREATMENT. PLAN FOR THEN FOllOW DISCHARGE PLAN ASSESS WITHIN ONE HOUR SEVERE PATIENT ON PAGE 2. ON PAGE4 If worsening of symptoms, treat as severe and refer. If no response within two hours, refer. -tncrease the dose and frequency of the inhaled bronchodilator to a maximum of 2 puffs 4 times a day. -If the patient is already on inhaled corticosteroids: check compliance (are medications taken twice a day, every day) : check inhaler technique (are the inhalers used correctly) -If poor compliance and/or techriique instruct patient on correct drug usage . •Give 40mg of prednisone orally (once daily) for 7 days to patients with the following: -History of recent emergency visits for asthma. -Worsening of asthma symptoms in the months or weeks prior the onset of the acute attack. -History of previous hospital or intensive care unit admission for asthma. -If the patient reports a cough with new or increased sputum production and/or change in sputum colour (yellow, green) and/or fever, > add Amoxycillin 500mg three times a day for 7 days OR if penicillin-allergic, Erythromycin 500mg four times a day for 7 days.-...J -If the underlying lung condition is unknown, go to page 12 to make diagnosis . • Encourage all patients to stop smoking cigarettes, pipes or dagga . • Book follow-up visit before medicines are expected to run out. TELL PATIENT TO RETURN IF: .Symptoms get worse . •Not better after a course of oral prednlsone has been completed. IS THIS PATIENT AT HIGH RISK OF SEVERE NOT AT HIGH RISK OF SEVERE RESPIRATORY RESPIRATORY INFECTION? INFECTION? • ~ 60 years old I) Frail with suspected AIDS • Bed rest at home o Known: Lung disease • Encourage high fluid intake Heart disease • No smoking Liver disease • Treat pain and fever with paracetamol 1-2 tablets 4 times a Diabetes Mellitus day. • If new or increased sputum production with colour change, prescribe Amoxycillin 500mg orally three times a day for 7 days OR if penicillin-allergic, Erythromycin 500mg orally 6 >- hourly for 7 days. 00 • Look for signs of HIV/AIDS (Go to page 20) • Ask about symptoms of TB (such as loss of weight, night Immediately give 1 gram Amoxycillin orally sweats) (Go to page 16) OR If penicillin-allergic, Erythromycin 500mg orally Refer if: AND • Getting worse, or no response. REFER TO NEXT LEVEL FACILITY OR CLINIC • Still not completely better within 7 days. DOCTOR Ask about associated If: • Mild sore throat Symptoms on most days for 2:: 4 weeks, ask about • Fever • Sneezing • Itching Consider: Common cold Consider: Allergic rhinitis (hayfever) >- \0 REASSURE PATIENT THAT • 0.9% saline nose drops. • 0.9% saline nose drops. ANTIBIOTICS ARE NOT NECESSARY. • Chlorpheniramine 4mg 3-4 • Chlorpheniramine 4mg 3-4 times a day when necessary times a day when necessary Beware: Side-effect is Beware: Side-effect is Consider oxymetazoline 0.05% sedation. ,: sedation. nose drops, 2 drops in each nostril every 6-8 hours for no longer than • Refer to next level facility for 1 day. steroid nasal spray. • Clear nasal discharge. • Symptoms ;:::7 days. 4» Mild pain over sinuses. • Severe symptoms regardless of duration. o Post-nasal drip. • Pussy nasal discharge. • Face or tooth pain and tenderness. Consider: Bacterial sinusitis .,-..".:,?:!:~- • Amoxycillin 500mg orally three times a day for 10 days OR If penicillin-allergic, give cotrimoxazole (Bactrim) 2 tablets (80/400mg) twice a day for 5 days. >- • Instruct patient to mix 1/2 teaspoon salt + 1 teaspoon • Instruct patient to mix 1/2 teaspoon salt + 1 teaspoono bicarbonate of soda in 500mllukewarm water. Sniff up bicarbonate of soda in 500mllukewarm water. Sniff up each nostril every 4-6 hours. each nostril every 4-6 hours. OR OR 0.9% Sodium chloride drops in each nostril every 4-6 0.9% Sodium chloride drops in each nostril every 4-6 hours. hours. • Oxymetazoline 0.05% nose drops.ê drops in each • Oxymetazoline 0.05% nose drops, 2 drops in each nostril every 6-8 hours for no longer than 5 days. nostril every 6-8 hours for no longer than 5 days. • Paracetamol 1-2 tablets 4 times a day. • Paracetamol 1-2 tablets 4 times a day. Refer if: • Tooth abscess suspected. • Swelling around eye or face. • Failure to respond to medication after 10 days. RED THROAT RED THROAT, WITH WHITE PATCHES ON WITHOUT PUS PUS OR WHITE CHEEKS, GUMS, PATCHES ON TONSILS TONGUE AND PALATE Consider: Bacterial tonsillitis Consider: Oral candida (thrush) REASSURE PATIENT THAT • Salt water mouthwash (1/2 • Nystatin lozenges 100000 IU - 4 ANTIBIOTICS ARE NOT teaspoon salt in a glass of warm times a day for 10 days. NECESSARY. water). Gargle twice a day. OR • Phenoxymethylpenicillin (Pen VK) Nystatin 100000 IU/mI1-2 ml :> 500mg orally every 6 hours for 10 4 times a day for 10 days. days. OR If penicillin-allergic, give • Exclude HIV infection.• Salt water mouthwash (1/2 teaspoon salt in a glass of warm Erythromycin 250mg 6 hourly (Go to page 20) water). Gargle twice a day. before meals for 10 days. • Paracetamol 1-2 tablets 4 times a • Paracetamol 1-2 tablets 4 times a day. day. Refer if: Refer if: • Severe swallowing problems. • No response to Nystatin within 5 • Inability to open mouth. days. Fluconazole to be prescribed • More than 4 documented by doctor. episodes per year. • Extensive disease. • Recurrent episodes. ~ C'O C'O .-C.Cl)t:Cl) e E C'O )( W A12 • Give Flucloxacillin ~::~~Mj\i~~•~~Give Flucloxacillin 250mg ~~'i~ • Dry mop ear . The ear can only heal if 250mg orally 4 times a ~:';~~*i1!.~~ orally 4 ti.mes a day. ~f"t•'.j~"'1; (Go to page 11) _1l~ll!l11l1· dry.:-> tt; 1~i1 OR d.1!l~;"';;;day OR ._.~'1,v1~_-..I,~~ If penicillin-allergic, give ~~ •• Amoxycillin 250mg ~ltB~~1111~£·_.D~ry1mop ear.w If penicillin-allergic, give ~~.iil;;~tt:-4:~~f"'',rtj'; Erythromycin stearate \~vt~::;::.;a orally three times a day B~\:'$l~,Iti.(4f-l1i:Jfi;ti (Go to page 11)Erythromycin stearate 1:Ni":f~"i~~fJ250mg 4 times a day for <~kfJ"l\i~.'i~f.'J;·ff,~250mg 4 times a day for $]i~@~'\m~~I~5 days ~!';i~~;@t;:!1ï!.)!"*'"r>'~!il for 5 daY~R •• . Paracetamol 1-2 tablets5 days. ~]~~~1~~1] tl. If penicillin-allergic, give ~~lUI~{W$l~]fJg;:!l~[f~ 4 times a day for pain, • 2 0,'< Acetic, aci•d• aIeohol, .~~"~"~>.".".,,.,,0 In c ~~ Bactrim 2 tablets• Paracetamol 1 - 2 $«t.~r~{~~W~,i{t~~"J6 hourly for 5 days. ~r~'!Wilil %'!:; (80/400mg) twice a daytablets 4 times a day for for 5 days. pai.n. lr,;-.m~Y~~iW\!~/r*i,~'f~I~i.,·.~.~·~~. tD~~ry mop ear. •.~~'i.'~"",;.~ (Go to page 11) "l-~. Paracetamol 1-2 tablets ,!}i't'ë®!!_.'_~.,.~...2~f1 4 times a day for pain. • Paracetamol 1 - 2 tablets 4 times a day for pain. ,""'"""'ffii&Y",,'Jii R f 'f ~i\ i!lli';~I(i:•~e er I : ti ·tN ~J~{.~~'4.~i~,,:Jtirt;.;F"~~~ Refer .if'' Refer if: ~~.~ - - No response after 5 .ti,~~., '\•\"l(#i.i !•."'~- ~<,$!.No Improvement after 4'?~ • Diabetic. 4;;:~._:"'~-;-~i.. days. ~~~~~~! n ;~~~ ,;.;" weeks.!ir~~• If no response within 1· Swelling and tenderness ~",,1,-~,,,!,~~. -'~~$;lji--i"'l!¥~ill ~\'-,-:fdf,flJij,l~§j~l;'l1m:i~' il>.g-ilR~~ i~· Fou I-sme Irmg d'ISCharge. ~eer~e tfi'~!' "')ll;~- ~~ .".. .48 hrs. of skin behind ear. ,,';iLila.rge hole In eardrum. = _,_ • Persistent pain. ~~~~. Hearing loss. Otitis Externa Acute Otitis Media Chronic Otitis Media Inflamed eardrum Red swollen ear canal Dry perforation Inflamed, swollen >-- outer ear""" Demonstrate method to patient. • Roll a piece of paper towel into a wick. • Insert wick into ear and remove once it is wet. • Repeat 4 times a day until ear is dry. • Insert acetic acid ear drops if indicated (go to page 10) - 4 drops in affected ear. • Never leave the wick or any other object inside the ear. ",.~,,?'!''- Ask if: Symptoms started during childhood or early adulthood. • Symptoms started later in life (usually after the age of 35 years). History of hayfever, eczema and/or allergies. • Symptoms slowly worsened over a long period of time. Family history of asthma. • Long history of daily or frequent cough and sputum production (usually starts long before the onset of shortness of breath). Symptoms only during attacks with periods of normal breathing in between. • Short of breath for most of the day, rather than at night or during the:-> early hours of the morning only.Symptoms are usually worse: at night; in the early hours of the\Jl morning; during an upper respiratory tract infection or when the • History of heavy smoking eg. more than 20 cigarettes / day for 15weather changes. years or more. Symptoms improve or disappear after using inhaler. TREAT AS ASTHMA. TREAT AS COPD. REFER TO DOCTOR WITHIN 1 MONTH REFER TO DOCTOR WITHIN 1 MONTH. Go to page 13 Go to page 14 (If unsure, treat as asthma) If s 1 feature of asthma, and no significant history of smoking, consider a cardiac or non-lung cause of breathlessness, especially if associated hypertension, ischaemic heart disease and/or diabetes mellitus . ._~." .~.....«.,.;,~"~"..>.~".".#.~.,,.~~-""!_'-~"~*,W:~:~~~~~~~~E(~,::;:yr~m~~?·~~~~~~~f1~~~~~~r~~~~~~~*~~~:.g:)~["~~}::, The aim of asthma management is to obtain complete control of all features of asthma. Aim for: 1) Minimal (ideally no) daytime and night time symptoms 2) Min~imal or~no exacerbations (asthma attacks)3) Minimal need for quick-relief medications~3',£(,'~.;'>,iJ~~~~~*~'!ili!t.m\~~I£\!!:1-'£,"2¥.i'!lK®i:1'~,,- 0\ IF COMPLETE CONTROL AT ANY LEVEL OF IF POOR CONTROL AT ANY LEVEL OF TREATMENT TREATMENT Increase to next level of treatment (step-up). • Continue current medication. Consider adding prednisone 40mg orally once daily for o At next visit, reduce treatment to previous level (step- 7 days and reassess in 1 month. down ) if control is still complete. Schedule next appointment. • Encourage patients to stop smoking in order to prevent worsening of disease. • Improve symptoms with inhaled bronchodilators. • Recognise and treat acute exacerbations early. ENCOURAGE THE PATIENT TO STOP SMOKING Ask: Identify and document all tobacco use at each visit. Advise: Strongly urge the patient to quit. Assess: Determine willingness to make a quit attempt. Assist: Help the patient to quit. Arrange: Schedule follow-up contact. I MODERATE I SEVERE I1t~ft.~éi~r8N'gITH ~:CTION ~---1 »_-. !I Symptoms I Mild-·b-;~~.;~I~ssnesson I B~~~~~ï~ssnes~on minimal I Ankle oedem~""""""'" : Increased sputum _ I I i purulence or colour I-J usual activity I activity or continuously. change to yellow/green i ~-._...- ' ..- ---1·-·---- ..) 1 Treatment Options I Bronchodilators I Inhaled salbutamol 2 puffs when needed 2 puffs when needed 2 puffs 4 times a day 2 puffs when needed Inhaled ipratoplum 2 puffs when needed 2 puffs 4 times a day 2 puffs when needed bromide (up to 4 times per day) (up to 4 times per day) '- ._L~ tablet 2 times per day 11 tablet 2 times per day 1 tablet 2 times per day! 1 tablet 2 times per day! Amoxycillin 500mg three times a day for 7 days OR If penicillin-allergic, Erythromycin 500mg four times for 7 days. Prednisone 40mg orally '1 L.._~o~~_~~.~.~]_4!~d~a~ys f;.~~mtIf.J:~~trn:k~ic!@ II Usually in heavy smokers, or those with lung damage. o Daily cough with or without sputum production for months or years. 9 Usually begins in middle or old age. • Heavy occupational (dust. mines. industry) or domestic air pollution (indoor fires or gas stoves) exposure in some. ;> 00 THE MOST EFFECTIVE TREATMENT IS TO REMOVE THE CAUSE! • All patients should be advised to stop smoking. • If possible. avoid domestic pollution. occupational exposure and substance abuse (eg. dagga). Refer: • If no history of smoking. SUSPECT TB WHEN: • Patient reports cough for ~ 2 weeks. III Unintentional weight loss. e Loss of appetite. • Night sweats and fever. o Blood-stained sputum. Known HIV-positive or AIDS patients. Test sputum: Label bottles before dispensing them to patients. METHOD OF SPUTUM COLLECTION Patient: Nurse: >.....-.. • Must stand in a well- • Must not stand in front of \0 ventilated room or patient during the outside. procedure. Day 1: For Acid-Fast Bacilli Day 1: For Acid-Fast Bacilli • Replace and secure the (AFB's). (AFB's). Cl Rinse mouth with water. lid immediately. • Wash hands after Day 2: Early morning sputum, Day 2: Two early morning • Take a deep breath, and handling specimen. at home, for AFB's. sputa, at home. cough forcibly. e Place specimen in bag II 1 for AFB's and store in fridge while III 1 for culture and sensitivity awaiting collection. testing. CXR report does not suggest active TB or other condition requiring immediate referral. Repeat 1 sputum for AFBs Schedule follow-up Sputum AFB- • Give Amoxycillin 250 mg orally 3 times a day for 7 days . • Schedule follow-up. Little improvement Improvement ;J> o Repeat 1 sputum • Suggests other oN for AFBs respiratory diagnosis • Notify and register patient. • If new case, or previous confirmed TB treatment for < 4 weeks, register as NEW CASE; SPUTUM-POSITIVE PULMONARY TB and start the intensive phase of REGIMEN 1. (Go to page 18) • If previous TB treatment tor z 4 weeks, register as RETREATMENT PATIENT; SPUTUM-POSITIVE PULMONARY TB, and start the intensive phase of REGIMEN 2. (Go to page 19) o Offer HIV test to all patients. (Go to page 20) Select DOT su -v; ",- ,~:::, . • ~ .:,.. ..... -.:"-' Sputa AFB+ AFB- OR Sputa AFB+ AFB+ • Continue intensive phase for 1 more month. At the end of 3 MONTHS, repeat 2 sputa for AFBs • Schedule follow-up. :> l.'I!~~~%~%r;i~ N Sputa AFB+ AFB- OR Sputa AFB+ AFB+ • Take sputum for culture and sensitivity. • Schedule follow-up. • If susceptible, continue. If resistant refer to MOR unit. .~.:.1;-:: START CONTINUATION PHASE < 50 kg Rifampicinllsoniazid 150/100mg. 3 tablets Rifampicinllsoniazid 300/150mg. . At the end of 5 months of treatment, take 2 sputa for AFBs. Schedule follow-up. r~.~~'ï~J'~1~~~Ë'"Jlf~~~frrrlfa::~j ~~~~l~~~6.~1.f'!l~~~~~~~~~1&~~4H~~~~~~fj:S~~~ t:;J(fr::~:·~:~I-,~;:~·\.;"·,::~;.·~'!~.,·2·:j~~,:.~,'·::. Sputa AFB- AFB- or unable to produce sputum. Sputa AFB+ AFB- OR Sputa AFB+ AFB+ • Stop treatment and register as CURED. • Register as TREATMENT FAILURE. • Discharge from TB clinic. • Take sputum for culture and sensitivity • Refer HIV-positive patients to the general clinic for • Re-register as a RETREATMENT patient, and refer to follow-up further management. plan for Regimen 2. START INTENSIVE PHASE Rifampicin/lsoniazid/Pyrazinamide/Ethambutol 120/60/300/200mg (given 5 days a week) PLUS Streptomycin (given 5 days a week) intramuscularly. THIRD MONTH Rifampicin/lsoniazid/Pyrazinamide/Ethambutol 120/60/300/200mg (given 5 days a week) ONLY 4 tablets 5 tablets _"U~·:;:~ ~4£~;~f~-''''''':;:~·é:·. At 6 ~w-eeks r-e._v-_i.ew-.-the_--s-._us_c-e-~p~ti~b~ili.t_y---_.-r-e-sults of the initial sputum. If:. "'.-.'- --'- .. _,_, _'-, .. ..... Susceptible • Continue treatment i}~~~,t~:!~:~~~srZ::)i?-~.t:·i-~,:_;~~~;.'·~:;~~~~}'·."~'·'" At the end of 3 months, repeat 2 sputa for AFBs »- • Schedule follow-up tv tv ~1?i:~2%1f,gi~~~~r&f~~?~~[~t~~~~~~if;j~}t4!~ Sputa AFB+ AFB- OR Sputa AFB+ AFB+ .• Repeat sputum for culture and sensitivity .• Schedule follow-up --.·..~,.~t START CONTINUATION PHASE . < 50 kg ~50 kg Rifampicin/Isoniazid 150/100mg + Ethambutol 400mg 3 tablets + 2 tablets Rifampicin/Isoniazid 300/150mg + Ethambutol 400mg 2 tablets + 3 tablets ~*.i~;;jL1.~~:.~'.i&i~tFb~~j:_i:~~~1;~:%.;j~].)r.~,):;:::;:::?~_~;,~_:~,.'.~.~.;y'...:'-:.~ .~~f'1:!5;?!i,:,-m-;~;:):,-:);.):'c.';_~t.:~Fj~:f~~'~~f.:j.i;~:;:f:..~~S{.,!~~~~~~~~'U;i$tf:.£~~.~~t~*;~;B2~~~~~:i:'f.i:i~~·:W.:;~:J~1~.¥tf~fJ,I~~:r~·:?11;1ft~j:~.~·_,~~:t:l<:iJ:~~:~;;~~i;!'v.~';:~:;·r".:~·~~J.h~~}:';:~::\~;\;;~:-~·'·.f~ At the end of 7 months of treatment, take 2 sputa for AFBs. Schedule follow-up. ~:..~~j._it.~·,$4'?§jal;~!~;:.é-ji1;5..tt't~~~'t·:'".:.~.j.~.;:~,?.....:::~.~:~,: ·;:"?~·~~:·-$i;,'_! ~;~:il-;,~,,;:'/;.~;~i~';~·.:~;!~.~~~~:';}~:!!~s:.~~r.~"'P;~~~7t?¥~.~ "P :~;:j}.;:,.:..:~~s:,:'if'i:~.:".;.~:·.f::' ,r ~~::.·{r.~'~..' ,.:, ""~.:.~:.';"',';:";-,:}."'-".'. , Sputa AFB- AFB· or unable to produce sputum. Sputa AFB+ AFB- OR Sputa AFB+ AFB+ • Stop treatment and regislerasCURED. • Register as TREATMENT FAILURE. • Discharge from TB clinic. • Take sputum for culture and sensitivity. • Refer HIV-positive patients to the general clinic for management. " Refer to MOR unit. I) Painless swollen glands • Recurrent respiratory infections • Long history of diarrhoea • Mouth lesions eg. Oral candida • History of engaging in high-risk behaviour (eg. Vaginal, anal or oral • Skin infections eg. Herpes Zoster sex without a condom) o Severe weight loss IJ Unexplained fever for> 4 weeks • Sexually transmitted infections White patches in the mouth, which are scratched off with difficulty, causing bleeding (ORAL THRUSH/CANDIDA). Painful rash with blisters, confined to one part of the body (HERPES ZOSTER). Bluish-black patches or lumps on skin or mouth (KAPOSI'S SARCOMA). Evidence of severe loss of weight. Genital ulcers or discharge. ;l> tv \jj INFORM ABOUT VOLUNTARY CONFIDENTIAL COUNSELLING AND TESTING (VCCT) Educate patient about HIV/AIDS, methods of transmission and risk factors. Explain about VCCT: Who will perform the counselling and the testing. That it is completely voluntary .: That testing is confidential. How testing is done. When and how results are given. What the results means. • If patient agrees to have VCCT, refer to the lay counsellor for testing. • If a lay counsellor is not available, refer to health facility where testing is available. ~~.::.::~:::-\''-:;};:-r': c, ::::'~':'~' '<::;~"~~>~-:~··;~:'1:';.;:1.·~:~d:'~:':::::~~t:~·)~ ei Establish a relationship with the patient and encourage regular follow-up. o Respect his/her right to confidentiality. fil Refer to the lay counsellor should the patient require further counselling. El Encourage safer-sex practices. IJ Provide medical care at each visit. Cl! Look for and treat HIV-related diseases. )- ORAL ASYMMETRIC LARGE ANY OTHER HIV- ~tv THRUSH/CANDIDA GLANDS RELATED DISEASES . Refer: Refer to: For exclusion of extra- South African Department pulmonary TB. of Health booklet:Recommendations for the prevention and treatment of opportunistic and HIV- related diseases in adult. (www.htlp://196.36.153.56 /doh/aids/docs/adult.html) WHO IS ELIGIBLE FOR LIFE-LONG COTRIMOXAZOLE (BACTRIM) PROPHYLAXIS? .. (2 SINGLE STRENGTH TABLETS (80/400MG) PER DAY) • All HIV-infected TB patients. • Cotrimoxazole (Bactrim) prophylaxis is started at a higher- level facility. • All symptomatic HIV patients (World Health Organisation (WHO) stage 2,3,4). Refer below. al If previous diagnosis of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. .' .. •-. ••'.C,'_·'- ADAPTED FROM THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION (WHO) CLINICAL STAGING FOR HIV INFECTION STAGE 1 STAGE 3 )0- Without symptoms. Significant unintentional weight loss. N Acute viral illness following HIV infection. Diarrhoea for more than a month. Vi Persistent swollen glands < 2 cm and symmetrical. Fever for more than a month. Oral thrush/candida. STAGE 2 Pulmonary TB in the last year. Unintentional weight loss. Severe pneumonia or other bacterial infections. Minor mouth and skin conditions (dry skin, mouth ulcers, fungal Vaginal candida for more than one month, or poor response to nail infections). therapy. Herpes Zoster within the last 5 years. Recurrent upper respiratory tract infections (eg. sinusitis). STAGE4 Chronic weight loss plus diarrhoea or fever. Diagnosed opportunistic infection. Extra-pulmonary TB. Kaposi's sarcoma. HIV dementia. Diagnosed cancer (eg. Lymphoma). AUTHORS , Dr R. English Professor E. Bateman ...-..n-rQII~fOIIIH > Dr M. Zwarenstein -"""""tv 0\ CONTRIBUTORS Members of the PALSA project. - ~MRC -=:zma .. ~IU:..1.M..C.t",. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Professor S. Naidoo for the use of the images of oral candida. Professor C. Prescott for the use of the images of the various ear conditions. \~m\~ J WClM.DlCItlnl~ ANNEX2 PALSA Training Record A27 PALS A TRAINING RECORD Please complete for every training visit Fax completed forms to Bosielo Majara 051 4489278 Name of Trainer: Name of Clinic: Date of Training session: A TTENDANCE REGISTER (complete at clinic) First Name Surname Rank e.g. CPN, SN, Year qualified from nursing EN college TOPICS COVERED DURING SESSION (S) Tick topics covered during the trainiru visit. You may tick more than one topic. Severely ill respiratory patients Asthma I COPD URTI TB LRTI HIV TRAVEL DETAILS Indicate type of car used for travel to the clinic. You may tick only one box. Subsidized government car Private vehicle Car from government pool ~!~: ';'(l"Jj,Ji)lP;t'~l~:~~;U·:·t~;:~~~,'iilljt~:y$~..iKf~ Time spent on PALSA activities at Time spent on non-PALSA clinic activities at clinic A28 ANNEX3 Standard letter to district/clinic managers A29 THE UNIVERSITY OFTHE ORA"ICE FREE~"ATE Department of Community Health Faculty of Health Sciences Mr. B.P.Majara Dept. Community Health (Research Unit) PO Bnx 339 (GS2) Telephone: 27 (051) 4()53625, fax: 44R927R Bloemfontein 'JJOO, South Africa Email: gngmhpm@med.uovs.ac.1.1 The District Manager Ms T Morigihlane Lejweleputswa District Kopano Complex Private bag X 15 WELKOM 9460 Tel: 057 3524375 Fax: 0573529277 26 March 2003 Dear Ms Morigihlane This is a follow up to a letter dated 26 March 2003 which was transmitted to you by fax on the same day regarding the Practical Approach to Lung Health in South Africa (PALSA) Project. Kindly note that following that letter, the following developments have taken place regarding the project: I. Some of scheduled training of professional clinic nurses by PALSA trained TB Coordinators in your district have commenced. We are keeping record of all trained clinic staff and this activity is scheduled to go up to September- October this year. 2. Preparations are underway to conduct Lung a Health Survey to establish the extent of adult lung problems in the province. As part of the survey, we wish to collect some information in the 40 trial clinics in the province, some of which fall within your district. We will be sending field workers to collect data on lung disease in the 40 clinics at the beginning of May through to November this year. These field workers will receive training on all aspects of data collection for the project next week. By this letter, we hereby solicit the following administrative support from you and your district health team: (a) That our field workers be provided with office space for conducting interviews with patients presenting with respiratory disease at the primary care clinic. The fieldwork is expected to take a maximum of five days per clinic. (b) That during the fieldwork (preferably at the end of each day), our field workers be allowed to use the clinic's telephone line to transmit data to a central information base for the project through a toll free number. This will be done by down loading from a A30 PDA, a device used for collecting data in place of a paper questionnaire. This will have absolutely NO financial implications on the clinic's monthly telephone bill. (c) That you kindly convey the above two messages (a &b) to management of clinics that fall under your supervision. We promise to cause minimal disruption to clinic operations during our fieldwork. I will follow up with the clinics' management on the exact dates of the fielding of our data collectors and will keep you informed all the way. Below once again is a list of clinics in you district which are part of the survey which our field workers will be assigned to visit: For further clarification on the above issues, please do not hesitate to contact me at any of the above contact addresses. Regards, £ Bosi·e10Ma·Jara I" Community Health D artment. UFS List of clinics I. Khothalong 2. AM Kruger 3. Hoopstad 4. Bothaville 5. Bophelong (Odend) 6. Thabong 7. Tshepong 8. K-Maile 9. Albert Luthuli Mem 10. Phomolong (Henn) Il. Welkom 12. Boithusong A31 ANNEX4 Doctor's Letter A32 Dear Doctor March 2003 The Practical Approach to Lung Health in South Africa (PALSA) is a WHO initiative to improve the management of adult patients with respiratory disease in primary care, particularly the initial care provided by frontline nurses. It follows in the footsteps of the widely successful Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) in that it has adopted a syndromic approach whereby patients are categorized and treated according to symptoms. Clinicians and Researchers from the University of Cape Town Lung Institute, Medical Research Council and University of the Free State have adapted the package for local use in collaboration with primary care physicians and nurses, and the Free State Department of Health. The next step is to test whether the programme improves the treatment of patients. This will be achieved by means of a controlled trial involving 40 clinics in the Free State between April and November 2003. District TB co-ordinators will train nursing practitioners at clinic level and the impact on rational prescribing practices, TB case detection and the health status of patients will be measured. An economic evaluation will examine at what cost any benefits are obtained. Implementation of PALSA should have little impact on your clinical activities. However, you might recognize changes in the nature of patients referred and the treatment that has been initiated in the pilot clinics. These include the following: 1. PALSA will teach nurses to identify severely ill adult patients requiring transfer to the next level facility using "danger signs". 2. Provision has been made for Primary Care Nursing Practitioners (PCNPs) in pilot sites to initiate cotrimoxazole prophylaxis in HIV-infected symptomatic patients. 3. These PCNPs may also initiate inhaled steroids in known or suspected asthmatics provided that the patient is reviewed by a doctor within weeks of starting treatment 4. PCNPs may also prescribe short courses of oral steroids for patients with exacerbations of asthma and COPD. These provisions have been approved by the Pharmaceutical and Therapeutics Committee of the Department of Health of the Free State for the purpose of the study, and policy will be reviewed at the end of the pilot phase. Your understanding and assistance is integral to the success of the programme and we look forward to sharing the results of the pilot phase with you. Should you require further information please contact: Dr Lara Fairall Mr Bosielo Majara University of Cape Town Department of Community Health Lung Institute University of the Free State Phone: 021 4066850 Phone: 051 4053625 Email: Ifairall@uctgsh1.uct.ac.za Email: gngmbpm@med.uovs.ac.za Best wishes The PALSA Team A33 ANNEX5 Drug Circular A34 FREE STATE PROVINCE M. Makhele Clinic Manager Botshabelo Clinic B PO Box 5051 Botshabelo 9781 Fax: 051 5341096 Dear M. Makhele Re: Practical Approach to Lung Health in South Africa Changes in prescribing provisions for Primary Care Nursing Practitioners This letter follows previous correspondence detailing the Practical Approach to Lung Health training programme which is being 'piloted in your clinic. The following changes in prescribing provisions have been made for Primary Care Nursing Practitioners (PCNPs) trained in the programme. They are as follows: 1. PCNPs may initiate lifelong cotrimoxazole prophylaxis (dose = 2 single strength tablets or 960mg daily) in HIV positive patients with symptoms. 2. PCNPs may initiate inhaled steroids (Inflammide® maximum daily dose of 800mcg) in known or suspected asthmatics provided patients are reviewed by a doctor within one month. 3. PCNPs may prescribe short courses of oral steroids (40mg daily for 7 days) in patients with asthma ICOPD exacerbations. These changes have been approved by the Pharmaceutical and Therapeutics Committee of the Free State Department of Health and financial provision has been made under the TB programme. The drugs are available from the Medicines Depot on request. The changes will be reviewed at the end of the pilot in order to inform policy in the rest of the province. In order to maximize the benefits of the PALSA training in your clinic, we ask that you please ensure that these medications are available to Primary Care Nursing Practitioner staff in your clinic from commencement of the PALSA training. ~-r.~ ~ .. ~ o.,..._OIIa...1do ~.~":: :::::-.:-:':'= ':;;;::;~;;~:i~;a;,'.~D:ep..artmc..nt of Health 'I" De_p,a_ r.tc,_m_' ent v_._an__ G' es"o_'n, d._h.,.e._id ._~._""L__ef_ap__-.._h..a L- a-._B.. op- .helo Bo Botle '·7:;;~';;~~;~;;·~"'1j- General Manager - Health Support, Dr RI) Chapman, • PO Box 227, Bloemfontein 9300 • Tel: 051-4033431 Fax: 051-4098008 e-mail - chapmard@doh.ofs.gov.za • Room 505, Lebohang Building, St Andrews Street. Bloemfontein A35 If you have any further queries please contact the Medicines Depot or Mrs. Annatjie Peters, Provincial TB Coordinator. The contact details are as follows: Medicines Depot (Attention Johan Meiring or Elzabe Oliveer) P. O. Box 7622 Bloemfontein 9300 Phone:0514303091 Fax: 051 4302208 Mrs. Annatjie Peters Provincial TB Coordinator P. O. Box 396 Kroonstad 9500 Phone: 0562122271 Cell: 082 8231050 We look forward to working with you in the coming months and sharing the results of the pilot with you. Kind regards, Ki) U+"A/C'" Dr RD Chapman General Manager: Health Support '7 jll- I '-CD ::s ",~,.""..(""""",~, , .... 'J....•• '........~'" Departmcnt ol Health v Departcmt::nt van CC~c:'!'.dhcid " '=-.t!.~'pl'-iL\.~.Hophe lo Bo Botle , ......"';..,..,,_,,,... \O~'_... ........~.~.., •• General Manager - Health Support, Dr lW Chapman, • PO Box 227, Bloemfontein 9300 • Tcl: 051-4033431 Fax: 051-4098008 e-mail - chapmard@doh.ofs.gov.zlI • Room 505. Lebohang Building, St Andrews Street, Bloemfontein A36 ANNEX6 The selection process A37 HOW TO SELECT PATIENTS FOR INTERVIEWING AFTER CONSULTATION 1. From the fast track queue for ill patients: • Select every patient who answers "yes" to: "Do you have or had you had any difficult breathing and/or cough today or in the last 6 months?" • Exclude patients who are clearly too ill to complete an hour long interview. Clear examples of patients who are toll ill to participate are: o unconscious patients o patients who are not breathing o patients who are unable to talk o patients who are psychotic 2. From the general queue: • On arrival obtain the headcount from the previous day. If you are interviewing on a Monday use the headcount for the previous Thursday. • Use the tables on the next page to work out how often you should select a patient who answers "yes" to difficult breathing (DB) and/or cough (today or in the last 6 months) in the general queue. • Example: You determine that you should select every 3rd patient for interviewing. Ask every patient in the general queue about difficult breathin~ and/or cough (today or in the last 6 months). Ask every 3r patient who answers "yes" to meet the interviewing team after their consultation with the nurse today. A38 SELECTION OF PATIENTS FROM THE GENERAL QUEUE WITH 2 INTERVIEWERS Headcount from previous day Select .... Patients who answer (General queue) yes to DB / cough Up to 70 patients Every patient 71 - 140 patients Every second patient 141 - 200 patients Every third p_atient 201 - 270 patients Every fourth patient 271 - 340 patients Every fifth patient 341 - 41 0 patients Every sixth patient 411 - 480 patients Every seventh patient WITH 3 INTERVIEWERS 3. From the fast track TB queue • This will differ from clinic to clinic based on the number of patients attending for TB treatment at each clinic • You will receive specific instructions for each clinic. • Team leader to identify on what day of the week, most patients attend the TB service at that particular clinic. This day is to be set aside for interviewing TB patients and reaching your "TB target". Compiled by Lara Fairall A39 ANNEX7 Patient screening questionnaire- English version A40 Patient Initials: I I Date: I I Clinic: I I Interviewer code: I FREE STATE LUNG HEALTH SURVEY SCREENING QUESTIONNAIRE PATIENT DETAILS 3 ' Enter first name: • 4 : Enter surname: I I 5 Gender: ' Male I I Female j(Mark with an X) 6 ; Enter folder no: 7 I Re-enter folder no: ! i DOESTHE PATIENT QUALIFY FOR THE FULL INTERVIEW? 