bil{ 7 lf 90 3~ .JJ.V..I alluor~ .... fERDIE EKSEMPlAAR MAG ONDER /EEN OMSTANDIGHEDE UIT DIE IRLIOTEEK VEfnVYDER WORp NIE University Free State 1111111111111111~11I~11~111~1~~~lll~~~~lll~1111111111111111111111 Universiteit Vrystaat ..;. QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION OF MINERALS IN COAL DEPOSITS IN THE WITBANK AND HIGHVELD COALFIELDS AND THE POTENTIAL IMPACT ON ACID MINE DRAINAGE By Kaydy Lavern Pinetown Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Faculty of Natural Science, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa. May 2003 Supervisor: Prof. W. A. van der Westhuizen ~nlv.r.lteit von die I Oranje-Vrystaat I I ILOfMfOtHE I N i oj 1 9 FEB 2004 UOVS 'AtOL BI'LIOTEEK ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank the following persons and institutions for their assistance with this project: Prof. Willem van der Westhuizen, Chairman of the Department of Geology, University of the Free State, for his endless patience, constructive criticism and valuable advice for the duration of my studies at UFS; Dr. Rudy Boer, Project Leader, for his much appreciated moral support, enthusiasm, and exceptional inspiration; The Water Research Commission for providing this opportunity and financial assistance; My parents, my Creator and my family, for their continuous support, and perpetual faith in me and my abilities; The keen and accommodating management and employees at the mines involved in this study, for assistance during sampling procedures; Prof. Gerhard Beukes from the Department of Geology, University of the Free State, for assisting me on a quest for academic excellence with great enthusiasm and for an enriching collaboration; All lecturers, personnel and friends at the Department of Geology, University of the Free State, for helping me develop my interests in geology and for the memorable time spent at UFS; Prof. Frank Hodgson and Mr. Brent Usher from the Institute of Groundwater Studies, University of the Free State, for their expertise and guidance in the field of groundwater studies; Prof. Colin Ward, Associate Professor at the School of Geology, University of New South Wales, for information gathered at UNSWand sharing his knowledge and wisdom regarding coal mineralogy and geochemistry; And to the following friends, Maretha, Magdalena, Nico, SW, Alida, Annegret, Marianne and Micheal, your encouraging and loyal friendships, especially throughout the difficult months spent on this thesis, is greatly appreciated. ii ABSTRACT A mineralogical and geochemical study on the coal and coal-bearing successions of the Witbank and Highveld Coalfields in the Mpumalanga Province of South Africa was proposed in order to, firstly, investigate the quantitative distribution of minerals in the lithological units, and secondly, to correlate this data with the potential of the units to contribute to acid mine drainage conditions in the region. X-ray diffraction and X-ray fluorescence techniques were used to analyse the samples from the study area. Samples from the No.1, No.2, No.4 and No.5coal seams were collected from several mines in the Witbank Coalfield, while samples from the No.4 and No.5coal seams were collected from borehole material obtained from the Highveld Coalfield. The inorganic components make up approximately 8.00 to 35.00 wt% of a coal sample. Si02 concentrations varied between 0.00 and 35.00 wt% of a sample, AI203 between 0.50 and 16.00 wt%, Fe203 between 0.03 and 10.00 wt%, and S between 0.15 and 8.00 wt%. Minor concentrations of CaO (0.00 to 8.00 wt%) and MgO (0.00 to 1.00 wt%) were present. P205 occurred in concentrations of 0.00 to 3.50 wt% and K20 was in the order of 0.00 to 1.30 wt%. Na20 values were the lowest varying between 0.00 and 0.45 wt%. The only difference in chemistry between Witbank and Highveld coals was a slight increase in Na20 (0.00 to 0.51 wt%) in the Highveld coals. These results were confirmed by the XRD investigations. The mineral components in the XRD patterns were semi-quantitatively evaluated in terms of dominant (>40% of the mineral fraction), major (10-40%), minor (2-10%), accessory (1-2%) and rare « 1%) constituents. The mineral fraction in the coals was dominated by quartz and kaolinite, with major to minor and trace amounts of calcite, dolomite and pyrite, as well as accessory phosphates phases. XRF and XRD results for the coal-bearing units were also in good agreement. Higher K20 and Na20 concentrations were obtained in the sandstones in comparison to the siltstone and carbonaceous shale samples, and were supported by the presence of feldspars and clays such as illite in XRD interpretations. A normative program iii designed for Australian coals and sedimentary rocks, called Sednorm, was used to calculate normative mineralogical compositions from the geochemical results. Good \ correlations were obtained for comparisons made between the chemical composition, mineralogical interpretations and normative results for the coal and sediment samples. Acid-base accounting was used to investigate the potential of the coal and coal- bearing units to produce acid mine drainage conditions. The acid and neutralising potentials are largely dependant on the abundance and availability of minerals such as pyrite and calcite respectively. According to the screening criteria proposed by Usher et al. (2001), averages for Neutralising Potential Ratio (NPR) suggest that all the coal and coal-bearing units, excluding the unit between No. 1 and No. 2 coal seams, are potentially acid generating. The latter lithological unit is considered to be inconclusive. The average Net Neutralising Potential (NNP) values suggest that the NO.5 coal seam, NO.4 Upper coal seam, and between NO.4 and NO.2 coal seams are potentially acid generating. This is a result of the weathering of carbonates in these lithological units. The other units could become either acidic or neutral. In theory it is possible to calculate the AP from the analysed S by multiplying the S value by 31.25. Assuming that all sulphide-S is available for oxidation, then the total S analysed could be used to predict the AP for samples on which no acid-base determinations has been carried out. Similarly, the excellent correlation between the NP and CaO, and between the NP and combined CaO and MgO, confirms that these chemical components are largely responsible for NP values. It is then also possible to predict the NP by using the CaO and MgO concentrations for samples for which no AP or NP data is available. The application of ABA in this study offered a major contribution to understanding the complexities governing water-rock interactions. Results provided a preview of situations that might arise regarding groundwater quality in a certain area, but also offers ample time to decide on appropriate prevention or remediation programs. The potential for these lithological units to contribute to the deterioration of groundwater is evident. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . ABSTRACT........... iii TABLE OF CONTENTS v LIST OF FIGURES................ ix LIST OF TABLES................................. xii ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS xx CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 Overview....................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Location of the studyarea............................... .................................. 1-2 1.3 Geology and tectonic setting........................................................... ... 1-4 1.3.1 The Witbank Coalfield............................................................. 1-7 1.3.1.1 Origin and stratigraphy.................................................... 1-8 1.3.1.2 Descriptionof coal seams................................................ 1-9 1.3.1.3 Structure...................................................................... 1-10 1.3.2 The HighveldCoalfield............................................................ 1-11 1.3.2.1 Originandstratigraphy 1-11 1.3.2.2 Descriptionof coal seams 1-12 1.3.2.3 Structure 1-13 1.4 Palaeo-climate and vegetation............................................................ 1-13 1.5 Palaeo-topography........................................................................... 1-14 1.6 Groundwater and drainage systems.................................................... 1-15 CHAPTER 2: PREVIOUSWORK............................... 2-1 2.1 Geochemistry and mineralogyof the Ecca Group................................ ... 2-1 2.2 Review of mineral matter in coal......................................................... 2-3 2.2.1 Quartz............... 2-5 2.2.2 Clay minerals, feldspars and micas............................................ 2-6 2.2.3 Sulphides............................................................................. 2-8 2.2.4 Carbonates........................... 2-10 2.2.5 Phosphates.......................................................................... 2-10 2.2.6 Other minerals............ 2-11 2.3 Mineral matter in South African coal..................................................... 2-11 CHAPTER 3: GEOCHEMISTRY AND MINERALOGY OF THE COAL AND COAL-BEARING SUCCESSIONS IN THE WITBANK AND HIGHVELD COALFIELDS........ 3-1 3.1 Experimental analytical techniques used in coal mineralogical analyses.. .... 3-1 3.1.1 Experimental proceduresfollowed during this study...................... 3-3 3.2 Distributionof mineral matter in investigated samples and possible mode of occurrence............ 3-16 3.2.1 Chemical composition of coal and sediment samples.................... 3-16 3.2.1.1 TheWitbankCoalfield 3-16 a. NO.1 coal seam.................................................................. 3-16 b. NO.2 coal seam.................................................................. 3-23 c. NO.4 coal seam.................................................................. 3-29 d. NO.5 coal seam...... 3-31 3.2.1.2 The HighveldCoalfield................................................. 3-33 a. NO.4 coal seam.................................................................. 3-33 b. NO.5 coal seam.................................................................. 3-34 3.2.2 X-ray Diffraction Interpretation.................................................. 3-34 3.2.2.1 The Witbank Coalfield............ 3-34 vi a. No.1 coal seam................. 3-35 b. No.2 coal seam...... 3-36 c. No.4 and No.5 coal seams................................................... 3-37 3.2.2.2 The Highveld Coalfield.............................................. ... 3-37 a. No.4 and No.5 coal seams................................................... 3-37 3.2.3 Normative mineralogical interpretation using Sednorm.................. 3-37 3.2.3.1 Coal......................................................................... 3-39 3.2.3.2 Sediments... 3-43 CHAPTER 4: GEOCHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION AND QUALITY OF COLLIERY WATERS 4-1 4.1 Quality of colliery waters............................ 4-1 4.1.1 Sources of acid mine drainage (AMD)........................................ 4-3 4.1.2 The effects of AMD on colliery water quality................... 4-5 4.2 Factors influencing geochemical character of water....... 4-7 4.2.1 Electrical conductivity (EC)...................................................... 4-7 4.2.2 Salinity.. 4-7 4.2.3 pH value......... 4-8 4.2.4 Total suspended solids (TSS) and total dissolved solids (TDS)..... 4-8 4.2.5 Metals................................................................................. 4-8 4.2.6 Inorganic non-metallic constituents.. 4-9 4.2.7 Organic constituents 4-10 4.3 A model for the preliminary assessment of sources of pollution..... 4-11 CHAPTER 5: ACID-BASE ACCOUNTING...... 5-1 5.1 Acid-base determinations for the Witbank and Highveld Coalfields............ 5-1 5.1.1 The Witbank Coalfield.............. 5-3 5.1.2 The Highveld Coalfield........... 5-11 vii CHAPTER 6: DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSiONS...... 6-1 REFERENCES..................................................................................... R-1 APPENDIX 1: ANALYTICAL METHODS USED FOR ROCK AND COAL SAMPLES A1-1 A1.1 X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF)..................... A1-1 A1.1.1 Sample preparation............................................................... A1-1 A1.1.2Technique A1-2 A1.1.2.1 Coal analysis.................................................................. A1-2 a. Calibration standards............................................................ A 1-2 b. Major elements A1-4 c. Trace elements................................................................... A1-5 A1.1.2.2 Rock analysis................................................................. A1-6 a. Calibration standards A1-6 b. Major elements................................................................... A1-6 c. Trace elements A1-7 A1.2 X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD)......................................................... A1-8 A1.2.1 Sample preparation.................................... ................ ..... ...... A1-8 A1.2.2 Technique........................ A1-8 APPENDIX 2: ANALYTICAL RESULTS...... A2-1 APPENDIX 3: ACID-BASE ACCOUNTING RESULTS................................... A3-1 3.1 Objective of the procedure.............................. A3-1 3.2 Acid and neutralising potential........ A3-1 APPENDIX 4: BOREHOLE LOGS A4-1 viii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1 - The distribution of coal fields in the five relevant provinces (H - Highveld coalfield, W - Witbank coalfield)..... 1-3 Figure 1.2 - Collieries in Mpumalanga as well as southern boundary between Witbank and Highveld coal fields, and eastern boundary of Highveld coal field... 1-3 Figure 1.3 - Lithostratigraphic nomenclature for the Karoo Supergroup............ 1-5 Figure 1.4 - Geological map of the studyarea............................................. 1-6 Figure 1.5 - Locality of some opencast and underground mines in the Witbank and Highveld Coalfields........................................................................... 1-7 Figure 1.6 - Stratigraphic columns for different parts of the Witbank Coalfield.... 1-8 Figure 1.7 - Stratigraphic columns for different parts of the Highveld Coalfield.... 1-11 Figure 1.8 - Surface contours of the Mpumalanga Coalfields.......................... 1-15 Figure 1.9 - Drainage map of the Mpumalanga Coalfields.............................. 1-16 Figure 3.1 - Relationship between Whole coal Fe203% and UFS Fe203% at 1050oC... 3-11 Figure 3.2 - Relationship between Whole coal Si02% and UFS Si02% at 1050oC... 3-12 Figure 3.3 - Relationship between Whole coal A1203% and UFS A1203% at 1080°C 3-12 Figure 3.4 - Relationship between Whole coal CaO% and UFS CaO% at 1080°C................................................................................................ 3-13 Figure 3.5 - Relationship between Ti02 and AI203 concentrations................... 3-19 Figure 3.6 - Relationship between K20 and Ba concentrations..................... 3-20 Figure 3.7 - Relationship between Fe203 and S concentrations......... 3-20 Figure 3.8 - Si02 distribution in the NO.2 coal seam.............................. 3-24 Figure 3.9 - Ti02 distribution in the NO.2 coal seam..... 3-24 Figure 3.10 - Ab03 distribution in the NO.2 coal seam.................................. 3-25 Figure 3.11 - Na20 distribution in the NO.2 coal seam.................................. 3-25 Figure 3.12 - K20 distribution in the NO.2 coal seam 3-26 Figure 3.13 - Fe203 distribution in the NO.2 coal seam................................. 3-27 Figure 3.14 - S distribution in the NO.2 coal seam......... 3-27 Figure 3.15 - Relationship between Fe203 and S concentrations................ 3-28 ix Figure 3.16 - Variations in concentration of some element oxides and sulphide in No.4 coal seam................................................................................ 3-34 Figure 3.17 - Relationship between normative Quartz and Si02 percentages in coal samples........................................................................................ 3-39 Figure 3.18 - Relationship between normative Pyrite and Fe203 percentages in coal samples........................................................................................ 3-40 Figure 3.19 - Relationship between normative Siderite and Fe203 percentages in coal samples........... 3-41 Figure 3.20 - Relationship between normative Magnesite and MgO percentages in coal samples.................................................................... 3-41 Figure 3.21 - Relationship between normative Calcite and CaO percentages in coal samples........................................................................................ 3-42 Figure 3.22 - Relationship between normative Apatite and P20Spercentages in coal samples........................................................................................ 3-43 Figure 3.23 - Relationship between normative K-feldspar and K20 percentages in sediment samples............... 3-43 Figure 3.24 - Relationship between normative Kaolinite and AI203 percentages in sediment samples.............................................................................. 3-44 Figure 3.25 - Relationship between normative Illite-Smectite and K20 percentages in sediment samples............................................................. 3-45 Figure 4.1 - Surface area dissolution rates for source minerals far from solubility equilibrium at oxic conditions and pH 5 and 25°C............................. 4-12 Figure 4.2 - Relationship between trends in pH with the lifetime of minerals that produce and consume acidity................................................................... 4-13 Figure 5.1 - Initial and final pH of the samples before and after complete pyrite oxidation and carbonate dissolution........................................................... 5-4 Figure 5.2 - Acid potential (for an open system) for the Witbank Coalfield......... 5-5 Figure 5.3 - Neutralising potential for the Witbank Coalfield....... 5-6 Figure 5.4 - Acid potential (for an open and closed system) and neutralising potential for the Witbank Coalfield........ 5-7 Figure 5.5 - Net neutralising potential for the Witbank Coalfield.................. 5-7 Figure 5.6 - Acid potential (for an open and closed system) and net neutralising potential (for an open and closed system) for the Witbank Coalfield.............. ... 5-8 x Figure 5.7 - Acid potential (for an open system) and sulphur % 5-9 Figure 5.8 - Neutralising potential and CaO % 5-10 Figure A2-1 - Some X-ray diffraction scans used for qualitative mineralogical interpretation........................................................................................ A2-87 Figure A2-2 - Some X-ray diffraction scans used for qualitative mineralogical interpretation........................................................................................ A2-88 Figure A2-3 - Some X-ray diffraction scans used for qualitative mineralogical interpretation. .............. .................... ......................... ............... ... .......... A2-89 Figure A2-4 - Some X-ray diffraction scans used for qualitative mineralogical interpretation........................................................................................ A2-90 Figure A2-5 - Some X-ray diffraction scans used for qualitative mineralogical interpretation............... A2-91 Figure A2-6 - Some X-ray diffraction scans used for qualitative mineralogical interpretation........................................................................................ A2-92 Figure A2-7 - X-ray diffraction scans of sample LU1 heated for experimental purposes............................................................................................. A2-93 Figure A2-8 - X-ray diffraction scans of sample LU24 heated for experimental purposes.... A2-94 Figure A2-9 - X-ray diffraction scan of sample M20 for experimental purposes... A2-95 Figure A2-10 - X-ray diffraction scan of sample M20 ashed in LTA for experimental purposes...................................... A2-96 Figure A2-11 - X-ray diffraction scan of sample KOR10 for experimental purposes............................................................................................. A2-97 Figure A2-12 - X-ray diffraction scan of sample KOR10 ashed in LTA for experimental purposes........ A2-98 xi LIST OF TABLES Table 3-1: Results after heating for 50 hours at 350°C (units in grams)............. 3-5 Table 3-2: Results after heating for 60 hours at 250°C (units in grams). 3-6 Table 3-3: Results after heating for 70 hours at 150°C (units in grams)............. 3-6 Table 3-4: UFS XRF data -1050°C ash.............................................. 3-9 Table 3-5: UFS XRF data - 1050°C ash - normalised LOl and H20 free........ 3-9 Table 3-6: UFS XRF data -1080°C ash 3-10 Table 3-7: UFS XRF data -1080°C ash - normalised LOl and H20 free 3-10 Table 3-8: UFS XRF data - Whole coal analyses......................................... 3-11 Table 3-9: UFS XRF data - Whole coal analyses - normalised LOl, H20 and S free... 3-11 Table 3-10: UFS XRF data - Whole coal analyses - Mixtures of samples LK1 and LU13 3-14 Table 3-11: The minimum, maximum and average concentrations of oxides (wt%) and trace elements (ppm) in No.1 coal seam..................................... 3-17 Table 3-12: The minimum, maximum and average concentrations of oxides (wt%) and trace elements (ppm) in siltstone floor rocks of No.1 coal seam... ..... 3-21 Table 3-13: The minimum, maximum and average concentrations of oxides (wt%) and trace elements (ppm) in sandstone roof rocks of No.1 coal seam. ..... 3-22 Table 3.14: The minimum, m, aximum and average concentrations of oxides (wt%) and trace elements (ppm) in sandstone floor rocks of No.2 coal seam.. ... 3-28 Table 3.15: The minimum, maximum and average concentrations of oxides (wt%) and trace elements (ppm) in No.4 coal seam.......................... 3-31 Table 3.16: The minimum, maximum and average concentrations of oxides (wt%) and trace elements (ppm) in No.5 coal seam................ 3-32 Table 5-1: Average NPR (NP: AP) ratio and NNP for lithological units of the Witbank Coalfield (open system)...... 5-10 Table 5-2: Average NPR (NP: AP) ratio and NNP for lithological units of the Highveld Coalfield (open system). 5-12 Table A1-1: Major and trace element concentrations of reference materials used for coal analyses............................................................................ A1-3 xii Table A1-2: Analytical conditions for determining major element concentrations for coal analyses.................................................................................... A1-4 Table A1-3: Analytical conditions for determining trace element concentrations for coal analyses.................................................................................... A1-5 Table A1-4: Analytical conditions for determining major element concentrations for rock analyses................................................................................... A1-6 Table A1-5: Analytical conditions for determining trace element concentrations for rock analyses................................................................................... A1-7 Table A2-1: Coordinates for samples collected at Arnot Colliery.... A2-1 Table A2-2: Coordinates for samples collected at Arnot-North Colliery........... A2-2 Table A2-3: Coordinates for samples collected at Bank Colliery................... A2-2 Table A2-4: Coordinates for samples collected at Bankfontein Colliery....... A2-3 Table A2-5: Coordinates for samples collected from Borehole 1.............. A2-3 Table A2-6: Coordinates for samples collected from Borehole wedge 1. A2-3 Table A2-7: Coordinates for samples collected from Borehole wedge 2. A2-3 Table A2-8: Coordinates for samples collected from Borehole wedge 3............ A2-4 Table A2-9: Coordinates for samples collected from Borehole wedge 4............ A2-4 Table A2-10: Coordinates for samples collected from Borehole wedge 5 A2-4 Table A2-11: Coordinates for samples collected at Delmas Colliery........... A2-5 Table A2-12: Coordinates for samples collected at Douglas Colliery A2-5 Table A2-13: Coordinates for samples collected at Forzando Colliery A2-6 Table A2-14: Coordinates for samples collected at Greenside Colliery..... A2-6 Table A2-15: Coordinates for samples collected at Kleinkopje Colliery A2-7 Table A2-16: Coordinates for samples collected at Khutala Colliery.............. A2-7 Table A2-17: Coordinates for samples collected at Koornfontein Colliery A2-8 Table A2-18: Coordinates for samples collected at Kromdraai Colliery A2-8 Table A2-19: Coordinates for samples collected at Lakeside Colliery...... A2-9 Table A2-20: Coordinates for samples collected at Leeufontein Colliery...... A2-9 Table A2-21: Coordinates for samples collected at Middelburg Colliery.. A2-9 Table A2-22: Coordinates for samples collected at Optimum Colliery......... A2-10 Table A2-23: Coordinates for samples collected at Rietspruit Colliery A2-10 Table A2-24: Coordinates for samples collected at South Witbank Colliery.... A2-11 Table A2-25: Coordinates for samples collected at Tavistock Colliery............... A2-11 xiii Table A2-26: Coordinates for samples collected at Union Colliery........... ..... .... A2-11 Table A2-27: Major element oxide concentrations for Arnot Colliery................. A2-12 Table A2-28: Major element oxide concentrations for Arnot-North Colliery A2-13 Table A2-29: Major element oxide concentrations for Bank Colliery A2-14 Table A2-30: Major element oxide concentrations for Bankfontein Colliery..... A2-15 Table A2-31: Major element oxide concentrations for Borehole 1...... A2-15 Table A2-32: Major element oxide concentrations for Borehole wedge 1....... A2-15 Table A2-33: Major element oxide concentrations for Borehole wedge 2 A2-16 Table A2-34: Major element oxide concentrations for Borehole wedge 3 A2-16 Table A2-35: Major element oxide concentrations for Borehole wedge 4 A2-17 Table A2-36: Major element oxide concentrations for Borehole wedge 5........... A2-17 Table A2-37: Major element oxide concentrations for Delmas Colliery.............. A2-18 Table A2-38: Major element oxide concentrations for Douglas Colliery............. A2-19 Table A2-39: Major element oxide concentrations for Forzando Colliery........ A2-20 Table A2-40: Major element oxide concentrations for Greenside Colliery.... A2-21 Table A2-41: Major element oxide concentrations for Kleinkopje Colliery A2-22 Table A2-42: Major element oxide concentrations for Khutala Colliery.............. A2-22 Table A2-43: Major element oxide concentrations for Koornfontein Colliery... A2-23 Table A2-44: Major element oxide concentrations for Kromdraai Colliery....... A2-24 Table A2-45: Major element oxide concentrations for Lakeside Colliery............ A2-24 Table A2-46: Major element oxide concentrations for Leeufontein Colliery..... A2-25 Table A2-47: Major element oxide concentrations for Middelburg Colliery.. A2-26 Table A2-48: Major element oxide concentrations for Optimum Colliery... A2-27 Table A2-49: Major element oxide concentrations for Rietspruit Colliery.... A2-27 Table A2-50: Major element oxide concentrations for South Witbank Colliery. A2-28 Table A2-51: Major element oxide concentrations for Tavistock Colliery..... A2-28 Table A2-52: Major element oxide concentrations for Union Colliery A2-29 Table A2-53: Trace element concentrations for Arnot Colliery............. A2-30 Table A2-54: Trace element concentrations for Arnot-North Colliery...... A2-31 Table A2-55: Trace element concentrations for Bank Colliery... A2-32 Table A2-56: Trace element concentrations for Bankfontein Colliery......... A2-33 Table A2-57: Trace element concentrations for Borehole 1.. A2-33 Table A2-58: Trace element concentrations for Borehole wedge 1... A2-33 xiv Table A2-59: Trace element concentrations for Borehole wedge 2................... A2-34 Table A2-60: Trace element concentrations for Borehole wedge 3................... A2-34 Table A2-61: Trace element concentrations for Borehole wedge 4................... A2-35 Table A2-62: Trace element concentrations for Borehole wedge 5................... A2-35 Table A2-63: Trace element concentrations for Delmas Colliery................... A2-36 Table A2-64: Trace element concentrations for Douglas Colliery............... A2-37 Table A2-65: Trace element concentrations for Forzando Colliery A2-38 Table A2-66: Trace element concentrations for Greenside Colliery.... A2-39 Table A2-67: Trace element concentrations for Kleinkopje Colliery.................. A2-40 Table A2-68: Trace element concentrations for Khutala Colliery...................... A2-40 Table A2-69: Trace element concentrations for Koornfontein Colliery............... A2-41 Table A2-70: Trace element concentrations for Kromdraai Colliery.... A2-42 Table A2-71: Trace element concentrations for Lakeside Colliery............... A2-42 Table A2-72: Trace element concentrations for Leeufontein Colliery A2-43 Table A2-73: Trace element concentrations for Middelburg Colliery A2-44 Table A2-74: Trace element concentrations for Optimum Colliery......... A2-45 Table A2-75: Trace element concentrations for Rietspruit Colliery..... A2-45 Table A2-76: Trace element concentrations for South Witbank Colliery A2-46 Table A2-77: Trace element concentrations for Tavistock Colliery............ A2-46 Table A2-78: Trace element oxide concentrations for Union Colliery................ A2-47 Table A2-79: Mineral composition of samples for Arnot Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM A2-48 Table A2-80: Mineral composition of samples for Arnot-North Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM................................. A2-49 Table A2-81: Mineral composition of samples for Bank Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM A2-50 Table A2-82: Mineral composition of samples for Bankfontein Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM... A2-51 Table A2-83: Mineral composition of samples for Borehole 1 as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM......... A2-52 Table A2-84: Mineral composition of samples for Borehole wedge 1 as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM................................. A2-52 xv Table A2-85: Mineral composition of samples for Borehole wedge 2 as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM................................. A2-53 Table A2-86: Mineral composition of samples for Borehole wedge 3 as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM.... A2-53 Table A2-87: Mineral composition of samples for Borehole wedge 4 as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM... A2-54 Table A2-88: Mineral composition of samples for Borehole wedge 5 as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM... A2-55 Table A2-89: Mineral composition of samples for Delmas Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM................................. A2-55 Table A2-90: Mineral composition of samples for Douglas Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM................................. A2-56 Table A2-91: Mineral composition of samples for Forzando Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM... A2-58 Table A2-92: Mineral composition of samples for Greenside Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM... A2-58 Table A2-93: Mineral composition of samples for Kleinkopje Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM... A2-60 Table A2-94: Mineral composition of samples for Khutala Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM................................. A2-60 Table A2-95: Mineral composition of samples for Koornfontein Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM................................. A2-61 Table A2-96: Mineral composition of samples for Kromdraai Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM................................. A2-62 Table A2-97: Mineral composition of samples for Lakeside Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM................................. A2-63 Table A2-98: Mineral composition of samples for Leeufontein Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM................................. A2-63 Table A2-99: Mineral composition of samples for Middelburg Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM................................. A2-64 Table A2-100: Mineral composition of samples for Optimum Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM................................. A2-65 xvi Table A2-101: Mineral composition of samples for Rietspruit Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM.... A2-66 Table A2-102: Mineral composition of samples for South Witbank Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM... A2-67 Table A2-103: Mineral composition of samples for Tavistock Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM..... A2-67 Table A2-104: Mineral composition of samples for Union Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM A2-68 Table A2-105: Mineral composition of samples for Arnot Colliery as interpreted from XRD scans.................................................................................... A2-69 Table A2-106: Mineral composition of samples for Arnot-North Colliery as interpreted from XRD scans.................................................. A2-70 Table A2-107: Mineral composition of samples for Bank Colliery as interpreted from XRD scans........................... A2-71 Table A2-108: Mineral composition of samples for Bankfontein Colliery as interpreted from XRD scans...... A2-72 Table A2-109: Mineral composition of samples for Borehole 1 as interpreted from XRD scans...... A2-72 Table A2-110: Mineral composition of samples for Borehole wedge 1 as interpreted from XRD scans.... A2-72 Table A2-111: Mineral composition of samples for Borehole wedge 2 as interpreted from XRD scans.... A2-73 Table A2-112: Mineral composition of samples for Borehole wedge 3 as interpreted from XRD scans.. A2-73 Table A2-113: Mineral composition of samples for Borehole wedge 4 as interpreted from XRD scans....... A2-74 Table A2-114: Mineral composition of samples for Borehole wedge 5 as interpreted from XRD scans. A2-74 Table A2-115: Mineral composition of samples for Delmas Colliery as interpreted from XRD scans....... A2-75 Table A2-116: Mineral composition of samples for Douglas Colliery as interpreted from XRD scans........... A2-76 xvii Table A2-117: Mineral composition of samples for Forzando Colliery as interpreted from XRD scans.................... A2-77 Table A2-118: Mineral composition of samples for Greenside Colliery as interpreted from XRD scans..................................................................... A2-78 Table A2-119: Mineral composition of samples for Kleinkopje Colliery as interpreted from XRD scans.... A2-79 Table A2-120: Mineral composition of samples for Khutala Colliery as interpreted from XRD scans..................................................................... A2-79 Table A2-121: Mineral composition of samples for Koornfontein Colliery as interpreted from XRD scans..................................................................... A2-80 Table A2-122: Mineral composition of samples for Kromdraai Colliery as interpreted from XRD scans....................... A2-81 Table A2-123: Mineral composition of samples for Lakeside Colliery as interpreted from XRD scans.......................... A2-81 Table A2-124: Mineral composition of samples for Leeufontein Colliery as interpreted from XRD scans........................ A2-81 Table A2-125: Mineral composition of samples for Middelburg Colliery as interpreted from XRD scans..................................................................... A2-83 Table A2-126: Mineral composition of samples for Optimum Colliery as interpreted from XRD scans..................................................................... A2-83 Table A2-127: Mineral composition of samples for Rietspruit Colliery as interpreted from XRD scans..................................................................... A2-84 Table A2-128: Mineral composition of samples for South Witbank Colliery as interpreted from XRD scans..................................................................... A2-85 Table A2-129: Mineral composition of samples for Tavistock Colliery as interpreted from XRD scans..................................................................... A2-85 Table A2-130: Mineral composition of samples for Union Colliery as interpreted from XRD scans.................................................................. A2-86 Table A3-1: Acid-base determinations for some coal and rock samples from the Witbank Coalfield................................................................................... A3-2 Table A3-2: Average acid-base potential results for the different lithologies of the Witbank Coalfield..... A3-4 xviii Table A3-3: Acid-base determinations for some coal and rock samples from the Highveld Coalfield.................................................................................. A3-4 Table A3-4: Average acid-base potential results for the different lithologies of the Highveld Coalfield............................................................................. A3-4 xix ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS • ABA Acid-base Accounting • AMD Acid Mine Drainage • AP Acid Potential • BOC Biochemical Oxygen Demand • COD Chemical Oxygen Demand • EC Electrical Conductivity • g/kg Grams per Kilogram • LOl Loss on Ignition • LTA Low-temperature Ashing • mg/L Milligram per Litre • mol S-1 Moles per Second • mS/m Millisiemens per meter • MO Megaohm • NAG Net Acid Generating Test • NNP Net Neutralising Potential • NP Neutralising Potential • NPR Neutralising Potential Ratio • 0 Ohm • TOS Total Dissolved Solids • TOC Total Organic Carbon • TSS Total Suspended Solids • XRD X-ray Diffraction • XRF X-ray Fluorescence xx CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Overview The combustion of organic material in coal by power stations is probably one of the main activities by which the coal mining and manufacturing industry produces pollutants. These pollutants affect different areas in our environment. Underground and opencast mining activities take place together with excessive use of water. After being extracted the coal is then processed to form synthetic fuels, gases, and numerous by-products which prove to make human existence simpler. Yet the sacrifice we make in order to reach this stage of supremacy over what is at our disposal, is not always justifiable. If one considers the repercussions of activities such as mining, the deleterious effects are wide-spread. The mining of coal exposes this resource to ideal conditions for unfavourable reactions to take place. Acid mine drainage (AMD) conditions are primarily caused by the oxidation of the sulphide minerals. However, in coal mines, the minerals pyrite (FeS2) and marcasite (FeS2) are largely responsible for an AMD problem. The use of water during coal mining provides a suitable medium and supplies sufficient oxygen for pyrite oxidation to occur. The rate of oxidation is dependant on temperature, pH, oxygen concentration, chemical composition of the pore water and microbial population (Azzie, 1999). Waters affected by these reactions are often strongly acidic, and often accumulate in underground workings and aquifers. However, attaining these conditions is more complex than just the oxidation of sulphide minerals. Various reactions between many other mineral phases give rise to a complex combination of constituents with numerous adverse effects on the surrounding environment. It is this interaction between minerals and the immediate environment, especially the surrounding groundwater, which creates the real problem associated with coal mining. 1-1 In order to specify the cause and find a solution to this problem it is necessary to investigate, firstly, exactly what is being dealt with in terms of the nature of coal (i.e. minerals, macerals, fixed carbon, moisture, etc.) and secondly, attempt to quantify the extent to which interaction has taken place or could take place between the coal and the environment. Thus, the objective of this study is to provide a basic mineralogical database for coals in the Witbank and Highveld coal fields, and to investigate the potential of these rocks to produce acidic or alkaline conditions. The investigation aims at constructing a practical representation of the distribution of minerals. Thus, predicting future AMD occurrences might be possible. Although most of the mines in the region has been active for the last century (Snyman, 1998; Smith and Whittaker, 1986a), only recently has the problem of acid mine drainage been addressed. Certain areas in the Witbank and Highveld coal fields are characterised by lush, green surfaces covering previously exploited underground operations, which could and often do collapse at any instance, while voids in these workings often contain acidic water. However, most mining companies today have made a concerted effort to ensure that similar situations do not arise in future once mining has ceased. Therefore, to be able to proceed with mining and rehabilitation in such way to ensure that the same scenario does not occur, the results from an investigation such as this would be exceptionally useful. 1.2 Location of the study area The Witbank coal field is situated east of Johannesburg. The southern boundary of the coal field is considered to extend from approximately 5 km south of Delmas Colliery in an east-northeast direction to about 5 km south of South Witbank Colliery. From this point eastwards, for about 60 km, a natural boundary is formed by a series of inliers of Rooiberg Group felsite, known as the Smithfield ridge. 1-2 Figure 1.1 - The distribution of the coal fields in the five relevant provinces (H - Highveld coalfield, W - Witbank coalfield) to Groblersdal ...- -_ -- Komatipoort. JJ ( to Ver9ne to Pr9tooa ~~hOrs 25 _..... spruit SWAZILAND _ Ogiesdyke •••••••• Boundary between coal fields ! -- RoadsStanderton •••••••". .._ •..... Major railways (schematic) N x 52 o 10 20 30 kmMAJUBA to Wakkerstroom Figure 1.2 - Collieries in Mpumalanga as well as southern boundary between Witbank and Highveld coal fields, and eastern boundary of Highveld coal field (after Snyman, 1998) 1-3 The Highveld Coalfield is situated south of the Witbank Coalfield. Its eastern boundary is formed by a straight line through Hendrina, Davel and Morgenzon (Snyman, 1998) (Figure 1.1 and Figure 1.2). 1.3 Geology and tectonic setting After the Pan-African tectonothermal event which brought about the assembly of Gondwana, the southern edge of this super-continent experienced a prolonged period of sedimentation. The Cape Supergroup was deposited from the Ordovician to the upper Devonian as beach, deltaic and shallow marine clastic sediments on a broad, relatively stable platform. The Cape Fold Belt was part of the more extensive Pan Gondwanian Mobile Belt generated through compression, collision and terrain accretion along the southern margin of Gondwana. The associated foreland basin fragmented as a result of Gondwana break-up, and is preserved today in South America (Parana Basin), southern Africa (Karoo Basin), Antarctica (Beacon Basin) and Australia (Bowen Basin) (Catuneanu et aI., 199B). The Karoo Basin is a retroarc foreland basin developed in the front of the Cape Fold Belt, in relationship to the Late Palaeozoic-Early Mesozoic subduction episode of the palaeo-Pacific plate underneath the Gondwana plate. The maximum megasequence of the Karoo sedimentary succession exceeds 6km and reflects changing environments from glacial to deep marine, deltaic, fluvial and aeolian (Catuneanu et aI., 1998). A period of glacial sedimentation during the Permian-Carboniferous marks the beginning of numerous phases giving rise to the formation of the Karoo Supergroup in which most of the coal deposits of southern Africa are deposited (Thomas et aI., 1993). Diamictites and associated fluvio-glacial sediments of the Dwyka Group were deposited by both grounded and floating ice (Catuneanu et aI., 1998). After glaciation a shallow sea remained, fed by large volumes of meltwater (Smith et aI., 1993). Black clays and muds accumulated on the submerged platform under cold climatic conditions to form the Lower Ecca Group, while deltas prograded and eventually combined to form broad alluvial plains constituting the Upper Ecca Group. 1-4 The distribution and the thickness of the lower seams are controlled mainly by glacial, pre-Karoo valleys and pre-Karoo topographic highs, while the upper seams were controlled by the basinward extent of delta progradation and by pre-Karoo topographical highs around the basin margin (Smith and Whittaker, 1986a). Towards the end of the Upper Permian (Figure 1.3) the deposits of the Beaufort Group formed on semi-arid alluvial plains mainly as a result of floodplain aggradation. With increased aridification debris fans prograded into the central parts of the basin (Molteno Formation) and these fans were later drained by meandering belts (Elliot Formation). The periodic floods together with aeolian sand dune deposits were preserved as the Clarens Formation which marks the end of Karoo sedimentation. The wide range of structural and sedimentary settings, together with various ages, climates, and plant communities are the reasons for the difference in organic and inorganic material and the degree of maturity or rank of the coals of the region (Falcon, 1986). This will be discussed in further detail in the next section. SUPERGROUP AGE (Ma) GROUP FORMATION 140 Drakensberg Jurassic 195 Drakensberg Clarens 225 Triassic Elliot 0 0 230 Upper Permian Beaufort Adelaide Subgroupcr: ;2 Volksrust Middle Permian Ecca Vryheid 260 Pietermaritzbu rg 300 Lower Permian Dwyka Figure 1.3 - Lithostratigraphic nomenclature for the Karoo Supergroup (after Azzie, 2002) 1-5 Geology of the study area GEOLOGICAL LEGEND- g- = ~ Q. ~ E .