Advertising and Brand Loyalty in the South African Solar Industry by Zané Dippenaar Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements in respect of the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of Business Management Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences University of the Free State Bloemfontein, Republic of South Africa Supervisor: Dr Tarisai Fritz Rukuni Co-supervisor: Dr Emile Saker Nkwei October 2024 i DECLARATION I, Zané Dippenaar, declare that the thesis that I herewith submit for the doctoral degree Doctor of Philosophy (Business Management) at the University of the Free State is my independent work, and that I have not previously submitted it for a qualification at another institution of higher education. ZANÉ DIPPENAAR Date: 25 October 2024 ii DEDICATION I dedicate this thesis to my family, whose unwavering support has been my anchor throughout this journey. − To my parents, Carlo and Loami Dippenaar, words cannot fully express how grateful I am for the way you nurtured my dreams from the very start. Your unwavering love, endless support, and constant encouragement have been the foundation upon which all my achievements rest. I could not have reached this point without both of you beside me every step of the way. − To my sister, Ané Dippenaar, thank you for sharing our home during the most demanding period of writing this thesis. It was no small feat, and your patience, quiet endurance, and willingness to take on daily chores were invaluable. Your support made a world of difference and helped me push through the most challenging moments. − To Ouma Ria, your constant encouragement and loving inquiries about my progress meant more to me than you could know. Your thoughtful messages and phone calls uplifted me during difficult times, and your belief in me helped me persevere. − In loving memory of Oupa Gustav, Oupa AW, and Ouma Annette, although you are not here to witness this milestone, I carry your spirits with me every day. I feel your pride and love, and I miss you dearly. − This accomplishment reflects the collective love and support of each one of you. Thank you for being my inspiration, my strength, and my safe haven. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am truly grateful to a group of outstanding individuals whose guidance and support were instrumental in the completion of this PhD thesis. First, I extend my heartfelt thanks to Dr Tarisai Fritz Rukuni. Your rigorous push for adherence to deadlines and your invaluable input were crucial to my success. Without your steadfast support and guidance, this journey would have been insurmountable. Your involvement went far beyond professional duty; it was a cornerstone of my PhD endeavour. I am also thankful to Dr Emile Saker Nkwei, who significantly enhanced the quality of my literature review and analysis. Your tireless dedication, even during late nights, pushing me to the very end did not go unnoticed. I greatly appreciate your continuous encouragement and insightful contributions that have left a lasting impact on my work. To Prof. Neneh Brownhilder, who was my initial supervisor, I owe a great deal of gratitude. Thank you for your patience and for setting me on the correct path by connecting me with Dr Rukuni. Your guidance during the early stages of this research was fundamental. My sincere appreciation also goes to Daniel Haitzler, Managing Director of IBC SOLAR South Africa. Thank you for allowing me to use the resources essential for data collection. Your continued support, encouragement, and belief in my work were vital in bridging the practical aspects of this project. Last but not least, I cannot express enough thanks to my good friend, Christopher Steven, for your unwavering support during this journey. Your patience, emotional support, and continuous encouragement helped me find balance during the most intense periods of writing. Your presence throughout this process was invaluable. This accomplishment is not only mine but also belongs to all of you who have walked this path with me. Thank you for your enduring support, wisdom, and encouragement. iv ABSTRACT The South African solar market is expanding rapidly, and it is expected to grow from 5.44 GW in 2023 to 9.24 GW by 2028, driven by decreasing costs of photovoltaic modules, supportive government policies, and high electricity demand. This growth has attracted an influx of both domestic and international business-to-business solar distributors in the market leading to intense competition. It is becoming more necessary for distributors in the solar industry to develop customer brand loyalty while taking into consideration the significance of advertising, competitive advantage, commitment, trust and brand awareness. It is upon this background that the current study aimed to develop a model based on the moderated mediation effect of brand awareness on the relationship between below-the-line advertising and brand loyalty through competitive advantage, commitment, and trust in the South African business- to-business solar industry. This study adopted a positivist research paradigm, employing a quantitative research methodology to achieve its objectives. Data collection was through a questionnaire distributed to a convenience sample of 427 solar installation companies subscribed to IBC SOLAR’s platforms in South Africa. SmartPLS 4 was utilised to perform data analysis, including descriptive analysis, structural equation modelling, as well as mediation and moderation analysis. The structural equation modelling results indicated that below-the-line advertising did not affect brand loyalty directly. However, competitive advantage and commitment positively influenced brand loyalty, demonstrating that companies with a stronger competitive edge and higher levels of commitment enjoy greater brand loyalty. Trust, on the other hand, was not a significant predictor of brand loyalty. Furthermore, brand awareness moderated the mediation effects of competitive advantage and commitment to the advertising-brand loyalty relationship. At higher levels of brand awareness, these mediations were statistically significant, while at lower levels, they were not. Trust did not demonstrate significant mediation at any level of brand awareness. This study has major implications for theory and practice leading to the improvement of customer brand loyalty within the business-to-business solar distributors, which is essential for achieving competitive advantage. Keywords: Solar industry, Business-to-business, Below-the-line advertising, Brand loyalty, Commitment, Trust, Competitive advantage, and Brand awareness. v LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AVE Average variance extracted B2B Business-to-business BTL Below-the-line CFA Confirmatory factor analysis CMV Common method variance CTT Commitment-trust theory HTMT Heterotrait-monotrait ratio IRENA International Renewable Energy Agency PLS Partial least squares PLS-SEM Partial least squares structural equation modelling PV Photovoltaic RBT Resource-based theory SEM Structural equation modelling VIF Variance inflation factor VRIN Valuable, rare, inimitable and non-substitutable vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Declaration .............................................................................................................................................. i Dedication .............................................................................................................................................. ii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................... iii Abstract ................................................................................................................................................. iv List of Abbreviations .............................................................................................................................. v Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................. vi List of Figures ...................................................................................................................................... xiv List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................ xv CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY .............................................................................. 1 1.1 Chapter overview ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1.3 Background to the study ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.4 Preliminary literature review ................................................................................................................. 5 1.4.1 Advertising................................................................................................................................. 5 1.4.2 Brand loyalty ............................................................................................................................. 5 1.4.3 Competitive advantage ............................................................................................................. 6 1.4.4 Commitment ............................................................................................................................. 6 1.4.5 Trust ................................................................................................................................... 7 1.4.6 Brand awareness ....................................................................................................................... 7 1.4.7 Previous empirical studies on advertising, brand loyalty, commitment, trust, competitive advantage, and brand awareness ....................................................................... 7 1.5 Problem statement .............................................................................................................................. 10 1.6 Research questions .............................................................................................................................. 11 1.7 Research objectives.............................................................................................................................. 11 1.7.1 Primary research objectives ................................................................................................... 11 1.7.1.1 Theoretical research objectives .............................................................................. 11 1.7.1.2 Empirical research objectives ................................................................................. 12 1.8 Theoretical framework ........................................................................................................................ 12 1.8.1 Brand equity theory ................................................................................................................ 12 1.8.2 Business-to-business advertising effects model .................................................................... 13 vii 1.8.3 Resource-based theory ........................................................................................................... 14 1.8.4 Commitment-trust theory ...................................................................................................... 15 1.9 Conceptual framework and hypothesis development ....................................................................... 15 1.10 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................ 17 1.10.1 Research philosophy ............................................................................................................... 17 1.10.2 Research approach ................................................................................................................. 17 1.10.3 Research method .................................................................................................................... 18 1.10.4 Research strategy and time horizons ..................................................................................... 