8 I What is your date of birth? If you don't know your date of birth, enter age at last birthday. \9 i Date: I I Month! • Year I ! --> 1987 of after? -) do not continue I 11 ! Age at last birthday: I i --> 14 years or younger? -. do not continue 12 Have you participated in this study before (full questionnaire ± 1 hour)? YES I ~ do not continue NO i _. go to the next question I Were you seen ONLY by a doctor today? 13 YES I ~ do not continueI ! NO iI I --> go to the next question ! i ! Were you seen by a nurse/nursing sister today? I 14 I YES I I -> go to the next question I NO I ..-. do not continue I i Do you have difficult breathing (tight chest, shortness of breath, wheeze) todáy? I 15 I YES I _, CONSENTi I! _., Skl.p to questi.on 17 : NO ! _, go to the next question ; 1 ,: Have you had difficult breathing (tight chest, shortness of breath, wheeze) in the last 6 months?! ! YES ! 16 _...CONSENTi i .....g. o to the next question : NCl--- ! _, go to the next question I i COMMENTS FROM EDITOR ! COMMENTS FROM DATA CAPTURER I Please correcUcomplete Fieldworker tiek ! Fieldworker tick • Please II Fieldworker tiek I Fieldworker tiek Capturer tick ithe following question (s) if completed: : if completed: : correcUcomplete the if comPlet~d: if completed: if completed: ! 1 following guestion (s) II ! I I !J I I I I I A41 Patient Initials: I Date: I Clinic: I I Interviewer code: Do you have a cough today? 17 YES I I -> go to the next question NO I .1 ......do not continue For how long have you been coughing? Choose one ootion and enter number. Days ...~ 19. Enter number: 18 Weeks ......19. Enter number: Months -+ 19. Enter number: Years -> 19. Enter number: 20 Interviewer: For how long has the patient been coughing? 6 days or less - go to the next question 7 days or more .....C. ONSENT if haven't already done so -> skip to question 22 21 Have you had another episode of cough like this one in the last 6 months? ..._----- YES .....CONSENT if haven't already ..~,go to the next question NO _" go to the next question 22 Interviewer: What is the respiratory rate? Count number of breaths over 1 full minute. Enter Respiratory Rate (breaths/min) I I 23 Interviewer: What is the respiratory rate? 29 breaths I minute or less ~ go to the next question 30 breaths I minute or more ~ CONSENT if haven't already -+ go to the next question 24 Interviewer: What is the patient's temperature? Take the temperature with the thermometer. Enter Temperature (in degrees Celsius) I I 25 Interviewer: Is the temperature 38 degrees Celsius or more? 37.9 Celsius or less -+ Patient consented already? .....c..ontinue with question 27 .... Patient not yet consented? -+ do not continue 38Cëlsius or more _, CONSENT if haven't already .., complete full questionnaire -. go to question 27 (top of page 3) COMMENTS FROM EDITOR COMMENTS FROM DATA CAPTURER Please correcVcomplete the Fieldworker tick If Fieldworker tick if PI~a~a correct/complete the FieldwOrker tick if Fieldworker tick if Capturer tick if followin~ ouestion(~) . completed completed; fOltowir19_9.uestion{~ comQleted: colTlQleted: completed: - A42 ANNEX8 Patient information and written consent form- English version A43 PATIENT INFORMATION AND WRITTEN CONSENT FORM - LHS Study Number: _ Patient's Initials: _ You are invited to participate in a Randomised Control Trial. Before you agree to take part you need to understand what it involves. Purpose of study Researchers from the UFS Community Health Department are studying patient's who present to primary health care clinics with a complaint of difficult breathing and/or cough. The reason for doing this study is to test better ways to diagnose and treat lung disorders. We will compare nurse diagnoses of respiratory diseases using PALSA intervention compared to a nurse without PALSA intervention. What are the possible benefits of participating in this study? The information that we obtain from the study will help us improve the diagnosis and treatment of respiratory disease by nurses at primary health care level. You will be entitled to a R60 worth of food upon your return to the clinic for a follow up visit 3 months from today. What are the possible drawbacks or discomforts in participating in this study? None since this is only a training intervention. Do I have to participate in this study? Your participation in this study is voluntary. Should you agree to participate, you are to sign this form. You are free to withdraw from the study at any stage and this will in no way affect your management. Likewise, should we feel that further participation in the study would not be in your best interest we will withdraw you from the study. What will happen to me if I participate? After being seen by a clinic nurse who will record information about your medical history and your current condition, you will be screened for whether you qualify for inclusion to the study and questionnaire. Thereafter, you will be escorted to another cubicle where you will be interviewed by a research assistant using an exit interview questionnaire. Information regarding your medical history and current condition will also be recorded. You will then be requested to return to the clinic 3 months from today for a follow up visit. Will the information remain confidential? Should you agree to participate in the study all your records will be viewed by the researchers only. Your information will not be viewed by any other persons or parties not involved in this study. All the information will be safely stored on a computer and at the study site. At no time will anyone be able to link the information stored on the computer to your name. 1.1 Contact details of the study staff Should you have any questions relating to this study, please contact any of the following members of our researchers. Name __ Phone Number _ Name __ Phone Number _ A44 1,.........•.•....•.•....••...•.•...•..•.••.•.•.•••..••..•..••••.•.••••..•••.•.•.•••••.••••.•••....••••• (Name of Patient in block letters) have read and understood all the information given to me about my participation in this study and I have been given the opportunity to discuss it and ask questions. I voluntarily agree to take part in this study and understand that I will receive a copy of this consent form. Signature of Patient Date 1.2 Printed name of Patient I have explained the nature and purpose of the study to the Patient named above. Signature of Principal Investigator or delegate Date 1.3 Printed name of Principal Investigator or delegate A45 ANNEX9 Reminder form A46 DEAR (lnsert name of patient) We would like to schedule a follow-up interview for 3 months' time to check-up on your progress and state of health. This interview will be similar to the one we have just completed, and we will ask you about your quality of life, regular medications and visits back to this clinic or other health care providers. The interview may be conducted here at the clinic or at your home, depending on what you and the interviewer agree to today. If you agree to meet at the clinic, bear in mind that it may be on a different day to your next check-up visit. If this is the case you will not be required to wait until after you have seen the nurse. Remember to bring along your regular medications so that we can record the details at this interview. At the follow-up interview you will receive a small food parcel in appreciation of your participation in this survey. Once again, thank you tor your participation today. DATJE OF FOLLOW-UP INTERVIEW: I DAY OF THE WEEK I DATE I MONTH !FOLLOW-UP AT •.•. (Choose one) THIS CLINIC Lj ENTER NAME OF CUNIC: .. AT PATIENT'S HOME L., A4? ANNEXIO First post-intervention survey interview questionnaire- English version A48 Interviewer code: ht chest, shortness of breath, wheeze Do you have difficult breathing (tight chest, shortness of breath, wheeze) today? 27 YES .- .-..-.--t-. I ----------"< skip lo question 29 - NO I ' go to Ihe next question Have you had difficult breathing (tight chest, shortness of breath, wheeze) in the last 6 months? 28 ____ o_YES NO For how long have you had or did you have difficult breathing (tight chest, shortness of breath, wheeze? ..f.hoQ~.~..one option a~2.~JlJ.~..!!um_~~~.:. _ _ __ __.____ ..__ . _ . Days -., 30. Enter number: ---_._._--------+-----_ .-.1--._---_ ._. ------_._-- ----------- 29 Weeks .. 30. Enter number: Monlhs . 30. Enler number: Years . 30. Enter number: 31 Does this difficult breathing trouble you continuously, so that your breathing is never quite right, or does it trouble '''~~~f~ri~~~~!y ':~tal~ay'~ g~ts <:()rnPI~rIY betterr . - ..- . Does this difficulty breathing trouble you only when walking fast on the flat or uphill or also when resting? 32 ....9.!!!Y. ..---····--·-··--· ..-··-..·-...-.··..··.·.··..·--T..·-··..·-..-··-r·.·.------·-··-····· .·.·.·-.··.·..·.·.··-···-···when walking fast I uphill I When restlnq (sittinq etc.) I I Do you experience sharp chest pain on breathing in deeply with this current illness? 33 .\' .. . . -y!=..§ . NO I·· .. Does your che·s·t ··w-.h·.·e··e-z-·e_(·m·a·k-e-.a=w=hi-s-tli~ng-=s-o-uFnd=) ~w-hle-n-.·-.y·-o·u··b·re_a·th34 -e·-with you.-.r .·c.u-r-rent illn-e.s_s-?----..- _ ---.-._... YES NO COMMENTS FROM EDITOR COMMENTS FROM DATA CAPTURER Please cO(f'f)ciiëOlltpiëïëltte··------""'F::-,.7,dw:--o,'-ke·-,.b""c""k;7,'--r-::Fi'""'eI7ctw-07,k-.,''''ticl<''''-';-if·---t-'p"-la:-::as=.C::co=,=,.::'-cu:::co=m:::pIWaI-=-. "'lhe::--"'-;F~ie-;:;'~w=o::::;rI<:::'e,:-:IIC:;'ck:-:if;- -.,.-;F:::ie-;:;Id\=yo::::;rI skip to question 58 Select a category: 57 1 - 2 times per month I I 1 - 2 times per week I I Most days I I Has your chest problem interfered with your usual activities (e.g. work, study, housework, family or leisure activities) in the last month? 58 YES I . I ~ go to the next question NO I I -> skip to question 60 (top of page 7 ) Select a category: ... 59 1 - 2 times per week I I 1 - 2 times per month I I Most days I I COMMENTS FROM EDITOR COMMENTS FROM DATA CAPTURER Please eerreescomplete the Fiel\:lworker lick if Fieldwofker !lek if P&ease ccrrecscercete the Fieldwonc:er lick if Fialdworker lick if Capturer tick if followinR Queslion (5) completed: comoleted: following guestlon ~_. completed: cometetee. completed: -- 0' I -- ._-_._._--_ --_.__._--_ . - I A55 71. Read: Rest imaginable To help people say how good or bad a health state is, we have drawn a state of health scale (rather like a thermometer) on which the best state you can imagine 100 is marked 100 and the worst state you can imagine is marked O. We would like you to indicate on this scale, in your opinion, how good or bad your own health has been in the last month. Please do this by drawing a line from the box below to whichever point on the scale indicates how good or bad your state of health has been in the last month. Your own state :: of health in the last month o Worst imuginahl« SW!!: of henhh COMMENTS FROM EDITOR COMMENTS FROM DATA CAPTURER Please ccnecsccnoete the Field\."of'ker trek rt --- 7iëidWOrk'3l tick it Please correcëccmpete the Fieldworkef trek if rtek:fworker lick if Capturer hek if fonowing question !&____ . cam toted: conlrle~ ___ ,.~9Utlstion (s) •._ completed: - completed: completed: A56 Patient Initials: Interviewer code: 72 Have you ever smoked? I YES I I _, go to the next question NO I I _, skip to question 91 (top of page 12) I 73 Do you smoke currently? 1Y-ES--------- I I - go to the next question NO I I --,skip to question 82(this page) On average how many of the following items do you smoke per day? I 74 Mark appropriate boxes and enter average number smoked per day. Check all that apply. ; to Shop-bought cigarettes - 74. Enter no. smoked per day: 76 Hand-rolled cigarettes - 75. Enter no. smoked per day: Pipefuls of tobacco -, 76. Enter no. smoked per day: When did you start smoking regularly (at least one cigarette I pipe per day)? Interviewer: You may enter the i:lfie OR the year: 77 AGE I I --> 78. Enter é1_g_e: YEAR I I _, 79. Enter year: Did the nurse who saw you today advise you to reduce or quit smoking? 80 YES I I NO I I Which of the following best describes your thoughts about stopping smoking now? Interviewer: Read all 3 statements to patient and ask them to choose one. 81 I will stop smoking - skip to question 91 (top of page 12) I plan to stop smoking but not now - skip to question 91 (top of page 12) I do not plan to stop smoking soon -> skip to question 91 ( top of page 12) When did you stop smoking? Interviewer: You may enter aqe OR year: 82 AGE I I ---;83. Enter age: YEAR I I ~ 84. Enter year: , When did you start smoking regularly (at least one cigarette I pipe per day)? Interviewer: You may enter the age OR the year: 85 -A-G_E .- I I -., 86. Enter age: YEAR I I _,.87. Enter year: On average how many of the following items did you smoke per day? 88 Mark appropriate boxes and enter average number smoked per day. Check all that am>h', to Shop-bought cigarettes -> 88. Enter no. smoked per day: 90 Hand-rolled cigarettes -. 89. Enter no. smoked per day: Pipefuls of tobacco -. 90. Enter no. smoked per day: I COMMENTS FROM EDITOR COMMENTS FROM DATA CAPTURER Fielctworker tick if FielcM.'Orker ~ick it :~:~~~~~~~~~~~athee Please ccnecvccmpete the Fieldworker lick if Fleloworker lick if Capturer tick jfcompleted: completed: following question (5) competed completed" completed: 1-----_._. _._ I 1------- - --------_ 1---'--- A5? Interviewer code: Read: We would like to ask some questions about the treatment you received at the clinic TODAY. The following questions all ask about treatment and tests done TODAY, on the same day as this interview. We do not want information about investigations completed previously for the same illness or for other illnesses. For example we do not want to know about blood tests taken 6 months ago, only those taken today. 92 What was the reason for coming to the clinic today? Interviewer: Check all that apply. Mark boxes with an X. Check-up for diabetes ('suqar") Check-up for a respiratory problem Check-up for other problem First visit for a respiratory problem First visit for other problem Other -+ 93. Specify: 94 Did the nurse who saw you today tell you what is wrong with you? YES J _I -'0 go to the next question NO I I ~'skip to 096 What did she tell you? Interviewer: Probe with examples like cold, 'flu asthma. TB, high blood etc. Enter resQonse below: I 95 Old the nurse who you saw today collect any phlegm I sputum samples for testing? Interviewer: Show patient examples of sputum iars in visual aid. 96 YES I I -+ 97. How many did she collect? NO J I Did the nurse who you saw today ask you to collect any phlegm I sputum samples at home? \ Interviewer: Show patient examples of sputum jars in visual aid. 98 _.-YES I I ~'98. How many did she ask you to collect? NO I I Did the nurse who saw you today take any blood for tests? 99 YES I I NO I I COMMENTS FROM EDITOR COMMENTS FROM DATA CAPTURER Please correctrcompiete the Fieldwotker tick il Fieldworker lick if Please correct/complete the Fieldworker lick if Field\vOfker lick if Capturer lick if following question (s) completed: completed: following question (s} completed: completed: completed: r---.----.--.- _.- i----.-..-..-.----.-----.- .... ; AS8 Patient Initials: Interviewer: Show patient photo's of inhalers in visual aid (pages 28 and 29). First ask patient to identify inhalers they received to take home today. Complete the tables below. Then ask them to identify the inhalers they usually use af home. Complete the second set of tables below. 100 Did you receive an inhaler to take home today? YES I I ~ complete the following 2 tables (Reliever & Preventer inhalers) NO I I ~ skip to question 116 (this page) RELIEVER INHALERS RECEIVED TODAY (Interviewer: Check all that apply) 1--- YES NO 101 Fenoterol (Berotec) -, 102. Does this inhaler improve your difficult breathing minutes after usill9_it? 103 Fenoterolllpratropium (Duovent) -> 104. Does this inhaler improve your difficult breathing minutes after usill9_it? 105 Ipratropium (Atrovent) ~ 106. Does this inhaler improve your difficult - breathing minutes after usill9_it? 107 Salbutamol (Asthavent) -' 108. Does this inhaler improve your difficult breathing minutes after usill9_it? 109 Salbutamolllpratropium (Combivent) _...110. Does this inhaler improve your difficult breathina minutes after using it? 111 Salmeterol (Serevent) -> 112. Does this inhaler improve your difficult breathing minutes after using it? PREVENTER INHALERS RECEIVED TODAY (Interviewer: Choose oriel No. of times to be taken each day No. of puffs to be taken eachtime 113 Budesonide 100 114 115 113 Budesonide 200 114 115 113 Budesonide (don't know the dose) 114 115 If you didn't receive an inhaler today, do you usually use an inhaler? 116 YES I I -> complete the following 2 tables (Reliever & Preventer inhalers) NO I I -, skip to question 132 (top of page 14) RELIEVER INHALERS USUALL Y USED AT HOME (Interviewer: Check all that apply) YES NO 117 Fenoterol (Berotec) -~ 118. Does this inhaler improve your difficult f-- 1-.---- breathing minutes after usill9_it? 119 Fenoterolllpratropium (Duovent) --i 120. Does this inhaler improve your difficult breathillg minutes after usill9_it? 121 Ipratropium (Atrovent) ~ 122. Does this inhaler improve your difficult - -. breathing minutes after using it? 123 Salbutamol (Asthavent) -> 124. Does this inhaler improve your difficult breathing minutes after using it? 125 Salbutamolllpratropium (Combivent) --> 126. Does this inhaler improve your difficult breathing minutes after using it? 127 Salmeterol (Serevent) -> 128. Does this inhaler improve your difficult breathing minutes after using it? PREVENTER INHALERS USUALL Y USED AT HOME (Interviewer: Choose one) No. of times to be taken each day No. of puffs to be taken each .. time 129 I Budesonide 100 I 130 1 131 ...L 129 I Budesonide 200 I 130 I 131 J 129 I Budesonide (don'! know the dose) I 130 I 1311 COMMENTS FROM EDITOR COMMENTS FROM DATA CAPTURER Please ccrrectrcomple,ste) the Fieldworker lick if I FieldwOlker Ock if Please correcVcomptele the Fieldworker tiel< if Fieldworker lick if Capturer tick if'o!lawinQ cueeren com leted; completed: following Question (5) com leteet c0"le..leted. completed: I I A59 Interviewer: Show patient photo's of antibiotics in visual aid (pages 30 and 31). First ask patient to identify the antibiotics they received to take home today. Complete the tables below. Then ask them to identify the antibiotics they usual/y_use at home. Complete the second set of tables below.. 139 Did you receive an antibiotic to take home today? ~-?.-.--- ..-.....-.~...~.~~.~:•~-:~.-·..~-..·~.-.~..·r=·=·=···--r=:":~;~:~:~-~-~-i'-~O-nl-I~-;-~n-(~-ht-i:-bp-I:-~-:-~-ti-bi-o-tiCS---re-c-e--iv.-..e..-.d--'-t-o.-d- -a'-y-])' ANTIBIOTICS RECEIVED TODAY (Interviewer: Check all that apply) No. of times to be No of tablets/capsules No. of days to be taken each day lo be taken each time taken for ._.'.-..-._._-_._--:--==----,.------ -I---r--'---'--'- ..(~on of course) .._. 140 Amoxicillin 250mg capsules ___ (Betamax ?50L_. .. . + _ 141 142 143.--t--------- --.-..-.-..-.-...---".'-'-.-. 144 Amoxicillin 500mg capsules 145 146 147 __.__. _ ..(Betamox. 50QL_ .. _ --------.-.--I-----!----I---- ------- .-.---J-.--I------- 148 Amoxicillin/calvulanic acid tablets 149 150 '151 ....._.._. (BiO-AfT!.Q!~p'I_e_I!,~I:_ A60 Interviewer: Show patient photo's of other medication in visual aid (pages 32 and 33). First ask patient to identify other medication(s) they received to take home today. Complete the table below. Then ask them to identify the other medicalion(s) they usually use at home. Complete the second table below .. 186 Besides the inhalers, prednisone and the antibiotics, did you receive any other medication to take home with you today? rY-E-S---.---------- _._. --------+ ----- J ~ complete the fOIlO-Mngtabl~-(Other medication received to~ ___ . NO I --, skip to question 188 (this page) OTHER MEDICATION(S) RECEIVED TODAY (Interviewer: Check all that apply) Acetic Acid Eardrops : ê~<::IQ!!1ethasone~as~§p..!.~y" _ r-£b!Q!p'h~niramine tablets (Allerg~ _ ~P.!l! tablets (Renitec) 187 ~_Exp~~orant coug,--,h~m,,-,i;_;cxt:.::uo.:re=--_--_-,,--I ~i'tatin suspension (Nystacidl Canstat) Oxymetazoli!le nasal spray'__(Dri.~i!_1t_:lL.._. '_" '_d' • _ Paracetamol tablets (Painaf!l..2!)____ _ _ Paracetamol/codeine tablets (Painamol Plus) Salbutamol tablëiS-(Vëntëïëy--·----·-- Theophylline tablets (Nuelin SA) Besides the inhalers, prednisone and the antibiotics, do you usually use any other medication at home on a regular 188 ~:b.-asis? .-..- ..-.-..---------------,- ---------------:-:-:,-----:---:-----:---:----- 'Në>- ---.-----]-------------:1---: ~~i~~~e~:::~i~~II~~~7t~~b~~ ~~ci:~~-~~dicatiO'~ usui3l!y_~s~~) OTHER MEDICATION(S) USUALL Y USED AT HOME (Interviewer: Check all that apply) ~-- -- -----._---- ~_._-_.._----~_._--_.._--_ .._------_. __ ._- Acetic Acid Eardrops "_0'0-_"-' ...... ,.--_.-._ ... .__ " .._--.- Beclomethasone Nasal SQ@Y. ~t!!.q!p-'h_~!~c:lmin_etablets (Allergex) ....__ ..._- ..- EnalaP.!l!.tablets (Renitec) ____..___ __ ,,_, -_-------_----_.- 189 ._Mist Ex~ctorant cough mixt~~ _______._ Nystatin sl,l~pension (Nystacidl Canstat) -- _Ox~metazoline nasal spray_(Q!ixin~l _____._ paracetamol tablets _(Painamol)_..______ ._...... Paracetamol/codeine tablets (Painamol -Plus) ----- •.._-_._- Salbutamoltablets i.Y~!1.!~z..~_L_.._. Theophylline tablets (Nuelin SA) COMMENTS FROM EDITOR COMMENTS FROM DATA CAPTURER f------------ .-.---- .----------.-f----.-.--------- ----·_--------------·----+-------1--·--·--- .-.-·--------------.-- r--------------- ~-----------+_--------~------------~----------+_--------~--------_4 A62 Patient Initials: Interviewer code: FOllOW-UP APPOINTMENT Did the nurse ask you to return for a follow-up appointment? 190 Interviewer: Check all that apply. Mark boxes with an X. On a specific date If you feel worse If you don't get better When you run out of medication Before you run out of medication No instructions REFERRALS Did the nurse who saw you today refer you to a doctor? 191 YES I I -+ go to the next question NO I I -+ skip to question 193 (top of page 18) Did the nurse refer you to a doctor ... Interviewer: Choose one. Mark appropriate box with an X. in a hospital casualty or ward 192 at this clinic to be seen today at this clinic for another day in a hospital outpatient department J COMMENTS FROM EDITOR COMMENTS FROM DATA CAPTURER Pktase correCVcomptete lhe Fieldworker lick jf Fieldworker liel( if Please correctlcomplete the F iek:tworker tick if Fiekfworkel tick (f Capturer tick if following queSlion(!l. completed: completed: following Question (5) completed: completeo: completed: J A63 Patient Initials: I IDate: I IClinic: I I Interviewer code: I INCOME AND CHANGES DUE TO ILLNESS Read: We would like to understand more about your visits to this clinic or any other health care provider for your current illness. If you have been ill for some time we would only like you to tell us about any visits or admissions in the last 3 months. We wish to understand what your current illness is costing you and your household, in terms of fees paid to health care providers, travel costs and lost earnings. VISITS TO THIS CLINIC IN THE LAST 3 MONTHS Read: We will start by going through your visits to THIS clinic in the last 3 months. We will use your folder to help you remember when you came to this clinic in the last 3 months. 193 Have you attended this ctinic in the tast 3 months? Intervi~~~!~ .Q()_lJ~Le_:S:-I}_~-t;:~.!!lJ?l'lfQfmati~thfe folder __ .... _ .. -_"_--- _ ........ .. _ ...•..- ._ ..-._----_ YES J -'-.' go to the next question -NO - ----- j -> skip to question 262 (top of pagë~--------·-- 194 Are you currently attending this clinic for TB treatment? Choose one (Mark with an X) -:~:r---'--I~~: ._.- _._--------------~f-- -----.~- ~~~----~:---:~~-- ~ i~Ot~h:u::;i~~u1e;;i~:~i: ~~::) 195 When did you start your TB treatment at this ctinic? Interv~~~~_~~_.p..9_t!F_t"!!-~~.9W y'ou their TB treatment card Date: I Month --r--·---·-·-------·l·-year--··-----·--..J---------·-·--··-·-'--.-J 196 How many times a week do or did you attend the clinic for TB treatment? _Interviewer: Choose one (Mark with an Xl . .. ..._. .. . ._ -O_nce._--------------+---- Twice Three times Four times Five times 197 Do you have a patient-held or facility-held record with you? :'_~~S ---------~=~=--.-f~=---_:J~:f~:~=:~:e:s~ïheëndOrïhis-pag~~~·=·~~~~:·:====~~-= 198 Interviewer: Are you able to locate the folder? ....... __- YES NO .·1·-··~·-···:···-~F~~:~~l1!:r~fi~f:~{r~-f~~i:;~:t~=:r-~·:~{=:··::·...=._=---_-......_._::---- INSTRUCTIONS A (details of clinic visits using folder as a prompt): Read: I will now go through each visit documented in your clinic folder for the last 3 months in order to refresh your memory. If you are a TB patient I will ask you about visits other than visits to collect your TB medication. Interviewer: Open folder and locate all entries for the last 3 months. Exclude return visits for TB medication. Start with the earliest entry. Read the date of the visit and if clearly documented, the reason for attendance. Establish that the patient recalls this visit and enter date. INSTRUCTIONS B (details of clinic visits without folder as a prompt) Read: I would like you to tell me about all visits to this clinic in the last 3 months since ..... (Interviewer: provide date e.g. start of February as reference point for the patient). If you are a TB patient I will only ask you about visits other than those to collect TB medication. COMMENTS FROM EDITOR COMMENTS FROM DATA CAPTURER Please ccrrecscompiete Ihc:----,-"'Fie::-:kJw=o':;7.ke:::-' "'tic'"k"il --'-"'Fie::-:'dw=ori<'::.:::-' t"'ic""kif ----t-npklea=.-=-. c=o:::"e=c;;:Vc=on:::'p:;:,e:::te:-;;the:::-~F""ie:;:ldw;:::o::-:'k;;t:;::e;i:c:-k:"' 'if;----r'F""ie'-'Irlw""ork=e,:-7tick="'if ---'""'c""a""pt-:ure""'-:;-tic:-;:-k"",,·---l foUowinQ Queslion (r.) completed: com leted: followinq _C_ JlI9stion (~l_ I-c:~P..!.~~~~_~_.._._...__ +.::c;:::o''''nP:.:::llec:;:ted=: l_'''co:::.:mJ::pl,::.:ete::.-:;d-:;_-: -I --.-j--------I--.---------------- -------- --------t------- ---.--.--.----.---------.---.--t------+-----j A64 199 Date of Visit 1 to this clinic in last 3 months Date of Visit 2 to this clinic in last 3 months 200 204 I Date: I I Monlh: :=c-_~=_-~.---rD-ale:--I----I·Mon-th: --I "_"2Cï1""-r=~as the reason for attendance for clinic visit 1? 205 What was Ihe reason for attendance for clinic-visit-2?~~ Interviewer: Check all that acolv. _.._________ Interviewer: Check all that apply. ______ .___ Check-up f-o-r_hig.h_b-lo-o-d-p-re-s-su-r-e- - --C-heck-up for high blood pressure - _.- .. --.--_. _- ..- Check-up for diabetes ("sugar") Check-up for diabetes ("sugar") Check-up for a respiratory problem - Check-up for a respiratory problemCheëk-Uj)iëii Other- problerrï . . - .. . Check-up for other problem --.__. First visit for a respiratory problem F--ir-s-t--v_is.it_.fo_r-a respiratory proble_m.- ...._ .. "-- .•._'.- _.'._"_. ~Fi~rst~vis~it f~or!otehear ~pro~ble:m~~~~;-L.:~:--:-._-~-]-·-·.~_.~~.~:= First visit for other problemOther (please specify): ·-T200·--- --.- ...... _ .._ .._ .._ ..._-_ ......-. "._._._.- ... ..,- ...._-- .,- '.-- . ..._----- 203 Interviewer: Enter data for another clinic visit? _ 207 ..··"interviewer: Enter data for·an -YES --T-:::: ....go to question 204 (next block) -Y-E=S-=--~-Tgo~to-q-ue-s-tio·n--oÏ_tier··cl·in·ic-·--;'is·it-?208 (next block) ----·_- Në) ..._.:.s,kip to question 231 (top of page 21) - NO --" skip to question 231 (top of page 21) 212 Date of Visit 4 to this clinic in last 3 months " ___~~~~Sit I~to t~is clini;~~:~~~.~~~~~~ '~--.._.~-- Date: ---T ~_:=--=r_~~-·::__~ ·2-09----W-h1at-w-as--th-e-re-as-o_n ·fo_r a-tte-n-da----_· .._-----;:--:-;:;-nce for clinic visit 3? 213 What was the reason for attendance for clinic visit 4? ___ Interviewer: Check all that a~_[l!Y_. Interviewer: Check all tha.t ap1!!~._Check-uI? for .!!)gh blood pressur~ ..__. ._- ..gheck~p for _blghblo()d pressui.~_. __.____. _S;heck-u[l for diabetes ("sugar")___ r---- Check-uI:! for diabetes {"sugar") _..__ ._..__ 1--_. Check-up for a respiratory problem -- _gheck-.l!J>for a resJ>iratóry_J>roblem _Ql_eck-u[l fOr:_9ther[lroble~ __ ._ .. Check-up for other problem ----- First visit for a respiratory problem .Brg visit for a res[lk~!Q.ry.~~I!)_ __ ~=== ..- First_yisit for other [lroble~ ____ _.- First visit for other problem ---- ---_._ ..__ .._--- _Other_(please sl:!ecifYL [ 210 . --_ ... _ ..• ..9t!_l~_(plea~~_s[lecifY1. ____..__.__ .m4--··· - ---._--_ .._ .. - .._------- 211 Interview1e.·r·:' Enter d·ata for another clinic visit? 215 _Interviewl!;...!~nter. data ~ora~2J.~egri!:!!£. visit? ___ .YES .. go lo question 212 (nexl block) ---.-.- .._..-..-.-. YES - .• go to question 216 (next ~É~~ _.__.__._ NO -., skip to question 231 (top of page 21) NO I ....skip to question 231 (top of page 21) COMMENTS FROM EDITOR .HiC:=O::=M",M=E=-N::;T:=:S::,:F,;.:R=O~M,=,D",A-,-T:.!.A~C=rA.;;.P~T~U~R",E:-;R;:;:..,,"-_----ro==o=:=;:-;;,.---------r~-,-----,-,...,,----I Pleaseccrrecëconpete the F'ieldworker tiek if Fieldwt'Jrkerlick jf Please ccrtectzcormlete the Fioldwor1';e::a =s.!!';,'"o,=,.,:';""'com==rple:;:,.:'i,'Ehe:'='irF"'Ie:T.'dicwo=="';;:.:-;,,"';ck"W""--'--'FIe=trt=wor1<=.;'""'k::;:;k"-'j·i-ëase correct/complate the _:..: rf.;etdworker !ick-if ..····-""r.,::i:irtw=ork;;:e:O' ';:;~k;-;i',...--,---;C-=3P="-:'''':::-, ;;:,t;:"". rt..--l (ollowing que5lion_(~)_ com letëc. corn letad: follOwing quostion s) corn !clod: corn IDled: completed: -.-------- --------. ------- ...-.-..-.-.---.-f-------+----.-.-,-- ----.-.-..--.--. -.----.----.-----t-.-----+--------+-------'---, 1-------- --------j-----j r----------_r--------~--------+---------------r_-------,_----_r--------- A66 Patient Initials: I IDate: 1Clinic: 1 linterviewer code: 1 VISITS TO THIS CLINIC IN THE LAST 3 MONTHS cont'd Interviewer: Show patient transport photo's in visual aid_{Q_age34}. 