~~J~:Ii~:DEcca Group g ~ D Dwyk. Group ~ § D Diabase; dyke il .Waterberg Supergroup ~ _ lobowa Granito Suito L___ ~ ~ Rustonburg layered Sults] _ CO g- t=:I Rooiborg Group } !! • Dullstroom Fm., Pretoria Group ~ D Houtonbok Fm., Protoria Group g- DSliverton Fm., Pretoria Group ~ _ Daspoort Fm., Pretoria Group ~ D Malmani Fm., Chunlespoort Group ~ _ Ventersdorp Supergroup ~ D Witwatersrand Supergroup _Vaaldam 5~0 ~-0-~~50~~~10-0 Kilom-eters --~s *Geologk.llegend Keonling to the Geologic .. m.p of the Republic of SOfAhArrie•• nd the Kingdom. or Le.otho and Swaziland,1nl Figure 1.4 - Geological map of the study area The regional geology of the study area is illustrated in Figure 1.4. The area is characterised by numerous post-Karoo age dolerite sills and dykes, while rocks of the Vryheid Formation of the Ecca Group covers most of the surface area. Five separate bituminous coal seams are preserved in the Vryheid Formation (Cairneross, 2001), and were deposited under cool, wet climatic conditions. To the north the Transvaal Supergroup and the Ventersdorp Supergroup can be observed, as well as several tillite and diamictite of the Dwyka Group outcrops (Figure 1.4). 1-6 1.3.1 The Witbank Coalfield The Witbank coalfield, also previously known as the Springs-Witbank Coalfield, is currently the most important coalfield in the country, and extends over a distance of some 180km from Brakpan and Springs areas in the west, to Belfast in the east and about 40km in a north-south direction. The mines in this coalfield are situated primarily within the Olifants River Catchment (Figure 1.5) (Smith and Whittaker, 1986b). -2830000+---------'-- BELFAST MIDDELBURG ~t..WITBANK .,_ t -2860000 Komati Catchment WI ..... t '. . •> .0- .., t LEGEND I .6Seam -2890000 .4Seam HENORINA ,,' .2Seam iIl'l.Ji.. .1SeamOlifants ~Catchment I Catchments ~i - Rivers -Roads -2920000 BETHAL /,~""'" ERMELO -2950000 Vaal Catchment < OrooldrMl "...., 0- ~ -----~~~~ -~". -~r---- 90000 120000 Figure 1.5 - Locality map of same opencast and underground mines in the Witbank and Highveld Coalfields 1-7 1.3.1.1 Origin and stratigraphy The strata of the Vryheid Formation and the Dwyka Group of the Karoo Supergroup in the study area consist primarily of sandstone, carbonaceous shale, siltstone, minor conglomerate and several coal seams (Cairneross, 2001). Stratigraphic columns from different parts of the coalfield are illustrated in Figure 1.6. This wide range of sedimentary and structural settings within which the coal seams were deposited, combined with the range in age, climate and plant communities give rise to the numerous differences in terms of organic and inorganic matter and the degree of maturity of the coal seams (Falcon, 1986). ® ® (@) SPRINGS COLLIERY LESLIE OGIES LANDAU 3 SPRINGBOK GOEDEHOOP BANK ARNOT BELFAST AREA AREA AREA AREA COLLIERY COWERY AREA COLLIERY COLLIERY AREA bj Sooi PO !IilllCIay IT ft.j ~ ShaIe.grey to block20 :..:,. ~Sholecndsondslone intetbe~.= I '7~ -j - ·2090000 I' Olifants Catchment ·moooo L ERMelO ·2050000 \ aal Catchment ( I .,..ooooL _ (~t.:f~--v- I ·30000 :tOOOO 0<>000 00000 '20000 "0000 Figure 1.9 - Drainage map of the Mpumalanga Coalfields According to Azzie (1999) and Grobbelaar (2001) two groundwater systems are present, namely, the weathered and unweathered Ecca Group\Vryheid Formation aquifers. The first lies between depths of 5 and 12m below surface and occurs at the interface of soil and bedrock. Rainfall infiltrating into the weathered rock reaches impermeable layers of sediments below the weathered zone. Groundwater flow patterns usually follow the topography. The aquifer within the weathered zone is generally low-yielded (range 100 - 2000 Uhour) because of it's insignificant thickness (Hodgson and Krantz, 1998). The lower system occurring in the unweathered Vryheid Formation consists of sandstones, siltstones, shales and coal. Groundwater within these sediments will be contained within fractures, joints and bedding planes. The Ogies Dyke is impermeable over much of it's length and thus compartmentalizes the groundwater. The coal seams have the highest hydraulic conductivity of all lithological units in the Ecca Group (Grobbelaar, 2001). The depth of the water table is between 1 and 8m below surface, and water levels have been recorded to be within 5 to 15m of the ground surface. Pre-Karoo aquifers 1-16 are not tapped often due to their great depths and low-yielding character (Grobbelaar, 2001). 1-17 CHAPTER 2 PREVIOUS WORK 2.1 Geochemistry and mineralogy of the Ecca Group Various factors affect the major and trace element distributions in sedimentary rocks. These would include variables such as source rock compositions, intensity of weathering, sedimentation rates, depositional environments, and diagenesis. Depending on the depositional history and the above-mentioned factors, different mineral assemblages are observed in different lithologies. The Ecca Group becomes more shaly in a southerly direction and is composed almost entirely of shale south of a line through Bloemfontein and Harding. The Vryheid Formation can be divided into several cycles of sedimentation in which a succession of depositional environments can be recognized (Van Vuuren and Cole, 1979). Coarse, fluviodeltaic sandstones make up the proximal facies of this gently subsiding shelf platform, and wedges out into siltstone and mudstone facies (Pietermaritzburg and Volksrust Formations) in the south (Snyman, 1998). The formation is composed mainly of coarse-grained arkose, conglomerate, micaceous siltstone, carbonaceous shale, coal seams and thin layers of limestone (Stratten, 1986). Although numerous references are available with regard to the structural, environmental and depositional conditions of the Karoo Basin, limited literature is available on the mineralogy and geochemistry of these sediments. Furthermore, increasing interest in the latter fields has not been prominent. The section of this study concerning the chemical investigation of the coal-bearing successions in the Karoo Supergroup is therefore a generous contribution to the knowledge on the topic. Previous work in this regard involved a brief petrological study on the coal-bearing strata of the Ecca sediments by BLihmann and BLihmann (1988) as part of a research project. Coal and rock samples were collected from core drilled in the 2 -1 Witbank Coalfield, Eastern Transvaal Coalfield and Vryheid Coalfield and analysed by means of X-ray diffraction in order to evaluate minerlogical variables as indicators of fluctuating palaeoenvironment conditions during the formation of the coal deposits. Clay assemblages dominate the mineralogical components of samples amongst the coals, and are even more abundant amongst the sediments in most cases. These assemblages display variations from kaolinite-free to kaolinite-dominated with subordinate mica and chlorite as well as minor traces of illite\smectite interstratification in the Witbank Coalfield. A similar distribution pattern is displayed in the Eastern Transvaal Coalfield, however, chlorite dominance in certain sections of the sequence is commonly associated with the carbonate minerals, and the illite\smectite interstratification contains up to 80% illite in some cases. The clay fraction in the Vryheid Coalfield is dominated by chlorite and mica with a low amount of illite\smectite interstratification (Buhrnann and Buhrnann, 1988). The relationship between clay and non-clay fractions was examined in terms of the presence and absence of kaolinite. K-feldspar is more abundant in kaolinite dominant samples while plagioclase proportions are higher in kaolinite-free samples. Siderite is more prevalent in kaolinitic samples. Apatite is associated with 2:1 layer silicates which are indicative of marine environments while crandallite is restricted to kaolinite dominant samples. There is no direct association between pyrite and any clay minerals; however the presence of pyrite does suggest marine influence or a reducing environment. Mica and chlorite are both regarded as detrital components which were formed under conditions of low chemical weathering resulting in the absence of kaolinite where a marine water environment was present. The presence of freshwater aids the transformation of illite, chlorite and smectite to kaolinite (Buhrnann and Buhmann, 1988). As shown by Buhrnann and Buhrnann the use of prevailing mineral assemblages could serve as a dependable indicator as to what depositional conditions were. 2 -2 Another study that provides reasonable information on the mineralogy and geochemistry of the Karoo sediments was conducted by Azzie (2002) using both XRF and XRD techniques. It was found that the sediments consist predominantly of the two oxides Si02 and A1203. The sandstones (including the glauconitic layers) have between 41 and 87 wt% Si02, while the shales and siltstones have between 27 and 61 wt% Si02. AI203 was highest in the siltstones and shales (9 - 23 wt%) followed by the sandstones (5 - 24 wt%). Fe203, CaO, MgO, Na20 and K20 are present in smaller concentrations than Si02 and A1203,while P205, MnO and Cl were barely present in any of the rocks. From XRD interpretations Azzie deduced that kaolinite and quartz are the main mineral constituents in all rock samples, while feldspars occur in major to minor proportions. Illite and siderite were present in major to minor amounts while pyrite, calcite and dolomite were present in minor to trace proportions in the shales and siltstones. A comparison of available data on the Karoo coal-bearing successions with other coal-bearing successions in Australia and U. S. A. show that the sandstones, shales and siltstones in the Karoo Supergroup are reasonably similar in composition to those in other countries, despite differences in age and depositional environment. Documented information on the geochemistry of coal-bearing strata is published by Nicholls (1968), and Styan and Bustin (1984), and includes a range of varying conditions under which coal-bearing strata have been deposited. However, extensive mineralogical information on the Karoo strata is still necessary and substantial information could be provided in this study. 2.2 Review of mineral matter in coal Extensive research studies and projects have been conducted on coal universally, and even more so on the complexity of it's constituents. Such detailed studies on the mineralogy and geochemistry of coal have been carried out in abundance in countries such as Australia, Canada, India, Pakistan and USA, amongst others. However, the same is not true for the numerous deposits located in South Africa. On very few occasions has coal mineralogy and geochemistry been investigated in further detail by well known researchers in the field. Thus, aspects characterising 2 -3 coal minerals in other deposits of different age, depositional environment and source areas has relevance to understanding minerals in South African coal deposits. Although much is gained from petrographical or chemical studies of the organic constituents, the mineral matter in coal also provides information on the depositional conditions and geological history of the coal-bearing sequences and individual coal beds (Ward, 2002). The composition of can could be divided into organic constituents, inorganic constituents, and fluid constituents in the organic and inorganic matter. Non- crystalline organic matter consists of lithotypes and macerals, and amorphous phases, while crystalline organic matter such as the hartite-evenkite group is also present. Crystalline or mineral inorganic matter comprises of crystals, grains and aggregates of different minerals, and, metamict and gel minerals. Volcanic and cosmic materials would form part of the amorphous or non-crystalline inorganic matter. Liquid and gas phases occur in minerals together with fluid inclusions to form the fluid constituents of coal (Vassilev and Vassileva, 1996). The crystalline inorganic matter occurring in coal may form as a result of a range of different processes. These include input of sediment into the original peat-forming environment by epiclastic and pyroclastic processes, accumulation of skeletal particles and other biogenic components within the peat deposit, and precipitation of material in the peat swamp or in the pores of the peat bed. The minerals are often visible in hand specimen, and can frequently be observed during examination of drili- cores, outcrops or mine exposures. Such megascopic occurrence include thick bands or lenticles of clay-rich or pyritic material, rounded pellets or nodules of mineral matter and dispersed crystals of mineral matter within the coal, as well as minerals that forms coatings on, or infillings in, cleats and other fractures. Microscopic data reveal that many of the minerals in coal occur in a very intimate association with organic constituents. Minerals may therefore also occur as isolated euhedral crystals, as broken, presumably detrital fragments, as microscopic nodules, or in some cases as sub-microscopic crystalline 2 -4 aggregates or framboids. Many minerals, however, occur as petrifactions, representing infillings of cell cavities in the individual coal macerals (Ward, 1986). Various coal samples contain similar assemblages of major and minor minerals. There is, however, comprehensible distinctions concerning modes of occurrence and the genesis of these minerals. So too is the understanding of certain terms such as epigenetic and syngenetic of the utmost importance. Syngenetic minerals in this case would refer to minerals that have formed contemporaneously with, and by essentially the same processes as the enclosing sediment. Epigenetic minerals occur after the deposition of the sediment. In understanding the genesis of minerals in coal the terms detrital and authigenic are also significant. Detrital minerals results from the mechanical disintegration of the parent rock and commonly occurs as a result of syngenetic processes forming sedimentary rocks, while authigenic minerals are formed or generated in place and have not been transported. These minerals therefore commonly occur due to epigenetic processes that may take place after deposition (Bates and Jackson, 1980). Although the amount of inorganic matter varies considerably, the major minerals in the crystalline matter of coal are normally quartz, kaolinite, illite, calcite, pyrite, plagioclase, K-feldspar, and occasionally gypsum, Fe-oxyhydroxides, sulphates, dolomite, ankerite and siderite. These minerals will be discussed with regard to their abundance and mode of occurrence in coalfields across the world and in South Africa. 2.2.1 Quartz Quartz is the most common mineral in coal and is both detrital and authigenic in origin. It is found as pore infillings in the organic matter in coal, a mode of occurrence that clearly indicates it's authigenic origin. Epigenetic quartz is massive or is present as bipyramidal crystals (Vassilev and Vassileva, 1996). Such crystals might have a volcanic origin or could have been precipitated authigenically. Occurrences where quartz has filled the cells of plant tissues at the early stage of development have been observed; however, according to Ward (2002) the origin of this silica is 2 -5 uncertain. However, a large proportion of silica in modern-day peats is of biogenic origin (Ward, 1986). The introduction of silica by hydrothermal solutions results in the quartz filling cracks, forming lenses and encrusting coal fragments. It may constitute up to half of the mineral matter in Australian coals (Ward, 1986), but makes up only 10% of the oxidation residues. This percentage may vary considerably depending on the depositional setting. Coals from the Gunnedah Basin in New South Wales, Australia contain relatively low amounts of quartz of detrital origin as observed by Ward et al. (1999). Similarly, Ward et al. (2001b) also noticed that quartz formed a major part of the mineral matter of coal seams in the Gloucester Basin with significantly elevated amounts (>40%) of this mineral in the lower seams of the basin, which in this case may represent contamination of the original peat by quartz-rich tuffaceous sediment. Electronic low-temperature (oxygen-plasma) ashing of some reference materials from the North American Argonne Premium coal series showed that quartz made up approximately 7 to 20% of the LTA residues. However, the mineral was more abundant in ash prepared at 370°C (Ward et a/., 2001a). Thus, the significance of this detrital and/or authigenic mineral is apparent, despite the difference in age and depositional environment between northern hemisphere and southern hemisphere coals. Furthermore, numerous authors such as Mackowsky (1968), Bouska (1981) and Ward (1984) have observed and confirmed the presence and modes of occurrence of quartz in coal. 2.2.2 Clay minerals, feldspars and micas Clay minerals present in coal are mainly kaolinite, subordinate illite and minor amounts of montmorillonite. In most cases, kaolinite makes up almost all the mineral matter along with quartz. It may occur in the pores and cell cavities of the coal macerals or as layers, lenses and lenticles. Authigenic kaolinite is a result of diagenetic alteration of illite, montmorillonite, feldspars, muscovite, other alumino- silicates, and pyroclastic glasses. Some clay minerals which occur as vein lets or crusts and fine films on slicken-side surfaces in coal, may have an epigenetic origin. 2 -6 There are various theories concerning the origin of kaolinite as suggested by Ward (1986). Occurrences where kaolinite has been sourced from volcanic material input to the original peat deposit has been observed (Ward, 2002), however, AI203 is soluble under low pH conditions and can thus be leached from any detrital mineral material and transported to areas with higher pH where it is authigenically precipitated (Vassilev and Vassileva, 1996). This precipitation leads to the formation of various minerals such as bauxite-group minerals, depending on the precipitation conditions. The occurrence of quartz and kaolinite as the dominant mineral matter in coals is not uncommon. In some high rank coals the concentrations of illite, mica and chlorite can be higher than kaolinite probably as a result of decomposition of some pre-existing minerals (Vassilev and Vassileva, 1996). Although more commonly associated with the non-coal strata, illite is often completely absent as a discrete mineral constituent in coal samples (Ward, 1986). Not only the partings in coal, but also the overlying and underlying shales, contain more illite than kaolinite (Mackowsky, 1968). It occurs frequently in the form of mixed-layer or interstratified clay minerals. It's low concentration may simply reflect a low proportion of detrital input to the peat swamp, or indicate that the mineral in it's pure form is susceptible to alteration (Ward, 1986). It also occurs in reasonable proportions in ash residues of North American coals as studied by Ward (2001a) and it's mainly detrital presence in coals from Bulgaria, the United States, Australia, Japan, Canada, China and South Africa has been observed by Vassilev and Vassileva (1996). Although occurring is lesser percentages, montmorillonite and chlorite are also found in coals throughout the world, and represent one of the principle clay minerals in Australian bituminous coals, other than kaolinite. They are most likely to be of detrital origin (Ward, 1984, 1986; Vassilev and Vassileva, 1996). Feldspars are represented by K-feldspars and plagioclases as semi-rounded grains and prismatic crystals of detrital, or even pyroclastic origin (Ward, 1986). These minerals are common in non-coal strata, or at least in the coal bearing sequences. Mica is represented by muscovite and subordinate biotite. Muscovite and biotite may 2 -7 both be of detrital origin while muscovite may also be as a result of diagenetic weathering of feldspars (Vassilev and Vassileva, 1996). 2.2.3 Sulphides One of the major contributors to air and water pollution originating from coal mining operations is the group of sulphide minerals which commonly occur in coal and occasionally in coal-bearing sequences. It is therefore important to understand the mode of occurrence of sulphur in coal. The total sulphur in coal can be used as an environmental indicator of the original peat. High sulphur content is often associated with marine influence at the time of/or immediately after deposition. Higher concentrations of sulphur are usually found at interfaces that indicate a change of environment (i.e. fresh to brackish water). There are three major forms of sulphur identified in coals, namely organic, pyritic and sulphate sulphur (Mackowsky, 1968; Bouska, 1981; Ward and Gurba, 1998). Organic sulphur is part of the plant tissue and forms as the plant grows. It is chemically bound to the carbon molecules, but it is not as well established as inorganic sulphur. Syngenetic organic sulphur is derived primarily from original plant sulphur. Reduced hydrogen sulphide can also react to form organic sulphur compounds if iron is not readily available to form pyrite. The organic sulphur in coal is mainly attached to the side chains of the organic molecules in the form of (-SH) groups. With the increase in coalification and rank, the (-SH) content of the macerals decreases due to condensation. Low-sulphur coal contains mostly syngenetic organic sulphur (Ward and Gurba, 1998). Pyritic and sulphate sulphur forms are often referred to as inorganic sulphur. Sulphate sulphur is often formed by oxidation of the pyritic sulphur. Inorganic sulphur is introduced to the coal during and/or after peat accumulation and during coalification. Pyritic sulphur mainly occurs as pyrite and marcasite. Sulphur forms including galena, sphalerite and millerite have also been reported in some coal samples (Ward and Gurba, 1998). This type of sulphur can form syngenetically during peat formation as a result of microbial reduction of aqueous sulphate during 2 -8 early diagenesis. Bacterial reduction of sulphate takes place in a variety of sedimentary environments, both marine and freshwater, wherever organic matter and sulphate coexist in the absence of oxygen. Syngenetic pyrite is usually characterized by small, isolated crystallites and framboids (Vassilev and Vassileva, 1996). Epigenetic pyrite is usually observed as large crystals, massive forms with various overgrowths encompassing the previous overgrowths or as cleat- and fracture-filling pyrite. This secondary incorporation of sulphur is determined by the availability of sulphate, the reactivity of the organic matter, the extent of sulphate reduction and the availability of iron and other metals to form mineral sulphides. Some epigenetic occurrences may represent remobilisation of organic sulphur or syngenetic sulphides within the coal, while other may be the result of factors outside the original depositional system, such as nearby igneous intrusions, or caused by post- depositional fluid movement through the coal-bearing succession. Unlike most syngenetic pyrite, post-depositional sulphides are not necessarily an indication of marine influence on the formation of the coal seam (Spiker et al., 1994; Ward, 2002). Primary sulphate is formed by equilibration of sulphate molecules with water molecules and catalyzed by sulphate reducing bacteria early in diagenesis. Secondary sulphate is formed by late stage oxidation of sulphide (i.e. during weathering) by one of the following mechanisms: a) Utilizing O2 as an oxidizing agent S2- + 202 ~ sol (1) b) Utilizing Fe3+ or some other oxidizing agent in the absence of oxygen (2) The sulphide oxidation via reaction (2) is generally faster than via reaction (1), and is predominant under natural conditions. Generally coals show a wide variation of primary and secondary sulphate and very few coals are dominated by one source (McCarthy et al. 1998). 2 -9 2.2.4 Carbonates The carbonates of calcium, iron magnesium and manganese are some of the most obvious of the incombustible constituents since they occur as the common cleat infillings of coal seams (Williamson, 1967) and are mostly authigenic minerals in coals (Vassilev and Vassileva, 1996). These minerals are of both syngenetic and epigenetic origin. Syngenetic calcite, dolomite, and ankerite occur as individual grains, lenses or infilling cell pores. The latter minerals also occur as veiniets filling cavities of cementing of fractures coal fragments, suggesting an epigenetic origin. Larger, spheroidal to regular masses of syngenetic minerals, mainly calcite but also including siderite, dolomite, pyrite and quartz, occur in some seams as coal concretions. These mineral accumulations are regarded as representing concretions formed in the peat bed, either during plant deposition or after early diagenesis. Siderite occurrences include nodules with a typically radiating crystal structure and replacements of the maceral components. An abundance of syngenetic siderite is usually thought to indicate deposition of the coal mainly under non-marine conditions (Vassilev and Vassileva, 1996). Epigenetic carbonates, such as calcite, dolomite, ankerite, and siderite, are common cleat infilling materials in coal seams. In some cases the cleat fillings may show chemical variations such as those observed in some North American coals (Ward, 2002). Vassilev and Vassileva (1996), along with various authors, have observed the presence of other carbonates such as smithsonite, magnesite, rhodochrosite, and witherite, amongst others. 2.2.5 Phosphates Phosphate minerals in coal exist as minor to rare constituents of the mineral matter, but are still associated with coal deposits. They are detrital and authigenic in origin. Phosphorus in coal occurs mainly as inorganic phosphates and lesser amounts of organically bound phosphorus complexes. Sources of phosphorus may be in enriched volcanic material introduced during peat accumulation or the organic matter in the peat bed (Ward, 2002). 2 -10 A range of phosphate minerals can occur in coals, including apatite and the aluminophosphates of the crandallite group, which occur mainly as syngenetic cell and pore infillings, or as epigenetic cleat and fracture fillings due to the remobilisation of phosphate formed earlier within the coal seam. Crandallite-group minerals are composed of four principal elements, namely phosphorus, calcium, barium/strontium and aluminium. Crandallite occurs as 3J.lm size colloidal precipitates, as concretions and as porous aggregates as large as 100 urn (Rao and Walsh, 1999). Apatite occurs as prismatic crystals and occasionally in clusters. Occurrences of uranium phosphate, goyazite and vivianite, as well as the association between phosphorus and some rare earth elements have been observed (Vassilev and Vassileva, 1996). 2.2.6 Other minerals Although the spectrum of minerals occurring in coals has been reviewed in considerable detail, subsidiary amounts of less common minerals also occur in coals. Chlorite, which in some cases would be regarded as a significant constituent, occurs as an authigenic mineral together with other chlorides such as halite. Alumino-silicate volcanic glass has also been observed as spheres, spheroids and angular particles. The accessory minerals in coal show great variety, but their low concentrations create difficulty in determining some of them (Vassilev and Vassileva, 1996). 2.3 Mineral matter in South African coal Significant observations can be made by investigating the information on the distribution, occurrence and abundance of minerals in the coal deposits of the Karoo Supergroup which has been gathered up to date. A study by Gaigher (1980) deduced that the inorganic matter in some South African coals is dominated by clay minerals, mainly kaolinite and illite, followed by quartz and then the carbonates calcite, dolomite and siderite. Mineral matter is seen to vary over a range of 11% to 36% of a total sample. Gaigher observed that quartz contents are extremely variable. Samples taken in the centre of the Witbank No. 2 seam had the lowest quartz 2 -11 contents, while the Witbank No. 5 seam samples contained higher proportions of quartz (17% to 35% of mineral matter). Nearly all No. 2 seam samples contained dolomite and siderite in addition to calcite, while pyrite was present in all samples from the respective coalfields sampled in this study. The most important constituents of mineral matter in coal, which consists of the clay mineral fraction, are analysed in more detail. Samples from the Witbank coalfield No. 2 and 4 seam contained abundant kaolinite with only traces of illite and expandable clays such as illite-smectite and montmorillonite. Regular interstratified illite- montmorillonite dominates the clay fraction of the No. 5 seam samples (Gaigher, 1980). On average, the clay mineral composition of Witbank coal falls close to the composition field for Australian coals, but with somewhat less expandable clays. In the Witbank No. 2 seam, coal from the extremities of the coalfield are of slightly lower rank, containing kaolinite values as high as 88% compared to the 61% kaolinite from the central part of the coalfield. Similarly, Azzie (2002) found that the principle clay mineral present in coal samples from the Highveld area was kaolinite. It was not established whether mixtures of discrete montmorillonite and illite were present. Quartz was absent, or present in trace quantities in the coal units. Calcite and magnesite were dominant carbonate phases while pyrite was generally a minor constituent. Concentration of the phosphate apatite was highest in the coal samples, and very rare or absent in the sediments. Ankerite, microcline and anatase were also identified using XRD analysis. The occurrence of aragonite in carbonate lenses in coals from the Witbank area has been noted by Van der Spuyand Willis (1991). Although, aragonite has been observed in coals from other countries (Vassilev and Vassileva, 1996), the lack of this carbonate was emphasized by Van der Spuyand Willis. However, the XRD analyses of carbonate lenses from coal mines in the Witbank area indicated that aragonite is a major mineral phase in some of these assemblages. Seeing that the individual mineral concentration in coal is less than 5%, it is difficult to identify minerals in lower concentrations. Thus, after an examination of a diffraction scan 2 -12 Van der Spuyand Willis concluded that most of the strongest peaks of aragonite are obscured by, and appear as "shoulders" on either side of peaks of minerals such as quartz, kaolinite and pyrite, therefore the presence of aragonite in South African coals could be possible. According to Gaigher (1980) the chemical analyses of coal ash from South African coals show the residue to have features of hydrolysate sediment, modified by the element collecting activities of the plants and the low Eh - pH conditions. Si02, MgO, Na20 and K20 percentages were significantly low when compared to crustal averages, probably due to their solubility under humid conditions. The enrichment in AI203 and Ti02, with median values between 26% and 1.2% respectively, might also have been as a result of leaching and accumulation by plants. P205 has a varying concentration in coal from 0.05 to 4%. Similar average concentrations for AI203 and Ti02 where obtained by Azzie (2002), with significant correlation between Ti02 and quartz (rs=0.81) suggesting that to some degree they are complexed with the organic matter. Unlike in the Gaigher study, available analyses of sulphur and iron showed good agreement with each other (rs=0.76) and pyrite from Azzie's mineralogical interpretations. From analyses for calcium, magnesium and the carbonate minerals it was deduced that calcite was more abundant in the coal samples than dolomite; yet both do occur in the coals, and sometimes in substantial amounts that are well within the order of 10 to 40 wt% total the mineral composition. Insufficient data was available to indicate a correlation between Na20, K20 and CaO, and the feldspars in the coals. With regard to trace elements, Gaigher was unable to establish whether there are any major variations in certain trace element concentrations between the different coal fields. However, it was noted that the coal ash seemed to be enriched in tungsten, gallium, and sometimes strontium, with respect to the earth's crust. Azzie has thus contributed considerably to knowledge on the association between major and trace elements, and various mineral constituents in coal. Good correlation between Nb and quartz (rs=0.75), and between Ti02 and Nb, Zr, Th, Sc, Y and Cu was observed, however, no explanation could be presented for this association. 2 -13 Although no phosphate minerals were identified, a significant correlation exists between Sr and Ca, but not for Sr and calcite and dolomite. A similar scenario exists for Ba which showed weak correlations with the oxides and the minerals. Rb has a strong correlation with K20 in coals (rs=O.93), suggesting that Rb is related to Kitself and not any particular mineral component. The only significant correlation regarding Zr was with quartz. Zr concentrations are usually higher in felsic rocks and so too in granite. It may be indicative of the influence of igneous material. Concentrations of this element do not exceed 300ppm in coals. The very brief background regarding mineralogical research on South African coals suggests that more could be done to increase our knowledge of our coal deposits. Information gained by the objectives of this study will hopefully contribute to our understanding of the mineralogical composition of coal deposits of the Witbank and Highveld Coalfields. 2 -14 CHAPTER 3 GEOCHEMISTRY AND MINERALOGY OF THE COAL AND COAL- BEARING SUCCESSIONS 3.1 Experimental analytical methods used in coal mineralogical analyses Researchers in coal mineralogy and geochemistry have encountered continuous difficulties with analytical procedures. In order to improve the accuracy with which analytical techniques are performed, and the correctness of results, various experimental methods have come to pass. The need for such improvements in coal analyses has it's origin in the fact that mineral matter in coal constitutes only about 10-30 wt% of a sample. The excessive amounts of organic matter tend to obscure results in various ways, and the low concentrations of inorganic matter contribute to difficulties in analyses. However, not all experimental methods prove to be precise, and an expected degree of error accompanies most results. A look at such techniques would emphasize the importance of accuracy and care during analytical procedures. The main objectives of some experiments are to separate mineral matter from organic matter in coal, and there are a few ways through which this can be done. Many researchers make use of chemical treatment in order to isolate the mineral matter. This method is more cost efficient compared to acquiring analytical instruments such as oxygen-plasma ashers which will be discussed later. Ward (1974) addressed the problem by suggesting a chemical treatment of small amounts of coal with hot (8S0C), concentrated hydrogen peroxide. Approximately 100ml of hydrogen peroxide is added to 1g of pulverised coal and the mixture is left to oxidise for a few days. The coal changes to a grey-brown or white residue when the reaction is complete. Once the process was complete, the residue was then separated in a centrifuge and dried. Drying was carried out in the laboratory to avoid dehydration and structural changes in the clay minerals. With X-ray diffraction of this residue it was possible to identify quartz and kaolinite in most cases. Phosphate 3 -1 minerals and calcium oxalate minerals were also observed. The technique proved to be a low-cost technique for isolating insoluble mineral matter, but it has limitations. The reactions that take place with the hydrogen peroxide, depending on the constituents of the coal, could be spontaneous and are dangerous to handle. Even though chlorides are not abundant in coals, the organic acids may attack both chlorides and carbonate where present. Kunze and Dixon (1986) proposed an almost identical technique for the removal of organic matter, and once again the same limitation concerning the susceptibility of carbonates is emphasized. O'Shay et al. (1990) used hydrogen peroxide to determine the potential acidity in the pyritic overburden developed in mining areas. The oxidation of iron disulphides, such a pyrite and marcasite from mine spoils produces this acidity problem. To prevent excessive acidity problems from occurring on the spoil surface, or to correct acidity problems that may have occurred after levelling the spoil, a rapid, accurate, and reproducible potential acidity technique was required. The original and modified acidity potential methods were applied to samples from a mine spoil. Samples were pre-treated with CaCb to remove residual acid, then oxidised with H202. Potential acidity values obtained from samples using the modified method were compared with potential acidity values from the original method. The modified method proved to be accurate and less variable in comparison to the original potential acidity method. Chemical treatment prior to mineral matter identification in some Pakistani coals was carried out by Khan et al. (2002). Extractions were made separately with ammonium acetate, HCI, HN03 and HF+HCI solutions, as well as an acid mixture consisting of H20, HN03, HCI and HF. The extraction residues and virgin coals were ashed at 7S0°C. Cu, Mn, Zn, Fe, Ca, Mg, Na and K were determined using various methods. According to Khan et al. (2002) complete demineralization of coal requires successive treatments with various acids. Prolonged soaking followed by extraction is recommended to compensate for complex porosity and vesicular channels in coal. Lithophillic elements like Fe, Ca, Mg and K can be effectively extracted compared to chalcophillic elements like Cu and Zn with all the aforementioned extracts. 3 -2 In most instances the amount of material which can be accommodated during one analysis is minute, making it difficult to accommodate larger samples. Furthermore, working with chemicals requires extreme cautiousness and procedures might take up to weeks, thus rather time consuming when working with many samples. Therefore, techniques such as normative interpretation of ash analysis data and low- temperature ashing may be a commendable alternative. Normative interpretations are based on the chemical composition of the coal's high- temperature ash. Such techniques would assume that the various elements in the ash were originally partitioned between particular minerals, and hence represent an attempt to derive a "theoretical" mineralogy from the chemical analysis data. They are most effective if the actual minerals present are known from independent evidence, such as X-ray diffraction (Ward, 1999). One of the most established methods of isolating mineral matter in coals without major alteration is through low-temperature oxygen-plasma ashing. This technique is described thoroughly by Gluskoter (1965). Oxygen is passed through a high-energy electromagnetic field produced by a radio-frequency oscillator. An electrodeless ring discharge takes place in the gas, and activated oxygen is produced. The activated gas is a mixture of atomic and ionic species as well as in vibrationally excited states. The activated oxygen passes over the sample which is placed in a Pyrex boat 5cm below the radio-frequency field until the organic matter is decomposed. The actual ashing temperature appears to lie between 150° and 200°C. A light-coloured dry mineral residue remains when the oxidation process is complete (Gluskoter, 1965; Ward, 1986). This technique probably represents the most reliable method for determining the percentage of total mineral matter in coal (Ward, 1999). 3.1.1 Experimental procedures followed during this study An attempt was made to isolate the mineral matter of the coal used in this study for XRD analyses. Although chemical treatment before analysis was considered, the technique presented numerous difficulties and limitations with regard to the facilities available and the enormous amount of samples which where to be analysed. 3 -3 It was therefore decided to make use of a muffle furnace to oxidise a few samples. Small amounts of material were placed in porcelain holders, and left in a muffle furnace first for 50 hours at 350°C, then for 60 hours at 250°C, and lastly for 70 hours at 150°C. According to Kruger (1981) an ashing temperature of 350°C is optimum as ashing at temperatures higher than this might give rise to changes in the mineralogical composition, while the process will take place exceptionally slower at lower temperatures. As seen from Tables 3-1 to 3-3, the percentage weight loss decreases as the temperature is lowered, even though the heating period is increased. However, to draw a reasonable conclusion from this experiment the behaviour of the minerals in coal during ignition must be understood. As mentioned before, the assemblage encountered in the coal consists primarily of quartz, kaolinite, montmorillonite, illite and mixed-layer clays, pyrite, calcite, dolomite and siderite, and possibly feldspars, micas, phosphates and chlorides. From literature it is apparent that most of the mineral groups mentioned should not undergo transformation due to a temperature increase up to 350°C (Ribbe, 1974; Vaughan and Craig, 1978; Kruger, 1981; Reeder, 1983; Nriagu and Moore, 1984) . However, results obtained in this experiment prove that normal ashing in a muffle furnace can bring about phase changes, depending on the circumstances during the procedure and the mineral assemblage involved. Weight loss in the initial stages would be accredited primarily to the loss of H20. Due to the combustion of organic matter at higher temperatures oxidation would commence. The X-ray diffraction patterns of each sample prior to and after heating and the virgin coal are illustrated in Appendix 2. Figure A2-7 illustrates the XRD patterns of sample LU1. The pattern remains similar despite an increase in temperature, with background interference peaks more subtle and the appearance of the strongest peaks of calcite and dolomite, which are especially noticeable in the sample that has been heated to 350°C. From the percentage weight loss at 350°C it is clear that there is a reasonable amount of inorganic matter present in this sample as minor phases become detectable even 3 -4 though more than half of the material has been volatilised. However, as noted by Kruger (1981), it is also clear that combustion at lower temperatures has almost no effect on the sample even though the duration of combustion was lengthened, as observed in Table 3-3. Table 3-1: Results after heating for 50 hours at 350°C (units in grams) *Sample **Crucible C&S(before) S(before) C&S(after) S(after) S wt loss % wt loss LU1 20.10 30.10 10.00 23.80 3.70 6.30 63.00 LU24 18.60 28.50 9.90 19.40 0.80 9.10 91.92 *S - Sample; **C - Crucible Sample LU24 was rich in organic material as observed in the percentage weight loss both at 350°C and 250°C as seen in Tables 3-1 and 3-2, respectively. The XRD patterns for this sample are illustrated in Figure A2-8. Problems with the ashing technique emerged especially with the combustion of this sample. Although a large volume of the organic material could be removed successfully, mineral phases remaining in the ash had undergone alteration at 350°C. As seen from XRD patterns, in the small amount of ash remaining, a reasonable amount of phases are present. X-ray diffraction of the coal produced an inadequate pattern in terms of the manual interpretation method applied. The visibility of the peaks on the diffraction patterns improve as the temperature is raised, and only at 250°C are some minute peaks detected. At 350°C the major mineral phases are prominent; however, the occurrence of specific minerals in coals is not necessarily as a result of reactions that has taken place in natural systems, but could be due to reactions taking place in the furnace. Calcite is dominant throughout the experiments at all temperatures, while kaolinite, anhydrite, dolomite, and hematite only appear at 350°C. Kaolinite is also the dominant clay mineral in most coals and is therefore expected to be present; so too has dolomite been observed together with calcite in South African coals. The phases which pose a problem are anhydrite and hematite. Anhydrite is a calcium-sulphate and hematite is an iron- oxide mineral. 3 -5 These phases were not observed in studies by Gaigher (1980), Azzie (2002) or BOhmann and Buhrnann (1988), thus their occurrence could have an alternative origin. Pyrite and calcite which often co-exist in the same assemblage are both thought to be stable under temperatures as those used in the experiment. However, it appears that these minerals were altered during the combustion process. The oxidation of pyrite results in the formation of hematite and a loss in sulphur as S03. Calcite decomposes to CaO and CO2 during combustion. Therefore, it is possible for the S03 from pyrite and the CaO from calcite to react to form CaS04, anhydrite. Ward et al. (2001 a) noted similar occurrences in a study involving the low- temperature ashing and ashing in a muffle furnace. Minerals such as kaolinite and pyrite were significantly lower in the ash prepared in a muffle furnace at 370°C. The same minerals were more abundant in the low-temperature ash, confirming the alteration of constituents which could possibly take place in a muffle furnace. The oxidation of pyrite is not uncommon in the presence of oxygen, thus the formation of hematite can be explained. Furthermore, this sulphur was available to combine with the calcium from the calcite to form anhydrite. Table 3-2: Results after heating for 60 hours at 250°C (units in grams) Sample Crucible C&S(before) S(before) C&S(after} S(after) S wt loss % wt loss LU1 20.40 30.50 10.10 29.80 9.40 0.70 6.93 LU24 32.00 40.20 8.20 36.40 4.40 3.80 46.34 Table 3-3: Results after heating for 70 hours at 150°C (units in grams) Sample Crucible C&S(before) S(before) C&S(after) S(after) S wt loss % wt loss LU1 20.00 30.20 10.20 29.70 9.70 0.50 4.90 LU24 22.70 26.20 3.50 26.10 3.40 0.10 2.86 After ashing a few more samples it was decided that the process has an adverse effect on the original mineralogy which is of utmost importance. Researchers in the field such as Dr. James Willis (personal communication, 2003) from the University of Cape Town, South Africa believes that unwanted transformations may take place in a furnace involving sulphur and even phosphorus. Although the formation of anhydrite and hematite could form due to natural processes as well, the experimentally induced transformation of mineral phases, which should be avoided at all costs, seems more likely. 