18 1.10.5 Target population ................................................................................................................... 19 1.10.6 Sampling ................................................................................................................................. 20 1.10.7 Data collection ........................................................................................................................ 20 1.10.7.1 Secondary research data......................................................................................... 20 1.10.7.2 Primary research data ............................................................................................. 21 1.10.7.3 Questionnaire design .............................................................................................. 21 1.10.8 Data analysis............................................................................................................................ 22 1.11 Contribution of the study .................................................................................................................... 23 1.12 Ethical considerations .......................................................................................................................... 27 1.12.1 Permission to conduct the study ............................................................................................ 27 1.12.2 Informed consent .................................................................................................................... 27 1.12.3 Right to withdraw ................................................................................................................... 27 1.12.4 Right to anonymity and confidentiality ................................................................................. 28 1.12.5 Data storage ............................................................................................................................ 28 1.12.6 Researcher’s contact details ................................................................................................... 28 1.12.7 Psychological risk .................................................................................................................... 28 1.12.8 Data collection instrument ..................................................................................................... 28 1.13 Thesis outline ....................................................................................................................................... 29 1.14 Chapter summary ................................................................................................................................. 29 CHAPTER 2 CONTEXT ON ADVERTISING AND BRAND LOYALTY IN THE SOLAR INDUSTRY ...................................... 30 2.1 Chapter overview ................................................................................................................................. 30 2.2 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 30 2.3 Definition of business-to-business marketing .................................................................................... 31 2.3.1 Business-to-business marketing characteristics .................................................................... 33 viii 2.4 Evolution of the solar industry ............................................................................................................ 35 2.5 Solar industry across the world ........................................................................................................... 36 2.5.1 Solar industry in Europe ......................................................................................................... 37 2.5.2 Solar industry in North America ............................................................................................. 39 2.5.3 Solar industry in Asia .............................................................................................................. 40 2.5.4 Solar industry in Oceania ........................................................................................................ 42 2.5.5 Solar industry in South America ............................................................................................. 43 2.5.6 Solar industry in Africa ............................................................................................................ 44 2.6 Solar industry in South Africa .............................................................................................................. 46 2.6.1 Solar industry support in South Africa ................................................................................... 47 2.6.2 Opportunities for business-to-business solar distributors in South Africa .......................... 48 2.7 Competition in the business-to-business solar industry in South Africa ........................................... 49 2.8 Chapter summary ................................................................................................................................. 50 CHAPTER 3 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK ................................................................................................................. 52 3.1 Chapter overview ................................................................................................................................. 52 3.2 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 52 3.3 Business-to-business advertising effects model ................................................................................. 52 3.3.1 Origin and evolution of the business-to-business advertising effects model ...................... 53 3.3.2 Components of the business-to-business advertising effects model ................................... 54 3.3.3 Arguments in favour of the business-to-business advertising effects model ...................... 55 3.3.4 Limitations of the business-to-business advertising effects model ..................................... 56 3.4 Resource-based theory ........................................................................................................................ 57 3.4.1 Development of the resource-based theory ......................................................................... 58 3.4.2 Fundamental aspects of the resource-based theory ............................................................ 59 3.4.3 Supporting perspectives on the resource-based theory ....................................................... 60 3.4.4 Drawbacks of the resource-based theory .............................................................................. 61 3.5 Brand equity theory ............................................................................................................................. 62 3.5.1 Evolution of the brand equity theory..................................................................................... 62 3.5.2 Core elements of the brand equity theory ............................................................................ 63 3.5.3 Value of the brand equity theory ........................................................................................... 64 3.5.4 Challenges associated with the brand equity theory ............................................................ 65 3.6 Commitment-trust theory ................................................................................................................... 66 ix 3.6.1 Formation of the commitment-trust theory ......................................................................... 67 3.6.2 Principal components of the commitment-trust theory ....................................................... 68 3.6.3 Justifications for the commitment-trust theory .................................................................... 69 3.6.4 Critiques and limitations of the commitment-trust theory .................................................. 70 3.7 Chapter summary ................................................................................................................................. 71 CHAPTER 4 CONCEPTUAL RESEARCH MODEL AND HYPOTHESES DEVELOPMENT ................................................... 72 4.1 Chapter overview ................................................................................................................................. 72 4.2 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 72 4.3 Advertising ............................................................................................................................................ 72 4.3.1 Definition of advertising ......................................................................................................... 72 4.3.2 Types of advertising ................................................................................................................ 75 4.3.2.1 Direct mail advertising ............................................................................................ 75 4.3.2.2 Social media advertising ......................................................................................... 76 4.3.2.3 Display advertising .................................................................................................. 76 4.3.3 Importance of advertising in the study .................................................................................. 77 4.4 Brand loyalty ......................................................................................................................................... 80 4.4.1 Definition of brand loyalty ...................................................................................................... 80 4.4.2 Importance of brand loyalty ................................................................................................... 82 4.4.3 Role of brand loyalty in the study .......................................................................................... 83 4.5 Competitive advantage ........................................................................................................................ 85 4.6 Commitment ........................................................................................................................................ 86 4.7 Trust ...................................................................................................................................................... 87 4.8 Brand awareness .................................................................................................................................. 88 4.9 Conceptual framework and hypotheses development ...................................................................... 89 4.9.1 Relationship between below-the-line advertising and brand loyalty .................................. 90 4.9.2 Relationship between competitive advantage and brand loyalty ........................................ 91 4.9.3 Relationship between commitment and brand loyalty ........................................................ 92 4.9.4 Relationship between trust and brand loyalty ...................................................................... 94 4.9.5 Moderated mediation effect of brand awareness ................................................................ 95 4.9.5.1 Mediating role of competitive advantage .............................................................. 95 4.9.5.2 Mediating role of commitment .............................................................................. 96 4.9.5.3 Mediating role of trust ............................................................................................ 96 x 4.9.5.4 Moderating role of brand awareness ..................................................................... 97 4.10 Chapter summary ................................................................................................................................. 98 CHAPTER 5 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................. 