231 How do you usually travel to this clinic? Use visual aid to select a mode of transport. Choose one (Mark box with an Xl Walk Bicycle Animal (e.g. donkey) Taxi 232 -'233. Enter amount paid for return fare to clinic by taxi: R: Bus 234 -'235. Enter amount_j)élid for return fare to clinic ~ bus: R: Train 236 -->237. Enter amount paid for return fare to clinic by train: R: Private motor vehicle Ambulance 238 ->240. Tariff paid? Enter amount: (enter 0 if no tariff paid) R: Other 241 How long does it usually take you to travel to the clinic and back home again (travel time + time spent at clinic)? Choose one (Mark box with an X) Overnight -+243. Enter rands spent on accommodation R: -+245. Enter rands spent on food and drink R: Between 2 and 12 hrs Less than 2 hours 246 Does someone usually accompany/escort you to the clinic? YES -->go to the next question NO -+ skip to question 262 (top of page 22) 247 What is the employment status of your usual companion/escort? Choose one (Mark box with an X) Employed 248 __.go to question 249 (next block) Self-employed 248 -->go to question 249 (next block) Unemployed StudenUScholar 258 ->259. Days unable to attend schooll college because of accO~allïll'lQ_ï_ou to the clinic: Looking for work 260 ->261. Days unable to look for work because of accomoanvlna you to the clinic: Recelvlnq GranUPension : . Other '__::' 249 On what basis is your companion/escort employed? Choose one (Mark box with an Xl Casual 250 ->251. Enter average no. of days worked per week -+252. Enter average amount brought home per day (after deductions e.q, tax) -->257. Enter no. of days unable to work to accompany you to the clinic Weekly 253 ->254. Enter average amount brought home per week (after deductions e.g. lax) ->257. Enter no. of days unable to work to accompany you to the clinic Monthly 255 ->256. Enter average amount brought home per month (after deductions e.q, tax) ->257. Enter no. of days unable to work to accompany you to the clinic COMMENTS FROM EDITOR COMMENTS FROM DATA CAPTURER Please correct/complete the Fieldworker lick if Fieldworker tick it Please correct/complete the Fieldworker lick if Fieldworket' lick if Capturer tick if following Question (~) completed: completed: t\>llowjrlg Que.tion (S) completed: completed: co~ted: A67 Patient Initials: , , Date: , , Clinic: , 'Interviewer code: , VISITS TO OTHER HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS IN THE LAST 3 MONTHS Show patient: Pictures of other health care providers on visual aid Read: We also wish to know whether you have been to any other health care provider besides this clinic in the last 3 months. Other health care providers include hospitals (public, private, mine), other primary care clinics besides this one, private doctors, traditional healers etc. We would like to know about al/ visits to other health care providers, whether you attended as an outpatient or were admitted. In particular, we wish to know what these visits to other health care providers are costing you and your household, in terms of fees paid to other health care providers, travel costs and lost earnings. 262 Have you been to another health care provider besides this clinic in the last 3 months? ~~~s~_~~-~_~_..·_.~.._=._:~.__~_.~_=._-.~-_-. .., complete questions 263 - 303 (this pag~ and_.~'!.neext pagel._ ......_ ... --, skip to question 46B (lop of page 32) VISIT 1 to other health care provider in the last 3 months: questions 263 - 303 263 When did you visit another health care provider other than this clinic in the last 3 months? Choose one (Mark with an X) -1~-'--1--" I Feb I MarchI Augusl l- I Sept .i~~I·==~·l~J-MI·N~-a~ï--·~'r·'-_---....JJiJnë''''''-r-- -_.ov I I Dec I 264 On this occasion, which of the following health care providers did you visit? Use visual aid lPJ!ge3~} lo select a health ~~J!!:QYider. Choose one (Mark box with an JC) ~H. ospit.a._l -(P-_ub._lic--o_r .P_r_iv...a. te or Mine) ,265. Enter name of hospital:__ - ---------------- Other PHC Clinic _ .._ ..--_. ---_ .. _._-------_ ... -M-o-bi-le-C-lin-ic--_._------ ------ Workplace I Min-e--C-l_in.ic_._._._~-_..._- _._._-_ ..- .P-r-iv_at-e-D-o-c-t-o-r ----- Traditional Healer .- .._-_.__ ._--- ------ Pha._rm--a-c-y-_I C- __ --h-e-mist Other 266 What was the reason for this visit? Check all that al!l2lï. Mark boxes with X. - -----_._--_._.- --' _ ...•.".- -_ .._-_.__ ..__ ...._--_._-------.- Check-up for high blood pressure .._-_ ..- ..._ ... .... _ ... ._- -Check-up for diabetes ('sligar") .. _ ....__ .._ .....• C-heck-upfOr;:Ï·rës-piraiOr-y-probiëiïl··- . chëëïï:up for other problem '-First visit for._a_r-e_ .s.._p-ir-a-t-o_ry-_pr..o...b.•. l_e.m-.-. AO. _____ __ "_0" .......- First visil for other problem Other'--- - ... ----- .. ------.-.--------.--- 1----- ---------_._------_._-- ~·267. Specify: 26B Did you stay overnight at this health care provider? -_.._----_- ...... _._._---_._ .... _ .._----_ ..._- YES ----- --'269. Enter number of nights: -- NO 270 Did the health care provider charge you for that visit! admission (consultation fee + medication)? ~~~S - --.---.-- ..--.-----.-------__:F .-'T .-"271.' How much? (consultation fee + m~dic~on~: --R'---- ..-------- COMMENTS FROM EDITOR COMMENTS FROM DATA CAPTURER Please cceecsccopete Ihe - Field\vorkcf lick if FielctNol1w'l!J Q\JeS'ion (s) compleloO' ccmeerco. completed .. ____ r--------- .-.-.--..-.-.-..-..-.-...-. .._----- -_ r-------- r-.---- ------ f---- ----- 1---. '_- .. -_ .._-----_._- 1---------- 1---,--, -- A68 Patient Initials: I IDate: IClinic: I I Interviewer code: I 272 How did you travel to this health care provider for that visit / admission? Use visual aid to select a mode of transport. Choose one (Mark box with an Xl Walk Bicvcle Animal (e.Q. donkev) Taxi 273 ->274. Enter amount paid for retum fare to HCP by taxi: R: Bus 275 ....2. 76. Enter amount paid for retum fare to HCP by bus: R: Train 277 --278. Enter amount paid for return fare to HCP train: R: Private motor vehicle Ambulance 279 ->281. Tariff paid? Enter amount: (enter 0 if no tariff paid) R: Other 282 How long did it take you to visit the HCP from the time you left home until the time you got back home again (travel time + time spent at HCP)? Choose one (Mark box with an Xl Overnight ··.·..284. Enter rands spent on accommodation R: ....2. 86. Enter rands spent on food and drink IR: Between 2 and 12 hrs Less than 2 hours 287 Did someone accompany you to the health care provider? YES I -> go to the next question NO -> skip to question 303 (at bottom of page) 288 What is the .employment status of your companion? Choose one (Mark box with an Xl Employed 289 .....go to question 290 (next blocl1 Self-employed 289 .....go to question 290 (next block) unemotoved Student/Learner 299 -300. Days unable to attend schooV college because of accompanvinq vou to HCP: Looking for work 301 ·.·..3. 02. Days unable to look for work because of accompanying vou to HCP: Receivino Grant/Pension Other 290 On what basis is your companion/escort employed? Choose one (Mark box with an) Casual 291 _,292. Enter average no. of days worked per week -·293. Enter average amount brought home per day (after deductions. e.c. tax) -298. Enter no. of days unable to work to accompany you to the HCP Weekly 294 -295. Enter average amount brought home per week (after deductions e.g. tax) ·-'298. Enter no. of days unable to work to accompany you to the HCP Monthly 296 _,297. Enter average amount brought home per month (after deductions e.o, tax) -+298. Enler no. of days unable lo work to accompany you to the HCP 303 Is there another visit in the last 3 months to a health care provider other than this clinic which we have not discussed? !I YES I ....g.o to the next question (lop of page 23) NO .....skip to question 468 (top of page 32) COMMENTS FROM EDITOR COMMENTS FROM DATA CAPTURER Please COI'i'ectlcomplele the Fieldwortter liCk if Fieldworker tick if Please correcVcomplete the FieldWorker tick if Fieldwo","er lick il Capturer tick if fonowlnQ eoeenen (s) completed: completed: fOllowing Question 5 completed: completed: com_2leled: A69 VISIT 2 to other health care provider in the last 3 months:_questions 304 - 344 304 When did you visit another health care provider other than this clinic in the last 3 months? Choose alle (Mark with an X) .~~~: : :~~ust : : ~:~~h : ~~;il: I ~:~..--, -. -..~~=····E::~= 305 On this occasion, which of the following health care providers did you visit? Use visual aid (page 35) to select a health care provider. ChQose alle (Mark box with an~. __ ._ ...__ .... .. .__ Hospital (Public or Private or Mine) ~·306. Enter name of hospital: Other PHC Clinic'·'· -. - - ..- - --- -.. ' -- -..---'." - -- -------- . Mobile Clinic W-o-rk'-pl-a-ce--I M_in.e_C-li_nic._-_._--- --- Private Doctor Traditional Healer Pharmacy I Chemist I--c---- . Other 307 What was the reason for this visit? .Ch~ck §l_ll_!ha.~tpp.ly;M§l.~.~.b..C>.)(E;!.!i.~!!~_~: _.. " _._ _ __ . _. .__ ._. ._ . Check-up for high blood pressure C._h-e-c-k--up--for diabetes ('sugar") . .-.---.._---- ---_ . Check ..up for a respiratory problem Check-up for ëiïi1ërprobïêiri . First visit for other problem _._._ ..._---_._._ .._ ..__ ..__ Other "308. Specify: 309 Did you stay overnight at this health care provider? .~- -'310. Enter number of nights: NO ------~~--------------- 311 .~D.id~the~.~h.e.a~lth.c=~are.~prov~ide.r:-=~cha-.r-g~e.~.yo~=u fror·~tha~t..v=isit=! admission (consultation fee + medication)?: I~.::::1.~i.·~I:!~~r:'1..~~?j~~~u~ation ..!~~_.m+edical_i?n}: ~ __. _ .~. ~-··-·· COMMENTS FROM EDITOR COMMENTS FROM DATA CAPTURER Please correctzcompjetethe "-~'FTOIdWOfkP.r'ïlër;;- __..- Fië-Jd\~ë~kë;:ïiëk:W--"--'... Pease eorrecucomciere the Freldworkl;!rlick il .FioJdworker lick il Capture, lick if _!9!~~!:~n..~~~~.i.i:~>.!L~ ._.. _t2C!!!.!P_~~':.~..:_._. __ . r-,,£ompluled: followrn_9_questlO(Sn). __ cornplel~: ~lated: .._._. . completed: =--=-----------.-..·--·.·~.·:·=.-·F- ~- .--r---.-----t------f------j-----j '-1 A70 Patient Initials: .1 IDate: IClinic: I I Interviewer code: I 313 How did you travel to this health care provider for that visit I admission? Use visual aid to select a mode of transport. Choose one (Mark box with an Xl Walk Bicycle Animat te.c. donkey) Taxi 314 ~315. Enter amount paid for return fare to HCP by taxi: R: Bus 316 -317. Enter amount paid for return fare to HCP by bus: R: Train 318 ~319. Enter amount paid for return fare to HCP train: R: Private motor vehicle Ambulance 320 -'322. Tariff paid? Enter amount: (enter 0 if no tariff paid) R: Other 323 How long did it take you to visit the HCP from the time you left home until the time you got back home again (travel time + time spent at HCP)? Choose one (Mark box with an X) Overnight ~325. Enter rands spent on accommodation IR: -'327. Enter rands spent on food and drink R: Between 2 and 12 hrs Less than 2 hours 328 Did someone accomcanv yOUto the health care_provider? YES _, go to the next question NO --+ skip to question 344 (at bottom of page) 329 What is the employment status of your companion/escort? Choose one (Mark box with an X) , Employed 330 - go to question 331 (next block) -~ Self-employed 330 _, go to question 331 (next block) ! Unemployed StudenVLearner 339 -341. Days unable to attend schaall college because of accomjJanyinQvou to HCP: Looking for work 342 ->343. Days unable to look for work because of accomoanvinu vou to HCP: Receiving GranVPension Other 331 On what basis is your companion/escort employed? Choose one (Mark box with an )I Casual 332 -333. Enter average no. of days worked per week -'334. Enter average amount brought home per day (after deductions e.q, tax) ~339. Enter no. of days unable to work to accompany you to the HCP Weekly 335 -336. Enter average amount brought home per week (after deductions e.q. tax). -~339. Enter no. of days unable to work to accompany you to the HCP Monthly 337 ->338. Enter average amount brought home per month (after deductions e.g. tax) -339. Enter no. of days unable to work to accompany you to the HCP 344 Is there another visit in the last 3 months to a health care provider other than this clinic which we have not II discussed? i YES -go to the nexl question (top of page 26) NO I -> skip to question 468 (top of page 32) COMMENTS FROM EDITOR COMMENTS FR Please correct/complete the Fieldworker lick if Fielctworker lick if followino Question s comoleled: comejerert :=~~~~:~: OmMth~DeA~TeAtCeAPTURERFietdworker tick if Fieldworker tick if Capturer tick ifcomoleled: comolet8d: completed: - A71 VISIT 3 to other health care provider in the last 3 months: _guestions 345 - 385 345 When did you visit another health care provider other than this clinic in the last 3 months? .Choose one (Mark with an X) ~-~- I Feb I I March +-------. J I .-- --TJuly I I ~:I 1 I ~i~-~~..=...-.=....-t..--- ..-. +~~e_August ..J-ISem 346 On this occasion, which of the following health care providers did you visit? Use visual aid (page 35) to select a health care provider. Choose one (MélEkbox with an ~ ----_._ -H--o--s_p.ital (Public or Private or Mine) -,,347. --_.------- --.--_._-- ------_ E_n.-t.er name of hospital:.. ...__ ...._--_._._._--._--- O,--_ther PHC Clinic.. ------- .... _ .. _- '_ . -"'_'_- .. _, Mobile Clinic _._.0.0-_0- .. ._ .... ._--->,- ~W-or-kp-la_ce .I_Min-e-C-lin-ic. Private Doctor -_' ___ -0_-'-' . -_. _ .... _-_._-- -Tr-ad_itiona..l_.H_e_a.l_e_ .r..... - -•...__----- Pharmacy I Chemist ___ '-'0 •• ....-._-_ ....._ .._--_.- Other 348 What was the reason for this visit? ..9leck_~I!that a~~I~. Mark boxes with X,______.___._ .._.__ ._._ ..._.-._,-_- ..._ ..._-_._- Check-up for high blood pre.s_sure ------------ - - .- -_ .... _ .._._ Check-up for diabetes ('sugar") Check-up for a respiratory 'probleriï-'-' ~Check-u_p_fo.-r._o.t_h..e._r...._p-r-o_bl_em.. First visit for a respiratory problem -'. First visit forOthe..r_p--r-o_b...l.e_m-_ ..._-_ ... ---_ --- ,------ ..._. __ ...._--_ ......_-_.__ .-- Other ~·349. Specify: 350 Did you stay overnight at this health care provider? ~~S -------- -- ~-:~~=~._.=_r._--.=~_~E_n~~e~rnumber of nighis~~~:~-=__=~ __ 352 _D_id the health care--_pr.o_v.-id_e-r_ charge.._.-~._y-ou for that visitl admission (consultation fee + medication)?YES. -----_ ..__ .- .-._-__ .- ............ ---- --'353 . How much? (consultation fee + medication): R.'- NO COMMENTS FROM EDITOR COMMENTS FROM DATA CAPTURER Please ccnect'comptste the Flêldwor1l.er lick it Fieldworker lick If ~=;:;~~~o Fioldworkcr lick if Fieldworker lick if CapllaDr lick ilfollowing qucsncn (S)' comp!cted: completed: the completed. complo1ed: r.omptotod: .- A72 Patient Initials: I IDate: (Clinic: I linterviewer code: I 354 How did you travel to this health care provider for that visit / admission? Use visual aid lo select a mode of transport. Choose one (Mark box with an Xl Walk Bicycle Animal (e.g. donkey) Taxi 355 ~356. Enter amount paid for return fare to HCP by taxi: R: Bus 357 ~358. Enter amount paid for return fare to HCP by bus: R: Train 359 ~360. Enter amount paid for return fare to HCP train: R: Private motor vehicle Ambulance 361 -+363. Tariff paid? Enter amount: (enter 0 if no tariff paid) R: Other 364 How long did it take you to visit the HCP from the time you left home until the time you got back home again (travel time + time spent at HCP)? Choose one (Mark box with an X) Overnight ~366. Enter rands spent on accommodation R: ~·368. Enter rands spent on food and drink R: Between 2 and 12 hrs Less than 2 hours 369 Did someone accompany you to the health care provider? YES ~ go to the next questen NO -+ skip to question 385 (at bottom of page) 370 What is the employment status of your companion/escort? Choose one (Mark box with an X) Employed 371 -+ go to question 372 (next block) Self-employed 371 -+ go to question 372 (next block) Unemployed StudenVLeamer 381 -'382. Days unable to altend school! college because of accompanying you to HCP: Looking for work 383 -~384. Days unable to look for work because of accompanying you to HCP: Receivin[l GranVPension Other 372 On what basis is your companion/escort employed? Choose one (Mark box with an )( Casual 373 -+374. Enter average no. of days worked per week -+375. Enter average amount brought home per day (after deductions e.a. lax) -+380. Enter no. of days unable to work to accompany you to the HCP Weekly 376 -+377. Enter average amount brought home per week .(after deductions e.a, tax) -+380. Enter no. of days unable to work to accompany you to _"---- the HCP Monthly 378 -379. Enter average amount brought home per month (after deductions e.q. tax) '-'380. Enter no. of days unable to work to accompany you to the HCP 385 Is there another visit in the last 3 months to a health care provider other than this clinic which we have not discussed? _. YES ->go to the next question (top page 28) NO -+ skip to question 468 (top of page 32) COMMENTS FROM EDITOR COMMENTS FROM DATA CAPTURER Please carred/complete the Fieldwcrter tick if Fieldworiter lick if Please correcllcomplale tho Fieldworkertickif Fioldworkor tick if Capturer lick if fOllowing (IIJ.Sllon_IS)_ compleled: compleled: following question (s) completed; completed: compIeled:------- -r--' A73 VISIT 4 to other health care provider in the last 3 months: questions 386 - 426 386 When did you visit another health care provider other than this clinic in the last 3 months? Choose one (Mark with an X) Jan I I Feb I I March I I April I I May I I June I July I I August I I Sept I Oct I I Nov 1 I Dec I 387 On this occasion, which of the following health care providers did you visit? Use visual aid (page 35) to select a health care provider. Choose one (Mark box with anX) Hospital (Public or Private or Mine) -'388. Enter name of hospital: Other PHC Clinic Mobile Clinic Workplace I Mine Clinic Private Doctor Traditional Healer Pharmacy I Chemist Other 389 What was the reason for this visit? Check all that apply. Mark boxes with X. Check-up for high blood pressure Check-up for diabetes ('sugar") Check-up for a respiratory problem Check-up for other problem First visit for a respiratory problem First visit for other problem ---- Other ~390. Specify: 391 Did you stay overnight at this health care provider? ---- YES -~392. Enter number of nights: NO 393 Did the health care provider charge you for that visit! admission (consultation fee + medication)? YES -- ->394. How much? (consultation fee + medication): R NO COMMENTS FROM EDITOR COMMENTS FROM DATA CAPTURER ro~:!~:Q=:"~~ta FieldwOf1(er lick if AeldwOfker lick if Please corecsccmcete the FieldwOl'k9r tick if Fieldwor1397. Enter amount paid for return fare to HCP by taxi: R: Bus 398 ~399. Enter amount paid for return fare to HCP by bus: R: Train 400 ~401. Enter amount paid for return fare to HCP train: R: Private motor vehicle Ambulance -- 402 ~404. Tariff paid? Enter amount :_ienter 0 if no tariff paid) R: Other ..' 405 How long did it take you to visit the HCP from the time you left home until the time you got back home again (travel time + time spent at HCP)? Choose one (Mark box with an X) Overnight ->407. Enter rands spent on accommodation R: ->409, Enter rands spent on food and drink IR: Between 2 and 12 hrs Less than 2 hours 410 Did someone accompany you to the health care provider? YES I --> go to the next question NO -> skip to question 426 (at bottom of page) 411 What is the employment status of your companion/escort? Choose one (Mark box with an X) Employed 412 -> go to question 413 (next block) Self-employed 412 ~ go to question 413 (next block) Unemploved , __ StudenVLeamer 422 ....4. 23. Days unable to attend schooll college because of accompanying you to HCP: Looking for work 424 -'425. Days unable to look for work because of acco~anying_you to HCP: Receiving GranVPension Other .., __c 413 On what basis is your companion/escort employed? Choose one IMark box with an )I Casual 414 -415. Enter average no. of days worked per week -416. Enter average amount brought home per day (after deductions e.q. tax) -421. Enter no. of days unable to work to accompany you to the HCP Weekly 417 .....418. Enter average amount brought home per week (after deductions e.g. tax) ->421. Enter no. of days unable to work to accompany you to the HCP Monthly 419 -420. Enter average amount brought home per month (after deductions e.g. tax) -421. Enter no. of days unable to work to accompany you to the HCP 426 Is there another visit in the last 3 months to a health care provider other than this clinic which we have not discussed? YES ~go to the next question (top of p~e 30) NO -. skip to question 468 (top of page 32) COMMENTS FROM EDITOR COMMENTS FROM DATA CAPTURER ro~~~~Oa~ecs~~:;~~ete Fieldworiter tick if Fieldwor1{""s) -4_;c"'on:::JnP:::::'Ie::::'e.."_'d_:_ .~ _~p.~.!£~:. following queStiOll Is). completed: completed: compteted: t----------t---------r--.-- --.-,-.- .-.-----t----- .-.-j------.- t-----j f---- ..----.-- ..-.- ...-......-.-- ....-.-.--- .-. I-------+--------J------l------j.-----! f---.. ..--..-----.------+-------f------j------f------- A76 Patient Initials: I IDate: IClinic: I I Interviewer code: I 436 How did you travel to this health care provider for that visit / admission? Use visual aid to select a mode of transport. Choose one (Mark box with an Xl Walk Bicycle Animal (e.g. donkey) Taxi 437 ->438. Enter amount paid for return fare to HCP by taxi: R: Bus 439 ....4..40. Enter amount paid for return fare to HCP by bus: R: Train 441 ....4..42. Enter amount paid for return fare to HCP train: R: Private motor vehicle Ambulance 443 ->445. Tariff paid? Enter amount: (enter 0 if no tariff paid) R: Other 446 How long did it take you to visit the HCP from the time you left home until the time you got back home again (travel time + time spent at HCP)? Choose one (Mark box wilh an X) Overnight ->448. Enter rands spent on accommodation R: -450. Enter rands spent on food and drink R: Between 2 and 12 hrs Less than 2 hours 451 Did someone accompany you to the health care _p_rovider? YES -i go lo the next queslion NO -> skip lo question 468 (top of next page) 452 What is the employment status of your companion/escort? Choose one (Mark box with an X Employed 453 - go to question 454 (nexl block) Self-employed 453 -> go lo question 454 (next block) Unemployed Student/Leamer 463 ·-'464. Days unable to attend school! college because of accomnanvlnq you to HCP: Looking for work 465 ·->466. Days unable lo look for work because of acccmcanvino you lo HCP: Receivino Grant/Pension Other I 454 On what basis is your companion/escort employed? Choose one (Mark box with an Xl Casual 455 ....4..56. Enter average no. of days worked per week --'457. Enter average amount brought home per day (after deductions e.c. tax) -'462. Enter no. of days unable to work to accompany you to the HCP Weekly 458 ....4..59. Enter average amount brought home per week (after deductions e.c, tax) ....4..62. Enter no. of days unable to work to accompany you to the HCP Monthly 460 ->461. Enter average amount brought home per month (after deductions e.q. tax) ->462. Enter no. of days unable to work to accompany you to the HCP 467 Is there another visit in the last 3 months to a health care provider other than this clinic which we have not discussed? I YES I _, maximum number of visits entered, go to question 468 (top of page 32) NO I -> go to question 468 (top of page 32) COMMENTS FROM EDITOR COMMENTS FROM DATA CAPTURER Ploase correcllcomplete the Fiekfworkcr lick if Fieldworker tick if Please correct/complete the FieldworXer tick if FieldwDfker lick if Caprurer tick if following queslion (si com leted; completed: foltowng cuesnon (s) completed: compleled: compleled: ------ A77 Patient Initials: IDate: IClinic: I IInterviewer code: I CAREGIVER COSTS IN THE LAST 3 MdNTHS Read: We wish to understand what this illness has cost your family and friends in terms of time caring for you at home. If you have been ill for some time we would like you to tell us about the person who has cared for you in the last 3 months. If more than one person has cared for you please tell us about the person who looked after you the most. 468 Has anyone (including family or friends) looked after you at home because of any illness in the last 3 months? YES -_._--_ ...__ ._------_ ..._ _. go to the next question NO _. skip to question 484 (top of page 33) 469 What is the employment status of your caregiver? Choose one {Mark box with an X Employed 470 -> go to question 471 (next block) f-=- Self-employed 470 -+ go to question 471 (next block) Unemployed ... Student/Learner 480 -->481. Days unable to attend school! college because of looking after you al home in the lasl 3 months Looking for work 482 -+483. Days unable to look for work because of looking after you in the lasl 3 months: .: Receiving Grant/Pension Other ,-; <.":-." .'~' ,'0' 471 On what basis is your caregiver employed? Choose one (Mark box with an JC) Casual 472 -->473. Enter average no. of days worked per week ....4..74. Enter average amount brought home per day (after deductions e.g. tax) ->479. Enler no. of days unable to work because of looking after you at home in the last 3 months Weekly 475 -4476. Enter average amount brought home per week (after deductions e.q. tax) ....4. 79. Enter no. of days unableto work because of looking after you at home in the last 3 months Monthly 477 -478. Enter average amount brought home per month (after deductions e.q, lax) -+479. Enter no. of days unable to work because of looking afteryou in the lasl 3 months COMMENTS FROM EDITOR COMMENTS FROM DATA CAPTURER Please correclftomplete the Fieldwor1Ieted: fottowinQ Question (s) completed: comoleted: compteted: A78 Patient Initials: 498 In the last 3 months how much income have you lost as a result of not being able to work because of any Illness? Choose one (Mark with an Xl Less than R100 R100 - R500 R500 - R1000 More than R1000 503 In the last year, have you lost your job as a result of any illness? YES I .1 --> go to the next question NO 1 1 --> skip to question 505 (this page) 504 When you used to work, how much money did you bring home in a usual working month (after deductions e.g. tax)? Enter amount below: R. ................ per month I . 505 In the last year what did the household do to cope with your medical costs? Interviewer: Choose all that apply. (Mark boxes with X) Used own income Used savings Sold assets e.g animals, appliances, clothes Medical Aid Help from relatives Help from friends Borrowed money Other Not applicable 506 Did the nurse who saw you today talk to you about HIV? YES I I NO I I 507 Did the nurse who saw you today refer you for HIV couselling and/or testing? YES I I NO I I 508 Did you have an HIV test (rapid testl ftngerprick method or drawing of blood from your arm) at the clinic today? YES I I NO I I 509 Have you been tested for HIV in the past? YES I I NO I I COMMENTS FROM EDITOR COMMENTS FROM DATA CAPTURER Please cc-ecvcompete the Fleld\..e. rker lick if FieldW'ori<.er tick if Please correcvcomplele tha Flek:lworkar lick if Fieldwotl(er tick If Capturer lick if following queslion (s) ccmpjeteë; com leted: following question (s) com leted: completed: completed: -- A80 , Patient Initials: I IDate: I 1Clinic: L linterviewer code: 1 ECONOMIC IMPACT OF ILLNESS Read: We would like to understand what the economic impact of your illness has been on you and your household. In order to do this we need to know some background about your education, employment status, history and household income. We would like to remind you that all the information you give us is confidential. 484 What was the highest standard/grade you passed at school? Choose one (Mark box with an Xl Did not attend school' Sub A or Grade 1 Sub B or Grade 2 Standard 1 or Grade 3 Standard 2 or Grade 4 Standard 3 or Grade 5 Standard 4 or Grade 6 Standard 5 or Grade 7 Standard 6 or Grade 8 Standard 7 or Grade 9 Standard 8 or Grade 10 Standard 9 or Grade 11 Standard 10 or Grade 12 485 Which of the following best describes your employment status? Choose one (Mark box with an X) Employed 486 - go to question 487 (next block) Self-employed 486 -> go to question 487 (next block) Unemoloved StudenULearner 499 ->500. Days unable to attend schooV college because of any illness in the last 3 months Looking for work 501 ->502. Days unable to look for work because of any illness in the last 3 months: Receivina Grant/Pension Other 487 On what basis are you employed? Choose one (Mark box with an Xl Casual 488 ->489. Enter average no. of days worked per week ->490. Enter average amount brought home per day ~after deductions e.s. tax) ->497. Enter no. of days unable to work because of any illness in the last 3 months Weekly 491 ->492. Enter average number of weeks worked per month ->493. Enter average amount brought home per week _lafter deductions e.q. tax) -'497. Enter no. of days unable to work because of any illness in the last 3 months Monthly 494 ->495. Enter average number of months worked per year ->496. Enter average amount brought home per month (after deductions e.q, tax) ->497. Enter no. of days unable to work because of any illness in the last 3 months COMMENTS FROM EDITOR COMMENTS FROM DATA CAPTURER ~~:!~~o~~:cs~~~~lete FleldwOfker lick if Fieldworker tick if Please correct/complete the FieJdworker tick if Fieldworker tick if Capturertick ifthe comDleted: comoleted: foUowina Queslion s comDIeled: col!!.2!.eted: com leted; A79 Patient Initials: Interviewer code: 510 What is your home address? 1-- 1-----.-. 511 Do you have a telephone at home? YES _, 512. Enlernumber: NO 513 Do you have a cellphone? YES -> 514. Enter number: NO .. 515 Do you have a work address? Enter below: J 517 Do you have a work telephone number? YES -4518. Enter number: - NO .. 519 Do you have an alternative telephone number (friend, relative, neignbour)? YES -> 520. Enter number: -) 521. Enter name of contact: -> 522. Enter how you are related to this contact (son, friend, neighbour): NO 524 SCHEDULE PATIENT FOR FOLLOW-UP INTERVIEW AFTER 3 MONTHS Enter date below: DATE: I I MONTH: I _l YEAR: END OF BASELINE INTERVIEW A81 ANNEX 11 Follow-up interview questionnaire- English version A82 LUNG HEAL TH SURVEY FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONNAIRE (English version) University of Cape Town Lung Institute Centre for Health Services Research and Development, University of the Free State Department of Community Health, University of the Free State Medical Research Coun""c""il'-- _ Patient initials: Interviewer code 8 Do you know the year of your birth? YES I 9 I -+ Enter year of birth & go to question 11:1 NO I 110 I -+ Enter age at last birthday & go to question 11: 11 Remember when we last spoke to you here at the clinic 3 months ago. Think carefully back to with your state of health on the day of the first interview, do you think your state of health today Is ..• X. SYMPTOM SEVERITY IN THE LAST MONTH I am now going to ask you some questions about how your chest has been in the last month. You will recognize the questions from the first interview. Please think carefuliy about your symptoms IN THE LAST MONTH before answering each question. 