3 -6 Ashing at lower temperatures was time-consuming for the amount of samples involved and produced poor results as is evident from the experiments, while ashing at higher temperatures brought about unnecessary changes in the samples. Prof. Colin Ward from the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia kindly agreed to ash ten coal samples and analyse them using X-ray diffraction together with Siroquant™ interactive interpretation software, as well as X-ray fluorescence. According to Ward (1999), oxidising the organic matter and isolating the minerals without major alteration can be achieved successfully with low-temperature oxygen- plasma ashing. Figures A2-9 to A2-12 in Appendix 2 illustrates the difference in peak visibility before and after the samples were subjected to low-temperature ashing. Figure A2-9 depicts the unashed XRD pattern of sample M-20. The dominant minerals, namely, quartz, kaolinite and pyrite are visible, however, the pattern is slightly obscure due to high backgrounds which in this case are caused by the organic material in the coal. A similar pattern is obtained from the X-ray diffraction of the unashed KOR-10 sample as illustrated in Figure A2-11. Kaolinite along with minor calcite and dolomite made up the mineralogy. The Siroquant™ software allows the proportions of up to 25 different minerals in a mixture to be quantified from a conventional X-ray powder diffractometry pattern using Rietveld techniques. Rietveld (1969) developed a formula to give the intensity at any point in the scan of a single mineral, with information on how to refine relevant crystal structure and instrumental parameters by least-squares analysis of the profile. Siroquant calculates a theoretical XRD profile and fits it to the measured pattern by full-matrix least-squares refinement of the following Rietveld parameters: phase scales, line asymmetry, phase preferred orientation, phase line widths, instrument zero, the line shape parameter for each phase, and the phase unit cell dimensions. A calculated XRD pattern of each mineral could be generated from it's known crystal structure, and the sum of all calculated patterns can be fitted to the observed XRD pattern of a multi-mineral sample by least squares analysis to find the optimum individual phase scales. These are then used to determine the mineral percentages. 3 -7 The parameters can be adjusted simply and interactively with the program, to replicate more closely the mineral's contribution to the measured pattern and allow for variation due to atomic substitution, layer disordering, preferred orientation, and other factors in the standard pattern used. Crystallographic and chemical data as well as reference patterns can be developed for use in Siroquant™ directly from measured XRD patterns of a specific mineral, allowing minerals with poorly developed crystal structures to be incorporated in the analysis (Ward et aI., 2001 a). Figures A2-10 and A2-12 illustrate the X-ray diffraction patterns of samples M- 20 and KOR-10 respectively. The peaks of the patterns are noticeably distinguishable compared to those in the unashed patterns. Results from the Siroquant™ interpretation shows that sample M-20 consists of 21.5% quartz, 51.5% kaolinite, 12.2% illite, 3.9% mixed layer clays and 11.0% pyrite, while sample KOR-10 consists of 0.2% quartz, 78.4% kaolinite, 4.6% illite, 1.6% pyrite, 3.7% calcite, 10.3% dolomite and 1.3% bassanite. In the latter case, the bassanite is thought to represent artefacts of the plasma ashing process, formed when organically associated Ca or Ca from calcite, and in some cases Na, combines with organic sulphur released during the oxidation of organic matter (Ward et aI., 2001 a). The use of LTA to isolate mineral matter is effective despite minor occurrences of artefacts such as bassanite. The oxidation of sulphides such as pyrite was also avoided, causing the original mineralogy to remain unaltered. Secondly, the detection of poorly crystalline and rare minerals such as illite and mixed-layer clays is made easier with the help of the Siroquant™ software. The X-ray fluorescence data concerning these ten samples is in good agreement with the Siroquant interpretation and the interpretation technique applied at UFS. There are numerous techniques used for determining the chemical composition of a rock sample, X-ray fluorescence being reliable for various applications. The ten samples ashed at UNSW were also analysed by UFS using standard XRF procedures in order to determine the variations in whole coal XRF analysis and fused disk XRF analysis. As proposed by Dr. Willis from UCT, whole coal XRF analyses for major and trace elements regarding coal samples are more accurate, 3 -8 since no unwanted changes are brought about, as is the case when heating and fusing samples. A brief explanation of the sample preparation procedures will highlight distinct differences in total chemical composition and mineral disintegration temperatures. The standard procedure followed at UFS involves drying the samples at 11OOG for 24 hours to determine the H20 content, then heating them to 9800G to obtain the LOL The problem with applying this method was that a percentage of carbonate minerals and other phases were not completely disintegrated. Thus, during the preparation of the fusion disk any G02 still left will be lost, leaving less of the ash originally weighed off to prepare the disk and resulting in lower totals. Samples were subsequently heated to 10500G and 10800G to ensure complete decomposition of all phases. Results for the 10500G and 10800G ash are found in Tables 3-4 to 3-7. This rise in temperature resulted in an increase in the LOL Results obtained for the 10500G and 10800G ash are very similar, since each sample was individually calcined for 5 hours. Table 3-4: UFS XRF data -1050°C ash nple Si02 Ti02 AI203 Fe203 MnO MgO CaO Na20 K20 P20S H2O- LOl Total 1-5 11.11 0.36 8.47 0.34 0.02 1.28 2.85 0.06 0.31 0.29 3.06 73.66 101.81 U37 12.65 0.28 6.71 0.14 0.01 0.37 1.49 0.00 0.08 0.01 1.25 79.67 102.66 U10 7.71 0.36 7.00 1.27 0.02 1.34 3.54 0.00 0.06 0.06 3.29 74.36 99.01 R10 13.19 0.56 12.03 0.40 0.02 0.77 2.18 0.01 0.11 0.06 2.49 70.43 102.25 K1 4.90 0.13 2.88 7.86 0.07 0.98 3.27 0.01 0.02 0.01 3.30 78.76 102.19 13 9.44 0.19 5.17 0.12 0.01 0.22 0.82 0.00 0.08 0.00 3.64 81.31 101.00 20 13.00 0.28 5.30 6.11 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.00 0.26 0.01 0.95 77.30 103.29 !T12 16.06 0.70 7.92 0.17 0.00 0.03 0.06 0.00 0.10 0.04 3.11 74.61 102.80 ~M 14.53 0.42 11.28 0.60 0.01 0.33 2.72 0.00 0.13 1.69 2.47 69.05 103.23 Table 3-5: UFS XRF data - 10500C ash - normalised LOl and H20 free Sample Si02 Ti02 AI203 Fe203 MnO MgO CaO Na20 K20 P20S Total BH1-5 44.28 1.43 33.76 1.36 0.08 5.10 11.36 0.24 1.24 1.16 100.00 DOU37 58.19 1.29 30.86 0.64 0.05 1.70 6.85 0.00 0.37 0.05 100.00 KHU10 36.10 1.69 32.77 5.95 0.09 6.27 16.57 0.00 0.28 0.28 100.00 KOR10 44.97 1.91 41.02 1.36 0.07 2.63 7.43 0.03 0.38 0.20 100.00 LK1 24.34 0.65 14.31 39.05 0.35 4.87 16.24 0.05 0.10 0.05 100.00 LU13 58.82 1.18 32.21 0.75 0.06 1.37 5.11 0.00 0.50 0.00 100.00 M20 51.92 1.12 21.17 24.40 0.00 0.12 0.20 0.00 1.04 0.04 100.00 OPT12 64.04 2.79 31.58 0.68 0.00 0.12 0.24 0.00 0.40 0.16 100.00 R2M 45.82 1.32 35.57 1.89 0.03 1.04 8.58 0.00 0.41 5.33 100.00 3 -9 Table 3-6: UFS XRF data -1080°C ash AI203 MnO MgO CaO LOl Total -n-s 10.06 0.32 7.61 0.29 0.01 1.17 2.59 0.06 0.29 0.26 2.75 76.05 101.46 >U37 12.95 0.29 6.85 0.14 0.01 0.37 1.51 0.00 0.08 0.01 1.10 78.93 102.24 U10 8.07 0.39 7.36 1.31 0.02 1.41 3.75 0.00 0.07 0.07 3.32 74.99 100.76 R10 13.04 0.55 11.99 0.44 0.02 0.76 2.12 0.01 0.11 0.06 2.48 70.61 102.19 K1 5.12 0.13 2.97 7.79 0.07 1.02 3.38 0.01 0.01 0.01 3.09 78.82 102.42 ~13 10.87 0.22 6.02 0.12 0.01 0.25 0.95 0.00 0.09 0.00 3.46 80.49 102.48 20 13.38 0.28 5.46 6.29 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.00 0.27 0.01 0.90 74.66 101.33 T12 15.71 0.69 7.79 0.16 0.00 0.02 0.06 0.00 0.10 0.04 2.93 72.87 100.37 2M 12.22 0.35 9.28 0.52 0.01 0.25 2.29 0.00 0.10 1.40 2.34 72.44 101.20 The procedure followed in preparation for whole coal XRF analysis involves making a pressed powder briquette using Hoechst Wax. The method is described in Appendix 1 and results for the whole coal XRF are found in Tables 3-8 and 3-9. Sulphur was determined using powder briquettes, seeing that all or at least most sulphur is lost during the ashing process. The results are normalised to a LOl, H20 and S-free basis to ensure consistent comparison of the data. Table 3-7: UFS XRF data - 10800C ash - normalised LOl and H20 free Sample AI203 MnO MgO CaO Total BH1-S 44.40 1.41 33.58 1.28 0.04 5.16 11.43 0.26 1.28 1.15 100.00 DOU37 58.31 1.31 30.84 0.63 0.05 1.67 6.80 0.00 0.36 0.05 100.00 KHU10 35.95 1.74 32.78 5.84 0.09 6.28 16.70 0.00 0.31 0.31 100.00 KOR10 44.81 1.89 41.20 1.51 0.07 2.61 7.29 0.03 0.38 0.21 100.00 LK1 24.96 0.63 14.48 37.98 0.34 4.97 16.48 0.05 0.05 0.05 100.00 LU13 58.66 1.19 32.49 0.65 0.05 1.35 5.13 0.00 0.49 0.00 100.00 M20 51.92 1.09 21.19 24.41 0.00 0.12 0.19 0.00 1.05 0.04 100.00 OPT12 63.94 2.81 31.71 0.65 0.00 0.08 0.24 0.00 0.41 0.16 100.00 R2M 46.25 1.32 35.12 1.97 0.04 0.95 8.67 0.00 0.38 5.30 100.00 3 -10 Table 3-8: UFS XRF data - Whole coal analyses MgO CaO S LOl Total Hl-5 6.30 0.31 4.78 0.25 0.39 2.34 0.25 0.35 0.31 0.80 3.06 82.66 101.80 )U37 7.99 0.27 3.91 0.12 0.09 1.25 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.63 1.25 84.67 100.25 UlO 4.73 0.44 5.12 0.71 0.63 3.95 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.67 3.29 78.36 98.04 )Rl0 7.48 0.55 6.63 0.28 0.34 1.93 0.02 0.11 0.07 0.38 2.49 81.43 101.71 Kl 2.11 0.08 2.17 7.51 0.40 3.25 0.04 0.00 0.00 1.44 3.30 78.76 99.06 ~13 4.32 0.14 2.76 0.08 0.04 0.67 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.55 3.64 87.31 99.59 ~20 7.59 0.21 3.19 4.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.01 2.89 0.95 80.30 100.05 ~T12 11.01 0.78 4.51 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.04 0.62 3.11 79.61 99.91 2M 7.35 0.33 5.92 0.36 0.07 1.87 0.00 0.10 1.40 0.40 2.47 78.05 98.32 Table 3-9: UFS XRF data - Whole coal analyses - normalised LOl, H20 and S free Sample CaO Total BHl-5 41.23 2.03 31.28 1.64 2.55 15.31 1.64 2.29 2.03 100.00 DOU37 58.32 1.97 28.54 0.88 0.66 9.12 0.00 0.51 0.00 100.00 KHU10 30.09 2.80 32.57 4.52 4.01 25.13 0.00 0.45 0.45 100.00 KOR10 42.96 3.16 38.08 1.61 1.95 11.09 0.11 0.63 0.40 100.00 LKl 13.56 0.51 13.95 48.26 2.57 20.89 0.26 0.00 0.00 100.00 LU13 53.43 1.73 34.13 0.99 0.49 8.29 0.07 0.87 0.00 100.00 M20 47.71 1.32 20.05 29.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.45 0.06 100.00 OPT12 66.45 4.71 27.22 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.24 100.00 R2M 42.24 1.90 34.02 2.07 0.40 10.75 0.00 0.57 8.05 100.00 As for some examples concerning correlations between these analyses, Figures 3.1 to 3.4 illustrates oxide correlations for Fe203, Si02, AI203 and CaD. I 80,-------------------------------------, P 60 .oolO.. R' = 0.9969 ë';.f.l 40 Cl) IJ.. CJ) ~ 20 • O~----------------~------~----~--~ o 10 20 30 40 50 60 I Figure 3.1 - Relationship between Whole coal Fe203% and UFS Fe203% at 10500C 3 -11 ~------ - -- --- -- - ------ 80 ,--------------------~ R2 = 0.9804 P 60 o I o.I.),. ;,e 40 ecn5 (/) ~ 20 o ~----,_--------------~ o 20 40 60 80 Whole coal S102% Figure 3.2 - Relationship between Whole coal Si02% and UFS Si02% at 10S0°C Good correlations were noted in comparisons between the whole coal results and the 1050°C and 10800C ash analyses as depicted in Figures 3.1 to 3.4. Some of the correlations, albeit good correlations, still show differences between the actual concentrations of whole coal and fusion disk results. 50r--------------------, ~ = O.9_4?_5_ _ • • 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Figure 3.3 - Relationship between Whole coal A1 0203% and UFS A1203% at 1080 C 3 -12 CaO 20~----------------------------------~ ~ 15 -- - --- o oco...,.. o?ft. 10 «I CJ I/) LJ.. ::l 5- L 5 10 15 20 250_0 Whole coal CaO"lo ~J Figure 3.4 - Relationship between Whole coal CaO% and UFS CaO% at 10S0oC As observed in tables 3-4 to 3-9, whole coal oxide concentrations are higher than the fusion disk oxide concentrations for the 1050°C and 1080°C ash. A possible reason for this phenomenon is the loss of inorganic material along with the organic matter during the ashing process. For the determination of the LOl, the samples are placed in a furnace at a high temperature leading to combustion during which large quantities of carbon are released (some as soot). This results in lower concentrations in the fusion disk analyses. If all phases are not completely decomposed at the end of the ashing process, some of the volatile constituents in the sample will be lost when the disk is fused. This affects the totals of the fusion disk analysis which should be lower than the powder briquette results. La203 is added to the fusion disks to account for mass absorption. The infinite thickness of a powder briquette is extremely important, and therefore thicker briquettes are prepared to avoid X-rays from passing through them (Appendix 1). To ascertain the effect of mass absorption, the linearity of curves were tested by analysing mixtures of samples LK 1 and LU13. Table 3-10 contains XRF results on whole coal samples for mixtures of samples LK1 and LU13, as well as the pure end members of these samples. The proportions of these samples were mixed in a Turbula mixer for 30 minutes and subsequently analysed. The "Cal." column represents the values that should be obtained when a 3 -13 proportion of one sample is mixed with a proportion of the other. The oxide name represents the values analysed for each sample, and the "Diff." column represents the difference between the calculated and the analysed values for each sample. The sample names are according to the proportion of the sample in the mixture e.g. LK75LU25 represents 75% of sample LK1 and 25% of sample LU13. Calculated values for LOl and H20 (from the end members) were used since no LOl and H20 was determined for these mixtures. Results for oxides that occur in low concentrations such as Ti02, MgO, Na20, K20, P20S, S and CaO were close to the calculated results. Results for Si02, AI203 and Fe203 differed slightly from the calculated values (Table 3-10). Table 3-10: UFS XRF data - Whole coal analyses - Mixtures of samples LK1 and LU13 Sample Si02 Cal. Diff. AI203 Cal. Diff. Fe203 Cal. Diff. CaO Cal. Diff. LK1-100 2.11 2.11 0.00 2.17 2.17 0.00 7.51 7.51 0.00 3.25 3.25 0.00 LK75LU25 2.93 2.66 0.27 2.66 2.32 0.35 5.48 5.65 -0.17 2.74 2.61 0.14 LK50LU50 3.74 3.22 0.53 2.92 2.47 0.46 3.21 3.80 -0.59 2.08 1.96 0.12 LK25LU75 3.85 3.77 0.09 2.93 2.61 0.32 1.39 1.94 -0.55 1.37 1.32 0.06 LU13-100 4.32 4.32 0.00 2.76 2.76 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.67 0.67 0.00 Table 3-10: UFS XRF data - Whole coal analvses - Mixtures of samples LK1 and LU13 (continued) Sample Ti02 Cal. MgO Cal. Na20 Cal. K20 Cal. P20S LK1-100 0.08 0.08 0.40 0.40 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 LK75LU25 0.10 0.10 0.33 0.31 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.00 LK50LU50 0.11 0.11 0.24 0.22 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.00 LK25LU75 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.00 LU13-100 0.14 0.14 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.07 0.00 Table 3-10: UFS XRF data - Whole coal analyses - Mixtures of samples LK1 and LU13 (continued) Sample S Cal. H2O- Cal. LOl Cal. Total Cal. LK1-100 1.44 1.44 3.3 3.3 78.76 78.76 99.06 99.06 LK75LU25 1.20 1.22 3.39 3.39 80.65 80.65 99.52 98.94 LK50LU50 0.99 1.00 3.47 3.47 82.54 82.54 99.35 98.83 LK25LU75 0.78 0.77 3.56 3.56 84.42 84.42 98.62 98.71 LU13-100 0.55 0.55 3.64 3.64 86.31 86.31 98.59 98.59 From Table 3.10 it is evident that the Si02 concentrations are slightly higher than the calculated concentrations, but without a trend favouring a range of compositions. The variation in differences is attributed to sampling/mixing variations rather than mass absorption effects. A similar argument applies for AI203 concentrations. Fe203 3 -14 concentrations, on the other hand, are slightly lower than calculated. For the Si02 concentration the largest deviation also occurred in mixture LK50LU50. This was probably also due to sampling/mixing variations. It must be remembered that sampling from a low atomic substance such as coal can present deviations due to the settling of heavy component such as FeS2. Since the possibility of mass absorption has been taken into account by analysing mixtures of the samples mentioned above, and the ashing of coal samples could bring about changes to the chemical constituents, whole coal XRF analyses were carried out on the coal samples. Standard XRF techniques used at UFS was applied to the sediment samples together with XRD analyses on coal and sediment samples. The results are discussed in the next section. 3 -15 3.2 Distribution of mineral matter in investigated samples and possible mode of occurrence All statistical analyses were performed using the software Microsoft Excel and STATISTICA V.5. In some cases outliers were excluded to ensure accurate results. All raw datasets are tabulated in Appendix 2 and are clustered according to the mines were samples were collected. 3.2.1 Chemical composition of coal and sediment samples 3.2.1.1 The Witbank Coalfield a. NO.1 coal seam Coal from this seam is characterised by low total ash percentages averaging at 25%, and increasing from west to east across the field. With the exception of sample 3957 from Arnot-North Mine which was provided by other sources, oxides and trace elements are distributed evenly. The latter sample is located in the vicinity of samples collected at Arnot Mine. However, even though this section of the coal field is known to have higher ash percentages, the elevated Si02 percentage in sample 3957 could be the result of different sampling methods, emphasising the importance of consistency and accuracy during sampling procedures. This coal sample could have been carbonaceous shale which was mistaken for coal, or it could have been contaminated. It was therefore excluded from further calculations. As seen from Table 3-11, oxide concentrations for the coal samples are in good agreement with brief studies carried out by previous researchers, and no unusual results were obtained. Si02, A1203, K20 and Ti02 all decrease from east to west, while Fe203 and S which are similarly distributed and more abundant in the south- eastern region due to the presence of pyrite. In this instance CaO and MgO are abundant in the southern and north-eastern regions respectively, while elevated concentrations of P20s are located in the extreme western region of the seam. 3 -16 Table 3-11: The minimum, maximum and average concentrations of oxides (wt%) and trace elements (ppm) in No.1 coal seam Element Min. Max. Ave. Element Min. Max. Ave. Si02 0.00 17.01 8.58 Rb 0.00 14.7 3.42 Ti02 0.24 0.91 0.43 Ba 12.46 231.88 109.93 AI203 2.18 8.41 5.04 Sr 26.37 175.27 92.55 Fe203 0.04 3.41 1.16 Zr 7.20 177.91 87.65 S 0.27 1.67 0.73 Nb 3.43 16.94 9.40 MnO 0.00 0.00 0.00 y 12.89 40.94 24.51 MgO 0.00 0.25 0.09 Sc 1.07 13.45 6.39 CaO 0.00 1.57 0.57 Cr 14.37 110.22 42.58 Na20 0.00 0.01 0.00 Cu 4.22 46.01 14.23 K20 0.00 0.18 0.08 V 13.49 111.2 43.33 P20S 0.00 0.44 0.06 Zn 7.28 48.38 22.58 Mn 0.00 200.01 71.89 Ni 8.30 202.47 54.19 There are no specific visible trends in the distribution of trace elements in the seam, but certain elements occur in a similar pattern. These concentrations were not significantly elevated, and considerable values could probably be as a result of the nature of the source material. The high-lying north-eastern region is characterised by high concentrations of V, Y, Cu, Ba and Mn varying between 0.00 and >200 ppm. Nb, Zr and Ni are highest at the northern and southern centres of the seam, while reasonable concentrations of Cr, Cu, Rb, Sr and Zn are located in the south-eastern region. High Sc concentrations are found in the eastern and western parts together with significant Zn. Some significant concentrations of Sr and Yare found in the north-western and south-western regions, respectively. There are numerous occurrences of noteworthy correlation coefficients between major and trace elements. This could be because some elements were abundant in the primary environment, or because some elements occur in the same minerals. Similarly, there are many correlations which are merely coincidence due to the fact that the number of samples were insufficient, and that numerous elements occur in low concentrations in the assemblage. The significant and useful correlations could be explained either in terms of their geochemical characteristics, the source material or the depositional environment. 3 -17 High correlations for a total of 17 coal samples exists between Si02 and, Ti02 and A1203, and even more so between Ti02 and Ab03 (r=0.935). Si02 often makes up the bulk of the mineral assemblage and is thus well correlated with the total ash percentage. Aluminium occurs in feldspars, micas, non-kaolinite clay minerals and kaolinite. Feldspars and micas are frequently absent from the mineral assemblage, and this is apparent in the low concentrations of Na and K, suggesting that the relationship between AI203 and Ti02 as seen in Figure 3.5, could be limited to the presence of kaolinite. Ti02 in coal is reported to occur in oxides, clays and complexed with organic matter (Azzie, 2002). However, no prominent correlation exists between Ti and kaolinite found in the normative interpretation. The presence of the Ti phase anatase has not been supported by XRD studies in this study, but this does not exclude the possibility of a separate Ti phase occurring. According to Ward et al. (1999) AI and Ti are soluble in highly acid conditions, thus the Ti could be precipitated in conjunction with the kaolinite within the structure or as a separate phase. Anatase is also common as a minor constituent in Australian coals (Ward et aI., 1999). Although there is a clear absence of feldspars and micas in the coals and very low concentrations of K20 and Na20, a good correlation exists between K20, Rb and Ba as seen in Figure 3.6. This could be expected seeing that the source material is broadly accepted to originate from the north (Cadle et aI., 1990) where abundant igneous rocks are present. The correlation between K and Ba could be attributed to the geochemical association between these elements. The presence of feldspars and their close relationship with Ba and Rb is therefore also explained. Concentrations of Na20 are often below the detection limit, therefore, no accurate analyses could be performed with the Na20 values. 3 -18 1.(lO ,--------------------------------, 0.90 • 0.80 • 0.70 0.60 I0.50 ;ë:: • • • 0.40 •• • • •• 0.30 • • • • 0.20 0.10 O.OO"-------------------------~ 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 AI,O, (wt%) Figure 3.5 - Relationship between Ti02 and AI203 concentrations The expected correlation between Fe203 and S (r=0.939) is primarily due to the presence of pyrite and can be seen in Figure 3.7. The outlier in the north-eastern corner of the graph may force such an exceptional correlation, but correlations between Fe and S are very high in other coal seam sample sets. Ni also shows a good correlation with Fe203 and S, and to a lesser extent with pyrite. This is common in other seams in the field and might be due to some relationship between Ni and Fe, but insufficient data was available for this seam to draw any definite conclusions. Apart from feldspars, carbonate minerals in coal account for almost all MgO and CaO concentrations in the form of dolomite and calcite (Gaigher, 1980). 3 -19 250.00 -,---------------------------, 200.00 150.00 100.00 50.00 0.00 .'--------~-----------------_4 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20 K,O(wt%) Figure 3.6 - Relationship between K20 and Ba concentrations 4.50 ,-----------------------------, 4.00 3.50 3.00 1.50 1.00 .... ... 0.50 •• 0.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 Fe,O, (wt%) Figure 3.7 - Relationship between Fe20a and S concentrations There are a few good yet unusual correlations observed between Cr and Si02 (r=0.877), Ti02 (r=0.899), AI203 (r=0.805), Na20 (r=0.885) and K20 (r=0.924), between Vand Si02 (r=0.929), Ti02 (r=0.946), AI203 (r=0.831), Na20 (r=0.951) and K20 (r=0.972), and between Zr and Ti02 (r=0.927) and AI203 (r=0.899). As noted by Azzie (2002) the occurrence of Cr, Vand Zr could be a reflection of the source 3 -20 material, and similarly, Ward et al. (1999) has observed positive correlations between these elements and other oxides. However, this is an isolated incidence occurring mainly in the No. 1 seam coal. The associations of some rare earth element with phosphate minerals from the goyazite-crandallite group are also not overlooked as phosphate minerals have been observed in other sample sets used in this study. The correlation between Zr and Ti02 is probably derived from their geochemical relationship which is prominent in other rock types as well. Mineral and oxide distributions in the roof and floor lithologies are very different from the coal as is to be expected. These rocks consist of varying proportions of siltstone, sandstone and carbonaceous shale. Although it was difficult to draw up useful correlations due to the limited amount of samples, a brief indication of the chemical composition is provided with these analyses. Table 3-12: The minimum, maximum and average concentrations of oxides (wt%) and trace elements (ppm) in siltstone floor rocks of NO.1 coal seam Element Min. Max. Ave. Element Min. Max. Ave. Si02 34.53 61.87 46.78 Ba 115.20 251.50 197.94 Ti02 0.83 2.15 1.51 Sr 16.30 63.50 46.60 AI203 7.33 22.32 14.10 Zr 182.60 391.40 273.33 Fe203 0.38 4.15 1.83 Nb 5.20 17.50 12.09 S 0.18 0.99 0.43 Y 7.50 31.30 20.86 MnO 0.00 0.04 0.02 Sc 12.50 27.30 21.50 MgO 0.00 0.15 0.05 Cr 187.20 341.30 276.91 CaO 0.01 0.18 0.09 Cu 3.20 64.10 29.51 Na20 0.02 0.15 0.07 V 194.50 403.10 303.41 K20 0.38 1.10 0.73 Zn 31.70 56.70 45.67 P20S 0.02 0.04 0.03 Ni 18.80 382.20 133.31 Rb 0.00 33.70 12.33 Co 6.40 69.10 29.37 As expected the Si02 content of the sandstones of the floor rocks were the highest followed by the siltstone as shown in Table 3-12, and then shale. Abundant AI203 was observed in the only shale sample available while Fe203 and S were abundant in the siltstone floor rocks. Low concentrations of Ca and Mg is supported by the absence of carbonate in the XRD patterns of most of these rocks, while the increase in K20 in comparison to the coal is very prominent and probably due to the presence of illite frequently occurring in the roof and floor lithologies. 3 -21 ..xr.t.l. I11UOTID Elevated concentrations of Ba, V, Cr and Zr are present in all three rock types, but this time the possibility of phosphate association is ruled out by the low P20s concentration. This occurrence might once again be due to source rock influence. An exceptionally large concentration of Ni observed in the siltstone samples, in which the Fe203 and S contents are once again the highest. Seeing that the coal and siltstone samples in which Fe203, S and Ni are well correlated are not in the same vicinity, and some samples appear to be outliers, no specific reason could be provided for this occurrence. However, the probability of Ni's association with Fe becomes unavoidable. Table 3-13: The minimum, maximum and average concentrations of oxides (wt%) and trace elements (ppm) in sandstone roof rocks of NO.1 coal seam Element Min. Max. Ave. Element Min. Max. Ave. Si02 76.66 91.25 85.39 Ba 24.60 223.10 114.31 Ti02 0.29 1.44 0.93 Sr 20.80 208.80 77.38 AI203 3.13 7.45 4.90 Zr 181.60 662.00 435.03 Fe203 0.71 4.01 1.95 Nb 8.70 26.10 16.45 S 0.03 1.44 0.58 Y 3.60 19.50 12.03 MnO 0.00 0.07 0.03 Sc 0.00 8.60 4.04 MgO 0.00 1.63 0.43 Cr 58.40 178.00 108.69 CaO 0.00 4.71 1.26 Cu 0.00 6.30 2.56 Na20 0.01 0.11 0.05 V 30.40 69.30 44.15 K20 0.09 1.42 0.83 Zn 14.10 91.40 44.31 P20S 0.02 0.03 0.02 Ni 9.20 215.90 75.15 Rb 0.00 35.50 18.61 Co 0.00 164.40 51.14 Roof rocks of the No. 1 coal seam consisted of some sandstones and one siltstone sample. The bulk mineralogy of sandstones does not always consist strictly of quartz as seen in Table 3-13. Sandstones in this case show observations of elevated Fe203 and CaO percentages. Dolomite has been detected in the sandstone and siltstone samples containing reasonable amounts of CaO and MgO. It is possible for this carbonate to exist with calcite in the same assemblage; however, from XRD patterns dolomite or ferroan dolomite for that matter is detected more often in the sediment samples than in the coals, was also noted by Azzie (2002). K20 concentrations are supported by the presence of feldspars and illite/smectite clays in the siltstone and sandstones. Although pyrite is mainly associated with the 3 -22 coal, nodules of this mineral have been observed in hand specimen in roof and floor rocks. Good correlation exists between K20, Rb and Ba as in the case with the coal. A high concentration of Zr is once again well correlated with Ti02, as well as with Nb. The occurrence of Zr in coal as discrete particles has been noted by Ward et al. (1999). In the latter case a strong correlation between Zr and Ti02 was observed. Significant correlations exist between Ni, Fe and S along with reasonable correlations between Sr and MgO (r=O.993) and CaO (r=O.995). Seeing that low P concentrations are present and a negative correlation (r=-O.022) exists between P and Sr, supported by no phosphate phases in the XRD patterns, it is unlikely that Sr-phosphates might be present. Correlation between Cr, V, and Cu, and between Ni and Co are probably a result of geochemical similarities, although their modes of occurrence are variable. b. NO.2 coal seam A total of 138 coal samples were collected from this seam on which analyses were done. With this sample set it was possible to make conclusions from some contours graphs drawn using STATISTICA V.5. Si02, Ti02, A1203, Na20 and K20 concentrations are distributed along a northeast- southwest strike as seen from Figures 3.8 to 3.12. These components are primarily derived from, and are associated with the mineralogy of the source material. The association of Ti02 and AI203 is once again evident in their distribution as well as their correlation coefficient (r=O.784). The magnitude of this sample set also makes it possible to avoid unusual correlations based on lower concentrations and insufficient data. A noticeable and expected correlation exists between K20 and Rb (r=O.785), between Sr and P20S (r=O.681), and between Ba and Sr (r=O.813). These relationships are due to the association of K20 and Rb in the primary environment, and the association of Sr, Ba and P20S with Ca-aluminophosphate minerals such as crandallite and goyazite. 3 -23 Si02 distribution for No.2 Coal Seam (138 sampling points) -2840000 -2860000 cooro _ 0.291o _ 3.168>- _ 6.045 -2880000 _ 8.921 CJ 11.798 CJ 14.675 CJ 17.552 _ 20.428 _ 23.305 -2900000 _ 26.182L...- ~~~ __ ~__.__: -10000 10000 30000 50000 70000 90000 _ above XCOORD Figure 3.8 - Si02 distribution in the No.2 coal seam Ti02 distribution for No.2 Coal Seam (138 sampling points) -2840000 -2860000 cooro _ -0.113 >o- _ -0.026_ 0.061 -2880000 _ 0.148 CJ 0.235 CJ 0.322 CJ 0.408 _ 0.495 _ 0.582 -2900000~---------~-~----L--~~--~ _ 0.669 -10000 10000 30000 50000 70000 90000 _ above XCOORD Figure 3.9 - Ti02 distribution in the No.2 coal seam 3 -24 AI203 distribution for No.2 Coal Seam (138 sampling points) -2840000 -2860000 o oa:o _ -0.35 >o- _0.89_ 2.131 -2880000 _ 3.371 04.611 05.852 D 7.092 _ 8.333 _ 9.573 _ 10.813 -2900000"'- -10000 10000 30000 50000 70000 90000 _ above XCOORD Figure 3.10 - AI203 distribution in the No.2 coal seam Na20 distribution for No.2 Coal Seam (138 sampling points) -2840000 -2860000 o a: oo _ -0.023o _ 0.004>- BO.03 -2880000 _ 0.057 00.084 00.111 D 0.138 _ 0.165 _ 0.191 _ 0.218 -2900000 -10000 10000 30000 50000 70000 90000 _ above XCOORD Figure 3.11 - Na20 distribution in the No.2 coal seam 3 -25 K20 distribution for NO.2 Coal Seam (138 sampling points) -2860000 ocr: oo _ -0.051o _ -0.025>- _ 0.002 -2880000 _ 0.029 CJ 0.056 CJ 0.082 D 0.109 _ 0.136 _ 0.163 _ 0.189 -2900000 -10000 10000 30000 50000 70000 90000 _ above XCOORD Figure 3.12 - K20 distribution in the NO.2 coal seam The most striking relationship in this seam is the correlation between Fe203 and S. With a correlation coefficient of 0.901 it is expected that the Fe203 and S distribution would be reasonably similar. Despite the two outliers in Figure 3.15, there is still an exceptional correlation. However, the contour maps present a different situation. Figures 3.13 and 3.14 illustrate the Fe203 and S distribution respectively. There is an overlap of the highest concentrations for both elements in the north-western region of the seam, but the elevated amounts of Fe203 in the northern and southern regions are very obvious. After calculating the amount of Fe203 needed to combine with the total S (all sulphur was thus assumed to have been inorganic/pyritic sulphur), the percentage of Fe203 left was distributed in a similar pattern to that seen in Figure 3.13. Only four cases were observed in which S was left after forming pyrite. This distribution for Fe could be as a result of, firstly, the fact that Fe could be present in higher proportions in carbonates such as dolomite and siderite, and clays such as montmorillonite, both of which were present in XRD interpretations. Secondly, because the samples were not heated, the only S that could have been lost was due to oxidation in air during storage or in nature, leaving an excess of Fe. Organic sulphur is rarely present in larger concentrations than 0.6 wt% (Ward et aI., 1999). 3 -26 Fe203 distribution for NO.2 Coal Seam (138 sampling points) -2840000 -2860000 ocor:o _ -0.521o _ -0.092>- _ 0.338 -2880000 _ 0.767 D 1.196 D 1.626 D 2.055 _ 2.484 _ 2.914 -2900000 L.....~~ ~~.....:::".~~~~_.: _ 3.343 -10000 10000 30000 50000 70000 90000 _ above XCOORD Figure 3.13 - Fe203 distribution in the NO.2 coal seam S distribution for NO.2 Coal Seam (138 sampling points) -2840000 -2860000 ocor:o _ 0.295o _ 0.417 >- _ 0.538 -2880000 _0.66 D 0.781 D 0.903 D 1.024 _ 1.146 _ 1.267 _ 1.389 -2900000 -10000 10000 30000 50000 70000 90000 _ above XCOORD Figure 3.14 - S distribution in the NO.2 coal seam Thus, it is more likely for this excess Fe to be captured in other mineral phases. 3 -27 9.00 r-------------------------------, • 8.00 7.00 6.00 • _ 5.00 • "il- • !. • Cf) 4.00 • • 3.00 • 2.00 .. ...~ . ••• • ••• • . •• 1.00 ~.:~ : • • # 0.00 ~--~- •.:...--------------------------__l 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 Fe203 (wt%) Figure 3.15 - Relationship between Fe203 and S concentrations CaO, MgO and P20s distributions are similar to that of S. The biggest difficulty in sampling roof and floor lithologies lies in the fact that some mines leave a layer of coal at the top and bottom of the mineable horizons; the coal seams are sometimes just too thick to be able to reach roof rocks, and borehole material in which the whole seam can be sampled is not always available. Table 3.14: The minimum, maximum and average concentrations of oxides (wt%) and trace elements (ppm) in sandstone floor rocks of NO.2 coal seam Element Min. Max. Ave. Element Min. Max. Ave. Si02 43.34 84.73 66.91 Ba 55.70 367.30 195.69 Ti02 0.38 1.73 1.00 Sr 23.90 498.40 184.42 AI203 4.42 29.00 13.92 Zr 65.10 448.70 215.93 Fe203 0.79 5.22 2.13 Nb 6.70 36.10 16.39 S 0.06 0.58 0.24 Y 1.70 57.20 18.97 MnO 0.00 0.16 0.04 Sc 2.40 38.50 13.32 MgO 0.00 6.12 1.47 Cr 40.30 764.30 268.72 CaO 0.02 8.42 2.69 Cu 0.00 96.70 23.25 Na20 0.00 0.20 0.07 V 13.80 1018.70 296.49 K20 0.30 0.96 0.60 Zn 11.30 94.30 44.00 P20S 0.01 0.12 0.05 Ni 9.10 194.90 54.26 Rb 0.70 108.90 29.50 Co 0.00 83.00 18.66 3 -28 The floor rocks of the NO.2 coal seam consisted mainly of sandstone, siltstone and carbonaceous shale of which too few samples were obtained to draw up any useful correlations. Si02 concentrations in sandstones shown in Table 3.14 are slightly lower than in those of the NO.1 seam roof samples; however, Fe203, CaO, MgO, Na20 and K20 concentrations are similar. The elevated Fe203 would be as a result of the presence of siderite, while K20 and Na20 are supported by an increase in illite in the sediments, as observed in the XRD interpretations. The carbonates calcite and dolomite often occur together with siderite. In this case no definite explanation could be given for the increased V concentrations, but the Ni and Fe203 concentrations are also elevated. AI203 and K20 concentrations in the siltstone rocks range from 10 to 24 wt % and 0.64 to 1.48 wt%, respectively. This could be accounted for by the presence of kaolinite, K-feldspars and illite. This situation is the same for the two carbonaceous shale samples, although they contain abundant Ti02 and Fe203 in addition to AI203 and K20, which is evident as the XRD patterns show traces of siderite for these samples. Carbonaceous shale roof rocks of the NO.2 coal seam are similar in chemical composition to the floor shales apart from an average increase in P20s of 0.30 wt%. The corresponding Ba and Sr values for elevated P20s are as high as 1000 and 900 ppm, respectively. This elevated P20s, Ba and Sr is supported by the presence of fluorapatite in XRD interpretations. Siltstone ~amples collected in the roof of this seam are almost identical to the floor siltstones in terms of major element oxides and trace elements. c. NO.4 coal seam While the Si02, Ti02, A1203, Fe203 and S contents of this seam are similar to concentrations in the NO.1 and NO.2 coal seams, CaO and P20S show elevations as indicated in Table 3-15. Si02 and AI203 (r=0.880) correlate well and are highest in the north-north eastern region of the seam, suggesting a possible change in direction of the influx of source material or a change in depositional conditions. Both Fe203 and S distributions correspond since their concentrations decrease from west to 3 -29 east. P20S is highest mainly in the middle of the seam, while high Ca values are found in the south-western area, decreasing towards the east. Kaolinite is often present as the dominant silicate in some of the mineralogical assemblages. This corresponding distribution of Si02 and AI203 could be the result of the weathering of feldspars or to the existence of favourable conditions enabling kaolinite precipitation. The presence of kaolinite suggests an acid leaching or freshwater environment, while the chemical breakdown of feldspar occurs rather in a freshwater environment than in an alkaline or marine environment (Buhrnann and Buhrnann, 1987). According to Ward (2002), AI is soluble under low pH conditions, and could be leached out from detrital minerals and transported to areas with conditions suitable for kaolinite precipitation. Thus, interaction of AI203 with any silica in solution would result in the formation of authigenic kaolinite, depending on the conditions (Ward, 2002). It is also possible that an igneous source with abundant K-feldspar provided this silica and alumina, but most of the feldspar has been weathered giving rise to more kaolinite. Thus, the distribution of Si02 and AI203 could be controlled by the source material but more likely by the solubility and precipitation conditions of kaolinite. Pyrite, occurring mainly as a secondary or authigenic mineral phase, is the main reason for the distribution of Fe203 and S (r=0.926) in this manner. It is linked to marine influences during peat formation (Buhrnann and Buhrnann, 1987). Calcite and dolomite are both abundant in the seam, while fluorapatite accounts for the majority of P20S and some of the CaO and Ab03 concentrations. The correlation between P20S and Sr (r=0.886) implies that phosphates from the crandallite group could be present, even though only fluorapatite has been detected in XRD interpretations. 3 -30 Table 3.15: The minimum, maximum and average concentrations of oxides (wt%) and trace elements (ppm) in NO.4 coal seam Element Min. Max. Ave. Element Min. Max. Ave. Si02 0.00 27.63 8.69 Rb 0.00 92.85 11.64 Ti02 0.06 2.19 0.39 Ba 73.35 2902.38 590.28 AI203 1.45 12.89 5.11 Sr 58.96 3646.04 703.26 Fe203 0.06 6.78 2.32 Zr 0.00 657.48 88.60 S 0.31 4.66 1.90 Nb 0.00 22.01 7.42 MnO 0.00 0.00 0.00 y 3.27 50.98 18.03 MgO 0.03 0.74 0.28 Sc 0.00 37.70 7.36 CaO 0.00 4.86 2.27 Cr 0.00 1049.21 53.21 Na20 0.00 0.16 0.04 Cu 5.22 53.77 17.15 K20 0.00 0.56 0.16 V 2.66 468.68 45.92 P20S 0.00 1.82 0.48 Zn 0.34 56.77 8.11 Mn 0.00 401.72 98.55 Ni 2.60 102.38 19.97 The sandstones in the roof and floor lithologies of this seam are characterised by elevated concentrations of A1203,Ti02 and K20 in comparison to the same rocks of the NO.1 and No. 2 seams. Fe203 is also abundant in the roof sandstones; however S values are low averaging 0.31 wt%. Illite, kaolinite and K-feldspar are well defined in the XRD patterns, but siderite could not be detected easily, suggesting that Fe could be caught up in minor montmorillonite and dolomite. The trace element distributions are very similar to other sandstones with no remarkable correlations except between elements and oxides with specific geochemical relationships; while siltstone and carbonaceous shale roof and floor rocks are also very similar to those of the other seams. NO.4 coal seam has a reasonably constant parting consisting of sandstone at Arnot, Douglas, Forzando and Optimum Mines, siltstone in the Rietspruit Mine area and carbonaceous shale at Tavistock Mine. The trace element concentrations are considerably lower and sometimes similar to those in floor and roof lithologies of the same rock type, while major element oxides are compatible as well. d. NO.5 coal seam Table 3-16 illustrates that the NO.5 coal seam contains Si02, Ti02, A1203,Fe203 and S concentrations which are compatible to the lower seams, along with very low 3 -31 concentrations of CaO, MgO and P205. At the few locations where samples were available for this coal seam, the Si02, Ti02, AI203 and K20 concentrations decrease from west to east. Fe203 and S, on the other hand, are distributed evenly amongst the sample localities. Na20 is almost negligible throughout all the coals and trace elements are not much different either. The expected correlations are present and so too correlations which arise due to insufficient cases during matrix calculations. Table 3.16: The minimum, maximum and average concentrations of oxides (wt%) and trace elements (ppm) in NO.5 coal seam Element Min. Max. Ave. Element Min. Max. Ave. Si02 5.79 29.27 13.05 Rb 0.00 65.71 19.12 Ti02 0.07 0.47 0.19 Ba 0.00 751.48 145.56 AI203 2.17 11.15 4.79 Sr 2.85 143.39 52.07 Fe203 0.22 3.15 1.29 Zr 34.32 340.10 116.80 S 0.34 1.82 0.91 Nb 6.51 41.81 14.26 MnO 0.00 0.00 0.00 y 0.94 29.60 11.23 MgO 0.00 0.28 0.12 Sc 0.10 11.37 3.85 CaO 0.00 0.13 0.04 Cr 0.00 107.09 15.75 Na20 0.00 0.02 0.00 Cu 3.73 15.09 8.51 K20 0.15 1.04 0.39 V 5.80 59.18 21.67 P20S 0.00 0.00 0.00 Zn 0.00 9.83 3.89 Mn 0.00 7.50 2.09 Ni 0.00 12.39 2.28 Sandstones, siltstones and carbonaceous shale also make up the roof and floor rocks of the No. 5 coal seam. The only noticeable difference is that all rock types contain significant elevations in MgO which could mainly be accounted for by the presence of montmorillonite in the XRD interpretations. CaO and K20 concentrations were considerable too averaging at 0.28 and 2.72 wt% respectively, and since almost no calcite was present, CaO and K20 are accounted for by plagioclase feldspar in a few siltstones. Siderite appeared to be a dominant component in some of the XRD interpretations in accordance with the higher Fe203 and low S values, but some of the Fe203 forms part of the montmorillonite phase. Kaolinite, illite and K- feldspar are often found together with siderite in most roof and floor rocks 3-32 3.2.1.2 The Highveld Coalfield a. NO.4 coal seam Although fewer samples were obtained in this coalfield, Figure 3.16 illustrates that the concentrations of some major element oxides are similar except for the few samples analysed. However, due to insufficient data, a clear distribution could not be detected, but the data still gives an indication of what major differences exist between the two fields. All except CaO and Na20 concentrations are very similar to not only the No.4 seam coals in the Witbank Coalfield, but also th~ other seams as well. The mineral components consist of quartz, major kaolinite, calcite, dolomite, pyrite, siderite and sometimes major phosphate phases. K-feldspar has also been detected on rare occasions. Correlations between Fe203 and S (r=0.887), P20s and Sr (r=0.933), and K20 and Rb (0.765) are due to the presence of pyrite and crandallite, and the geochemical association between K and Rb, respectively. Ba and Sr are the only trace elements showing any elevation in concentration, while the others are in good agreement with those observed in the seams of the Witbank Coalfield. Roof and floor lithologies for this seam consist of sandstones and siltstones. Siltstones from the roof and floor rocks are characterised by high Fe203 and K20 concentrations which is evident in the presence of siderite and K-feldspar in some of the XRD interpretations. Floor sandstones contain less Si02 and more AI203 than roof sandstones in which major illite and feldspars are present. The Fe203:S ratio is high suggesting that most of the Fe is probably accounted for by siderite, since montmorillonite is not a prominent phase in the assemblage. Trace element concentrations for sandstone and siltstones are similar. 