99 5.1 Chapter overview ................................................................................................................................. 99 5.2 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 99 5.3 Research design .................................................................................................................................. 101 5.4 Research onion framework................................................................................................................ 103 5.4.1 Research philosophy ............................................................................................................. 103 5.4.2 Approach to theory development ........................................................................................ 106 5.4.3 Methodological choice ......................................................................................................... 107 5.4.4 Research strategy .................................................................................................................. 109 5.4.5 Time horizon ......................................................................................................................... 112 5.4.6 Data collection and procedure ............................................................................................. 112 5.4.7 Operationalisation of constructs and measurements ......................................................... 113 5.4.7.1 Data collection instrument and measurement .................................................... 113 5.4.7.2 Pilot study and pretesting of the questionnaire .................................................. 118 5.4.8 Sampling design and procedures ......................................................................................... 119 5.4.8.1 Definition of the target population ...................................................................... 119 5.4.8.2 Selection of a sampling frame .............................................................................. 120 5.4.8.3 Selection of a sampling technique ....................................................................... 120 5.4.8.4 Determine the sample size ................................................................................... 121 5.4.8.5 Execute the sampling process .............................................................................. 122 5.4.9 Data integrity and data analysis ........................................................................................... 123 5.4.9.1 Missing data .......................................................................................................... 123 5.4.9.2 Data cleaning and screening ................................................................................. 124 5.4.9.3 Descriptive statistics .............................................................................................. 124 5.4.9.4 Common method variance ................................................................................... 125 5.4.9.5 Structural equation modelling .............................................................................. 125 5.5 Chapter summary ............................................................................................................................... 130 CHAPTER 6 DATA ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION...................................................................................................... 131 6.1 Chapter overview ............................................................................................................................... 131 xi 6.2 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 131 6.3 Primary research objectives and hypotheses ................................................................................... 131 6.3.1 Empirical research objectives ............................................................................................... 132 6.3.2 Hypotheses ............................................................................................................................ 132 6.4 Descriptive statistics .......................................................................................................................... 133 6.4.1 Screening questions and realisation rate ............................................................................ 133 6.4.2 Demographic profile of the respondents ............................................................................ 135 6.4.3 Patronage habits ................................................................................................................... 137 6.4.4 Central tendency measure of the constructs ...................................................................... 139 6.4.4.1 Below-the-line advertising .................................................................................... 140 6.4.4.2 Brand loyalty .......................................................................................................... 142 6.4.4.3 Commitment ......................................................................................................... 144 6.4.4.4 Trust ....................................................................................................................... 146 6.4.4.5 Competitive advantage ......................................................................................... 149 6.4.4.6 Brand awareness ................................................................................................... 151 6.5 Common method variance ................................................................................................................ 154 6.6 Structural equation modelling ........................................................................................................... 154 6.6.1 Measurement model assessment ........................................................................................ 155 6.6.1.1 Assessment of reflective measurements ............................................................. 155 6.6.1.2 Assessment of formative measurements............................................................. 158 6.6.2 Structural model analysis ..................................................................................................... 159 6.6.2.1 Collinearity evaluation .......................................................................................... 159 6.6.2.2 Path analysis: relevance and significance of the structural model ..................... 160 6.6.2.3 Explanatory power assessment ............................................................................ 163 6.6.2.4 Predictive power assessment ............................................................................... 164 6.7 Discussions on testing the hypotheses ............................................................................................. 165 6.7.1 Relationship between below-the-line advertising and brand loyalty ................................ 165 6.7.2 Relationship between competitive advantage and brand loyalty ...................................... 166 6.7.3 Relationship between commitment and brand loyalty ...................................................... 168 6.7.4 Relationship between trust and brand loyalty .................................................................... 169 6.7.5 Interplay between brand awareness, below-the-line advertising, brand loyalty, and competitive advantage ......................................................................................................... 170 xii 6.7.6 Interplay between brand awareness, below-the-line advertising, brand loyalty, and commitment .......................................................................................................................... 171 6.7.7 Interplay between brand awareness, below-the-line advertising, brand loyalty, and trust ............................................................................................................................... 173 6.8 Chapter summary ............................................................................................................................... 174 CHAPTER 7 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................... 176 7.1 Chapter overview ............................................................................................................................... 176 7.2 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 176 7.3 Conclusions on research objectives and research questions ........................................................... 177 7.3.1 Conclusion on the literature review ..................................................................................... 177 7.3.2 Conclusion on solar installation companies’ perceptions ................................................... 177 7.3.3 Conclusion on the impact of below-the-line advertising on brand loyalty in the business-to-business solar industry ..................................................................................... 179 7.3.4 Conclusion on the effect of competitive advantage on brand loyalty in the business- to-business solar industry ..................................................................................................... 179 7.3.5 Conclusion on the effect of commitment on brand loyalty in the business-to- business solar industry ......................................................................................................... 179 7.3.6 Conclusion on the effect of trust on brand loyalty in the business-to-business solar industry ............................................................................................................................... 180 7.3.7 Conclusion on the moderated mediation role of brand awareness ................................... 180 7.4 Summary of the major findings and conclusions on research hypotheses ..................................... 181 7.5 Contribution of the study .................................................................................................................. 181 7.6 Implications for theory....................................................................................................................... 183 7.7 Implications for practice .................................................................................................................... 184 7.7.1 Re-evaluate advertising strategies ....................................................................................... 184 7.7.2 Develop a comprehensive brand loyalty framework .......................................................... 185 7.7.3 Reconsider the role of trust .................................................................................................. 185 7.7.4 Foster commitment through customer education .............................................................. 186 7.7.5 Tailor below-the-line advertising to enhance commitment ............................................... 186 7.7.6 Prioritise competitive advantage ......................................................................................... 187 7.7.7 Enhance below-the-line advertising to support competitive advantage ........................... 187 7.7.8 Leverage brand awareness strategically .............................................................................. 187 7.8 Limitations of the study ..................................................................................................................... 188 7.9 Directions for future research ........................................................................................................... 190 xiii 7.10 Chapter summary ............................................................................................................................... 191 REFERENCE LIST .................................................................................................................................. 