12 13 14 15 16 17 A83 Read to patient (and complete with the help of the visual aid page 4) I also want to ask you about the state of your health TODAY. Again you will recognize the questions from the first interview. Just as before you will need to choose one box per group to describe the state of your health TODAY. MOBILITY 18 , I I] IJ U I have no problems in I have some walking about problems in walking I am confined to about bed SELF-CARE 19 I.J LJ [I LJ I have no problems I have someproblems washing or I am unable to washwith self-care dressing. m_ïl>_elf or dress myself USUAL ACTIVITIES (e.g. work, study, housework, family or leisure activities) 20 il i I D [I [-II _J I have no problems I have some I am unable to with performing problems with usual activities performing usual perform usual activities activities PAIN I DISCOMFORT 21 i] [l l : U I have no pain or I have moderate pain I have severe pain discomfort or discomfort or discomfort ANXIETY I DEPRESSION 22 CJ LJ [J Cl [I I am not anxious or I am moderately I am extremely depressed anxious or depressed anxious ordepressed A84 Read to patient (and complete with the help of the visual aid page 6) I also want to ask you about the state of your health IN THE LAST MONTH. Again you will recognize the questions from the first interview. Just as before you will need to choose one box per group to describe the state of your health IN THE LAST MONTH. MOBILITY 24 I j j"1 l_ LJ I have no problems in I have some I am confined to walking about problems in walkingabout bed SELF-CARE 25 LJ iLJI LJ lj I have no problems I have someproblems washing or I am unable to washwith self-care dressing myself or dress myself USUAL ACTIVITIES (e.g. work, study, housework, family or leisure activities) 26 [J IJ t. lJ II I have no problems I have some I am unable to with performing problems with usual activities performing usual perform usual activities activities PAIN I DISCOMFORT 27 lj CJ L.. .! U LJ I have no pain or I have moderate pain I have severe pain discomfort or discomfort or discomfort ANXIETY I DEPRESSION 28 U LJ LJ 0 LJ I am not anxious or I am moderately I am extremely depressed anxious or depressed anxious or depressed A86 Best imaginable To help people say how good or bad a health state is, we have drawn a state of health scale (rather like a thermometer) on which the best state you can imagine is marked 100 and the worst state you can imagine is marked O. 100 We would like you to indicate on this scale, in your opinion, how good or bad your own health is TODAY. Please do this by drawing a line from the box below to whichever point on the scale indicates how good or bad your state of health is today. o Worst imaginable state of health A8S Besl imaginable To help people say how good or bad a health state is, we have drawn a slate of health scale (rather like a thermometer) on which the best state you can imagine is marked 100 and the worst state you can Imagine is marked O. 100 We would like you to indicate on this scale, in your opinion, how good or bad your own health has been IN THE LAST MONTH. Please do this by drawing a line from the box below to whichever point on the scale indicates how good or bad your slate of health has been IN THE LAST MONTH. o Worst imaginable state of health A87 Interviewer: Are you conducting this interview at the patient's home or at the clinic? Choose ONE. Mark box with an X. 30 At the patient's home I I _, skip to question 33 (this page) At the clinic I I --+ go to the next question Including today, have you been back to the clinic (to collect meds, for a check-up, to see a nurse or doctor etc.) in the last 3 months after our first interview? 31 Interviewer: Indicate NO if the patient has not been back to the clinic after the first interview and is attending the clinic today ONLY for the purpose of the interview. YES I I --+ go to the next question NO I I --+ skip to question 156 (top of page 14) Interviewer: Have you confirmed in the folder that the patient attended the clinic in the last 3 months after the first interview? 32 YES I I --+ skip to question 34 (this page) NO I I _, skip to question 34 (this page) Have you been back to the clinic in the last 3 months after our first Interview? 33 YES I I --+ go to the next question NO I I --+ skip to question 157 (page 14) I would like to know about ALL your visits back to this clinic in the last 3 months after our first interview and including this visit today (if attending the clinic for reasons besides the interview). As with the first interview, we will use your folder (if available) to help refresh your memory. TB Patients: I will only ask you to tell me about visits besides when you came to collect your TB medication. 34 Besides visits to collect TB medication, how many times have you been back to the clinic In the last 3 months after our first interview? Enter number of times: A88 35 43 39 40 41 49 42 A89 THIS CLINIC IN THE VISIT 4 BACK TO THIS CLINIC IN THE 51 59 LAST 3 MONTHS Month of Visit: 58 66 A90 THIS CLINIC IN THE 67 75 74 A91 VISIT 8 BACK TO THIS CLINIC IN THE 83 91 LAST 3 MONTHS Month of Visit: 87 88 90 A92 99 Has a nurse at this clinic collected any phlegm/sputum samples for testing in the last 3 months after our first interview? Interviewer: Show YES NO 101 Has a nurse at this clinic asked you to collect any phlegm/sputum samples at home in the last 3 months after our first interview? Interviewer: Show YES NO 103 Have you been diagnosed with TB in the last 3 months after our first interview? YES I I --+ go to the next question NO I I --+ skip to question 108 (this page) 109 Have you had a chest X-ray in the last 3 months after our first interview? YES I I --+ 110. How many Chest X-Rays have you had? NO I ~~m:~;!I~ N';~,!,;~.ili\:~"l'~i~";:U;U:'3 i'l:~" o;.<:i;;:::tt~~:;';:~~'''Ïi~;~:·:~~'~·';;j;;jt!:k.~~:··;:"f~~1i· A93 112 Did the nurse refer you to a doctor at ....... (insert name of clinic) clinic? .__ .__ . ""'YES"" --,_, - ---_. -. 1- go to the next questionr-tN--Ox-r- 1 -> skip to question 115 (this page) 113 Have you seen the doctor yet? YES ---- --I I ------114. How many times in the last 3 months? NO -I I 115 Did the nurse refer you to a doctor at another clinic or hospital? YES NO SMOKING 116 Have you ever smoked? YES- -- --- I ' go to the next questionNO ,- I - skip to question 125 (top of ~e 13) 117 Do you smoke currently? YES - -- ----------- 1_ -< ~ the next guestion ---NO ---1 , skip to question 123 (this page) When did you stop smoking? 123 I-B=-e-:-fo-re-t=-hie-n--t=efïj~-r-s;~-t---- - After the first interview NO A94 143 On what employed? Choose Casual ->145. Enter average no. of days worked per week ->146. ->151. -148. -151. ->150. ->151. A95 157 Have you been diagnosed with TB in the last 3 months after our first Interview? YES I I _. go to the next question NO I I _. skip to question 160 (this page _Smoking) 158 Where were you diagnosed with TB? Interviewer: Enter clinic/hospital name below. 159 Where are you receiving your TB treatment? Interviewer: Enter clinic/hospital name below. SMOKING 160 Have you ever smoked? YES I I _, go to the next Question NO I I - skip to question 169 (top of page15) 161 00 you smoke currently? YES I I _, go to the next question NO I I -. skip to question 167 (this page) When did you stop smoking? 167 r=B-e7fu-re~th-e~fir-s~t~in~te-rv-i~e-w------------'------'----------~----~----------------------------------4 After the first interview --o 0 to the next question Has a nurse at this clinic advised you to reduce or quit smoking in the last 3 months after our first Interview? 168 rY~E~S~---------------------r-----mr.~~ NO A96 170 Have you come to the clinic today just for the purpose of this interview or also to see a nurse/doctor? Just for the purpose of the interview I I _, skip to question 230 (top of page 17) Also to see a nurse/doctor I I _, go to the next question MEDICATION RECEIVED TODAY INHALERS RECEIVED TODAY Interviewer: Show patient photo's of inhalers in visual aid (pages 28 and 21). 171 RELIEVER INHALERS THAT YOU ARE USING NOW (Interviewer: Check ALL that apply). 172 Fenaterol (Berotee) 174 Fenoterolllpratropium (Duovent) 176 Ipratropium (Atrovent) 178 Salbutamol (Asthavent) 180 Salbutamolllpratropium (Combivent) 182 Salmeterol (Serevent) No. of times taken each day No. of puffs taken each time 184 Budesonide 100 185 186 184 Budesonide 200 185 186 184 Budesonide (don't know the dose) 185 186 NO _, go to the next question (top of page 16) A97 Interviewer code: ANTIBIOTICS RECEIVED TODAY Interviewer: Show patient photo's of antibiotics in visual aid (pages 30 and 31). 191 lnterviewer Did the patient receive an antibiotic on the chart to take home today? - - YES - -_. --- "," . --1--;- co~plete the following table 0_ni.~b!()~~!ha~you are using now)~. I I - skip to question 228 (this page) ANTtBIOTICS RECEIVED TODAY (Interviewer: Check ALL that apply) -- - . No. of times to be No of Nc. of days to be taken each day tablets/capsules to taken for - - .- be taken each time (DuratlOIl.~! course ._,_ 192 Amoxicillin 250mg capsules(Betamox 250) 193 194 195 500mg - - _ ... - 196 Amoxicillin capsules ----- - -- - (Betamox 500)__ _ 197 198 199-- ._--- ----- 200 Amoxicillinldavulanic acid tablets(Bio-Amoksiklav) 201 202 203f---- Cotrimoxazole tablets --204 (Cozole I Bactrim) 205 206 207--- .._ - ._.. -------- __ . ------._--_ .._.- _20-8 Doxycycline capsules(D2_XY9!.!Jl. ___ 209 210 211_ .. - _.--- 1---- - - _" --"-_. 2~2 Erythromycin tablets(Rubimycin)_ _ 213 214 -_._- 215 216 Flucloxacillin capsules -- (Floxa(!en) 217 218 219 - ----I _. 220 Fluconazole tablets 221 222 223 __(.Q!flucaDL. __........ - _ .. .... - .. . '..... Penicillin VK tablets I Pen VK tablets .---J224 (Betapen) 225 226 227 !i OTHER MEDICATION RECEIVED TODAY Interviewer: Besides the Inhalens,prednisone and antibiotics, did the patient receive any other medication shown on the chart to take home today? - ---,------- - 228 YES - complete the following table(Other medication received toda:i) NO • skip to question 230 (top of page 17) OTHER MEDICATION RECEIVED TODAY (Interviewer: Check ALL that apply) 229 A98 · INHALERS THAT YOU ARE USING NOW Interviewer: Show patient photo's of inhalers in visual aid (pages 28 and 29). 230 Are you currently using an inhaler(s) at home? - -_._--_ .. - YES I --, comelete the following 2 tables (Reliever & Preventer inhalers) I -, -_.-NO I skip to question 247 (this page) ~.~~~~~~~NH~~=~~~~.~ T YO~_~R~_~~I~~_.~~~ (I~~~~i~:~r: ~~~~~_~~~~~~~~.~ty). ._._. . _.. X§_~_~~.:~_Q.._. 231 Fenoterol (8erotec) -. 232. Does ,!,is inhaler improve ~ou~ difficult __ __._ _._.._._ _ __ __ _.. .____ _._. ..__ .._.._.__ Q~athlng ml(lutes after uSing it? _.._ _ . 233 F t III I . (0 t) -. 234. Does this inhaler improve your difficult ......_.+_e_n_o __e_ro_~~_~~.~~_ uoven breathing minutes after using it? ...__ ..._. ..._ ......_. .....236. Does this inhaler improve your difficult 235 Ipratropium (Atrovent) ._. __ ..breathing minutes after usin9.J!1___ ._. '--"'-"'-'r--- 237 Salbutamol (Asthavent) -.. 238. Does this inhaler improve your difficult ..._..._.-...-.-------------------f--.---- ..~..~;;Ithil}g ..T_!'IJ..l)uteasfter usingXL . ., 240. Does this inhaler improve your difficult 239 Salbutamolllpratropium (Combivent) r---'" breathing minutes after using it?'242. Does,this inhaler improve your difficult 241 Salmeterol (Serevent) breathing minutes after using it? Interviewer: Is the patient using a preventer inhaler al home? 243 ~::.-:·~=:-~~=~-=-.·::===~==:=::~.=.·=-.r==:·.=l:~=~~~~~ï~n8:ii:~:~:;~~~ers)-·----·--·-·--·:= PREVENTER INHALERS THAT YOU ARE USING NOW (Interviewer: Choose ONE). . - - - -.-------1 No. of times taken each day No. of puffs taken each time 1---.-- -----.------,----t--,---------j---,--.-------.-- .... 244 Budesonide 100 245 246 --r------ ..-.-..--.--..--. ...-.- ..-..-.- ..-------.-.----.-.-t---t-----.------t----!--------- 244 Budesonide 200 245 246 244 Budesonide (don't know the dose) 245 246 PREDNISONE THAT YOU ARE USING NOW Interviewer: Show patient photo's of prednisone tablets in visual aid (page 29). Interviewer: Is the patient using Prednisone tablets at home on a regular basis (this means daity or almost every day)? ------. __ ._-_. No. of times taken each day I No. of tablets taken each time 247 -_.. YES 248 249 ---------- 1 1 1 NO - go to the next question (top of page 18) A99 , Interviewer code. ANTIBIOTICS THAT YOU ARE USING NOW Interviewer. Show patient photo's of antibiotics in visual aid (pages 30 and 31). 250 Interviewer: Is the patient using any of the antibiotics on the chart at home on a regular basis? YES I I _. complete the following table (Antibiotics that you are using now} NO I I -+ skip to question 278 (this page) ANTIBIOTICS THAT YOU ARE USING NOW (Interviewer: Check ALL that apply) No. of times taken each day No of tablets/capsules taken each time Amoxicillin 250mg capsules 251 252 (Betamox 250) 253 Amoxicillin 500mg capsules I 254 (Betamax 500) 255 256 Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid tablets 257 (BicrAmoksiklavl 258 259 Cotrimoxazole tablets 260 261 262 (Cozole I Bactriml Doxycycline capsules 263 (Doxvclin) 264 265 Erythromycin tablets 266 267 268 (Rubimycin) Flucloxaciltin capsules 269 270 271(Floxapen) Fluconazole tablets 272 273 274 (Diflucan) Penicillin VK tablets I Pen VK tablets 275 276 277 (Betapen) OTHER MEDICATION THAT YOU ARE USING NOW Interviewer: Besides the inhalers, prednisone and antibioties, is the patient using any other medication shown on the chart? 278 ..... complete the following table (Other medication that you are usingYES now) NO -+ skip to question 280 (top of page 19) OTHER MEDICATION THAT YOU ARE USING NOW (Interviewer: Check ALL that apply) AIOO patient: Pictures of other health care providers on visual aid Read: As in the first interview, we wish to know whether you have been to any other health care provider besides this clinic in the last 3 months after the last interview. Other health care providers include hospitals (public, private, mine), other primary care clinics besides this one, private doctors, traditional healers etc. We would like to know about all visits to other health care whether attended as an or were admitted. 281 How many times have you been to another health care provider besides this clinic in the last 3 months after our first interview? Interviewer: Enter number below. Then enter details for the visits. AWl Interviewer code: (travel employed? Enler average no. of days worked per week home per day Enler no. of days unable to work lo accompany you lo the HCP Enter average amount brought home per week AI02 AI03 LHS Follow-u e22 Interviewer code 332 333 Bus 335 Train 337 Private moto~vehicle Ambulance 339 '341. Tariff aid? Enter amount: (enter 0 if no tariff_paid) Other 342 How long did it take you to visit the HCP from the time you left home until the time you got back home again (travel time + time spent at HCP)? Choose one Mark box wilh an X Overnight '344. Between 2 and 12 hrs Less than 2 hours 347 Did someone accom YES NO 348 What is the employment status of your companion? Choqseone~~=b~o~x~w~it~h~a~n~X~~~-'r- .- __ ~ ~ __ ~~ __ ~~~ _ Employed Self-~mploy~ __ Unemployed SludenVLeamer ----j359361-- Receiving GranlÏPenSiorï -- .- - 350 On what basis is your companion/escort employed? Choose one Mark box with an Casual 351 '352. Enter average no. of days worked per week '353. Enter average amount brought home per day after deductions e. . tax Enler no. of days unable to work lo accompany you to Ihe HCP Weekly 354 Enter average amount brought home per week (~f!_erQ~ucti1(1:01£IrlG IhIrI ·---·stVIUS N here IJlo do not continue Question 12 (Page 1) You must nol consider patients who have previously completed the full questionnaire, You may consider patients you have screened previously but who did not qualify for the full questionnaire at that stage, but who have now returned to the clinic. For example a patient attends the clinic on Monday with a cough. He doesn't qualify for the full questionnaire because he has no difficult breathing, a cough of less than a week's duration, no past cough in the last 6 months and no marker of severe disease. On Friday he returns to the clinic. He now reports that his cough has been ongoing for more than 7 days. Therefore this patient now qualifies for the study and the full questionnaire can be completed, once you have consented the patient. 12 I Have you participated in this study before (full questionnaire ± 1 hour)? YES I - do nol conlinue NO X -+ go lo Ihe nexl question Questions 13 - 14 (Page 1) Most clinics are staffed by nurses and doctors only visit once or twice a week. In these clinics you may come across patients who have been asked to attend on these days specifically to see a doctor. Usually they will not see a nurse again on that day. These patients who have been seen only by a doctor, and not by a nurse as well on the day of the interview, must not be considered for inclusion in the study. Patients should be considered for inclusion in the study if they have been seen by a nurse (usually a nursing practitioner) on the day of the interview. Some patients may have also seen a doctor. This usually occurs when the nurse has asked the doctor for a second opinion. These patients must be considered for inclusion in the study. Al53 · Were you seen ONLY by a doctor today? 13 YES -> do nol conlinue NO X - go lo Ihe nexl question IWere you seen by a nurse/nursing sister today? 14 i YES X -> go lo Ihe nex1question I ! NO -> do not conlinue Question 15 (Page 1) Difficult breathing is defined in the glossary. You must use the terms tight chest, shortness of breath and wheeze to illustrate to the patient what exactly difficult breathing entails. Patients who report difficult breathing on the day of the interview qualify for the study and full questionnaire. Stop the screening process and consent the patient before continuing with the questionnaire. After you have done this, skip question 16 and continue with question 17. The PDA will not lose your data when you stop to consent the patient. Click the grey power button on the top right to recommence with the interview. Do you have difficult breathing (tight chest, shortness of breath, wheeze) today? YES 15 IX -CONSENT I _, skip to question 17 NO ! - go to the next question Question 16 (Page I) Difficult breathing is defined in the glossary. You must use the terms tight chest, shortness of breath and wheeze to illustrate to the patient what exactly difficult breathing entails. Patients who report difficult breathing in the last 6 months, even if they are not symptomatic on the day ofthe interview, qualify for the study and full questionnaire. Stop the screening process, and consent the patient before continuing with the rest of the questionnaire. After you have done this, continue with question 17. r Have you had difficult breathing (tlght'chest, shortness of breath, wheeze) in the last 6 months? t YES 16 X - CONSENT -> go to the next question NO _, go to the next question A154 Question 17 (Page 2) This is a relatively straightforward question. It is worthwhile pointing out that cough need not be the reason for attending the clinic today in order to answer yes. You must enter yes for any patient with a cough on the day of the interview, regardless of whether it was the reason for them coming to the clinic today or not. Do you have a cough today? 17 . YE-S----. , X J-~go to the nexï·questio~------------·--------- NO---·----·-- --.---+-'-','-----+-,--.= do not continue ..... ---.-.-------- Questions 18 - 19 (Page 2) This is an extremely important question. The study is looking at the delay between onselof respiratory symptoms like cough and an accurate diagnosis 01"1'13. The longer people are symptomatic in the community without being diagnosed and treated. the greater the chance that more people will be infected with '1'13. This study will look at the average delay between onset of symptoms and diagnosis in the Free State and is therefore an essential part of planning TB services. It is therefore extremely important that you pay particular attention to this question. Ask the patient the question and then allow a silent pause. Jumping in with suggestions like 3 weeks, 2 days will lead the patient and give you an unreliable answer. Be patient. Allow the patient time to think and give you a considered response. If the pat ient is really at a loss you can ask then whether their symptoms have been troubling them for a matter of days, weeks, months or years. Allow them to select a category and again wait for them to produce a spontaneous answer. If it is a matter or weeks or months and the patient is still struggl ing to recall the exact duration, you may use notable calendar highlights to help them remember. Example: "Did this difficult breathing start before or after Easter?" A calendar with the Public Holidays highlighted is included in the visual aid to help you (pages 2 3). Beware of the patient who answers "last of last week/month/year" or "the day before the day before yesterday". These are colloquial expressions and do nol relled actual duration accurately. Prompt these patients with days, months, weeks or years. Once you have obtained rul answer, mark the relevant category (days or weeks or months or years) and enter the number alongside. The PDA will skip to a screen which says "Enter number" when you select a category. For how long have you been coughing? Choose one option and enter number. Days 18 --_ ..__ ...._-_ ..------_._._._._--_._- _.- ~ 19. Enter number:Weeks X -~ 19. Enter number: 2 Months ---. _.• 19. Enter number: Years ~ 19. Enter number: A155 Question 20 (page I) This question is directed at you, the interviewer, and should be completed based on the response to the previous question (Questions 18 - 19: duration of cough). Do not be tempted to use a shortcut and substitute asking patients if they have been coughing for 7 days or longer instead of "For how long have you been coughing?" This will lead the patient and provide you with an unreliable answer. Patients who have been coughing for 7 days or longer qualify for the study and full questionnaire. Stop the screening process and consent the patient before continuing with the questionnaire. Aller you have done this, skip question 21 and continue with question 22. Question 21 (Page I) Patients qualify for the study if they have heen coughing for less than 7 days, but have had a similar episode or episodes in the last6 months. Stop the screening process and consent the patient if you haven't already done so belore continuing with the questionnaire. After you have done this, continue with question 22. 21 Have you had another episode of cough like this one in the last 6 months? ....,..,yE=S=----- .--- -.-- ...-.--- ... '- x .....-..-.-----.- --- -----------------1• CONSENT if haven't already .-" .--.-..------.-.-----.--f-----.- -. go to the next question . ..__. _.__ . ._. ..__.. NO -. go to the next question Questions 22 - 23 (Page 2) The respiratory rate is how fast the patient is breathing and is measured in breaths per minute. A high respiratory rate is tin indicator of respiratory disease. How /0 measure (/ respiratory rate: I. Count the number of breaths over lfull minute. 2. Wait for the second function on your digital watch to register "00" before starting. 3. Watch the patient's chest in the area of the sternal notch (this is the area just above your ribcage in the centre of your throat, visible above the patient's collar) and count" I" every time you see this area rise. This corresponds to one breath. 4. Count the number oftimes the chest rises over the full minute. Stop when the second function of your watch registers "00" again. Note the number of breaths per minute. Breathing is controlled automatically by your brain. It can come under voluntary control like when you hold your breath when swimming under water. As soon as you tell someone that you will be counting how fast they are breathing they become conscious of their breathing and control switches from "automatic" to "voluntary". This may lead to a false result and you risk not capturing their normal respiratory rate. A156 This can be avoided by "masking" what you are doing. Most patients are familiar with the procedure of taking a pulse rate. This involves feeling for the pulse on the inside of the wrist (the pulse can be found on the "thumb" side) while watching your watch. We recommend that you pretend lo take the patient's pulse and while doing so counl the respiratory rate. Tryout this exercise with a friend: l . Tell him/her you are first going to measure their pulse rate. Pretend to measure their pulse while counting their respiratory rate. Remember this respiratory rate. 2. Now tell them you are going to measure how fast they are breathing. This time watch their chest without pretending to take the pulse rate. 3. How does the first measurement compare with the second one'? You wiIl note that patients tend to breathe faster when they arc conscious 0 f the fact that you are measuring how tast they breathe. Patients with a respiratory rate of 30 breaths per minute or more, qualify for the study and full questionnaire if they haven't done so already. Question 23 is directed at you, the interviewer, and should be completed based on the respiratory rate noted in Question 22. If the respiratory rate is 30 breaths per minute or more stop the screening process, consent the patient if you haven't done so already and then continue with the questionnaire (question 24: temperature), 22 Interviewer: What is the respiratory rate? Count number of breaths over 1 full minute. Enter Respiratory Rate (breaths/min) I 22 . :: 23 Interviewer: What is the respiratory rate? .- 29 breaths I minute or less X - go to the next question -30 breaths I minute or more -. CONSENT if haven't already -. go to the next question Qlli,;stions 24 -:26 (Page 2) A high temperature indicates an infection, which may be respiratory in nature. Normal body temperature is 37 degrees Celsius. How to measure the patient's temperature using CJ digital thermometer: I. Take the thennometer out of the plastic holder. 2. Ensure that the metallic tip is clean (wash / wipe between patients) 3. Switch the thermometer on by pressing down the power button. 4. The thermometer will beep when it is switched on. 5. The screen will first display 188.8, indicating that the LCD screen is working. 6. Within seconds it will display a flashing "L degrees Celsius" indicating that it is ready to be used. 7. If the "L degrees Celsius" stops flashing, push the power button and start again. Al57 8. Place the metallic tip under the tongue of the patient and instruct himlher to close hislher mouth. Ask the patient not to bite the thermometer. 9. Wait for the thermometer to start beeping. This will take approximately 30 seconds. 10. When the thermometer stops beeping, remove it from the patient's mouth and read the temperature. Il. Switch off the power button when finished. 12. Rinse the metal probe and replace in the plastic holder. The thermometer is battery-powered but one battery has sufficient power to take 4000 temperatures. Note the temperature in the space provided. Question 25 is directed at you, the interviewer, and should be completed based on the temperature recorded in Question 24. lf the temperature is 38 degrees Celsius or more, stop the screening process, consent the patient if you haven't done so already and then continue with the questionnaire (Question 27: More questions on difficult breathing). NB: If the patient has a temperature of37.9 degrees Celsius or less and has not qualified on a previous criteria (i.e you have not already consented the patient) the patient does not qualify for the interview. Do not continue. 24 Interviewer: What is the patient's temperature? Take the temperature with the thermometer. Enter Temperature (in degrees Celsius) I .' 37.5 I 25 Interviewer: Is the temperature 38 degrees Celsius or more? 37.9 Celsius or less _. Patient consented already? -> continue with question 27 X --+ Patient not yet consented? _, do not continue 38 Celsius or more -> CONSENT if haven't already -> complete full questionnaire - go to question 27 (top of page 3) MORE QUESTIONS ON DIFFICULTY BREATHING (Questions 27 - 34, Page 3) Questions 27 - 28 (Page 3) These are repeats of the screening questions to determine whether you should complete further questions on difficulty breathing. If the patient has either difficulty breathing today, or has had difficulty breathing in the last 6 months you must complete the questions in this section. Jfthe patient reports no difficulty breathing at all you can skip these questions and go to Question 35 at the top of page 4 (More Questions on Cough). Do you have difficult breathing (tight chest, shortness of breath, wheeze) today? 27 YES I I -> skip to question 29 NO IX I -> go to the next question Have you had difficult breathing (tight chest, shortness of breath, wheeze) in the last 6 months? 28 YES - Ix I -> go to the next question NO I I -. Skip to Question 35 (top of page 4 ) A158 Questions 29 - 30 (Page 3) This asks the patient about the duration of their difficulty breathing. As with cough duration, this is a particularly important question. Please see Question 19 for instructions. Question 31 (Page 3) Patients with asthma usually have intermittent symptoms meaning that they have periods where they feel quite normal, Patients with chronic bronchitis and emphysema tend to have persistent symptoms meaning that they arc never have "normal" days without symptoms. The severity of these symptoms usually worsens with every passing year. This question risks patients to distinguish between difficult breathing which is persistent ("continuously, so that your breathing is never quite right") vs. difficultbreathing which is inteiwittent ("repeatedly, but il always gets completely better"). Indicate which option applies by marking the adjacent box with an X. 31 Does this difficult breathing trouble you continuously, so that your breathing is neve,r,qUiteright" or does it trouble \ --~~~t~~:~:~dIY but always gets comPletel~_J.l.~~~.r.r_· ·__· · "_· · ----------.--------1 Repeatedly ----.- I X I Question 32 (Page 3) Patients with heart failure may also report difficult breathing. Usually they only have symptoms on physical exertion (like walking fast on the Ilat or uphill) but not at rest. On the other hand, patients with lung disease often have shortness (If breath on physical exertion as well as at rest. This question asks patients to distinguish between difficult breathing "only when walking on the flat or uphill" vs. "when resting (sitting ete)". Indicate which option applies hy marking the adjacent box with an X. Does this difficulty breathing trouble you only when walking fast on the flat or uphill or also when resting? 'I 32 -~~~nwr~:~n~a;::;~~a;:2Phiïï" ,. '.-- ..~Fx==-".·-..-~---r-------..--,-----------------./ Queslion 33 (Page 3) See glossary for definition of wheeze. Please stress to patient that we want lo know about "this current illness" meaning their present state of health. We want to know about these symptoms whether or not they were the reason the patient came to the clinic today. Indicate which option applies by marking the adjacent box with an X. Does your chest wheeze (make a whistling sound) when you breathe with your current illness? I 34 YES Ix I I NO I I 27 L A159 MORE QUESTIONS ON COUGH (Questions 3S - 42, Page 4) Question 3S (Page 4) This is a repeat of one of the screening questions to determine whether you should complete further questions on cough. If the patient has cough on the day of the interview, you must complete the questions in this section. If the patient reports no cough you can skip these questions and go to Question 43 at the top of page S (Other Symptoms of this Current Illness). 35 Do you have a cough today? YES IX _I -) go to the next question NO I I ---> skip to question 43 ( top of page 5) Questions 36 - 37 (Page 4) See glossary for explanation or a dry and productive coughs. Patient may not understand the terms "phlegm" or "slime" but responded quite well to the phrase "solid-like" during the piloting of this questionnaire C'Do you produce something solid-like when you cough?). Please stress to patient that we want to know about "this current illness" meaning their present state of health. We want to know about these symptoms whether or not they were the reason the patient came to the clinic today. Phlegm or slime may be different colours. Clear or white sputum usually indicates chronic bronchitis or asthma. Yellow or green sputum often indicates an infection. Do not confuse sputum with saliva. If in doubt you may want to clarify this with the patient ("Are you sure this is not saliva from your mouth?"). Indicate which option applies by marking the adjacent box with an X. 36 Are you coughing up phlegm or slime with your current illness? YES Ix I ~ go to the next question NO I J -+ skip to question 38 What colour is your phlegm I slime with this current illness? I Choose one option. 