3 -33 Chemical Composition Profile - NO.4 coal seam - Highvel Coalfield 60 50 40 ncao ~ .s ! ClFe20330 "0 ClAI203 '"0C .Ti02 ClSi02 20 10 0 Figure 3.16 - Variations in concentration of some element oxides and sulphide in NO.4 coal seam b. NO.5coal seam Unlike the NO.5 seam in the Witbank Coalfield, this seam contains noticeable concentrations of Si02, CaO, MgO and Na20; however illite, feldspars and the carbonates were not detected in the XRD patterns of these samples. Fe203 and S (r=O.840) has a significant correlation. A few sandstone and shale samples were collected from the roof and floor lithologies, both of which do not contain any significantly elevated concentrations of major or trace elements. 3.2.2 X-ray Diffraction Interpretation 3.2.2.1 The Witbank Coalfield The X-ray diffraction interpretation method applied at the University of the Free State involves comparing the diffraction scan to separate peak files for minerals included in the software database. All diffraction peaks may not be completely visible, but, depending on the operator, this method could be applied with great accuracy since the interpretation relies primarily on the researcher's discretion. The occurrence of 3 -34 these minerals in the XRD diffraction patterns are supported by their chemical compositions as explained in the previous sections. One problem that arises in these interpretations concerns chemical components which are present in low concentrations. Phases such as illite, montmorillonite and feldspar are never abundant or rarely occur as major phases in coal, thus the low concentrations of K20 and Na20 are not always represented clearly in the XRD pattern. Similarly, an abundance of a specific element from XRF results does not necessarily mean that it is indicative of a specific phase. Fe is one such element which occurs in various mineral phases. It is easy to make an assumption that most of the Fe would be accounted for by sulphides in this case; however, if gaseous compounds such as S03 and CO2 are unknown, assumptions as to whether the distribution of Fe would be as sulphides or carbonates should be done with great care. Minerals detected in the XRD patterns were semi-quantitatively evaluated in terms of dominant (>40% of the mineral fraction), major (10-40%), minor (2-10%), accessory (1-2%) and rare «1 %) constituents. The interpretations will be discussed according to the phases prominent in each seam. Examples of diffraction scans with identified peaks are illustrated in Figures A2-1 to A2-6 on pages A2-87 to A2-92 in Appendix 2. All samples were analysed in accordance with specifications set out in Appendix 1. All XRD interpretations are tabulated in Appendix 2 according to sampling localities. a. NO.1 coal seam The mineralogical composition of coal deposits across the world consists of a dominant assemblage of quartz, kaolinite, clay minerals, sulphides, carbonates and phosphates, and some rare minerals characteristic of the depositional environment or the source material. Quartz and kaolinite commonly occur as the dominant phases in this seam. Calcite, dolomite and pyrite occur mainly as minor phases. It is rather difficult to distinguish between illite and illite/smectite interstratification using' this technique since there are a few peak overlaps occurring at the major illite peak 28 position, but this phase is not abundant in the seam. Siderite is prominent for a mineral that occurs mainly in the roof and floor lithologies, even though it was only in minor concentrations. Low concentrations of fluorapatite have been detected in 3 -35 samples from Kleinkopje Mine, while minor montmorillonite is observed in the Arnot Mine area. Roof and floor rocks are dominated by quartz, kaolinite and sometimes minor feldspars and clay minerals. b. NO.2 coal seam Kaolinite, calcite and dolomite are the dominant phases in the NO.2 seam. Dolomite is more often than not present in larger concentrations than calcite, and sometimes only one of these carbonates appear along with dominant kaolinite proportions. Pyrite and montmorillonite occur as minor phases together with the phosphates fluorapatite and crandalillte. Fluorapatite is present mainly in samples in the western region of the seam, and decreases towards the east. Crandallite was observed only in one sample from the Leeufontein Mine. Quartz is present in most of the samples and it's concentration might vary from dominant to accessory in the coal samples, but it is clearly one of the prevalent phases in the roof and floor lithologies. K-feldspar is prominent in the sandstones, while illite is more common in the siltstones and shales. Plagioclase was found infrequently, while siderite constantly appeared in sandstone samples. Calcite and dolomite are present in the sediments, but mainly in lower concentrations. Pyrite rarely makes an appearance in sandstones, but sometimes it can be one of the major phases especially at the roof-coal interface. This precipitation could be due to a change in Eh at the interface. In order to determine whether there were any differences in the mineralogical or geochemical nature of coal with different roof lithologies, coal underlying sandstones, siltstones and shales were analysed and compared. This might have given an indication of the environmental conditions under which the sediments were deposited, but the only definite conclusion that could be made was that the general mineralogical and chemical compositions of coal were very similar. 3 -36 c. NO.4 and NO.5 coal seams As expected, quartz concentrations seem to decrease towards the west while kaolinite is almost ubiquitous throughout the seams. Calcite, dolomite and montmorillonite still occur in minor concentrations and pyrite sometimes as a major component, while K-feldspar has been observed as an accessory constituent. Once again illite and siderite in the roof and floor rocks contain similar concentrations compared to the other seams. 3.2.2.2 The Highveld Coalfield a. NO.4 and NO.5 coal seams Mineral distributions in the Highveld Coalfield are similar to the coal and sediment mineralogy of the Witbank Coalfield. The main constituents, quartz, kaolinite, calcite, dolomite and minor montmorillonite, occur in the coal in varying proportions, while illite, siderite and K-feldspar are more common in the roof and floor rocks. Only one occurrence of crandallite and plagioclase feldspar was observed in samples BH1-5 and BHW3-5 respectively. In addition, pyrite concentrations are much lower in comparison to the Witbank Coalfield. The XRD interpretation provided a useful indication as to which phases governed the mineralogy and which were enriched or depleted as a result of depositional or source material influences. 3.2.3 Normative Mineralogical Interpretation using Sednorm The software used to determine the normative mineralogy, called SEDNORM, was designed by D. R. Cohen and C. R. Ward at the Department of Applied Geology, University of New South Wales, Australia. It calculates the mineralogy especially of sedimentary rocks based on chemical analyses. The sequence of allocating elements or oxides to the various minerals is a function of observed sedimentary mineral assemblages, mineral stabilities in surface environments and the restriction 3 -37 of certain elements to specific minerals e.g. (phosphorus completely contained in apatite). There is some degree of independent mineralogical data required (XRD, SEM or optical petrology) to control whether minerals such as feldspar, muscovite and montmorillonite are present and the control of compositional parameters for minerals such montmorillonite (within certain restrictions) is optional (SEDNORM - Users Manual, 1990). The principles which have to be applied in order to derive the normative mineralogy from the oxide percentages are set out as follows: i. Both apatite and crandallite may exist in coals, but phosphorus is assumed to be present in apatite since it is the dominant phosphate in sedimentary rocks. ii. Any sulphur present is assumed to be consumed in pyrite or gypsum, depending on the degree of oxidation. iii. Chlorine is allocated to halite. iv. The distribution of potassium between K-feldspar, illite and muscovite can be fixed and any excess potassium remaining after the clays or muscovite are formed can be assigned to K-feldspar. v. Options are available to assign calcium and magnesium to the carbonates first and then apatite and gypsum, or in the preferred order. The carbonates permitted are calcite, magnesite and siderite, and calcite is formed in preference to siderite with excess iron being assigned to hematite. vi. The inclusion of montmorillonite is optional, and a choice is provided regarding the cation ratios in the smectite component, if it appears to be present from sources such as XRD. vii. To compensate for minor errors in differentiating between structural and absorbed water, the water content could be increased until the AI203 and Si02 are exhausted. Any alumina and silica left will be assigned to gibbsite and quartz, respectively. 3 -38 viii. In the event of excess chlorine being present sodium is added to the system to form halite, and similarly chlorine is added to form halite if excess sodium is present after feldspar is formed. The program was applied successfully by Ward et al. (1999) in a study concerning the mineralogy of sandstones; however it's use in the determination of coal mineralogy has proved to be limited in this study. Nonetheless, correlations between the normative mineralogy and the chemical composition are fairly consistently. 3.2.3.1 Coal Correlations are obtained between quartz and Si02 (r=0.767), pyrite and, Fe203 (r=0.933) and S (r=0.960), siderite and Fe203 (0.885), magnesite and CaO (r=0.819) and MgO (r=0.835), calcite and CaO (r=0.812), apatite and P20S (r=0.919), and slightly between illite-smectite and K20 (r=0.633) since K20 is allocated to illite- smectite and K-feldspar. Plots illustrated in Figures 3.17 to 3.25 indicate these relationships. 40~------------------------------------------------------. R = 0.767 • • 30 • • • ~ • • !. 20 ë iii • • • • I • • • • • • • • • •• • • 10 ~. •••••. • • • •• •• * ••• • .•~• .•.•... ••; . •• •.• • t O-·~.~------------------------------------------------------~ o 15 30 45 60 Sednorm Quartz (wt"!.) Figure 3.17 - Relationship between normative Quartz and Si02 percentages in coal samples 3 -39 A regression analysis executed in Microsoft Excel proved that the correlation coefficients are almost identical to those obtained from the correlation matrix drawn up in STATISTICA. Since quartz is mainly a minor constituent in the coals, the normative results in Figure 3.17 corresponds exceptionally well, as Si02 is used firstly to form other silicate phases for which there is sufficient amounts of K, Ca, Na, AI, Mg and Fe. 1S~-------------------------------------------------------. • A = 0.933 10 ;;: ~ •• sft • U- • • • S • • • • • •• • • • • • • • . • • • • •• •• •tl..·~•1;#.·.·.~~·'-i· •·•·:·.+ ••••• • • ... • •o~~~L~-·rL_ __ ~~ ~. ~ o 10 20 30 Sednorm Pyrite (wt%) Figure 3.18 - Relationship between normative Pyrite and Fe203 percentages in coal samples The correlation coefficient obtained for Fe203 and siderite in Figure 3.19 is slightly lower than the correlation coefficient for Fe203 and pyrite seen in Figure 3.18. This could be due to the fact that pyrite was more abundant in the coal samples than siderite. Thus, most Fe203 was available for pyrite formation until all S was used, and the remaining Fe203 was assigned to siderite. 3 -40 16~---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------, R = 0.885 • 12 *!s 8 • • uG, • •• • • 4 • #•••• • • • •• • • ..,3'.t....•·...·••...•.• • 0 0 15 30 45 60 75 Sednorm Siderite (wt%) Figure 3.19 - Relationship between normative Siderite and Fe203 percentages in coal samples 1.00 r------------------------------------------------------------------------------, R = 0.835 • 0.80 •• • • • 0.60 'i!- • ! • • 0 • Cl • • • • ::E • • • • 0.40 • • • • •• • •• •• • •• • • •• • • • • • • • • • • •• ••• • • • • • • • 0.00 L- ~ o 1.5 3 4.5 6 7.5 9 Sednorm Magnesite (wt%) Figure 3.20 - Relationship between normative Magnesite and MgO percentages in coal samples 3 -41 Remembering that the normative program was designed mainly for Australian sedimentary rocks, it accommodates magnesite as the dominant Mg-carbonate instead of dolomite which is more prominent in South African coals. Yet, the magnesite percentage in Figure 3.20 is in good agreement with the MgD of which most is supposed to be in the form of dolomite. 18·r---------------------------------------------------------, • R= 0.812 15 12 ~ !. 9 o • al CJ 6 • • • .. • . •: • • 3 • t -•::., ~••.•.• • •• • +. •• • ••• +.\ • I.. ••• ~t~~,~- .....••• • •••••• O~-~··~~--"--------------------------------------------------~ o 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Sednorm Calcite (wt%) Figure 3.21 - Relationship between normative Calcite and CaO percentages in coal samples CaD is used to form calcite before any other Ca-bearing phase confirming the high correlation coefficient of r=0.812 as seen in Figure 3.21. However, dolomite does occur as the dominant carbonate in many coal samples and the correlation between magnesite and CaD (r=0.819) is slightly higher than between calcite and CaD. Therefore, if enough MgD is present, CaD could be consumed by magnesite first. The high correlation between apatite and P20s in Figure 3.22 lies in the fact that it is the only phosphate phase allowed to consume all present phosphorus, and with the presence of sufficient CaD and lower P20s, apatite could be formed until all P20S is used. 3 -42 4,----------------------------------------------------------------------------, R = 0.919 • 3 • • •• • • • • • • • ••• l..lt• .~ .. '\: :.•. O·~~------------------------------------------~----------------------------~ o 10 20 30 40 50 Sednorm Apatite (w1"1o) Figure 3.22 - Relationship between normative Apatite and P20s percentages in coal samples 3.2.3.2 Sediments 2.~.-------------------------------------------------------------------------_, R = 0.779 2.00 • • • • • 1.~ !* • • 0 •.,; 1.00 • • o.so • 0.00 +-------------------------------------------------------------------------~ o 2 4 6 8 10 12 Sednorm K-feldspar (w1"1o) Figure 3.23 - Relationship between normative K-feldspar and K20 percentages in sediment samples 3 -43 The correlation between feldspars and their compounds is best seen in the sediments where abundant K20 and Na20 is present. The correlation between K- feldspar and K20 (as seen in Figure 3.23) and Na20 is r=O.779 and r=O.769, respectively. A good correlation between K20 and illite-smectite (r=O.831) is also observed in Figure 3.25. The correlation between AI203 and kaolinite is also more significant in the sediments (r=O.869) than in the coals as seen in Figure 3.24. This is probably because abundant AI203 is present in the sediments due to the fact that more alumino-silicate phases are present than in the coal, and kaolinite also occur as a dominant phase in the sediments. 40,--------------------------------------------------------, R = 0.869 • 30 • •• • • • •• • • • 10 • • • • • • •• OL-------------------------------------------------------~ o 20 40 60 80 100 Sednorm Kaolinite (wt%) Figure 3.24 - Relationship between normative Kaolinite and AI203 percentages in sediment samples 3-44 2.50 r----------------------------------, R = 0.831 2.00 • • • • • 1.50 ~ ! •• 0~ • • 1.00 • • • • 0.50 • • • • • 0.00 L....- • • • ~ o 4 8 12 16 Sednorm Illite-Smectite (wI%) Figure 3.25 - Relationship between normative Illite-Smectite and K20 percentages in sediment samples The mineralogical composition of coal and coal-bearing units are similar in some instances, although some differences are observed. The ability of this mineralogy to contribute to groundwater character and the influence on ground water owing to a difference in mineralogy is the main objectives of this study, and these possible influences are discussed in the following chapters. 3 -45 CHAPTER4 GEOCHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION AND QUALITY OF COLLIERY WATERS 4.1 Quality of colliery waters The diversity of water use makes this compound imperative to the functional existence of all life forms. Despite its scarcity in various countries, it is still used in numerous processes and operations often resulting in the deterioration of nearby rivers, lakes or groundwater systems. A look at what groundwater systems and other water bodies in and around the mining environment are subjected to provide a brief yet informative explanation of the complexities governing water quality. It would be incorrect to say that the chemical nature of water is influenced only by the entities with which it is in direct contact. Various mechanical factors and constraints in water movement playa significant role. Depending on the type pf ore present, the quality of water in the vicinity of ore deposits might differ considerably to water where no such geological deposits are present. Whether ore deposits are being mined, the manner in which they are mined and the rehabilitation procedures applied after mining has ceased, could result in large differences in water quality regarding such scenarios. The coal mines in the Mpumalanga Province are situated within the Olifants River and Vaal River Catchments as seen in Figure 1.8. Rainwater in the region contains elevated sulphate concentrations, while a rise in salt concentrations is observed in the Loskop Dam. Sulphate anions dominate waters of the Loskop Dam as well as the Witbank and Middelburg Dams (Hodgson and Krantz, 1998). As mentioned in Chapter 1, the weathered and unweathered Ecca Group aquifers are the most significant since the Pre-Karoo aquifers are at great depths and have a low-yielding character in terms of water quantity. The excellent quality of water in the weathered Ecca Group aquifers can be attributed to the many years of dynamic groundwater flow through the weathered sediments. Leachable salts have been removed from the 4 -1 system long ago and it is only the slow decomposition of clay particles which presently releases some elements into the water. Water in the unweathered/fractured aquifer could possibly seep through the No. 2 coal seam, causing higher salt loads there than in the waters of the weathered aquifer; nevertheless acceptable concentrations of various salts ranging between 1 and 400 mg/I are still obtained (Hodgson and Krantz, 1998). With rapid industrial development in the Mpumalanga province, several factors able to contribute to the deteriorating water quality were introduced. Power generation, municipal waste, sewage effluent, metallurgical and agricultural waste are some of the contributors to pollution, but the effects of mining activities seems to be the primary cause for concern regarding water quality, therefore it's influence will be discussed in further detail. Water monitoring systems implemented over the last few decades display some significant results regarding the quality of both surface and underground water surrounding these mines, the key process giving reason for concern being acid mine drainage (AMD). This study was aimed at correlating the water quality in a specific area with the mineralogical composition of the coal and the roof and floor lithologies in that area. In order to illustrate the mineral distribution across such an area, it is necessary to obtain spatial data from a structured, intensive sampling programme. It is not always possible to sample even a smaller area, such as a mine, at regular intervals to gather sufficient information to compile maps. The task was more complicated due to the areal extent of the area investigated. Samples collected from the mines included in this study were often kilometres apart. There are some other constraints that could be unfavourable during sampling procedures. Accessing all lithologies underground in one area is not always possible, resulting in the need for borehole material. It is clear from the research conducted that extensive planning and some modifications were needed to ensure that this specific objective was achieved. A decision was made to concentrate on a mineralogical study with investigations in the acid-base potential of representative samples. Acid-base accounting (ABA) was used mainly to verify the potential of the 4 -2 coal and sediments in the coalfield to contribute to the geochemical character of water, and is laid out in Chapter 5. A brief description of AMD, it's influence on water quality and the factors controlling water quality are provided in the next sections of this chapter. 4.1.1 Sources of acid mine drainage (AMD) Sulphuric acid is formed by the reaction of water with iron sulphides, particularly pyrite, which is a common constituent in coal seams. It may be produced from drainage of mines from which sulphide ores are being extracted, from tailings produced in plants where the ores are processed and through groundwater emerging from abandoned mines charged with sulphuric acid and various salts of metals. Such chemical pollution also includes salts of zinc, lead, arsenic, copper and aluminium (Strahler and Strahler, 1973). The reactions of pyrite with oxygen and water found in literature (Grobbelaar, 2001; Azzie, 1999; Chelin, 2000) proceeds as follows: Step one: The pyrite oxidizes upon contact with air and water 1) 2FeS2 + 7 02 + 2H20 - 4S0/- + 2Fe2++ 4H+ Step two: Iron oxidizes to ferric iron 2) 4Fe2++ 402 + 4H+_ 4Fe3++2H20 Step three: Precipitation occurs with ferric iron to ferric hydroxide 3) Fe3++ 3H20 - Fe(OHh + 3H+ Thus, the overall reaction can be written as: 4FeS2 + 1502 + 14H20 - 8H2S04 + 4Fe(OHh Once acid has been formed it will either remain and accumulate in the rock by filling pores, or be removed by water. Sufficient alkaline material is needed to neutralise AMD conditions depending on the extent of distribution of the acid. The most common acid consuming or neutralising mineral is calcite (CaC03) and neutralisation occurs via the reactions: 4 -3 CaC03 + H+~ Ca2+ + HC03- or CaC03 + 2H+ ~ Ca2+ +H2C03 If acid generation continues long enough to exhaust the neutralising ability of CaC03, the pH will drop and create more favourable conditions for acid generation. The pH of natural waters is controlled by reactions involving an acid-base system, such as the carbonic acid system (Azzie, 1999). Chemical equilibrium models for the study of the carbonic acid system include both an open and a closed system. An open system assumes that the water is in equilibrium with the partial pressure of CO2 in the atmosphere. This model is used when there is ample time for atmospheric carbon dioxide to saturate a solution. For example, this chemical model can be used to study the chemistry of shallow lakes, cooling towers and geological formations. In a closed system the acid-base reactions are much faster than gas dissolution equilibrium reactions (Cruywagen, 2000). Natural systems tend to change relatively rapidly thus no equilibrium with the surrounding atmosphere is attained. The closed system is therefore commonly used in most environmental engineering and environmental science applications (Cruywagen, 2000). When CO2 (9) is brought into contact with water it will dissolve forming carbonic acid (H2C03) until an equilibrium state is reached. The carbonic acid will dissociate to hydrogen, bicarbonate (HC03-) and carbonate (C032-) ions. In an open system the water will be in contact with a gas phase thus carbon dioxide will enter the solution and when the calcite dissolves it is referred to as "open system dissolution". If no gas phase is present, such as below the water table or tailings ponds below the surface, no carbon dioxide will be provided while the calcite dissolves. The solubility of calcite increases within an open system in comparison to a closed system. Dolomite could serve as a neutralising agent for sulphuric acid, but it is less effective than calcite (Cruywagen, 2000). 4 -4 Although very brief, this overview of AMD confirms that the generation and remediation of AMD is a cause for concern regarding most coal mines, as well as other mining sectors; especially since the effects are evident in the deterioration of aquatic and terrestrial life forms surrounding these areas. 4.1.2 The effects of AMD on colliery water quality Research on AMD has gradually intensified since the problem becomes more apparent each year, and similar situations are encountered in coal mines elsewhere. The influence of coal mining methods on water quality is described comprehensively by Hodgson and Krantz (1998). The dissolution of sodium, potassium and chloride-bearing minerals occur simultaneously with the oxidation of pyrite in the spoils of opencast mines. Accelerated pyrite oxidation occurs together with the precipitation of ferric hydroxide. The total sulphur in coal gives little indication of the final pH of the spoil waters. Low sulphur content may still produce acid if insufficient neutralising constituents are present, and when neutralising constituents are depleted, water quality is sure to deteriorate. Water quality in shallow underground mines varies from acid to neutral to saline conditions (Hodgson and Krantz, 1998). In some cases water is not saturated with respect to sulphate due to periodic recharge, while other cases are observed where calcium sulphate dominates waters due to the carbonates in the coal. Low calcium and magnesium concentrations suggest that the base potential has been exhausted, and high metal concentrations are present due to a low pH (Hodgson and Krantz, 1998). Water quantity in deep underground mines varies considerably depending on the mining method used, namely, bord-and-pillar, high extraction, stoping, longwall and shortwall mining. Water quality will be explained in terms of bord-and-pillar and high extraction mining. Interstitial water in bord-and-pillar mines is dominated by sodium and chloride ions, and due to the small load, high concentrations of metals are not present. On the other hand, water in stagnant pools deteriorate due to the high acid generating potential of the coal seam, which often increases once the base potential 4 -5 has been depleted. Natural alkalinity of water that flows into the mine or carbon dioxide from the atmosphere could suffice as a means to buffer acid. Water in high extraction mines is initially high in sodium, but later deteriorates due to pyrite oxidation and an increase in sulphate, calcium and magnesium takes place. Panel waters in such mines have high alkaline tendencies due to available carbonates (Hodgson and Krantz, 1998). Waters from coal mines in other countries show a similar trend. Calcium sulphate type waters characterise abandoned opencast coal mines in Ohio, while magnesium concentrations are often similar to calcium concentrations, and elevated concentrations of sulphate, boron, fluoride and chloride are present (Haefner, 2002). In a study examining sulphate transport and trends as an indicator of drainage from past and present coal mining in the Allegheny and Monongahela River Basins, U. S. A., a comprehensive description of the effects of acid mine drainage is presented. The AMD effects on various rivers and streams in the basins are evident in the deaths of numerous aquatic plants and animals (Sams and Beer, 2000). Similarly, AMD water quality at an opencast coal mine in Indiana was characterised by high acidity, high concentrations of iron, manganese and sulphate, and lack of alkalinity. Remediation processes applied here included the placement of coal ash commonly used for it's alkaline nature to improve AMD conditions (Martin et a/., 1990). These are just a few of many known cases during which improper or no water monitoring programs were implemented resulting in rapid deterioration of water quality. 4 -6 4.2 Factors influencing geochemical character of water From the previous section it is evident that the quality of water is controlled mainly by the degree of water-rock or water-mineral interaction, however, specific parameters are used in determining the suitability of water for a specific purpose. 4.2.1 Electrical conductivity (EC) Conductivity is a numerical expression of the ability of a solution to conduct an electric current, and depends on the concentration of ions, their mobility and valence, as well as temperature. Solutions of inorganic acids, bases and salts are good conductors, while solutions of organic components conduct current very poorly. The physical measurement made in a laboratory determination of conductivity is usually of resistance, measured in 0 or MO, and since the reciprocal for ohm is siemens according to the International System of Units, it is reported as millisiemens per meter (mS/m). There are various uses for conductivity measurements which are carried out in a laboratory such as establishing the degree of mineralisation and the variations in dissolved mineral concentration, just to mention a few. The apparatus consists of different components and the procedure is set out systematically in Franson et al. (1985). 4.2.2 Salinity Salinity is defined as the total solids in water after all carbonates have been converted to oxides, all bromide and iodide have been replaced by chloride, and all organic matter has been oxidised, and is presented as grams per kilogram (g/kg). A specific method for determining salinity in a certain situation is proposed. The electrical conductivity and hydrometric methods are recommended for analyses performed along a shoreline, while the argentometric technique is more suited for laboratory or field analysis of estuarine or coastal inlet waters (Franson et al., 1985). 4 -7 4.2.3 pH value It is possible to describe the acidity, neutrality or alkalinity of an aqueous solution quantitatively by using the hydrogen-ion concentration, but because these concentrations values may be very small it is often more convenient to present them in terms of pH. pH is defined as the negative of the logarithm of the molar hydrogen- ion concentration: It is measured on a scale ranging from 1.00 to 14.00, where 1.00 represents extreme acidity, 7.00 represents neutral and 14.00 would be purely alkaline or basic. Water quality is often characterised in terms of its alkalinity or acidity as this parameter is very dependant on ion concentration (Ebbing, 1993). 4.2.4 Total suspended solids (TSS) and total dissolved solids (TOS) Solids refer to the matter suspended or dissolved in water or wastewater. The degree to which solids are suspended and dissolved in water contributes to it's suitability for industrial and domestic use. During an analytical procedure, the "total solids" is a measure of residue left after the evaporation of a sample and includes total suspended solids (the portion of solids retained by a filter) and total dissolved solids (the portion that passes through the filter). The concentration of solids is presented as milligram per litre (mg/L). Recommended methods are also set out in Franson et al. (1985). 4.2.5 Metals Most metals occurring naturally in a certain environment tend to concentrate in nearby streams, rivers and lakes, depending on their abundance, mobility and the minerals in which they occur. In areas where geological bodies containing prominent concentrations of a specific metal are situated, elevated concentrations of the metals associated with the orebody are commonly found in the surrounding environment. This is a useful indicator in determining the location of ore deposits. The exploitation 4 -8 of such a deposit would often result in a higher concentration of metals in the area, but mainly in the water bodies, generally having a negative effect on the water quality. Several analytical techniques are available in determining the distribution of metals in surface and ground water. Calcium, magnesium, iron and manganese are commonly analysed in groundwater from coal mines as these ions are donated by the carbonates, sulphides and silicates present in the coals and sedimentary rocks. They also determine the suitability of water for use in mining operations. Calcium is dissolved from minerals such as calcite and gypsum, and forms soluble salts with bicarbonate, sulphate, fluoride, phosphate and chromate. The main source of magnesium is dolomite but it is associated with silicates, sulphates and chlorides. Both calcium and magnesium are responsible for water hardness, and calcium also reduces metal toxicity by hindering their absorption (Azzie, 1999). Acidic surface drainage and some underground water sources frequently contain higher iron concentrations. Iron may occur in true solution, in a colloidal state, in inorganic or organic iron complexes, or in coarse suspended particles. It is obtained from sulphides, carbonates, oxides and hydroxides, and some silicates. The ionic state of iron present in a solution depends primarily on it's surrounding Eh and pH conditions. Different procedures are thus used for the determination of ferrous and ferric iron (Franson et aI., 1985). Manganese is found in solution predominantly as the manganous ion Mn2 4+. On oxidation to the manganic ion, Mn +, manganese tends to precipitate out of solution to form a black hydrated oxide, which causes staining problems often associated with manganese-bearing waters (Azzie, 1999). On precipitation, iron and manganese contribute to the sediment deposits that pollute heat exchangers and pipelines. These metals are presented as milligrams per litre (mg/L). 4.2.6 Inorganic non-metallic constituents Chloride, sulphate and silica are primary inorganic non-metallic constituents used to characterise water. An excessive chloride concentration gives water a typical salty 4 -9 taste depending on the concentration, in mg/L, and on other cations present. High chloride content may harm metallic pipes and structures, as well as growing plants. Silica is obtained from quartz and other silicate minerals, and occurs as suspended particles, in a colloidal state and as silicate ions. The silicate content of natural water ranges from 1 to 30 mg/L. For industrial uses elevated concentrations are undesirable as silica scales are difficult to remove from equipment. Mine drainage contributes large amounts of sulphate through pyrite oxidation, but also through the dissolution of minerals such as gypsum (Franson et al., 1985). High concentrations of sulphate may promote degradation of concrete structures. Determination of these constituents is vital and a range of methods are available for this purpose. 4.2.7 Organic constituents The total organic carbon (TOC), the biochemical oxygen demand (BOC) and the chemical oxygen demand (COD) are used as parameters in characterising colliery waters. Carbon compounds in water can be oxidised by biological and chemical processes, and the BOC and COD characterise these fractions, respectively. Although it does not provide the same information, TOC is a more convenient and direct expression of total organic carbon content. Organic matter promotes the formation of microbial slimes, acting as a nutrient source for bacterial growth (Azzie, 1999). The components characterising water quality are introduced into the system by means of various reactions and processes such as redox reactions, acid-base reactions, ion exchange, dissolution-precipitation and aqueous speciation. For more information regarding these processes the reader is referred to Hodgson and Krantz (1998). 4 -10 4.3 A model for the preliminary assessment of sources of pollution Taking precautionary measures to curb deterioration in groundwater quality is always a feasible approach to prevent such a situation from developing into a crisis. Yet, negative influences on water surrounding mines are sometimes only detected once conditions have already reached detrimental levels. Since monitoring water quality has become an integral part of operating a mine, more knowledge has been gathered concerning the causes, effects and solutions associated with water problems. It is necessary to understand unfavourable reactions that are associated with specific mine wastes and by-products, and how they affect the surrounding environment. Therefore, examining the potential of any source to contribute to pollution could be cost-effective and beneficial, as time and resources spent on remediation often amounts to vast quantities. As seen from equations above, pyrite weathering eventually results in iron oxyhydroxide precipitation resulting in a greater net acid production. However, minewater often achieves equilibrium due to forward and reverse reactions occurring at a similar pace. Minerals such as carbonates and aluminosilicates also consume acidity and helps buffer pH. According to data presented by Banwart and Malmstrom (2001), calcite dissolves 3 orders-of-magnitude quicker than pyrite, which in turn dissolves nearly 3 order-of magnitude quicker than aluminosilicates as observed in Figure 4.1. If these minerals are present in similar quantities, calcite will produce sufficient alkalinity to neutralise the acidity produced by the pyrite until it is depleted (Figure 4.2). Once calcite is depleted the acidity level will be determined by the weathering rates of pyrite and the silicates. Although the discharge might remain near-neutral throughout the lifetime of the calcite, the lifetime of pyrite corresponds to the contaminating lifetime of a site (Banwart and Malmstrom, 2001). On the other hand, this would only be partially true since the calcite depletion rate would be largely dependent on the pyrite oxidation rate due to the required neutralisation. Secondly, once you have submergence with water the conditions will become progressively less oxic, thus the pyrite reaction rate decreases. 4 -11 The mineral behaviour explained above formed the basis of a hydrochemical model for the preliminary assessment of minewater pollution proposed by Banwart and Malmstrom (2001). It was aimed at classifying a site in terms of the potential threat to the environment. The model estimates the contamination strength of the source, longevity and possible future changes in discharge quality. Firstly, the current mineral weathering rates are estimated by setting up an integrated mass-balance based on the water budget (including surface and groundwater flows), the associated water qualities and the yield from the present contaminant load (source strength). It is then possible to calculate the flow (mol S-1) of a contaminant due to a process in a rock or ore deposit, by observing various water flows to and from the deposit and the contaminant concentration. This only applies for steady state water flow conditions i.e. once a mine has filled and the inflow from recharge and groundwater influx is being balanced by decanting and seepage. Figure 4.1 - Surface area dissolution rates for source minerals far from solubility equilibrium at oxic conditions and pH 5 and 25°C (Banwart and Malmstrom, 2001) 4 -12 Certain reaction products also provide evidence of specific weathering processes. The flow a reaction product is related to the rate of the weathering process which is calculated in mol S-1. Having obtained the weathering rat~ an estimation of the duration of the weathering reaction is obtained by calculating the lifetime of the mineral in the deposit. The amount of the mineral is determined by areal extent and depth of the source as well as on the composition of the rock and ore in it. This mineral content could be estimated using chemical analysis and thin sections. Now it is possible to predict the present acidity load, the neutralising potential and the lifetime of further acid generating conditions (Banwart and Malmstrom, 2001 ). /" Duration of 6 - contamination Calcite _ .. ........ lifetime. .. ~ ..5 ........ Pyrite lifetime .. 4 - 3 • 2 I __lI I 'teal 'tpyr Figure 4.2 - Relationship between trends in pH with the lifetime of minerals that produce and consume acidity (Banwart and Malmstrom, 2001) Some results were obtained when the model was applied to a mine rock waste deposit located in the northern part of Sweden, a flooded abandoned coal mine with deep workings in northern England and a mine tailings deposit also situated in the northern part of Sweden. For the rock waste deposit it was predicted that the acid levels would be controlled by relative rates of sulphide and silicate mineral weathering since depletion of calcite prior to pyrite was expected. Acidic conditions would also exist after depletion of calcite in the abandoned coal mine. Although the lifetimes of both pyrite and calcite/dolomite in the tailings dumps were within the order of 100 years, the estimated lifetime of chalcopyrite was in the order of thousands of years, implying the need for long-term remediation (Banwart and Malmstrom, 2001). 4 -13 CHAPTER 5 ACID-BASE ACCOUNTING Acid-base accounting used to predict the acid and neutralising potential of samples analysed in this study. The technique makes it possible to quantify the potential of a sample to produce acidic or alkaline conditions. A detailed explanation of the experimental procedure followed can be found in Hodgson and Krantz (1998), Cruywagen (2000) and Usher et al. (2001). The procedure applied to the samples in this study is briefly set out in Appendix 3 and includes the raw data. 5.1 Acid-base determinations for the Witbank and Highveld Coalfields Acid mine drainage results from the interactions of certain sulphide minerals with oxygen, water, and bacteria. Pyrite is recognised as the major source of acidic drainage. The acid potential (AP) is a measure of the potential of a sample to generate acidity according to the following reaction: The amount of calcite required to neutralise a given amount of acid mine drainage depends on the behaviour of CO2 during neutralisation and on the pH reached. If the AMD is to be neutralised to pH 6.3 or above, then the following reaction may be written: For each mole of pyrite that is oxidised, two moles of calcite are required for acid neutralisation. On a mass ratio basis, for each gram of sulphur present, 3.125g of calcite is required for acid neutralisation. When expressed in parts per thousand of spoil, for each 10 ppt of sulphur present, 31.25 ppt of calcite is required for acid neutralisation. 5 -1 The stoichiometry in the previous equation is based on the exsolving of carbon dioxide gas out of the spoil system. In a closed system (as described in Chapter 4), carbon dioxide is not exsolved, and additional acidity from carbonic acid is generated. Cravotta et al. (1990) proposed that up to four moles of calcite might be needed for acid neutralisation as follows: The stoichiometry of equation above shows that twice as much calcite would be required for acid neutralisation. On a mass basis, for each 10 ppt of sulphur present, 62.5 tons of calcite is needed for acid neutralisation in one thousand tons of spoil (Cravotta et aI., 1990). Results obtained from the laboratory experimental procedure are used in calculating the AP, neutralising potential (NP) and net neutralising potential (NNP) as follows: AP = S04 (mg/L)/weight (g) x ml H20 or H202 = kg SOJt of sample 1000 AP (Open) (CaC03 kg/t) = S04 kg/t x 50 48 NP (CaC03 kg/t) = (N H2S04 x ml acid) - (N NaOH x ml alkali)/weight (g) x 50 Thus, the NNP is determined by subtracting the acid potential from the neutralising potential. NNP (Open) = NP - AP (Open) In a closed system, AP (Closed) = AP (Open) x 2, and, NNP (Closed) = NP - AP (Closed) (Hodgson and Krantz, 1998). There are various types of screening criteria used to interpret ABA results. According to Usher et al. (2001), an integration of Net Acid Generating Test (NAG) pH, Net Neutralising Potential (NNP), Neutralising Potential Ratio (NPR), and %S and NPR, 5 -2 could lead to a good classification of test results. The reader is referred to Cruywagen (2000) for a comprehensive description of the NAG procedure. The NAG pH obtained from this procedure can serve as a rough guideline as follows: • If final pH = >5.5; the sample is non-acid generating, • If final pH is between 3.5 and 5.5; the sample is low risk acid generating, • If the final pH = <3.5; the sample is high risk acid generating. When using the NNP as screening criteria, research has shown that there is a range from -20 to 20 kg/t CaC03 where a sample can become acidic or remain neutral. Thus, a sample with a NNP <20 is potentially acid generating and a sample with a NNP >20 might not generate acid (Usher et aI., 2001). The NPR, or NP: AP, is the ratio between the acid and neutralising potential. It ranges from <1:1 which suggests likely AMD generation to >4:1 suggesting no potential for AMD. By combining the NPR with the sulphide percentage, another set of rules can be derived as follows: • Samples with less than 0.3% sulphide-S are regarded as having insufficient oxidisable sulphide-S to sustain acid generation. • NPR ratios of >4:1 are considered to have enough neutralising capability, while NPR ratios between 3: 1 and 1:1 are inconclusive. • NPR ratios of <1:1 with more than 0.3% sulphide-S are potentially acid generating (Usher et aI., 2001). 5.1.1 The Witbank Coalfield Data from 64 rock and coal samples was available in this coalfield. The raw data found in Appendix 3 is organised according to lithologies ranging from below the No. 1 seam at the bottom of the dataset, to above the NO.5 seam at the top. Although the dataset is limited, averages were used to illustrate the vertical distribution of acid and neutralising potentials in the coalfield. 5 -3 Initial and Final pH SSeam 5104 4SeamU~~~~~~~~----~.~~~~~~~~-~--~-----~----~- ~~~~~---..,------r----. 4SeamPT ~~~~~~~,..~--~-----~- lSeam .------- .. -- .. --.--.-- ... --. 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 pH Figure 5.1 - Initial and final pH of the samples before and after complete pyrite oxidation and carbonate dissolution From Figure 5.1 it is apparent that the natural or initial pH of both rock and coal samples are close to alkaline or at least to neutral conditions. With the exception of the No. 5 seam all of the lithological units are expected to remain at these pH conditions if no oxidation takes place. A possible reason for the initial pH of the No.5 seam being much lower could be because it is situated closer to the water table. Any reactions that might have taken place could be due to groundwater movement through the seam dissolving most of the carbonates. The final pH of all lithologies indicates that acidic conditions would dominate if complete sulphide oxidation was to occur. No. 5 seam also has a lower final pH suggesting that total available carbonates could already be leached out leaving less sources of alkalinity to buffer the acid. It could also be that acid producing constituents were originally more abundant than acid consuming constituents. 