192 APPENDIX A: CONSENT FORM AND QUESTIONNAIRE .............................................................................................. 262 APPENDIX B: PLAGIARISM REPORT ......................................................................................................................... 273 APPENDIX C: PROOF OF EDITING ............................................................................................................................. 275 xiv LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1: Conceptual framework .......................................................................................................... 16 Figure 3.1: Resource-based theory .......................................................................................................... 60 Figure 3.2: Brand equity theory ............................................................................................................... 64 Figure 3.3: Association of self-expressive with brand love ...................................................................... 69 Figure 5.1: Research methodology overview......................................................................................... 100 Figure 5.2: Research onion .................................................................................................................... 102 Figure 5.3: Sampling design process ...................................................................................................... 119 Figure 5.4: SEM process......................................................................................................................... 126 Figure 6.1: Second-order formative measurement model of BTL advertising ....................................... 159 Figure 6.2: Structural model .................................................................................................................. 167 xv LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1: Target population .................................................................................................................. 19 Table 1.2: Sample size ............................................................................................................................ 20 Table 1.3: Outline of the thesis .............................................................................................................. 29 Table 4.1: Importance of brand loyalty .................................................................................................. 83 Table 5.1: Research philosophies with their respective assumptions .................................................. 104 Table 5.2: Operationalisation of the constructs ................................................................................... 115 Table 6.1: Hypotheses formulated for the study .................................................................................. 132 Table 6.2: Descriptive statistics on brand loyalty among solar installation companies ........................ 134 Table 6.3: Descriptive statistics of the demographics .......................................................................... 135 Table 6.4: Most common solar brands installed................................................................................... 136 Table 6.5: Most common solar distributors ......................................................................................... 138 Table 6.6: Frequency of purchasing...................................................................................................... 139 Table 6.7: Below-the-line advertising ................................................................................................... 141 Table 6.8: Brand loyalty ........................................................................................................................ 143 Table 6.9: Commitment........................................................................................................................ 145 Table 6.10: Trust .................................................................................................................................... 148 Table 6.11: Competitive advantage ........................................................................................................ 150 Table 6.12: Brand awareness ................................................................................................................. 152 Table 6.13: Harman’s single-factor test .................................................................................................. 154 Table 6.14: Construct reliability and validity .......................................................................................... 156 Table 6.15: Results of discriminant validity of the measurement model using the Fornell and Larcker technique ................................................................................................................ 157 Table 6.16: Results of the discriminant validity of the measurement model HTMT criterion ................ 158 Table 6.17: VIFs of the second-order formative model .......................................................................... 159 Table 6.18: VIF outer model ................................................................................................................... 160 Table 6.19: Direct effects – mean, standard deviation, T values, p values ............................................. 161 Table 6.20: Moderated mediation effects – mean, standard deviation, T values, p values .................... 162 Table 6.21: R2 values of constructs ......................................................................................................... 164 Table 6.22: Path coefficients and significance (f²) .................................................................................. 164 Table 6.23: Q2 values of constructs ........................................................................................................ 165 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY 1.1 Chapter overview Chapter 1 provides a comprehensive foundation for the research study. It begins by establishing the background of the study, followed by a preliminary literature review that covers key concepts such as advertising, brand loyalty, brand awareness, commitment, trust, and competitive advantage. Previous empirical studies in these areas are also examined. Furthermore, the chapter presents the problem statement, research questions, and research objectives, both theoretical and empirical for the study. The theoretical framework is introduced, drawing upon theories including the brand equity theory, business- to-business (B2B) advertising effects model, resource-based theory (RBT), and commitment-trust theory (CTT). The conceptual framework is also provided to visually represent the relationships between the variables. Additionally, the chapter discusses the contribution of the study to the field and outlines the methodology that was employed. This includes an overview of the research philosophy, approach, strategy, target population, sampling, data collection methods (both secondary and primary), questionnaire design, and data analysis techniques that were used. Lastly, the ethical considerations in conducting this research are addressed, while an outline of the subsequent chapters is presented. 1.2 Introduction It is becoming imperative for B2B distributors in the solar industry to develop and maintain mutually satisfying long-term relationships. They further have to establish brand loyalty with their customers who are, in the context of this study, solar installation companies systems (Guerola-Navarro, Gil-Gomez, Oltra- Badenes and Soto-Acosta 2022). Building and nurturing brand loyalty is of particular significance in the B2B solar sector. This significance is not only for enhancing customer retention but also for mitigating the risk of customers switching to alternative brands (Sadamoro, Ajayi, Ayodel and Areola 2023). As per a report by Misbrener (2023), the proportion of sales related to solar inverters saw a declining trend, falling from 66% in 2021 to 58% in 2022. This decline suggests a notable shift in customer preferences and brand choices. This situation is worrisome for B2B players in the solar industry as it might result in a loss of competitive advantage if they do not pursue strategic marketing moves. The loss of competitive advantage will be regrettable in the South African B2B solar industry considering the positive growth prospects within the South African solar industry. South Africa is a leader within the African renewable 2 energy area (Galal 2023a). It is projected that South Africa will expand its solar industry from 5.44 gigawatts in 2023 to 9.24 gigawatts by 2028 with an estimated compound annual growth rate of 11.17% (Mordor Intelligence Research and Advisory 2023a). The growth of the solar industry in South Africa is propelled by decreasing solar photovoltaic (PV) module costs, favourable government policies, and the need for reliable electricity (Matthews 2023). Furthermore, South Africa’s abundant sunshine and radiation potential, with over 2 500 hours of annual sunshine and solar radiation between 4.5 and 6.5 kWh/m2 per day has made the solar industry lucrative (Mordor Intelligence Research and Advisory 2023a). This positive outlook in the South African solar industry has attracted both local and global B2B distributors to benefit from the growing demand (ECODIT LLC 2022). This influx of distributors in the South African B2B solar industry is a cause for concern since it has led to enormous competition. Well-known B2B solar distributors fighting for survival in the South African solar industry include IBC SOLAR, SolarAfrica, Rubicon, SunPower, Hohm Energy, and Warpower (Caine 2023; My Broadband 2023). To effectively tackle the challenge of rising competition, B2B solar distributors should understand the importance of fostering brand loyalty. According to Hasan and Sohail (2021), strong advertising programmes can lead to brand loyalty. Well-known advertising programmes involve the use of direct mail, social media, and display advertising (Katz 2022). Despite the importance of advertising in fostering brand loyalty, important factors that bring a comprehensive marketing programme such as competitive advantage, trust, commitment and brand awareness should not be overlooked (Rane, Achari and Choudhary 2023). In the context of this study, brand loyalty refers to consistent and repeated preference by a solar installation company for a specific B2B solar distributor (Hasan and Sohail 2021). Advertising involves a series of strategic messages through various media to engage and drive specific B2B customer actions (Chaffey 2019). Commitment is defined as the extent of dedication and emotional attachment individuals or entities exhibit toward the ongoing development and persistence of a relationship (Goutam 2020; Abid, Siddique, Gulzar, Shamim, Dar and Zafar 2023). Trust, on the other hand, denotes the conviction or assurance that one party places in the dependability, honesty, and ethical conduct of another party within the context of a relationship (Palací, Salcedo and Topa 2019; Ngah, Abdul Rashid, Ariffin, Ibrahim, Abu Osman, Kamalrulzaman, Mohamad and Harun 2022). Competitive advantage is a unique position allowing a company to surpass rivals (Correia, Dias and Teixeira 2021). Brand awareness is customers' recognition and recall of a brand (Hasan and Sohail 2021). 