37 Clear IWhite Yellow I Green X Other Question 38 (Page 4) Patients may cough up different amounts of blood from cupfuls of frank blood to blood specks in the sputum. If the patient reports coughing up any amount of blood (from a blood specks in the sputum to pink sputum to frank blood) you must indicate "yes". A160 Are you coughing up blood with this current illness? 38 YES IX J NO I 1 Question 39 - 40 (page 4) There are several types of chest pain. Many patients complain of a central dull pain on coughing when they have bronchitis. This should not be confused with pleuritic pain or the sharp pain which occurs on breathing in deeply (or coughing) and which is a sign of pneumonia or TB. These questions ask first about this pain on coughing and then about this pain on breathing in deeply. Please stress to patient that we want to know about "this current illness" meaning their present state of health. We want to know about these symptoms whether or not they were the reason the patient came to the clinic today. Do you experience sharp chest pain on coughing with this current illness? 39 YES Ix I' NO I 1 -' '. Do you experience sharp chest pain on breathing in deeply with this current illness? 40 YES Ix I' ", _' , ' NO I I Question 42 (Page 4) Establishing the duration of cough is a very important part of the medical history for patients with respiratory illnesses. This question asks whether the nurse the patient saw today carried out this important task. Indicate which option applies by marking the adjacent box with an X. Old the nurse who saw you today ask you for how long you have been coughing? 42 YES .. Lx INO I _L .": OTHER SYMPTOMS OF THIS CURRENT ILLNESS (Questions 43 - 53, Page 5) Question 43 (Page 5) Patients with TB have severe night sweats so that their pajamas or bedclothes become wet with sweat. Often the clothes are become so wet that they need to get up in the middle of the night and change. This question asks patients whether they are having such night sweats with their current illness. Please stress to the patient that we want to know about "this current illness" meaning their present state of health. We want to know about these symptoms whether or not they were the reason the patient came to the clinic today. Indicate which option applies by marking the adjacent box with an X. A161 43 With this current illness, do you sweat a lot at night so that your pajamas or bed clothes are wet? YES ____._~=~.=====.=~.=--I· I NO Ix I Question 44 (Page 5) Runny or blocked noses occur with many common respiratory tract infections like the common cold. Please stress to the patient that we want to know about "this current illness" meaning their present state of health. Wc want to know about these symptoms whether or not they were the reason the patient came to the clinic today. Indicate which option applies by marking the adjacent box with an X. 44 Do you have a runny or blocked nose with this current illness? ~~s -.~~.-~~~'--....-.-... ~--:~':·l.~=:~==~r·-·-····-··--·-·-···---·-··-·--·---··----'-- Question 45 .(page 5) A sore throat occurs with many common respiratory tract infections like the common cold. Please stress to the patient thal we want to know about "this current illness" meaning their present stale of health. Wc want to know about these symptoms whether or not they were the reason t:he patient came to the clinic today. Indicate which option applies by marking the adjacent box with an X. Do you have a sore throat with this current illness? 45 ._---- . f.-~--- f_-.-.-· . -.-.--.---.-.~.- ..-.. -.-..--.-.-'¥---------.- ..-..----~~s ---.-_ ..--.-.----- - --------~----'---..,.,_'_-_1 Question 46 Wage 5) Please stress to patient that: we want to know about "this current illness" meaning their present state of health. We want lo know about these symptoms whether or not they were the reason the patient came to Ihe clinic today. Ears which leak pus usually indicate infection in that ear, usually a chronic infection. Patients with leaking ears often complain that their carts) is "wet". There may also be pain (earache) and hearing loss but we only want to know whether the ear is "leaking". Please stress to the patient that wc want to know about "this current illness" meaning their present state of health. We want to know about these symptoms whether or not they were the reason the patient came to the clinic today. Indicate which option applies by marking the adjacent box with an X. A162 Is your ear leaking pus with your current illness? 46 YES I J NO Ix I Question 47 (Page 5) Weight loss is a sign of many different illnesses like TB, emphysema and other non- respiratory illnesses like cancer. It may precede other symptoms like cough and patients may not realise that they are connected. Therefore, we have not used the phrase "this current illness" in this question but have rather left it more open by using the phrase "these days". Indicate which option applies by marking the adjacent box with an X. Are you losing weight these days? 47 YES Ix I NO I I ... ':' .. . ~.. Question 48 (Page 5) If the patient is on TB therapy at the time of the interview, or is being tested for TB or even has just been told that he/she might have TB recently you must indicate yes. Indicate which option applies by marking the adjacent box with ah X. Has a nurse or doctor told you that you might have TB recently? 48 YES , .; " '0, •I I ........ ::' ,:.' . '.' '.' " NO Ix I .Ó: .: " Question 49 (Page 5) "This illness" refers to the patient's current illness or present state of health. It can refer to illnesses other than those for which the patient has come to the clinic today. This point is particularly important for patients who are currently receiving TB therapy or being tested for TB. We want to know whether these patients have ever had TB before the current episode. Indicate which option applies by marking the adjacent box with an X. Before this illness now, have you ever had TB before? 49 YES Ix I NO I I Questions 50 - 51 (Page 5) We want to know whether patients have been exposed to the dusty environments of working underground in a mine. A163 If the patient has worked as a clerk, cleaner ete in a mine (on the surface) you must indicate no. If the patient has worked as a miner underground you must indicate yes and enter the number of years worked in the main in the space provided. Indicate which option applies by marking the adjacent box with an X. Have you ever worked underground in a mine? 50 YES Ix I ~ 51. For how many years? 17 NO I I .. Question 52 (Page 5) Breathlessness at rest or while talking is a sign of severe respiratory disease. These patients can be recognised because they appear "out of breath", breathe fast when sitting quietly and are unable to speak in full sentences without stopping to breathe. This is a question directed at you, the interviewer. If you note any of these signs in the patient you must indicate yes. Indicate which option applies by marking the adjacent box with an X. Interviewer: Is the patient breathless now during the interview (e.g. breathless while seated, breathless while talking, unable to 52 speak in full sentences without stoppin!l to breathe)?YES Ix I NO I I Question 53 (Page 5) During normal quite breathing you cannot make out the muscles in the neck. Patients with respiratory disease tend to use these muscles to help them expand their rib-cage. In these patients you will see that the neck muscles stand out, are easy to see and appear strained. If you can see the patient's neck muscles standing out when they breathe while sitting quietly with you during the interview, you must indicate yes. Indicate which option applies by marking the adjacent box with an X. Interviewer: Is the YES NO SYMPTQM SEVERITY IN THE LAST MQNTH (Questions 54 - 59, Page 6) We want to know the frequency of chest symptoms during the day and night and the impact on the patient's usual activities. Please note that the time frame for these questions is the last month. You must emphasise this to the patient. If the patient answers yes to the questions you need to prompt the patient with the three response categories (1 to 2 times per month or 1-2 times per week or most A164 nights/days). After prompting the patient with these categories allow a silent pause and time for patient to answer. If necessary, repeat the response categories. Questions 54 - 55 (Page 6) Difficulty in sleeping can because of many reasons including waking up frequently to pass water. Patients who have difficulty sleeping specifically because of difficulty in breathing and cough must answer yes to this question. Patients who have difficulty sleeping for other reasons must answer no to this question. Have you had difficulty in sleeping because of difficulty in breathing and/or cough in the last month? .---...-.-..-.--.-·-.---...-1----,--1--, -go-to-t-hën'"ë;tquestion 1X 1 .)skip to question 5~. .:...__.-.-..--..--.----.-.--.-======~--.-.--.==----__l .............. __._--._----------- Questions 56 ....57 (Page 6) Ir a patient reports any of the three symptoms in brackets, you must answer yes to the question. It is not necessary tor patients to have all three symptoms to answer yes to the question. Have you has your usual chest symptoms during the day (cough, wheeze, breathlessness) in the last month? 56 YES -_ ..._.- -NO-----------~ -.,......,-----------------_._---_._-_. __ .. Select a category: 57 ~-~::~::~:~~;~--~.=-~==.·.~==r-;=-~-I Most days I I Questions 58 - 59 (Page 6) Usual activities include work, study, housework, family or leisure activities. Jfthe patient has been limited in any of these usual activities by their chest symptoms in the last month, you must indicate yes. Has your chest problem interfered with your usual activities (e.g. work, study, housework, family or leisure activities) in the last month? 58 ~===:=~==~===~-I~~=~~=t=~::.r::;lg-.ë.·i·ïoïhë .i.iexi-quesiion·-.---.~=~===__==-~=~.~.~-~~~:~~~:=.====-NO skip to Question 60 (top of page 7 ) I----r-::-:----,--------------.- .-.---.-.-..- .-.--.---------.------------.----- Select a category: 59 1 - 2 times per week I I 1 - 2 times per month I I Most days IX L A165 HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE (Questions 60 - 71, Pages 7 - 10) These questions measure how health problems impact on quality of lite, specifically on mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. There are two parts to measuring the quality of life, the first part is to ask how health problems impact these specific areas and the second part is to ask a patient to give an overall rating on their general health related quality of life (on the scale which resembics a thermometer). The questions are first asked for the stale of the patient's health on the day of the interview and then repeated for the state of the patient's health during the last month. It is extremely important to stress this difference to the patient. First ask them to concentrate on their health status today and complete all the questions. Then ask them to cast their minds back to the last month and repeat the questions Questions 60 _.:6. 4 (today m Page 7) and 66 - 70 (last month . Page 9) rOT each facet of quality of life you will see three statements, each corresponding to a level or severity. The first statement always reflects no problem, the second statement a moderate problem and the third statement a severe problem. These will be laid out on the visual aid in a. horizontal format, with the 110 problem statement on the far left and the extreme problem Oil the far right, setting up a type of scale with no problem on one end and extreme problem on the opposite end. You will notice thai each statement has a corresponding block bullhat there are two blocks between the statements. For each facet of the level of quality of lite, you must read all three statements to the patient and allow the patient time to digest them. The patient must indicate to you which block best describes their health status. If they feel that none of the three statements accurately captures their health status and that ralher they fall somewhere in between two statements, they may choose the block between those two statements as shown below. MOBILITY 60 [J o o [j LJ I have some I have no problems in problems in walking I am confined to walking about about bed A166 You may nol explain the wording of the response categories to the patient because you risk introducing your own set of values into the question. What we want to know is how the patient perceives their own quality of life and how they would judge themselves compared to other people's standards. If the patient asks you what you mean, repeat the categories word/or word. You may not give any examples as this will lead the patient and compromise their answer. This is particularly relevant to the pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression question where patients are asks to distinguish between moderate and extreme states. It is up to the patient to decide what he/she considers moderate and what he/she considers to be extreme and then choose. Giving examples disrupts this process. A note on the PDA. The PDA does not allow sufficient screen space for you to view the options for each category in their entirety. For this reason, and to help the patient visualise the exercise, we have laid out the full versions (in all 5 languages, both for quality of life today and for quality of life in the last month) in the visual aid. Please use this to complete these questions. Questions 65 (today - Page 8) and 71 (last month -- Page 10) This question is designed to assess the patient's overall health related quality of lite using a "thermometer". Explain to the patient that at the bottom of the thermometer is the worst state that they can imagine. Bc sensitive to the fact the patient might imagine this state as being worse than death. This will differ from patient to patient and so do not illustrate this end of the scale with examples like death or extreme suffering. It is up to the patient (and nol you) to decide what they think is their worst state of health. Explain to the patient that al the top of the thermometer is the best state that they can imagine. Be sensitive to the fact the patient might imagine this state as being worse than better than normal. This will differ from patient to patient and so do not illustrate this end of the scale with examples like being tilled with vitality and energy. It is up to the patient (and not you) to decide what they think is their best state of health. Be sensitive to the fact that "normal" for the patient may be anywhere on this scale. Do not suggest lo the patient that halfway be/ween the 2 points (reading = 50) indicates "normal". If you do this you will find that most patients choose 50. If the patient requires clarification, rather say something like "normal for you may be anywhere on this scale". After explaining how the scale works to the patient, ask the patient to indicate to the point on the scale where they feel best describes how they feel today. On the paper questionnaire mark this point. On the PDA record the number pointed out on the scale (the "thermometer reading").As with the statement part of quality of lite, you will repeat this process for the last month. SMOKING (Page 11, Questions 72 - 90) The first two questions (72. ever smoked and 73. smoke currently) establish whether the patient is a never smoker, current smoker or ex-smoker. If the answer to both questions is no, the patient is a non-smoker and the questions are not applicable. Skip all the questions in this section and go to the top of the next page A167 (Details of the Consultation) and question 91. The PDA will automatically skip to this section for you. If the patient answers yes to both questions he/she is a current smoker. Proceed immediately to the next question (74 to 76. number cigarettes, pipes ete smoked per day) and complete questions 74 to 81. You will then be instructed to skip to the next page. If the patient answers yes to the first question (72. ever smoked) and no to the second question (73. smoke currently) then he/she is an ex-smoker. Skip to question 82 on the same page and complete questions 82 - 90 which brings you to the end of the page and section. 72 Have you ever smoked? YES IX I -> go to the next question NO I I ._'skip to question 91 (top of page 12) 73 Do you smoke currently? YES I I - go to the next question NO Ix I -, skip to question 82(this page) Questions 74 - 76 and 88 - 90 (Page 11) This asks on average how many cigarettes and pipes the patient smokes (or used to smoke) per day. Go through each item and mark the adjacent box ifit applies. Then enter the average no. smoked per day alongside. You must check all that apply. The PDA will ask you each item individually. If the patient does not use one of these items you may choose the N/A button (N button in the lower left of your screen). On average how many of the following Items do you smoke per day? 74 Mark appropriate boxes and enter averace number smoked per day. Check all that apply. to Shop-bought cigarettes X - 74. Enter no. smoked per day: 10 76 Hand-rolled cigarettes X -4 75. Enter no. smoked per day: 2 Pipefuls of tobacco - 76. Enter no. smoked per day: Questions 77. 82 and 85 (Page 11) These questions ask the patients when they started smoking, and in the case of the ex- smokers when they stopped. Patients tend to remember the age at which they started smoking and the year in which they stopped (e.g. "I started smoking when I was 14 years and I stopped 5 years ago in 1998"). For this reason you may enter the age or year for both of these dates. Indicate which one you prefer to enter by marking the box adjacent and entering the details alongside. The PDA will ask you to choose which one you enter and will then proceed to a screen which asks you to enter the details (Enter age or Enter year). When did you start smoking regularly (at least one cigarette I pipe per day)? Interviewer: You mav enter the aae OR the vear: 77 AGE Ix I - 78. Enter age: 14 YEAR I I -'> 79. Enter year: A168 Questions 93 and 94 (Page 12) These questions ask the patient whether the nurse told them what was wrong, and if so, what she said. Patients who have a good idea from the nurse what the problem is tend to do better and so this is an indicator of the quality of care provided at the clinic. These may be sensitive questions especially if the patient has attended for a sexually transmitted infection or has HIV/AIDS. Be gentle and patient with these questions. If the patient does tell what the nurse said record this in the patient's words in the space provided. Do not rephrase what he/she says in your own words. What did she tell you? Interviewer: Probe with examples like cold 'flu asthma TB hiah blood etc. Enter reseonse below: 94 High blood and sores in my mouth. Questions 95 - 98 (Page 12) This asks whether the patient had any sputum collected for tests. Usually but not always this is taken to look for TB, so we are particularly keen to know how well the clinics are screening the community for TB. Usually the first sample is taken that day at the clinic and the patient is given an empty container to take home and cough into the following day, and then return to the clinic. For this reason we first ask whether samples were collected at the clinic, and then whether they have received instructions to collect further samples at home. Patients may not be familiar with the term "phlegm / sputum samples" but they are familiar with the containers in which this is collected. Use the pictures of these containers in the visual aid (pages 26 and 27) to help you. Old the nurse who you saw today collect any phlegm I sputum samples for testing? Interviewer: Show patient examples of sputum jars in visual aid (page) 95 YES I X I ....9..6. How many did she collect? 1 Did the nurse who you saw today ask you to collect any phlegm I sputum samples at home? 97 Interviewer: Show patient examples of sputum jars In visual aid.YES I X I __, 98. How many did she ask you to collect? 1 NO I I •.....•.. . Question 99 (page 12) This asks whether the patient had any blood taken at the clinic today. In many clinics, there is the facility to do this at the clinic. However, in some clinics, patients may be referred to a nearby hospital for blood tests. We want to know whether the blood was physically taken at the clinic on the day of the interview. Do not answer YES if the patient has been referred elsewhere for testing, but the blood was not actually taken at the clinic. Did the nurse who saw you today take any blood for tests? 99 YES Ix I: NO I I A170 Question 81 (Page Il) This question asks current smokers to weigh up their teelings about quitting. Read all three statements in full to the patient first, and ask them to choose which one best describes their thoughts about stopping smoking now. Do not rush the patient. They will need time to consider the statements first before making their decision. Once they have made a decision, mark the adjacent box. You can only mark one box. On the PDA you will notice that the statements may not be displayed in full. For this reason they are provided in the visual aid (in all 5 languages) on pages 24 and 25. Which of the following best describes your thoughts about stopping smoking now? Interviewer: Read all 3 sta!ements to patient and ask them to choose one. ._ ...... -. .. 81 .I will stop smoking ----_._-~_ -. skip to question 91 (top of page _12)... ..._- I plan to stop smoking but not now X ..•, skip to question 9.!..Lt~!:lo.f page 12) -------- ._ ..__ ..._._- I do not plarïïo·siïiïïsmoking soon - skip to question 91 ( top of page 12) DETAILS OF CONSULTATION (Page 12, Questions 91 - 99) These questions ask patients about their treatment they received at the clinic today, on the day of the interview. Please stress to the patient that we only want to know about tests etc. done that day, the day of the interview. Question 91 (Page 12) This asks the patient why they are here at the clinic today, on the day of the interview. Patients either are at: the clinic to attend a check-up usually for a chronic disease like high blood pressure or diabetes (these appointments are known as "check-ups" or "booked" visits), or IClI· a new problem like recent onset of 'flu symptoms etc. Go through each item on the list and indicate whether the patient has attended the clinic today for that reason or not. You must mark all the options that apply. If there is an "other" reason you must mark the box next to "other" and enter the reason alongside . .lust a word about "respiratory" ...this refers to all conditions involving the respiratory tract trom colds and 'flu to asthma, bronchitis and TB. You will need to explain this to the patient. You will not see the "other" option in the list presented by the PDA. If this applies click on NEXT and the PDA will present a second screen to you with provision for you to enter this "other" reason. 91 What was the reason for coming to the clinic today? i-=:=:In:!:te:::.:rv_:,:.::.ieC:.:.::w:::_..:::hee=:=::.=:cr::_:::.:kth:.=.:a::!:.:_.:!tI!:a..p:1~pIIIL.y:......!!M::::a:;:rk:.:.,;:bo:::'.;x:::e::::s:..;w:_;!!_!i_th.!..!:!a!~.!~,n_.~!:~X~. ~ ..•.. Check-up for high blood pressure. X . Check-up for diabetes ('sug~._ .. __ ... _ Check-up for a respiratory problem .r!----.- Check-up for other problem r.:,F::..;irs::..:t...:v.;.:iS::;itc..:fo;:_:r....:a::,.:..::re:.p::s.:._ There are 2 types of inhalers or pumps. The tirst type is called the reliever inhalers because they provide rei icf immediately when the chest is light ("open the chest"). The reliever inhalers are: Feneterol (Fe-no-re-rol) Trade name: Berotec. Used for asthma and emphysema / bronchitis. l'enoterol / lpratropium (Fe-no-te-rol / I-pra-tro-pium) Trade name: Duovent A combination drug used mainly for patients with severe asthma and emphysema. Ipratropium (l-pra-tro-pium) Trade name: Arrovent A17l Used mainly for patients with emphysema. Salbutamol (Sal-but-a-mol) Trade name: Asthavent or Ventolin. The most common reliever inhaler used for asthma and emphysema. Salbutamol/Ipratropium (Sal-but-a-moll l-pra-tro-pium) Trade name: Combivent A combination drug used mainly for patients with severe asthma and emphysema. Salmeterol (Sal-met-e-rol) Trade name: Serevent Similar to salbutamol but lasts longer. Used for severe asthma or emphysema. The preventer inhalers do not open the chest immediately when tight, but rather prevent asthma symptoms when used regularly on a daily basis. They do not cure asthma but "prevent" the symptoms hence the name. There is only one type of preventer inhaler available in the Free State public service, but it comes in 2 strengths (100 and 200). It is easily recognizable to patients because it comes in a big box which also contains a spacer. This is a plastic bottle shaped device used with the inhaler. It increases the amount of drug which reaches the airways. Budesonide (Bu-des-o-nide) Trade name: Inflammide Preventer inhaler used for asthma. Reliever Inhalers (questions 101 - 112 and 117 - 128) If the patient uses a reliever inhaler, indicate the name by placing an X in the adjacent box. You must then complete the question alongside about difficult breathing. You must check all the inhalers the patient uses, and ask the difficulty breathing question for each one. The PDA will ask you to indicate whether the patient uses an inhaler or not separately for each inhaler on the chart. If you indicate YES it will automatically skip to the difficult breathing question before returning to the list of inhalers. A word of caution - patients may not be familiar with the terms "reliever" and "preventer". Ask them instead to identify medication from the chart. RELIEVER INHALERS RECEIVED TODAY (Interviewer: Check ali that apply) YES NO 101 Fenoterol (Berotec) X .....102. Does this inhaler improve your difficultbreathina minutes after usmc it? X Fenoterol/lpratropium (Duovent) X .....104. Does this inhaler improve your difficult103 breathing minutes after using it? X Preventer Inhalers (Questions 113 - 115 and 129 - 131) These inhalers are very expensive and for this reason we want to know all the details about how the patients are using them. Ask patients using Budesonide whether they know if they are on the 100 or 200 strength inhaler. Some patients may not know. For these patients mark Budesonide (don't know the dose). Then ask them how many times they use the inhaler per day, Al72 and lastly how many puffs they use at a time. This will enable us to calculate how many inhalers they would need in a year and give us an indication of cost. PREVENTER INHALERS USUALL Y USED AT HOME (Interviewer: Choose one) No. of times to be taken each dav No. of puffs to be taken each time 129 I Budesonide 100 I 130 I 131 I 129 I Budesonide 200 Ix 130 I 2 131 I 2 129 I Budesonide (don't know the dose) I 130 I 131 I Prednisone (Page 14, Questions 132 - 138) Prednisone (pred-ni-sone) is an anti-inflammatory medication used for asthma and sometimes emphysema. It is also used for other chronic disorders like in patients who have had a kidney transplant. Patients with asthma or emphysema either receive it when they have a bad attack or sometimes, in very severe cases, take it every day to prevent symptoms. They are easily recognizable because they are small white tablets. When used for attacks they are usually taken 8 at a time, once in the morning. First determine whether the patient received prednisone today. If yes, enter the number oftimes it is to be taken each day, the number of tablets at a time and the number of days t will be taken for. 132 Did you receive any prednisone tablets to take home today? No. of times to be No of tablets to be No. of days to be taken each day taken each time taken for (duration of course) YES X 133 1 134 8 135 17 1 1 NO -; go to the next question Then ask if the patient usually uses prednisone on a regular basis. If yes, again enter the number of times it is to be taken each day and the number of tablets to be taken at a time. You will note that you are not required to enter the duration of the course because if the patient uses it regularly at home. it is taken every day. 136 Did you usually take prednisone tablets at home on a regular basis? No. of times to be taken each day No. of tablets to be taken each time YES X 137 1 138 1 1 1 NO -; go to the next question (top of next page) Antibiotics (Page 15, questions 139 - 185) Again you follow the same procedure as with the inhalers and the prednisone, first asking about antibiotics received today and then about those usually used. Remember that patients might not realize that the packet of tablets in their hands is an antibiotic; rather compare the medication they have with that on the chart. Al73 Amoxicillin (Aemox-i-cil-lin) Trade name: Betamox, Amoxil This is a very commonly used antibiotic especially for respiratory tract infections (sinusitis ete). It comes in 2 strengths, 250 and 500. Both are purple and blue capsules but the 500 is twice the size of the 250. Amoxicillin / clavulanic acid (Avmox-i-cil-lin / clav-u-lan-ic acid) Trade name: Bio-Amoksiklav, Augmentin This is used less commonly for respiratory tract infections. It comes in a bottle. Cotrimoxazole (Co-tro-mox-a-zole) Trade name: Cozole, Bactrim This is used tor respiratory tract infections but also for patients with HIV. When taken every day it prevents some of the infections people with HIV/AIDS get as their immune system becomes progressively weaker. IJ comes in a blister pack. Patients often know exactly what you mean when you say "the one in tin foil". Don't confuse it with other medications which come in blister packs especially paracetamol which has a similar appearance (large round white tablet). Doxycycline (Dox-y-cy-cline) Trade name: Doxyclin. Can be used for many different types of infections some of them respiratory (bronchitis). Patients with damaged lungs sometimes get very frequent infections and use Doxycycline every day to prevent these. Erthromycin (Ery-thro-my-cin) Trade name: Rubimycin Used for respiratory tract infections especially in patients who are allergic to penicillin. Rubimycin tablets are hard to miss - they arc a neon pink! Flucloxacillin (Flu-clox-a-cil-lin) Trade name: Floxapen A form of penicillin used for infections in the ear and of the skin. Smallish capsules. Fluconazole (Flu-con-a-zole) Trade name: Diflucan Used lor fungal infections like thrush both of the mouth and of the vagina. Fluconazole is usually reserved for patients with HIV as they get very bad thrush of the foodpipe which can prevent then from swallowing. Often patients with HTV/AIDS take this every day. It comes in a plastic bottle and the tablets are pink and squarish in shape. Penicillin VK (Pen-i-cil-lin VK) Trade name: Betapen. This has a very long name which is a bit of a mouthful (phenoxymethylpenicillin) so is called Pen VK for short. Used tor a wide range of infections but most frequently for tonsillitis and pneumonia. Once again you will need to indicate whether the patient has received the medication or not, how many times it is to be taken each day, the number of tablets at a time and the duration of the course. A174 You will notice that for "antibiotics usually used at home" you will not need to fill in details of the course duration, as these are usually taken every day. Also, only 3 of these antibiotics are used as regular medication explaining why the lists for "received today" and "usually used" are different. The PDA will ask you to indicate YES or NO to each of these antibiotics in turn. If you indicate YES, it will automatically skip to the questions about no. oftimes per day, duration of course etc. ANTIBIOTICS RECEIVED TODAY (Interviewer: Check all that apply) No. of times to be No of tablets/capsules No. of days to be taken each day to be taken each time taken for I (duration of course)140 Amoxicillin 250mg capsules (Betamax 250) Ix 141 13 142 12 143 15 Other Medication (Page 16, Questions 186 - 189) This asks about a variety of other medications commonly used for respiratory problems. Follow the procedure as before, but this time you only need indicate whether the items are "received today" or "usually used". We do not require more detailed information for these. The items are displayed in the visual aid according to whether they are tablets, nasal sprays ete, but listed in alphabetical order. The items appear in a single list on the PDA. You must check all the items that apply. Acetic Acid Eardrops Used to dry out leaking ears. Beclomethasone Nasal Spray (Be- clo-me-tha-sone) Trade name: Beclate This is used for the treatment of hayfever and "sinus". It comes it a little brown glass bottle. Chlorpheniramine (Chlor-phe-ni-ra-mine) Trade name: AlIergex This is an anti-histamine used for allergies, hayfever and sometimes the itch of eczema. It comes as small yellow tablets. Enalapril (E-na-Ia-pril) Trade names: Renitec, Hypace This is a blood pressure medication. The reason that we want to know about it is that it causes a troublesome cough as a side-effect. It comes in a blister ("tin-foil") pack with the days of the week written on the packaging. Mist Expectorant (Mist Ex-pec-to-rant) Trade name: same This is cough mixture. Nystatin suspension (Ny-sta-tin) Trade names: Nystacid, Canstat This is a suspension for thrush in the mouth. It comes with a little dropper for patients to suck up a ml at a time. This is then dropped into the mouth and rinsed around. A175 Questions 191 - 192 (Page 17) This asks whether the nurse referred the patient to a doctor. This doctor may either be at the clinic itself and available the day of the interview ("at this clinic to be seen today") or coming to the clinic later in the week in which case the patient will have to return to see himlher. The nurse may also have referred the patient to a doctor in a hospital. This may either be on an urgent basis when the patient is transferred immediately ("in a hospital casualty or ward") or to see a doctor at a clinic ("in a hospital outpatient department"). Check carefully which option applies and mark the adjacent box with a X. REFERRALS Did the nurse who saw you today refer you to a doctor? 