5 -4 Acid Potential Above 5 =:::J I I I II 5Seam I ) 5 to 4 I I 4SeamU I 4SeamPT =:J 4SeamL LDAP(OP:'- 4 to 2 I , I 2Seam 2 to t P tSeam I ). Below t P I 0.00 io.oo 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 80.00 90.00 KgA Figure 5.2 - Acid potential (for an open system) for the Witbank Coalfield The AP in an open system is illustrated in Figure 5.2 above. Since the acid potential is determined primarily by the percentage of sulphur present it can be concluded that the rock units contain low concentrations acid producing minerals such as pyrite. This is evident in XRD interpretations, and is supported by XRF analyses and normative calculations as explained in Chapter 3. Mineralogical investigations also proved that coals contained larger quantities of pyrite, thus the AP of the coal units are higher. The acid potential for No. 5 and No. 4 Upper seams both indicate that sulphides are very abundant in the seams. However, the NO.5 seam has a negative NP as seen in Figure 5.3, thus very few neutralising constituents are present in this seam. From interpretations in Chapter 3, the seam contained only minor quantities of calcite and dolomite, and very low CaO and MgO concentrations were obtained in XRF results, which is in good agreement with it's NP. NO.4 Upper seam on the other hand contains a larger NP and will thus have a stronger buffering ability. This is also confirmed by XRF results showing CaO concentrations averaging at 2.27 wt%. 5 -5 Neutralising Potential Above 5 I ~ SSeam I I 5t04 ,l f 4SeamU I 4SeamPT 0 I I I I 4SeamL I 4t02 ~ I I I I 2Seam I 2 to 1 j I I I I I I 1Seam j I Below1 f===J I I -5.00 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 KgIt Figure 5.3 - Neutralising potential for the Witbank Coalfield Although neutralising constituents are present in all the lithological units, Figure 5.4 clearly illustrates that the acid potential for both open and closed systems exceeds the neutralising potential by excessive quantities. Only between No. 1 and No. 2 seams would sufficient alkalinity be provided to buffer acidity. CaO and MgO concentrations are not high enough in the roof rocks of the No.1 seam and the floor rocks of No.2 seam to clarify this neutralising potential completely. The presence of feldspars and other aluminosilicates would contribute to the neutralising potential even if it occurs at a slower rate (Banwart and Malmstrom, 2001). However, actual acid and neutralisation release rates cannot be predicted with the technique, neither can the completeness of the reaction be assessed (Cruywagen, 2000). Thus, the pyrite reaction rate has to be very slow in order for the system to be brought back to neutral conditions by feldspars and aluminosilicates once the acidification has already occurred. Even though the neutralising potential is low, pyrite seldom occurs in this unit; therefore little neutralising potential is required. 5 -6 Acid and Neutralising Potential Above 5 o SSeam 5 t04 b 4SeamU aNP 4SeamPT aAP (Open) 4SeamL 4 t02 l ·AP (Closed) I 2Seam 1 2to 1 E:i 1Seam Below 1 ~I -20.00 0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00 160.00 180.00 KgIt Figure 5.4 - Acid potential (for an open and closed system) and neutralising potential for the Witbank Coalfield Net Neutralising Potential Above 5 SSeam I 5 to 4 4SeamU a NNP (Open) 1 I I I 4SeamPT• NNP (Closed) J 4SeamL4to 22Seam 2 to 1 1Seam Below 1 -180.00 -160.00 -140.00 -120.00 -100.00 -80.00 -60.00 -40.00 -20.00 0.00 20.00 KgIt Figure 5.5 - Net neutralising potential for the Witbank Coalfield 5 -7 Acid-base accounting data on these coalfields has been generated by the Institute for Groundwater Studies at the UFS and are often presented as case studies in reports such as the Water Research Commission Reports. In many cases interpretations from results predict that water quality in and surrounding the coal mines in the Witbank and Highveld coalfields will probably become acidic due to the environmental circumstances as well as rock and coal mineralogy. This investigation was a confirmation that lithological units will contribute greatly and negatively to the water quality in the area, unless remediation programs are implemented. A negative NNP is observed in Figure 5.5 for all lithological units except between the NO.1 and No. 2 seams. The more negative the NNP becomes, the more CaC03 per ton of spoil will have to be added to neutralise the acidity. NNP vs Acid Potential Above 5 I I I~ SSeam 5t04 I I ,..c:::::: 4SeamU I I I I aNNP(Open) 4SeamPT ~ , aAP (Open) I I • NNP (Closed)4SeamL ! I a AP (Closed) 4to 2 I I I 2Seam I I ! I I 2 to 1 I ~ I Seam ! I I Below 1 ! I I ~ ·180.00 ·160.00 -140.00 -120.00 -100.00 -80.00 -60.00 -40.00 -20.00 0.00 20.00 KgIt Figure 5.6 - Acid potential (for an open and closed system) and net neutralising potential (for an open and closed system) for the Witbank Coalfield The constant decrease in the AP, NP and NNP in depth is very obvious and possibly due to a lack of circulating groundwater, therefore a lack of leaching of reactive species in the lower units. Although sulphur increased or decreased in a specific direction horizontally in a seam, no exact distribution was noted vertically for a 5 -8 borehole or for the dataset as a whole. Sulphur percentages were extremely variable and within ranges of 0.01 to as much as 20 wt% of a sample. A similar situation is observed for calcium. However, from the ABA results a trend in vertical distribution might exist. A multiple regression analysis performed on these samples showed that the sulphur percentage is 95% accountable for the NNP. Figure 5.6 illustrates this influence. The AP is plotted as a negative value in order for a comparison to be made. For most units the NNP is almost equivalent to or slightly less than the AP. A negative NNP indicates the inability of a sample to provide sufficient neutralising constituents to buffer the acid produced, or stated otherwise, the acid produced was present in larger quantities than the alkalinity. In this study, the negative NNP corresponds well to the AP, thus the neutralising potential was quite insufficient. 6.00 ,--------------------------------, R = 0.901 • 5.00 4.00 ae ":ás 3.00 • :; '" • 2.00 • I • • • •1.00 +~..••• ,. . •... • 0.00 ~*------------------------------l 0.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00 300.00 350.00 400.00 Acid Potential (Open) (Kg/t) Figure 5.7 - Acid potential (for an open system) and sulphur % Good correlations between the AP and S %, and NP and CaO % can be seen in Figures 5.7 and 5.8 respectively. The sulphur obtained from XRF analyses is in good agreement with the AP (Open) as seen in Figure 5.7 (r = 0.901). Correlations for Fe203 and AP were insignificant, possibly due to the fact that most of the Fe203 was not present as pyritic Fe203 but as FeC03 or in montmorillonite, as concluded in 5 -9 Chapter 3. Neither was there any noteworthy correlation between normative pyrite and AP. 7.00 A = 0.929 • 6.00 5.00 4.00 • ;/!. 0 lO 0 • 3.00 • • • • • •2.00 • • • • • • • 1.00 • ~~.•,• 0.00 ~~--~---~---~----------------~ 0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00 Neutralising Potential (KgIt) Figure 5.8 - Neutralising potential and CaO % A significant correlation was obtained for the NP and CaD % (r = 0.929) (Figure 5.8) as well as the combined CaD and MgD % (r=0.906) and the NP. An insignificant correlation was observed between the NP and MgO% (r=0.395), and between the NP and normative calcite (r=0.634) and dolomite (r=0.612). Table 5-1: Average NPR (NP: AP) ratio and NNP for lithological units of the Witbank Coalfield (open system) Samples NP:AP NNP Above 5 0.973 -0.15 5 Seam -0.037 -77.97 5 to 4 0.268 -11.85 4 SeamU 0.333 -56.32 4 SeamPT 0.637 -0.78 4 SeamL 0.786 -7.50 4 to 2 0.020 -24.46 2 Seam 0.704 -9.55 2 to 1 3.355 10.84 1 Seam 0.606 -10.49 Below 1 0.553 -1.81 5 -10 This could mean that the NP is more dependant on the calcite concentration than the dolomite concentration, or that calcite, and not dolomite, is the dominant reacting carbonate species available for neutralisation. According to the screening criteria proposed by Usher et al. (2001), averages for NPR in Table 5-1 suggest that most lithological units are potentially acid generating. The unit the No. 1 and No. 2 coal seams are considered to be inconclusive. The average NNP values in Table 5-1, however, suggest that only NO.5 coal seam, NO.4 Upper coal seam, and between NO.4 and No. 2 coal seams are potentially acid generating. The other units could become either acidic or neutral. In a case study presented by Usher et al. (2001) a comparable scenario for Optimum Opencast Colliery in the Witbank Coalfield is observed. The lithological units were sampled in a similar manner to that in this study. An excess of AP over NP was present. The upper units had the lowest NP and AP. Since carbonates are more reactive than sulphides, leaching by circulating groundwater occurred in the upper units giving rise to a lower neutralisation potential. A higher NP was also observed for the unit between No. 2 and No. 4 coal seams due to the lack of carbonate leaching with depth. For a detailed explanation of the techniques applied and test conducted on this colliery the reader is referred to Usher et al. (2001). The case study is in agreement with the findings in this study, which includes samples from other areas of the Witbank Coalfield as well. 5.1.2 The Highveld Coalfield Limited acid-base accounting data was available for this coalfield, yet from the data for NO.4 and NO.5 seams tabulated in Appendix 3, it seems that the same situation could be expected as in the Witbank Coalfield. The highest negative NNP values are also observed for the coal seams. Values range from approximately -156.14 to - 25.66 kg/t. 5 -11 Table 5-2: Average NPR (NP: AP) ratio and NNP for lithological units of the Highveld Coalfield (open system) Samples NP:AP NNP Above 5 0.004 -110.68 5 Seam -0.012 -156.14 5 to 4 0.005 -32.29 4Seam 0.244 -38.31 Below 4 0.006 -25.66 The average NPR ratios and NNP as seen in Table 5-2 suggest that these samples have potential to generate acid. By observations made from this data significant predictions can be made as to the influence mineralogy might have on the surrounding groundwater. The potential for these lithological units to contribute to the deterioration of groundwater is definitely evident. This method is, however, based on ideal situations where it is assumed that complete oxidation of sulphides and dissolution of carbonates will occur. The presence of these constituents does not necessarily guarantee their availability, which is often dependant on the minerals in which certain elements are contained, as well as geochemical factors such as pH, Eh and temperature. Secondly, the method does not take rates of weathering and oxidation into account. Thus, the prediction is more relevant when ideal conditions exist. The sulphur analysed represents total S. This would include the sulphide-S, sulphate-S and organic-So The only sulphide detected by XRD interpretations during this study was pyrite. No sulphate phases were present in these interpretations, and it was not possible to determine the organic sulphur content with XRF techniques. The S concentration therefore accounts for the sulphide-S and the organic-So In theory it is possible to calculate the AP from the analysed S by multiplying the S value by 31 .25 from the calculations explained in section 5.1. Assuming that all sulphide-S is available for oxidation, then the total S analysed could be used to predict the AP for samples on which no acid-base determinations has been carried out. The correlation between the XRF S and the AP confirms that there is a good relationship between these components for the sample set as a whole. 5 -12 Regarding the NP, the CaO analysed includes Ca from all Ca-bearing phases such as montmorillonite, dolomite, fluorapatite, crandallite, and the major Ca-phase, calcite. The excellent correlation between the NP and CaO, and between the NP and combined CaO and MgO, confirms that these chemical components are largely responsible for NP values. It is then also possible to predict the NP by using the CaO and MgO concentrations for samples for which no AP or NP data is available. The mineralogy therefore provides an alternative for determining acid and base potentials in the event that no ABA tests are available, and could be used to verify the accuracy of ABA analyses. The application of ABA in this study offered a major contribution to understanding the complexities governing water-rock interactions. The time involved in such interactions often amounts to decades and even centuries. Nonetheless, interpretation of ABA data not only provides a preview of situations that might arise regarding groundwater quality in a certain area, but also offers ample time to decide on appropriate prevention or remediation programs. 5 -13 CHAPTER 6 DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS XRF and XRD analyses were conducted on various coal and sediment samples from the Witbank and Highveld Coalfields with the aim to improve our understanding of the mineralogy and geochemistry of these coals and coal-bearing units. Samples were collected from the NO.1, NO.2, NO.4 and NO.5coal seams, as well as their roof and floor lithologies. Different preparation and analytical procedures were applied to determine the differences that exist between the available methods. Low-temperature ashing and X-ray diffraction carried out on some samples by the University of New South Wales accentuated the need and practicality of integrating other techniques with XRD. X- ray diffraction on LTA coals proved to be accurate in identifying minerals that occur as rare constituents, especially since the organic material in coal tends to obscure interpretations from raw coal XRD, but artefacts were also produced during the process. There are numerous variables influencing the results from XRF analyses on coals. Differences were observed between whole coal and fusion disk XRF results. The calcination and fusion of coal samples introduce some difficulties concerning the loss of important constituents in coal, such as sulphur and possibly phosphorus. Thick powder briquettes were prepared (Appendix 1) to prevent X-rays from passing through the coal briquettes. Mass absorption is accounted for in fusion disks by the addition of La203 during preparation (Spectroflux 105) and by matrix corrections. The high temperature determination of the LOl can lead to the loss of inorganic constituents resulting in errors. The differences between whole coal results of mixed proportions of two samples are attributed to variations in sampling and mixing. The possibility of segregation of heavy minerals in samples during mixing and storage has also been considered, and was contained by careful sample handling and thorough mixing. The standard XRF 6 -1 preparation technique is recognised as precise and reliable, but in this case whole coal analysis was deemed more suitable. During XRD interpretations the mineral components in coal were expressed as a percentage of the inorganic constituents. The inorganic fraction consisted primarily of dominant quartz and kaolinite, and sometimes even dominant pyrite, calcite and dolomite. The latter three were almost ubiquitous in the coals. The Ca-phosphate mineral, crandallite was detected in the western region of the Witbank and Highveld Coalfields (Chapter 3). Although only present in low concentrations, fluorapatite was detected throughout in the Witbank coals except in the extreme northeastern region. This mineral was not present in the Highveld coals. Chemical analyses confirmed the mineralogical interpretations. The inorganic components make up approximately 8.00 to 35.00 wt% of a coal sample. SiOz concentrations varied between 0.00 and 35.00 wt% of a sample, Alz03 between 0.50 and 16.00 wt%, FeZ03 between 0.03 and 10.00 wt%, and S between 0.15 and 8.00 wt%. Samples that contained quartz as a dominant mineral in XRD patterns corresponded well with the SiOz concentrations in the chemical analyses. Alz03 was represented mainly by kaolinite, and sometimes traces of montmorillonite and illite. Since siderite was not common in the XRD patterns of coal samples, pyrite accounted for FeZ03 and S concentrations in the chemical analyses. Yet, an access of FeZ03 over S was present suggesting that minor to accessory phases containing FeZ03 (such as montmorillonite, siderite, hematite and goethite) might not have been detected in the XRD interpretations. Minor concentrations of CaO (0.00 to 8.00 wt%) and MgO (0.00 to 1.00 wt%) were present. CaO was mainly accounted for by calcite and dolomite, while the presence of major dolomite concentrations in XRD interpretations explained elevated MgO values in the chemical analyses. PzOs, which occurred in concentrations of 0.00 to 3.50 wt%, was highest in samples containing fluorapatite and crandallite as major to minor phases. KzO was in the order of 0.00 to 1.30 wt%, and only elevated in samples containing minor illite and feldspar concentrations. Similarly, NazO values were the lowest varying between 0.00 and 0.45 wt%. The only difference in 6 -2 chemistry between Witbank and Highveld coals was a slight increase in Na20 (0.00 to 0.51 wt%) in the Highveld coals. The distribution of element oxides is best observed across the NO.2 coal seam since a sufficient database was available for noting trends. As seen in Chapter 3, particular trends exist in the mineralogical distribution as well as in the oxide distribution. An integration of mineralogical interpretations and chemical analyses confirms that Si02, Ti02, A1203,Na20 and K20 concentrations are elevated in the northeastern corner of the Witbank Coalfield, and decreases in a south-westerly direction. This corresponds with the mineralogy since samples containing dominant quartz and kaolinite are also found in the northeastern region. As mentioned in Chapter 2, these minerals could be of detrital or authigenic origin. Quartz could be provided by the influx of material from sources to the north of the coalfields, while kaolinite could have been formed due to the alteration of feldspars, or supplied as detrital material. S decreases towards the eastern parts of the coalfield, while Fe203 is highest in the northern region. Similar to the S distribution, pyrite also is highest in the west suggesting that the Fe203 concentration is dominated by other Fe-bearing phases. CaO, MgO and P20Sshow similar distribution to that of S. Although such trends were not clearly discernible in other seams due to insufficient data, a comparable distribution could exist. The coal-bearing units of the Vryheid Formation consists of sandstones, siltstones and carbonaceous shales, and in some areas, mudstones are present. There are some slight yet noteworthy variations in chemical composition of the rock types throughout the stratigraphic units. From the XRD interpretations in Chapter 3 it was concluded that the mineralogy of the sedimentary rocks consisted of quartz and kaolinite as dominant minerals, illite and siderite as minor constituents, and calcite, dolomite and pyrite as major to accessory components. Sandstone samples display a dominating silicate chemistry combined with considerable elevations in AI203 ranging from 1.00 to 20.00 wt% of a sample. As with the coals, quartz accounted for most Si02 in chemical analyses, 6 -3 while high AI203 was represented by abundant kaolinite and illite in the XRD patterns. As expected, Ab03 concentrations were higher in siltstones (10.00 to 25.00 wt%) and the highest in the shales averaging at 20.00 wt%, along with a decrease in Si02. Fe203 (0.50 to >4.00 wt%) and S (0.05 to >2.00 wt%) concentrations were higher in siltstone samples; however, these elements were elevated in sandstones in some instances. Correspondingly, pyrite was abundant in siltstones. Siderite confirmed major Fe203 concentrations in sandstones samples. CaO and MgO where only elevated in rock samples containing reasonable amounts of calcite and dolomite. Higher K20 and Na20 concentrations especially in the sandstones were evident in both coalfields and were supported by the presence of feldspars and clays such as illite in XRD interpretations. The normative program used to calculate the mineralogy from the chemical analyses was used to compare the XRD interpretations as discussed in Chapter 3. Good correlations exist between the normative mineralogy and the chemical composition for minerals such as pyrite and S% (r=0.885), calcite and CaO% (r=0.812), kaolinite and A1203% (r=0.869), and apatite and P205% (r=0.919). It is' concluded that an integration of such a program with XRF analysis and XRD interpretation methods could improve the accuracy and confidence with which results are produced. Acid-base accounting was applied in this investigation in the prediction water quality and the implementation of proper remediation programs. Based on the discussions in Chapter 5, ABA results for these samples show that the lithological units in the coalfields possess the ability to contribute to deterioration in ground and surface water quality in the surrounding area. The mineralogy of the coal seams and the rock units contributes to this potential to produce acid mine drainage conditions. Although it might take as much as centuries, it can be concluded that all coal seams and rock units will produce acidity and alkalinity simultaneously. Two types of screening criteria was used to determine whether acid or alkaline conditions will prevail once all acid consuming and acid producing minerals has been oxidised. From the NNP, or net neutralising potential, it can be predicted that the No.5 coal seam, the No.4 coal seam and the unit between No.2 6 -4 and No.4 coal seams will be predominantly acidic. The NNP of the other units vary between -20 kg/t and 20 kg/t, therefore these stratigraphic units could become either acidic or alkaline. The unit between No. 1 and No. 2 coal seams is the only unit possessing enough neutralising potential to buffer the acid produced, but could still become acid since the NNP is less than 20 kg/t. The NPR or NP: AP ratios, for all stratigraphic units (except between No.1 and No.2 coal seams) are less than 1:1 suggesting that acid conditions will dominate. The NPR ratio between No.1 and No.2 coal seams is at least 3:1 implying that enough buffering capacity is available to counteract the acid. The AP and NP are largely dependant on the presence of pyrite and calcite, respectively. Good correlations were obtained between the NP and CaO% (r=0.929) and the AP and S% (r=0.901); therefore it is possible to use the mineralogy to predict these factors. It should also be remembered that these predictions do not take time and weathering rates into consideration, thus such conditions will only be obtained once ideal situations are reached, as discussed in Chapter 5. The distribution of minerals and abundance of reacting mineral species in the coalfields can also be used to predict acidification and neutralisation in a certain area. Since pyrite is highest in the western part of the coalfield, it could be expected that acid conditions are more likely to occur in this region. The availability of carbonates will provide buffering capacity, but, from Chapter 5 it is evident that insufficient carbonates are available for long term neutralisation. Clay minerals and other aluminosilicates are abundant in the northern region where less acid producing species available. These minerals, together with the carbonates, might have a greater influence on the neutralising potential in the northeastern region, since less acid producing species are available here. The occurrence and modal distribution of mineral phases is illustrated in Chapter 3, although the mining areas included in the study were not adequate enough to obtain a representative amount of samples to justify the magnitude of the region. An extensive collection was obtained for the No.2 coal seam as well as for the No.4 coal seam. 6 -5 Compiling regional maps showing the distribution or trends in mineralogy and an overall interpretive map in terms of acid generating potential based solely on mineralogy, was also included as one of the project objectives. This mineralogical distribution is very well illustrated for the No. 2 coal seam and clear trends are observed. Acid-base accounting data generated from this study will assist in terms of making plausible predictions concerning the potential of the coal and rocks in the Witbank and Highveld Coalfields to contribute to acid mine drainage. This investigation has led to a better understanding of the coals and their roof and floor lithologies in the study area, and the use of this information in future applications will be a benefit, especially to the mining industry. 6 -6 REFERENCES Azzie, B. A. (1999). The geochemistry and quality of water from selected collieries on the South African Highveld. M.Sc thesis (unpubl.), University of Cape Town, South Africa, 181 pp. Azzie, B. A. (2002). Coal mine waters in South Africa: Their geochemistry, quality and classification. Ph.D thesis (unpubl.), University of Cape Town, South Africa, 480pp. Banwart, S. A. and Malmstrom, M. E. (2001). Hydrochemical modelling for preliminary assessment of minewater pollution. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 74,73-97. Bates, R. L. and Jackson, J. A. (eds.) (1980). Glossary of Geology Second Edition. American Geological Institute, 751pp. Bouska, V. (1981). Geochemistry of coal. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Netherlands, 284pp. Buhrnann, C. and Buhrnann, D. (1988). Sedimentary petrology of coal-bearing Ecca sediments. Final Project Report (unpubl.), University of Natal, South Africa, 27pp. Cadle, A. B., Cairncross, B., Christie, A. D. M. and Roberts, D. L. (1990). The Permo-Triassic coal-bearing deposits of the Karoo Basin, southern Africa. Economic Geology Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 218, 38pp. Cairncross, B. (2001). An overview of the Permian (Karoo) coal deposits of southern Africa. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 33, 529-562. Catuneanu, 0., Hancox, P. J. and Rubidge, B. S. (1998). Reciprocal flexural behaviour and contrasting stratigraphies: a new basin development model for the Karoo retroarc foreland system, South Africa. Basin Research, 10,417-439. R -1 Chelin, M. J. (2000). Water in the coal mining industry - An assessment of water management issues facing the coal mining industry of the Witbank and Middelburg Dam catchments. M.Sc thesis (unpubl.), University of Pretoria, South Africa, 138 pp. Cravotta, C. A., Brady, K. B., Smith, M. W. and Beam, R L. (1990). Effectiveness of Alkaline Addition at Surface Mines in Preventing or Abating Acid Mine Drainage: Part 1, Geochemical Considerations. In: Proceedings of the 1990 Mining and Reclamation Conference and Exhibition, West Virginia University, 1, 221-226. Cruywagen, L. (2000). Static geochemical methods in determining acid mine drainage. M.Sc thesis (unpubl.), University of the Free State, South Africa, 93 pp. Ebbing, D. D. (1993). General Chemistry, 4th Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, p. 664-665. Falcon, R M. S. (1986). A brief review of the origin, formation, and distribution of coal in southern Africa, 1879-1898. In: Anhaeusser, C. R, and Maske, S. (Eds.), Mineral Deposits of Southern Africa, I. Geol. Soc. S. Afr., 1020 pp. Fourie, J. (2003). Analyses of the lithofacies, mineralogy and geochemistry, and the prediction of the mine drainage quality of a future opencast mine in the northeastern Witbank Coalfield. Honours project (unpubl.), University of the Free State, South Africa, 86 pp. Franson, M. A. H., Greenberg, A. E., Trussell, R Rand Clesceri, L. S. (Eds.) (1985). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 16th Edition. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Pollution Control Federation, 1268pp. Gaigher, J. L. (1980). The mineral matter in some South African coals. M.Sc thesis (unpubl.), University of Pretoria, South Africa, 60 pp. R -2 Gluskoter, H. J. (1965). Electronic low-temperature ashing of bituminous coal. Fuel, 44,285-291. Grobbelaar, R. (2001). The long-term impact of intermine flow from collieries in the Mpumalanga Coalfields. M.Sc thesis (unpubl.), University of the Free State, South Africa, 136 pp. Haefner, R. J. (2002). Water quality and geochemical modelling of water at an abandoned coal mine reclaimed with coal combustion by-products. United States Geological Survey, Water-Resources Investigations Report 02-4216,33 pp. Hodgson, F. D. I and Krantz, R. M. (1998). Groundwater quality deterioration in the Olifants River Catchments above the Loskop Dam with specialised investigations in the Witbank Dam Sub-Catchment. Report to the Water Research Commission by the Institute for Groundwater Studies, University of the Orange Free State, WRC Report No. 291/1/98, 272pp. JCPDS International Centre for Diffraction Data. (1980a). Mineral Powder Diffraction File Data Book. JCPDS International Centre for Diffraction Data, U.S.A, 1168pp. JCPDS International Centre for Diffraction Data. (1980b). Mineral Powder Diffraction File Search Manual. JCPDS International Centre for Diffraction Data, U.S.A, 484pp. Jordaan, J. (1986). Highveld Coalfield, 1985-1994. In: Anhaeusser, C. R., and Maske, S. (Eds), Mineral Deposits of Southern Africa, I. Geol. Soc. S. Afr., 1020 pp. Khan, M. A., Ahmad, I., Jan, M. T. and Karim, I. (2002). Mineral matter identification in some Pakistani coals. F.uel Processing Technology, 75, 1-8. Kruger, S. J. (1981). 'n Mineralogiese ondersoek van die asfraksie van steenkool van die Springbokvlakte-Steenkoolveld. M.Sc thesis (unpubl.), Rand Afrikaans University, South Africa, 172 pp. R-3 Kunze, G. W. and Dixon, J. B. (1986). Pre-treatment for Mineralogical Analysis. In: Klute, A. (Ed), Methods of Soil Analysis Part 1: Physical and Mineralogical Methods ~d edition, Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Wisconsin, U. S. A. 91-100. Mackowsky, M.-Th. (1968). Mineral matter in coal. In: Murchison, D. G., and Westoll, T. S. (Eds), Coal and Coal-bearing Strata, Robert Cunningham and Sons Ltd., 309- 321. Martin, J. D., Duwelius, R. F. and Crawford, C. G. (1990). Effects of surface coal mining and reclamation on the geohydrology of six small watersheds in west-central Indiana. United States Geological Survey, Water-Supply Paper 2368, 71pp. McCarthy, M. D. B., Newton, R. J. and Bottrell, S. H. (1998). Oxygen isotopic compositions of sulphate from coals: Implications for primary sulphate sources and secondary weathering processes. Fuel, 77, 677-682. Nicholls, G. D. (1968). The Geochemistry of Coal-bearing Strata In: Murchison, D. G., and Westoll, T. S. (Eds), Coal and Coal-bearing Strata, Robert Cunningham and Sons Ltd., 269-307. Norrish, K. and Hutton, J. T. (1969). An accurate X-ray spectrographic method for the analysis of a wide range of geological samples. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 33, 431-453. Nriagu, J. O. and Moore, P. B. (Eds.) (1984). Phosphate minerals. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 442pp. O'Shay, T., Hossner, L. R. and Dixon, J. B. (1990). A modified hydrogen peroxide method for determination of potential acidity in pyritic overburden. Journal of Environmental Quality, 19,778-782. R -4 Rao, P. D. and Walsh, D. E. (1999). Influence of coal deposition on phosphorous accumulation in a high latitude, northern Alaska coal seam. International Journal of Coal Geology, 38, 261-284. Reeder, R. J. (Ed.) (1983). Carbonates: Mineralogy and Chemistry In: Reviews in Mineralogy, 11. Miner. Soc. Amer., 394pp. Ribbe, P. H. (Ed.) (1974). Sulphide mineralogy In: Reviews in Mineralogy, 1. Miner. Soc. Amer., 284pp. Rietveld, H. M. (1969). A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures. Journal of Applied Crystallography, 2, 65-71. Sams, J. I. and Beer, K. M. (2000). Effects of coal mine drainage on stream water quality in the Allegheny and Monongahela River Basins - Sulphate transport and trends. United States Geological Survey, Water-Resources Investigations Report 99- 4208,23 pp. Snyman, C. P. (1998). Coal. In: The Mineral Resources of South Africa (M. G. C. Wilson and C. R. Anhaeusser, eds.): Handbook, Council for Geoscience, 16, 136- 205. Smith, D. A. M. and Whittaker, R. R. L. G. (1986a). The coalfields of southern Africa: An introduction, 1875-1878. In: Anhaeusser, C. R., and Maske, S. (Eds), Mineral Deposits of Southern Africa, I. Geol. Soc. S. Afr., 1020 pp. Smith, D. A. M. and Whittaker, R. R. L. G. (1986b). The Springs-Witbank coalfield, 1969-1984. In: Anhaeusser, C. R., and Maske, S. (Eds), Mineral Deposits of Southern Africa, I. Geol. Soc. S. Afr., 1020 pp. Smith, R. M. H., Eriksson, P. G. and Botha, W. J. (1993). A review of the stratigraphy and sedimentary environments of the Karoo-aged basins of Southern Africa. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 16. No. 1/2, 143-169. R -5 Spiker, E. C., Pierce, B. S., Bates, A. L. and Stanton, R. W. (1994). Isotopic evidence for the source of sulphur in the Upper Freeport coal bed (west-central Pennsylvania, U.S.A.). Chemical Geology, 114, 115-130. Strahler, A. N. and Strahler, A. H. (1973). Environmental Geoscience: Interaction between natural systems and man. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 511pp. Stratten, T. (1986). Environmental and stratigraphic setting of the Karoo Basin and its mineral deposits, 1863-1873. In: Anhaeusser, C. R., and Maske, S. (Eds), Mineral Deposits of Southern Africa, I. Geol. Soc. S. Afr., 1020 pp. Styan, W. B and Bustin, R. M. (1984). Sedimentology of the Fraser River delta peat deposits: a modern range analogue for some deltaic coals. In: Rahmani, R. A., and Flores, R. M. (Eds), Sedimentology of Coal and Coal-bearing Sequences, Spec. Pubis int. Ass. Sediment., 7, 241-271. Thomas, R. J., von Veh, M. W. and McCourt, S. (1993). The tectonic evolution of southern Africa: an overview. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 16. No. 1/2, 5-24. Usher, B. H., Cruywagen, L. de Necker, E. and Hodgson, F. D. I (2001). On-site and laboratory investigations spoil in opencast collieries and the development of acid- base accounting procedures. Report to the Water Research Commission by the Institute for Groundwater Studies, University of the Orange Free State, WRC Report, 262pp. Van der Spuy, D. and Willis, J. P. (1991). The occurrence of aragonite in carbonate lenses in coals from the Witbank area. South African Journal of Geology, 94(2/3), 178-180. Van Vuuren, C. J. and Cole, D. I. (1979). The stratigraphy and depositional environments of the Ecca Group in the northern part of the Karoo Basin. In: A. M. Anderson and W. J. van Biljon (Editors.), Some sedimentary basins and associated ore deposits of South Africa. Geol. Soc. S. Afr. Spec. Publ. 6, 103-111. R-6 Vassilev, S. V. and Vassileva, C. G. (1996). Occurrence, abundance and origin of minerals in coal and coal ashes. Fuel Processing Technology, 48, 85-106. Vaughan, D. J. and Craig, J. R (1978). Mineral chemistry of metal sulphides. Cambridge University Press, London, 493pp. Wainerdi, R E. and Uken, E. A. (eds.) (1971). Modern methods of geochemical analysis. Plenum Press, New York, 397pp. Ward, C. R (1974). Isolation of mineral matter from Australian bituminous coals using hydrogen peroxide. Fuel, 53, 220-221. (Letters to the Editor). Ward, C. R (Ed.) (1984). Coal geology and coal technology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Australia, 345 pp. Ward, C. R (1986). Review of mineral matter in coal. Australian Coal Geology, 6, 87-110. Ward, C. Rand Gurba, L. W. (1998). Occurrence and distribution of organic sulphur in macerals of Australian coals using electron microprobe. Organic Geochemistry, 28,635-647. Ward, C. R (1999). Mineral characterisation for combustion - The contribution from the geological sciences. In: Gupta, R, Wall, T. F. and Baxter, L. A. (Eds.), The Impact of Mineral Impurities in Solid Fuel Combustion, Kluwer Academici Plenum Publishers, New York, 23-32. Ward, C. R, Taylor, J. C. and Cohen, D. R (1999). Quantitative mineralogy of sandstones by X-ray diffractometry and normative analysis. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 69 (5), 1050-1062. R -7 Ward, C. R, Spears, D. A., Booth, C. A., Staton, I. And Gurba, L. W. (1999). Mineral matter and trace elements in coals of the Gunnedah Basin, New South Wales. Australia, International Journal of Coal Geology, 40, 281-308. Ward, C. R, Taylor, J. C., Matulis, C. E. and Dale, L. S. (2001a). Quantification of mineral matter in the Argonne Premium Coals using interactive Rietveld-based X-ray diffraction. International Journal of Coal Geology, 46, 67-82. Ward, C. R, Backing, M. and Ruan, C. (2001 b). Mineralogical analysis of coals as an aid to seam correlation in the Gloucester Basin, New South Wales, Australia. International Journal of Coal Geology, 47, 31-49. Ward, C. R (2002). Analysis and significance of mineral matter in coal seams. International Journal of Coal Geology, 50, 135-168. Williamson, I. A. (1967). Coal mining geology. Oxford University Press, London, 266pp. R -8 APPENDIX 1 ANALYTICAL METHODS USED FOR ROCK AND COAL SAMPLES A1.1 X-ray fluorescence Spectrometry (XRF) A1.1.1 Sample preparation Underground channel samples and sections from borehole core were cleaned and crushed to approximately 10mm chip size using a jaw crusher, after which 200g of the fraction was milled in a Siebtechnik carbon-steel swing mill to produce powdered rock samples of approximately 50IJm particle size. For the preparation of fusion disks for major element analyses 2g of each powdered rock sample was oven-dried at 11DoC for 24 hours. After being left to cool in a dessicator the sample was weighed to determine the water content. The crucibles were then placed in a furnace at g800e for 4 hours, and then left to cool before measuring the mass loss in order to determine the loss on ignition (LOl) of each sample. Powder briquettes of rock samples were prepared for trace element analyses. Approximately 1Dg of the powdered material was mixed with six drops of Moviol which serves as a binding agent. Boric acid was used to form a protective casing, and samples were pressed at 15 tons pressure on a steel dye to form 32mm diameter briquettes. Powder briquettes of the pulverised coal samples were prepared by combining 32g of the powder with 8g of Hoechst Wax e and mixed in a Turbula mixer for 30 minutes. The mixture was then pressed at 15 tons pressure into 40mm diameter cylindrical briquettes which were used for both major and trace element analysis of coal samples. A1-1 A1.1.2 Technique X-ray fluorescence uses the characterisation of X-ray spectral information to determine the elemental composition of solid samples. Primary excitation of X-rays takes place in the X-ray tube. The bombardment of atoms by primary X-rays leads to the ejection of an electron in the inner shell of the atom. The removal of this electron results in the excitation of secondary X-rays and these are detected and analysed. Atoms of an element produce a characteristic set of X-ray spectral lines for the elements in the portion of the sample undergoing excitation due to the unique electron configuration of each element. Each spectral line of an element has a unique wavelength. Wavelength dispersive XRF uses the rotation through a measured angle (28) of a crystal of a known interplanar spacing (d) to separate the X-ray energy of different wavelengths (A) from the sample, in accordance to Bragg equation: nA = 2d Sin e where n is an integer denoting the spectral order. As the analysing crystal is rotated a detector measures the intensity of the radiation at each wavelength. The intensity is plotted against the wavelength to produce a spectrum of peaks from which the elements in the sample are determined (Azzie, 2002). A1.1.2.1 Coal analysis a. Calibration standards Three South African Reference materials were used for calibration purposes to ensure the accuracy of the analyses. The major element and trace element concentrations are given in the tables below as weight % oxide and ppm respectively. A1-2 Table A1-1: Major and trace element concentrations of reference materials used for coal analyses Element SARM18 SARM19 SARM20 Si02 6.200 15.00 17.66 Ti02 0.114 0.341 0.630 Ab03 2.570 8.010 11.27 Fe203 0.290 1.750 1.170 MgO 0.110 0.200 0.430 CaO 0.180 1.390 1.870 Na20 0.013 0.290 0.270 K20 0.145 0.240 0.140 P20s 0.003 0.013 0.140 S 0.560 1.490 0.510 Nb 6 10 16 Zr 67 351 180 Y 12 20 29 Sr 44 126 330 Rb 8.1 9 10 Zn 5.5 12 17 Cu 5.9 13 18 Ni 10.8 16 25 Mn 22 157 80 Cr 16 50 67 V 23 35 47 Ba 78 304 372 Sc 4.3 7.6 10 A1-3 b. Major elements The major element concentrations determined for coal samples which included Si, Ti, AI, Fe, S, Mg, Ca, Na, K and P, were determined using the coal powder briquettes. Analyses were carried out on a Philips PW 1404 wavelength dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometer with a Rh X-ray tube at 50kV and 50mA. Table A1-2: Analytical conditions for determining major element concentrations for coal analyses Counting Element/Line Collimator Crystal Detector LWL UPL time (s) SiKa C PET FL 26 80 100 TiKa F LlF(220) FL 32 68 100 AlKo C PET FL 26 80 100 FeKa F LlF(220) FL 16 68 100 SKa C GE FL 32 74 100 MgKa F PX-1 FL 36 68 100 CaK F LlF(220) FL 30 76 50 NaKa F PX-1 FL 30 78 100 KKa F LlF(200) FL 32 74 100 PKa C GE FL 34 74 100 Intensities were collected using the Philips X40 software and corrections were made for background, spectral overlap and matrix corrections. A1-4 c. Trace elements Trace element concentrations were determined using the 40mm diameter powder briquettes and analytical conditions are provided in the table A1-3. Intensities for some elements were corrected for mass absorption effects using the RhKa Compton peak. All analyses were conducted under vacuum using a Rh X-ray tube. Table A1-3: Analytical conditions for determining trace element concentrations for coal analyses Element! Counting Background Coil. Crystal Detector LWL UPL kV mA Line time(s) postion(s) RhKa F LlF(220) SC 34 75 200 80 35 NbKa F LlF(200) SC 30 74 200 80 35 ZrKa F LlF(200) SC 30 74 200 80 35 YKa F LlF(200) SC 30 74 200 -0.86; +0.74 80 35 SrKa F LlF(200) SC 30 74 200 +0.78 80 35 RbKa F LlF(200) SC 30 74 200 +0.60 80 35 ZnKa F LlF(220) FS 20 80 200 -1.08; +4.24 60 45 CuKa F LlF(220) FS 20 80 200 +4.44 60 45 NiKa F LlF(220) FS 20 80 200 +2.52 60 45 MnK F LlF(220) FL 15 75 200 +1.00 50 55 CrKa F LlF(220) FL 15 75 200 -4.10; +2.90 50 55 VKa F LlF(200) FL 13 67 200 +3.40 50 55 BaLa F LlF(200) FL 25 75 200 -5.20 50 55 ScKa F LlF(200) FL 25 75 200 -2.78 50 55 A1-5 A1.1.2.2 Rock analysis a. Calibration standards Various certified international rock standards (USGS, CCRMP, CRPG, ANRT, GIT- IWG, GSJ and MINTEK) were used for calibration purposes to ensure accurate analyses. b. Major elements Major element concentrations for rock samples were determined for Si, Ti, AI, Fe, S, Mn, Mg, Ca, Na, K and P using the fusion disks prepared according to the Norrish and Hutton (1969) technique on a Philips PW 1404 wavelength dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometer with a Rh X-ray tube at 50kV and 50mA for all elements, except at 40kV and 75mA for Na. Table A1-4: Analytical conditions for determining major element concentrations for rock analyses Counting Element/Line Collimator Crystal Detector LWL UPL time (s) SiKa F PET FL 35 75 60 TiKa F LlF(200) FL 35 68 10 AIKa C PET FL 30 70 60 FeKa F LlF(220) FS 30 70 30 SKa C GE FL 32 74 100 MnKa F LlF(220) FS 35 70 80 MgKa C PX-1 FL 30 75 100 CaK F LlF(200) FL 35 70 10 NaKa C PX-1 FL 30 78 140 KKa F LlF(200) FL 35 70 20 PKa C GE FL 30 72 60 Intensities were collected using Philips X40 software and corrections were made for background, spectral overlap as well as matrix corrections. A1-6 c. Trace elements Trace element concentrations for rock samples were determined using 32mm diameter powder briquettes. Intensities for some elements were corrected for mass absorption effects using the RhKa Compton peak. All analyses were conducted under vacuum using a Rh X-ray tube. Analytical conditions are provided in table A1- 5. Table A1-5: Analytical conditions for determining trace element concentrations for rock analyses IementIl Coun-ting Background Coil. Crystal Detector lWl UPl kV mA ine time(s) postion(s) RhKa F LlF(200) FS 30 75 30 50 55 NbKa F LlF(200) SC 25 75 80 60 40 ZrKa F LlF(200) SC 30 75 80 60 40 YKa F LlF(200) SC 30 75 80 60 40 SrKa F lIF(200) SC 30 70 80 60 40 RbKa F lIF(200) SC 30 75 80 -0.02 60 40 ZnKa F LlF(200) FS 35 65 80 +1.00 60 40 CuKa F LlF(200) FS 25 70 80 +1.50 60 40 NiKa F LlF(200) FS 35 65 80 -0.70; +1.00 60 40 CoKa F LlF(220) FS 15 80 80 60 40 CrKa F LlF(220) FS 15 70 80 -4.10; +2.90 60 40 VKa F LlF(220) FS 15 70 80 -2.70 60 40 Bala F LlF(200) Fl 25 75 80 -5.10 50 55 ScKa F LlF(200) FS 25 75 80 -2.72 60 40 A1-7 A1.2 X-ray Diffraction analysis (XRD) A1.2.1 Sample preparation The crushed material for each rock and coal sample obtained from the Siebtechnik carbon-steel swing mill was used for X-ray diffraction analysis. Approximately 3g was placed in a flat square holder with a cylindrical mould and pressed lightly with a clean glass slide to produce a flat analytical surface. The sample holder was then slipped into the instrument holder. All analyses where carried out with a Siemens 05000 Diffraktometer with a CuKa radiation at 30kV and 40mA. Diffraction scans of the X- ray intensity pattern against 28 angle were viewed and interpreted l:Ising DIFFRAC- AT V.3.0 software together with the JCPDS Mineral Powder Diffraction File Data Book (1980a) and JCPDS Mineral Powder Diffraction File Search Manual (1980b). A1.2.2 Technique X-ray diffraction from crystalline solids occurs as a result of the interaction of X-rays with the electron charge distribution