3 The body of knowledge shows extensive linear research focusing on advertising, brand loyalty, competitive advantage, commitment, trust and brand awareness (Correia et al. 2021; Hanaysha 2022; Mei and Wei 2022; Thomran, Alshallaqi, Al-Mamary and Abdulrab 2022; Ma, Wu and Li 2023). Research on the aforementioned factors has remained fragmented, involving advertising and brand loyalty (Voorveld, van Noort, Muntinga and Bronner 2018); commitment and brand loyalty (Shin, Amenuvor, Basilisco and Owusu-Antwi 2019); trust and brand loyalty (Samarah, Bayram, Aljuhmani and Elrehail 2022); and, advertising and competitive advantage (Adama, Popoola, Okeke and Akinoso 2024). Also, despite substantial research that shows the importance of competitive advantage, commitment, and trust, there is a gap in the literature involving the mediating role of these factors in the advertising-brand loyalty relationship, especially within the B2B setting (Voorveld et al. 2018; Correia et al. 2021; Hanaysha 2022; Thomran et al. 2022). Existing fragmented literature suggests that existing research on advertising’s impact on brand loyalty through commitment, trust, and competitive advantage lacks a cohesive framework (Goutam 2020; Palací, Salcedo and Topa 2019; Correia et al. 2021; Hasan and Sohail 2021; Ngah et al. 2022; Abid et al. 2023). Also, ignored is the moderation effect of brand awareness on the relationship between advertising and brand loyalty. Diverse perspectives, methodologies, and limited interdisciplinary integration are evident, hindering a more inclusive understanding. To close this gap, the current study sought to build a comprehensive marketing programme for B2B solar distributors in South Africa by investigating the moderated mediation effect of brand awareness on the relationship between advertising and brand loyalty through competitive advantage, commitment, and trust. 1.3 Background to the study Regional trends and economic dynamics heavily influence the global B2B solar industry. Asian countries lead the solar industry, while Europe has seen a decline (Kesari, Atulkar and Pandey 2021). As B2B distributors navigate these trends, they must consider the varied opportunities and challenges in different regions. Developing countries, in particular, are shifting towards solar utility projects, with an expected 85% of global energy generation coming from renewables by 2050 (Eseosa and Ejiroro 2020). Notably, these nations are building more clean energy infrastructure compared to fossil fuel-based power, driven by government initiatives promoting solar rooftop adoption. This presents significant opportunities for B2B distributors to enter and expand in these markets. Environmentally conscious consumers increasingly prefer products that align with sustainability goals (Kesari et al. 2021). B2B distributors can capitalise on this trend by positioning themselves as providers of eco-friendly products and services. Effective advertising that emphasises clean energy, reduced carbon footprints, and cost savings can strongly 4 resonate with target audiences (Kesari et al. 2021; Sadamoro et al. 2023). In Asia, brand loyalty is a significant factor influencing corporate responsibility and sustainable development (Min and Leong 2024). In North America, solar energy adoption is driven by environmental awareness, government incentives, cost reduction, and technological progress (Mordor Intelligence Research and Advisory 2023a). The United States is expected to maintain a dominant market position due to its high electricity consumption. B2B solar distributors align their products with these priorities, emphasising efficiency, energy independence, and reduced reliance on fossil fuels (Asif, Zhongfu, Ahmad, Irfan, Razzaq and Ameer 2022). Europe remains a leader in renewable energy, with over 20% of the European Union's energy consumption in 2021 derived from renewables (Limb 2023). B2B enterprises can seize this opportunity by aligning their offerings with the region's climate goals and emission reduction objectives. European customers value sustainability, and informative campaigns that empower environmentally conscious choices are effective (Khandai, Mathew, Yadav, Kataria and Kohli 2023). B2B solar distributors can position themselves as partners in sustainability, providing solutions and education to their customers (Sadamoro et al. 2023). South America presents a varied landscape due to economic disparities, but growth in solar energy is driven by government policies, increasing demand, and the falling cost of solar PV systems (Mordor Intelligence Research and Advisory 2023b). B2B distributors must tailor their advertising strategies to highlight affordability, energy independence, and social progress, thereby fostering brand loyalty (Asif et al. 2022; Ukoba, Yoro, Eterigho-Ikelegbe, Ibegbulam and Jen 2024). Africa's solar sector is growing, with installed solar power capacity projected to increase significantly by 2040 (Awose 2023). B2B distributors must tailor their messaging to Africa’s diverse markets, emphasising local benefits such as job creation and stakeholder engagement (Creamer 2022; ECODIT LLC 2022). Public awareness campaigns that educate about solar energy's benefits are essential for building trust and fostering adoption (REGlobal 2021). In South Africa, a leader in Africa’s renewable energy sector, B2B distributors face unique challenges and opportunities. The country’s ambitious solar energy goals, coupled with government policies and the need for reliable electricity, drive market growth (Galal 2023a; Matthews 2023). Advertising in South Africa focuses on energy security, cost savings, and environmental responsibility, resonating with customers facing electricity shortages (Ferragamo 2023). Brand loyalty is critical in South Africa, where energy demand and supply shortages are prevalent (Omarjee 2023). Effective communication of reduced reliance on conventional energy sources and partnerships in the renewable energy sector is crucial (Kumar 2020). B2B distributors must address these challenges transparently to foster trust and loyalty in a competitive 5 market (Poblete and Halldórsson 2023). Given the importance of brand loyalty in the solar industry, particularly in South Africa, this study explores the integration of multiple theoretical frameworks to understand brand loyalty in a B2B context. It combines insights from the B2B advertising effects model, brand equity theory, resource-based theory, and the commitment-trust theory to examine cognitive, emotional, and competitive dynamics in the industry (Shan, Luo, Zhou and Wei 2019; Bernarto, Berlianto, Meilani, Masman and Suryawan 2020; Cortez, Gilliland and Johnston 2020; Pascual-Ferrá 2021; Nayak, Bhattacharyya and Krishnamoorthy 2023; Alcántara-Pilar, Rodriguez-López, Kalinić and Liébana- Cabanillas 2024). 1.4 Preliminary literature review This section discusses the preliminary literature on advertising, brand loyalty, brand awareness, commitment, trust, and competitive advantage. This is important in providing an early understanding of the key constructs of the study. Advertising is discussed next. 1.4.1 Advertising Different forms of advertising are commonly classified as “above-the-line” and “below-the-line” (BTL) advertising (Alina, Jahangir and Malik 2023). This study opted to concentrate solely on BTL advertising to assess its influence on brand loyalty. Above-the-line advertising primarily centres around using mass media platforms to connect with a broad and varied audience. In contrast, BTL advertising is based on engaging with specific, targeted segments of the audience. This typically involves employing personalised and direct communication methods to connect with a particular group of customers (Prete 2015). While various advertising types have been explored, this study concentrates more on BTL advertising. This includes social media advertising, direct mail advertising, and display advertising, such as display banners in the online shop (Swani, Brown and Mudambi 2020; Qader, Hamza, Othman, Anwer, Hamad, Gardi and Ibrahim 2022; Indeed Editorial Team 2023). 1.4.2 Brand loyalty Brand loyalty is a critical outcome of effective marketing efforts, reflecting the depth of the emotional and psychological bond between customers and a brand (Ghorbanzadeh 2021). Measuring brand loyalty involves a combination of both attitudinal and behavioural aspects. Traditional measures include repeat purchase rates, purchase frequency, and customer retention rates, which indicate the extent to which 6 customers consistently choose a particular brand (Dick and Basu 1994). Customer satisfaction and net promoter score are indicators that evaluate consumer perceptions and the likelihood of recommending the brand to others (Barath 2022). Moreover, modern approaches to measuring brand loyalty incorporate social media sentiment analysis to gauge online conversations and sentiment toward the brand (Bastug, Calisir, Gülmez and Ateş 2020). 1.4.3 Competitive advantage Competitive advantage is a pivotal aspect of strategic management, signifying the distinct strengths and capabilities that empower a company to surpass its competitors. A thorough assessment combining market, financial, and resource-based measures furnishes a grasp of a firm's competitive advantage, informing strategic decision-making. Market-oriented measures, such as market share, growth rate, and customer retention, shed light on the firm’s comparative standing (Gleißner, Helm and Kreiter 2013; Mehta 2023). Financial indicators, including return on assets and return on equity, reflect the firm's ability to generate profits from its resources (Grant 2016; Wijayanto, Suhadak, Dzulkirom and Nuzula 2019). Resource-based measures, rooted in the resource-based view of the firm, assess the firm’s unique resources, capabilities, and core competencies that drive its competitive advantage (Shan, Luo, Zhou and Wei 2019). Moreover, dynamic capabilities, which encompass the firm's adaptability and innovation, play a role in measuring competitive advantage in swiftly changing markets (Ferreira, Coelho and Moutinho 2020). 1.4.4 Commitment Evaluating commitment is a complex and context-dependent process, characterised by variations in its definitions and dimensions. Marketing research has consistently utilised a three-component commitment model, including affective, normative, and calculative commitment (Muda and Fook 2020). First, limited alternatives and the costs associated with switching are recognised constraints on switching decisions, suggesting that higher calculative commitment reduces the likelihood of defection. Second, normative considerations, influenced by social pressures, can either hinder or facilitate switching behaviours, with greater normative pressure increasing the likelihood of customer retention. Lastly, increased satisfaction and positive emotions derived from a relationship make alternative options less appealing, reinforcing customer loyalty intentions and indicating affective commitment. 7 1.4.5 Trust Trust is a fundamental concept spanning various domains, and its evaluation holds significance for comprehending relationships and decision-making processes. Furthermore, trust is subject to influences such as perceived competence and benevolence. Its assessment should be context-specific, whether within interpersonal relationships, business dealings, or online interactions (Di Battista, Pivetti and Berti 2020). Acknowledging trust's diverse roles in various settings and employing suitable assessment approaches is vital for both research endeavours and practical applications. 1.4.6 Brand awareness Brand awareness is vital in consumer decision-making processes, exerting a crucial influence on the efficacy of marketing strategies. Increasing brand awareness involves assessing the degree to which a brand is recognised and recalled by customers through aided and unaided recall (Khurram, Qadeer and Sheeraz 2018). Brand recognition and recall indicate customers' capacity to identify a brand within a set of alternatives. Furthermore, metrics such as brand exposure and reach, often quantified through impressions and advertising campaign reach, offer numerical indicators of brand visibility (Chierici, Del Bosco, Mazzucchelli and Chiacchierini 2019). Modern technology has introduced digital analytics tools that track online interactions, click-through rates, and social media mentions, providing a more inclusive perspective on digital brand awareness (Azizan, Chik, Zulaika, Fadzli and Ishar 2023). By integrating cognitive and behavioural measurements, marketers can broadly understand how brand awareness influences consumer perceptions and preferences. 