191 ~------------------------r--.1---.--J--.-..-.-.--------------------------------------YES X go to the next_9uestion NO I I -> skip to question 193 (top of page 1B) Did the nurse refer you to a doctor ... Interviewer. Choose one. Mark appropriate box with an X. in a hospital casuallY or ward '. 192 at this clinic to be seen today at this clinic for another day X in a hospital outpatient department •••• ,., •. 1 .. '...... ::' .. INCOME AND CHANGES DUE TO ILLNESS This is a long section and you will find it a challenging one to complete. Essentially illness has many economic implications from the obvious like paying to go to a private doctor to the more subtle like missing an opportunity to spend time looking for ajob. We have divided it up into different sections as follows: 1. The costs associated with attending this clinic in the last 3 months. 2. The costs of attending other health care providers in the last 3 months. 3. The costs of a caregiver in the last 3 months. 4. Economic Impact of illness. We are using a time frame of3 months because firstly, it is difficult to remember all the details of what you spent when, and what healthcare providers you have visited over longer periods. Secondly it will allow us to compare it with a second 3 month period between the baseline interview and the follow-up. It may be useful to know when this 3 month time period started when you are in a particular clinic, to help the patients visualize the exact time frames e.g. In 3 months time the Bloemfontein team will be doing the baseline questionnaire at Botshabelo U & S. Itwould be good to say to your patients "we want to know about all your visits to this clinic in the last 3 months, since mid-April and the Easter weekend". You will immediately see a smile light up on the patient's face as they will now visualize the time period you are talking about. You too can feel confident knowing that the information you then elicit from the patient is reliable, and is really about the last 3 months. AI77 Oxymetazoline Nasal Spray (Oxy-meta-zo-line) Trade name: Drixine This is a decongestant nasal spray used mainly for patients with sinusitis. Paracetamol (Pa-ra-ce-ta-mol) Trade names: Painamol, Panado This is the most common painkiller in primary care. Paracetamol/codeine (Pa-ra-ce-ta-mol / co-deine) Trade names :Painamol Plus, Betacod, Dolorol forte This is slightly stronger than paracetamol alone and commonly used in primary care. Salbutamol (Sal-but-a-mol) Trade name: Venteze This is the same as the reliever inhaler but in tablet form. Venteze tablets are easy to recognize as they are lilac in colour. Theophylline (The-oph-yl-line) Trade name: Nuelin SA This is a medication used for asthma and emphysema OTHER MEDICATION(S) RECEIVED TODAY (Interviewer: Check all that apply) Acetic Acid Eardrops ' " Beclomethasone Nasal Spray Chlorpheniramine tablets (Allergex) Enalapril tablets (Renitec) 187 Mist Expectorant COUQhmixture X Nystatin suspension (Nvstacidl Can slat) Oxymetazoline nasal spray (Drixine) X Paracetamollablets (Painamol) X ..~ Paracetamol/codeine tablets (Painamol Plus) Salbutamol tablets (Venteze)_ Theophylline tablets (Nuelin SA) ''''. "., DETAILS OF CONSULTATION cont'd (Page 17, Questions 190- 192) These questions round off the information about the details of the patient's visit to the clinic on the day of the interview. Question 190 (Page 17) First ask the patient whether they have been asked to return to the clinic by the nurse. (fyes, ask them when. Patients will often tell you when their medication runs out etc. Allow them to volunteer an answer, as chances are it will be the same as one on the list, saving you time. If not able to volunteer this information read through the list and mark where appropriate. You must check all that apply. FOLLOW~UPAPPOINTMENT Did the nurse ask you to return for a follow-up appointment? 190 Interviewer: Check all that apply. Mark boxes with an X. On a specific date ". ~, If you feel worse X lf you don'l gel beller When you run out of medication X A176 You start with visits to this clinic. Work very systematically here and you will be fine. The PDA has an advantage here as all the skips (and there are many) are automatic ensuring that you don't miss out any data unnecessarily. If you have to resort to paper, please ensure that your team leader edits this section very carefully as it is possible to miss sections without realizing it. VISITS TO THIS CLINIC IN THE LAST 3 MONTHS Here you can use the patient's folder to assist you. The folder should be used to help, not to confuse you or the patient. All you need to extract from the folder are the dates of the visits in the last 3 months, and if you feel confident the reason for attendance. Do not try tofill in the details of the visit requiredfram the notes {Yl thefolder as you will struggle. Visits are poorly documented at the best of times, writing can be illegible and there are usually many abbreviations. All you should aim to achieve by looking in the folder is to see if and when the patient attended the clinic in the last 3 . months. This can be used to prompt the patient: "I see you came to the clinic in mid-May. Can you remember that visit? Can we discuss it now?" You may want to prompt the patient further by providing the reason for attendance. This is usually the first line of the entry and is usually a symptom: "I see you came to the clinic in mid-May with a cough. Can you remember that visit? Can we discuss it now?" Be sensitive when prompting with the reason for attendance. NEVER prompt with sensitive diagnoses or symptoms like HIV, sexually transmitted disease, discharge from penis, beaten up by husband etc. This requires common sense to recognize these diagnoses/symptoms and sensitivity not to mention them. If you do mention sensitive diagnoses, you will find yourself immediately alienated from the patient, and the rest of the interview will be very difficult. Question 193 First establish whether the patient has been to the clinic in the last 3 months. You must double check the patient's answer by looking in the folder if available. Remember that recalling exactly when you were last at a clinic is a difficult task. If you find a discrepancy between what the patient has told you and what is in the folder, have understanding and be patient. 193 Haveyou attended this clinic in the last 3 months? Interviewer: Double-check this information in the folder YES I X I -+ go to the next question NO I I -> skip to question 262 (top of page 22) Questions I97 and 198 Obviously, if the folder is at hand and you are able to prompt the patient with the information it contains, then the information is likely to be more reliable than just asking the patient to recall the visits on their own. We need to know this information when we analyse the data, so have asked you to record the presence or absence of a folder. The instructions you give the patient will differ depending on whether there is a folder available or not. A178 197 Do you have a patient-held or facility-held record with you? YES I I -+ skip to Instructions A at the end of this page NO IX I _, go to the next question 198 Interviewer: Are you able to locate the folder? YES IX I -> skip to Instructions A at the end of this page NO I I -+ skip to Instructions B at the end of this page Questions 194 - 196 The aim of this section is to collect all the data about all visits to the clinic in the last 3 months. Provision has been made for you to enter a maximum of 8 visits both in the PDA and in the paper version. Obviously patients on TB treatment will have been to the clinic more than this in the last 3 months. To avoid having to enter each visit individually we first establish whether the patient has received treatment for TB in the last 3 months, when this started and how many times they visit per week to collect medication. This information is readily available from the TB Treatment card which the patient carries with them. Ask the patient if you can see this card as it will make collecting this information straightforward. You are required to enter information for non- TB medication visits to the clinic for TB patients. Usually these are rare as other problems are dealt with by the TB sisters who see the patients regularly. You must establish from the patient if their have been any other visits to the clinic besides those to collect TB meds. If they came to the clinic tor an entirely separate reason like seeing the doctor to check on their high blood pressure, you must complete one of the blocks for a visit on pages 19-20. 194 Are you currently attending this clinic for TB treatment? Choose one (Mark with an X) YES IX I ....g.o to the next question NO I I -+ skip to question 197 (this page) 195 When did you start your TB treatment at this clinic? Interviewer: Ask patient to show you their TB treatment card Date: I 24 I Month I 4 I Year 12003 196 How many times a week do or did you attend the clinic for TB treatment? Interviewer: Choose one (Mark with an X) Once ..... ' ...... , Twice Three times Four times Five times X Questions 199 - 230 (Pages 19 - 20) Here you must complete one "block" for each visit. First enter the date of this visit from the folder. If you are without the folder and the patient doesn't know the date, you may leave this out but you must enter the month. If you don't know the date click on DON''T KNOW on the PDA in the lower left of the screen. Then establish what the reason was for that visit. Follow the same process as for the reason for attendance at the clinic today (question 91, page 12), on the day of the A179 interview. You must enter more than one reason if applicable. If the reason is "other" enter this reason in the space provided. If "other" on the PDA press NEXT to bring up screen with provision for you to enter this reason. Finally ask the patient whether there is another clinic visit in the last 3 months which you have not yet discussed. If yes, enter a separate block for the second, and third, and fourth visits etc. If no further visits skip to question 231 and the top of page 21. 199 Date of Visit 1 to this clinic in last 3 months Date of Visit 2 to this clinic ill last 3 months 200 204 Date: 122 Month: I Feb Date: I 16 I Month: I March 201 What was the reason for attendance for clinic visit1? 205 What was the reason for attendance for clinic visit 2? Interviewer: Check all that apply. Interviewer: Check all that apply. Check-up for high blood pressure Check-up for high blood pressure Check-up for diabetes ("sugar') Check-up for diabetes ("sugar") Check-up for a respiratory problem X Check-up for a respiratory problem X Check-up for other problem Check-up for other problem First visit for a respiratory problem Firslvisit for a respiratory problem First visit for other problem ,. First visit for other problem .. Other (please specify): 1202 X toothache Other (please specify): 1206 203 Interviewer: Enter data for another Clinic visit? 207 Interviewer: Entër data for another clinic visit? YES 1 -+ go to question 204 (next block) YES 1 -+ go to question 208 (next block) NO 1 -> skip to question 231 (top of page 21) NO 1 -+ skip lo question 231 (top of page 21) Questions 231 - 330 (Page 21) This section is about how the patient usually travels to the clinic. Since most patients live reasonably close to the clinic they tend to use the same means of transport every time they have to come to the clinic. Show the patient the pictures of the different types of transport in the visual aid (page 34) and asked them to point out how they usually travel to the clinic. They may only select one option. Mark this option with an X in the adjacent box. In the case of public transport (taxi, bus, train) you must then proceed to ask them how much they usually pay to travel to the clinic and back home again using this form oftransport. Emphasise that we want the cost of a return journey, not just one way to the clinic. Enter the amount in Rands. It is unlikely that a patient usually travels by ambulance to their local clinic. In the event that they do travel by ambulance you must ask them whether they had to pay a tariff for the service and if yes, how much. Enter the amount in Rands in the space provided. The PDA asks this question somewhat differently. First ask the patient to select their usual form of transport using the visual aid. The PDA will then ask you, one by one, whether the patient travels by bus, taxi etc. When you reach the option the patient has selected, enter YES and it will skip automatically to a question about the fare for the return journey for that particular mode of transport. Enter the amount in Rands and press NEXT. The PDA will automatically skip to the question about travel time (241 ). A180 231 How do you usually travel to this clinic? Use visual aid to select a mode of transport. Choose one_{_Markbox with an_& Walk Bicycle Animal (e.q. donkey) Taxi 232 X -+233. Enter amount paid for return fare to clinic by taxi: R: 15 Bus 234 -+235. Enter amount paid for return fare to clinic by bus: R: Train 236 ->237. Enter amount paid for return fare to clinic by train: R: Private motor vehicle Ambulance 238 ->240. Tariff paid? Enter amount: (enter 0 if no tariff pai~ R: Other Questions 240 - 244 (Page 21) This asks about time away from home or work because of a visit to the clinic. It asks the patient about the total time spent attending the clinic meaning that we want to know how many hours it takes them from the time they leave home until the time they return home again (so called door-to-door time). This includes time spent travelling and the time spent at the clinic itself. Some patients may need to travel overnight to attend a clinic especially if they are coming from a neighbouring country (Lesotho) or province (Eastern Cape). You must ask these patients if they spend money on accommodation when travelling overnight. If yes, enter the amount in Rands in the space provided. You must also ask them to estimate how much they usually spent food and drink when travelling overnight. Enter the amount in the space provided. The PDA will automatically skip to these questions on money spent on accommodation and food and drink if you the "overnight" option for question 241. 241 How long does it usually take you to travel to the clinic and back home again (travel time + time spent at clinic)? Choose one (Mark box with an >Ó Overnight --+243. Enter rands spent on accommodation IR: 60 X --+245. Enter rands spent on food and drink IR: 25 Between 2 and 12 hrs \ ~. .. Less than 2 hours . : " .": , .., Questions 245 - 257 (Page 21) These questions ask whether the patient is usually accompanied when visiting the clinic. This is particularly important for elderly or frail patients who may be too unwell to attend on their own. Often, family members or friends take time out from their daily lives, including work, to take sick relatives or friends to a clinic. This has obvious cost implications as these people are missing work, and losing productive time at home to help. These are the costs we want to capture with these questions. Note that the word companion is used to denote the person who accompanies the patient to the clinic. It does not refer to the patient's spouse or partner. NB: If the patient is usually accompanied to the clinic the companion may actually be with the patient on the day of the interview and it will save time if you ask the companion these questions. Note that the companion might be waiting at the pharmacy tor medication or just outside the clinic. If the patient tells you that they are with someone on the day of the interview arrange tor this person to be called. Al81 If more than one person accompanies theiPa.tientto the clinic enter data for the main adult companion only. Question246 asks about the employment status of the .patient' s usual companion or escort. Go through all the options' on-the-list- .with the patient and choose one. Mark the adjacent box with an X. If the companionis employed you will then be asked to go onto the next block (questions 249 -257r Ifthe usual companion or escort is a student/learner or looking for work you must then proceed to ask the patient (or companion jf present) how many days on average they miss of either' activity when accompanying the-patient to the clinic, Enterthe number in the-space provided. Questions 249'~ 257 attempt to capturethe loss (either tM1!e'cOllmMion)lis!herself or to their employer) incurred by the companiQn'accompanyingihepátient to.the clinic. It first.establishes on.what basis.ïcasual, weëkly or monthly) the companion is employed. Choose one option and mark thee adjacent box. In the case of casual workers you must establish 3 facts-the 'average number of days worked per week, the average amountof money brought home for each day workêd and the typical number of days of work the companion misses in order to accompany the patient tothe.clinic. In the-case of weekly and monthlyworkers.you must estaplisp the amount brought hotnê.pcr week(or.per month) a.l14,.thely'pi~!iJ!lump.erof qf\Ys ofwotk the companion misses' in.order to accompany .the:patient'to'~e;clfnic. A182 VISITS TO OTHER HEAL TH CARE PROVIDERS IN THE LAST 3 MONTHS (Questions 262 - 467, Pages 22 - Jl) This section aims to capture the costs incurred because of attending other providers besides the clinic you are physically conducting the interview in. Other health care providers include all types of hospitals ~~Fc, Private and Mining), other primary care clinics besides the one you ate cmtdÏlcting the interview in, mobile clinics, workplace clinics, mine clinics, private doctors, traditional healers and pharmacies or chemists. When patients receive poor quality h.ealthc9,re.in primary care, they are forced to go elsewhere like hospitals and private GRs .. \ve are attempting to' capture the cost of recei ving care outside of the pii~ry,.c~ clinics.. There is provisi~mfor YOU to, enter ii visi'tsJb 'health care providers· (Heps) other-than the cliriié (you are conducting the imér'View ·ili:) In the last 3 m6ntJls; You. must therefore prioritise "big" visits like hospital adIÏlissions as these are very costly. If a patient has been to a pharmacy 5 times and admitted to the nearby hospitalonce, be sure 'to document the hospital admission and rather leave out one of the. pharmacy visits. Other 'big" items may-include VIsits to a-traditional. healer (where patients may spend a few days); If there are any visit to HCPs where the patient has had to spent a few days be sure to documentthe details for these visits. Each visit is recorded over 2 pages, and most of it is the same as the information collected for visits to "this'tclinic. Question 262 (Page 22) This asks the patient whether he/she has been to another health care provider besides "this" clinic in the last 3 months. Show the patient the pictures of the health care providers in the visual aid and ask them whether they have attended any of these in the fast J,months. If the patient says no, mark an X in th.e adjacent box and skip to q.!1estion 4:68. and .the top of page 32 (Care giver costs in the last 3 months). If the patient says ye~"il)dl~at('j this wlthcan;X'ii} the adjacent box and, establish what health care pro:vh:ler(s) he/she has been to. Remember.to prioritise hospitil,l admissions (this is usUa,.llyq\lÏt'e a dl'i!D:iatiCevent in the patieI1tJSlife and he/she usually remembers the details weil) and any-visit to, a provider where the patient was admitted or spent a couple of days. Proceed to question 263 and start to enter the details of this visit/admission. 2E>2.Have 'you'bêëh'to another heálth care provider beSiêl~:sttlis ellrilc:lrfthe'last 3 rnónths? YES NO IX 1_,!)qniplele questions 263 - 303{this page and the next p"ge).I ....s.Kipto q~ê~tiêln 468(ipp of page 32) Question 263 (page 22) First establish during which month the patient attended the BCP. Since all the 3 months time periods tor the survey' fall within 2003 there is no need to record the year. Mark the apptl'lpriate month by placing an Xln the adjacent space (February shown in the example below). The PDA will present. you with a drop-down list. Click on the selected month and press NEXT. Al83 medication he dispenses. The total charge is RrOG and the question is completed as follows: 270 Did the health (lare provider charge you for th!,tv[sitJ,adi,lission (consultation fee + medica~On)? YES I X I ...2...71. H()w much? (consultation fee + medication): R 100 NO I CN:;~:i;;:479. Ehter no. of days unable to work because CIflooking ,after,vou at'horne in the laSf3 months , Weekly ->476. Enler allerage amount.brought' home per week (after,dedtJclion6e~9,.tax) '-'.479. Ent~r·ho ..of:d::lysuhable,to work-because of looking .aftê(you·athbme'in the.'lasi3' months Monthly 471 ->{t8. E:i'I[êri~venig~,illfi'ounfbroug'hl home-per month .X .;iafi~rJdeduétioris e;Q;;taxi R650 _'4?~:.· Ei;ïiërn6: ó(d~y.s.una~le·to,workb.~cause'of·lookin9 aiter-.you in.tI:ie last 3'months 8 ECONOMIC IMPACT OF ILLNESS (Questions 484 - 504, Pages 33 - 34) These questions capture the literacy Ievel of the patient (important for interpreting heatth-retatedqualifycf'life data) and information of the patient's employment status and-work missed due to any illness. Qilestion.484 (Page 3J) This is important.irr terms ofinterpreting thehealth-related quality pflife data. You must stress to the pati(;!nt that we warïtto ·ki:tow llbóu! the ll\st grade/standard they passed at schooi. This may not necessarily correspond to -the grade/standard they were enrolled in when they left school. Mark-the appropriate option by placing an X in the.adjacentbox. 54 A185 Standard 2 or Grade 4 Standard 3 or G.rade 5 Standard 4 or Grade 6 Standard 5 or Grade..7 Siandard 6 or Grade 8 standard 7. or Grade·.9. Standard'8 or Grade 10 x Standard 9 Or Grade 11 Standard 10 or Grade 12 Questions485.-, 502 (Page 33) These questions are similar to those that you have ëncountérëd previously for companions 'to "this" clinici otf).cr HGFs, an4 Gary~Lv~r.s•. ]here· are some subtle changes. Bere we want-to know ab~liJthe total nliIrib\1r:Qfcia.o/s of wenk missed (or school missed, or d(iys looking for.work missed) in the last 3 months {illstead of days missed because of accompanying the patient to. the clinic/HCP or Icoking after the patient at home). We want to know about work missed because of {my illness. We do not differentiate between work missec;l because of a' resp-iratory problem vs. a non- respiratory problem or worked .mlssed for the reason the patient is attending the. clinic vs. work missed for other health reasons, Having said-this, we eo not want to kn:ow about work missed for any reason :b()sides ill health (e.g. leave, compassiónate leave to attend funerals ete). Since this is now the actual patient We. are talking about, we want their employment data in more detail. You will now be required to. complete average number of days per week worked (casual' workers), weeks per month (weekly workers) or months per year (rnopthly workers). You must also complete the average amount brought home per day (casual wqrkers); per' W~~k(,'\Y.eél{l_yworkers) or per month (monthly w<:)1;I<~rS): Firw'fly you must enter the fïunibei' of d~ys the patient has been unable to work because ofiHhess in.the last 3,'months. Remember you may only choose one option' (casual, or weekly or monthly). Then enter the above information for that.option, The FDA will first instruct you to ask the (employed) patient on what basis they are employed. Once you have established this, the ,PDA will ask you whether the patient is employed on .a easual, weekly Or mOIl1hly .basis. in. the form of a sequence of separate questions. When you enter "yes' to the; option the patient selected, it will automatically skip to the 3 questions A186 486 . Onwhat basis are you employed? Choose one'(Mark box with an X) Casual 488 -489, .Enter average no, of days worked per week .....490:.· El)ter:average amount brought home per day -(aftetCfeductions;e,g, tax) -'411'7, Enter'Tlo: ofday~ unable to work because of any illness iri;the'last.·3inonths Weekly 491 -'492. EriW ali9:tage nul)iber of weeks worked per month A~j: Enter ávElrage ~nioUnt brought home per week (afté'r.dédliêtiÓns:e:i!,taX) -'497, En\~r no, oUj~ys'unablê to work because of any illness in:the'last·j months Monthly 494 ->495, Enter average nUmber cif months worked per year 5 . -'>496. Entei'ailerage.ampuntbr.ought home per month x (áfter.de.duciions.e.g.Jax) R780 '-'497. Enter no; ofda'ys unable-to work because of any illness inthe last.3moriths 2 Question498 (Page 34) This asks the patient to estimate the amount ofincome they have lost as the result of not being able to work because of illness .in the last 3 months. Allow the patient to volunte.erthisinfórm!ltionspontaneously first. You may only choose one category. The example- below shows a patient who volunteers that he has lost R200 in the tast 3 months because of inability to work because of illness. Questions 503 - 504 (Page 34) 'Phis .asks the patient: whether they have lost 4job ill the last year as a result of illness. Note that the timeframe used here IS different to the standard 3 months used elsewhere, Ifthe p~tieÏlt answers yes, proceed to question 504 and enter the average amount the patient used to bring home in li usual working month. If the patient answers no, skip to question 505. The FDA will skip automatically, 503 In thelast year,. have ·You :Ióst.yourjób 'as'a~result'cif-anY illrïesa? YES I - goto the nextquestion Ouestion504 (Page34) This asks how the househeld-has: adapted in order to pay the medical costs. incurred by the patient. Read aU the options to the patient and.markall those' that apply. You will need to explain the term "assets" to the patient. Assets are any possessions (from A187 animals to appliances to clothes to m.ore s~bStantiaFjtems like houses) that can. be exchanged to redeem debt Fór example 'if th,ê'patient's household has had to sell their hi-fi ete to pay a doctor's bill, this is considered an asset and you must mark this option. In the event that the patient has not incurred costs on the household, check "not applicable" (you will find this as one of the buttons in the lower left of the screen on the PDA). 505 Questions·506 - 509 (Page34) These questions all concern HIVand, because of-their sensitive.nature, have been left to the end of the questionnaire to enable you to have established a rapport with the patient by this time, and so as not to compromise the rest of the questionnaire. The first question is really a gentle introduction to the topic, so that patients do not feel threatened by immediately confronting them with questions about whether they have been referred for testing ór even.tested, Even if the nurse simply provided education as to how HIV is transmitted, this is sufficientto answer:yes to this question. The.next question asks whether the patient was refer.reg for counselling and/or testing. Many clinics 'now have trained lay counsellors attachee).tothem, and.most nurses prefer-to refer patients-to them first for counselllng beforebeing tested, There are 2 methods.available at clinic.level for testing for HIV. The.first is the rapid test method 'which involves'putting a drop ofthe patient's blood onto a strip (similar to those- used to tesfl:>!boc:l.~ugi1n'ldf iabeties).and 'waiting 2 minutes.before-reading the result. This method forms part of the VeeT pr.ogranll1)e(Vólunta:r:yCounseUipg and Testing) and the strips should be available in most clinics, A positive result (the patient has HIV) is followed up with a conventional blood test where blood is drawn A188 from a vein in the arm and sent away to the laboratory. If the patient has had either of these methods of testing, you must answer yes to. this question. 