in the crystal lattice. The ordered nature of the electron charge distribution, whereby most of the electrons are distributed around atomic nuclei which are regularly arranged, means that superposition of the scattered X-ray amplitudes will give rise to regions of constructive and destructive interference. Since the A is known, the crystal plane spacing (d) can be calculated for those angles (8) where the reflection intensity maxima are encountered. A goniometer is used to rotate the sample through a measured angle (28) in the path of the incident X-ray beam and the reflected X-ray beam intensity for each angle is measured by a proportional counter. Using a powdered sample, a great number of particles are arranged in random orientation, ensuring that each crystallographic plane would lie parallel to the surface in a fair number of grains. The diffraction peaks are individually considered to be the result of diffraction of the incident X-ray beam of wavelength A from crystal lattice planes, having Miller indices hkl and spacing dhkl. Plotting the measured intensity against the 28 angle (or corresponding crystal d-spacing) produces a diffractogram from which the minerals in the sample can be characterised. (Wainerdi et a/., 1971). A1-8 APPENDIX 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS The following tables contains all analytical data concerning sample localities, XRF results, XRD interpretation and some plotted scans, as well as normative calculation results. Mn is analysed as a trace element for all coal samples. Table A2-1: Coordinates for samples collected at Arnot Colliery SiteName Ycoord Xcoord Zcoord Seam Rock Type No. ARA1 -2864883.98 77952.94 1622.86 BASE Basement ARA2 -2864883.98 77952.94 1626.53 SLT Siltstone ARA3 -2864883.98 77952.94 1628.51 1F Sandstone ARA4 -2864883.98 77952.94 1629.20 11F Siltstone ARA5 -2864883.98 77952.94 1629.50 1 Coal ARA6 -2864883.98 77952.94 1630.15 1R Sandstone ARA7 -2864883.98 77952.94 1630.28 GRIT Sandstone ARA8 -2864883.98 77952.94 1630.62 2F Siltstone ARA9 -2864883.98 77952.94 1632.42 2 Coal ARA10 -2864883.98 77952.94 1633.92 2 Coal ARA11 -2864883.98 77952.94 1635.76 2R Sandstone ARA12 -2864883.98 77952.94 1662.64 4F Siltstone ARA13 -2864883.98 77952.94 1663.05 4L Coal ARA14 -2864883.98 77952.94 1663.24 4PT Sandstone ARA15 -2864883.98 77952.94 1663.26 4U Coal ARA16 -2864883.98 77952.94 1663.87 4R Sandstone ARB1 -2864947.98 77967.96 1630.91 1F Siltstone ARB2 -2864947.98 77967.96 1631.44 1 Coal ARB3 -2864947.98 77967.96 1631.85 1R Siltstone ARB4 -2864947.98 77967.96 1632.45 2F Siltstone ARB5 -2864947.98 77967.96 1633.07 2L Coal ARB6 -2864947.98 77967.96 1634.54 2PT Sandstone ARB7 -2864947.98 77967.96 1637.13 2U Coal ARB8 -2864947.98 77967.96 1637.29 2R Sandstone ARB9 -2864947.98 77967.96 1662.61 4F Siltstone ARB10 -2864947.98 77967.96 1663.18 4L Coal ARB11 -2864947.98 77967.96 1663.35 4PT Sandstone ARB13 -2864947.98 77967.96 1664.04 4R Sandstone ARC1 -2866327.09 77573.22 1624.48 1F Carb-shale ARC2 -2866327.09 77573.22 1624.59 1 Coal ARC3 -2866327.09 77573.22 1625.37 1R Sandstone ARC4 -2866327.09 77573.22 1626.88 2F Siltstone ARC5 -2866327.09 77573.22 1627.21 2 Coal ARC6 -2866327.09 77573.22 1628.04 2 Coal ARC7 -2866327.09 77573.22 1630.20 2R Sandstone ARD1 -2866352.86 77469.63 1624.08 1F Siltstone A2-1 ARD2 -2866352.86 77469.63 1624.39 1 Coal AR03 -2866352.86 77469.63 1624.82 1R Sandstone AR04 -2866352.86 77469.63 1625.74 2F Siltstone ARD5 -2866352.86 77469.63 1626.15 2 Coal ARD6 -2866352.86 77469.63 1628.46 2 Coal AR07 -2866352.86 77469.63 1629.31 2R Sandstone Table A2-2: Coordinates for samples collected at Arnot-North Colliery SiteName Ycoord Xcoord Zcoord Seam Rock Type No. 3936 -2857270.17 73329.04 1644.50 Clay Clay 3937 -2857270.17 73329.04 1641.50 2LR Shale 3938 -2857270.17 73329.04 1638.50 2L Coal 3939 -2857270.17 73329.04 1629.50 2LF Carb-shale 3940 -2857270.17 73329.04 1627.50 SST Sandstone 3941 -2857270.17 73329.04 1621.50 SST Sandstone 3942 -2856746.44 72331.99 1646.00 SH Shale 3943 -2856746.44 72331.99 1640.00 SH Carb-shale 3944 -2856746.44 72331.99 1637.00 2R Carb-siltstone 3945 -2856746.44 72331.99 1631.00 2L Coal 3946 -2856746.44 72331.99 1628.00 2F Carb-siltstone 3947 -2856746.44 72331.99 1625.00 SST Sandstone 3948 -2855373.57 72709.39 1648.50 SH Shale 3949 -2855373.57 72709.39 1646.50 SH Shale 3950 -2855373.57 72709.39 1645.50 2R Carb-shale 3951 -2855373.57 72709.39 1643.50 2L Coal 3952 -2855373.57 72709.39 1638.50 2F Sandstone 3953 -2855373.57 72709.39 1627.50 SST Sandstone 3954 -2854105.73 74421.50 1653.50 2R Carb-shale 3955 -2854105.73 74421.50 1651.50 2L Coal 3956 -2854105.73 74421.50 1649.50 2F Sandstone 3957 -2854105.73 74421.50 1647.50 1U Coal 3958 -2854105.73 74421.50 1645.50 1F Sandstone 3959 -2854105.73 74421.50 1644.50 SLT Carb-siltstone Table A2-3: Coordinates for samples collected at Bank Colliery SiteName Ycoord Xcoord Zcoord Seam Rock Type No. BAN1 -2878644.35 45214.91 1522.84 2L Coal BAN2 -2878644.35 45214.91 1523.84 2M Coal BAN3 -2878644.35 45214.91 1524.84 2U Coal BAN4 -2879297.47 45462.95 1537.45 2L Coal BAN5 -2879297.47 45462.95 1538.45 2M Coal BAN6 -2879297.47 45462.95 1539.45 2U Coal BAN7 -2879454.29 46319.89 1552.53 2L Coal BAN8 -2879454.29 46319.89 1553.53 2M Coal BAN9 -2879454.29 46319.89 1554.53 2U Coal BAN10 -2879454.29 46319.89 1555.03 2R Shale BAN11 -2878162.08 50813.27 1607.58 5F Siltstone BAN12 -2878162.08 50813.27 1608.02 5L Coal BAN13 -2878162.08 50813.27 1608.58 5U Coal A2-2 BAN14 -2878162.08 50813.27 1609.05 5R Shale BAN15 -2879073.68 49481.60 1603.03 5F Siltstone BAN16 -2879073.68 49481.60 1603.58 5L Coal BAN17 -2879073.68 49481.60 1604.02 5U Coal BAN18 -2879073.68 49481.60 1604.58 5R Shale BAN19 -2872869.08 50547.11 1562.23 2L Coal BAN20 -2872869.08 50547.11 1563.23 2M Coal BAN21 -2872869.08 50547.11 1564.23 2U Coal Table A2-4' Coordinates for samples collected at Bankfontein Colliery Site Name Ycoord Xcoord Zcoord Seam Rock Type No. BK1 -2880508.00 920.00 1536.00 2 Coal BK2 -2880555.00 913.00 1535.57 2 Coal BK3 -2880551.00 877.00 1536.25 2 Coal Table A2-5: Coordinates for samples collected from Borehole 1 SiteName Ycoord Xcoord Zcoord Seam Rock Type No. BH1-1 -2947146.93 15989.31 1525.88 5H Coal BH1-2 -2947146.93 15989.31 1525.66 5M Coal BH1-3 -2947146.93 15989.31 1481.96 GRT Sandstone BH1-4 -2947146.93 15989.31 1480.09 4L Coal BH1-5 -2947146.93 15989.31 1479.09 4L Coal BH1-6 -2947146.93 15989.31 1478.55 4L Coal BH1-7 -2947146.93 15989.31 1478.01 SST Siltstone Table A2-6: Coordinates for samples collected from Borehole wedge 1 SiteName Ycoord Xcoord Zcoord Seam Rock Type No. BHW1-1 -2950042.50 23166.14 1468.31 SST Sandstone BHW1-2 -2950042.50 23166.14 1465.22 SST Sandstone BHW1-3 -2950042.50 23166.14 1464.83 SST Sandstone BHW1-4 -2950042.50 23166.14 1463.99 SST Siltstone BHW1-5 -2950042.50 23166.14 1463.63 4R Siltstone BHW1-6 -2950042.50 23166.14 1463.52 4 Coal BHW1-7 -2950042.50 23166.14 1462.63 4 Coal BHW1-8 -2950042.50 23166.14 1461.96 4 Coal BHW1-9 -2950042.50 23166.14 1460.39 4 Coal BHW1-10 -2950042.50 23166.14 1459.93 4F Siltstone BHW1-11 -2950042.50 23166.14 1458.44 SST Sandstone BHW1-12 -2950042.50 23166.14 1457.25 SST Sandstone Table A2-7: Coordinates for samples collected from Borehole wedge 2 SiteName Ycoord Xcoord Zcoord Seam Rock Type No. BHW2-1 -2954192.99 17751.51 1458.76 4HR Sandstone BHW2-2 -2954192.99 17751.51 1458.44 4H Coal BHW2-3 -2954192.99 17751.51 1458.25 4H Coal BHW2-4 -2954192.99 17751.51 1457.82 4HF Siltstone BHW2-5 -2954192.99 17751.51 1447.27 4LR Sandstone BHW2-6 -2954192.99 17751.51 1446.26 4L Coal A2-3 BHW2-7 -2954192.99 17751.51 1444.55 4L Coal BHW2-8 -2954192.99 17751.51 1444.31 4L Coal BHW2·9 -2954192.99 17751.51 1444.14 4LF Siltstone Table A2-8· Coordinates for samples collected from Borehole wedge 3 SiteName Ycoord Xcoord Zcoord Seam Rock Type No. BHW3·1 -2933495.01 27629.99 1551.37 5R Sandstone BHW3-2 -2933495.01 27629.99 1551.30 5 Coal BHW3·3 -2933495.01 27629.99 1550.52 5PT Sandstone BHW3-4 -2933495.01 27629.99 1550.45 5 Coal BHW3·5 -2933495.01 27629.99 1550.18 5CSH Carb-shale BHW3·6 -2933495.01 27629.99 1549.52 5F Sandstone BHW3·7 -2933495.01 27629.99 1512.66 4HR Sandstone BHW3-8 -2933495.01 27629.99 1518.55 4H Coal BHW3·9 -2933495.01 27629.99 1512.25 4HF Siltstone BHW3·10 -2933495.01 27629.99 1507.88 4LR Sandstone BHW3-11 -2933495.01 27629.99 1507.07 4L Coal BHW3-12 -2933495.01 27629.99 1505.69 4L Coal BHW3-13 -2933495.01 27629.99 1504.71 4L Coal BHW3·14 -2933495.01 27629.99 1501.91 4LF Siltstone Table A2-9: Coordinates for samples collected from Borehole wedge 4 SiteName Ycoord Xcoord Zcoord Seam Rock Type No. BHW4-1 -2936351.00 1032.19 1515.53 5 Coal BHW4·2 -2936351.00 1032.19 1485.84 4HR Sandstone BHW4-3 -2936351.00 1032.19 1485.01 4H Coal BHW4·4 -2936351.00 1032.19 1484.81 4HF Sandstone BHW4·5 -2936351.00 1032.19 1483.93 4LR Sandstone BHW4-6 -2936351.00 1032.19 1483.07 4L Coal BHW4-7 -2936351.00 1032.19 1482.69 4L Coal BHW4-8 -2936351.00 1032.19 1481.65 4L Coal BHW4-9 -2936351.00 1032.19 1480.71 4L Coal BHW4-10 -2936351.00 1032.19 1480.16 4L Coal BHW4·11 -2936351.00 1032.19 1479.80 4LF Sandstone Table A2-10: Coordinates for samples collected from Borehole wedge 5 SiteName Ycoord Xcoord Zcoord Seam Rock Type No. BHW5·1 -2935040.00 25124.98 1560.05 5R Sandstone BHW5-2 -2935040.00 25124.98 1558.99 5 Coal BHW5·3 -2935040.00 25124.98 1555.65 5F Sandstone BHW5·4 -2935040.00 25124.98 1517.12 SST Sandstone BHW5·5 -2935040.00 25124.98 1514.91 SST Sandstone BHW5·6 -2935040.00 25124.98 1513.93 SST Sandstone BHW5·7 -2935040.00 25124.98 1512.78 SST Sandstone BHW5·8 -2935040.00 25124.98 1511.99 SST Siltstone BHW5·9 -2935040.00 25124.98 1511.91 4R Sandstone BHW5-10 -2935040.00 25124.98 1511.61 4 Coal BHW5-11 -2935040.00 25124.98 1510.10 4 Coal A2-4 BHW5-12 -2935040.00 25124.98 1509.89 4 Coal BHW5-13 -2935040.00 25124.98 1508.81 4 Coal BHW5-14 -2935040.00 25124.98 1508.73 4F Siltstone BHW5-15 -2935040.00 25124.98 1508.03 SST Siltstone Table A2-11: Coordinates for samples collected at Delmas Colliery SiteName Ycoord Xcoord Zcoord Seam Rock Type No. DEL1 -2908320.00 -17200.00 1510.00 4R Carb-shale DEL2 -2908325.00 -17200.00 1510.00 4 Coal DEL4 -2907780.00 -17700.00 1510.00 4 Coal DEL5 -2907720.00 -17710.00 1510.00 4 Coal DEL6 -2907760.00 -17580.00 1510.00 4F Sandstone DEL7 -2907340.00 -17540.00 1510.00 4 Coal DEL8 -2907359.00 -17545.00 1510.00 4 Coal DEL9 -2907347.00 -17540.00 1510.00 4 Coal DEL10 -2906470.00 -16956.00 1510.00 4 Coal DEL11 -2906464.00 -16950.00 1510.00 4 Coal DEL12 -2906470.00 -16942.00 1510.00 4 Coal DEL13 -2906473.00 -16950.00 1510.00 4 Coal DEL14 -2906520.00 -16054.00 1510.00 4 Coal DEL15 -2906527.00 -16050.00 1510.00 4 Coal DEL16 -2905938.00 -16000.00 1510.00 4 Coal DEL17 -2905940.00 -16007.00 1510.00 4 Coal Table A2-12: Coordinates for samples collected at Douglas Colliery Site Name Ycoord Xcoord Zcoord Seam Rock Type No. DOU1 -2881667.00 30130.00 1495.65 1F Siltstone DOU2 -2881667.00 30130.00 1496.70 1 Coal DOU3 -2881667.00 30130.00 1497.20 1 Coal DOU4 -2881667.00 30130.00 1497.60 1R Sandstone DOU5 -2881667.00 30130.00 1499.70 2AF Siltstone DOU6 -2881667.00 30130.00 1500.20 2A Coal DOU7 -2881667.00 30130.00 1500.52 2AR Siltstone DOU8 -2881667.00 30130.00 1500.70 2L Coal DOU9 -2881667.00 30130.00 1502.70 2M Coal DOU1O -2881667.00 30130.00 1505.80 2U Coal DOU11 -2881667.00 30130.00 1506.60 2R Siltstone DOU12 -2881667.00 30130.00 1523.70 4LF Siltstone DOU13 -2881667.00 30130.00 1524.70 4LL Coal DOU14 -2881667.00 30130.00 1525.70 4LM Coal DOU15 -2881667.00 30130.00 1526.20 4L Coal DOU16 -2881667.00 30130.00 1526.70 4LR Siltstone DOU17 -2881667.00 30130.00 1555.70 5F Sandstone DOU18 -2881667.00 30130.00 1557.70 5 Coal DOU19 -2881667.00 30130.00 1558.00 5R Sandstone DOU20 -2879326.00 28806.00 1540.60 4R Siltstone DOU21 -2879326.00 28806.00 1540.30 4R Siltstone DOU22 -2879326.00 28806.00 1539.30 4L Coal DOU23 -2879326.00 28806.00 1539.00 4LF Carb-shale A2-5 DOU24 -2879326.00 28806.00 1522.97 2R Siltstone DOU25 -2879326.00 28806.00 1522.30 2U Coal DOU26 -2879326.00 28806.00 1521.30 2M Coal DOU27 -2879326.00 28806.00 1520.30 2M Coal DOU28 -2879326.00 28806.00 1519.30 2L Coal DOU29 -2879326.00 28806.00 1517.80 2F Sandstone DOU30 -2879542.98 39860.97 1548.93 4LR Siltstone DOU31 -2879542.98 39860.97 1548.53 4LU Coal DOU32 -2879542.98 39860.97 1547.53 4LM Coal DOU33 -2879542.98 39860.97 1546.33 4LL Coal DOU34 -2879542.98 39860.97 1546.03 4LF Sandstone DOU3S -2879542.98 39860.97 1528.63 2R Siltstone DOU36 -2879542.98 39860.97 1528.03 2LU Coal DOU37 -2879542.98 39860.97 1527.03 2LM Coal DOU38 -2879542.98 39860.97 1523.83 2LL Coal DOU39 -2879542.98 39860.97 1522.03 2:1PT Sandstone DOU40 -2879542.98 39860.97 1521.03 1M Coal DOU41 -2879542.98 39860.97 1548.73 4LPT Sandstone Table A2-13: Coordinates for samples collected at Forzando Colliery SiteName Ycoord Xcoord Zcoord Seam Rock Type No. FOR1 -2905525.00 54580.00 1542.00 4U Coal FOR2 -2905549.00 54588.00 1541.00 4L Coal FOR3 -2905546.00 54579.00 1540.00 4F Shale FOR4 -2905001.00 57200.00 1562.00 4R Siltstone FOR5 -2905000.00 57201.00 1560.00 4U Coal FOR6 -2905002.00 57200.00 1559.00 4L Coal FOR7 -2905000.00 57199.00 1562.00 4R Sandstone FORS -2904999.00 57200.00 1559.20 4UPT Sandstone FOR9 -2905000.00 57203.00 1558.00 4F Sandstone FOR10 -2904499.00 55500.00 1548.00 4F Sandstone FOR11 -2904500.00 55503.00 1550.00 4U Coal FOR12 -2904505.00 55501.00 1549.00 4L Coal FOR13 -2904502.00 55504.00 1551.00 4R Sandstone Table A2-14· Coordinates for samples collected at Greenside Colliery SiteName Ycoord Xcoord Zcoord Seam Rock Type No. GRE1 -2872150.00 17400.00 1505.93 4R Carb-shale GRE2 -2872150.00 17400.00 1504.93 4U Coal GRE3 -2872150.00 17400.00 1503.93 4M Coal GRE4 -2872150.00 17400.00 1502.93 4L Coal GRES -2872150.00 17400.00 1501.93 4F Sandstone GREG -2871780.00 15840.00 1495.61 4R Carb-shale GRE7 -2871780.00 15840.00 1494.61 4U Coal GRE8 -2871780.00 15840.00 1493.61 4M Coal GRE9 -2871780.00 15840.00 1492.61 4L Coal GRE10 -2871780.00 15840.00 1491.61 4F Sandstone GRE11 -2873200.00 15680.00 1486.71 4R Carb-shale GRE12 -2873200.00 15680.00 1485.71 4U Coal A2-6 GRE13 -2873200.00 15680.00 1484.71 4M Coal GRE14 -2873200.00 15680.00 1483.71 4L Coal GRE15 -2873200.00 15680.00 1482.71 4F Sandstone NGT1 -2895180.00 9510.00 1566.68 5R Siltstone NGT2 -2895180.00 9510.00 1565.68 5U Coal NGT3 -2895180.00 9510.00 1564.68 5M Coal NGT4 -2895180.00 9510.00 1563.68 5L Coal NGT5 -2895180.00 9510.00 1562.68 5F Siltstone NGT6 -2895774.00 9800.00 1562.23 5R Siltstone NGT7 -2895774.00 9800.00 1561.23 5U Coal NGT8 -2895774.00 9800.00 1560.23 5M Coal NGT9 -2895774.00 9800.00 1559.23 5L Coal NGT10 -2895774.00 9800.00 1558.23 5F Siltstone NGT11 -2895125.00 10375.00 1562.05 5R Shale NGT12 -2895125.00 10375.00 1561.05 5U Coal NGT13 -28~5125.00 10375.00 1560.05 5M Coal NGT14 -2895125.00 10375.00 1559.05 5L Coal NGT15 -2895125.00 10375.00 1558.05 5F Shale Table A2-15: Coordinates for samples collected at Kleinkopje Colliery SiteName Ycoord Xcoord Zcoord Seam Rock Type No. KK1 -2880961.00 25713.00 1507.00 2RCSH Carb-shale KK2 -2880961.00 25713.00 1506.00 2RC Coal KK3 -2880961.00 25713.00 1505.00 2TC Coal KK4 -2880961.00 25713.00 1504.00 2SC Coal KK5 -2880961.00 25713.00 1503.00 2FCSH Carb-shale KK6 -2880871.00 25072.00 1500.00 1PTSST Sandstone KK7 -2880871.00 25072.00 1499.00 1 Coal KK8 -2876175.00 25041.00 1505.00 4RSH Shale KK9 -2876175.00 25041.00 1503.00 4 Coal KK10 -2876175.00 25041.00 1502.00 4FSST Sandstone KK11 -2873617.00 24993.00 1529.00 2RSH Shale KK12 -2873617.00 24993.00 1528.00 2TC Coal KK13 -2873617.00 24993.00 1526.00 2SC Coal KK14 -2873617.00 24993.00 1525.00 2FSST Sandstone KK15 -2876641.00 23340.00 1489.00 1PTSST Sandstone KK16 -2876641.00 23340.00 1488.00 1 Coal Table A2-16' Coordinates for samples collected at Khutala Colliery SiteName Ycoord Xcoord Zcoord Seam Rock Type No. KHU1 -2894484.00 4560.00 1505.44 2 Coal KHU2 -2894477.00 4559.00 1505.44 2 Coal KHU3 -2894479.00 4555.00 1505.44 2 Coal KHU4 -2894472.00 4557.00 1505.44 2 Coal KHU5 -2894479.00 4562.00 1505.44 2 Coal KHU6 -2894482.00 4560.00 1505.44 2 Coal KHU7 -2894479.00 4565.00 1505.44 2F Sandstone KHU8 -2894016.00 4345.00 1505.44 2 Coal KHU9 -2894019.00 4347.00 1498.99 2 Coal A2-7 KHU10 -2894019.00 4345.00 1498.99 2 Coal KHU11 -2888192.54 2600.21 1538.59 4 Coal KHU12 -2888189.54 2607.21 1538.59 4 Coal KHU13 -2888184.54 2600.21 1538.59 4 Coal KHU14 -2887115.83 1330.43 1538.59 4 Coal KHU15 -2887121.83 1326.43 1538.59 4 Coal KHU16 -2887115.83 1326.43 1538.59 4 Coal Table A2-17: Coordinates for samples collected at Koornfontein Colliery SiteName Ycoord Xcoord Zcoord Seam Rock Type No. KOR1 -2895816.18 54045.17 1560.43 2 Coal KOR2 -2895806.18 54045.17 1560.43 2 Coal KOR3 -2895806.18 54039.17 1560.43 2 Coal KOR4 -2895727.39 53997.06 1560.07 2 Coal KOR5 -2895733.39 53994.06 1560.07 2 Coal KOR6 -2895733.39 53991.06 1560.07 2 Coal KOR7 -2895463.33 53900.93 1547.47 2 Coal KOR8 -2895458.33 53900.93 1547.47 2 Coal KOR9 -2895458.33 53915.93 1547.47 2 Coal KOR10 -2895469.47 53967.79 1543.44 2 Coal KORSST -2895466.47 53967.79 1539.20 2F Sandstone KOR11 -2895466.47 53973.79 1543.44 2 Coal KOR12 -2895456.47 53967.79 1543.44 2 Coal KOR13 -2895384.33 53847.18 1543.24 2 Coal KOR14 -2895388.33 53852.18 1543.24 2 Coal KOR15 -2895383.33 53860.18 1543.24 2 Coal KOR16 -2888574.87 54187.52 1539.20 2 Coal KOR17 -2888569.87 54187.52 1539.20 2 Coal KOR18 -2888571.87 54191.52 1539.20 2 Coal Table A2-18: Coordinates for samples collected at Kromdraai Colliery SiteName Ycoord Xcoord Zcoord Seam Rock Type No. KRD1 -2850785.00 9675.00 1478.80 2:1C Coal KRD2 -2850785.00 9671.00 1478.80 2:1C Coal KRD3 -2850785.00 9673.00 1478.80 2:1C Coal KR04 -2851395.00 9535.00 1479.92 2:1PT Sandstone KROS -2851395.00 9535.00 1480.52 2:1PT Sandstone KRD6 -2851395.00 9535.00 1478.80 1 Coal KRD7 -2851395.00 9535.00 1479.28 1 Coal KRD8 -2851395.00 9535.00 1479.80 1 Coal KRD9 -2851395.00 9535.00 1480.98 2 Coal KRD10 -2851395.00 9535.00 1481.43 2 Coal KRD11 -2851395.00 9535.00 1481:88 2 Coal Table A2-19: Coordinates for samples collected at Lakeside Colliery SiteName Ycoord Xcoord Zcoord Seam Rock Type No. LK1 -2889631.00 8756 1516.30 2 Coal LK2 -2890049.00 9049 1517.08 2 Coal A2-8 LK3 -2889362.00 8903 1517.43 2 Coal LK4 -2889810.00 8977 1516.40 2 Coal LK5 -2889089.00 9561 1512.60 2 Coal LK6 -2889181.00 8970 1516.58 2 Coal LK7 -2889141.00 9174 1513.91 2 Coal Table A2-20: Coordinates for samples collected at Leeufontein Colliery SiteName Ycoord Xcoord Zcoord Seam Rock Type No. LU1 -2889778.00 6627 1536.25 2 Coal LU2 -2889763.00 6417 1508.60 2 Coal LU3 -2889835.00 6390 1508.61 2 Coal LU4 -2890835.00 6339 1508.54 2 Coal LU5 -2891835.00 6249 1508.10 2F Sandstone LU6 -2889735.00 6252 1508.25 2 Coal LU7 -2889835.00 6141 1508.63 2 Coal LU8 -2889935.00 6096 1508.92 2 Coal LU9 -2890165.00 6567 1503.65 2 Coal LU10 -2889979.00 6423 1500.20 2 Coal LU11 -2890072.00 6390 1501.26 2 Coal LU13 -2890141.00 6279 1501.41 2 Coal LU14 -2890192.00 6135 1500.47 2 Coal LU15 -2890465.00 6273 1500.47 2 Coal LU16 -2890789.00 6426 1500.13 2 Coal LU17 -2890912.00 6192 1501.65 2 Coal LU18 -2890915.00 6339 1502.36 2 Coal LU19 -2890855.00 6420 1501.85 2 Coal LU20 -2890921.00 6534 1500.47 2 Coal LU21 -2891044.00 6303 1501.85 2 Coal LU22 -2891029.00 6-327 1502.36 2 Coal LU23 -2890792.00 6621 1500.20 2 Coal LU24 -2890639.00 5076 1506.46 2 Coal LU25 -2890792.00 4776 1508.05 2 Coal LU26 -2890912.00 4809 1504.27 2 Coal LU27 -2890963.00 4881 1500.54 2 Coal LU28 -2890867.00 4743 1508.24 2 Coal LU29 -2891005.00 4551 1506.53 2 Coal LU30 -2890732.00 4710 1508.99 2 Coal LUP1 -2888898.00 6497 1514.80 2 Coal LUP2 -2888941.00 6507 1514.60 2 Coal LUP3 -2888950.00 6459 1515.69 2 Coal LUP4 -2888908.00 6707 1510.28 2 Coal Table A2-21: Coordinates for samples collected at Middelburg Colliery SiteName Ycoord Xcoord Zcoord Seam Rock Type No. M1 -2865344.78 47482.93 1550.90 1 Coal M2 -2865344.78 47482.93 1552.33 1 Coal M3 -2865344.78 47482.93 1553.19 1SST Sandstone M4 -2865344.78 47482.93 1553.82 2ASST Sandstone M5 -2865344.78 47482.93 1554.40 2A Coal A2-9 M6 -2865344.78 47482.93 1555.54 2A Coal M7 -2865344.78 47482.93 1556.11 2A Coal M8 -2865344.78 47482.93 1556.57 2A Coal M9 -2865344.78 47482.93 1560.79 2 Coal M10 -2865344.78 47482.93 1561.91 2RSH Carb-shale M11 -2877251.58 40629.11 1524.44 1 Coal M12 -2877251.58 40629.11 1525.65 1 Coal M13 -2877251.58 40629.11 1527.21 2F Sandstone M14 -2877251.58 40629.11 1527.23 2 Coal M15 -2877251.58 40629.11 1529.31 2 Coal M16 -2877251.58 40629.11 1531.75 2 Coal M17 -2877251.58 40629.11 1533.40 2 Coal M18 -2877251.58 40629.11 1554.74 4A Coal M19 -2877251.58 40629.11 1556.26 4A Coal M20 -2877251.58 40629.11 1557.20 4 Coal M21 -2877251.58 40629.11 1557.40 4F Siltstone M22 -2877251.58 40629.11 1558.34 4F Sandstone Table A2-22' Coordinates for samples collected at Optimum Colliery SiteName Ycoord Xcoord Zcoord Seam Rock Type No. OPT1 -2877246.00 59362.00 - 4L Coal OPT2 -2877235.00 59369.00 - 4L Coal OPT3 -2877240.00 59354.00 - 4PT Sandstone OPT4 -2876863.00 59200.00 - 2 Coal OPT5 -2876857.00 59212.00 - 2 Coal OPT6 -2875120.00 64245.00 - 2U Coal OPT7 -2875126.00 64240.00 - 2U Coal OPT8 -2875120.00 64237.00 - 2R Sandstone OPT9 -2876474.00 73360.00 - 2U Coal OPT10 -2876481.00 73352.00 - 2U Coal OPT11 -2876485.00 73361.00 - 2PT Sandstone OPT12 -2876480.00 73369.00 - 2L Coal OPT13 -2876477.00 73356.00 - 2L Coal Table A2-23: Coordinates for samples collected at Rietspruit Colliery SiteName Ycoord Xcoord Zcoord Seam Rock Type No. R2RO -2890602.00 20301.00 1515.00 2 Siltstone R2M -2890613.00 20307.00 1513.00 2 Coal R2M2 -2890616.00 20315.00 1511.00 2 Coal R2LW -2890620.00 20308.00 1505.00 2 Coal R4UROOF -2891141.00 21320.00 1547.00 4 Siltstone R4U -2891144.00 21325.00 1545.00 4 Coal R4PT -2891147.00 21318.00 1543.50 4 Siltstone R4L -2891150.00 21315.00 1542.00 4 Coal R4FUG -2889456.00 20000.00 1541.00 4 Sandstone R4FLG -2889452.00 20010.00 1540.00 4 Sandstone R4F1 -2889457.00 20004.00 1539.00 4 Sandstone R4F2 -2889449.00 20001.00 1538.50 4 Sandstone R4F3 -2889453.00 20007.00 1538.00 4 Sandstone A2-10 Table A2-24: Coordinates for samples collected at South Witbank Colliery SiteName Ycoord Xcoord Zcoord Seam Rock Type No. SW1 -2893355.00 12037.00 1531.40 4 Coal SW2 -2893357.00 12039.00 1531.40 4 Coal SW3 -2893355.00 12029.00 1531.40 4 Coal SW4 -2893194.00 12809.00 1533.20 4 Coal SW5 -2893190.00 12803.00 1533.20 4 Coal SW6 -2893188.00 12794.00 1533.20 4 Coal SW7 -2893068.00 12920.00 1532.20 4 Coal SW8 -2893070.00 12925.00 1532.20 4 Coal SW9 -2893074.00 12920.00 1532.20 4 Coal SW10 -2893078.00 12916.00 1532.20 4 Coal Table A2-25: Coordinates for samples collected at Tavistock Colliery SiteName Ycoord Xcoord Zcoord Seam Rock Type No. TAV1A -2891594.45 17389.50 1537.40 4U Coal TAV1B -2891593.45 17389.50 1537.40 4U Coal TAV1C -2891595.45 17389.50 1537.40 4U Coal TAV2A -2891593.45 17387.50 1535.80 4M Coal TAV2B -2891593.45 17389.50 1535.80 4M Coal TAV2C -2891593.45 17391.50 1535.80 4M Coal TAV3A -2891590.45 17389.50 1534.10 4L Coal TAV3B -2891588.45 17389.50 1534.10 4L Coal TAV3C -2891596.45 17389.50 1534.10 4L Coal TAV4A -2891593.45 17394.50 1534.40 4PT Carb-shale TAV4B -2891593.45 17393.50 1534.40 4PT Carb-shale TAV4C -2891593.45 17388.50 1534.40 4PT Carb-shale TAV5A -2890966.90 16215.47 1537.90 4U Coal TAV5B -2890966.90 16217.47 1537.90 4U Coal TAV5C -2890966.90 16219.47 1537.90 4U Coal TAV6A -2890963.90 16217.47 1536.80 4M Coal TAV6B -2890967.90 16217.47 1536.80 4M Coal TAV6C -2890970.90 16217.47 1536.80 4M Coal TAV7A -2890969.90 16217.47 1534.40 4L Coal TAV7C -2890966.90 16220.47 1534.40 4L Coal Table A2-26' Coordinates for samples collected at Union Colliery SiteName Ycoord Xcoord Zcoord Seam Rock Type No. UN1 -2903670.25 100603.23 1682.00 DUMP2 Coal UN2 -2903667.25 100604.23 1682.00 DUMP2 Coal UN3 -2903526.26 101073.20 1670.00 DUMP3 Coal UN4 -2903528.26 101076.20 1670.00 DUMP3 Coal UN5B -2906494.87 100345.40 1682.00 DUMPBD Coal UN6B -2906490.87 100341.40 1682.00 DUMPBD Coal A2-11 Table A2-27: Major element oxide concentrations for Arnot Colliery (values presented as wt%) SiteName Si02 Ti02 AI203 Fe203 S MnO MgO CaO Na20 K20 P205 H2O' LOl Total ARA1 52.46 2.61 21.07 8.64 0.02 0.05 3.74 0.50 0.00 1.63 0.34 0.68 7.79 99.53 ARA2 47.76 2.20 19.98 1.41 0.22 0.01 0.06 0.09 0.04 1.44 0.03 1.12 24.82 99.18 ARA3 78.92 3.30 7.71 2.42 0.03 0.04 0.19 0.10 0.04 1.14 0.02 0.25 6.45 100.61 ARA4 37.49 0.83 22.32 0.78 0.19 0.01 0.15 0.09 0.03 0.70 0.04 1.73 35.02 99.38 ARA5 8.56 0.24 4.56 1.11 0.83 0.00 0.23 0.63 0.00 0.02 0.02 3.13 79.32 98.65 ARA6 58.28 1.92 31.81 1.05 0.04 0.01 0.09 0.11 0.05 0.72 0.04 0.25 4.92 99.29 ARA7 53.46 1.13 22.56 0.77 0.07 0.01 0.15 0.06 0.06 1.50 0.05 1.22 18.34 99.38 ARAS 50.32 1.08 23.98 0.76 0.07 0.01 0.10 0.06 0.05 1.18 0.05 1.28 20.42 99.36 ARA9 9.53 0.32 4.21 0.21 0.33 0.00 0.45 2.12 0.00 0.06 0.03 5.11 76.49 98.86 ARA10 8.69 0.28 5.34 0.07 0.24 0.00 0.41 1.47 0.01 0.06 0.15 3.83 76.17 96.72 ARA11 82.30 1.29 7.56 0.97 1.29 0.02 0.16 0.22 0.10 1.78 0.03 0.17 4.94 100.83 ARA12 67.72 1.50 5.11 3.94 0.09 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.60 0.03 1.54 19.55 100.12 ARA13 11.13 0.28 8.29 2.25 1.77 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.05 3.02 73.15 100.11 ARA14 41.85 0.97 20.23 0.60 0.22 0.01 0.14 0.07 0.01 0.71 0.05 1.61 33.12 99.59 ARA15 19.56 0.53 8.90 0.42 0.40 0.00 0.14 0.19 0.00 0.32 0.02 3.73 64.33 98.54 ARA16 75.14 0.70 13.19 2.30 0.21 0.03 0.36 0.17 0.17 4.19 0.06 0.21 4.21 100.94 ARB1 61.87 2.14 7.33 4.15 0.99 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.09 1.10 0.02 0.31 20.96 98.99 ARB2 16.79 0.91 8.41 0.27 0.45 0.00 0.09 0.16 0.00 0.18 0.01 3.74 67.33 98.34 ARB3 77.87 1.26 6.09 1.30 0.05 0.05 1.58 3.19 0.04 1.59 0.02 0.20 7.20 100.44 ARB4 71.16 0.89 14.43 0.79 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.24 0.05 1.18 0.04 0.55 10.98 100.40 ARB5 10.35 0.44 6.33 0.36 0.74 0.00 0.18 0.37 0.01 0.42 0.03 2.48 78.13 99.84 ARB6 71.77 0.64 7.90 2.62 0.45 0.05 1.36 3.74 0.04 1.12 0.03 0.30 9.57 99.59 ARB7 6.93 0.13 5.22 0.06 0.43 0.00 0.14 0.81 0.00 0.02 0.04 3.46 81.12 98.36 ARBS 89.66 0.81 4.50 1.42 0.37 0.01 0.00 0.07 0.08 0.55 0.08 0.23 . 2.92 100.70 ARB9 46.10 1.13 21.95 0.66 0.15 0.00 0.15 0.08 0.03 0.75 0.06 1.73 26.22 99.01 ARB10 17.88 0.25 12.21 0.78 0.76 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.03 5.23 62.36 99.65 ARB11 47.38 1.02 25.40 1.27 0.10 0.02 0.32 0.17 0.02 0.92 0.05 1.79 21.31 99.77 ARB13 60.63 0.96 15.21 4.91 0.08 0.13 1.65 2.51 0.07 3.89 0.08 0.55 8.77 99.44 ARC1 39.89 1.69 16.97 1.05 0.18 0.01 0.10 0.08 0.02 0.75 0.03 2.06 36.22 99.05 A2-12 ARC2 6.31 0.33 4.11 1.89 1.17 0.00 0.25 0.97 0.00 0.11 0.01 8.44 76.27 99.86 ARC3 81.07 1.28 7.45 1.25 0.03 0.04 0.17 0.55 0.04 1.42 0.03 0.28 6.06 99.67 ARC4 52.88 1.04 19.91 0.90 0.10 0.01 0.12 0.06 0.06 1.45 0.04 1.26 21.85 99.68 ARC5 3.09 0.21 2.46 2.87 1.90 0.00 0.23 1.02 0.00 0.10 0.00 9.93 78.93 100.74 ARC6 10.72 0.43 5.57 0.21 0.27 0.00 0.08 0.84 0.00 0.03 0.00 7.72 74.15 100.02 ARC7 84.99 2.18 5.65 2.96 0.53 0.02 0.00 0.04 0.03 0.37 0.03 0.23 3.57 100.60 AR01 34.53 1.39 14.04 0.82 0.25 0.01 0.05 0.12 0.02 0.71 0.03 2.23 44.97 99.17 ARD2 9.84 0.51 6.08 1.64 0.94 0.00 0.18 0.65 0.00 0.16 0.04 5.64 74.22 99.90 AR03 76.66 0.71 4.42 2.62 0.14 0.07 1.63 4.71 0.02 1.29 0.02 0.26 7.84 100.39 AR04 54.67 0.97 19.85 0.81 0.08 0.01 0.05 0.05 0.05 1.48 0.06 1.38 20.13 99.59 ARD5 14.37 0.50 5.44 0.09 0.18 0.00 0.07 0.38 0.00 0.03 0.00 10.71 66.59 98.36 ARD6 8.59 0.38 6.44 3.22 0.67 0.00 0.29 1.47 0.00 0.10 0.02 3.46 75.44 100.08 AR07 84.76 3.44 6.14 1.85 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.17 0.01 0.21 0.12 0.29 3.15 100.19 Table A2-28: Major element oxide concentrations for Arnot-North Colliery (values presented as wt%) Site Name sio, Ti02 AI203 Fe203 5 MnO MgO CaO Na20 K20 P20S H2O' LOl Total 3936 57.33 1.10 22.10 7.11 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.04 0.18 1.47 0.21 0.87 8.62 99.28 3937 57.70 1.15 21.64 5.50 0.04 0.03 0.17 0.11 0.17 1.86 0.14 1.05 9.76 99.32 3938 13.98 0.55 8.74 1.28 0.37 0.00 0.09 0.40 0.14 0.18 0.07 4.52 69.38 99.70 3939 47.62 1.24 14.47 3.55 0.32 0.03 0.08 0.45 0.21 0.72 0.17 2.95 28.31 100.12 3940 69.89 1.21 15.32 2.57 0.86 0.03 0.29 0.18 0.26 2.32 0.07 0.73 7.05 100.78 3941 54.54 1.38 11.39 14.34 0.14 0.22 1.25 2.68 1.57 2.83 0.51 0.35 9.20 100.40 3942 57.40 1.04 19.65 8.55 0.05 0.18 0.41 0.09 0.20 2.54 0.11 1.76 7.60 99.58 3943 42.42 0.93 20.19 10.86 0.43 0.21 0.43 0.38 0.19 1.26 0.38 1.26 20.74 99.68 3944 43.51 0.89 16.15 16.35 0.58 0.23 0.75 0.40 0.20 2.02 0.17 0.62 18.40 100.27 3945 16.57 0.40 6.84 1.65 0.65 0.00 0.03 0.10 0.14 0.19 0.07 2.44 70.48 99.56 3946 59.80 3.80 10.96 3.84 0.51 0.05 0.00 0.11 0.19 1.32 0.05 0.69 17.64 98.96 3947 74.53 2.06 10.43 2.33 0.15 0.04 0.01 0.33 0.17 2.71 0.05 0.28 5.85 98.94 3948 50.86 1.18 20.19 14.00 0.05 0.21 0.36 0.04 0.18 2.24 0.18 1.12 8.47 99.08 I 3949 58.48 1.52 20.28 5.18 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.28 0.15 0.90 0.20 1.19 10.58 98.92 3950 52.72 2.17 14.55 5.04 0.09 0.04 0.04 0.60 0.15 0.71 0.11 2.61 20.38 99.21 3951 21.93 0.61 6.86 2.47 0.67 0.00 0.02 0.26 0.14 0.23 0.04 3.09 63.04 99.36 · A2-13 3952 67.55 4.25 10.97 3.47 0.16 0.04 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.96 0.04 0.56 10.67 98.97 3953 61.04 0.85 10.08 11.05 0.43 0.25 0.98 2.52 0.53 2.30 0.15 0.43 9.89 100.50 3954 57.23 1.20 20.56 3.96 0.04 0.04 0.21 0.51 0.21 1.22 0.18 1.76 12.29 99.41 3955 24.49 0.52 8.97 1.79 0.53 0.00 0.07 0.35 0.15 0.32 0.06 3.72 59.05 100.02 3956 84.73 2.25 5.17 0.86 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.20 0.86 0.03 0.34 5.10 99.90 3957 55.72 2.31 12.99 2.04 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.17 1.28 0.06 1.18 23.09 99.67 3958 72.97 4.09 8.49 4.11 0.42 0.07 0.00 0.19 0.19 1.74 0.03 0.44 6.87 99.61 3959 55.59 2.15 11.48 2.16 0.22 0.04 0.02 0.18 0.15 0.76 0.03 0.94 25.70 99.42 --- Table A2-29: Major element oxide concentrations for Bank Colliery (values presented as wt%) SiteName Si02 Ti02 Ah03 Fe203 5 MnO MgO CaO Na20 K20 P20S H2O LOl Total BAN1 3.27 0.15 3.77 0.61 0.77 0.00 0.30 2.77 0.00 0.11 0.54 1.13 85.53 98.95 BAN2 5.87 0.20 5.46 0.45 0.62 0.00 0.25 1.69 0.00 0.15 0.39 1.71 81.41 98.20 BAN3 6.25 0.36 5.77 0.47 0.61 0.00 0.13 1.30 0.00 0.39 0.66 1.86 81.15 98.95 BAN4 0.95 0.18 3.03 0.58 0.77 0.00 0.56 3.22 0.00 0.03 0.55 1.24 89.05 100.16 BAN5 6.48 0.49 6.26 0.04 0.33 0.00 0.18 0.61 0.02 0.12 0.01 1.30 82.98 98.81 BAN6 5.53 0.21 3.91 0.24 0.49 0.00 0.15 0.98 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.62 85.73 98.00 BAN7 12.14 0.99 8.34 0.09 0.32 0.00 0.31 0.97 0.02 0.11 0.01 2.23 73.01 98.54 BAN8 3.99 0.18 3.84 0.62 0.68 0.00 0.36 1.44 0.00 0.20 0.01 2.14 85.48 98.94 BAN9 0.57 0.16 2.94 0.96 0.76 0.00 0.24 1.23 0.00 0.13 0.26 2.09 89.48 98.82 BAN10 49.79 1.07 24.34 1.71 0.07 0.01 0.45 0.31 0.06 1.22 0.34 1.20 18.68 99.25 BAN11 54.37 0.90 23.21 1.36 0.08 0.00 0.53 0.21 0.02 2.40 0.03 2.34 13.73 99.18 BAN12 8.54 0.15 2.84 0.78 0.81 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 6.64 80.54 100.66 BAN13 5.79 0.12 2.17 1.70 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 16.64 72.36 99.98 BAN14 26.48 0.28 10.49 20.03 0.93 0.44 1.70 3.24 0.00 2.07 1.76 2.30 29.42 99.14 BAN15 55.18 0.94 22.37 1.50 0.08 0.01 0.63 0.21 0.02 2.42 0.03 2.53 13.89 99.81 BAN16 8.17 0.10 2.65 3.15 1.82 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 2.87 81.03 100.00 BAN17 13.35 0.21 4.52 1.97 1.12 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00 2.64 75.63 99.91 BAN18 56.34 0.72 14.48 7.41 0.75 0.02 1.85 0.35 0.18 4.66 0.08 3.79 9.37 100.00 BAN19 7.56 0.55 6.24 0.32 0.33 0.00 0.08 0.85 0.00 0.05 0.07 2.35 80.25 98.65 BAN20 5.67 0.66 6.03 0.06 0.23 0.00 0.12 1.50 0.00 0.07 0.10 1.69 83.38 99.51 - ----~- A2-14 I BAN21 5.64 0.44 6.17 0.77 0.52 0.00 0.15 -_n1~j8-o.00 0.08 0.21 1.74 82.13 99.63 I Table A2-30: Major element oxide concentrations for Bankfontein Colliery (values presented as wt%) SiteName Si02 Ti02 AI203 Fe203 S MnO MgO CaO Na20 K20 P20S H2O. LOl Total BK1 3.45 0.24 3.76 0.10 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.23 5.94 85.37 99.55 BK2 0.94 0.01 2.24 2.31 2.06 0.00 0.14 6.31 0.00 0.00 3.48 5.54 76.73 99.76 BK3 10.15 0.29 7.72 0.15 0.38 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 2.50 78.32 99.71 Table A2-31: Major element oxide concentrations for Borehole 1 (values presented as wt%) SiteName Si02 Ti02 AI203 Fe203 S MnO MgO CaO Na20 K20 P20S H2O. LOl Total BH1-1 27.24 0.50 13.11 3.10 0.51 0.00 0.98 0.17 0.51 1.40 0.00 9.53 42.87 99.93 BH1-2 26.11 0.34 10.98 0.76 0.65 0.00 0.34 0.17 0.36 0.68 0.00 14.15 45.74 100.28 BH1-3 83.89 0.15 3.13 5.47 1.57 0.02 0.00 1.40 0.12 1.06 0.01 0.25 3.10 100.17 BH1-4 5.08 0.12 6.08 0.60 1.46 0.00 0.48 2.81 0.22 0.82 2.05 13.90 67.11 100.73 BH1-5 6.30 0.31 4.78 0.25 0.80 0.00 0.39 2.34 0.25 0.35 0.31 3.06 82.66 101.80 BH1-6 6.47 0.31 5.42 0.25 0.92 0.00 0.59 2.78 0.50 0.41 0.07 11.61 70.23 99.56 BH1-7 63.91 1.15 19.84 0.96 0.07 0.02 0.06 0.06 0.67 2.12 0.05 1.32 9.46 99.69 Table A2-32: Major element oxide concentrations for Borehole wedge 1 (values presented as wt%) SiteName Si02 Ti02 AI203 Fe203 S MnO MgO CaO Na20 K20 P20S H2O. LOl Total BHW1-1 84.30 0.31 7.46 1.31 0.26 0.02 0.00 0.43 0.96 3.24 0.03 0.08 1.65 100.05 BHW1-2 81.35 0.44 8.90 2.01 0.73 0.02 0.08 0.19 0.95 3.28 0.04 0.19 2.44 100.62 BHW1-3 81.00 0.38 6.08 1.53 0.44 0.02 0.00 3.10 0.74 2.77 0.03 0.15 3.74 99.98 BHW1-4 45.77 0.53 10.44 17.38 1.79 0.15 1.82 3.12 0.28 2.50 0.10 0.63 17.17 101.68 BHW1-5 69.21 0.60 6.39 6.25 2.00 0.05 0.18 2.80 0.31 1.82 0.02 0.54 11.87 102.04 BHW1-6 13.09 0.57 5.53 0.96 0.68 0.00 0.15 0.70 0.11 0.08 0.01 5.88 72.06 99.82 BHW1-7 13.64 0.44 5.68 1.36 0.85 0.00 0.42 2.15 0.11 0.07 0.00 6.26 69.57 100.55 BHW1-8 8.08 0.34 3.53 1.10 0.92 0.00 0.49 2.75 0.08 0.04 0.00 9.76 73.03 100.12 BHW1-9 6.70 0.21 3.94 0.80 0.71 0.00 0.23 1.44 0.09 0.04 0.02 11.05 75.33 100.56 BHW1-10 66.93 0.68 14.24 2.48 0.44 0.02 0.14 0.35 0.24 0.77 0.04 0.76 13.50 100.59 A2-15 BHW1-11 56.11 0.65 27.34 0.98 0.04 0.00 0.08 0.04 0.28 3.08 0.06 0.73 9.86 99.25 BHW1-12 76.91 0.52 13.71 0.66 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.25 3.04 0.02 0.27 4.24 99.67 Table A2-33: Major element oxide concentrations for Borehole wedge 2 (values presented as wt%) Site Name sro, Ti02 AI203 Fe203 5 MnO MgO CaO Na20 K20 P205 H2O. LOl Total BHW2-1 77.50 0.27 9.45 2.04 0.84 0.01 0.06 0.24 1.77 3.16 0.02 0.37 5.14 100.87 BHW2-2 31.93 0.65 13.72 2.27 0.85 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.35 0.89 0.01 6.99 40.35 98.38 BHW2-3 27.94 0.22 14.91 5.90 2.87 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.71 0.00 3.72 42.46 99.54 BHW2-4 66.85 0.86 15.41 2.86 0.92 0.01 0.23 0.03 0.75 3.49 0.03 0.69 7.64 99.77 BHW2-S 67.73 0.41 7.83 9.22 2.46 0.05 0.36 1.41 0.67 3.03 0.03 0.31 5.76 99.27 BHW2-6 18.04 0.52 6.99 1.18 0.52 0.00 0.11 0.45 0.10 0.10 0.00 5.39 65.84 99.24 BHW2-7 8.20 0.15 4.14 0.69 0.33 0.00 0.50 2.95 0.10 0.08 0.00 8.43 74.64 100.21 BHW2-8 2.13 0.14 2.14 2.77 1.88 0.00 0.57 4.38 0.06 0.04 0.00 13.92 71.53 99.56 BHW2-9 43.67 1.34 26.09 1.37 0.11 0.01 0.23 0.19 0.28 1.16 0.05 1.36 23.51 99.37 Table A2-34: Major element oxide concentrations for Borehole wedge 3 (values presented as wt%) SiteName sio, Ti02 AI203 Fe203 5 MnO MgO CaO Na20 K20 P205 H2O. LOl Total BHW3-1 85.36 0.39 4.98 0.96 0.15 0.02 0.00 0.29 0.38 2.82 0.02 0.22 4.54 100.13 BHW3-2 4.91 0.28 2.85 2.70 2.47 0.00 0.14 0.82 0.04 0.30 0.00 5.64 80.09 100.24 BHW3-3 52.80 0.26 5.80 8.83 1.39 0.01 0.81 0.15 0.29 2.80 0.03 1.61 26.18 100.96 BHW3-4 10.58 0.14 5.40 1.77 1.57 0.00 0.38 0.71 0.18 0.27 0.00 4.15 74.53 99.68 I BHW3-S 38.63 0.66 14.73 4.88 0.39 0.03 1.13 0.28 0.45 2.07 0.03 3.60 32.95 99.83 I BHW3-6 71.67 0.26 8.39 1.95 0.09 0.07 0.12 6.36 1.32 2.52 0.04 0.27 6.62 99.68 BHW3-7 53.98 0.19 5.77 9.33 1.31 0.11 3.57 3.49 0.24 2.61 0.09 0.81 18.81 100.31 BHW3-8 5.72 0.28 3.16 2.78 2.61 0.00 0.08 0.63 0.05 0.33 0.01 2.78 81.37 99.80 BHW3-9 66.65 0.75 17.27 1.41 0.16 0.01 0.17 0.00 0.24 3.37 0.03 0.56 9.28 99.90 BHW3-10 77.49 0.90 9.69 2.60 1.04 0.01 0.24 0.00 0.52 1.80 0.04 0.36 5.57 100.26 BHW3-11 9.40 0.40 5.16 0.45 0.58 0.00 0.16 0.67 0.09 0.14 0.17 4.16 79.02 100.40 BHW3-12 6.89 0.26 4.26 1.33 1.04 0.00 0.40 1.92 0.09 0.11 0.21 4.68 77.38 98.57 BHW3-13 7.04 0.29 5.13 0.36 0.77 0.00 0.23 1.52 0.10 0.25 0.34 4.27 77.83 98.13 A2-16 I BHW3-14 65.38 0.51 17.92 1.24 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.24 1.96 0.03 0.63 11.41 99.55 I Table A2-35: Major element oxide concentrations for Borehole wedge 4 (values presented as wt%) Site Name sio, Ti02 AI203 Fe203 5 MnO MgO CaO Na20 K20 P20S H2O' LOl Total BHW4-1 13.63 0.25 6.44 1.62 1.23 0.00 0.30 0.41 0.16 0.41 0.00 3.31 72.51 100.27 BHW4-2 54.31 0.83 13.24 10.09 1.54 0.02 0.75 0.18 0.59 2.40 0.05 0.97 15.86 100.83 BHW4-3 11.91 0.29 5.89 3.98 3.18 0.00 0.16 0.35 0.11 0.54 0.01 2.70 71.01 100.13 BHW4-4 70.36 0.66 13.66 4.46 1.33 0.01 0.03 0.13 0.41 2.05 0.04 0.00 7.63 100.77 BHW4-5 83.80 0.41 4.26 3.09 0.99 0.01 0.00 0.08 0.21 1.24 0.02 0.29 6.20 100.60 BHW4-6 11.43 0.37 6.12 0.50 0.36 0.00 0.32 1.27 0.13 0.18 0.01 4.21 75.11 100.01 I BHW4-7 29.15 0.73 10.67 0.47 0.15 0.00 0.32 0.62 0.19 0.34 0.00 3.18 53.65 99.47 I BHW4-8 19.28 0.40 9.22 0.24 0.19 0.00 0.39 1.52 0.16 0.11 0.00 4.30 63.42 99.24 BHW4-9 9.59 0.39 4.88 0.22 0.39 0.00 0.44 1.99 0.13 0.07 0.00 3.39 78.45 99.94 BHW4-10 2.93 0.17 2.45 3.50 2.29 0.00 0.33 3.20 0.08 0.01 0.04 3.74 81.24 99.97 BHW4-11 74.11 0.60 12.73 0.82 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 3.75 0.02 0.43 6.78 99.65 Table A2-36: Major element oxide concentrations for Borehole wedge 5 (values presented as wt%) SiteName sio, Ti02 AI203 Fe203 5 MnO MgO CaO Na20 K20 P20S H2O' LOl Total BHW5-1 43.56 0.82 17.12 8.05 1.45 0.03 0.87 0.15 0.55 2.29 0.08 1.53 23.19 99.69 BHW5-2 10.64 0.36 6.59 5.99 2.97 0.00 0.11 0.27 0.07 0.40 0.02 2.02 69.03 100.04 BHW5-3 56.15 0.99 21.39 3.21 0.93 0.02 0.52 0.06 0.57 2.47 0.05 0.95 12.77 100.08 BHW5-4 85.19 0.79 7.46 0.93 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.16 2.77 0.02 0.27 2.09 99.72 BHW5-5 82.04 1.04 7.66 2.81 0.09 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.14 2.29 0.03 0.25 3.36 99.77 BHW5-6 90.21 0.31 2.75 3.05 0.07 0.02 0.09 0.03 0.14 0.73 0.02 0.13 2.23 99.78 BHW5-7 89.25 0.40 3.79 2.74 0.09 0.02 0.00 0.07 0.11 1.45 0.07 0.13 2.11 100.23 BHW5-8 58.46 0.87 19.57 5.48 0.83 0.03 0.20 0.05 0.47 1.96 0.04 0.71 11.68 100.35 BHW5-9 69.16 0.72 14.40 4.26 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.46 1.77 0.04 0.46 8.63 99.96 BHW5-10 8.51 0.53 4.88 3.50 2.18 0.00 0.09 0.82 0.07 0.17 0.32 6.50 72.22 99.79 BHW5-11 4.79 0.34 4.97 0.34 0.71 0.00 0.28 1.58 0.10 0.14 0.42 5.97 80.34 99.98 A2-17 BHW5-12 9.51 0.75 4.26 0.46 0.46 0.00 0.63 2.58 0.10 0.15 0.11 8.61 72.13 99.75 BHW5-13 7.36 0.49 4.92 0.26 0.73 0.00 0.28 1.71 0.12 0.25 0.26 4.38 79.09 99.84 BHW5-14 59.33 0.59 22.31 1.18 0.10 0.01 0.13 0.21 0.29 1.80 0.03 0.98 12.22 99.18 BHW5-15 66.24 0.62 19.81 0.75 0.03 0.01 0.04 0.08 0.25 2.14 0.03 0.75 8.58 99.33 Table A2-37: Major element oxide concentrations for Delmas Colliery (values presented as wt%) Site Name Si02 Ti02 AI203 Fe203 S MnO MgO CaO Na20 K20 P20S H2O- LOl Total DEL1 36.32 0.79 17.96 0.51 0.23 0.00 0.38 0.22 0.20 0.53 0.06 2.96 39.13 99.29 DEL2 11.76 0.43 7.46 2.74 1.35 0.00 0.27 2.30 0.15 0.34 0.28 3.08 70.47 100.63 DEL4 1.00 0.17 3.18 11.07 5.49 0.00 0.12 2.71 0.07 0.16 0.44 3.15 71.43 98.99 DEL5 2.84 0.23 2.94 3.04 1.52 0.00 0.17 3.07 0.09 0.22 0.97 5.15 80.36 100.60 DEL6 53.62 1.15 26.00 0.73 1.00 0.00 0.26 0.31 0.22 0.73 0.08 0.33 14.91 99.34 DEL7 4.84 0.41 4.62 0.07 0.83 0.00 0.11 3.69 0.13 0.18 0.46 4.34 80.64 100.32 DEL8 5.31 0.19 4.25 9.22 7.64 0.00 0.50 2.54 0.07 0.11 0.29 3.16 66.92 100.20 DEL9 1.56 0.06 1.95 2.16 1.74 0.00 0.51 6.42 0.11 0.10 1.44 4.97 78.31 99.33 DEL10 6.94 0.44 4.93 0.06 0.70 0.00 0.22 1.98 0.09 0.25 0.24 3.24 79.49 98.58 DEL11 0.08 0.19 2.76 0.09 0.96 0.00 0.30 2.79 0.08 0.20 1.40 6.11 85.30 100.26 DEL12 4.45 0.32 4.04 2.09 2.59 0.00 0.18 4.86 0.07 0.28 0.63 2.64 78.41 100.56 DEL13 6.61 1.62 3.24 0.69 1.37 0.00 0.13 0.61 0.08 0.51 0.01 5.31 79.26 99.44 DEL14 11.78 0.51 8.78 0.64 0.92 0.00 0.56 1.85 0.10 0.49 0.27 3.69 69.24 98.83 DEL15 2.62 0.24 2.73 2.63 3.65 0.00 0.25 2.54 0.07 0.44 0.54 4.06 79.77 99.54 DEL16 8.12 0.78 6.79 0.59 1.15 0.00 0.40 1.87 0.07 0.29 0.09 2.16 77.94 100.25 DEL17 2.79 0.44 3.49 3.31 3.43 0.00 0.24 1.73 0.06 0.23 0.58 5.16 79.12 100.58 A2-18 Table A2-38: Major element oxide concentrations for Douglas Colliery (values presented as wt%) SiteName Si02 Ti02 AI203 Fe203 S MnO MgO CaO Na20 K20 P205 H2O. LOl Total DOU1 41.55 1.06 13.86 0.38 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.38 0.03 0.62 41.24 99.36 DOU2 8.74 0.36 4.68 1.22 0.88 0.00 0.18 1.57 0.00 0.07 0.00 2.76 79.55 100.01 DOU3 10.28 0.46 5.69 0.04 0.37 0.00 0.08 0.33 0.00 0.09 0.00 3.51 79.29 100.14 DOU4 73.91 0.83 4.45 1.07 0.12 0.09 0.90 6.81 0.00 0.41 0.02 0.18 10.72 99.51 DOU5 46.34 0.95 15.26 0.60 0.28 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.05 0.64 0.03 0.63 35.16 100.00 DOU6 5.05 0.19 3.29 0.34 0.80 0.00 0.22 1.48 0.00 0.07 0.00 2.96 84.35 98.74 DOU7 39.41 1.15 22.70 0.44 0.20 0.01 0.14 0.26 0.03 0.34 0.02 0.74 34.10 99.54 DOU8 0.62 0.12 2.18 6.12 3.08 0.00 0.15 1.56 0.00 0.01 0.04 8.20 74.41 99.33 DOU9 3.90 0.13 2.77 1.32 1.05 0.00 0.66 4.16 0.00 0.01 0.75 3.65 80.22 98.62 DOU10 14.14 0.53 9.83 3.79 1.89 0.00 0.49 2.02 0.01 0.22 0.21 1.82 63.13 98.08 DOU11 48.09 1.02 23.96 1.86 0.14 0.01 0.25 0.13 0.05 1.05 0.34 0.80 21.79 99.49 DOU12 48.21 0.97 29.38 1.19 0.06 0.01 0.43 0.39 0.08 2.77 0.04 0.71 15.70 99.94 DOU13 7.14 0.22 3.45 0.75 0.64 0.00 0.60 4.30 0.00 0.05 0.35 1.65 80.21 99.36 DOU14 8.55 0.38 4.44 1.28 0.83 0.00 0.21 1.33 0.00 0.09 0.15 1.67 79.58 98.51 DOU15 25.73 0.60 11.12 1.14 0.80 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.03 0.41 57.88 98.23 DOU16 62.96 1.08 19.95 1.12 0.10 0.01 0.07 0.03 0.04 1.72 0.06 0.55 12.58 100.27 DOU17 56.48 0.94 22.47 2.42 0.23 0.01 0.74 0.26 0.03 2.85 0.04 2.13 11.10 99.70 DOU18 8.89 0.19 3.43 1.31 1.01 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.00 4.62 80.37 100.10 DOU19 74.52 0.53 12.39 1.95 0.63 0.02 0.29 0.09 0.35 2.57 0.05 0.50 6.00 99.89 DOU20 58.36 1.09 21.94 1.38 0.15 0.00 0.02 0.06 0.03 1.41 0.06 0.56 13.63 98.69 DOU21 51.49 0.43 4.25 18.03 5.25 0.01 0.00 0.14 0.08 1.21 0.15 0.16 19.06 100.26 DOU22 0.53 0.22 2.76 6.78 4.66 0.00 0.13 3.38 0.00 0.08 1.59 1.24 78.72 100.09 DOU23 41.13 1.38 28.72 1.31 0.18 0.03 0.56 1.65 0.02 0.45 0.06 0.83 23.49 99.81 DOU24 49.04 1.11 26.51 1.51 0.08 0.01 0.45 0.27 0.03 1.26 0.14 0.83 18.94 100.18 DOU25 21.89 1.02 13.13 0.28 0.27 0.00 0.05 0.21 0.00 0.13 0.04 1.38 59.88 98.28 DOU26 11.48 0.31 9.51 0.56 0.56 0.00 0.12 2.93 0.00 0.25 1.92 1.44 69.45 98.53 DOU27 2.84 0.29 3.42 0.57 0.79 0.00 0.00 1.44 0.00 0.12 0.14 0.60 88.61 98.83 DOU28 0.70 0.41 2.74 0.74 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.00 0.12 0.10 1.66 90.32 98.67 A2-19 DOU29 68.99 1.73 16.85 0.79 0.06 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.69 0.03 0.31 10.58 100.10 DOU30 52.99 1.13 26.04 1.64 0.06 0.02 0.41 0.11 0.04 1.49 0.18 0.77 15.10 99.98 DOU31 6.24 0.29 4.06 1.42 1.40 0.00 0.04 0.77 0.00 0.18 0.39 4.25 81.09 100.13 DOU32 17.81 0.67 6.63 0.16 0.31 0.00 0.04 0.51 0.00 0.06 0.61 14.29 57.96 99.06 DOU33 6.10 0.32 3.23 1.46 1.46 0.00 0.22 0.67 0.00 0.06 0.07 2.49 83.80 99.88 DOU34 55.75 1.17 23.15 2.69 0.26 0.01 0.03 0.07 0.03 1.97 0.04 0.81 13.88 99.86 DOU35 54.20 1.80 15.18 4.59 0.52 0.03 1.43 0.75 0.05 1.29 0.09 0.61 19.26 99.80 DOU36 8.21 0.41 6.48 0.13 0.31 0.00 0.04 0.28 0.00 0.11 0.00 2.91 81.04 99.92 DOU37 7.99 0.27 3.91 0.12 0.63 0.00 0.09 1.25 0.00 0.07 0.00 1.25 84.67 100.25 DOU38 17.61 0.40 7.46 0.10 0.27 0.00 0.17 0.65 0.00 0.13 0.00 1.42 72.00 100.21 DOU39 47.42 1.16 10.19 1.02 0.23 0.03 0.74 2.95 0.01 0.41 0.02 0.67 34.42 99.27 DOU40 12.49 0.27 3.91 3.41 1.67 0.00 0.01 0.20 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.57 77.47 100.01 DOU41 62.38 2.20 9.26 1.64 0.07 0.02 0.27 0.79 0.02 0.16 0.02 0.48 22.41 99.72 Table A2-39: Major element oxide concentrations for Forzando Colliery (values presented as wt%) I Site Name Si02 Ti02 AI203 Fe203 S MnO MgO CaO Na20 K20 P205 H2O- LOl Total FOR1 6.82 0.17 3.03 0.19 0.43 0.00 0.48 2.71 0.05 0.00 0.00 5.41 79.79 99.08 FOR2 5.98 2.19 4.04 1.00 1.11 0.00 0.31 3.15 0.05 0.10 0.70 3.99 75.11 97.72 FOR3 57.90 1.14 20.83 2.32 0.24 0.02 0.19 0.39 0.18 1.14 0.04 0.88 14.71 99.98 FOR4 55.35 1.30 21.83 0.74 0.15 0.02 0.18 0.31 0.17 1.09 0.04 1.25 17.59 100.02 FOR5 9.33 0.23 5.67 1.22 0.94 0.00 0.20 1.24 0.03 0.14 0.01 1.71 78.33 99.05 FOR6 12.89 0.29 5.74 0.61 0.71 0.00 0.30 1.55 0.06 0.16 0.00 1.76 75.50 99.57 FOR7 76.99 0.49 12.59 1.62 0.26 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.53 4.23 0.04 0.25 3.28 100.34 FORS 42.58 0.67 14.02 4.46 0.60 0.01 0.16 0.17 0.08 1.24 0.03 1.33 35.22 100.57 FOR9 38.54 0.99 18.23 10.37 1.73 0.01 0.12 0.17 0.21 0.92 0.07 1.20 27.58 100.14 FOR10 57.18 1.30 18.82 6.87 0.82 0.02 0.13 0.05 0.16 1.04 0.04 0.63 13.56 100.62 FOR11 4.69 0.13 3.50 0.38 0.60 0.00 0.09 0.98 0.01 0.00 0.00 3.18 86.36 99.91 FOR12 9.79 0.24 4.96 0.31 0.72 0.00 0.39 1.82 0.02 0.09 0.00 1.17 80.28 99.79 FOR13 79.08 0.48 10.11 2.65 0.60 0.02 0.00 0.05 0.46 3.67 0.03 0.21 3.22 100.58 ------ A2-20 Table A2-40: Major element oxide concentrations for Greenside Colliery (values presented as wt%) SiteName Si02 Ti02 AI203 Fe203 S MnO MgO CaO Na20 K20 P205 H2O' lOl Total GRE1 24.43 0.49 9.43 5.77 1.70 0.03 1.30 3.84 0.00 0.52 0.02 1.12 51.26 99.91 GRE2 8.29 0.35 6.29 3.33 1.92 0.00 0.25 2.11 0.00 0.10 0.49 1.77 74.95 99.85 GRE3 7.06 0.43 5.61 5.81 3.03 0.00 0.13 1.51 0.00 0.08 0.27 1.59 74.04 99.56 GRE4 9.83 0.37 4.79 1.07 0.78 0.00 0.10 1.63 0.00 0.03 0.00 2.25 78.46 99.31 GRE5 68.06 0.39 6.43 6.84 1.93 0.02 0.47 0.14 0.06 1.66 0.02 0.37 14.56 100.95 GRE6 46.84 1.04 20.39 0.43 0.11 0.00 0.03 0.06 0.06 0.82 0.06 0.74 28.66 99.24 GRE7 3.92 0.23 3.68 0.83 0.84 0.00 0.06 3.34 0.00 0.06 1.33 2.08 83.53 99.90 GRE8 5.78 0.28 4.20 0.47 0.61 0.00 0.08 3.10 0.00 0.08 1.56 2.99 80.92 100.07 GRE9 5.74 0.25 3.04 1.21 0.89 0.00 0.28 2.95 0.00 0.00 0.13 2.02 83.03 99.54 GRE10 69.83 1.76 16.95 0.82 0.07 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.15 0.70 0.03 0.30 8.69 99.34 GRE11 41.37 0.99 21.39 0.48 0.17 0.01 0.24 0.31 0.11 0.69 0.03 1.29 32.83 99.91 GRE12 3.92 0.26 2.86 2.60 1.97 0.00 0.54 3.29 0.00 0.05 0.03 3.04 80.99 99.55 GRE13 10.68 0.39 4.29 0.11 0.36 0.00 0.35 2.59 0.00 0.03 0.00 2.41 78.66 99.87 GRE14 4.61 0.38 2.09 3.08 2.18 0.00 0.74 3.77 0.00 0.00 0.01 2.67 79.45 98.98 GRE15 92.94 0.12 2.76 0.87 0.17 0.02 0.19 0.71 0.09 0.67 0.01 0.21 1.71 100.47 NGT1 52.99 0.92 17.97 4.95 0.56 0.04 1.43 0.40 0.21 3.16 0.09 2.46 14.48 99.66 NGT2 29.27 0.47 11.15 0.58 0.34 0.00 0.28 0.08 0.00 0.62 0.00 2.98 54.79 100.56 NGT3 6.90 0.08 3.10 0.23 0.48 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 3.19 85.22 99.40 i NGT4 9.69 0.13 4.13 2.69 1.68 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.00 2.99 78.14 99.83 I NGT5 54.87 0.91 22.26 2.90 0.03 0.00 1.02 0.35 0.03 2.97 0.04 4.46 9.73 99.57 NGT6 53.86 0.91 17.70 4.16 0.99 0.02 1.53 0.39 0.22 3.22 0.08 2.82 14.33 100.23 NGT7 21.85 0.31 7.04 0.42 0.41 0.00 0.24 0.08 0.00 0.51 0.00 1.98 67.23 100.07 NGT8 9.10 0.16 2.91 0.22 0.44 0.00 0.06 0.03 0.00 0.17 0.00 2.78 84.02 99.89 NGT9 8.01 0.12 3.63 0.84 0.83 0.00 0.08 0.05 0.00 0.33 0.00 2.40 83.66 99.95 NGT10 51.60 0.86 21.41 2.70 0.64 0.00 0.95 0.32 0.04 2.64 0.05 4.12 14.34 99.67 NGT11 52.86 0.91 17.77 6.10 0.65 0.05 1.68 0.44 0.32 3.16 0.10 2.03 13.94 100.01 NGT12 16.02 0.18 6.47 1.43 0.94 0.00 0.23 0.09 0.00 0.39 0.00 1.77 72.56 100.08 NGT13 6.88 0.07 3.23 0.75 0.66 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.16 0.00 2.64 85.01 99.66 NGT14 21.32 0.28 6.05 1.16 0.79 0.00 0.28 0.01 0.02 1.04 0.00 1.96 67.44 100.35 L_ A2-21 I NGT15 52.94 0.87 21.48 3.22 0.05 0.01 1.16 0.35 0.08 3.01 0.04 4.29 11.64 99.14 I Table A2-41: Major element oxide concentrations for Kleinkopje Colliery (values presented as wt%) SiteName Si02 Ti02 Ah03 Fe203 S MnO MgO CaO Na20 K20 P20S H2O- LOl Total KK1 10.39 0.88 7.68 0.59 0.47 0.00 0.35 1.90 0.00 0.11 0.65 1.62 74.04 98.68 KK2 1.03 0.00 1.15 8.09 8.36 0.00 0.42 16.90 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.91 61.76 99.12 KK3 11.88 0.88 8.85 0.43 0.29 0.00 0.08 1.05 0.00 0.12 1.17 1.65 72.64 99.04 KK4 27.65 0.98 15.99 2.36 0.17 0.00 0.54 1.97 0.03 0.80 1.19 1.26 46.15 99.09 KK5 54.70 1.66 26.40 0.66 0.04 0.01 0.07 0.07 0.03 0.80 0.04 0.82 14.13 99.43 KK6 87.99 0.79 5.89 0.71 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.07 0.03 1.33 0.02 0.02 2.78 99.67 KK7 7.46 0.34 4.39 0.47 0.33 0.00 0.16 1.50 0.00 0.12 0.00 2.36 82.97 100.10 KK8 64.52 1.16 20.36 0.63 0.04 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.03 1.93 0.05 0.65 10.38 99.83 KK9 2.06 0.21 2.75 2.67 1.73 0.00 0.54 3.40 0.00 0.07 0.11 1.68 83.23 98.45 KK10 96.02 0.05 1.16 0.80 0.05 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.01 0.10 1.03 99.50 KK11 46.82 1.07 25.31 2.91 0.08 0.04 0.70 0.38 0.05 1.97 0.32 0.83 19.51 99.99 KK12 9.03 0.37 6.89 0.51 0.51 0.00 0.09 2.03 0.00 0.24 0.59 2.11 75.96 98.33 KK13 0.00 0.55 2.10 0.19 0.83 0.00 0.05 0.64 0.01 0.31 0.01 1.64 92.70 99.04 KK14 65.85 1.57 20.01 1.27 0.58 0.00 0.04 0.15 0.04 3.11 0.12 0.28 7.40 100.42 KK15 91.04 0.29 4.55 1.00 0.59 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.87 0.02 0.32 1.34 100.07 KK16 3.74 0.25 4.10 0.14 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.00 0.02 0.44 2.05 87.99 99.72 Table A2-42: Major element oxide concentrations for Khutala Colliery (values presented as wt%) Site Name Si02 Ti02 AI203 Fe203 S MnO MgO CaO Na20 K20 P20S H2O- LOl Total KHU1 4.98 0.19 5.99 2.07 1.30 0.00 0.30 1.62 0.00 0.07 0.00 3.11 80.42 100.05 KHU2 4.03 0.30 4.96 0.88 0.89 0.00 0.31 2.17 0.01 0.09 0.18 3.52 81.99 99.33 KHU3 3.46 0.19 5.11 0.50 0.61 0.00 0.64 4.33 0.02 0.10 1.38 2.14 81.34 99.81 KHU4 16.08 0.77 14.07 0.16 0.21 0.00 0.05 0.32 0.02 0.06 0.04 1.51 65.41 98.71 KHU5 10.45 0.76 8.78 0.75 0.65 0.00 0.19 1.25 0.00 0.15 0.07 11.33 65.54 99.92 KHU6 5.53 0.11 3.86 1.56 0.97 0.00 0.01 1.