1.4.7 Previous empirical studies on advertising, brand loyalty, commitment, trust, competitive advantage, and brand awareness The role of advertising in promoting brand loyalty extends far beyond basic communication (Ha, John, Janda and Muthaly 2011; Rather, Tehseen and Parrey 2018). Voorveld et al. (2018) previously found that there is a positive and significant link between using multi-channel advertising strategies and boosting brand loyalty, especially when integrating online and traditional media. Similarly, Ma et al. (2023) concluded that such an investment reflects a brand's confidence in its products, which in turn strengthens consumer trust and loyalty. Jain, Basu, and Dwivedi (2024) also highlighted that product advertising is the strongest predictor of customer loyalty in the consumer goods industry, underlining the role of targeted advertising efforts in fostering long-term brand relationships. In the restaurant sector, Rahi, Ammara and 8 Qazi (2021) found that advertising plays a pivotal role in building loyalty, demonstrating the cross-industry relevance of these strategies. Furthermore, Kulawardena and Kalpana (2024) discovered that entertainment value from social media advertising significantly impacted consumer brand loyalty in Sri Lanka's apparel retail industry, revealing the growing importance of engagement, and creative advertisement content in maintaining customer loyalty. Recent research highlights the critical role of competitive advantage as a mediator in various business contexts, including its influence on the relationship between environmental, social, and governance practices, brand reputation, and customer loyalty (Singh, Verma, Fatima and Kumar 2024). Studies also show that competitive advantage mediates the relationship between financial standards, innovation adoption, market orientation, and small and medium-sized enterprise performance (Correia et al. 2021; Inrawan, Silitonga, Halim, Lie and Sudirman 2021). Additionally, the direct impact of competitive advantage on brand loyalty is supported by findings from Adama et al. (2024), emphasising its importance in B2B sectors like solar installation, and Arslan (2020), who examined its influence on customer loyalty through perceived value and trust. Brand commitment has been found to mediate various relationships in different contexts, and its impact on brand loyalty is well-documented. Alkhawaldeh, Al-Salaymeh, Alshare and Eneizan (2017) identified that brand commitment mediates the link between brand awareness and brand loyalty in the economic sectors of Jordan, emphasising its role in maintaining customer loyalty. Similarly, Amani (2015) found that commitment mediates the relationship between trust and relationship loyalty in the retail sector, underscoring the importance of trust in building loyal customer bases. Additionally, Van Tonder (2016) highlighted that commitment mediates the relationship between quality advice and customer loyalty towards insurance agents, pointing to the influence of both trust and commitment on customer retention. In addition to these findings, the direct impact of commitment on brand loyalty will also be tested in this research. Studies have shown a strong direct relationship between commitment and loyalty. For instance, Shin et al. (2019) revealed that smartphone users in South Korea with strong brand commitment are more likely to develop lasting loyalty, reinforcing commitment as a key factor in cultivating long-term customer relationships. Similarly, Malik (2020) found that brand awareness and brand commitment positively influence brand loyalty, with customer satisfaction acting as a mediator in the restaurant sector. These studies illustrate the significant role of brand commitment both as a mediator and a direct driver of brand loyalty, which justifies its inclusion in this study. 9 Trust has been empirically confirmed as a critical mediator in various contexts across numerous studies conducted over the past decade (Trivedi and Yadav 2020; Barden, Wang, Sternberg, Poole and Balderrama-Durbin 2021; Hanaysha 2022). Arslan (2020) examined the impact of customer-perceived value and competitive advantage on customer loyalty, demonstrating that trust significantly mediates this relationship, reinforcing the role of competitive dynamics in fostering loyalty. Similarly, Trivedi and Yadav (2020) showed how trust amplifies the effect of consumer satisfaction by significantly enhancing the relationship between e-satisfaction and repurchase intentions among Generation Y customers, suggesting that trust not only affects immediate consumer behaviour but also strengthens long-term customer loyalty and engagement. Additionally, the direct impact of trust on brand loyalty will be tested, supported by studies such as Samarah et al. (2022), which highlighted brand trust’s critical role in shaping loyalty in the consumer electronics market, and Chen, Prentice, Weaven and Hisao (2022), who found a strong correlation between customer trust, engagement, and loyalty in the home-sharing sector. These studies collectively affirm trust's pivotal role as both a mediator and a direct influencer of customer loyalty across diverse domains. Brand awareness significantly influences outcomes related to firm performance, competitive advantage, and consumer behaviour across various contexts. Tiwari, Bryde, Stavropoulou and Malhotra (2024) found that brand awareness moderates the relationship between supply chain flexibility and business performance, while Kozlenkova, Samaha and Palmatier (2014) showed that it enhances the effectiveness of marketing capabilities in driving firm success. Similarly, Thomran et al. (2022) discovered that brand awareness positively affects small and medium-sized enterprises’ competitive advantage. Expanding this, several studies highlight the moderating role of brand awareness in shaping consumer behaviour. Yigit and Tıgli (2018) demonstrated that brand awareness and brand loyalty moderate the effects of browsing behaviour, perceived low prices, and time pressure on online impulse buying, while Adiwijaya, McGuinness, Cary and Herjanto (2021) found it moderates the relationship between product innovation, brand trust, and brand loyalty. In the mobile banking sector, Mekebbaty, Saleh and Al Badaly (2020) showed that brand awareness strengthens the link between brand experience and trust, and Fatah (2024) found that awareness levels moderate the relationship between content types and purchase intention. These studies collectively suggest that brand awareness, while indirectly boosting brand loyalty, plays a crucial role in reinforcing factors such as trust, purchase intention, and impulse buying, thus enhancing overall brand performance (Imran, Durrani, Ishfaq and Ashraf 2020). The problem statement will be outlined in the next section. 10 1.5 Problem statement The South African solar energy market is steadily expanding, driven by supportive government policies and increasing consumer awareness of renewable energy benefits (Matthews 2023; Mordor Intelligence Research and Advisory 2023a). This resulted in a compelling incentive for B2B distributors to enter the South African solar industry. The growing demand for clean energy solutions coupled with the country’s abundant solar resources makes it an attractive investment opportunity for B2B solar distributors seeking to capitalise on the shift towards sustainability. This helps reduce reliance on traditional energy sources. As a result, an influx of B2B solar distributors is entering the South African market, intensifying competition and fostering innovation in the industry (ECODIT LLC 2022; My Broadband 2023). Therefore, distributors in the solar industry operating in a B2B setting are increasingly compelled to establish brand loyalty with solar installation companies (Guerola-Navarro et al. 2022). This loyalty is crucial in solar energy to retain customers and reduce brand switching (Sadamoro et al. 2023). The solar energy industry has shown significant promise in terms of growth and sustainability (Mordor Intelligence Research and Advisory 2023a). However, various obstacles accompany this promising growth, particularly due to increased competition. Among the notable hurdles, the industry grapples with brand- switching and the issue of limited awareness among potential customers (Misbrener 2023). B2B solar distributors, who play a pivotal role in the industry's distribution chain, face a unique set of difficulties. They are tasked with the dual challenge of maintaining brand loyalty among existing customers while establishing brand awareness to attract new customers (Alkhawaldeh et al. 2017). This is particularly problematic in an environment marked by a prevailing trend of brand-switching (Misbrener 2023). This complex landscape necessitates innovative solutions and strategies to overcome these obstacles and continue the industry’s promising trajectory. Therefore, to prevent shifting between brands, effective advertising and maintaining competitive advantage are key (Rua and Santos 2022). Nurturing higher commitment and trust also plays a pivotal role in sustaining brand loyalty (Bricci, Fragata and Antunes 2016; Melewar, Foroudi, Gupta, Kitchen and Foroudi 2017; Rane et al. 2023). Existing literature on advertising, brand loyalty, brand awareness, commitment, trust, and competitive advantage is fragmented. While some studies have focused on factors influencing the relationship between different types of advertising and brand loyalty (Hasan and Sohail 2021), others have focused on the mediation effect of commitment (Ribeiro, Duarte, Filipe and David 2022), trust (Trivedi and Yadav 2020), competitive advantage (Correia et al. 2021), and the moderation effect of brand awareness (Yigit 11 and Tıgli 2018). However, there is a lack of studies investigating the moderation-mediation factors in the relationship between BTL advertising and brand loyalty. The fragmentation of existing literature emphasises the need for a moderated mediation model that elucidates the interplay between BTL advertising, competitive advantage, commitment, trust, brand awareness, and brand loyalty. 1.6 Research questions Based on the research problem identified in the previous section, the following research questions are formulated: i. To what extent does BTL advertising influence brand loyalty in the South African B2B solar industry? ii. To what extent does competitive advantage influence brand loyalty in the South African B2B solar industry? iii. To what extent does commitment influence brand loyalty in the South African B2B solar industry? iv. To what extent does trust influence brand loyalty in the South African B2B solar industry? v. Is there a moderated mediation effect of brand awareness on the relationship between BTL advertising and brand loyalty through competitive advantage, commitment, and trust in the South African B2B solar industry? 1.7 Research objectives 1.7.1 Primary research objectives To develop a model based on the moderated mediation effect of brand awareness on the relationship between BTL advertising and brand loyalty through competitive advantage, commitment, and trust in the South African B2B solar industry. 1.7.1.1 Theoretical research objectives i. To review the literature on the B2B advertising effects model, resource-based theory, brand equity theory, and commitment-trust theory. ii. To review the literature on BTL advertising, brand loyalty, competitive advantage, commitment, trust, and brand awareness. 