508 Did you have an HIV test (rapid lest! fingerprick melhod or drawing of blood from your arm) at the clinic tOday? YES NO The final question establishes whether the patient has been tested in the past, and is the most .sensitive ofall these questions. Be-aware of this when you ask it, and treat the .response neLifraJ,ly. Questions 510 - 523 (Page 35) These ate the patient's contact details. Bear in mind that you are to schedule a follow- up interview with the :p~ient for 3 months from the date of this interview. If the patient doesn't arrive.' atthisfollow-up: interview, you will be required to chase up the patient. Complete and accurate contact details are therefore to your advantage. Remember this when collecting them. You will give the patient a.reminder card with the date of the follow-up interview on it. This card also "primes" the patient for the second interview, telling him/her that many of the questions about quality.oflife, clinic attendance ete will be repeated at this time. They will be asked to bring their regular medication with them in order to facilitate completion of the prescription section. ENI) OF BASELINE INTERVIEW A189 ANNEX 15-11 Part 2- First post-intervention survey training manual Al90 "FHtE F;IR!~E STA TE LW:~(S~:Ê~h.r·t:I-SURVEY RES1E:A'f,l(}:HTRAllNil:N'C; AN:D FIELDWORK M,AJNiWAL (Part 2) University of Cal1e Town Lung Institute D~par:tm_entGf C.()l11muni(tyHlêé:llth, Univêrsity of the Free State Centre for He.él'l~hServi'ces :Research and Development, University- Qf the Free State M,edical Re$.e,arch :C(i):Uflci'I, Cape Town April 20:O:S A191 CONTENTS 1. Interviewer Codes page 3 2. Sampling page 3 3. Editing Nates , , page 7 4. PDA: How te 4p1eac:al nd common problems.................. page 10 5. PUA: Wbento upl~ad , page 20 A192 1. INTERVIEWER COIDES Please find your individual interviewer code in the table below. When asked to enter your interviewer coe1~,el!lt~r the code.fer the climie in which you are working (2 digit code) firsffollowed by your personal- interviewer code (2 digit code). The PDAWil!,h~r,êll()'w'¥olJ'to pt0c.~ed;,ur:lJess you have entered these 4 digits. Rérme'r;lih)eIto·Write:'tffi~~ei:fdurdigit5 at-the top of each page in the paper questionnaire in the $,pa~~'pr(!)vit:led. INTER\tfËWER NAME TEAM 06 Q7 08 Nrateng-Sel;:ji QwaQwa 09 Thulani Ma;tibuko Qwaqwa HJ Baaseny,a.Mo.tikoe Bêfh'lehem 11 12 Agnes Mosia Bëfhl~l1.eh:l· Victoria Ramrnile BI,Q'eh1tc>nteiR- 15 16 17 Innocenli,aJ)uma 6.IQemfenteih 18 Dina,h, Ma,kgQ,e: Parys 19 20 21 Josh Nocancla Parys 22 2. SAMPUN$: HOW T0 SELEGT PATIENTS FOR INTERVIEWING BEF0RE CONSULTATION From .the Jasttr:ack queue,for ilLpatierits: • SelecfeYeJo/ patient who answers "¥es!' to: "lJlo,you have orhád you had any efiffic.ult breathing and/or cough today or in the last6 months?" • Excluc:1e patients Who ar~éli~arly toe ill to complete an hour leng , interview, Clear examples of patients who are t00 ill to participate are: o unsonseleus patients o patiéntsw,ho are not bre;athing o patienfswhoare,unable;to-talk o patients w.ho are psychotic A193 TB TARGETS CLINIC NAME LQCATlgN SAMPLE Ge:neral Patients on Patients TB treatment Tseki Clinic RiversicJ.e <::;Iihic 12 7 8 P:a'baIIQr;jQQlinic 12 12 2 43 7 39 11 B.efhl$hem 45 5 Ma. ..Haiq Clinic O'w.aQwa 43 7 Botshabelo PetruspurgCJinic Peffius,burg 46 4 42 8 37 13 38 12 Wepener: Clinie VVepenef 48 2 45 5 Pacys 43 7 P.t0< Clirti.C o 7 $,ásQlpurg 4'8. 47 3 Hili $tre:efCiJnic Kr00nstad 49 1 K-l\I1ail.e Clinic Both.Cclville Aloert Luthuli Clinic Wesselsbron 34 16 Boith,wsol7IQ Ocleodaalsrus 39 11 41 9 48 2 BoP,he.Ié;>.ng.G:linic Odéndacilsm$ 12 3eeisoyille' C:lini.c ..Kroonstad 4.0 10 I0ut.;difficult breath'ing, and/er C!Dugtl ~tóday or ih th-e la'sf6 months). Ask ev.ery 3rd patient who answers "yes" to meefthe interviewing team after their consultation with the nurse today. SELECTION OF PATIENTS FROM THE GENERAL QUEUE. WITH2 INTERMfE\IVERS Headeountfrom previous day S.eléct .... Patients who answer yes to (l1lsipjlityqtt~g/fe'~1\BTeêlcier)··anda more tho.rowgh screen after-the patient sees.the norse (responsibility ofthe interviewer). 2. Betere the patient sees the nurse they are selected fOJfwlther sereening by the team leader. All patients with C0t:19.1:l anW.orqifficult breathing qualify at this stage. This means that patients with difficult breathing alonequalify, as do patients with cough alone as well as patients with both symptoms. 3. Patientsmay have no symptoms on the day oftheinterview, but have had symptoms in the last 6months; This is particularly relevant when you are screening patients attending for TB treatment. 4. Note the headcounts used tework out yGur sampling strategy as well as tne f.i.e,qqeQuntfGrtne day of fiéldwork: on.tl'le'f0J"rli1prC)vided. This is the re~p·onsi9:ïlity orthe: netarri Le~~d~r~.ndshól.lldbe fihtd in the arch- lev.er·.fjle pro:vided. ·This'allows.usJo adjust,the data. if the patients you inter:Vi~w do ndt reptesentthe people attehding the clinic. What do you ëe if the He.adcount is not available? If the headcount is .unavailable estimate the number of patients in the queue by counting.the number in Qnef9W «;In(i:HnultlJ1)lyiI1th9is by,complete to interviews per day (when y.ou have 2·'intetv.iewers available) and 2,7 patients to complete 15 interviews per daY' (when you have 3 interviewers). What do you do jf you have selected insufficient patients on a day? You may find thatyeu haveped/started'smOking Questions 80, 85 and 88 Wh~n eht,~f:in;g the, y.~ariD. whic~,the:·Pélti,ently, 8. "Other" J'r!QéHpéitjQn: Questioms4al - 1'9'0 The "Other;' tvledk:atieo oril;)' applies40 the: "other' medications in your visual 'aid. If tile Pêti~nthas recEiivea medicatlon depicted in the "Other Meatcation" se.cti()A 0fthe vi~l'J~1ai,dyeu'm!-lst.gnswer yes., and .mark the medicationsdn th,e'r:T;1,tilti'"s,electlist~check all options that élPply). If the p~tiérïrhas.n~ttéc~!véÉ1 "Ott;J$r" medi,catiQns depicted in the visual aid, butbas,reG~ived qjfhe;r,rri~qip.~tióri (Le, mêd,icatipn'whiéh is not dEmiCfed in, the visuakaiCl), indicate: this clif\lic: in the last 3 months b~causewewilJ end up·dp,!Jbl~-'S<:ll;!ritifl'g·thv~li3i.ts'for' TB medieatien, Also, patië.rwhow the pafiërittvavelléC:f Jh~re··a.nq .wh&th.êr ~óyotlé acc"OrrU:iiatlié.d.him/hér. 12.Thn~j,uria~l~tq.vv,(),;k:f~r,~,of11J)~mi.p.f:l Q. ;.uëstions 2'58, 29~, 340, >'.'3'81,42,:2,463' Dutill'9 the fir$Uew days oteditih'g I Aqticed that some patients 'had res.P'(i)hdeclt~hat their cGpnpaniqr.1sh.a~t.ll'issed lijP to 2 days of work even thoW.@h·tt;,tveisit.*otlilfJ'cl.irHclot~'~F~I)rf.~'p,:I~f~d;]asletesds than. 1 day, .0.17 even l~sstha,n.2hp·tJrs. 'I:n ~~~~;;~:$'g~,plë!=iisepr:qbe the patient and/or companion if ava'ilaJiilete.en$ll!r~:,tt;iat,this inforrnédien is-correct e,g. "Are y(ju surelh~tiYou rilisSE3Pi;4,:d~y$dfwoi:k?Tfue visit only lasted a few hours?" lReffiTIerribertb,reGoi:d orilydaysofactual work missed. Days.of leave a'o nm cé,unt. Here I A0ticedtrna,lsome patients were responaing that they had lost mone,y imthe la,st·3 mont.tiisas a'resultof nOt being able to work, even though they had answered thaHhey were unemployed, and had not lost ajotD.ln the last year. If you do get such answers, make sure you probe carefully to establish what is really'going on in terms if their employment. A199 4. PDA: UPLOADING AND COMMON PROBLEMS PDA: HOW TO UPLOAD 1. Insert fully-charged rechargeable batteries (orange and green penlight batteries) into back of modem. NB: The modem has no means of showing you how full the batteries are, so ensure that you fit fully charged batteries before you upload. This will entail charging your batteries overnight. The re-charger will indicate when the batteries are fully charged (re-charger light will go green). 2. Take telephone line and insert jack into modem ensuring that you hear it "click" in. 3: Insert other end of telephone line into wall jack once you have disconnected phone. Again ensure that you hear this "click" in. Do not insert the jack into the telephone itself. 4. Insert PDA into modem so that the screen is facing you. Again ensure that you hear it "click" in. 5. Go to home page and select HotSync icon in centre of screen. A200 6. PDA will now display HotSync screen. Ensure that the "modem" button and not the "local" button is selected. When selected it will display a dark background and a telephone will appear on the HotSync icon. 7. Ensure that Palm Modem is selected. This is displayed immediately below the HotSync icon and next to a drop-down arrow. The toll-free number appears below this. 8. To upload your completed interviews click on the Hot Sync button located on the bottom section of the modem (not the PDA) in the centre. Alternatively you may click on the HotSync icon on the PDA screen itself. A201 9. The PDA screen will display the screen below while uploading your data to Cape Town. The average upload takes less than 1 minute for 5 completed questionnaires. 10. Do not press "Cancel" while the PDA is uploading. 11. When the PDA has finished uploading it will display the HotSync Screen again. 12. Press on the 2 buttons on either side of the modem to release the PDA from the modem. PDA PROBLEM 1: DIGITIZER (CALIBRATION) This occurs when the touch pad of the PDA screen and the display are out of alignment. The result is that the PDA will not select the button you have touched with the stylus. This can be corrected by resetting the Digitizer. This must be checked before starting an interview. If correct at the start, you will have no. problems during the interview. Remember the PDA buttons should respond to light pressure. If you having to press too hard, you may need to reset the Digitizer. A202 PDA will now display Preferences screen. A203 2. To activate the digitizer select the drop down menu located in the top right hand corner (by clicking on the drop-down arrow) and select the Digitizer menu item from the menu 3. The PDA will now display the digitizer screen 4. To complete this operation tap the middle of the target with the stylus. Continue doing this until the target disappears. You will need to do this 3 times (once in the top right of the screen, once in the bottom left of the screen and lastly in the centre of the screen). Once finished the Preferences screen will be displayed. A204 5. To return to the Home page press on home. PDA PROBLEM 2: LOST CURSOR Whenever you need to enter data (numbers, word etc) you need to make sure you can see the cursor. If you cannot see the cursor you have "lost" your cursor. The PDA will not allow you to enter data unless you recover the cursor. Below is an example of a screen where the cursor has been lost. 1. Reactivate the cursor by touching that part of the screen where you would usually see the entered data being displayed (see arrow on screen below). 2. The cursor will re-appear and you can then proceed to enter data. It will not re-appear if you touch the Graffitti pad. A20S Tap stylus here to re-locate cursor Do not tap stylus here PDA PROBLEM 3: SCREEN BACKLIGHT 1. The PDA can display the screen with and without a back-light. The back-light lights up the screen but uses a lot of power, meaning that you may run out of power in the middle of an interview and risk losing data. 2. You must ensure that the back-light remains off when interviewing. 3. You can switch the back-light on and off by holding down the power button for 2 seconds. A206 2. Click on the drop-down arrow next to "General" in the top right hand corner. A drop-down list will be displayed. Select "Date & Time". 3. The PDA will display the Date and Time screen as below: 4. Select the time by clicking on the actual time displayed. The PDA will then display the time screen as below: 5. Change the time by selecting on the hour button and using the arrow to increase or decrease until you reach the desired hour. Then click on A208 PDA PROBLEM 4: SETTING THE DATE AND TIME You can set the date and time on your PDA. This means that the correct date will automatically be displayed when recording the date of interview. 1. Go to the PDA page and select the "Prefs" icon. 2. PDA will now display Preferences screen. A207 each minute button and increase/decrease until you reach the desired minute display. Ensure that the AM/PM button is correctly selected. 6. Then click on OK. The PDA will return you to the Date and Time screen displaying your new settings. 7. Select the Date by clicking on the actual date displayed on the Date and Time screen. The PDA will then display the date screen as below: 8. Change the year by selecting the arrow buttons on either side of the year. The left arrow button will decrease the year and the right arrow button will increase the year. Do this until you have reached the desired year. 9. Change the month by selecting the desired month. 10. Change the day by selecting the desired day. Once you have selected the desired day, the PDA will return to you to the Preferences page. 11.Click on home to return to the home page. A209 4. SCHEDULE FOR UPLO.ADING We are in the process ofs~ttiï:lg up:a!:i~~~r;at~ totl-free line for each team so that each team has ac;ce~'$Jotbe~nr'1.~:i~V;ánytime and can upload data without encountering an ef).gag)~Glf($;t§Jjiálf1hese lines will be up and running by mid June. . ". . . In the irlterirm'We ..h.~ve2.lineS.~hicf:l'hWiU:~~~:i$]fuê~~~~j~~¥.j.6\X4rena~ms,. In order to avoid encouA~erj"r;lg,an' er;lgag~cd,sign ':. "..'.·.'~~fllJ~.~~Jhle.scAe.qulfeor uploading be'low, .The nUlll)1b,19ryoun'eed;' .·\id'i~'I;;:i.$:;~t.io~e~'d~,!i)rreIÓaodnetdoyour PDA. If you do en€ouhter an !3Á~~·g.~ds'i!ll~$f;'try. upJoad a little later. Team ..' tP.FT1- 3pm 4pm-4pm Team Parys (@ OSiZWeni Clinic;) Bethle.hem (@ Mar~kong CliniC') A210 ANNEX16 Follow-up training manual A211 J'~11fF:~~;E:s~~mi', LUlM:$: H1EALTH S~IiliJ,!It<:Vlm:Y Follow-up Ques:tionnaire Fiel:dw,o:a'!k"Mêi'llua,1 Univ~r$;ify ef C(l,p,~TáWrl LJjng InstittJte 1DE!;f1)álftm'e'nt of QpmiTt:l4nity,He.~U~hl,Hiiv~r$:itY of the Free State C:enffef()f Health Services Res.eareh and:Deve,lopl11ent, University Qt the Free State Medical Res,ea'rchCO.uncil JUly 2003 A212 CONTIENTS 1. General Comments on fieldwork completed to date 3 2. Common paA problems and hoW to solve them 5 3. Who'mustbe·'inte.rvi'ewed at'f()ilow-up? ...•~ ~ 7 4. Re..inler:v.iéw1n.g and qua'Ïity control ~ 0 8 5. C:ommon q.Qestionnaire errors ;............•..................... 0 9 6. The ·Work S.tud,y: , ~..t1 7. The·Foll()w~!JP ·Questio.nnaire explaine:d., 1'6 lotêl"'ii.eWêt e:o'de$.~.....•..... ~ ; 17 Path~l;l,t,G).eta'ils·" , o 0 0 0 0 0 ••• 0 17 Tran~itioi.¥~beir1a,ng 'efflil:ient int~,rvl$,wer. A gqo(;/i(ltewiéwer slows this process db,Wn.~i\iing ·the pati~ntefloughtime to consider the questions being asked arid, how to responq. ' My concern is that the efficiency oftM PDAtempts interviewers to rush patients through the interview, pr~ventillg.them from having time to consider questions .and responses. Remember that patients may feel intimidated by the technqlogy and yoUr sPeed on it, ~n,Q,feel. pushed tq respond prematurely to 'q.l:Ie$tibA,S".Iris up to'you te> creaté the~sensethêWou have .all day to intervieW me P!3tient, and.'ihaty,o~ qre;r,~CI,lIyjnteres.te(jl:iowhat they 'have-to say. Ger.itlePtbbing ("Ar~yotlstlrer?~, "Db Yóu need timétothihl< about it") slows down the pace ofthe interview. The, baseline and follow"up interview should take ao less th,an30 minutes. If you do take less thanthts, you need to 'reconsider your interviewing style and whether the patient was not being rushed. The. tem,ptátion to ru~h throughlhé que$tionlJ,;;'ire wil,l be greé!t d:uring the follow-up, p~;r-tlyI;>~q,a\'ls~th' ere Willl;ié a qu~,lilf¥:'Qfp~tiem~ Wa,iti,l1I.tgo, be inteNiewed by 'you, {since the patients'v.iiii:rriostly,·'be-comimg I;)a'ek:tottre clinic only to s,eeyou) élnd l'1artly because-the' patientwilFbe familiarwith most of the questions. Be very conscious abouttakl'ng timete ihterview. A214 MONDAY READINESS The fieldwork has many logistical considerations which need to be sorted out before Monday morning and the start or fieldwork in a new (or in the case of follow-up, old) clinic. A disproportionate n,uITtlberofinterviews complete(jholilJi),~fPeTarecGnducted on Monday,s tlll:am.al?y'0~herdayof tAewe~k, :R~P,l:~,~iGl~e,§ti(Di'ilnaires·ifl~ur many costs (addill<)fliil:'eEJitingt,ransp0rtba,ck~t0;ë.ap~.'itb'lv,r;:id',~{!3camuring etc.) which c0uld'háve been avoided with thé PDA. Gommon· excuses for completihg interviews brl.'paper are: 1. Le,!3vingP0,A.~;~th0Fhe. 2. HA'PIbein~'erased off the PDA (See P[)A problems) 3. PlJAs i10tbeing cbé:u;ged. Please ensuretbatyourPDAswill be arthe clinic onthe Monday (even if another member clthe Team has t~kenthem hoiT1$Jorup,loading), thatthey have been charged anCiLthatyou carry the power lead and extension set with you (so thatyol,l, canchafQ.e them at.the clinic: if necessary). GOo.D CLINICS AND SAD CLlNIOS Many (Myouha.'Ve remarked' on.the servicesavailabie-at-tae clinics used for fieldwork.,.especially if they haV:e;beenpeer. It can beverytempting to become:Jrvvolvedin.a debate-with clinic staff about poor ql,Jality.,s~tiiices>ê$pe~iallywheny,o.ubave been exposed to different levels .Qfsérvites ,atdirfereJit clinics, Vou must resist this. Remember you are there-to observe and document. Ifnursing staff become aware thaiyouare uaimpressed with the services previded at the clinic, you risk being treated as hostile and you risk changing the regular practices of the clinic for thefdtiration of your fieldwork. Remember that you are there to capJure theclinlc's usual practice, no matter how go,odor how bad. Retaining the. status of.an objective observer improves the validity of your observations and ultitnate,ly.their ability. to change practices in the future. A215 COMMON P:IDA PR€>:Ia.Tt.EH'MESM .AND HOW 1'0 S~OLVE Most of these were inCluded in Part 2 of the Baseline Training Manual distributed in the. firs:tweek oUieldwork. Subsequently a few problems have been raised. Thisare be covered here, t. LOSING HAPI Sev~ral.Jiel~V\f,0rkEarshave hé!cLthe urif()rtunat~ e)(p>~riE:lD~beJ having HAPI erasedfrom theirPDAs. This can be caused by2 prOblems. The first is that the PDAhas' been, stbred'withafl~tbattêW, S'eme power is required to prevent the programmes loaded ,dr:itp tt.ié I?J:DAJr:om being erased, Aftér approximé!tely one week a P:IDA with ad'Ját: fuattery will erase the prO£lrai:nrnes (including, any compieted interviews whiGh have not yet been uploaded). Please ensurethat.the PDA is stored fully charged. The second reasen is thc;JOhe,res:etbuttQO has been. iriGlqVerlentJypi,;lshed. Thé resefbutton is a very ;stnall bQttqA rêcessed bh the: back ofthé !?DA. Ycu need 10 .stick' a .pencil or sharp' object int0 it to push it Pl;Jshing the reset button wipes Qut any programmes (inCluding any cempleted interviews whiCh have not yef been uploaded); Children are often tempted to.·push. sh,arp objects into tiny holes and sa mus! not be allowed to play with your' PIDA. ,SO~,bóW.'do{you:a.V;()iCJWAPJfj:óitt'b,é'iflq"e'aseiJ,'frorn :\fOl1f'PDA? Never push your reset button, Never give your PDA to someone 'else to. play with. U,pload as qften as possible so that if your battery does run out and erase H~PI, you have not lost-any completed interviews. Store your PDA charged. Dqn't store 'your PDA! (lJse the iélddress beck, the diary ete fer yeur own personal use) Infor-m the MRG as .sopn 'as YOu detect that HAPI has been deleted from yeur PDA Monday merning atthe clinic is too late! 2. UPLOADING:PROM A TELKoM PRE~PAIDPHONE Some fie.ldv(e»fKers,hél,ve enoount~.re.d d,ifficulties when uploacjing, from a pre-paid Telkom 'phone. This is because the palm requires-a completely "open" line and the prepaid system requires that you enter a pin number after dialing the phone number. This "pin" system can be disabled by completing the following steps: A216 1. FromtheTelkom-pre-paid telephone, dial *#55 2~Press 3 for Personal Options 3. Fellowthe voice prompts to disable the pin cede. A217 Everyone )Mho was interviewed at baseline! MQst of you have asked the patients to return to the clinic for the follOw..,upinterview. If a patient does not return to the clinic it is your re,$pon$ibiliWto trace, the patient (to their home if necessary) during the week O:f'fol{q.w."'qp>fiélc:lWork. There r:Til~ybé. §'OJlB~"R~tightswt:l0·.ha:y,~.i~,'~·jlW,::' g:;ft;W~;~l ,rTil.ui'rlt~rwi~w these patients after their corl~ult~tiÓIÏ' áma d<(p:QQA:ï,~@t tfje,det~.iIS ot tni~ vi$it (aha any medi,catibn prescribed ± pafient satisfádion~with the consultation)" A218 RE·4NTERVtEWlNG AND QUALITY CQ'NTROL This section is included to remind you of the re-interview,ing process which, together with ecHting,comprise the quality control measures designed to ensure consistently high quality data. 20% of all patients should be re-intel"llieW~d~s$ul'lJi.mg..thc:ittAe.average fieldworker intewiews' appJoxirnately $ipatLër:,tsp',eri;I~~:Y,I~fj't!;1edAterviewer interviews more than this nulTibêr, tne'r;:ïl:JJr\!i>er,(:)f'p!:iti,$rrei!-tiSnterviewed rises accordingly. ' The questions'te b~,,~sed-:fc:>:rre'Yiht!$)¥I~Y\titJgi'árre'ip.)'$7q~~$rrnir;reds;ataHrtheo,f every newIT:l0:rlth;:offi~!owoF~,aI11P;idi.stfii):liit!idztQ;Jfu$;'$~~~b;ii,$lt.~ils'isth·;e reSp0f1sil?ility"ol'fmé,t~alTi Lê'?id~rlO'1ê'h§.~:i(M~ :)~tttl~yH~vê;'S11!T]fl'Gicéoj;pjties of the new re-interviewing questions before starting ,any new fieldwork. Please bear 'in mind that differ-ent-questions will 'be' used for baseline and follow-up questioanaires .and that some teams will complete both baseline and follow-up iriter.views during.the, same month. Team Leaders mustplease ensure that they have copies of the, re'-interviewing €Iuestions for both baseline and fQlloW-up ihterViews. The re",iMt~rv,iewin.g;,r;e,spoose~:I11l!)st:pe"c()rnapareg'wthiteAoriginal,Je.~ponses arid any (ji$,~r:~P.:êACied,.Si$:élfjs:s:~Wd itt'rtlir~,rële¥a,nt iritetv,iewer. This preeess offeedback is meéinfto serve-as a:rneams,for.discussimQ},thequestionnaire anEl,waYS to, irnprbvecthe réliabiiitY of,resp,c:ms.es(allowin9 patients more time to cOl1sidei'their fes.ponsé§ï rrlorê tnoJo!,:lgA pFobing etc.). The feedback pr;ocessilityofthe team Leader to ask the .superviser for these original responses. What:db~\W.ë,'idb,df..;tl:ie4)atiént;qa\ié2th.(MnterViewe"éind:tlle. learn Lea,der e/lfferentJiitiswets;;to,'iHe:sarné':qiJê-stl.6ii? Manyq,uestions' have.whatweeall-a Ipw test-retest reliability. This is because, on reflectien, the patient may have revised his/her answer (~.g. durattsn ofsymptoms). The Team Leader should explore discrepant answers with the ihtérviE;wet, blJtbe'awa~e thatsemetimes the patients may really have gi:ven them' differeAt answers. Questions about dearly defined facts Oike date ofpirth, level' of education ete) have a hi§h test-retest reliaBility and should not differ. A219 Taking armpit (axill~ry) not-erel (mol;Jth:}Jemperatures. Recent intakeof a cold beverage. Loose fit of the thermometer under the tongue. Not waiting for the thermometer to complete the reading(taking it out of the mouth befóreyou heara "bleep" !;;o.!,md). If y0U.do encounter a S!!l~nQrrliiê!F~~mp.:ê~a.t:u.t~N::ilea.$·é,:F$f.t¥itl'pkF.~.~fera~ly with a second ·tl:l~rrnofTléter. If;pér;!5i§te~(I~·,i(j~YQm':m·~Y;~l'1te[·tnë:,$ul:hnormal reading. . Questions whieh ask about similar "thingslJ (paper -and-PVA) Some. of the"questiqns in the intervieW seem very simnar. This is deliberate and desiqned.to testthe lo·g.icof the-respenses (er-whatwe refer to:as "internal consistency"). Logical responses can be improved' by rernemb.ering lDa.tie.nfs'lDteVious responses, (Q.4i1dY: I>a· viSq:a:p1iCftJte,Pf:ttl:e:pa.tient.?!1~their he,álth in your miMd as you interview) and probing when faced with inconsistent reeponses. For example if a,~atient reports that. he his chest problem has interfered with his usual actiMities.Jrr,the;last-month (Symptom S.everity in the last month), you wqulq .e,*péê,tJ~~J;,~~·WouIQi;fep,Rtl;;,~f91ïi'em$,wit.hu.shui~a.l ~ctivitiesduring'the health#el'ate~tq!Jality.óf;lifeJFl·.theJa~t,rilo'nth.secti0n. l.fhe.dGesn'Jitis'yOiJr resPQhsi_i:)iliW·to,p>:toa.lnDdé'a$'kwhy nQt/sihêe,ine has"8'lfeadytold you that he has had prOQIï;lms, This r:eq'ui'resthatth$ in{erviêllVer be very f~miliarwith the questionnaire in order to identify inconsistentresponses and investigate. Reasons foratten.dance (clil1ic.and oth~r Hep visUs) (paper .and PDA versions) If you choose to enter the patient's reasen foratténdance under the "other" 0ptic),!1p, lease>provid.e specific informatien. See' instructions under the. "Follow-up Questionnaire Explained" for further details (Pé3ge27). Employment Status You' may on ly cheese one option to desctroibe the employment status ofGQh1p~niën$to this clinic" c0rnpc;mic>rlsc oth~tHPRs, cate~~iversand the patient him/herself. Many fi.eldworke,rshave éhe,ck~:m0re tAan .Or-leoption. Choose the option that best fits tbe-patient's description ofthéir employment status, and which has the greatest potential to be affected by illness or by accompanying a patient to a health care provider. A221 C.O'MM.QN'fMISj1[~;~ES:·MA£;)(:IN TH:(:'.BAS'JElINE QUE'STIONNArRE These are included here because there are many similarities between the baseline and follow-up questionnaires. Identifying features written at the t9pofpages (p~p'ervetsion.only) Please ensure thát.the.patient's initials, date ofintervi~W; di'Mic'and interviewer cede are clê~Fly'entered at.the.top ofëac~ !?l:ig,t?,oft~epaper questionnaire. B~' sure, to write the ,full name .Qf-theclirriieáS;;SQFi1e"Clinics (Botshabels B, U & S, J fOf example can be:easily corifuse iiL) Patient 'initials. (paper version onl}') Initials often dornittally with .the patients' first,and last narnes or only one letter has been filled iri. Initials = the'fir$t letter ofth,e p~tienfs,firstlChliJ~êth'~'djgilal'~átêhptoYia.~,d (~(:>tir;i1ethe..:re'&piratory rate') to time',;fhe,conswitation. N'otê"tl1eHime:the patient enters anddeaves1;)E" F."'\"iL;I;'L'"",:-"\iO;;11\V:A'¥'_'I:' 'u' :-p' Q.'L,J,,,,~r.::,S' 'T'IO"' ' 'N.. ';N' HA:<'!I'"R,iE'C, ::~E.V~:_P' .L,,A;~'I,II(I',~iE: "'D--,' BEFORE STARTING . " You will notice that the numbers thaté!ppe.arn~and seem to foll(;jWti:9~',$iiSW,eleGted. For tb !1'Freaspn-the.·q,qesti(.lfl$f:)pp~'é3rnQr~',$tr:~i9f\tf.~rw.~(~o; ri t~e ,PblA as all no.n'\aP'Pljc~ple0.p.tioh$'ate "h'i.cjdenj, er data to be captured-and poeled with the other P[)Ad~tayou l.JPló?id. TIME FRAMES The 'tiliT1e.fr:arnet.o wh:icfu· ~Q~,tqUes;tle~s .réfer IS the period between-the, 2: interviews; flrOom lffe.,iti.o.m~nt.t1Je"p~.(;(jhtleft the' b,aseline.interView until the .start of-the fo1iow~up,JnteNie.w. This r:nei:lnsthatiquëstions.abQut refën:~:lIsi'sputum tests etcapply to ever:y:thjn~l,tla~rha$ h~p'per:te,d!jntne geriod. b,etween the 2: interviews. ,For example yo~willb,e,teqqi(é'd'lq.capt0t$dëtails olvisits, refetrá'lsetc~ fer patients who., ~fter,tf:ié)fïr§t.lnterviêW; wete transferred immediately to hospital. You will also bé. req,ui$d'to capture. a:n the d~t~ilsofany tests-or iriv~stigatiohs completeHaig,Clinic 17 MarakonQ·Clihic QwaQwa t9 Mpoha.di Clinic Bethlehem 20 Nall1atilali 0Iir1i,c QwaQwa ,2t Osizweni Clinic Sasolburg 22 (replaced with Sasolburg Town Clinic) Pa.ballOn9 Clinic QwaQwa PAXOiinic Viljoer:l'skroon' 25 Phahé;lméng;Glihic Frankfort .26 Pt:l0m.~I.d,niLC.liniC 27 Phuthaditijha:bél 28 Seeisëville ,Clinic iêaridél PC!rvs 22 A229 PATIENT DETAILS Page 1 : Questions 3 -10 First enter the patient's first name, surname, gender and folder number. Take care when entering the folder number, transcribing 2 - 4 digits at a time. You will be asked to enter the folder number twice. If not folder is available you may leave this blank (but only if you really have made a concerted effort to locate the folder). If you really can't locate the folder, you may click the "N" button ("next") on the POA or enter the patient's full date of birth. Please attempt to locate a unique identifying number on each folder, as we will be tracing laboratory results for patients and therefore need their folder numbers. If in doubt ask the clinic clerk to help you locate the folder number. Questions 8 - 10 Patients were considered for the study if they were 15 years or older. The year of birth (or age at last birthday if the patient is unable to remember the year of their birth) is one of a few information elements (including name, gender and folder number) which enable us to identify patients so that we can compare how they have changed from one point of data collection (the' baseline questionnaire) to the next (the follow-up questionnaire). You must enter either the year of birth (if known) or the age at the last birthday. The POA will skip age at last birthday if the year of birth is entered. If the patient doesn't know the year of their birth click on the "0" button ("don't know") and the POA will default to the age at the last birthday question. It is not necessary to complete both the year-of birth and age at last birthday on the paper questionnaire. 8 Do you know ltie year of your birth? YES I 19 I ....E.nter year of birth & go to question 11: NO Ix 110 I -> Enter age at last birthday & go 'to question 11: 46 TRANSITION ASSESSMENT Page 1: Question 11 This question asks the patient to compare their health on the day of the follow- up interview with their health 3 months ago on the day of the baseline interview. It is what we term a "transition assessment". First set the scene for the patient: "Remember when we last spoke to you here at the clinic 3 months ago. Think carefully back to that day." A230 Read all the response categories ("Better', "The same", "Worse") to the patient slowly, pausing between each one. Ask the patient to choose one category. Mark the box with an X. You must give the patient time to consider their state of health 3 months ago, their state of health today and how it has or hasn't changed. This exercise requires "intellectual gymnastics' and cannot be rushed. Remember to create the impression that you have all day to complete this interview. This will put the patient at ease and allow him/her to think back to the day of the baseline interview. If a patient is quick to respond you may want to probe with comments like "Are you sure", "Have you had enough time to think about it?" Encourage the patient to take their time when giving a response. SYMPTOM SEVERITY IN THE LAST MONTH Page 1: Questions 12 - 17 These questions are a repeat from the baseline questionnaire and ask about the frequency (this means how often something occurs) of chest symptoms during the day and at night and their impact on the patient's usual activities. Please note that the time frame for these questions is the last month. This refers to the last month leading up to the follow-up questionnaire. You must emphasise this to the patient. If the patient answers yes to the questions you need to prompt the patient with the three response categories (1 to 2 times per month or 1-2 times per week or most nights/days). After prompting the patient with these categories allow a silent pause and time for patient to think and then answer. If necessary, repeat the response categories. Questions 12 - 13 Difficulty in sleeping can occur because of many reasons including waking up frequently to pass water. Patients who have difficulty sleeping specifically because of difficulty in breathing and cough must answer yes to this question. Patients who have difficulty sleeping for other reasons must answer no to this question. If necessary probe to clarify that the difficulty in sleeping is because of difficulty in breathing and/or cough and not for other reason? (itchy skin rash, loud music nearby etc.) A231 The questions are first~sk:~d{0r. the state ofthe páti~mts'health on the day of the-follow-up- interview al1d~,thena,tiënt ánd á"()Vdh'~ pi(tiêhFti.rTlé,i-tQ,cf,gé,sf'andu'nderstancFthem. _The patient must indicate to youwnlcn bi~ck';b~stdescribeSJheii" hl'!!'llth status. If thêy feêl th.