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.51 75.03 99.19 A2-22 KHU7 72.37 0.73 10.05 1.49 0.30 0.01 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.30 0.02 0.55 14.48 100.35 KHU8 5.58 0.16 4.87 5.75 3.40 0.00 0.10 1.54 0.00 0.04 0.00 12.01 65.88 99.33 KHU9 8.51 0.44 7.86 0.28 0.51 0.00 0.19 1.55 0.00 0.10 0.08 6.29 74.45 100.26 KHU10 4.73 0.44 5.12 0.71 0.67 0.00 0.63 3.95 0.00 0.07 0.07 3.29 78.36 98.04 KHU11 3.99 0.50 4.48 6.17 3.65 0.00 0.45 3.18 0.00 0.12 0.39 6.32 70.21 99.46 KHU12 14.72 0.55 6.97 0.70 0.65 0.00 0.86 4.24 0.01 0.48 0.20 9.66 60.65 99.69 KHU13 9.85 0.57 6.43 0.61 0.56 0.00 0.40 1.99 0.01 0.16 0.19 4.34 73.92 99.03 KHU14 14.23 0.45 7.57 0.32 0.64 0.00 0.27 1.98 0.01 0.36 0.85 10.62 62.42 99.72 KHU15 8.30 0.46 5.62 0.44 0.72 0.00 0.48 3.65 0.00 0.20 0.58 5.03 75.14 100.62 KHU16 2.58 0.22 3.66 0.08 0.85 0.00 0.02 1.81 0.00 0.12 0.91 5.06 84.33 99.64 I Table A2-43: Major element oxide concentrations for Koornfontein Colliery (values presented as wt%) SiteName Si02 Ti02 AI203 Fe203 S MnO MgO CaO Na20 K20 P20S H2O- LOl Total KOR1 5.83 0.21 3.88 0.59 0.59 0.00 0.40 2.16 0.23 0.16 0.07 2.32 81.65 98.09 KOR2 8.42 0.23 4.71 0.89 0.57 0.00 0.29 1.83 0.04 0.14 0.00 3.14 78.82 99.07 KOR3 12.27 0.42 5.66 0.36 0.31 0.00 0.27 1.53 0.03 0.10 0.00 3.16 74.63 98.73 KOR4 2.01 0.13 3.42 1.98 1.58 0.00 0.37 6.33 0.45 0.13 0.34 1.88 79.59 98.20 KOR5 4.73 0.26 3.78 0.74 0.56 0.00 0.39 3.12 0.06 0.10 0.45 3.06 80.97 98.21 KOR6 5.33 0.18 2.89 0.17 0.29 0.00 0.29 2.12 0.01 0.00 0.00 3.13 84.39 98.80 KOR7 5.99 0.34 6.08 0.53 0.52 0.00 0.37 1.48 0.07 0.21 0.05 2.01 81.64 99.29 KOR8 6.12 0.35 4.84 0.93 0.69 0.00 0.42 2.89 0.03 0.05 0.18 2.18 80.22 98.90 KOR9 8.91 0.27 4.79 3.81 1.68 0.00 0.36 1.42 0.01 0.08 0.00 1.75 75.99 99.07 KOR10 7.48 0.55 6.63 0.28 0.38 0.00 0.34 1.93 0.02 0.11 0.07 2.49 81.43 101.71 KORSST 43.34 0.79 13.08 5.22 0.07 0.16 6.12 8.42 1.71 0.62 0.11 1.36 19.74 100.74 KOR11 3.75 0.20 4.19 1.59 0.90 0.00 0.49 2.22 0.02 0.01 0.01 3.02 81.62 98.02 KOR12 15.62 0.44 6.74 0.64 0.48 0.00 0.37 1.55 0.02 0.16 0.00 2.25 70.81 99.08 KOR13 6.74 0.25 5.13 0.18 0.31 0.00 0.49 2.13 0.10 0.16 0.32 3.22 79.20 98.23 KOR14 4.47 0.29 5.03 1.44 0.82 0.00 0.36 2.38 0.02 0.05 0.21 3.36 81.45 99.88 KOR15 3.14 0.08 3.58 1.59 1.17 0.00 0.35 8.95 0.01 0.00 0.99 3.06 75.31 98.24 KOR16 0.56 0.19 2.59 2.57 1.12 0.00 0.12 1.22 0.01 0.08 0.20 2.28 87.45 98.40 - - _._------ A2-23 KOR17 6.08 0.21 3.93 0.57 0.55 0.00 0.20 1.32 0.01 0.05 0.00 2.18 83.31 98.41 KOR18 12.95 0.43 7.61 0.96 0.55 0.00 0.11 0.39 0.02 0.09 0.00 1.84 73.76 98.71 Table A2-44: Major element oxide concentrations for Kromdraai Colliery (values presented as wt%) SiteName Si02 Ti02 AI203 Fe203 5 MnO MgO CaO Na20 K20 P20S H2O. LOl Total KRD1 13.78 0.66 11.27 0.77 0.70 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.24 6.11 66.83 100.54 KRD2 9.65 0.50 8.23 1.95 1.22 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.20 0.22 10.47 66.67 99.12 KRD3 11.19 0.76 10.08 0.45 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.28 7.57 69.15 100.13 KR04 91.25 1.21 3.15 1.26 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.09 0.02 0.27 1.62 99.94 KR05 87.21 1.44 3.13 4.01 1.44 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.12 0.02 0.33 1.94 99.68 KRD6 4.01 0.45 4.63 0.26 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 5.94 84.08 99.97 KRD7 0.00 0.26 2.18 0.22 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 8.92 87.68 99.92 KRD8 5.57 0.34 4.69 0.80 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 2.22 83.78 98.20 KRD9 3.39 0.21 3.11 1.31 1.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 1.66 88.54 99.68 KRD10 6.11 0.45 6.65 1.76 1.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.14 2.28 81.20 99.87 KRD11 3.31 0.24 4.02 2.15 1.51 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.06 0.64 2.00 84.22 98.44 Table A2-45: Major element oxide concentrations for Lakeside Colliery (values presented as wt%) SiteName Si02 Ti02 AI203 Fe203 5 MnO MgO CaO Na20 K20 P20S H2O. LOl Total LK1 2.11 0.08 2.17 7.51 1.44 0.00 0.40 3.25 0.04 0.00 0.00 3.30 78.76 99.06 LK2 12.50 0.26 7.67 0.15 0.17 0.00 0.06 1.32 0.00 0.19 0.01 5.11 71.62 99.06 LK3 3.89 0.10 2.96 1.56 1.09 0.00 0.08 0.77 0.02 0.05 0.00 6.06 83.09 99.67 LK4 4.49 0.05 4.61 8.36 5.12 0.00 0.09 2.04 0.00 0.08 0.00 3.77 71.52 100.13 LK5 12.24 0.24 7.76 0.69 0.55 0.00 0.23 1.32 0.00 0.12 0.00 4.12 72.93 100.20 LK6 3.93 0.16 3.69 0.79 0.60 0.00 0.06 0.70 0.04 0.00 0.01 4.89 84.93 99.80 LK7 4.07 0.16 4.69 3.70 2.45 0.00 0.24 2.70 0.02 0.02 0.00 4.42 77.28 99.75 A2-24 Table A2-46: Major element oxide concentrations for Leeufontein Colliery (values presented as wt%) SiteName Si02 Ti02 AI203 Fe203 S MnO MgO CaO Na20 K20 P20S H2O- LOl Total LU1 5.00 0.20 3.48 0.92 0.64 0.00 0.08 0.89 0.04 0.04 0.00 4.38 82.37 98.04 LU2 3.87 0.13 3.10 0.11 0.32 0.00 0.09 0.80 0.00 0.04 0.00 4.76 86.02 99.24 LU3 0.32 0.11 1.93 1.05 1.10 0.00 0.15 5.48 0.00 0.01 0.00 5.26 83.92 99.33 LU4 1.88 0.08 2.42 0.03 0.39 0.00 0.26 1.44 0.00 0.01 0.00 3.79 89.08 99.38 LU5 50.88 1.08 29.00 1.67 0.13 0.03 1.76 6.12 0.00 0.40 0.06 0.19 7.85 99.17 LU6 4.12 0.15 3.07 1.00 0.91 0.00 0.45 2.77 0.05 0.01 0.01 4.95 81.87 99.36 LU7 32.77 0.95 6.80 0.13 0.23 0.00 0.07 0.13 0.04 0.08 0.02 3.54 53.82 98.58 LU8 33.81 1.36 9.76 0.32 0.26 0.00 0.11 0.14 0.02 0.28 0.03 3.72 49.92 99.73 LU9 4.20 0.12 3.00 0.71 0.60 0.00 0.24 1.50 0.01 0.03 0.00 3.85 85.29 99.55 LU10 4.18 0.22 2.57 0.31 0.43 0.00 0.14 1.40 0.00 0.04 0.00 5.50 84.33 99.12 LU11 9.74 0.36 4.85 0.34 0.35 0.00 0.20 1.35 0.00 0.04 0.01 5.75 75.47 98.46 LU13 4.32 0.14 2.76 0.08 0.55 0.00 0.04 0.67 0.01 0.07 0.00 3.64 87.31 99.59 LU14 2.21 0.10 2.37 4.89 3.23 0.00 0.79 4.33 0.00 0.01 0.00 3.22 77.91 99.06 LU15 6.40 0.26 4.70 0.15 0.28 0.00 0.32 1.86 0.02 0.04 0.00 5.24 80.65 99.92 LU16 8.82 0.28 5.23 0.14 0.31 0.00 0.37 0.99 0.00 0.18 0.00 4.98 79.06 100.36 LU17 2.46 0.33 3.81 1.47 1.10 0.00 0.35 3.20 0.03 0.04 0.20 4.80 82.05 99.84 LU18 2.85 0.41 3.08 0.06 0.31 0.00 0.06 0.42 0.04 0.03 0.00 5.80 86.28 99.34 LU19 0.00 0.10 1.85 6.27 4.36 0.00 0.23 2.72 0.04 0.03 0.03 3.17 81.09 99.89 LU20 0.27 0.05 2.18 3.73 2.61 0.00 0.19 2.28 0.03 0.02 0.00 3.01 84.68 99.05 LU21 30.03 1.24 15.42 0.27 0.15 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.04 0.05 0.00 3.17 47.89 98.33 LU22 5.67 0.20 3.99 0.08 0.22 0.00 0.07 0.74 0.04 0.02 0.00 4.88 83.52 99.43 LU23 4.09 0.12 3.16 1.61 1.07 0.00 0.24 1.62 0.03 0.00 0.00 3.07 84.92 99.9.3 LU24 0.51 0.16 2.97 0.86 0.92 0.00 0.13 1.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.46 89.01 99.95 LU25 3.32 0.20 4.64 3.83 2.26 0.00 0.77 2.65 0.00 0.02 0.14 4.58 77.51 99.92 LU26 0.00 0.11 2.60 1.33 1.17 0.00 0.22 1.90 0.00 0.08 0.24 4.73 87.22 99.60 LU27 9.14 0.70 8.18 0.16 0.31 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.00 0.19 0.12 6.06 74.66 99.67 LU28 7.48 0.41 6.98 0.96 0.99 0.00 0.42 1.87 0.00 0.10 0.23 5.17 75.05 99.66 LU29 3.79 0.47 4.82 0.13 0.40 0.00 0.13 0.87 0.00 0.18 0.10 4.45 84.60 99.94 --- - - _.- ---- A2-25 LU30 0.00 0.17 2.24 2.03 1.27 0.00 0.23 1.46 0.00 0.08 0.00 4.72 87.27 99.47 LUP1 3.44 0.46 4.33 2.37 1.97 0.00 0.03 1.08 0.00 0.15 0.00 6.26 79.61 99.70 LUP2 0.00 0.15 1.62 2.76 2.15 0.00 0.06 1.92 0.00 0.03 0.05 7.59 83.68 100.01 LUP3 0.00 0.20 0.44 0.68 0.97 0.00 0.28 3.54 0.00 0.03 0.00 3.36 90.13 99.63 LUP4 6.93 0.37 6.75 1.06 1.32 0.00 0.05 0.32 0.00 0.56 0.53 6.32 75.72 99.93 Table A2-47: Major element oxide concentrations for Middelburg Colliery (values presented as wt%) SiteName Si02 Ti02 AI203 Fe203 S MnO MgO CaO Na20 K20 P20S H2O. LOl Total M1 17.01 0.73 8.38 2.75 0.72 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 1.33 66.88 98.01 M2 7.89 0.37 4.40 1.85 0.68 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.08 0.00 1.30 83.08 99.68 M3 87.98 0.55 6.30 0.95 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.58 0.02 0.25 2.83 99.52 M4 77.01 0.56 10.71 0.94 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.20 0.01 0.58 0.02 0.37 9.33 99.78 M5 10.09 0.50 6.12 1.48 0.80 0.00 0.47 2.03 0.00 0.15 0.00 1.62 75.36 98.63 M6 15.62 1.24 9.56 0.46 0.22 0.00 0.19 0.75 0.01 0.18 0.00 2.64 67.86 98.73 M7 6.47 0.50 5.70 1.74 0.45 0.00 0.21 1.21 0.00 0.17 0.06 2.81 78.91 98.23 M8 8.09 0.37 7.51 3.33 1.37 0.00 0.21 0.65 0.00 0.11 0.02 2.32 74.56 98.54 M9 11.63 0.70 9.53 0.68 0.45 0.00 0.11 0.48 0.00 0.12 0.53 2.34 73.02 99.59 M10 37.49 1.54 31.06 1.05 0.24 0.01 0.24 0.10 0.00 0.52 0.23 1.68 25.77 99.93 M11 11.30 0.48 5.50 0.55 0.27 0.00 0.08 0.55 0.00 0.14 0.00 1.59 79.28 99.74 M12 10.73 0.38 5.45 1.22 0.72 0.00 0.08 1.57 0.01 0.15 0.00 1.54 76.37 98.22 M13 79.19 0.38 4.42 1.63 0.19 0.03 1.39 3.23 0.25 0.47 0.01 0.35 8.71 100.25 M14 12.76 0.33 7.65 0.35 0.41 0.00 0.20 1.34 0.03 0.08 0.00 1.69 75.51 100.35 M15 2.79 0.35 3.87 0.98 0.74 0.00 0.10 0.75 0.03 0.04 0.00 2.19 87.66 99.50 M16 3.71 0.36 4.51 2.90 1.73 0.00 0.41 2.40 0.03 0.06 0.24 3.22 80.29 99.86 M17 4.50 0.22 4.92 0.36 0.51 0.00 0.23 4.69 0.00 0.13 1.42 3.18 80.07 100.23 M18 8.96 0.26 3.77 0.60 0.46 0.00 0.34 2.68 0.00 0.07 0.00 4.16 78.33 99.63 M19 16.69 0.47 5.83 3.80 0.72 0.00 0.10 0.35 0.00 0.17 0.00 5.11 66.56 99.80 M20 7.59 0.21 3.19 4.68 2.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.01 0.95 80.30 100.05 M21 77.48 0.69 12.20 1.10 0.24 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.06 2.82 0.03 0.49 4.77 99.92 M22 62.16 0.90 18.73 3.00 0.45 0.02 0.43 0.11 0.04 2.81 0.06 0.73 10.99 100.43 A2-26 Table A2-48: Major element oxide concentrations for Optimum Colliery (values presented as wt%) SiteName Si02 Ti02 AI203 Fe203 S MnO MgO CaO Na20 K20 P20S H2O. LOl Total OPT1 15.94 0.27 6.88 7.38 4.11 0.00 0.08 0.02 0.00 0.24 0.00 4.95 58.44 98.31 OPT2 0.00 0.14 1.45 0.21 0.77 0.00 0.03 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.10 94.72 99.85 OPT3 79.66 0.70 11.28 0.48 0.01 0.01 1.01 0.03 0.10 2.94 0.05 0.23 3.42 99.92 OPT4 7.23 0.25 4.52 0.35 0.62 0.00 0.51 1.33 0.00 0.06 0.00 8.32 76.31 99.50 OPT5 4.03 0.09 2.83 0.30 0.61 0.00 0.12 0.42 0.00 0.07 0.00 2.65 87.66 98.78 OPT6 14.35 0.38 7.30 0.20 0.41 0.00 0.03 0.16 0.00 0.17 0.01 2.46 72.95 98.42 OPT7 3.43 0.19 2.75 0.04 0.59 0.00 0.08 1.15 0.00 0.12 0.06 2.63 87.41 98.45 OPTS 69.03 0.36 5.28 9.20 2.70 0.04 0.18 3.96 0.03 1.05 0.03 0.26 7.73 99.85 OPT9 7.24 0.30 4.36 0.08 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.02 4.07 82.60 99.15 OPT10 7.65 0.33 5.43 0.09 0.23 0.00 0.13 0.41 0.00 0.09 0.09 4.47 81.51 100.43 OPT11 89.35 0.44 4.73 1.38 0.38 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.78 0.02 0.16 2.81 100.11 OPT12 11.01 0.78 4.51 0.15 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.04 3.11 79.61 99.91 , OPT13 7.74 0.34 4.34 0.11 0.48 0.00 0.33 0.88 0.00 0.10 0.00 2.46 83.07 99.85 Table A2-49: Major element oxide concentrations for Rietspruit Colliery (values presented as wt%) SiteName Si02 Ti02 AI203 Fe203 S MnO MgO CaO Na20 K20 P20S H2O. LOl Total R2RO 53.64 1.06 22.35 2.01 0.14 0.01 0.56 0.37 0.54 1.61 0.10 1.10 15.95 99.44 R2M 7.35 0.33 5.92 0.36 0.40 0.00 0.07 1.87 0.00 0.10 1.40 2.47 78.05 98.32 R2M2 3.63 0.10 3.68 1.52 1.57 0.00 0.14 6.08 0.00 0.13 0.65 2.47 78.80 98.77 R2LW 2.34 0.21 3.97 0.30 0.49 0.00 0.44 2.77 0.04 0.05 0.93 3.24 84.02 98.80 R4UROOF 53.88 0.93 20.00 2.43 0.41 0.02 0.76 0.16 0.21 2.35 0.06 0.85 17.29 99.35 R4U 27.63 0.37 11.21 0.92 1.06 0.00 0.31 0.52 0.03 0.56 0.00 1.73 54.44 98.78 R4PT 53.74 0.95 23.10 0.58 0.26 0.01 0.29 0.17 0.61 1.25 0.04 0.99 17.23 99.22 R4L 10.77 0.45 5.06 0.38 0.74 0.00 0.37 1.39 0.00 0.13 0.09 2.26 77.78 99.42 R4FUG 80.67 1.59 8.99 0.54 0.54 0.01 0.00 0.05 1.38 0.16 0.02 0.27 5.56 99.78 R4FLG 75.43 3.84 5.03 6.10 0.34 0.20 0.50 0.35 1.55 0.25 0.03 0.20 6.38 100.20 R4F1 63.67 3.55 17.22 1.95 0.24 0.05 0.15 0.14 1.48 0.27 0.02 0.73 10.47 99.94 - - -- A2-27 R4F2 52.73 5.68 25.73 1.48 0.05 0.03 0.24 0.15 1.75 0.87 0.03 0.94 10.07 99.75 R4F3 73.17 1.98 10.37 2.39 0.79 0.06 0.16 0.14 1.30 0.32 0.02 0.59 9.44 100.73 Table A2-50: Major element oxide concentrations for South Witbank Colliery (values presented as wt%) SiteName Si02 Ti02 AI203 Fe203 S MnO MgO CaO Na20 K20 P20S H2O' LOl Total SW1 8.75 0.23 5.45 1.90 1.66 0.00 0.32 3.59 0.16 0.08 0.21 7.31 70.28 99.94 SW2 17.37 0.46 8.17 0.18 0.52 0.00 0.28 1.82 0.14 0.08 0.03 2.41 66.85 98.31 SW3 16.01 0.49 7.63 0.20 0.61 0.00 0.24 1.69 0.16 0.11 0.09 2.58 68.23 98.04 i SW4 7.62 0.35 3.88 0.14 0.72 0.00 0.32 2.88 0.08 0.07 0.70 3.42 78.23 98.40 SW5 11.75 0.33 5.32 2.11 1.77 0.00 0.52 3.35 0.06 0.13 0.41 2.66 70.60 99.01 SW6 20.90 0.65 8.68 0.66 0.65 0.00 0.30 1.43 0.09 0.22 0.03 2.73 61.78 98.12 SW7 6.54 0.26 4.25 0.55 0.90 0.00 0.32 2.56 0.09 0.11 1.04 9.66 73.52 99.80 SW8 4.93 0.23 3.13 1.00 1.20 0.00 0.42 3.38 0.09 0.11 1.00 2.94 80.39 98.82 SW9 9.86 0.33 4.69 0.33 0.81 0.00 0.30 2.19 0.07 0.19 0.74 2.79 77.58 99.88 SW10 5.53 0.22 4.71 1.60 1.65 0.00 0.29 3.79 0.08 0.05 0.37 2.98 77.21 98.48 Table A2-51: Major element oxide concentrations for Tavistock Colliery (values presented as wt%) SiteName Si02 Ti02 AI203 Fe203 S MnO MgO CaO Na20 K20 P20S H2O' LOl Total TAV1A 6.50 0.11 3.84 1.82 1.69 0.00 0.60 5.13 0.00 0.10 1.82 2.38 74.79 98.78 TAV18 4.28 0.11 4.15 0.25 0.64 0.00 0.39 4.01 0.00 0.12 3.07 3.08 79.69 99.79 TAV1C 3.48 0.14 3.38 3.28 2.35 0.00 0.23 3.55 0.00 0.06 2.06 2.43 78.76 99.72 TAV2A 6.29 0.24 4.11 0.14 0.64 0.00 0.30 3.36 0.00 0.08 2.01 2.02 80.78 99.97 TAV28 6.69 0.22 4.66 0.56 0.84 0.00 0.45 4.54 0.00 0.08 1.72 2.39 76.32 98.47 TAV2C 10.74 0.52 5.33 0.19 0.56 0.00 0.41 1.89 0.00 0.10 0.21 2.50 77.18 99.63 TAV3A 8.21 0.23 2.84 1.30 1.01 0.00 0.24 1.53 0.00 0.01 0.08 2.36 80.83 98.64 TAV38 8.58 0.28 3.47 0.36 0.64 0.00 0.25 2.02 0.00 0.02 0.07 2.52 80.39 98.60 TAV3C 5.79 0.14 3.16 4.86 3.26 0.00 0.49 4.26 0.00 0.00 0.08 5.96 70.84 98.84 TAV4A 53.87 1.02 23.25 0.64 0.06 0.01 0.18 0.13 0.04 1.35 0.04 1.08 17.52 99.19 TAV4B 53.90 1.04 23.17 0.65 0.07 0.00 0.18 0.09 0.04 1.43 0.04 1.12 17.66 99.39 TAV4C 53.87 1.03 23.15 0.63 0.06 0.01 0.22 0.10 0.04 1.39 0.04 1.15 17.44 99.13 A2-28 TAV5A 5.98 0.61 4.43 0.98 1.36 0.00 0.14 1.65 0.00 0.37 1.10 2.89 80.35 99.86 ! TAV5B 10.32 0.56 7.86 0.67 1.09 0.00 0.29 1.48 0.00 0.42 0.98 2.38 74.09 100.15 I TAV5C 11.04 0.47 7.02 0.64 1.00 0.00 0.21 0.74 0.00 0.38 0.62 2.60 74.97 99.69 TAV6A 5.64 0.26 3.62 1.04 1.29 0.00 0.30 3.32 0.00 0.14 0.80 2.76 79.09 98.26 TAV6B 5.62 0.29 5.22 0.35 0.77 0.00 0.33 2.42 0.00 0.14 0.65 2.23 81.66 99.68 TAV6C 5.49 0.31 4.95 0.76 0.99 0.00 0.35 2.42 0.00 0.15 0.77 3.47 80.11 99.77 TAV7A 6.04 0.33 3.79 2.05 1.49 0.00 0.48 2.52 0.00 0.07 0.23 2.83 78.30 98.13 TAV7C 23.58 0.83 12.89 0.16 0.32 0.00 0.18 0.20 0.03 0.28 0.01 2.22 59.22 99.92 Table A2-52: Major element oxide concentrations for Union Colliery (values presented as wt%) SiteName Si02 Ti02 AI203 Fe203 S MnO MgO CaO Na20 K20 P20S H2O' LOl Total UN1 6.59 0.29 4.44 0.75 1.28 0.00 0.10 1.25 0.00 0.12 0.04 2.83 81.90 99.59 UN2 5.96 0.32 4.35 0.68 1.05 0.00 0.11 0.98 0.00 0.12 0.04 3.36 82.75 99.72 UN3 6.27 0.25 4.35 0.96 0.88 0.00 0.02 0.52 0.00 0.12 0.02 4.34 81.08 98.81 UN4 6.65 0.24 4.25 0.67 0.78 0.00 0.02 0.51 0.00 0.12 0.01 5.64 80.53 99.42 UN5B 7.16 0.25 3.87 0.67 0.86 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.20 0.00 2.46 83.32 98.95 UN6B 5.79 0.25 3.47 0.64 0.93 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.10 0.00 4.79 83.44 99.50 A2-29 Table A2-53: Trace element concentrations for Arnot Colliery (values presented as ppm) SiteName Mn Rb Ba Sr Zr Nb y Sc Cr Cu V Zn Ni Co ARA1 - 28.90 393.20 109.10 360.00 19.20 30.20 35.80 89.00 136.10 481.80 112.70 119.40 94.60 ARA2 - 29.70 318.30 78.70 389.80 11.40 25.00 33.20 528.10 89.70 657.80 145.40 102.50 76.50 ARA3 - 21.00 244.40 42.10 210.50 12.30 3.60 11.80 257.70 12.90 336.40 27.60 20.20 7.70 ARA4 - 0.80 200.40 60.00 182.60 9.30 7.50 25.90 307.90 64.10 403.10 31.70 50.00 16.70 ARA5 63.59 1.87 77.53 81.22 48.67 3.48 40.44 6.67 27.17 9.81 24.82 7.28 38.22 - ARA6 - 38.60 285.10 62.20 229.10 11.40 15.20 8.80 174.90 13.60 72.30 44.80 19.40 7.10 ARA7 - 41.70 315.80 85.20 250.70 15.60 25.20 27.10 201.70 20.90 185.80 116.10 39.60 5.40 ARA8 - 31.90 278.70 82.20 235.30 13.90 24.70 17.50 140.70 21.50 134.80 67.50 37.70 6.80 ARA9 99.48 3.61 202.54 158.02 79.02 9.01 14.94 10.85 43.50 7.53 48.49 10.55 34.81 - ARA10 89.49 3.61 293.05 239.42 59.73 7.96 11.87 7.51 27.77 6.99 17.37 32.22 14.15 - ARA11 - 17.10 145.80 34.10 268.80 15.60 7.10 9.90 268.60 11.60 142.50 110.60 45.70 22.30 ARA12 - 30.50 221.80 49.20 228.60 14.40 27.40 11.30 89.90 22.00 115.00 89.70 26.40 0.00 ARA13 0.00 10.40 255.09 114.56 116.17 5.93 43.56 23.78 150.80 21.80 191.91 56.77 26.85 - ARA14 - 32.30 346.50 62.30 168.30 10.60 6.20 18.20 171.00 26.10 215.20 33.60 27.40 6.30 ARA15 15.77 21.62 167.48 103.48 155.14 10.73 43.75 21.90 87.62 17.17 86.32 10.52 14.57 - ARA16 - 126.30 605.40 117.30 248.10 14.50 16.70 6.50 35.20 1.50 46.80 33.00 18.50 4.40 ARB1 - 33.70 224.40 57.50 190.90 17.50 16.10 12.50 187.20 24.10 194.50 56.70 382.20 69.10 ARB2 34.18 9.15 231.88 98.39 103.58 10.33 27.95 11.47 110.22 46.01 111.20 15.60 51.66 - ARB3 - 37.40 271.20 135.30 237.30 12.60 15.60 9.50 162.70 2.90 58.10 36.10 25.30 4.50 ARB4 - 27.10 257.60 103.10 205.40 12.20 14.00 13.40 122.50 8.30 95.70 44.60 20.00 0.70 ARB5 59.59 18.61 309.79 140.54 103.13 6.75 15.19 12.20 123.32 12.87 109.52 18.73 61.51 - ARB6 - 27.00 209.50 319.40 160.80 11.10 12.00 7.40 79.10 6.60 28.50 30.00 20.90 6.80 ARB7 88.74 2.56 200.70 118.99 42.13 7.51 4.63 4.17 57.34 4.52 66.63 10.34 21.76 - ARB8 - 6.60 95.90 31.70 119.20 8.20 0.60 1.50 87.00 3.00 103.40 38.50 32.60 6.90 ARB9 - 25.70 260.70 50.60 248.10 13.70 18.60 12.20 131.20 20.20 166.00 60.80 32.50 8.90 ARB10 0.00 9.03 168.40 85.22 91.95 7.23 38.32 18.98 41.91 15.64 64.90 15.51 37.87 - ARB11 - 51.70 236.50 62.90 151.90 16.90 9.80 18.90 109.60 30.20 129.40 32.40 27.50 5.10 ARB13 - 143.00 538.30 207.10 359.00 19.80 30.10 18.40 68.20 5.50 74.70 77.90 16.90 16.50 ARC1 - 5.80 247.40 51.70 232.40 8.50 15.50 36.40 412.80 42.00 542.70 66.90 69.00 21.40 --- A2-30 ARC2 139.86 4.92 157.12 112.85 83.68 3.43 40.94 13.45 105.94 15.44 86.24 26.48 60.72 - ARC3 - 34.50 223.10 61.60 336.70 13.90 19.50 7.70 178.00 6.30 69.30 47.20 17.00 5.10 ARC4 - 38.80 317.80 50.90 224.70 12.60 183.60 16.40 152.60 19.50 17.50 43.60 37.90 7.00 ARC5 63.22 5.68 270.30 116.35 33.12 4.95 9.05 3.23 15.37 13.75 23.90 10.14 38.54 - ARC6 103.67 2.07 236.15 96.66 80.86 9.28 13.90 7.30 33.79 6.39 24.55 11.54 5.59 - ARC7 - 4.60 134.20 45.70 142.50 10.30 0.80 3.80 130.60 7.00 298.10 24.90 48.40 10.10 AR01 - 2.00 251.50 49.10 243.00 5.20 23.20 24.80 341.30 20.40 335.00 50.10 43.40 21.30 ARD2 117.44 6.11 156.03 101.34 113.18 6.00 44.86 17.73 233.61 18.03 174.29 23.99 61.46 - AR03 - 29.40 186.40 208.80 181.60 10.10 14.00 8.60 101.60 3.30 39.60 21.60 32.60 1.90 AR04 - 38.40 300.60 58.60 191.70 11.40 37.60 20.20 167.60 19.60 135.00 82.50 27.40 6.10 ARD5 33.51 2.40 256.08 91.20 101.17 10.47 22.24 9.80 39.87 5.66 32.92 8.84 19.15 - I ARD6 269.78 6.77 173.14 122.53 87.72 7.41 12.31 6.47 109.58 19.98 654.02 45.93 19.32 - I AR07 - 0.00 174.60 70.10 113.80 9.00 1.30 7.90 171.30 10.20 1276.00 76.20 6.70 3.50 Table A2-54: Trace element concentrations for Arnot-North Colliery (values presented as ppm) SiteName Mn Rb Ba Sr Zr Nb Y Sc Cr Cu V Zn Ni Co 3936 - 93.50 461.40 320.10 320.10 25.20 57.10 23.20 232.40 42.70 187.90 110.10 59.60 36.50 3937 - 98.70 387.20 132.70 350.80 23.10 58.10 25.00 183.00 30.70 154.40 88.80 30.70 26.00 3938 194.23 0.00 6.50 14.60 19.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.30 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.20 - 3939 - 27.70 783.90 435.00 210.30 13.50 24.50 25.00 276.50 29.80 270.40 66.70 45.70 29.00 3940 - 89.80 310.50 88.60 300.70 17.40 31.00 12.90 361.40 49.20 237.70 112.70 38.90 16.50 3941 - 119.70 495.50 165.10 302.40 19.90 58.50 28.20 65.20 34.00 85.00 135.20 7.50 53.90 3942 - 135.90 551.30 190.50 317.10 22.40 62.40 20.50 179.60 50.20 211.50 146.30 57.00 42.40 3943 - 73.70 467.70 641.20 226.30 22.50 61.00 26.40 215.30 54.60 204.10 150.40 69.40 54.90 3944 - 92.70 371.70 167.30 345.40 24.30 45.50 17.00 125.70 36.80 135.90 135.00 54.00 64.30 3945 117.62 0.00 310.40 136.70 75.50 0.00 0.00 14.50 156.30 0.00 102.50 22.10 15.50 - 3946 - 37.60 330.20 75.40 594.60 24.70 19.40 15.90 752.80 29.50 338.20 71.10 42.40 23.90 3947 - 76.80 364.10 52.90 347.60 18.00 25.10 11.10 371.30 20.40 178.70 87.10 24.10 15.70 3948 - 166.00 450.60 142.60 312.20 27.60 48.00 21.60 178.00 47.40 206.30 248.70 86.40 69.40 3949 - 51.30 362.10 372.60 474.20 28.50 62.80 23.00 218.90 36.90 148.50 70.20 45.60 23.20 3950 - 27.30 427.60 180.70 283.80 18.70 35.90 22.10 261.20 30.00 578.40 95.10 68.50 33.60 3951 98.65 0.00 272.20 63.10 119.50 1.10 0.10 14.50 260.20 0.00 198.50 26.40 47.50 - --- A2-31 3952 - 25.60 222.30 53.70 360.70 20.20 18.60 18.40 429.30 30.70 1018.70 89.30 46.40 14.90 3953 - 92.30 336.60 76.80 312.80 19.50 41.20 17.70 171.70 47.50 151.10 104.40 33.40 40.00 3954 - 60.00 593.50 361.80 431.90 9.30 229.50 37.10 239.90 92.90 134.80 68.20 59.40 16.50 3955 237.44 0.00 457.70 119.00 135.60 0.40 37.90 31.40 544.10 4.60 684.40 32.50 46.00 - 3956 - 20.10 194.70 45.60 142.00 12.90 11.80 6.50 149.20 9.20 329.80 22.20 17.80 1.10 3957 215.67 30.20 370.60 80.00 328.30 14.80 34.70 20.20 491.40 29.50 594.00 74.00 63.70 - 3958 - 51.30 385.80 88.70 383.90 25.50 22.50 13.10 489.40 19.80 241.70 62.10 51.60 21.00 3959 - 16.10 227.40 63.50 391.40 15.60 31.30 27.30 285.80 27.50 362.00 52.90 37.80 16.60 Table A2-55: Trace element concentrations for Bank Colliery (values presented as ppm) SiteName Mn Rb Ba Sr Zr Nb y Sc Cr Cu V Zn Ni Co BAN1 78.64 5.48 652.38 407.09 17.82 4.97 7.19 3.13 1.03 6.44 12.96 5.39 8.00 - BAN2 80.13 7.22 734.42 482.43 23.54 4.86 7.58 6.67 11.59 8.20 17.93 7.74 8.68 - BAN3 63.07 12.81 802.73 646.05 40.12 4.70 21.26 7.30 15.52 9.78 25.06 11.99 14.20 - BAN4 110.52 3.46 524.21 540.07 9.90 4.56 7.30 4.48 8.80 7.74 13.85 3.30 12.81 - BAN5 82.83 4.88 421.63 88.31 86.87 10.06 12.74 7.51 32.15 6.02 26.06 2.86 8.08 - BAN6 108.91 3.62 413.80 213.10 40.37 7.39 5.71 1.15 5.46 5.83 16.99 2.13 8.54 - BAN7 91.62 5.83 307.75 148.11 233.50 17.21 30.44 12.72 71.98 9.37 54.45 8.32 24.55 - BAN8 142.96 6.00 865.77 172.14 42.73 6.60 4.81 4.17 0.00 6.82 14.88 17.97 33.56 - BAN9 143.49 5.57 932.92 613.00 0.00 3.44 2.51 2.81 2.92 8.51 13.75 3.49 24.33 - BAN10 - 57.80 530.70 527.70 256.10 17.70 38.60 24.60 218.50 34.70 178.50 127.70 51.30 27.60 BAN11 - 138.80 257.20 54.70 225.40 16.90 23.30 14.70 142.10 5.10 72.20 60.50 12.80 3.70 BAN12 0.00 13.96 24.38 17.34 43.09 7.59 4.46 1.67 2.12 6.41 18.50 1.36 0.00 - BAN13 0.00 5.56 0.00 2.85 44.31 6.56 2.52 0.10 0.00 7.32 11.13 2.53 0.00 - BAN14 - 204.60 188.40 113.20 159.80 11.30 78.80 17.70 51.30 3.60 35.20 38.00 15.30 127.00 BAN15 - 139.90 246.70 68.70 200.70 15.60 22.10 16.10 166.80 5.70 66.70 59.60 19.50 6.50 BAN16 0.00 6.55 0.00 3.76 42.26 6.81 3.09 1.46 0.00 9.93 9.40 0.88 0.00 - BAN17 0.00 15.26 6.50 9.12 79.46 13.99 8.63 3.44 0.58 9.51 18.64 4.77 0.00 - BAN18 - 388.40 315.10 93.10 293.20 10.00 32.60 21.60 103.50 5.40 86.20 83.50 34.60 36.10 BAN19 36.20 2.94 524.79 184.85 98.71 10.22 18.49 10.64 44.65 9.53 31.03 4.53 10.90 - BAN20 61.05 3.90 712.45 355.64 100.37 11.65 18.24 9.07 3.45 10.19 36.57 4.30 7.29 - A2-32 I BAN21 nn68~:t9 ---4.60 830.46 584.36 58.94 6.82 15.27 8.13 25.43 14.17 25.55 3.62 9.55 - I Table A2-56: Trace element concentrations for Bankfontein Colliery (values presented as ppm) SiteName Mn Rb Ba Sr Zr Nb Y Sc Cr Cu V Zn Ni Co BK1 5.92 0.00 392.35 448.17 41.24 8.83. 12.04 3.32 27.37 11.02 20.55 3.89 17.54 - BK2 106.40 0.00 25.76 286.29 34.28 7.19 16.91 2.99 0.00 8.48 1.29 3.13 32.68 - BK3 3.75 19.72 51.43 18.34 328.47 15.68 9.38 0.23 65.71 9.37 40.14 26.10 28.50 - Table A2-57: Trace element concentrations for Borehole 1 (values presented as ppm) SiteName Mn Rb Ba Sr Zr Nb y Sc Cr Cu V Zn Ni Co BH1-1 75.98 94.60 204.56 118.78 248.29 14.91 23.86 10.43 52.37 24.87 51.70 71.27 34.27 - BH1-2 21.01 38.54 117.58 105.80 176.78 10.93 26.35 10.95 40.51 15.31 43.40 21.27 5.58 - BH1-3 - 30.80 113.90 107.90 108.50 9.50 6.90 1.30 46.10 4.80 5.50 16.10 11.90 14.20 BH1-4 85.15 16.78 3950.45 3962.84 0.00 0.00 33.98 7.72 20.65 27.38 16.91 17.79 11.03 - BH1-5 92.26 11.60 1491.04 1035.59 4.90 4.29 10.14 8.45 27.02 19.86 27.60 10.60 9.42 - BH1-6 115.42 11.28 1539.55 793.86 44.94 4.86 19.10 8.13 25.83 12.73 35.06 9.50 12.41 - BH1-7 - 54.60 446.70 112.90 459.10 18.20 19.60 10.60 81.50 9.80 90.10 37.80 18.20 0.80 ---_._------ Table A2-58: Trace element concentrations for Borehole wedge 1 (values presented as ppm) SiteName Mn Rb Ba Sr Zr Nb y Sc Cr Cu V Zn Ni Co BHW1-1 - 87.90 432.10 120.40 127.50 7.70 8.70 5.80 42.30 0.00 34.30 19.50 5.80 0.40 BHW1-2 - 91.10 447.40 113.60 187.90 9.90 10.20 3.10 51.10 0.00 50.00 28.80 7.50 5.20 BHW1-3 - 74.60 364.30 267.00 179.20 9.00 11.70 5.40 42.50 0.00 41.50 17.40 5.40 0.40 BHW1-4 - 119.50 312.60 148.70 209.90 18.40 34.60 18.40 126.90 7.80 101.90 76.60 28.10 66.80 BHW1-5 - 63.70 238.30 253.80 247.20 14.30 25.40 7.00 106.10 6.20 54.70 23.80 15.30 18.80 BHW1-6 55.55 6.60 178.46 159.69 103.59 3.68 93.76 8.66 58.54 15.69 53.21 6.05 23.87 - BtIW1-7 112.13 5.81 257.81 365.33 80.00 7.24 44.02 10.01 32.70 17.99 32.36 2.10 22.42 - BHW1-8 186.18 4.15 331.73 612.99 33.83 3.49 37.20 7.40 44.45 14.56 32.16 1.24 10.44 - BHW1-9 132.07 2.84 228.30 235.55 59.16 0.00 155.66 9.91 87.97 9.22 44.31 1.60 24.22 - BHW1-10 - 19.90 187.50 59.20 147.90 11.10 49.30 13.40 149.00 0.00 129.90 18.10 26.00 9.10 A2-33 BHW1-11 78.60 420.30 91.80 58.80 J 73.90 0.00 76.30 38.80 20.10 1.00 BHW1-12 72.10 459.10 75.50 143.50 12.4u 6.30 38.50 0.00 42.10 20.00 10.90 0.00 Table A2-59: Trace element concentrations for Borehole wedge 2 (values presented as ppm) SiteName Mn Rb Ba Sr Zr Nb y Sc Cr Cu V Zn Ni Co BHW2-1 - 92.50 423.00 115.00 130.70 8.60 8.50 2.90 51.90 1.90 37.60 20.90 9.60 3.50 BHW2-2 3.91 65.25 235.16 154.48 216.21 21.52 44.67 11.26 45.15 39.09 70.01 31.26 20.09 - BHW2-3 6.49 47.57 183.95 152.03 195.71 7.40 33.99 6.05 46.14 38.78 78.95 29.02 30.24 - BHW2-4 - 143.80 389.20 91.30 605.80 22.90 44.60 12.20 136.00 10.10 95.50 58.20 32.50 8.90 BHW2-5 - 97.50 424.30 158.90 183.30 13.70 20.90 11.50 121.90 15.20 81.50 19.40 16.40 23.40 BHW2-6 31.86 7.91 173.09 139.11 137.06 12.46 23.55 8.45 24.33 18.36 38.57 2.92 6.91 - BHW2-7 172.90 4.90 333.80 434.91 34.56 5.29 10.36 6.47 9.74 8.93 9.40 0.77 2.70 - BHW2-8 248.56 3.96 291.34 918.37 0.00 3.57 2.78 6.67 30.56 14.28 18.39 2.88 64.02 - BHW2-9 - 35.90 294.10 88.00 209.20 19.50 3.80 14.50 232.60 2.60 165.00 34.80 37.30 11.20 Table A2-60: Trace element concentrations for Borehole wedge 3 (values presented as ppm) SiteName Mn Rb Ba Sr Zr Nb Y Sc Cr Cu V Zn Ni Co BHW3-1 - 77.70 365.70 76.60 275.10 8.10 9.60 2.20 47.30 0.00 24.40 6.80 5.10 0.00 BHW3-2 40.28 11.51 269.11 163.43 138.14 5.56 39.33 18.15 133.88 13.45 140.88 8.66 1.36 - BHW3-3 - 161.90 276.90 110.90 122.60 6.50 15.00 8.60 91.00 3.00 55.90 13.50 12.20 38.00 BHW3-4 61.05 11.97 98.43 150.55 93.95 5.73 13.91 5.63 18.90 9.75 27.55 14.42 1.65 - I BHW3-5 - 145.70 359.60 142.00 189.40 8.70 23.40 22.10 164.00 9.00 137.80 80.00 42.20 42.90 BHW3-6 - 79.50 329.70 285.00 126.50 8.70 16.90 7.40 32.20 2.60 25.40 26.30 13.60 3.10 BHW3-7 - 188.40 149.10 182.70 124.20 13.00 25.80 13.10 42.10 5.10 31.40 20.80 11.00 93.50 BHW3-8 30.51 11.12 213.36 111.52 293.04 5.35 39.09 21.38 167.44 14.82 190.66 10.28 5.57 - BHW3-9 - 124.60 419.80 60.00 494.40 20.00 29.30 10.20 158.10 12.50 122.10 55.60 35.60 8.10 ' BHW3-10 - 68.40 240.50 86.50 1222.60 26.40 46.80 4.00 205.10 9.50 53.70 46.60 32.90 13.00 BHW3-11 122.90 7.72 336.55 353.64 203.07 6.93 15.56 9.07 95.39 12.17 66.36 16.36 4.86 - BHW3-12 189.48 5.83 444.93 671.78 20.77 4.15 9.69 7.30 19.10 14.86 26.20 0.87 10.31 - i BHW3-13 138.25 8.72 1366.50 1832.38 0.00 0.00 9.69 8.86 66.90 17.00 56.67 5.46 24.59 - -- A2-34 I BHW3-14 - 47.90 386.60 63.10 106.30 12.60 0.00 6.50 68.50 0.00 71.10 14.90 35.70 6.60 J Table A2-61: Trace element concentrations for Borehole wedge 4 (values presented as ppm) SiteName Mn Rb Ba Sr Zr Nb Y Sc Cr Cu V Zn Ni Co BHW4-1 38.15 18.39 99.72 132.69 103.16 7.39 18.51 7.93 19.95 12.21 12.55 5.45 15.92 - BHW4-2 - 125.50 319.70 100.90 520.20 20.40 35.20 15.70 144.80 9.60 74.50 79.50 37.30 34.30 BHW4-3 20.67 24.47 159.16 109.16 104.29 6.37 41.62 6.88 55.30 16.51 59.93 16.21 14.30 - BHW4-4 - 86.90 306.30 78.60 420.30 24.60 42.60 7.90 75.10 13.00 51.20 62.50 39.90 19.50 BHW4-S - 39.20 178.80 44.40 299.90 13.80 14.50 4.00 54.60 5.40 41.70 23.30 9.20 7.70 BHW4-6 86.64 9.01 256.40 193.62 139.06 6.27 31.81 10.74 60.78 10.58 88.59 39.38 5.54 - BHW4-7 54.29 9.00 381.20 183.50 183.50 10.50 14.70 21.10 42.16 24.59 46.29 5.33 25.32 - BHW4-8 37.96 30.92 299.66 218.51 199.05 20.96 29.12 9.39 40.02 16.82 24.31 10.58 9.01 - i BHW4-9 64.90 10.12 325.22 301.49 103.47 11.17 18.85 11.06 21.10 8.99 27.71 13.18 16.71 - i BHW4-10 99.74 5.32 357.96 411.35 48.10 7.44 17.46 5.53 43.15 18.22 23.74 11.22 31.19 - BHW4-11 - 93.40 608.20 93.00 211.40 12.80 10.50 3.10 73.70 0.00 51.90 12.50 11.20 0.00 Table A2-62: Trace element concentrations for Borehole wedge 5 (values presented as ppm) SiteName Mn Rb Ba Sr Zr Nb Y Sc Cr Cu V Zn Ni Co BHWS-1 - 110.00 376.80 114.00 206.60 14.00 31.90 18.20 146.80 16.80 116.20 94.10 36.90 36.60 BHW5-2 18.80 18.30 234.79 140.58 445.11 3.82 53.19 8.66 141.74 26.45 126.70 30.52 19.66 - BHWS-3 - 109.90 378.70 80.40 504.40 21.50 50.90 10.90 207.40 18.60 144.10 103.30 52.00 20.50 BHWS-4 - 88.60 279.20 43.90 1212.40 25.10 41.20 5.20 181.10 2.50 47.50 36.10 10.60 0.00 BHWS-S - 77.40 256.40 43.60 2063.50 34.10 61.10 2.90 85.70 1.00 57.80 39.80 10.60 5.40 BHWS-6 - 18.20 77.90 28.00 272.00 12.20 11.60 0.10 44.60 3.90 27.80 31.40 6.80 9.40 BHWS-7 - 41.30 146.10 83.40 574.00 15.90 22.00 2.90 50.60 2.20 31.60 18.70 8.50 7.80 BHWS-8 - 94.70 289.40 70.70 553.40 28.70 45.10 12.00 201.80 22.90 96.70 77.40 49.20 26.70 BHWS-9 - 74.50 243.10 68.30 744.10 23.60 42.00 8.40 163.90 14.30 64.40 56.70 37.40 15.40 BHW5-10 145.36 9.79 313.87 420.53 685.28 4.03 31.03 8.86 92.70 22.19 51.18 8.59 30.08 - BHW5-11 136.38 6.42 781.83 1096.17 1.52 3.75 11.94 5.42 16.81 12.82 29.71 25.45 80.19 - A2-35 BHW5-12 162.20 8.33 525.16 653.64 90.04 11.16 15.84 7.93 21.44 14.61 48.37 4.45 28.38 - BHW5-13 145.58 11.52 608.15 958.87 11.50 4.27 26.64 11.06 85.98 10.52 85.27 6.38 39.88 BHW5-14 - 49.30 447.00 83.20 77.50 15.10 0.00 10.60 89.90 0.00 105.80 24.80 25.70 4.90 BHW5-15 - 51.00 482.50 70.90 131.30 14.10 1.10 5.60 61.40 0.00 69.00 26.50 17.30 - Table A2-63: Trace element concentrations for Delmas Colliery (values presented as ppm) SiteName Mn Rb Ba Sr Zr Nb y Sc Cr Cu V Zn Ni Co DEL1 - 5.30 752.70 256.20 198.90 8.70 13.70 35.80 209.80 0.00 154.60 7.40 13.30 2.30 DEL2 194.95 18.31 598.85 905.96 96.17 7.06 23.58 7.35 65.21 23.76 38.46 8.66 41.18 - DEL4 54.24 0.00 259.74 506.57 26.15 8.18 11.05 0.30 0.00 39.28 11.53 3.16 10.05 - DEL5 188.86 0.00 412.18 696.16 20.34 5.00 19.14 2.63 21.10 15.30 24.44 3.21 4.48 - DEL6 - 77.70 441.70 108.40 366.10 16.70 13.20 5.20 169.40 3.20 59.80 12.80 69.30 14.70 DEL7 28.35 0.80 539.31 786.79 63.51 10.07 16.74 3.26 18.46 15.94 32.60 5.58 14.00 - DEL8 57.90 0.00 143.15 365.56 58.39 10.61 6.99 0.00 0.00 53.77 11.53 5.19 6.04 - DEL9 175.31 0.00 394.41 755.95 6.04 3.28 19.88 5.02 5.76 10.73 8.29 4.52 4.38 - DEL10 43.57 3.79 509.26 949.52 57.53 8.08 ·16.26 3.47 29.11 14.00 35.98 2.64 11.58 - DEL11 64.83 0.36 560.35 1505.83 15.96 3.12 18.91 3.09 12.58 15.15 18.39 1.37 14.12 - DEL12 37.59 3.31 348.36 576.08 28.32 9.64 11.61 2.14 9.00 11.90 27.49 5.46 2.60 - DEL13 30.78 41.45 195.64 112.68 650.61 10.13 17.63 37.70 1049.21 36.73 468.68 7.45 102.38 - DEL14 81.35 21.49 991.41 1553.61 79.70 9.13 16.95 6.01 21.20 20.60 37.87 2.68 10.34 - DEL15 62.76 0.38 1284.51 1013.35 31.19 6.16 20.77 4.45 42.61 13.01 26.01 3.23 6.41 - DEL16 53.08 11.19 257.33 300.67 97.09 16.83 12.00 0.90 11.78 15.67 50.34 1.28 10.24 - DEL17 52.60 0.00 546.56 727.53 48.48 8.40 11.48 3.40 29.71 15.59 36.65 6.62 6.61 - A2-36 Table A2-64: Trace element concentrations for Douglas Colliery (values presented as ppm) SiteName Mn Rb Ba Sr Zr Nb Y Sc Cr Cu V Zn Ni Mn DOU1 - 0.00 115.20 16.30 331.40 14.30 29.10 20.20 287.70 3.20 231.70 39.90 18.80 - DOU2 97.23 0.00 119.20 126.17 84.67 10.00 19.81 4.48 27.02 11.24 26.77 29.52 83.63 97.23 DOU3 32.05 0.00 150.43 84.05 123.10 10.42 38.22 5.99 37.58 6.54 39.73 9.13 13.11 32.05 DOU4 - 7.70 125.60 498.10 294.70 13.10 20.40 12.90 86.10 0.60 50.70 29.00 15.70 - DOUS - 16.70 230.50 46.00 241.00 13.40 8.60 20.50 180.90 31.70 217.60 29.30 30.10 - DOU6 100.59 0.00 171.30 146.48 61.96 9.09 12.59 4.73 41.41 7.80 40.81 20.20 25.40 100.59 DOU7 - 1.90 214.00 53.40 210.10 9.60 2.00 11.50 269.10 36.40 151.40 27.80 46.90 - DOU8 165.82 0.00 191.38 173.61 37.79 6.47 3.41 1.60 27.37 22.53 28.01 12.69 21.75 165.82 DOU9 129.34 0.00 404.67 528.99 26.47 5.67 9.08 1.46 0.00 8.83 8.94 25.84 3.05 129.34 DOU10 68.46 26.21 394.28 491.09 202.71 14.43 16.98 10.36 47.44 26.10 57.75 11.37 25;99 68.46 DOU11 - 43.40 658.40 879.00 239.30 17.70 27.20 24.30 238.00 25.60 129.90 115.60 32.80 - DOU12 - 84.10 472.30 73.40 95.20 17.30 3.30 10.20 163.80 0.00 119.20 68.10 29.90 - DOU13 272.11 0.00 388.53 354.97 51.43 8.19 14.74 5.33 15.87 10.10 8.12 3.10 25.80 272.11 DOU14 125.29 0.00 465.29 315.28 82.62 8.96 9.12 5.18 25.93 16.15 28.28 2.14 24.96 125.29 DOU15 41.52 43.28 293.65 116.80 657.48 10.76 30.59 3.85 74.77 24.64 39.73 22.84 19.73 41.52 DOU16 - 61.00 320.90 117.80 545.00 24.30 39.40 10.60 167.30 18.80 173.20 88.30 26.30 - DOU17 - 176.50 272.20 66.60 225.20 16.90 25.80 16.60 192.20 8.60 95.70 64.50 41.40 - DOU18 3.74 12.50 26.15 26.11 83.72 9.86 11.40 2.15 2.77 6.62 17.42 1.62 9.88 3.74 DOU19 - 88.10 346.40 76.60 196.50 10.20 14.70 10.90 75.30 10.70 62.80 52.60 14.50 - DOU20 - 57.60 289.70 76.80 508.50 28.40 36.80 10.60 169.70 15.50 146.70 127.90 28.70 - DOU21 - 39.40 287.30 118.10 591.80 18.70 27.90 0.00 63.50 12.00 23.80 77.50 23.20 - DOU22 134.53 0.00 929.53 1095.64 224.92 0.61 37.80 19.71 124.32 36.71 99.75 40.14 61.86 134.53 DOU23 - 9.20 296.40 93.70 368.90 24.00 33.10 23.20 243.90 27.80 194.50 47.10 50.50 - DOU24 - 53.10 403.50 255.50 250.60 21.10 21.60 16.10 186.40 30.40 128.00 144.90 40.10 - DOU25 18.37 17.48 192.16 92.01 347.92 29.03 38.03 17.92 19.95 18.58 85.57 5.09 22.55 18.37 DOU26 73.43 30.57 2348.00 3160.53 0.00 0.00 30.29 17.85 36.03 27.76 27.63 3.84 15.14 73.43 DOU27 42.47 0.00 331.21 229.55 74.04 9.69 18.65 5.28 17.61 9.71 35.22 6.08 7.82 42.47 DOU28 60.19 0.00 155.45 117.83 118.55 11.20 12.58 9.79 105.49 11.83 89.29 7.82 40.44 60.19 A2-37 DOU29 - 27.40 99.90 25.70 293.10 18.70 7.40 3.60 257.70 5.40 155.00 24.90 27.40 - DOU30 - 74.70 440.00 382.10 246.60 22.90 44.30 20.00 162.10 29.80 145.30 133.20 31.20 - DOU31 49.59 8.65 947.85 743.95 152.90 5.75 22.35 12.44 50.47 13.73 63.99 9.99 49.83 49.59 DOU32 26.40 2.59 1136.62 1110.60 121.17 9.57 22.61 12.11 47.19 14.40 38.00 1.44 16.73 26.40 DOU33 66.91 0.00 195.75 172.34 89.97 9.12 9.78 7.65 51.27 10.03 44.13 33.47 44.28 66.91 DOU34 - 56.30 387.80 65.90 285.60 20.30 8.10 3.80 171.70 1.80 110.80 62.80 32.30 - DOU35 - 49.40 368.70 210.80 815.50 26.20 33.40 15.40 358.90 20.60 114.90 72.10 77.10 - DOU36 16.16 1.24 161.20 84.96 184.02 12.55 19.80 8.96 40.17 9.80 50.51 7.35 34.84 16.16 DOU37 39.26 0.97 178.46 74.72 111.86 12.22 17.85 3.87 24.68 8.22 31.68 5.94 0.91 39.26 i DOU38 74.51 6.35 132.07 96.17 104.46 12.65 21.72 7.02 40.12 10.63 34.87 7.00 26.63 74.51 DOU39 - 5.60 227.40 223.30 209.50 9.80 16.10 12.00 199.40 3.60 154.90 22.00 38.00 - DOU40 25.32 14.70 24.48 55.76 85.40 9.42 14.83 2.97 18.01 23.18 17.53 23.62 202.47 25.32 DOU41 - 0.00 98.40 41.70 250.30 12.90 18.60 21.10 359.50 4.30 258.70 64.30 68.70 - Table A2-65: Trace element concentrations for Forzando Colliery (values presented as ppm) SiteName Mn Rb Ba Sr Zr Nb Y Sc Cr Cu V Zn Ni Co FOR1 213.69 2.38 159.99 290.07 35.97 5.91 8.07 4.38 6.06 7.22 9.59 2.45 6.58 - I FOR2 96.45 7.79 577.84 600.97 23.65 6.13 3.27 4.90 0.00 10.11 15.31 1.70 9.12 - FOR3 - 35.30 251.80 101.50 401.00 17.20 15.50 9.70 81.60 18.90 93.60 39.10 37.90 4.50 FOR4 - 29.70 286.10 70.60 279.80 16.40 7.60 11.50 74.80 15.50 99.60 20.20 16.40 1.40 FOR5 136.86 5.78 170.37 162.28 144.36 3.94 50.98 20.76 69.44 12.47 68.12 14.07 24.79 - FOR6 116.84 12.04 157.05 192.61 80.40 9.93 8.30 5.94 5.14 7.36 23.52 19.52 20.07 - FOR7 - 127.50 605.60 140.40 152.30 13.60 12.20 6.50 58.10 24.10 60.10 46.80 10.90 3.30 FORS - 34.70 325.00 76.30 318.20 8.40 22.50 16.60 141.70 9.10 68.70 31.50 22.90 14.20 FOR9 - 32.40 204.10 68.20 279.60 17.60 18.90 14.10 139.90 23.60 157.30 63.20 74.00 38.40 FOR10 - 35.70 276.40 64.00 477.60 23.60 18.30 10.40 70.90 16.60 81.80 53.30 45.70 17.00 FOR11 210.36 1.95 115.23 107.85 42.47 5.57 23.74 7.40 28.74 5.22 16.64 3.49 27.13 - FOR12 229.67 6.99 501.83 254.58 67.02 9.10 4.82 6.36 0.00 7.20 20.53 0.76 11.73 - FOR13 - 105.20 518.80 114.80 162.50 11.30 10.60 6.10 29.30 0.00 32.70 21.90 7.20 7.60 -- A2-38 Table A2-66: Trace element concentrations for Greenside Colliery (values presented as ppm) Site Name Mn Rb Ba Sr Zr Nb Y Sc Cr Cu V Zn Ni Co GRE1 - 6.00 391.80 231.30 370.70 10.00 16.00 24.60 217.40 0.00 401.70 33.80 23.50 28.10 GRE2 107.52 7.27 807.81 943.30 20.01 4.86 17.22 9.28 24.23 26.93 31.82 7.24 17.18 - GRE3 76.61 5.34 401.85 344.68 74.88 7.17 8.17 4.48 12.28 32.43 27.31 5.97 17.31 - GRE4 122.12 2.22 254.72 154.08 83.96 7.34 14.66 7.09 31.50 15.34 24.98 7.61 23.71 - GRE5 - 46.20 242.50 66.80 186.00 9.60 8.50 4.90 181.80 10.00 89.80 225.00 185.50 47.40 GRE6 - 23.20 363.70 102.50 325.80 20.40 17.50 15.20 177.50 7.00 116.70 16.90 19.50 0.60 GRE7 45.82 3.97 477.60 470.67 29.04 5.52 13.94 5.63 13.63 10.39 26.44 2.49 13.52 - GRE8 70.40 6.96 1189.80 996.83 0.00 1.88 14.86 4.38 6.71 11.62 22.01 1.18 12.97 - GRE9 160.25 1.44 429.16 446.27 26.21 4.23 15.28 5.63 20.90 10.51 18.39 2.99 29.42 - GRE10 - 87.50 519.80 77.80 248.60 16.70 8.40 5.40 177.40 0.00 92.80 15.70 20.00 0.50 GRE11 - 15.10 285.20 59.20 268.60 15.30 16.80 18.40 188.90 7.30 129.60 20.00 20.60 - GRE12 78.37 2.59 425.15 253.09 41.06 8.30 4.36 5.32 13.38 18.62 2.66 2.52 9.46 - i GRE13 146.44 2.86 349.21 226.09 79.28 8.16 18.60 8.76 32.80 8.93 25.28 1.28 12.27 - • GRE14 122.01 1.24 421.41 248.95 55.40 10.48 15.95 7.40 17.56 16.69 27.58 8.81 52.45 - GRE15 - 11.10 65.00 62.50 78.30 6.20 1.30 0.60 31.70 0.00 18.10 7.60 4.50 0.00 NGT1 - 153.00 382.40 83.00 221.40 14.10 24.20 18.20 138.30 7.20 110.10 102.90 33.80 26.50 NGT2 2.26 36.09 79.45 26.86 340.10 41.81 29.60 5.94 3.42 15.09 34.63 5.58 0.90 - NGT3 0.00 5.34 93.40 69.99 34.57 8.12 1.70 0.62 0.00 4.45 7.80 1.07 0.00 - NGT4 1.51 12.54 36.32 32.82 76.28 6.84 9.07 5.94 2.77 10.67 16.04 3.40 0.00 - NGT5 - 227.60 243.00 59.90 171.20 14.60 26.60 19.10 180.20 10.50 99.90 61.20 29.40 15.60 NGT6 - 16.20 395.30 97.70 227.10 13.60 24.30 15.00 134.50 6.70 108.60 103.60 34.40 25.50 NGT7 1.88 26.44 101.47 38.00 234.95 29.03 20.43 7.61 15.32 8.36 34.52 9.83 0.32 - NGT8 - 0.00 5.68 143.39 80.95 7.50 2.90 0.83 0.00 3.73 11.99 0.53 0.00 - NGT9 5.03 14.71 127.43 51.68 60.48 6.51 11.31 5.21 10.54 6.46 17.77 2.98 0.55 - NGT10 - 197.70 303.40 94.80 174.90 12.60 31.40 19.50 182.20 9.90 88.00 144.70 276.70 138.10 NGT11 - 158.30 423.40 158.10 234.20 15.80 26.60 13.40 124.80 6.60 105.40 95.50 33.00 34.80 NGT12 0.00 19.57 132.19 76.06 187.44 19.61 17.39 3.44 0.28 11.74 18.96 8.22 0.00 - NGT13 1.88 5.92 192.99 105.72 34.32 7.12 0.94 0.42 0.00 5.17 5.80 0.00 0.00 - NGT14 7.50 65.71 751.48 83.19 152.52 8.54 25.62 11.37 107.09 11.95 59.18 9.67 12.39 - A2-39 I NGT15 - 252.00 557.00 202.10 182.50 14.50 28.50 19.30 203.60 10.30 117.10 74.40 58.40 41.00 I Table A2-67: Trace element concentrations for Kleinkopje Colliery (values presented as ppm) SiteName Mn Rb Ba Sr Zr Nb Y Sc Cr Cu V Zn Ni Co KK1 71.34 8.01 1560.21 904.74 109.80 13.07 24.48 8.66 39.07 15.34 59.37 6.62 10.41 - KK2 12.36 2.84 129.32 472.18 0.00 3.03 3.52 9.39 0.00 33.41 0.00 12.12 9.93 - KK3 33.54 11.98 2362.01 1926.10 62.54 9.13 25.68 7.09 47.66 24.13 49.75 15.27 11.57 - KK4 90.61 59.15 947.77 1353.70 219.31 29.11 62.37 10.01 63.92 60.07 71.33 105.51 31.64 - KK5 - 25.10 235.60 48.60 390.20 23.20 20.60 20.90 334.50 59.90 352.50 92.80 38.00 4.20 KK6 - 35.50 130.10 41.10 576.40 16.10 14.10 1.00 102.40 1.90 43.30 14.10 10.10 0.00 KK7 141.80 3.50 87.67 83.33 79.34 10.11 12.89 5.74 14.37 4.22 25.20 10.75 25.38 - KK8 - 74.90 305.70 100.50 602.60 31.60 43.50 9.30 165.20 10.60 124.90 94.70 25.40 0.40 KK9 270.12 3.04 271.34 284.08 65.55 7.47 5.39 4.59 11.04 14.59 17.88 5.06 14.63 - KK10 - 0.00 8.80 11.50 62.90 4.10 0.00 0.00 50.60 0.00 21.10 2.30 5.40 0.00 KK11 - 92.50 461.60 336.60 183.80 13.00 67.70 25.90 225.00 45.10 246.40 145.10 13.00 40.20 KK12 58.28 12.79 514.37 511.68 82.11 7.35 22.68 9.18 32.60 13.33 32.41 19.06 15.85 - KK13 132.97 14.54 404.98 135.92 132.65 8.70 8.28 7.40 59.39 15.52 71.14 10.16 26.48 - KK14 - 108.90 367.30 101.30 1091.30 36.10 57.20 13.40 146.90 8.20 164.10 90.00 28.40 2.20 KK15 - 14.00 77.40 29.00 276.70 8.70 3.60 3.10 58.40 0.00 30.40 30.40 9.20 0.80 KK16 0.00 1.98 93.43 126.60 7.20 5.03 28.86 7.20 26.32 4.37 30.17 45.89 24.74 - Table A2-68: Trace element concentrations for Khutala Colliery (values presented as ppm) SiteName Mn Rb Ba Sr Zr Nb Y Sc Cr Cu V Zn Ni Co KHU1 104.61 3.07 202.47 131.33 54.75 6.00 7.94 5.74 10.09 12.97 16.02 4.53 21.83 - KHU2 153.78 4.43 373.36 191.93 74.09 8.13 12.00 6.26 17.26 9.79 22.15 4.87 5.32 - KHU3 110.89 7.35 1588.35 1076.34 0.00 0.48 20.51 6.47 15.52 13.04 16.04 7.84 3.33 - KHU4 9.59 5.55 172.39 153.63 216.86 19.67 29.11 13.25 65.36 18.16 64.46 7.61 12.01 - KHU5 99.70 8.48 321.41 239.12 274.33 12.68 15.51 6.57 50.12 15.56 68.06 9.86 10.22 - KHU6 51.17 1.15 40.38 60.57 78.64 7.34 10.37 4.38 12.03 8.03 16.02 4.66 29.11 - A2-40 KHU7 - 0.70 55.70 23.90 448.70 13.30 11.50 2.40 104.70 0.00 43.30 12.10 10.10 5.30 KHU8 104.46 2.68 46.40 85.06 45.67 5.21 10.83 3.65 0.93 17.57 12.67 3.71 19.44 - KHU9 83.76 6.73 369.74 340.53 65.28 10.12 14.53 5.94 12.88 10.94 27.79 2.89 9.13 - KHU10 138.43 4.24 365.51 332.17 96.77 8.19 23.11 10.12 18.36 15.16 33.22 2.60 3.36 - KHU11 90.83 5.58 285.68 430.99 31.16 9.18 9.89 5.01 8.35 27.30 33.19 3.28 15.61 - KHU12 138.02 28.30 489.07 477.59 96.29 11.23 17.83 11.16 25.53 19.00 37.27 3.77 5.42 - KHU13 120.17 6.67 639.62 852.84 60.55 8.40 19.20 13.45 61.68 19.11 39.05 2.29 9.00 - KHU14 67.93 22.43 849.83 870.34 56.52 6.69 24.04 11.26 30.21 14.71 39.81 4.32 4.22 - KHU15 127.66 10.58 803.54 927.44 13.59 5.16 16.96 7.72 20.50 14.09 31.22 2.55 4.46 - KHU16 32.38 6.64 697.24 513.71 17.56 5.41 21.75 6.57 47.98 9.81 38.35 2.81 23.19 - J Table A2-69: Trace element concentrations for Koornfontein Colliery (values presented as ppm) SiteName Mn Rb Ba Sr Zr Nb Y Sc Cr Cu V Zn Ni Co KOR1 124.59 0.77 341.88 393.65 43.68 7.65 11.66 1.03 7.05 