12 1.7.1.2 Empirical research objectives i. To measure the impact of BTL advertising on brand loyalty in the South African solar industry. ii. To evaluate the effect of competitive advantage on brand loyalty in the South African B2B solar industry. iii. To investigate the effect of commitment on brand loyalty in the South African B2B solar industry. iv. To measure the effect of trust on brand loyalty in the South African B2B solar industry. v. To examine the moderated mediation effect of brand awareness on the relationship between BTL advertising and brand loyalty through competitive advantage, commitment and trust in the South African B2B solar industry. 1.8 Theoretical framework This study adopts an inclusive approach by grounding itself in four essential theories: brand equity theory, B2B advertising effects model, RBT, and CTT. These theories were instrumental in identifying key factors contributing directly or indirectly to brand loyalty in the context of the South African B2B solar industry. Each theory is further discussed next. 1.8.1 Brand equity theory The brand equity theory, as initially proposed by Keller (1993) and who subsequently revised the theory in 2008, has been a cornerstone in understanding the dynamics of advertising and its influence on consumer responses (Keller 2008; Khamitov, Grégoire and Suri 2020). The theory emphasises the pivotal role of brand awareness and image in shaping consumer perceptions and includes factors such as perceived quality, brand awareness, brand associations, and brand loyalty (Foroudi, Jin, Gupta, Foroudi and Kitchen 2018). In the B2B context, where distributors sell solar solutions to solar installation companies, the brand equity framework offers insights into building strong and enduring relationships between B2B solar distributors and installation companies. This highlights the importance of cultivating a positive brand image and awareness within this professional network. However, the prevalence of the theory in the literature may be more focused on business-to-consumer contexts, and its application in B2B settings may be relatively limited. The brand equity theory lacks explicit consideration for the rational cognitive process underlying brand loyalty (Syed Alwi, Nguyen, Melewar, Loh and Liu 2016). Brand loyalty, particularly in B2B scenarios, often involves a rational decision-making process influenced by factors beyond mere awareness and 13 associations. The theory falls short in elucidating how brand awareness directly relates to rational brand loyalty, neglecting the cognitive intricacies involved in B2B relationships. Moreover, the theory does not incorporate the B2B advertising effects model, especially concerning the role of advertising in shaping rational brand loyalty. The dynamic nature of customers’ cognitive processes, especially in response to advertising stimuli, remains underexplored within the brand equity framework. This hindrance impacts the understanding of the interplay between advertising, brand awareness, and loyalty in B2B contexts. 1.8.2 Business-to-business advertising effects model The B2B advertising effects model comprehensively outlines how advertising stimuli are processed and responded to within B2B environments. Developed from foundational research by Cortez et al. (2020), the model is structured around three core stages: antecedent conditions, information processing, and consequent conditions. The antecedent conditions involve personal relevance (buy task involvement) and situational specifics. These include factors such as the role within the buying centre and the importance of the purchase, which influence the initial engagement with the advertisement. Information processing can follow two paths: the central route, where the content is critically analysed, or the peripheral route, where the focus is on superficial elements (Zha, Yang, Yan, Liu and Huang 2018). The consequent conditions describe the outcomes of this processing, which can be cognitive (thoughts and judgments about the advertisement content) or emotional (feelings elicited by the advertisement). This model underscores the complexity of B2B buying decisions, which are influenced not just by the content of communications but also by the interplay of individual buyer characteristics and broader situational factors. By accounting for these varied factors, the model provides a nuanced framework for understanding and predicting organisational buying behaviours. This understanding is essential for effectively targeting and influencing B2B customers (Cortez et al. 2020). Despite the strengths of the B2B advertising effects model in explaining the sequential processing of advertising stimuli and the impact of personal and situational factors on such processes, it is often critiqued. The criticism stems from its narrow focus on media-specific influences. This narrow focus somewhat neglects the broader contextual factors that affect decision-making in a B2B context. While Cortez et al. (2020) recognise competing messages as part of the environmental factors that influence the effectiveness of B2B advertising, this recognition does not extend deeply. It fails to cover strategic response mechanisms or differentiation techniques in the face of such competition. Integrating insights from other theories, particularly those that address social and psychological aspects of organisational 14 behaviour, could offer a more comprehensive understanding of customer behaviour. This is especially relevant in relation to brand loyalty (Yoshida, Gordon, Nakazawa, Shibuya and Fujiwara 2018). Additionally, the recognition of the dynamic nature of market conditions and competitor activities suggests that longitudinal or dynamic models could provide deeper insights into how the effects of advertising evolve. In B2B relationships, such as those between solar distributors and installation companies, the B2B advertising effects model can help reveal how advertising affects brand awareness and loyalty (Bilgin 2018). To gain a better understanding of brand loyalty in these B2B settings, it can be beneficial to incorporate insights from the RBT. The RBT, with its focus on competitive advantage, offers a perspective that recognises brand loyalty as stemming from both cognitive outcomes. It also considers the strategic resources and competitive advantages a brand provides in B2B relationships (Shan et al. 2019). This integrated approach would provide a holistic view of brand loyalty, encompassing both cognitive and emotional processes and the strategic value brought by the brand to the B2B relationship. 1.8.3 Resource-based theory Aligned with both the brand equity theory and the B2B advertising effects model, the RBT introduces a unique perspective. It emphasises the crucial role of a firm's internal resources and capabilities in shaping its success and competitive advantage. The RBT is particularly relevant in B2B contexts, where firms often have unique resources, capabilities, and competitive advantages that they leverage to gain a competitive edge (Utami and Alamanos 2022). Business-to-business solar distributors may differentiate themselves based on their resources and capabilities. Furthermore, the theory explicitly links competitive advantage to entrepreneurial success, broadening the study's scope beyond brand loyalty and awareness to include the overall prosperity and longevity of the firm (Alvarez and Barney 2002; Shan et al. 2019). In the context of the solar industry, the RBT could shed light on how a distributor's internal resources contribute to its competitive advantage in the market (Zhang, Hou, Yang, Yang and Wang 2021). These resources include advertising communication and supply chain management. However, the model provides a potentially static view of resources, which can be addressed by adopting a dynamic perspective that recognises the evolution of resources over time (Barney, Ketchen and Wright 2021). Integrating insights from other theories, particularly the CTT, into the RBT can further enrich the study by considering the interpersonal and relational aspects that contribute to brand loyalty in B2B relationships. Empirical validation within the specific context of advertising, brand loyalty, and other 15 variables under investigation would enhance the study. It would confirm the relevance of RBT in the examined scenarios, ultimately providing an understanding of how a firm's internal resources contribute to competitive advantage and entrepreneurial success. 1.8.4 Commitment-trust theory Connected to both the B2B advertising effects model and the RBT previously discussed, the CTT offers a socio-relational perspective on business interactions (Scarpi, Raggiotto and Visentin 2022). Unlike the B2B advertising effects model's emphasis on cognitive processes and the RBT’s focus on internal resources and competition, the CTT delves into the interpersonal dynamics that shape commitment and trust between parties. The theory posits that commitment and trust are reciprocal and mutually reinforcing, creating a foundation for long-term relationships (Agarwal and Narayana 2020). It was initially developed in the e-commerce B2B context (Wang, Wang and Liu 2016). Therefore, in the sphere of B2B transactions where distributors sell to installation companies in the solar industry, the CTT is highly relevant in B2B contexts, where long-term business relationships are crucial. Especially since the CTT takes on special significance by underscoring the importance of relational elements in nurturing loyalty and collaboration. Building trust and commitment between business partners is essential for successful collaborations and ongoing transactions. A relevant model for this study, grounded in the CTT, is the one presented by Suhan, Nayak, Nayak, Spulbar, Bai, Birau, Anghel and Stanciu (2022). This model focuses on the connection between self-expressive tendencies and brand love, with brand commitment and trust acting as mediators, ultimately leading to the outcome of brand loyalty. The next section presents the conceptual framework. 1.9 Conceptual framework and hypothesis development This conceptual framework integrates the brand equity theory (Keller 1993; Bernarto, Berlianto, Meilani, Masman and Suryawan 2020), the B2B advertising effects model (Gilliland and Johnston 1997; Cortez et al. 2020), the RBT (Petty, Cacioppo and Schumann 1983; Shan et al. 2019; Nayak et al. 2023), and the CTT (Morgan and Hunt 1994; Pascual-Ferrá 2021; Alcántara-Pilar, Rodriguez-Lopéz, Kalinić and Liébana- Cabanillas 2024). Through the evaluation of the above theories, seven primary constructs have been identified: (i) BTL advertising, (ii) brand loyalty, (iii) competitive advantage, (iv) commitment, (v) trust, and (vi) brand awareness. 16 The conceptual framework in Figure 1.1 suggests that competitive advantage, commitment, and trust amplify the impact of BTL advertising on brand loyalty in the solar industry, with the degree of enhancement contingent upon the level of brand awareness. In other words, the model examines whether the level of brand awareness regulates the mediating role of competitive advantage, commitment, and trust on the link between BTL advertising and brand. These relationships are specifically examined within the context of B2B interactions between distributors and installation companies in the solar industry. Figure 1.1: Conceptual framework The hypotheses depicted in Figure 1.1, and the conceptual framework, are formulated as follows: − H1:BTL advertising has a positive statistically significant effect on brand loyalty. − H2: Competitive advantage has a statistically significant effect on brand loyalty. − H3: Commitment has a statistically significant effect on brand loyalty. − H4: Trust has a statistically significant effect on brand loyalty. − H5: Brand awareness moderates the mediated role of competitive advantage on the relationship between BTL advertising and brand loyalty. − H6: Brand awareness moderates the mediated role of commitment in the relationship between BTL advertising and brand loyalty. B2B Advertising Effects Model Brand Equity Theory Resource-Based Theory (RBT) Commitment-Trust Theory (CTT) Competitive Advantage BELOW THE LINE ADVERTISING Direct mail advertising Social media advertising Display advertising Brand Loyalty Trust Commitment Brand Equity Theory Brand Awareness H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H7 17 − H7: Brand awareness moderates the mediated role of trust in the relationship between BTL advertising and brand loyalty. 