~t none oHhe:th~ee';statérr\~nt~'aCC;:.lJratelycaptures theirhealth status: and-that ratnerthey fail"s0mévJh~re',in between, twó.statements., they may choose the block- between those two statéments as shown below. Example: A patiemt with mobility problems who feels he .falls between "no problems" and "some Ptobll'!mS:'. MOBILITY 18 n o ·0 r o I have noproblemsin Ih'1ves.qmeproblems In walking Iam .c6tiiïlfined.towalkifl9·~bout id .about . A233 Have you had difficulty sleeping because of difficulty in breathing and/or cough in the last month? 12 YES NO Select a cate 0 Interviewer: Choose ONE. Mark bo ith 1 - 2 times er month 13 Questions 14- 15 This question asks about the frequency of chest symptoms during the day. Chest symptoms include cough, wheeze (whistling sound in the chest) and breathlessness (shortness of breath, tight chest). If a patient reports any of the three symptoms in brackets, you must answer yes to the question. It is not necessary for patients to have all three symptoms to answer yes to the question. Have you has your usual chest symptoms during the day (cough, wheeze, breathlessness) In the last month? 14 15 QuestIons 16·17 Usual activities include work, study, housework, family or leisure activities. If the patient has been limited in any of these usual activitiës by their chest symptoms in the last month, you must indicate yes. Has your chest problem interfered with your usual activities (e.g. work, study, housework, family or leisure activities) In the last month? 16 YES NO e2) Select a cat 1 -2 times 17 1-2limes Most days HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE Pages 2 - 5: Questions 18 - 29 These questions measure how health problems impact on different aspects of daily life, specifically on mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. There are two parts to measuring the quality of life, the first part is to ask how health problems impact these specific areas and the second part is to ask a patient to give an overall rating on their general health related quality of life (on the scale which resembles a thermometer). A232 You may not explain the wording of the response categories to the patient because you risk introducing your own set of values into the question. What we want to know is how the patient pescelves their own quality of life and not how they would judge themselves compared to other people's standards. If the patient asks you what you mean, repeat the categories word for word. You may not give any examples as this will lead the patient and compromise their answer. This is particularly relevant to the pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression question where patients are asks to distinguish between moderate and extreme states. It is up to the patient to decide what he/she considers moderate and what he/she considers to be extreme and then choose. Giving examples misleads a patient and disrupts their own process of deciding what they believe to be no problem, moderate and severe. The PDA does not allow sufficient screen space for you to view the response categories as whole sentences. For this reason, and to help the patient visualise the exercise, we have laid out the full versions (in all 5 languages, bothfor quality of life today and for quality of life in the last month) in the visual aid. Please use this to complete these questions. Also, the PDA does not have a system whereby the blocks could be easily depicted on the screen. We have therefore compromised and inserted "dashes" between statements to depict those categories which fall between statements. The same patient with a problem with mobility falling somewhere between "no problem" and "some problems" would therefore be depicted on the PDA as follows: A234 Questions 23 (to.day - Page-3) atld 29.flast :mon-th --,Page 5) This,question is designee tE) assess the patient's dve~lrhealth related quality of life using a "thermometer". Expl'ain to the petient-tbstat-tbe bettorn of the thermometer is theworst slate thatthey can imagine. Be sensitive to the fact the patient might imagine this state as being,worsethandeatb. This will differ from patient.to' patient. Clnd so do not jIIuslr;ate this E:)ntffbf:the s~l~ with examples like death 'Of extrem.e suffer;lhg~It is up to the patient (aAd not you) to deGidewhatfhey think is:theirworststate of health.; , . Explain to toe.patientthar at the 'top of the thermometer is the best state that they can imagine. Be sen_sitjv~ctQt~eJélctJDe;patient;might ir:n~gi,nethis state as being l'il~tt~rthaI'! nqrtri_al.This will' differfrorh p~~ient.t(:)patient and so do not illustrate .fhis·endottf.le sG:aleWithexamples like b,éimgcfilledwjtbvitality and en~[gy. It is lJP to the Pêlti~Qt(an,(j ,rl()t you) to,oeeide whatJl1ey think is thei r best state .of' health. Be sensitlee to' the facl th~t""nonTral;' f()r the p~fient may be>a,nyW'hereon this scale. Do not sl1,gge$t te),Jhe patient tbath.alfNva,y between tbe"2, p'Q;n(s (reading::: 50);inflii:at~s "nom#J/". Ifyqu <;Jbthi$.Youwill findthat.m0st patients choose 50. IHhe patientrequires clarification, rather say something like "normal for you may be anywhere on:this scale". After e*plaining how the, scale w,orks>tothe;.patient"ask the patient-te imaieate to the point on the §.~ale,'W.t:lg,r;~~th~Y"fé~I;P,êsrQ~sptibheoSw th,~y fe$1 tolll,ay. On the 'P,élP~r'q,l:I~$ti~.flna.ireriTl:élr;~,this;pl,i'swhhetherthe,patient has retumed to the clinic during the period betwe.en the :2 interviews; ,including 0n,the day ottbetcllow-up assessment, and take into :accQu.ri~.,wh~JhéYrOq ~re \1on9Wcting'the interview at the clinic, or at lhe patient's Mme. Y0u'will be' teq,uir.edto trace patients who' clon'tr:étwrn to the, diriic'fofthe folloW-Up'irit~rV!ieWto their homes if neeessary. Note tbat.veu are required to record tl~r.eonly the details of visits to the exact Same clinic,where the Péltiéntwas initially recruited. Ifthe patient has been to a ê.ifferent Clinic!duringthe'peri0db.etw~efl interviews, y0uwill.recordthe dêt~il~ ofthO$'e \llslt$ ung~nhe seqti'ort: "Visi(S tb othér h,éalttj care providers besides-this clinic". . . : We'ceHec{ irif(jrmati0[) en the\élvail~biHty (jftbecclihic folder aNhetitl1e'of the inteTViewbecause, intel"i.ïewscwherey0u have been able to use the patient's folder to cheek-up on vi.sjts bélCkto the clinic, tend to contain more reliable information than when you have, not had access to the folder to check up on details. A235 Question 30;(Paa_e·6) In the event that-the p:ati~ntw,upthe patient at h()mec The phrasing of future questions asking wl;)E!ttier-the.patient has returned to'.the clinic between interviews déj:>êr\dsbfnvnêreyou are conducting thefóllOW-up interview. Choose one option-and mark the box with an X If you are cOnducting ille interviewat the patient's home s~ip the next2 questions and conti.nue~with que_stion33 (same paqe). If you are conducting the iritervie'IVatth~ Clinic proceed,to the next question. Inle.lVlëwer: Are you·c~lndU.êti(lg:ttiis iriisiVlew at,the páiient's home or atthe ciiiiié? Choose 'ONE. Mark':box with.anX. 30 Af Uie.patienfs home I I - skip to question 33 (this pagë) At the clinic I X I ~'gi:l'to the next question Question 31 tPagé 6) ThiS question estaglishes whether a P::itient, b~ing interviewed. át the.clinic, has been back to-the dinlC forany ffl;;'$On :betweenthe2 interviews. Remempet th.~tsonii3,p~tiënts'cmé;'tY't>É:l'?tten9!btglj'e êlinic'fqrcare as well as for the fbllow'-'up intërview, .These patients must be·intérviewecl after they have seen the nurseldoctor so that-you. can capture the details of that consultation. You must indicate-no ónly iHhe pé;ltienthasA'tbeen back tothe élinic'at all between the Q Interviews, ~nd:is,only at the clinic for the purpose of the foHow-up inter:view, If the patient has been back to tt;,eclinic at all, even if only to qbllect mediéfition' (withoutseeirig a nUr~e/<:!oGtorV) Ol! must lndlcate.yes, If'tRepatietit has not been bae~ to the clinic at all, you must-skip all the que~tic?ns about G.arereceived ·aU.h.eClinic in the, last 3 rnqhths and proceecl to question 156;,at-thetop:ofpage 14 (Patiemtswho have-rrot been back to. the clinié.iri:the laSt3month$), riicrudlng;t.O:l!á~;,~a:v~:yo~ue.e.iï);ïl!¥k/~oJheclinic (to collect ineds, for á'check;uPi to'set) a nurse'i)r'doctor'!ê§:r1n the last'3:riiónthS,aftero·ur:ffrs·t·inter'l.irm? 31 Interviewer: Indicate NO. it.the patient has not been back lo the ctlnlcatter the first. interview and is attending the cliQi~ today ONLY for the ouroose of.the·interviewl. yes I x I ~ go to uie nexlqu.ëstiori Question 32, (Rage ·6) Thisasks'y:oMq'Confirrn .inJhe'folderJbé;'tFthe.p::itiënt ftas been back'to the clihic in the 'ast 3.mo.riths. R$rn$.r:iib.erthat we treat information about' clime visits ete, as being more reliablewhen it has been double-checked with fólder entries. If ttie folder is aVéÏHableplease chéék tHattt;,e patient-has been baCk to ~he clinicafterthe báselil1e,intel¥iew, Iftne fOlder90ntgins np :docurnentation cf a visIt .d. urihg··thiS:tiiTié,pe(io~!;;pl~l:Is(f prob..é'Jg~'8atiêh~ ·~~·ol,lt,éX~~tIY)Wnétl· helshe' returned-to the·'c1inic, Bear irrrnirrd tht:Rthe patierit maywë".h.ave A236 returned to the clinic between interviews but that the visit may not have been documented. It is Worthwhile noting.the number of visits after the baseline interview documented in the· folder. This will. assist you when later you are required to enter the details of all visits betweeri interviews. Interviewer: Have you confirmed In the folder that the patient.attended the c::liril,: in, thEl'Iast'3' months aïtertne first interview? 32 YES I,X NO I Question j3.mage 6J Thlsquestien establishes whether a patient, being interviewed at.home, has been back to the clinic. for any reason between the 2 interviews. You must indicate no only iftre patie.rithasn't' been back to the clinic at all between the;2 intérviews. If'the patient ,has been pack to the. clinic at êlll, even if only to collectmediealion (without seeing a nurse/doctor) you rnust.indlsate yes. If the. patient has not been 'back.tothe clinic at.all, you. must Skip all the questions about care received .at the.clink: in'th~ last. 3 months and proceed to question 1'57 at-the-top of page 14 (Patients who have notbeen back to the clinic in the lastS; months). Have:youbeen'back.to the-clinic iri·thë:.:lasf3··montlis;~ftei"~óurfl.f:St:lnlêrJiiew? 33' YES Ix I - gcitO 1l1:EInil¥1 g~i(~tion; N.Q I I·....; sRip.ito Questión :lS7':(~ge 14) Question ,34 (Rage '6) Here you'are required to capture all the-details ofever:y visit ,back to-the clinic betwei:in ~1:iE!'2'irit;ëri\liew,sir;iCl~i:ling.C!ny;-visitson..tbé day ofthe, interview itself (hence the importance of interViewing,these patients after they have been seen-by the nursëïëcctor). As·with the -baseline.,interview,;yo.u dO not have to record the details-of visits to collect TB iTJedica,ti,P.ol:,ls·yqu will onIY'l:!e·,aIJpwedto capture tletp'ils for 8 visits. Patiemtswh0'areb$ingtr~ated f~r'TB are likely to have-attended the clinic more than 8limes' in a:'3·mon.thperiod." . You- can use the foiderlo help the patient remember the number of visits back to :the clinic during the 3 nïOnthperiotl. Again pear in miOd that.some pages may he missill9, and'thal some visits .rnay not have been documented. Enter the; number óf times the.patient" has been back to the clinic between interviews (but-exclude visits to collect TB medicafien). For t31fwh¥ they came to,the, clinic on,a.p.articular d'a¥. Do not.betermJ§téd;'tiSl,:res:ortto the patienti:iotes. ' Try to q;~aHwellldes as .far as .PQs$,ibJe".Forex~rnRI~."t0·Coll~crmedication" is very n0fl:,sP'e'9if:i'B'~MeFg~$1'10, c(:)llecta?}hm:a rned[~~~ipn"pro~lidéS very seeclfie an~e~~€t inf.oJ'T;tra~iQans to the.,re.asPFIfor ,~lf,en~~9m®. $imilarIY, "check-l1P"i$,: al~o v.~ry m0n"~pe.:Oifi'oWh$r,e.~s"9n~QI:<7C!p:f.(i)rA'1::~i~I(f)r:ho.~, ' pressu rë~pr,ovia:es·eXaët::refi~blé, data. This Qfte.n r~(:f~j~~s~jp't~t)'Ii:lg"the'patient for more infbrrna'fiql't·;;ïnd:is,.'the. hallmark' ofa:qpálified af;l'cf~x~êrit+nt~:rVi~wer. RememberthattmthaVh~/shé sáw' :6.tily./á"n, urse or' a dQctor'on that occasi~n(uf\r:e you swteP;', "Qiril you Apt'also see-adsctor?", '~Didyou not also see a' n~i±$e?"). You may c:hp~$éone option. Markthe relevantbox with an X and proceéd to the nextquestion. The neoot'qqe~tiGn'asks ¥Qu, th~ intervieWer, .Whether the. patient saw a 'nurse (± a.d0etbr~ (lmlh,atoccasibn. this is beeause we'wantto ..undévstand more a'bQut th~ quatity'Qfn~r:$~, t.::Qn$(.jJ~~tiQn(:Ws h~thét tb~ 11'1;If,Siieif(' }r:m:eq'the patient Qt théir c!HagnQsis orassessmentetc.). If yes proeeed to the next question. Uno skip the foll'owing2' qpestions (go to: Interviewer: Enter data for another visit?). The. ri~X12 qu.~~ti(,)ns,,$$k.yOu firs,t tQ é$.t~tz;li$hwn~therthe nurse informed the patient ab0tJtwh'átwas:.wron'g~with,them{EhferYes or Nq).'and if yes-asks you to ente.r'wh.at,the;rnl;Jr'~e,tQI(;l:'.ttie.~,aV~,Át ,.Ag,ain.r~r:nëmber th~t yoLi rtlu$tus.e thé.p~tiehr'S 'own WQté!lslb.r~qArq Wh'~;tthe:nuF~~ tolq him/her: Coming:away from a C0J1Suitation with' a ~rood underStanding :of your health problem is a marker êf'g.bO.(j:.quálity care, Finally you will be asked whether yeu want to enter details of-another clinic visit. .Ifyes pWGeed to the next bJ0ck (e.ith~r actt?:eentor on the next .page). ,If no, skip toquestior. 9'9 at the-top of page '11 (Care received at this clinic in the last 3 months), A239 Collect results of TB tests 38 39 : Did the patient indicate that he/she had seen a nurse on this occasion whether or not he/she also saw CARE RECEIVED AT THIS CLINIC IN THE LAST 3 MONTHS Page 11: Questions 99 -109 These questions ask about investigations (and in the ease of TB their results) completed at the clinic in the 3 month period between the 2 interviews. They are similar to the questions asked about the consultation at the time of the baseline interview. A240 Questions 99 and 1.00 (page 11) This asks whetherthe patient had any sputum collected for tests, Usually (but not always) this is taken to look-for TB, so we are particularly keen to know how well the clinics are screening the community for TB. Usually the first sample is taken on the day of the conslJ,lt$tigr:)·atthe clinic and the patientis given an empty containerto take home andfii;Ol'Jghd.ntothe following day, and then return.to the clinIC: FortRis;",réaso~n,W~;fir;stask whether,s<;IniplE;lswere physië13llyc.0,11.~,9tea.atth~:cJirii~,and',iK~f;\wh~~her they had received instructions to colléctfuithersamplesaKhorne. Patiemfsmay not be familiar with, the term "phlegm I sputum samples" belt they are familiar with the containers in Which this is coliecteq. Use the pictures of these containers in the visual aid (pages 26 and 27) to help you. . If the patient has. either haci'·~put9m, samples,:coHectetjat the clinic itself, or received,:instructibns to'Colleëtsamples afhame, indieateyes and enter the number ofsarhples·colleqtêd oraskeidtp be.collected, our Questions 1:()3· 10NPage'11.J These Ciue~tions ask: the. patient whéfher'they have been di::i9nosed, with TB during 1he,3 mo~th:perio.cFbetW,een intervIewS, <'lnd if yes, for some basic details oftheir diagnosis,andtreatment. It is' important to collect this ihfótmati(,;jn,lïere'~~$ \N~:have, purpps~Hy excluqeq' itfr6m the visits baekto the Clinic in the lasLa:'rhbntns. Fi~t.yOliJ;liVill askaH patients whoH?ve been back-to-the clinic in the 3 month period between interviews Whether ll:!ey have been diagnosed with TB after the baseline interview. Wyes you will be required to CQmpJete the next 4 questions. If no you may skip to question ros (same page). Forthose patieDtsWho have beerl di~gnb'~',eqwith T~ after the baseline interview, enter wn.ere theywere dié\gno,sedwithTB (Choose one option), wherl:lthey é\re<;urt~ritly receivihg th~ir TBfr~atment (C,Moo!?eo,ne,option), whenthey sta rted tMir tB 'tteatg)l~:m.t(this information' is usually on tne TB treatment CC! rd which most TS, pati~'rits/carry with them at alf times) and how often they attend the éJinic fOr'tréatmerit. Patients may hii:-ze'started 9ft attendihg tne clinic every day but interview. Because of. this we-first est~bli$h whéthér the pg:ti$rit .is béXhgTinterv.iewed at the clinic and, if YeS, if their visit to the clinic is iA an:VWéI)llinked to receiving care (see a nurse/doctor, collect medication). lfthe patient has received care from the clinic,Jhevrnayhaye teceive,d med.icatibn to tak~ home, and we want to capture the details orfhis prescription. 169 Ihterviewer:'Are:Y6ui:;Ói1dliëtii')g:this'iiltérview.'at';lhe·:patiëiirstiomêdr.;at·the:ciihic1 At.the patient's home I Atthe clinic 170 Have;you come to'the ct.inti: toa~yJust for the llufp.óSe'oHhisjrite'iViêW oï':n'thatyou are-using now" to.capture medioation-that patients use.on a reqularbasis at-home. In some cases this may be every dClyorneaf(yeveiYday (a'ig, BudesolÏi~te, Thepphyllii1e tablets). A247 establish if them quitting was in any way related to smoking cessation advice received at the clinic. If they stopped smoking before the baseline interview, skip to question 125 (top of page 13) or 169 (top of page 15). If they stopped smoking after the baseline interview, proceed to the next question and see instructions for questions 121 and 165. When did you stop smoking? 123 Before the first interview I I - skip to question 125 (top of page 13) After the first Interview Ix I - go to the next question TRAVEL TO THIS CLINIC IN THE LAST 3 MONTHS Page 13: Questions 125 -155 These are repeats of questions contained in the baseline interview and should be completed by all patients who have been back to the clinic in the 3 month period between interviews. Please see instructions in Training Manual for baseline questionnaire. PATIENTS WHO HAVE NOT BEEN BACK TO THIS CLINIC IN THE LAST 3 MONTHS Page 14: Questions 156 -159 The first question asks you, the interviewer, to confirm in the. folder that patients who report not being back to the clinic in the 3 month period between Interviews really haven't been back to the clinic. This applies only to patients who are being interviewed at the clinic where you will have access to their folders. You then ask these patients whether they haven't being diagnosed or treated for TB after the first interview, and, if yes, record where they were diagnosed and where they are receiving treatment. 157 Have you been diagnosed with TB in the last 3 months after our first interview? YES Ix I - go to the next question : NO 1 I - skip to question 160 (this page - Smoking) 158 Where were you diagnosed with TB? Interviewer: Enter cllniclhosPital name below. 8Qtshabelo Hospital 159 Where are you receiving your TB treatment? Interviewer: Enter cliniclhosoital name below. TIger River Clinic A246 In others it may be less regular (e.g. Salbutarnol inhpler orily when the chest is tight~. The questions (a rid "sub-questions") asked for eaoh med ication type are otherwise the same as in the baseline interview, ex~pttharwe have included all the antibiptics ifl the .section "Medication that YOll~a)IeLJ§ii.tgn9W" (Follow-llP questioFlAaire}vs ..only.cotrimoxazole, doxY€;YGlilje·aAd',fluep8azole under "Medleation uSually used" CIB~~elii1equesti9nn~ire.:), . I2n#hJailJe'ts~fR...áge,.'.1.;5i.· Q. 'u.'e''S. ti.ó.ns'171.7 .. .1..(1.i,6~'áti.d~.lf.!,.a(!,i.i.1..,'#Gllt;r.iê'Stl.oris:/230- There are 2:ty,pes ofil1hale.rs OPpUrJ.1ps.The [IrsHype is c~lHedthe reliever inhalers because th,ey:provide relief' imme.diatelyw~en. the' chest- is. tight ("open the ches. t"). The relieve. (i.rihalérs:~r:e.·:' - ,,' Feno.te.rol (Fe-,-nP'-"t~r91) Tradê name: Berot~c. . Useê for-asthma-and ,emphysema Fbronch ifis, Fenoterolllpratropium (Fe~no-te-rolll-pra-tro-pium) Trade Flame: Duoven] A comQir.tatiQn drqg used mainly for patients with severe asthma and emp.hysema. "pjattt9piiJirt(i~pi;a;frto~pitijJlX Tr:a~:e,narne: Atr(:)Y~!Ït l:J's:eQmainly fo.r patiêhts With erTiphy$ér:na. Sall?ÏJtam~/··(S;t/".lJtJt~a~moQ Tr~de~;f'I'élme~A:stfl.avent orV$ntQ.lin, The mQstcoml11ontelieverihhalerusedforasthmaand emphysema. Saibutain(;)Jllp~tli()'PIPm···tSal-but-ia-itnol,ll;.pra,,,ftoilpIUmj Trade name.: Cbrnbiv~nt ". A cOrrlQinatibri d'rt;Jg used mainlY for Patients with severe. asthma and emphysema. Sal".,êterof(Sal,.met~e~rol) Trade, name; Serevent Similar to salbutamol but lasts longer. Use<:lfor severe asthma or emphysema. The preventer inhplers (:1'0 not bPen4o~fch,é~t4ml,T:le(ji~tely w~.entight" bi:Jt r.athe'rprev.erit .asthma syrnptomswnen usedsr;e9UI~rly;,ona daily' tiJasis..,They do nQt':G~r~:flSmma't?~':tPr'~V§'!Jli1!!i~:'~y,~p,t,Q'rm~'hEi.r:1C~1ri.lt8t:m1e', THére is on Iyonel~p'e 'ofprevel1terinti~lêfax~Habh:Háthe FreeSta:te public service, but it Gom:es~irl 2 s~féf;l'~~bs(tOo i8nCl!'~.()O). It is.ea$ilyre,cQ~ni;zable to patients because itcbmé'S in'ai:>igboxWhicl1:.ál.só contains aspaeer. This isa plastic bottle shaped dëvice used with the ihhaleL It increases-the amount of drug whi~hTeaché$ the alrW~ys. A248 Bude~onide·(Bu~d~s·o·nide) T:r.ade·name: If::iflámmiqe Preventer inhaier used for asthma. Relie.llertlhhiilers4êaqe 15,Questions.1,72 ....,·1.8:landi.1!'1i'iF.!aqe:1], Quest/oils 2if1 ~ 242)' ". .. ,., If the patient uses.a reliever inhaler, indicate the rnarl1,eli>y~p!;:icEiti~l'awXin the adjacentbox. You mu~tthen completethe.qqe~~!J;in;,~lg@~i:~ê ai:)out difficult breathing. You must check a/lth~ relie.ver:fr:ih~l~tsJlife]):~iierlt"uses. and ask the difficulty breathing question for each OAe .. The .·.PDA·will.ask,youJojlJdicatewhetner.ihe;p~tient;lI}''e~;apc'lb,h~lE?por not sep.ara'te1y fór'e.ach:;n:Jj!J/~r onothê· ë~~tr !fy~lj;i@i$~të.'Y.ES'it;~i.l:l' . automatieally Skip to'the;difficult"breatning question betore rëtl;Jil1ihg,to the list of inhalers. A word of. caution,- patients may notrbe familiar with the terms "reliever" and "prevenfer". A~I/c(~.Ytlli;frli,ë;'~cid(A,'móx~i:.;qilclih Fclav-u-Ian"ic acid) Trade name: Bio-AmokSiklav; Al!gmentin A2S0 This is used less commonly for respiratory tract infections. It come's in a bottle. Cotrimoxazole (CO:..tr-icmox~a-zdle) Trade name: Cozole, 'l3actrim This is used, for r;~sp,lrat0rytract infections but also for P?itientswith HIV. When taken evecy:(lay ltprevents some .of the infections ,pepple·with HIV/AIDS gêta~:tlt1!~,r ihmillJne ~ystern becomes. prÓ·g.r.ês:sivëlYw~a.ker. It comes in a:b~i.s1~~;8~S.~:-P' atients,pftenkl\lOw exa$tIMf,~~~~t\~?y~~~an/vv.hen y<:ius'~Y.'~t~~or;(EHDstjr:)':fpiW..•:.Q(5n't e~nfq~~itVJith Qtt\lér'r:r~Jy~~iQrt~which com~: in 1:>1i~,t:$réniGilliri) $0 .i.!H~alleqPen VK tor short. Usedfor a Wide range ohnfectibns bLit:rhbstfrequeritly tor tonsillitis anC! pneumohla. Once again you will need to indicate whether the patient has received the medicatlen or not, how m$ny til'J.les it is 10 be taken each day, the number of tablets at a time ahdthe'duratiop of ttle,c:owrse., . Yo,uwilll1otice thatfor ':qntibiqtiC$, ,tl1átYQU are using noW" y,ouWill netneeëto fill in cletails of-the course duratlon; as these are usually taken everyday. The. PDA Willask-you.tó il'lcli~te YES orNO tdé.a'c,h .olthese antibiotics in turn, If youirrdieate YES. itwill automatica'lIy skip to the questions about no. of tlmes per day, duration pt course. etc. A2S1 ANTIBIOTICS RECEIVED. TODAY (Interviewer. Check ALL that apply) No. oftlmes to be No'ót No. of days to be taken each day lilbleis/capsules to taken for beitaken each. time . (Duration of course) 192 Amoxicillin 250mg capsules (Betamox 250) 193 194 195 196 Amoxicillin 500mg capsules(Betamox 500) X 197 3 198 1 199 5 200 Arncxicillin/clavulanic acid tablets(Blo-Amoksiklav) 201 202 203 OtherMedication (Page 16, Questions 22B --.229, P'aqe; fB.Questions 2:r8 ..,.2·79)" .. This-asks about 'avatietyofother medications,commom[y use<:fforrespiratory probl~iT1s. Follo.wtli'i:l~prq~e'di.Jteas·P,efq"r~.,q~t t!1is~iill'E~yOl'J.'qiilyh~d . indicate whether'the items.are '''received t0day" or,i'that you are using;new". We de net requlrémáté q~tail~d.irif()rmati9ri for-the.se. The. items ar,e displayed. iri the visll.ál ai<:l~o:lëtei:dingto whether they are tablets, nasal sprays ete, but listed in alphabetical order. The items appear inasingle listen the PDA You must check all the items that apply. Acetic Ac;d·Eard;'dps used-to dry out leaKing ears. Bec/omethaso.ne Nasa/$pray (Be- clo-me-tha-sone) Ttaqe name: Be91ate This is used\ferthe·treatment ef hayféver and "sinus". It Gemes it a little brown.glass bottlé. ChJ.orpheniraminé GChlór-phe"ni-ra-mine), Traqe'R'ame:,.AJI~m~x This is a' antl:;h'jsfamine used:forallergies, hayfever and sometimes the itch ef eczema. It'c:omé,$:á.s:small'yellbw'faole'ts: Eiltllapril,(Ena~la~pril) TraQe names: Rer*:ec, Hypa~ This is a blood pressure medication. The reason that we want-to know about iris that it.causes.a t[óubl~.solile cqugh as áslde-effect. It comes in a' blister ("tin-fóil") pack with the days of the week.writterr en the packaging. . Mist£J(pecto.tant'(Mist Ex"pec"tb-rC!nt) Trade name: same Thls is cough mixture. Nystatin suspension ~Ny"sta-tin) Trade names: Nystaëid, Óé!nsJat This is a suspension for thrash'in the mouth. It comes with a-little dr0pper for patients to-suck up a ml at a time. This isthen dropped into. the mouth and rinsed around. Oxynietazo/iné.N;J~arSpray (Oxy"i:néta~zo-line) A252 Trade name: Drixine This is a decongestant nasal spray used mainly for patients with sinusitis. Paracetamol (Pa-ra-ce-ta-mol) Trade names: Painamol, Panado This is the most common painkiller in primary care. Paracetamol/codeine (Pa-ra-ce-ta-moll co-deine) Trade names :Painamol Plus, Betacod, Dolorol forte This is slightly stronger than paracetamol alone and commonly used in primary care. Sa/butamol (Sal-but-a-mol) Trade name: Venteze This is the same as the reliever inhaler but in tablet form. Venteze tablets are easy to recognize as they are lilac in colour. Theophylline (The-oph-yl-line) Trade name: Nuelin SA This is a medication used for asthma and emphysema. OTHER MEDICATION RECEIVED TODAY (Interviewer: Check ALL that apply) VISITS TO OTHER HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS IN THE LAST 3 MONTHS Pages 19 - 28: Questions 280 - 486 This is laid out almost exactly as it appears in the baseline questionnaire and so I will not go into detailed explanations here. Remember that there is provision for you to enter 5 visits to health care providers (HCPs) other than the clinic (you are conducting the interview in) in the 3 month interval between interviews. You must therefore prioritise "big" visits like hospital admissions as these are very costly. If a patient has been to a pharmacy 5 times and admitted to the nearby hospital once, be sure to document the hospital admission and rather leave out one of the pharmacy visits. Other 'big" items may include visits to a traditional healer (where patients may spend a few days). If there are any visit to HCPs where the patient has had to spend a few days be sure to document the details for these visits. A253 As before each visit is recorded over 2 pages. Thé tirnefnarne is .particularly important and' shOuld qe ~~plélitl~a C\gain to the patient. It includes an events between the 2 interviéws·Jwm the moment the patient left the first interview to the moment they stepped into the follow-up interview. Be aware that HCP visits may fall at these outer limj\s>óf tne'@rmonthperiodof interest. For example a sick patient may have, gp,ne dir~:Stlyi.fi:orn,the baseline interview to. ho~pitaL .That aClmis~ion must .b,~r,e~ro~ëLih thé follOW-Up questionnaire. Anotlier patient may.'.have vi~~e:d; él rjriv.ate,tfQdtor on the m0rnil'lg of-the follow-up interview. That visit must bé'd0êqnienteo here, Unlike the baseline questionnaire, you wiILbe:;asked td: ent~rOthe.total number cif visits to élll other health care proVi!,jéfS J:jesid~s the clinic bêfbre eritering the details foreach visit. 280 Haveyou bëëtito áriotlier'hiiiiltWcare.provlder beSldes'tIlis,clinic' inthe las(3 months after our first interview? YES Ix NO I 28·1 How 'maf1y:llines"haYe YOu'.beenjo.an O,tliër'h~alth,care p'rqil,l~er'bifsléles:tI\is' cllnic'iri'thei'asf3' montnsioifter' our first hiterviêW1 Intervievioer: Enter number below: Then enter details for the visits: z CAREGIVER COSTS IN THE LAST 3 MONTHS Page 29: Questions 487 - 502 This 'section. attempts' tb ca.pturé I$st. work or opportunity.to Work ofp~opJe who care for·the patient at home during the ,3 month interval between thé 2 intër'"i~Ws. .. Tb date approximately .90% :otthe corqP.létéd: interviews reflect-that the patient does h'ave a (j)i'!regiy~r. aJ home. Pléá~I:!;:erlsl:lr~ that this person is caring for th.e .:patie,nt ,bf3~"ldtj.~ of poor .h~til,6and not because of .other reasons. Pe.o[!l.le viho are fulfUling ;usu~l·fi:!mily rdlës (like. mothers; who look after husbands and' chiléfren): and .;vno are' 119t.SR(i)cifti::aïlylooking after the, patient because of lllness are not eenslsered oareqivers for the purpose of this interview. Likewis.e family or' friends Who. ~e!p .9ut dtjrió.g busy Of stressfl;J1 times (like, fuheral,s, exams. efe) but ndt because of illness are also not consider.ed caregivérs. Remember that,you want to. capturecarer time, not.companion time (which is papture'd ungér trav~1 t«the ciii'lic' or qther'H~P visits). Ofte,n this can be diffi~u'Jt to tease out .as the same' person is both carel" and C.!ihie/HCP companion. fry to understand how much' Clays they devote to visits to the cliniczóther HOP and how m~ny days they deyóte to carii)g .fi:>fthe patient at home. This time should only be capture,d ifthe oarer is missing their usual activity (work; schoot, lookin!lfor work) tore are for the. patient-at home. A254 Remember that patients aften have more than one Cê;I_fi§§iverl;i.mit the patient to the person who spends ,the mest-time lboking. áfte.rthé :patient. ECONOMIC IMPACT OF ILLNESS Pages 30,- 31: Questions 503 - 523 The employment questions are repeated at follow-up since many people are employed seasonally and economic circumstances (and therefore the impact otillness on them) tend-to ohanqeoften in ourcemraumttes. You may need to explaih this to patients Who appear td be: losing interest towards the 'end of tlrë interview 'and are irritatéd that you are asking them the same questions as' at :baseline. Remember that you may (>nly .choose ()ne option to descnbe employment status. Choose the option that "best" described the patient's employment status. Only enter the number ef gays ¥!JJéll:)lete work/;l;Iftend sqhool/loOk for' work becfluse Qf iIIneS$, nOtfoT al1)l ether reason. Dër not eount days oh annual leave, days away to attend funerals, stud\lleave etc. The questionnaire instructs the interviewer to cor:mpl'ete question 51:6 (income last in the. last ,3 months) for aU péltiepts who indiGélte that they receive an income (employed, self"'.emRIQye(:,i'),. You do not need to collest this infQrrn.êtiQp, fr9rn, pl;lt!~nt~~.\¥hgb~; ) r,lqt ingiG~te that they receive an income g~pê.hdeht on tHe, aliii1f,y to V\ib~k ,(unem,pJo¥ed\ :studenUi:eamer, receiving gránt/pension, Qthe~;). FQf. tbes.e ul1'em,ployed (non';io.come generating) p;ahents' skipte, q,\:I.e'stion$21 (I.t/bé:$hï~·r.e,w