1.10 Methodology This section provides an overview of the research methodology for the study. Research methodology, as defined by Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill (2019), refers to the “steps researchers take to collect and analyse data”. It includes the research philosophy, approach, strategy, time horizons, target population, participant sampling method, data collection methods, questionnaire design, and data analysis methods. 1.10.1 Research philosophy Research philosophy pertains to the researcher's viewpoint on the nature of reality and the researcher- researched relationship (Saunders et al. 2019). It constitutes a foundational aspect of research, including ontology and epistemology considerations, as outlined by Melnikovas (2018). Research philosophy encompasses the scholar’s perspective on reality and the dynamic between the investigator and the subject of study. The main paradigms in the literature include realism, positivism, interpretivism, and pragmatism (Melnikovas 2018; Saunders et al. 2019). Positivism, as emphasised by Park, Konge and Artino (2020), aligns with the research objectives, emphasising empirical observation and quantitative techniques to reveal systematic patterns, associations, and trends. It was chosen for this study to explore the BTL advertising-brand loyalty dynamics within the South African B2B solar industry, aiming to generate findings that are both objective and applicable. 1.10.2 Research approach A research approach serves as the foundational framework guiding the systematic design and execution of a research study, and it can be deductive, abductive, or inductive (Saunders et al. 2019). Considering this study’s intent to examine theories and test hypotheses based on existing literature, a deductive approach was adopted as the guiding orientation (Zefeiti and Mohamad 2015; Casula, Rangarajan and Shields 2021). This approach tests hypotheses derived from theories to confirm or refute relationships between constructs. 18 1.10.3 Research method Within research methodology, various approaches guide the collection and analysis of data including qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods (Creswell and Clark 2017). Given the deductive approach chosen to examine theories and hypotheses testing, along with the need for statistical analysis (Babbie 2016; Casula et al. 2021), the researcher employed a quantitative research method. This choice aligns with the research objectives, allows precise measurement, enhances data reliability, and efficiently manages the study’s scale. Therefore, making it suitable for systematic investigation and hypothesis testing in the context of BTL advertising-brand loyalty dynamics. 1.10.4 Research strategy and time horizons The research strategy serves as a plan outlining how researchers intend to conduct their study, providing a structured framework to address research questions or hypotheses. Several research strategies exist, including but not limited to a survey, experiment, action research, case study, ethnography, grounded theory, archival research, and narrative inquiry (Saunders et al. 2019). Survey research, specifically, involves the collection of data from a sample through standardised questionnaires to uncover patterns and trends (Babbie 2016). Therefore, for this study, the survey research strategy was employed. Surveys are valuable for collecting quantitative data from a wide range of respondents, facilitating the examination of trends and relationships among variables (Babbie 2016). In the context of the South African solar energy industry, utilising surveys will enable the researcher to efficiently obtain insights from a significant number of customers. The quantitative nature of surveys aligns with the deductive approach to theory development chosen for this study, enhancing the capacity to test hypotheses and draw objective conclusions. There are two time horizon modes: cross-sectional studies and longitudinal studies (Saunders et al. 2019). This study adopted a cross-sectional approach. This allowed the capture of data at a specific point in time, offering a snapshot of a particular phenomenon. This approach is appropriate because it allows for efficient data collection from the identified customers. Given the focus on exploring the factors influencing brand loyalty in the South African B2B solar industry, a cross-sectional study provided a timely and inclusive understanding of these dynamics. 19 1.10.5 Target population A population encompasses individuals, objects, or elements with common attributes investigated within a research context (Rashid, Rasheed, Amirah, Yusof, Khan and Agha 2021). In research, it is the larger group from a drawn sample and represents the entities sharing specific traits that researchers aim to understand and analyse. The target population in this study is solar installation companies that purchase products from distributors in South Africa. More specifically, solar installation companies subscribed to IBC SOLAR South Africa (Pty) Ltd.’s newsletter via Mailchimp by a double opt-in process. According to the Protection of Personal Information Act, they shop via their online portal and/or follow their social media pages, including Facebook and LinkedIn. Table 1.1 provides a summary of the size of the target population based on the mentioned platforms. The average reach across the platforms and the size of the target population for this study is 2 307. Concentrating on this population, the study sought insights, opinions, and emotions from individuals genuinely interested in the company’s products and who have consented to communication. This approach ensured data relevance and ethical data collection. The chosen target population was vital for addressing research questions and objectives, as these customers possess prior interactions, providing valuable insights into brand loyalty. Table 1.1: Target population Platform Subscribers Organic reach Mailchimp 1642 353 Online shop 1850 558 Facebook 4199 1910 LinkedIn 3548 6408 Total reach 9229 Average reach 2307 The sampling size was determined by using the historical evidence approach through a comparison of the sample sizes used in previous studies related to this study in combination with a sample size calculator (Khoza, Mafini and Okoumba 2022). The sample size is 330 based on the sample size calculator. This implies that to establish a 95% level of confidence that the actual value falls within a range of ± 5% of the 20 measured or surveyed value, 330 or more measurements or surveys would be required (Calculator.net n.d.). Furthermore, based on the data provided in Tabled 1.2 through the historical evidence approach, the anticipated sample size for this study is 390. This estimate is based on the sample sizes commonly used in similar previous research studies focused on BTL advertising and brand loyalty. Combining these two techniques, the average sample size for this study was determined to be 360 solar installation companies in South Africa. Table 1.2: Sample size Source Sample size Oh and Park (2020) 292 Akoglu and Özbek (2022) 385 Kwon, Jung, Choi and Kim (2021) 376 Rachmawati, Suliyanto and Suroso (2022) 500 Average 390 1.10.6 Sampling Since this study did not have a sampling frame, it employed non-probability sampling, which relies on the researcher's judgment rather than equal chance (Zagheni and Weber 2015). This research specifically made use of convenience sampling. This technique involved selecting respondents from a population without ensuring equal chances for each individual to be included (Rashid et al. 2021). Furthermore, convenience sampling was chosen due to its efficiency in collecting data from readily available respondents, and its cost-effectiveness (Saunders et al. 2019; Obilor 2023). It was particularly suitable for this study due to the homogeneous nature of the target respondents, subscribers of IBC SOLAR’s various platforms. 1.10.7 Data collection 1.10.7.1 Secondary research data Secondary research data involves utilising existing information gathered and documented by other researchers or sources for purposes other than the current study. It entailed using data from sources such as high-impact published literature, reports, databases, and more to address research questions or gain 21 insights without collecting primary data (Hair, Risher, Sarstedt and Ringle 2019). To gather secondary data for this research, various sources such as research articles, books, and online platforms were employed. This information was utilised to perform a literature review, establish a theoretical framework and study background, and inform the design of the survey used for primary data collection. 1.10.7.2 Primary research data Primary research data involved collecting original data from the target respondents (Taguchi 2018). To achieve this, a self-administered questionnaire based on existing literature was utilised. The survey was conducted among a minimum of 420 subscribers to IBC SOLAR’s communication platforms from June to September 2024. This approach allowed for the direct capture of insights and viewpoints from respondents (Bryman 2016). The questionnaire was digitally distributed using Mailchimp Software, the same platform IBC SOLAR currently employs for sending newsletters, banners in the online shop, and Facebook and LinkedIn posts. It was also digitally completed at events such as technical product training. To ensure participant relevance, a thorough cross-referencing process between the newsletter database and the company's business central software was conducted. Additionally, an official data collection authorisation was secured from the IBC SOLAR managing director to ensure compliance. 1.10.7.3 Questionnaire design The first page of the survey clearly outlined the research objectives and emphasised respondents’ confidentiality and their right to withdraw at any point. This section also included informed consent information and screening questions to ensure the inclusion of customers who previously ordered from IBC SOLAR. Section A collected demographic information such as age, gender, years of experience in the solar industry, job title, geographic region, company size, the common brand installed, and frequency of purchasing from the brand. Section B assessed the impact of BTL advertising, competitive advantage, commitment, trust, and brand awareness on brand loyalty. A five and seven-point, strongly disagree/strongly agree, Likert scale was chosen for measurement in the survey due to its ability to provide nuanced and balanced responses. It allows respondents to express a wide range of opinions and attitudes, including neutral or ambivalent positions. This scale also aligns with psychometric principles and facilitates statistical analysis, making it a suitable choice for collecting data on various constructs and attitudes in survey research. Furthermore, to ensure robustness, multi-item measurement scales were used for each construct, addressing potential limitations associated with single-item measures (Hair, 22 Risher et al. 2019). All questionnaire items were adapted from existing literature to ensure content validity. Furthermore, a pilot study was conducted on a sample of 30–40 solar installation companies. They participated in the pilot study to validate and refine the research questionnaire. This preliminary phase was essential for testing the survey's clarity, assessing the time required for completion, and confirming the ethical considerations in obtaining informed consent and ensuring participant confidentiality (In 2017). The pilot study addressed any potential issues or