7.17 15.53 6.66 2.40 - KOR2 106.15 0.46 20.66 274.32 74.37 9.03 16.04 4.36 15.37 8.92 13.15 10.13 3.52 - KOR3 91.62 0.00 14.29 165.45 112.28 12.40 20.21 5.37 28.22 10.64 21.71 15.77 1.78 - KOR4 108.13 1.41 339.22 665.69 36.98 6.79 7.74 4.32 0.00 11.38 8.05 4.67 3.77 - KOR5 111.60 0.00 238.87 646.52 53.02 6.98 18.31 2.65 6.16 8.03 13.18 5.69 1.99 - KOR6 88.10 0.00 0.00 301.46 63.07 7.32 15.10 1.37 14.82 6.17 11.84 6.22 1.18 - KOR7 102.07 6.69 415.46 334.32 87.28 10.69 7.81 5.07 4.66 9.68 21.23 5.07 1.92 - KOR8 136.74 0.00 301.85 573.22 71.59 10.21 11.88 3.84 12.18 11.84 20.93 6.02 3.86 - KOR9 209.25 0.00 100.88 177.98 93.03 9.16 8.40 1.90 23.64 17.79 14.88 6.20 23.03 - KOR10 139.74 5.65 298.25 374.00 117.34 13.44 17.91 5.53 20.65 10.53 32.30 5.50 2.41 - KORSST - 14.70 292.10 498.40 65.10 10.60 19.10 38.50 764.30 96.70 329.20 94.30 194.90 83.00 KOR11 140.70 0.00 100.49 344.53 58.57 7.02 13.83 1.67 7.85 10.17 11.96 4.88 3.48 - KOR12 99.69 3.12 90.73 168.04 125.53 10.74 16.71 5.73 54.95 13.86 34.17 11.44 13.02 - KOR13 111.37 5.09 747.17 728.20 26.41 6.08 6.19 2.98 10.74 8.18 17.20 7.77 0.00 - KOR14 113.89 0.00 94.51 308.12 86.85 9.99 11.16 1.82 7.30 10.23 17.12 6.28 11.11 - KOR15 141.74 0.00 54.59 804.30 21.33 3.07 15.82 4.59 0.00 13.97 2.56 3.51 0.00 - KOR16 149.67 0.00 329.63 395.61 42.43 6.29 14.55 2.80 6.11 12.37 17.15 4.90 2.34 - A2-41 KOR17 82.76 0.00 113.17 125.88 60.32 9.10 11.76 2.35 17.15 6.65 16.15 5.28 1.42 KOR18 62.99 0.00 153.07 80.79 78.94 13.65 15.90 4.33 9.49 11.08 27.04 3.33 6.82 Table A2-70: Trace element concentrations for Kromdraai Colliery (values presented as ppm) Site Name Mn Rb Ba Sr Zr Nb Y Sc Cr Cu V Zn Ni Co KR01 6.57 8.85 893.67 524.21 158.53 12.21 24.78 10.04 45.29 15.49 44.67 29.32 13.24 - KR02 8.83 8.13 652.82 386.60 130.54 11.35 22.20 8.56 32.35 16.71 35.62 17.19 11.24 - KR03 3.93 8.50 983.96 662.79 143.76 14.08 27.15 9.16 43.25 15.52 50.99 10.90 11.51 - KR04 - 0.00 24.60 28.10 603.20 21.90 9.40 3.30 88.10 0.00 33.50 252.60 91.30 72.50 KROS - 0.00 25.20 20.80 662.00 26.10 12.50 0.00 104.60 2.70 37.40 91.40 215.90 164.40 KR06 2.82 0.00 23.47 65.70 91.49 12.06 13.83 3.83 23.19 4.45 13.49 17.03 10.95 - KR07 1.86 0.00 78.94 175.27 58.92 8.29 14.08 1.07 24.23 5.15 34.84 28.15 8.30 - KR08 1.59 0.00 12.46 73.27 69.60 9.11 14.47 1.57 19.00 5.48 28.49 48.38 15.89 - KR09 3.69 0.00 246.89 67.08 96.20 10.19 6.48 0.00 11.24 6.91 22.07 8.27 37.11 - KR010 0.79 0.00 472.37 345.47 85.75 10.67 13.59 3.39 30.66 16.30 31.14 17.51 15.66 - KR011 2.80 0.00 1457.91 787.10 62.61 7.16 11.01 3.41 15.82 15.37 21.82 57.07 55.02 - Table A2-71: Trace element concentrations for Lakeside Colliery (values presented as ppm) SiteName Mn Rb Ba Sr Zr Nb Y Sc Cr Cu V Zn Ni Co LK1 96.3 3.0 107.8 97.4 24.10 4.13 2.16 0.52 0.00 22.32 1.40 4.23 54.03 - LK2 14.92 13.3 147.3 163.9 100.37 7.56 27.61 11.10 23.49 8.81 17.47 6.32 10.61 - LK3 41.96 0.0 79.6 91.8 40.21 7.82 5.79 0.00 7.30 6.95 7.70 5.59 8.72 - LK4 80.53 0.0 145.8 138.0 83.45 11.30 8.65 4.91 1.48 23.36 7.40 4.79 4.90 - LK5 106.51 4.2 178.8 127.5 72.47 8.16 12.54 2.26 9.10 9.65 15.96 8.98 3.82 - LK6 24.24 0.0 132.3 90.1 65.25 10.13 13.34 3.75 15.07 6.48 19.07 4.16 7.33 - LK7 78.06 0.0 161.4 192.8 55.75 9.30 9.13 1.66 0.00 15.56 15.15 8.68 20.99 - A2-42 Table A2-72: Trace element concentrations for Leeufontein Colliery (values presented as ppm) SiteName Mn Rb Ba Sr Zr Nb Y Sc Cr Cu V Zn Ni Co LU1 29.88 0.00 153.62 119.38 69.64 9.10 16.34 5.82 28.42 7.92 20.09 14.30 12.63 - LU2 35.05 0.00 143.91 67.69 41.18 8.80 7.73 0.00 0.83 3.79 10.86 5.28 3.46 - LU3 111.61 0.00 192.23 280.90 33.16 7.89 11.20 2.29 0.00 9.00 8.40 12.62 13.49 - LU4 61.28 0.00 216.71 125.14 32.56 8.85 5.56 0.00 0.00 5.31 7.26 1.85 10.79 - LUS - 3.10 109.60 194.30 75.40 6.70 1.70 4.70 40.30 0.00 13.80 11.30 9.10 0.00 LU6 187.22 0.00 216.18 143.99 45.59 7.45 9.48 1.80 5.06 7.24 9.34 6.15 17.10 - LU7 17.12 2.52 157.55 65.52 216.75 20.77 23.46 0.10 20.10 19.25 40.16 19.08 7.08 - LU8 25.39 44.41 189.04 71.30 259.40 31.82 46.51 10.31 58.79 22.38 79.22 7.62 16.23 - LU9 71.29 0.00 216.82 120.99 43.19 8.66 6.99 0.00 3.22 5.45 9.91 4.87 20.27 - LU10 50.55 0.00 215.36 111.84 58.41 9.34 9.83 2.07 9.10 6.56 17.88 2.93 27.43 - LU11 59.14 0.00 240.27 139.79 90.63 10.40 14.83 3.85 13.73 8.33 22.17 8.71 17.99 - LU13 82.90 2.25 123.85 95.41 17.67 6.92 6.07 2.92 8.40 5.66 14.42 3.98 7.23 - LU14 143.40 0.00 212.10 227.27 59.80 10.62 7.06 2.13 0.00 15.02 6.99 3.49 34.40 - LU15 60.72 0.00 234.11 170.29 58.32 8.67 8.72 2.87 6.51 5.71 18.31 9.73 9.35 - LU16 27.82 6.47 214.10 109.51 84.96 10.37 15.65 3.97 14.27 7.12 17.58 23.80 31.66 - LU17 108.74 0.00 576.63 469.51 50.10 9.51 12.06 2.38 8.25 11.93 23.33 9.71 12.99 - LU18 35.95 0.00 324.93 94.57 75.84 9.74 12.60 4.03 28.37 7.66 28.22 12.02 10.00 - LU19 92.01 0.00 272.79 218.09 36.91 8.67 6.33 0.00 0.38 14.08 7.24 4.40 33.45 - i LU20 50.67 0.00 225.66 211.66 30.09 8.21 7.36 1.55 2.32 10.39 12.50 1.65 71.44 - i LU21 14.56 3.30 228.48 85.40 358.17 36.81 37.19 7.80 83.88 23.65 69.95 5.54 9.50 - ! LU22 31.03 0.00 282.29 116.74 50.55 7.96 14.52 1.57 12.03 4.84 15.02 5.09 6.11 - LU23 72.59 0.00 204.39 139.00 46.02 8.77 7.18 0.00 2.12 6.94 8.26 9.67 15.01 - LU24 58.54 0.00 288.91 266.08 41.16 8.12 13.14 2.44 11.67 7.04 12.75 9.56 33.10 - LU25 147.22 0.00 439.87 447.31 50.92 6.77 11.88 2.37 7.05 14.37 12.21 4.30 7.34 - LU26 71.21 0.00 722.44 487.65 21.34 6.17 9.97 0.27 4.22 7.92 11.21 2.83 8.36 - LU27 12.75 9.76 511.92 370.02 121.45 11.70 24.60 5.03 32.80 10.00 43.48 4.24 10.47 - LU28 103.23 0.23 744.61 555.25 80.77 8.93 13.80 3.57 10.44 11.93 21.82 4.34 15.37 - LU29 51.41 5.00 512.53 283.38 90.23 9.43 14.14 6.03 34.34 10.29 34.06 12.64 15.68 - - A2-43 LU30 70.24 0.00 398.42 133.56 65.56 7.76 10.41 1.36 4.51 10.75 11.40 11.62 12.57 - LUP1 59.04 5.17 62.59 49.72 131.31 14.34 13.39 7.03 47.19 15.57 54.02 12.35 42.09 - LUP2 68.68 0.00 90.00 162.38 42.66 8.29 4.50 0.00 4.42 9.66 14.56 3.58 8.69 - LUP3 123.18 0.00 231.89 148.97 66.45 12.65 8.34 4.07 13.93 8.26 18.12 3.94 44.11 - LUP4 9.86 21.97 1440.99 817.38 53.93 7.23 29.54 6.74 20.40 17.18 38.54 8.67 9.44 - Table A2-73: Trace element concentrations for Middelburg Colliery (values presented as ppm) SiteName Mn Rb Ba Sr Zr Nb Y Sc Cr Cu V Zn Ni Co M1 200.01 7.29 106.17 26.37 177.91 16.94 32.46 9.69 44.20 20.24 52.91 15.20 63.60 - M2 136.93 0.00 185.33 45.88 84.08 8.85 26.62 7.95 42.36 10.46 53.26 10.47 59.22 - M3 - 11.40 60.70 15.70 230.40 11.10 9.50 1.00 71.70 5.30 32.90 37.90 20.60 5.30 M4 - 12.20 102.50 22.70 151.50 10.60 5.40 9.70 96.50 11.90 68.00 35.10 17.90 3.30 M5 100.12 4.97 288.41 130.48 118.57 11.69 24.28 6.91 33.20 14.41 40.41 8.10 28.21 - M6 59.69 12.45 312.52 100.94 218.67 27.38 33.43 12.08 68.35 14.65 71.39 5.36 23.07 - M7 131.22 0.00 443.67 217.31 89.18 10.68 14.46 3.34 32.45 10.85 30.28 3.90 16.87 - M8 75.77 0.00 152.43 101.43 129.22 9.33 22.54 7.98 54.81 20.27 43.62 11.12 14.88 - M9 27.28 8.92 1108.43 1041.17 146.84 9.20 34.09 14.21 73.23 17.09 61.34 16.00 20.44 - M10 - 12.50 406.50 356.70 370.30 25.70 26.30 33.00 225.40 6.20 167.90 44.50 41.30 8.20 M11 64.98 0.00 119.15 87.23 111.25 11.26 21.26 6.96 57.49 12.20 42.62 27.13 28.64 - M12 79.89 0.00 157.19 129.56 95.98 10.78 16.25 5.10 22.09 12.92 24.58 13.59 23.91 - M13 - 8.80 160.60 340.10 121.80 9.20 6.40 6.10 59.50 5.30 20.10 12.30 20.80 3.50 M14 89.11 0.00 186.64 172.35 85.77 9.99 18.56 6.31 20.15 11.28 21.47 8.39 6.68 - M15 51.40 0.00 412.60 117.29 67.18 10.34 8.99 3.51 13.38 7.83 23.70 4.12 4.55 - M16 105.11 0.00 617.67 405.17 84.46 8.00 14.35 4.12 13.93 14.27 21.77 3.95 7.63 - M17 55.89 4.37 540.59 768.34 73.09 6.28 18.99 6.31 7.15 11.20 15.37 4.58 22.96 - M18 197.90 0.00 225.66 219.19 74.29 8.37 13.98 4.85 27.67 7.84 25.06 6.63 24.12 - M19 401.72 9.05 129.82 67.22 159.88 10.82 26.99 11.00 25.08 19.94 36.38 15.52 25.57 - M20 8.09 39.85 98.13 66.73 225.49 9.38 18.59 5.04 51.72 21.28 54.29 18.31 15.57 - M21 - 102.70 250.50 51.60 687.60 25.80 39.30 4.20 92.40 5.50 45.00 22.20 18.70 0.00 M22 - 112.30 364.70 78.90 320.70 15.50 22.90 15.00 168.90 5.30 113.10 81.90 33.20 14.10 A2-44 ~ Table A2-74: Trace element concentrations for Optimum Colliery (values presented as ppm) SiteName Mn Rb Ba Sr Zr Nb Y Sc Cr Cu V Zn Ni Co OPT1 6.19 14.04 73.35 58.96 81.89 7.81 15.64 9.18 54.11 38.96 47.13 15.67 69.13 - OPT2 62.26 2.10 90.03 92.04 29.44 7.95 3.35 1.46 14.12 7.05 15.31 1.21 12.23 - OPT3 - 84.40 400.40 63.00 295.90 14.80 15.90 4.50 52.40 0.00 45.00 43.60 10.40 0.00 OPT4 92.12 0.00 106.10 129.97 98.82 8.10 9.82 1.33 39.87 7.42 21.17 4.66 10.18 - OPT5 27.68 0.00 144.23 112.98 42.19 9.94 7.92 0.00 21.10 6.54 19.63 2.90 14.48 - OPT6 18.66 3.12 236.52 133.65 94.82 9.23 42.07 16.16 . 22.69 7.08 29.60 27.57 19.19 - OPT7 43.41 0.00 389.67 273.74 25.60 6.94 22.19 10.76 6.86 7.84 20.34 50.18 26.46 - OPTS - 32.90 143.80 153.20 174.20 13.20 21.60 4.20 50.50 10.40 26.40 49.90 164.30 27.20 OPT9 9.93 0.00 154.67 61.50 55.27 5.51 44.07 11.51 23.34 9.87 23.90 64.32 15.19 - OPT10 38.00 0.00 445.05 272.23 61.39 8.90 17.14 5.97 18.21 6.81 19.28 8.27 6.93 - OPT11 - 14.20 159.70 34.30 129.50 8.50 5.50 1.70 56.60 4.00 29.90 16.20 14.50 5.10 OPT12 1.17 4.21 276.57 71.94 101.00 7.09 58.52 20.23 62.07 17.16 73.92 28.49 13.70 - OPT13 38.73 0.00 334.39 96.97 70.69 9.61 17.67 4.89 18.66 8.83 25.95 11.24 20.48 - J Table A2-75: Trace element concentrations for Rietspruit Colliery (values presented as ppm) SiteName Mn Rb Ba Sr Zr Nb y Sc Cr Cu V Zn Ni Co R2RO - 68.90 436.60 252.80 308.50 19.80 31.50 21.40 190.20 23.00 144.10 121.20 36.30 17.70 R2M 47.34 16.22 1003.04 2662.77 15.36 0.00 74.22 7.90 30.85 18.71 31.84 13.94 29.33 - R2M2 24.37 0.46 374.10 681.40 26.71 6.50 19.36 5.16 1.68 14.55 10.72 3.84 8.17 - R2LW 75.70 7.05 3291.85 2070.25 0.00 0.00 22.64 3.72 8.20 13.26 16.91 2.68 6.03 - R4UROOF - 103.50 379.50 75.10 235.40 14.80 29.40 20.70 197.30 9.90 135.60 94.20 41.40 19.20 R4U 42.23 92.85 154.51 101.66 156.39 14.69 25.48 4.45 20.05 20.27 33.03 14.78 14.73 - R4PT - 53.40 292.00 78.50 252.30 19.00 32.20 19.50 148.80 12.40 120.00 69.00 25.80 8.30 R4L 59.21 8.75 337.71 282.43 89.31 10.21 25.88 8.41 30.81 10.22 49.86 4.26 11.61 - R4FUG - 0.00 48.10 18.30 633.50 21.70 15.50 7.20 102.80 12.90 113.00 105.10 11.90 5.30 R4FLG - 5.40 135.00 37.20 408.70 22.50 17.30 12.20 253.80 42.50 269.20 168.60 13.30 27.20 R4F1 - 0.00 271.00 32.20 304.50 15.50 5.90 19.80 84.10 149.00 496.70 136.20 17.40 10.60 A2-45 R4F2 52.73 5.68 25.73 1.48 0.05 0.03 0.24 0.15 1.75 0.87 0.03 0.94 10.07 99.75 R4F3 73.17 1.98 10.37 2.39 0.79 0.06 0.16 0.14 1.30 0.32 0.02 0.59 9.44 100.73 Table A2-76: Trace element concentrations for South Witbank Colliery (values presented as ppm) SiteName Mn Rb Ba Sr Zr Nb y Sc Cr Cu V Zn Ni Co SW1 103.98 0.91 501.40 792.59 51.20 7.05 12.40 5.63 12.73 16.08 28.30 0.34 16.92 - SW2 76.86 6.81 356.77 452.37 136.41 12.91 17.97 4.57 22.04 13.73 40.68 0.86 12.27 - SW3 59.97 8.64 425.12 368.18 101.03 12.74 18.33 6.58 24.33 18.64 41.59 1.32 10.15 - SW4 88.85 4.15 952.47 1325.14 31.55 3.57 14.63 6.39 20.80 13.88 29.71 0.55 9.36 - SW5 129.53 11.60 484.34 618.11 89.72 8.43 15.16 5.43 8.55 19.28 28.88 2.10 10.60 - SW6 60.11 17.86 354.04 399.35 116.28 15.04 17.67 7.30 22.69 18.07 44.67 1.86 10.60 - SW7 87.54 9.71 1267.68 1227.75 0.00 1.97 7.82 4.80 13.63 11.88 24.74 0.73 3.22 - SW8 89.41 9.27 1194.83 1272.62 0.00 1.81 9.10 5.01 12.38 13.43 22.07 1.37 3.29 - SW9 66.51 12.47 826.70 814.07 31.01 4.95 11.48 6.57 15.92 10.03 29.87 2.48 3.12 - SW10 131.55 5.37 538.91 810.27 28.19 6.15 10.39 5.01 5.26 16.43 15.34 1.37 19.25 - -----_._-- -- Table A2-77: Trace element concentrations for Tavistock Colliery (values presented as ppm) SiteName Mn Rb Ba Sr Zr Nb Y Sc Cr Cu V Zn Ni Co TAV1A 137.24 5.93 1290.49 1774.47 0.00 0.00 23.06 7.20 9.05 19.73 15.80 2.67 8.77 - TAV1B 96.60 20.10 2902.38 3646.04 0.00 0.00 22.89 2.82 7.35 19.84 14.77 1.99 16.10 - TAV1C 101.84 0.40 1180.33 1957.58 0.00 0.00 26.16 1.28 4.22 21.45 13.56 4.50 23.62 - TAV2A 82.24 10.25 1344.32 2237.95 0.00 0.00 28.78 4.15 9.89 16.66 19.58 42.31 19.91 - TAV2B 104.36 7.00 1409.73 1824.59 0.00 0.00 13.25 3.20 3.27 16.96 15.72 32.23 16.63 - TAV2C 95.18 5.27 520.46 443.18 104.05 11.36 17.68 6.28 32.15 13.10 35.71 1.68 15.83 - TAV3A 82.90 0.00 235.71 258.58 47.41 7.30 9.59 3.34 22.59 11.64 19.45 5.73 19.47 - TAV3B 73.10 0.00 237.29 263.01 58.98 8.36 10.69 3.71 27.29 8.31 23.52 8.02 17.24 - TAV3C 176.06 0.00 237.68 382.26 36.14 6.25 8.09 2.41 9.25 20.48 11.83 7.86 38.49 - TAV4A - 57.00 311.80 85.30 221.80 19.70 26.60 14.70 142.30 20.70 103.80 33.30 24.70 13.80 TAV4B - 59.00 326.00 85.00 214.00 20.00 24.50 14.10 135.20 22.60 104.30 34.60 24.90 10.00 TAV4C - 57.40 315.00 83.90 218.10 19.50 25.70 14.70 141.90 22.30 99.10 35.60 24.10 11.10 A2-46 TAV5A 36.92 40.81 1205.43 1223.07 50.67 7.01 30.32 12.11 32.85 15.65 93.02 2.77 12.25 - TAV5B 39.82 63.71 927.72 1126.92 55.05 6.29 28.92 9.19 29.31 14.20 77.71 3.63 10.49 - TAV5C 34.06 60.80 952.36 954.58 74.40 7.01 20.10 12.41 43.55 14.72 84.51 4.22 8.62 - TAV6A 52.60 0.00 801.33 945.41 41.09 6.09 17.74 5.66 15.57 13.95 23.98 1.82 17.85 - TAV6B 56.38 4.20 746.49 1123.31 38.04 4.43 14.76 5.53 19.70 12.85 25.01 1.52 11.45 - , TAV6C 60.58 2.75 677.33 945.24 40.26 5.18 17.75 6.39 20.30 12.79 25.90 1.64 10.66 - TAV7A 104.29 0.00 344.33 601.71 54.47 7.87 14.34 4.62 20.50 16.31 25.21 1.05 15.45 - TAV7C 20.14 46.84 160.85 120.67 180.80 22.01 23.97 6.57 26.52 21.08 55.15 2.42 9.03 - - Table A2-78: Trace element oxide concentrations for Union Colliery (values presented as ppm) SiteName Mn Rb Ba Sr Zr Nb y Sc Cr Cu V Zn Ni Co UN1 44.30 2.48 238.19 209.91 82.55 9.88 14.33 6.27 27.22 10.52 33.92 13.98 26.38 - UN2 40.57 0.00 254.70 202.87 84.57 11.06 14.25 7.30 29.36 8.95 37.19 4.84 33.03 - UN3 3.9.74 1.81 239.42 160.04 82.85 10.37 12.99 6.00 50.92 8.89 37.89 7.45 21.31 - UN4 24.95 1.48 226.90 158.80 77.46 9.62 13.12 3.18 64.12 7.64 35.19 9.75 22.96 - UN5B 10.49 7.60 230.81 107.68 73.92 9.99 10.92 4.52 31.90 7.23 36.25 1.92 12.73 - UN6B 9.08 0.00 212.29 113.05 76.56 10.16 16.84 5.08 45.05 8.98 42.92 2.60 13.98 - A2-47 Table A2-79: Mineral composition of samples for Arnot Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM (values presented as wt%) Site Name -Cl) - -Cl) tiCl)t! c Cl) Cl)ns 'u 'E Cl)0 - .-. E .-Cl) - Cl) -Cl) E Cl);: ëii ::::J I/)ns .-Cl.)I/) Cl) ns 'n0 ·C ns::::J s (ij '0 c. Cl) >. c. 'C . ...cc c. ns E (ij a « I/) en e e>. - - :li::: 0 C 0- LI.. «c (ij Cl) 0:I: :I: -I- ARA2 26.40 52.90 0.10 0.20 0.40 - 9.00 5.40 2.70 - - 2.80 - - 99.90 ARA3 69.90 10.20 0.10 0.40 - - 11.70 - 4.00 - - 3.40 0.10 - 99.80 ARA4 13.70 74.30 - 0.40 0.30 0.10 5.00 3.10 1.70 - - 1.20 - - 99.80 ARA5 16.60 59.60 5.70 2.60 5.60 - 1.10 - 7.40 - - 1.30 - - 99.90 ARA6 18.20 72.20 - 0.20 - - 3.40 2.30 1.60 - - 1.80 - - 99.70 ARA7 27.10 55.60 - 0.40 0.10 0.10 8.60 5.40 1.40 - - 1.30 - - 100.00 ARA8 22.80 62.80 - 0.20 0.10 0.10 6.90 4.30 1.40 - - 1.30 - - 99.90 ARA9 21.50 48.50 17.80 4.50 2.00 0.30 2.90 - 0.90 - - 1.50 - - 99.90 ARA10 11.50 64.90 11.40 4.30 1.50 1.80 3.00 - - - - 1.40 - - 99.80 ARA11 71.00 9.20 0.30 0.30 1.70 - 9.10 5.90 1.00 - - 1.30 - - 99.80 ARA12 73.40 9.60 - - 0.10 - 7.20 - 7.60 - - 1.80 - - 99.70 ARA13 4.20 71.70 - 0.40 8.20 0.40 4.30 - 10.20 - - 1.00 - - 100.40 ARA14 23.70 62.60 - 0.40 0.40 0.20 9.90 - 1.20 - - 1.40 - - 99.80 i ARA15 25.70 58.00 0.90 0.90 1.50 - 9.50 - 1.50 0.40 - 1.60 - - 100.00 ARA16 50.50 9.80 0.20 0.80 0.30 0.10 21.00 13.10 3.60 - - 0.70 - - 100.10 ARB1 50.10 12.00 - - 4.80 - 5.40 3.80 20.30 - - 2.10 - 1.40 99.90 ARB2 22.00 64.50 0.90 0.60 1.90 - 5.90 - 0.80 0.30 - 3.00 - - 99.90 ARB3 68.00 6.60 5.70 3.40 - - 8.00 4.80 2.10 - - 1.30 - - 99.90 ARB4 55.10 31.70 0.40 - - 0.40 6.30 4.00 1.30 - - 1.00 - - 100.20 ARBS 10.40 57.70 2.70 1.80 4.40 0.30 19.40 - 1.10 - - 2.00 - - 99.80 ARB6 61.50 14.00 6.80 2.90 0.60 - 5.70 3.50 4.10 - - 0.70 - - 99.80 ARB7 5.10 78.60 6.60 1.80 1.70 0.60 1.20 - - 0.70 2.90 0.80 - - 100.00 A2-48 ARBS 83.40 8.00 - - 0.50 0.20 2.80 2.20 2.10 - - 0.80 - - 100.00 I ARB9 24.30 62.50 - 0.40 0.20 0.20 9.60 - 1.30 - - 1.40 - - 99.90 ARB10 9.10 82.20 - 0.30 2.70 0.20 2.50 - 2.50 - - 0.70 - - 100.20 I ARB11 18.70 65.70 0.20 0.80 0.10 0.10 10.70 - 2.30 - - 1.20 - - 99.80 ARB13 34.90 16.80 4.30 3.50 0.10 0.20 19.60 11.50 7.90 0.10 - 1.00 - 0.10 100.00 ARC1 27.40 57.70 0.10 0.30 0.30 0.10 5.60 3.40 2.40 - - 2.50 - - 99.80 ARC2 7.50 53.70 9.30 2.90 8.20 - 3.00 - 13.60 - - 1.80 - - 100.00 I ARC3 72.10 11.10 0.90 0.40 - - 7.40 4.50 2.10 0.10 - 1.30 - - 99.90 ARC4 31.70 50.50 - 0.30 0.20 0.10 8.70 5.50 1.70 - - 1.30 - - 100.00 ARC5 - 35.50 12.00 3.20 16.20 - 6.60 - 24.80 - - 1.40 - - 99.70 ARC6 19.70 66.00 7.20 0.80 1.70 - 1.40 - 1.00 - - 2.10 - - 99.90 ARC7 77.60 11.20 - - 0.70 - 3.70 - 4.50 - - 2.20 - - 99.90 AR01 29.70 51.90 0.30 0.20 0.60 0.10 12.50 - 2.10 - - 2.40 - - 99.80 ARD2 10.30 59.50 4.50 1.60 5.10 0.40 6.80 - 9.40 - - 2.20 - - 99.80 AR03 68.90 3.80 8.40 3.40 0.20 - 6.40 3.80 4.20 0.10 - 0.70 - - 99.90 AR04 33.30 49.50 - 0.10 0.10 0.20 8.80 5.40 1.50 - - 1.20 - - 100.10 ARD5 34.00 57.80 2.90 0.60 1.00 - 1.30 - 0.30 - - 2.20 - - 100.10 ARD6 3.30 57.50 9.70 2.30 3.20 - 3.80 - 18.40 - - 1.40 - - 99.60 AR07 77.50 14.60 - - - 0.30 1.10 - 3.00 - - 3.40 - - 99.90 Table A2-80: Mineral composition of samples for Arnot-North Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM (values presented as wt%) SiteName -Q) Q) cjQ) Q)Q) E Q)Q) Cf)t! e -Q) -E - .-. E .-t: "-iii :::I -cu .Q) -Q.)cu '0 ëj 0 .t: ti) Q) .a Cf) Q) cuc. cu ;t: E jij:::I cu jij '0 ccu. C.a >. Cf) '0 :e >. c: jij Q)~ o C Q. ct ~ u, fn o 0(!) ct ::t: ::t: I-- 3936 28.70 43.10 - 0.20 - 0.50 14.50 - 11.30 0.10 - 1.10 0.50 0.10 100.10 3937 28.30 44.50 - 0.40 - 0.30 9.50 6.80 9.00 - - 1.20 - 100.00 3938 11.40 68.60 1.80 0.60 1.60 0.60 6.00 - 6.30 - - 1.80 1.20 - 99.90 A2-49 3939 37.50 41.90 0.50 0.20 0.50 0.50 4.80 5.00 7.40 0.10 - 1.60 - - 100.00 3940 47.00 25.00 0.20 0.60 1.10 0.20 11.80 8.80 3.80 0.20 - 1.20 - - 99.90 3941 29.00 6.80 3.50 2.60 0.20 1.20 14.00 20.90 16.20 - - 1.40 - 4.30 100.10 3942 28.10 34.60 - 0.90 - 0.30 12.60 8.70 13.70 0.10 - 1.00 - 0.20 100.20 3943 16.90 47.60 - 1.00 0.60 1.00 6.90 5.60 19.10 - - 1.00 - 0.30 100.00 3944 20.40 30.00 0.30 1.60 0.80 0.40 10.50 7.60 27.20 - - 0.90 - 0.30 100.00 3945 27.40 52.20 - 0.20 2.80 0.50 6.30 - 7.90 - - 1.30 1.40 - 100.00 3946 50.80 22.90 - - 0.80 0.10 7.70 6.20 7.00 - - 4.40 - - 99.90 ! 3947 58.40 11.30 0.50 - 0.20 0.10 14.10 9.30 3.80 - - 2.10 - - 99.80 i 3948 22.80 31.30 - 0.70 - 0.40 21.60 - 20.50 - - 1.10 0.40 1.00 99.80 3949 34.30 45.10 - 0.10 - 0.50 9.30 - 8.60 - - 1.60 0.40 - 99.90 3950 39.90 38.20 1.00 0.10 0.10 0.30 4.20 3.90 9.60 - - 2.60 - - 99.90 3951 36.50 40.80 1.00 - 2.30 0.30 6.20 - 9.90 0.30 - 1.60 1.00 - 99.90 3952 56.10 23.40 0.20 - 0.20 0.10 5.20 4.20 5.90 - - 4.60 - - 99.90 3953 44.60 6.50 4.00 2.00 0.50 0.30 22.40 - 17.20 - - 0.80 1.30 0.30 99.90 3954 31.60 46.70 0.50 0.50 - 0.40 6.50 5.50 6.80 0.10 - 1.30 - - 99.90 3955 32.40 47.80 1.20 0.40 1.60 0.30 7.70 - 6.40 - - 1.30 0.90 - 100.00 3956 79.30 7.80 - - 0.40 - 4.50 4.30 1.30 - - 2.30 - - 99.90 3957 46.40 31.20 0.30 - 1.00 0.20 8.00 6.20 3.80 - - 2.90 - - 100.00 3958 60.90 11.50 0.30 - 0.60 - 9.00 6.70 6.70 - - 4.20 - - 99.90 3959 51.60 31.10 0.30 - 0.40 - 4.90 4.40 4.40 - - 2.80 - - 99.90 Table A2-81: Mineral composition of samples for Bank Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM (values presented as wt%) SiteName Cl) Cl) u Cl) Cl) ;t:: t! c: Cl) '-e Cl) ; cu (5 ë-j 0 .-t: - Cl)Cl) -Cl) E Cl)I/): E .t: ë-ii :::J ..I/) cu Cl) -_g cucu fn Cl) ;t:: ëQ:::J cu ëQ (5 c. ......, C. _g C. -cu Ea ~ a>. I/) "CCJ C . ct IL (i) (3 o>. c: ëQ Cl) 0ct :I: :I: I-- BAN1 - 35.90 23.10 4.00 6.20 8.00 6.90 - 4.00 10.90 - 0.90 - - 99.90 I BAN2 - 59.00 11.50 2.90 4.30 5.00 8.20 - 2.40 5.60 - 1.10 - - 100.00 I BAN3 - 48.10 4.20 1.50 4.20 8.40 21.10 - 2.60 8.00 - 1.90 - - 100.00 A2-50 BAN4 0.50 10.80 31.50 8.30 7.00 9.20 2.10 - 4.10 25.10 - 1.30 - - 99.90 BAN5 - 71.40 4.80 2.20 1.00 - 6.90 - - 8.10 2.30 2.80 - - 99.50 BAN6 5.90 66.90 11.50 2.30 4.60 1.20 5.10 - 1.20 - - 1.50 - - 100.20 BAN7 7.80 74.00 6.30 2.40 1.50 - 4.10 - - - - 3.70 - - 99.80 BAN8 0.60 41.90 17.70 5.30 6.10 - 13.90 - 4.80 8.40 - 1.20 - - 99.90 BAN9 - - 15.70 5.00 9.70 6.10 10.70 - 11.90 39.30 - 1.60 - - 100.00 BAN10 21.70 57.90 - 1.10 0.10 0.90 13.80 - 3.10 - - 1.20 - - 99.80 BAN11 24.30 49.80 0.30 1.20 0.10 - 13.20 7.50 2.40 - - 1.00 - - 99.80 BAN12 32.30 31.10 - 0.60 7.10 - 21.90 - 6.10 - - 1.00 - - 100.10 BAN13 24.10 34.00 - - 10.80 - 12.00 - 18.10 - - 1.00 - - 100.00 BAN14 20.70 - 1.70 3.60 1.20 4.20 19.20 - 48.30 - - 0.30 - - 99.20 BAN15 26.20 47.30 0.30 1.50 0.10 - 13.30 7.60 2.60 - - 1.00 - - 99.90 BAN16 25.70 27.70 - - 12.60 - 10.30 - 22.90 - - 0.50 - - 99.70 BAN17 31.10 34.70 - 0.90 6.00 - 15.40 - 11.10 - - 0.90 - - 100.10 BAN18 34.10 - 0.50 4.10 1.00 0.20 46.30 - 12.10 - - 0.80 - - 99.10 BAN19 1.10 79.60 7.20 0.90 2.20 0.90 2.60 - 1.90 0.70 - 2.90 - - 100.00 BAN20 - 63.20 13.70 1.40 1.50 1.30 3.90 - - 11.30 - 3.70 - - 100.00 BAN21 - 56.10 13.60 1.60 3.40 2.50 4.00 - 5.10 11.50 - 2.20 - - 100.00 Table A2-82: Mineral composition of samples for Bankfontein Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM (values presented as wt%) SiteName -Cl) - Cl) cj Cl) Cl) Cl)Cl)t! 'ë Cl)Cl) ï-§ - .-Cl) ECl) . E o-t: i-.ici ::l II)II) cu .Cl) -Cl) cu.cu 0 ë) 0 '1: cu Cl) (ij::l cu (ij "0 >- c.. ......, c.. .c c.. -cu ~'tJa c (ij Ec Cl)~ u a.. II)~ >-u, ëi5 a o ~ 0J: J: -I- BK1 0.80 69.20 - - 4.60 5.50 3.00 - - 14.60 - 2.40 - - 100.10 BK2 - 9.40 14.60 1.40 12.50 38.60 - - 13.10 10.40 - - - - 100.00 BK3 3.50 83.50 - - 2.30 - 8.90 - 0.30 - - 1.40 - - 99.90 A2-51 Table A2-83: Mineral composition of samples for Borehole 1 as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM (values presented as wt%) SiteName -Cl) - Cl)e Cl)~ - Clco '0 'u 'Ë0 .-Cl);: .-co. u - -Cl) E -Cl) .-C.l)Cl)) Cl)-E .;: 'in ::::I I/)I/) co Cl)(/) coc.. Cl) .:.c c.. co ~ E jij::::I ~co jij0 o '0C >- - e jij Cl)e < 0::I: ::I: I-- BH1-1 17.90 38.90 0.60 3.80 1.20 - 25.50 - 8.70 0.20 - 0.90 2.40 - 100.10 BH1-2 27.00 49.00 0.70 1.60 1.90 - 15.10 - 2.10 - - 0.80 2.00 - 100.20 BH1-3 77.50 1.50 2.50 - 2.00 - 5.30 4.00 5.30 - - 0.10 - 1.80 100.00 BH1-4 - 6.70 0.90 4.40 8.20 21.00 35.70 - 1.30 18.80 - 0.50 2.40 - 99.90 BH1-5 - 45.40 18.00 4.70 5.10 3.20 16.60 - 1.20 1.90 - 1.20 2.80 - 100.10 BH1-6 - 39.90 21.00 5.40 4.90 0.70 17.90 - - 3.10 - 1.40 5.60 - 99.90 BH1-7 38.90 34.00 - 0.10 - 0.10 22.10 - 1.60 - - 1.20 1.80 - 99.80 Table A2-84: Mineral composition of samples for Borehole wedge 1 as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM (values presented as wt%) SiteName -Cl) - -Cl) u Cl)'c 'Ë - .- Cl)Cl.) -Cl) Cl)Cl) E Cl)~ Cl) E .;: ï-ii ::::I I/) .-.co '0 'u 0 .;: co (/) c.. Cl) ....c I/) co......, c c.. -co ~Cl) co jij::::I co jijo '0 E>- c.. I/) "0en e >- e jij Cl)0 ~ C < e < 0Do U. ::I: ::I: I-- BHW1-1 68.60 - 0.70 - 0.30 - 16.40 11.60 2.00 - - 0.30 - - 99.90 BHW1-2 60.80 0.70 0.20 0.20 0.90 - 16.50 17.20 2.90 - - 0.40 - - 99.80 BHW1-3 68.80 - 5.50 - 0.60 - 14.00 8.40 2.30 - - 0.40 - - 100.00 BHW1-4 27.20 11.50 5.30 3.80 2.30 0.20 12.50 9.30 27.10 - - 0.50 - 0.20 99.90 BHW1-5 59.10 4.90 5.10 0.40 2.70 - 9.40 8.00 9.50 0.20 - 0.60 - - 99.90 BHW1-6 25.80 53.00 4.90 1.30 3.50 - 3.20 - 4.90 - - 2.30 1.10 - 100.00 BHW1-7 23.10 46.30 13.00 3.00 3.70 - 2.40 - 6.10 - - 1.50 0.90 - 100.00 BHW1-8 17.90 38.50 22.50 4.70 5.40 - 1.80 - 6.20 0.40 - 1.60 0.90 - 99.90 BHW1-9 11.50 55.20 14.60 2.80 5.30 - 2.30 - 5.60 - - 1.20 1.30 - 99.80 BHW1-10 52.80 31.80 0.60 0.30 0.60 0.10 8.30 - 4.10 - - 0.70 0.70 - 100.00 BHW1-11 17.20 52.70 - 0.20 - 0.10 16.00 11.40 1.60 - - 0.70 - - 99.90 A2-52 I BHW1-12 54.80 17.10 - - - - 15.50 10.80 1.10 0.10 - 0.50 - - 99.90 I Table A2-85: Mineral composition of samples for Borehole wedge 2 as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM (values presented as wt%) SiteName -Q) - -Q) - cjQ) - Q) Q)'ë: 'Ë Q) Q)Q) E Q)E .;: ë-ii :s I/)ns :;:;~ Q)ns ë5 'u 0 .;: :;:; en Q) -Q) ..Q I/) ns (ij a:s ~ns (ij ë5 - ns>- Cl.Cl. "C ..Q C>l-. -cnsI/) (-ij EQ) 0CJ C 0. « - LI.. en a e « :I: :I: -I-- BHW2-1 61.70 - 0.40 0.10 1.10 - 29.10 - 2.90 - - 0.30 4.50 - 100.10 BHW2-2 25.30 47.20 - 1.40 1.90 - 15.50 - 5.70 0.20 - 1.10 1.60 - 99.90 BHW2-3 12.10 52.20 - 1.40 6.00 - 5.80 8.70 13.40 - - 0.40 - - 100.00 BHW2-4 40.50 17.50 - 0.50 1.20 - 18.20 16.70 4.40 - - 0.90 - - 99.90 BHW2-5 50.20 0.50 2.50 0.80 3.20 - 15.30 14.20 11.40 - - 0.40 - 1.60 100.10 BHW2-6 30.70 52.80 2.50 0.70 2.10 - 3.20 - 5.30 - - 1.60 0.80 - 99.70 BHW2-7 14.60 44.60 24.10 4.80 1.90 - 3.70 - 4.40 - - 0.70 1.20 - 100.00 BHW2-8 - 20.00 38.30 5.90 11.80 - 2.00 - 17.70 2.90 - 0.70 0.70 - 100.00 BHW2-9 13.30 66.80 0.30 0.60 0.20 0.10 13.80 - 2.60 - - 1.60 0.80 - 100.10 Table A2-86: Mineral composition of samples for Borehole wedge 3 as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM (values presented as wt%) SiteName ~Q) - -Q) - cj- Q) Q) Q)Q)e Q) 'Ë Q) Q)~ Q) :Es I/) :-;:;ns 'u 0 .;: :;:; eEn .-;: ë-ii I/) ns Q) nsë5 Q) ..Q Cl. ~ (ij:s ns (ij ns0 >- Cl.Cl. ...., -ns« I/) "eCn :e >- «c (ij Ea Q)~ 0CJ C 0. -LI.. (!) (!) :I: :I: I-- BHW3-1 80.20 - 0.50 - 0.20 - 14.80 2.30 1.60 - - 0.40 - - 100.00 BHW3-2 6.70 26.40 8.40 1.70 18.30 - 17.30 - 18.50 0.50 - 1.60 0.60 - 100.00 BHW3-3 54.40 - 0.20 2.10 2.20 - 22.60 - 17.10 - - 0.30 0.90 - 99.80 BHW3-4 15.40 46.10 5.10 3.20 8.20 - 10.90 - 8.60 - - 0.60 1.90 - 100.00 BHW3-5 21.60 33.80 0.60 3.40 0.70 - 14.60 13.50 10.80 - - 0.90 - - 99.90 BHW3-6 51.80 2.00 11.30 0.30 0.10 - 12.70 18.20 3.10 - - 0.30 - - 99.80 BHW3-7 34.30 - 6.10 7.60 1.70 0.20 11.20 - 32.70 - - 0.20 0.60 5.30 99.90 A2-53 BHW3-8 8.20 28.60 6.00 0.90 18.20 - 17.90 - 17.80 - - 1.50 0.70 - 99.80 BHW3-9 40.80 25.60 - 0.40 0.20 - 17.80 12.10 2.30 - - 0.80 - - 100.00 BHW3-10 64.10 9.80 - 0.50 1.40 - 18.20 - 3.80 - - 0.90 1.30 - 100.00 BHW3-11 15.70 60.10 4.10 1.70 3.80 2.00 7.10 - 2.30 - - 2.00 1.20 - 100.00 BHW3-12 8.40 48.00 14.40 4.10 6.60 2.40 5.40 - 8.20 - - 1.30 1.10 - 99.90 BHW3-13 3.20 57.40 10.10 2.60 5.20 4.20 13.20 - 1.20 - - 1.50 1.30 - 99.90 BHW3-14 42.40 36.00 - - 0.30 - 10.60 8.10 2.10 - - 0.50 - - 100.00 - ----- --- - - - Table A2-87: Mineral composition of samples for Borehole wedge 4 as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM (values presented as wt%) SiteName Cl) -Cl) cj~ - Cl)oE .-. Cl) Cl)Cl) E Cl)~ e Cl) Cl)Ou Cl) E 0-;: ë-ii ::::l III ..en ..c III - Q. ......, ..c < III " - (ij Cl)0 0 0.. LI.. en (3 e>- c< :::t: :::t: -0I- BHW4-1 19.30 45.90 2.60 2.30 5.60 - 14.60 - 7.30 - - 0.90 1.50 - 100.00 BHW4-2 33.90 19.00 0.20 1.70 2.10 0.10 12.90 12.50 16.70 - - 0.90 - - 100.00 BHW4-3 13.60 34.10 2.00 1.10 13.40 - 17.70 - 16.20 - - 0.90 0.90 - 99.90 BHW4-4 49.10 21.80 0.10 - 1.70 - 10.40 9.30 6.70 - - 0.70 - - 99.80 BHW4-5 78.30 3.20 - - 1.30 - 6.40 5.40 4.70 - - 0.40 - - 99.70 BHW4-6 16.50 56.30 9.20 2.80 1.90 - 7.40 - 2.60 0.40 - 1.50 1.40 - 100.00 BHW4-7 33.90 50.80 2.30 1.40 0.40 - 7.20 - 1.50 - - 1.50 1.00 - 100.00 BHW4-8 22.60 61.00 7.40 2.30 0.70 - 3.00 - 0.80 - - 1.10 1.10 - 100.00 BHW4-9 17.40 52.00 16.10 4.20 2.30 - 3.20 - 0.80 0.80 - 1.80 1.50 - 100.10 BHW4-10 - 29.60 27.40 3.40 14.30 0.50 0.50 - 22.40 - - 0.80 1.00 - 99.90 BHW4-11 53.30 11.10 - - 0.10 - 19.80 13.70 1.30 - - 0.60 - - 99.90 A2-54 Table A2-88: Mineral composition of samples for Borehole wedge 5 as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM (values presented as wt%) SiteName Cl) - -Cl):!::c Cl)~ 'E -Cl)ca 0 ëj 0 .t: .-. c.iCl) -Cl) -Cl) E Cl) Cl)Cl) E .t: ëii :::I 1c/Cf) a1 .Cl) -ca. Ica Cl) .c 1/1:::I ca iii 0 ......, Cl. .c Cl. -ca :!:: E iiia ~ >. «Cl. u1/.1 e"n o e>.0 C Q. «c iii Cl) 0:I: :I: l-- I BHW5-1 19.80 33.30 - 2.20 2.20 0.20 13.50 13.00 14.60 0.10 - 1.00 - - 99.90 I BHW5-2 6.60 38.90 1.30 0.70 17.00 - 11.70 - 22.10 - - 1.10 0.50 - 99.90 BHW5-3 25.30 40.50 - 1.20 1.30 0.10 13.10 12.40 5.10 - - 1.10 - - 100.10 BHW5-4 71.30 3.10 - - - - 14.10 9.20 1.50 - - 0.80 - - 100.00 BHW5-5 68.70 6.20 - - 0.10 - 11.60 7.60 4.50 0.10 - 1.10 - - 99.90 BHW5-6 85.90 0.80 - 0.20 - - 7.30 - 4.90 0.10 - 0.30 0.40 - 99.90 BHW5-7 81.50 1.20 - - 0.10 0.20 7.30 5.00 4.40 - - 0.40 - - 100.10 BHW5-8 30.70 38.00 - 0.40 1.10 - 10.20 9.80 8.80 - - 0.90 - - 99.90 BHW5-9 50.60 22.30 - - - - 18.10 - 7.00 - - 0.70 1.20 - 99.90 BHW5-10 10.40 42.80 2.90 0.80 11.30 3.00 6.80 - 18.60 0.50 - 2.10 0.70 - 99.90 BHW5-11 - 51.20 10.90 3.50 5.40 5.90 8.30 - 1.30 9.90 - 2.00 1.50 - 99.90 BHW5-12 18.30 40.70 18.70 5.70 2.50 1.10 6.40 - 2.30 - - 3.20 1.10 - 100.00 BHW5-13 6.10 53.10 12.50 3.00 4.80 3.10 12.80 - 0.40 - - 2.50 1.60 - 99.90 BHW5-14 30.40 48.50 0.30 0.30 0.10 - 9.70 8.00 2.00 - - 0.60 - - 99.90 BHW5-15 39.30 38.90 - - - - 11.20 8.40 1.30 - - 0.60 - - 99.70 -------------- - - Table A2-89: Mineral composition of samples for Delmas Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM (values presented as wt%) SiteName -Cl) - -Cl) - .-. c.i - -Cl) E .-Cl.)Cl) Cl) Ic Cl) 'E Cl) Cl)~ Cl) E .t: ëii :::I 1ëj .c 1/1 c/a1 Cl) caca 0 0 .t: Cf) Cl):::I ca iii 0 caCl. ......, Cl. Cl. ca :!:: E iiia ~ >. " .c -« u1/.1 en e o>.0 C Q. «c iii Cl) 0:I: :I: -I- DEL1 22.40 63.80 0.40 1.30 0.50 0.20 8.30 - 1.10 - - 1.20 0.80 - 100.00 DEL2 7.50 48.60 10.50 1.70 5.30 2.00 10.30 - 11.60 - - 1.30 1.20 - 100.00 DEL4 - 0.80 8.80 0.60 16.30 2.40 3.70 - 57.70 8.90 - 0.40 0.40 - 100.00 A2-55 DEL5 - 18.30 16.50 1.80 10.00 11.70 11.30 - 21.60 6.40 - 1.20 1.20 - 100.00 DELG 22.20 65.10 0.40 0.60 1.40 0.20 3.90 4.20 0.80 - - 1.20 - - 100.00 DEL7 - 42.20 24.40 1.20 1.60 5.50 9.20 - - 5.80 6.40 2.10 1.70 - 100.10 DEL8 - 7.20 5.30 1.40 37.10 0.90 1.50 - 42.30 3.80 - 0.30 0.20 - 100.00 DEL9 - 9.90 36.50 4.80 10.10 15.30 4.50 - 12.10 5.20 - 0.30 1.30 - 100.00 DEL10 3.90 54.60 12.40 2.40 1.40 3.00 13.20 - - - 5.50 2.30 1.20 - 99.90 DEL11 - - 7.90 5.60 3.60 29.20 1.30 - - 36.70 12.30 1.70 1.80 - 100.10 DEL12 0.30 24.40 28.60 1.50 13.20 5.90 11.10 - 8.70 4.20 - 1.30 0.70 - 99.90 DEL13 12.80 22.90 6.40 1.70 10.60 - 30.80 - 2.90 0.80 - 9.80 1.20 - 99.90 DEL14 2.20 58.90 8.70 3.80 3.90 2.10 16.00 - 2.00 - - 1.70 0.80 - 100.10 DEL15 - 3.20 16.90 2.70 24.20 6.60 22.70 - 13.20 8.40 - 1.20 0.90 - 100.00 DEL16 - 57.50 12.80 3.50 6.10 0.90 11.90 - 1.70 1.70 - 3.20 0.70 - 100.00 DEL17 - 16.60 8.60 2.50 21.90 6.80 11.40 - 18.60 10.70 - 2.20 0.80 - 100.10 Table A2-90: Mineral composition of samples for Douglas Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM (values presented as wt%) SiteName -Cl) - -Cl) - cj - -Cl) E Cl)Cl) Cl) Cl)c Cl)~ 'E Cl)Cl) ;; E .t: 'iii ::::I 1ë3 1/1 n/s1 ;;Cl) -nsns '0 0 -c ns fn Cl) ..Q Cl. ns ~ E '(ij ::::I ns '(ij '0 ->- Cl. ..QCl. -1/1 '0 >- C '(ij Cl) 0CJ ~ CJ C D.. « - u. en a e « J: J: -I- DOU1 39.60 51.10 - - 0.40 0.10 6.10 - 0.90 - - 1.70 0.10 - 100.00 DOU2 14.60 52.70 13.20 1.80 5.30 - 3.30 - 7.40 - - 1.70 - - 100.00 DOU3 17.60 69.60 1.50 0.90 0.90 - 4.60 - - - 2.50 2.40 - - 100.00 DOU4 70.30 8.10 12.50 2.00 0.20 - 4.20 - 1.70 - - 0.90 - 0.10 100.00 DOUS 39.50 47.80 - - 0.50 0.10 9.20 - 1.20 - - 1.40 0.20 - 99.90 DOU6 8.10 53.90 18.90 3.30 7.40 - 5.00 - 1.30 0.70 - 1.40 - - 100.00 DOU7 16.70 74.70 0.60 0.40 0.40 - 4.70 - 0.90 - - 1.60 0.10 - 100.10 DOU8 - 5.30 11.90 1.40 27.20 0.40 0.40 - 41.70 11.20 - 0.50 - - 100.00 DOU9 3.40 34.70 29.00 7.10 6.90 9.00 0.50 - 8.40 0.30 - 0.70 - - 100.00 DOU10 5.50 57.00 7.80 2.60 6.00 1.20 5.50 - 13.00 - - 1.30 - - 99.90 DOU11 20.40 63.20 - 0.60 0.20 0.90 6.10 3.90 3.40 - - 1.20 - - 99.90 A2-56 DOU12 8.20 63.00 0.60 1.00 - 0.10 14.90 9.00 2.00 - - 1.00 - - 99.80 DOU13 13.20 36.50 30.30 5.60 3.60 3.60 2.20 - 4.00 - - 1.00 - - 100.00 DOU14 15.50 51.00 9.90 2.20 5.20 1.70 4.40 - 8.20 - - 1.90 - - 100.00 DOU15 26.70 58.00 - 0.40 2.30 0.20 5.00 2.80 3.30 - - 1.40 - - 100.10 DOU16 38.40 43.50 - 0.20 0.10 0.20 9.20 5.50 1.90 - - 1.20 - - 100.20 DOU17 25.50 43.30 0.40 1.60 0.30 - 15.10 8.70 4.00 - - 1.00 - - 99.90 DOU18 26.60 38.90 - - 7.80 - 15.50 - 9.80 - - 1.10 - - 99.70 DOU19 55.00 16.30 - 0.60 0.80 0.10 13.20 10.40 2.90 - - 0.50 - - 99.80 DOU20 32.20 51.70 - - 0.20 0.20 7.70 4.60 2.40 - - 1.20 - - 100.20 DOU21 47.70 4.10 - - 7.40 0.40 6.60 4.40 29.10 - - 0.50 - - 100.20 DOU22 - 0.9 8.9 1.1 23 14.4 3.1 - 33.8 14.2 - 0.8 - - 100.20 DOU23 7.50 78.4 3.2 1.3 0.3 0.2 5.1 - 2.3 - - 1.6 - - 99.90 DOU24 16.80 66.4 0.2 1.1 0.1 0.4 7 4.2 2.7 - - 1.2 - - 100.10 DOU25 14.90 76.4 0.7 0.3 0.8 0.2 3.1 - 0.8 - - 2.5 - - 99.70 DOU26 - 68.7 2.3 0.8 2.3 14.4 8 - 2.1 0.5 - 1 - - 100.10 DOU27 0.60 37.3 18.5 - 8.4 2.7 9.9 - 4.6 15.5 - 2.4 - - 99.90 DOU28 0.70 - 16.7 - 13.1 2.6 13.4 - 8.7 40.2 - 4.6 - - 100.00 DOU29 50.70 38.6 - - - - 7.3 - 1.3 - - 1.8 - - 99.70 DOU30 21.40 57 - 0.9 - 0.5 15.9 - 2.8 - - 1.2 0.1 - 99.80 DOU31 7.00 51.6 2.7 0.5 10.8 5.4 10.6 - 9.7 - - 1.7 - - 100.00 DOU32 33.70 55.1 - 0.3 1.4 4.9 2 - 0.4 - - 2.3 - - 100.10 DOU33 13.80 47.8 6.5 2.9 11.8 1 3.8 - 10.5 - - 2 - - 100.10 DOU34 26.20 50.7 - - 0.4 0.1 10.6 6.2 4.5 - - 1.3 - - 100.00 DOU35 37.70 34.8 1.3 3.4 0.8 0.2 7.3 4.5 8.1 - - 2 - - 100.10 DOU36 2.50 83.1 2.7 0.5 2.2 - 6 - 0.4 0.4 - 2.2 - - 100.00 DOU37 18.60 69.2 2 0.5 2 - 4.3 - 1 0.3 - 2.3 - - 100.20 DOU38 28.90 58.8 3.9 1.2 1.2 - 4.3 - - 0.2 - 1.3 - - 99.80 DOU39 49.00 31.4 7.3 2.2 0.4 - 5.8 - 2.2 - - 1.6 - - 99.90 DOU40 18.20 30.3 1.1 - 16.4 - 0.3 - 32.7 - - 0.8 - - 99.80 DOU41 62.70 26.9 1.7 0.7 0.1 - 2 - 3.2 - - 2.7 - - 100.00 ---- A2-57 Table A2-91: Mineral composition of samples for Forzando Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM (values presented as wt%) SiteName -CII - CII cje CII '-E - .-CI.I CIIE -CII CII E CIIt! .t: '-iii :::I -III .CI.ICII IQ -CII IQIQ '0 ï3 0 III:::I (ij '0 'c ti)cIQ.. ....., c.. CII ....cc c.. IQ ~ E (ija IQ >- « III "ti >- «C (ij~ (i) e e CII0 C 0Q. LL J: J: -I- FOR1 18.50 42.80 27.40 5.70 3.10 - - - 0.60 - - 1.00 0.70 - 99.80 FOR2 4.70 41.50 17.70 2.90 6.30 7.30 4.40 - 4.90 - - 9.70 0.60 - 100.00 FOR3 32.80 49.20 0.70 0.40 0.30 0.10 6.20 5.10 3.90 - - 1.20 - - 99.90 FOR4 30.30 54.40 0.50 0.40 0.20 0.10 6.20 5.00 1.30 0.10 - 1.50 - - 100.00 FOR5 10.70 58.00 9.70 1.90 5.30 - 6.20 - 6.80 - - 1.00 0.30 - 99.90 FOR6 22.90 49.60 10.60 2.40 3.50 - 6.10 - 2.50 0.50 - 1.10 0.60 - 99.80 FOR7 56.30 - - - 0.30 - 38.90 - 2.50 - - 0.50 1.30 - 99.80 FOR8 32.80 39.80 0.30 0.50 1.10 - 8.80 5.80 9.80 - - 0.90 - - 99.80 FOR9 17.40 47.90 0.20 0.30 2.70 0.20 5.50 5.20 19.20 0.20 - 1.20 - - 100.00 FOR10 33.50 42.60 - 0.30 1.10 - 5.40 4.40 11.10 - - 1.40 - - 99.80 FOR11 4.40 70.10 13.90 1.50 6.10 - - - 2.70 - - 1.00 - - 99.70 FOR12 17.40 53.60 14.80 3.80 4.20 - 4.10 - 0.80 - - 1.10 - - 99.80 FOR13 58.30 3.70 - - 0.80 - 18.50 14.20 4.00 - - 0.50 - - 100.00 Table A2-92: Mineral composition of samples for Greenside Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM (values presented as wt%) SiteName ~CII - -CII .-. cjCII CII CII- E CII CIIt! c CII 'E CIICII E .t: '-iii :::I III .-.IQ CII IQIQ '0 ï3 0 .t: ti) -IQ CII ..c III ~ (ij a:::I IQ (ij '0 >- «c.. - c.. c.. IQ~ III "ti :e(i) e o>- - EC (ij CII 00 C Q. LL « J: J: -I- GRE1 21.10 36.00 11.70 4.70 3.80 - 4.50 2.50 14.70 - - 0.80 - - 99.80 GRE2 2.50 53.00 9.30 1.90 8.70 4.10 3.50 - 15.90 - - 1.20 - - 100.10 GRE3 1.10 45.10 6.90 0.90 13.10 2.10 2.70 - 26.70 - - 1.40 - 100.00 GRE4 18.70 53.40 13.20 1.00 4.50 1.40 - 6.20 - - 1.70 - - 100.10 GRE5 62.20 7.60 0.20 1.10 2.70 - 9.10 5.60 11.10 - - 0.40 - - 100.00 A2-58 GRE6 27.40 61.00 - - 0.20 0.20 5.40 3.70 0.80 - - 1.40 - - 100.10 GRE7 - 44.10 16.50 0.70 6.20 18.10 3.50 - 5.50 4.00 - 1.30 - - 99.90 GRE8 3.80 53.10 10.10 0.90 4.20 19.70 4.30 - 2.60 - - 1.50 - - 100.20 GRE9 11.70 40.90 26.70 3.20 6.20 1.60 - - 8.30 - - 1.30 - - 99.90 GRE10 49.90 39.80 - - - - 3.60 3.30 1.30 - - 1.80 - - 99.70 GRE11 20.60 65.50 0.70 0.70 0.30 - 9.40 - 0.90 - 1.30 - - 99.40 GRE12 2.20 32.50 27.90 5.50 12.20 0.30 2.40 - 15.80 - - 1.20 - - 100.00 GRE13 24.60 46.60 20.40 3.30 2.00 - 1.30 - - - - 1.70 - - 99.90 GRE14 9.40 23.00 29.40 6.80 12.30 - - - 17.40 - - 1.70 - - 100.00 GRE15 88.30 1.50 1.20 0.40 0.20 - 6.70 - 1.30 - - 0.10 - - 99.70 NGT1 27.00 29.80 0.60 3.30 0.80 0.20 17.30 11.60 8.50 - - 1.00 - - 100.10 NGT2 32.50 49.10 0.30 1.30 0.90 - 13.30 - 1.70 - - 1.00 - - 100.10 NGT3 25.00 54.00 - 0.70 5.10 - 13.30 - 1.20 - - 0.70 - - 100.00 NGT4 20.90 35.70 - 0.70 10.10 - 14.50 - 16.70 - - 0.60 - - 99.20 NGT5 25.00 33.80 0.60 2.30 - - 31.50 - 5.00 - - 1.00 - - 99.20 NGT6 28.20 28.60 0.60 3.50 1.40 - 17.70 11.90 6.90 - - 1.00 - - 99.80 NGT7 38.30 40.60 0.40 1.50 1.60 - 15.30 - 1.50 - - 0.90 - - 100.10 NGT8 38.40 42.10 - 0.90 4.00 - 12.10 - 1.10 - - 1.10 - - 99.70 NGT9 21.00 41.80 0.60 1.10 6.90 - 21.40 - 6.30 - - 0.80 - - 99.90 NGT10 25.00 36.10 0.50 2.20 0.90 0.10 29.50 - 4.50 - - 1.00 - - 99.80 NGT11 26.00 26.90 0.60 3.80 0.90 0.30 16.90 12.30 10.20 - - 1.00 - - 98.90 NGT12 27.40 45.20 0.60 1.70 4.20 - 13.60 - 6.50 0.20 - 0.60 - - 100.00 NGT13 20.80 50.20 1.70 2.00 6.20 - 11.80 - 6.70 - - 0.50 - - 99.90 NGT14 38.00 20.30 - 1.80 3.10 - 31.30 - 4.50 - - 0.80 - - 99.80 NGT15 25.10 32.00 0.60 2.60 - 0.10 32.70 - 5.60 - - 0.90 - - 99.60 -_._- A2-59 Table A2-93: Mineral composition of samples for Kleinkopje Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM (values presented as wt%) SiteName ! Q) .Q-) cj:c!:: Q) .Q-) 'E . Q).Q-.) .- .Q-) E Q) .Q-)~ Q) E .t: 'iii ::::I 1c/a1 ..Q) caca '0 'u 0'0 ..t-:ca iii ca Cl) ..c 1/1 .-::::I >- C- -, C- Q) C- ca :!:: iii0 ~ 1/1CJ C D- e:( LI.. ("i) a..c >- e iii E .-Q)C> 0e:( ::I: ::I: I- KK1 4.30 68.10 6.90 2.70 2.20 5.70 4.10 - 2.70 - - 3.30 - - 100.00 KK2 - 4.10 54.10 1.60 20.00 2.20 - - 17.20 0.80 - - - - 100.00 KK3 4.60 74.40 - 0.60 1.30 9.70 4.20 - 2.00 0.20 - 3.10 - - 100.10 KK4 12.10 60.40 1.20 1.90 0.40 4.80 6.80 4.20 6.30 0.20 - 1.70 - - 100.00 KK5 23.40 66.40 - 0.20 - 0.10 4.30 2.70 1.10 - - 1.80 - - 100.00 KK6 80.30 3.90 - - - - 13.50 - 1.10 0.10 - 0.80 - - 99.70 KK7 12.10 56.00 15.10 1.90 2.40 - 6.80 - 3.40 0.40 - 1.90 - - 100.00 KK8 38.60 42.60 - - - 0.10 10.20 5.90 1.10 - - 1.20 - - 99.70 KK9 - 18.80 30.40 5.90 11.60 1.40 3.70 - 18.40 8.70 - 1.10 - - 100.00 KK10 95.10 0.70 - - - - 2.70 - 1.30 - - - - - 99.80 KK11 14.30 59.00 - 1.70 0.10 0.80 11.00 6.60 5.20 - - 1.20 - - 99.90 KK12 2.30 64.70 9.40 0.80 2.80 5.80 10.10 - 2.50 - - 1.60 - - 100.00 KK13 - - 15.10 1.70 14.20 - - - - 53.20 5.80 9.10 - - 99.10 KK14 36.00 33.90 - - 0.80 0.30 15.90 9.20 1.80 - - 1.60 - - 99.50 KK15 84.40 4.40 - - 0.80 - 8.70 - 1.30 - - 0.30 - - 99.90 KK16 0.50 67.80 - - 5.00 9.20 1.80 - - 13.70 - 2.20 - - 100.20 Table A2-94: Mineral composition of samples for Khutala Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM (values presented as wt%) SiteName .Q-) .Q-) cjQ) Q)Q) E Q) .Q-) ~ e '. Q-) 'E ..Q-.) .- .-E .t: 'iii ::::I 1c/a1 ..u .Q-) ..c 1/1 .- .Q-)Cl) caca '0 0 .t: ca -, C- Q) ..c C- ca E iii::::I ~ca iii '0 C- .-1/1 >- C iii Q) 0 0 CJ C >- D- e:( LI.. "(i) C> C> e:( ::I: ::I: I- KHU1 - 45.70 13.50 2.90 7.80 - 3.30 - 12.80 13.20 - 0.90 - - 100.10 KHU2 - 42.00 19.20 3.60 6.40 2.40 5.00 - 5.60 14.10 - 1.70 - - 100.00 A2-60 KHU3 0.30 28.50 21.00 6.30 3.70 15.20 4.70 - 2.50 16.90 - 0.90 - - 100.00 KHU4 - 91.00 1.30 0.30 0.70 0.30 1.60 - 0.40 2.20 - 2.10 - - 99.90 KHU5 - 75.10 7.60 1.50 3.10 0.60 5.50 - 3.30 0.70 - 2.80 - - 100.20 KHU6 5.70 57.10 16.90 - 7.30 - - - 12.20 - - 0.60 - - 99.80 KHU7 67.20 25.50 - - 0.40 - 3.40 - 2.50 - - 0.80 - - 99.80 KHU8 - 41.60 10.10 0.80 16.00 - 1.50 - 28.20 1.20 - 0.60 - - 100.00 KHU9 0.30 71.20 10.90 1.70 2.80 0.80 4.20 - 0.90 5.40 - 1.90 - - 100.10 KHU10 - 40.80 30.20 6.80 3.40 0.70 3.40 - 2.70 9.90 - 2.00 - - 99.90 KHU11 - 23.50 15.70 3.10 15.50 3.00 4.00 - 27.30 6.30 - 1.60 - - 100.00 KHU12 16.10 38.00 19.80 5.10 2.30 1.30 13.40 - 2.30 - - 1.50 - - 99.80 KHU13 8.10 59.60 12.50 3.40 2.90 1.80 6.40 - 2.90 - - 2.30 - - 99.90 KHU14 16.00 53.10 5.10 1.90 2.70 6.60 12.00 - 0.70 0.20 - 1.50 - - 99.80 KHU15 5.80 48.80 20.50 4.00 3.70 5.40 7.90 - 1.50 0.50 - 1.80 - - 99.90 KHU16 - 33.90 3.20 - 3.00 17.60 9.80 - - 20.40 10.00 1.80 - - 99.70 Table A2-95: Mineral composition of samples for Koornfontein Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM (values presented as wt%) SiteName -Cl) - -Cl) - cj- Cl) - Cl) Cl):~ Cl) Cl)Cl) - E Cl)ï§ E "iii :::I cIIaI +-ca:~ Cl) 'C Cl)ca "0 'u 0 +ca: en Cl) ..Q I"0 'C c. ....., C. '0 :e cII. ca ~ iVa:::I ca iV >- III >- -c i:i) o C iV ECl) 0:::c:: CJ e, . (ij E ..ij.a ft! >. I/) Cl)::.::: u c Q. ct 0LI.. ëi) (3 (!) ct :I: :I: I- KR01 0.80 84.10 - - 2.80 1.80 5.30 - 2.90 - - 2.10 - - 99.80 KR02 0.20 70.00 - - 6.00 2.00 7.70 - 10.00 2.10 - 1.90 - - 99.90 KR03 - 82.00 - - 2.50 2.40 4.40 - 1.80 4.20 - 2.80 - - 100.10 KR04 87.60 7.20 - - 1.20 - 0.90 - 1.60 - - 1.20 - - 99.70 KROS 83.10 6.80 - - 1.80 - 1.20 - 5.10 - - 1.40 - 0.40 99.80 KR06 - 71.30 - - 6.20 - 0.80 - 1.30 16.30 - 3.80 - - 99.70 KR07 - - - - 17.10 3.70 - - 1.90 72.10 - 5.90 - - 100.70 KR08 - 83.60 - - 7.10 - - - 6.60 - - 2.40 - - 99.70 KR09 - 54.90 - - 15.80 - 9.00 - 13.40 5.00 - 1.90 - - 100.00 KR010 - 62.40 - - 7.90 1.70 2.50 - 11.40 11.80 - 2.30 - - 100.00 KR011 - 41.30 - - 12.60 9.80 3.90 - 18.00 12.80 - 1.60 - - 100.00 A2-62 Table A2-97: Mineral composition of samples for Lakeside Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM (values presented as wt%) SiteName - IQ)~ c IV '0 '- Q) cjQ) Q)Q) '-E - Q)u Q) .-. eEn '-;: '.-Q) E Q) Q)i.ii ::::I 1/1 .-.0 c 1/1 IV ~Q) IV-; '0 ';: IV Q) -;::::I Cl. Cl. IV Ea ~IV u >. «Cl. ......, ..c1/1 "C e e>. -c -; Q)Cl ëi) « ::r:: ::r:: -00. LI.. I- LK1 - 8.70 7.50 1.70 19.80 - 1.10 - 58.50 2.50 - - - - 99.80 LK2 12.20 68.40 9.00 0.50 0.80 - 7.30 - 0.60 - - 1.00 - - 99.80 LK3 3.10 52.80 10.60 1,30 10.80 - 3.90 - 15.50 0.90 - 0.80 - - 99.70 LK4 - 26.70 11.20 0.60 20.30 - 2.50 - 34.30 4.30 - - - - 99.90 LK5 10.90 67.30 8.60 1.80 2.60 - 4.40 - 3.20 0.40 - 0.90 - - 100.10 LK6 - 67.90 10.00 1.00 6.30 - - - 8.10 4.50 - 1.30 0.80 - 99.90 LK7 - 34.70 20.00 2.10 13.10 - 0.80 - 20.10 8.20 - 0.70 - - 99.70 Table A2-98: Mineral composition of samples for Leeufontein Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM (values presented as wt%) SiteName ~Q) - -Q) .. cj- - -Q) E Q) .Q)Q)~ C 'u 'E - Q)Q) Q)Q) eEn ';: .'i.i ::::I 1/1 .ci 1/1 -IV -Q) IVIV '0 -; 0 Q)'0 ';: IV :::: Cl. "C ..c Cl. IV ~ E -;a::::I IV u >. «Cl. 1/1 >. e -; Q) 0:::c::: Cl 0. LI.. ëi) (3 e « ::r:: ::r:: I-- LU1 6.70 59.90 11.60 1.20 6,00 - 2.90 - 8.70 0.80 - 1.50 0.70 - 100.00 LU2 1.50 73.20 14.00 1.90 4.00 - 3.90 - - - - 1.30 - - 99.80 LU3 - 3.50 61.00 2.00 8.80 - 0.60 - 7.40 15.90 - 0.70 - - 99.90 LU4 - 42.80 25.00 6.20 1.50 - 1.10 - - 15.10 6.90 0.90 - - 99.50 LUS 14.80 64.30 10.00 3.40 0.20 - 3.70 - 2.40 - - 1.00 - - 99.80 LU6 3.00 45.30 29.40 5.70 7.00 - 0.60 - 7.10 - - 0.90 0.80 - 99.80 LU7 56.40 37.60 0.40 0.30 0.70 - 1.80 - 0.20 - - 2.20 0.20 - 99.80 LU8 44.30 44.50 0.40 0.50 0.70 0.10 5.60 - 0.80 0.20 - 2.70 - - 99.80 LU9 4.70 55.40 20.30 3.80 5.90 - 2.30 - 6.60 - - 0.90 - - 99.90 LU10 9.80 52.70 21.70 2.60 4.80 - 3.50 - 2.60 - - 1.90 - - 99.60 LU11 19.50 58.60 11.80 2.10 2.20 - 2.00 - 1.90 - - 1.80 - - 99.90 A2-63 LU13 - 41.30 25.10 1.80 12.30 - - - 9.40 8.60 - 1.30 - - 99.80 LU14 - 17.80 30.30 6.50 16.30 - 0.40 - 25.10 3.20 - 0.40 - - 100.00 LU15 4.60 65.50 19.00 3.90 2.10 - 2.30 - 0.60 - - 1.50 - - 99.50 LU16 12.90 59.90 9.20 4.10 2.10 - 9.40 - 0.40 0.60 - 1.50 - - 100.10 LU17 0.50 25.30 29.10 4.10 7.80 2.60 2.20 - 10.30 15.80 - 1.80 0.40 - 99.90 LU18 - 64.70 7.10 1.40 3.10 - 3.40 - - 12.20 2.40 4.60 1.10 - 100.00 LU19 - - 21.70 2.20 25.40 0.30 - - 36.70 12.80 - 0.50 0.50 - 100.10 LU20 - 2.10 24.90 2.40 20.50 - 1.20 - 29.50 18.50 - - 0.50 - 99.60 LU21 22.40 72.70 - 0.30 0.40 - 0.90 - 0.70 - - 2.40 0.20 - 100.00 LU22 7.10 75.40 10.10 1.10 2.20 - 1.50 - - - - 1.50 0.80 - 99.70 LU23 2.30 51.60 18.80 3.30 8.90 - - - 13.70 - - 0.80 0.50 - 99.90 LU24 - 9.90 31.40 2.50 10.80 - - - 8.80 35.30 - 1.50 - - 100.20 LU25 - 27.90 18.00 6.60 11.90 1.30 0.80 - 21.00 11.60 - 0.80 - - 99.90 LU26 - - 25.60 4.20 13.60 5.10 - - 14.50 36.00 - 1.00 - - 100.00 LU27 - 79.60 - 0.50 1.80 1.30 8.70 - 0.50 4.80 - 3.20 - - 100.40 LU28 - 61.70 11.70 3.70 5.30 2.30 4.20 - 4.60 4.90 - 1.70 - - 100.10 LU29 - 44.80 9.80 2.00 3.80 1.70 13.40 - - 20.80 - 3.50 - - 99.80 LU30 - - 23.70 4.40 14.80 - - - 24.40 31.10 - 1.50 - - 99.90 LUP1 - 32.20 11.00 0.40 14.50 - 8.60 - 16.70 14.00 - 2.60 - - 100.00 LUP2 - - 26.70 1.00 22.30 0.90 - - 27.90 20.00 - 1.20 - - 100.00 LUP3 - - 65.30 6.10 12.90 - - - 6.70 6.90 - 2.10 - - 100.00 LUP4 - 40.00 - 0.50 8.10 5.90 26.70 - 5.30 11.70 - 1.80 - - 100.00 Table A2-99: Mineral composition of samples for Middelburg Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM (values presented as wt%) Site Name ~QI - -QI cjQI QI -QI E QI QI~ ,: QI 'Ë QI E Cl)QI ';: 'iii ::::J :0::nl -QI nlnl '0 'ij 0 - :-0:: en - .0 Cl)ot:'0 nl ....., c.. QI .0 c.. ëija::::J nl ëij >- «c.. -nl - E~ Cl) "C a >- c: ëij QI0 C Q. LI.. (i) 0(.!) « J: J: -I- M1 20.20 58.40 - 0.40 2.70 - 4.10 - 12.00 - - 2.10 - - 99.90 M2 14.50 58.60 - - 4.90 - 4.50 - 15.00 - - 2.10 - - 99.60 A2-64 M3 80.70 11.30 - - - - 5.90 - 1.50 - - 0.60 - - 100.00 M4 67.60 23.50 0.30 - - - 6.20 - 1.60 - - 0.60 - - 99.80 M5 10.00 53.50 13.70 3.70 3.90 - 5.70 - 7.60 - - 1.90 - - 100.00 M6 12.60 69.70 4.10 1.20 0.90 - 5.60 - 2.00 - - 3.80 - - 99.90 M7 - 57.80 9.90 2.20 2.80 0.70 8.30 - 12.70 3.20 - 2.40 - - 100.00 M8 0.30 59.00 4.20 1.70 6.60 - 4.10 - 17.70 5.00 - 1.40 - - 100.00 M9 1.00 81.40 - 0.80 2.10 4.40 4.30 - 3.20 0.40 - 2.50 - - 100.10 M10 - 88.40 - 0.60 0.40 0.60 6.20 - 1.90 - - 1.80 - - 99.90 M11 21.50 59.20 4.60 0.80 1.60 - 6.50 - 3.60 - - 2.20 - - 100.00 M12 17.00 52.00 11.70 0.70 3.90 - 6.30 - 6.80 - - 1.60 - - 100.00 ' M13 74.90 7.50 5.90 3.00 0.20 - 4.80 - 2.60 - - 0.40 0.70 - 100.00 M14 13.60 67.80 8.80 1.60 1.90 - 3.00 - 1.40 0.40 - 1.20 0.30 - 100.00 M15 0.60 42.70 10.80 1.70 7.60 - 3.20 - 10.00 20.00 - 2.80 0.60 - 100.00 M16 - 33.20 17.10 4.00 10.20 2.60 2.80 - 17.90 10.20 - 1.70 0.40 - 100.10 M17 - 37.80 23.50 2.30 3.10 15.60 6.10 - 1.60 9.10 - 1.00 - - 100.10 M18 20.90 42.20 22.70 3.40 2.80 - 3.30 - 3.60 - - 1.20 - - 100.10 M19 29.40 40.80 1.90 0.60 2.80 - 5.20 - 17.80 - - 1.40 - - 99.90 M20 19.00 41.20 - 0.30 11.10 - 12.00 - 15.50 - - 0.90 - - 100.00 M21 58.60 15.50 - - 0.30 - 14.50 8.60 1.70 - - 0.70 - - 99.90 M22 36.00 33.00 - 0.90 0.60 0.10 14.70 8.60 4.90 0.20 - 0.90 - - 99.90 Table A2-1 00: Mineral composition of samples for Optimum Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM (values presented as wt%) SiteName ~Q) . .Q.) cjQ) Q) Q)Q) E Q) ..e Q)~ . 1~ .QQ) .) .. ..;.::0; E "iii ::I 11/1 cu/1 :0;Q) cucu "0 ·u 0 ..;.: cu CJ) Q) .c .. ~ i6 a::I cu oi6 "0 >. «Co ::: Co .c Co cu E .. 1/1 Q) :::&:: C Q. u, e"n (3 >. e i6 0(!) « :I: :I: l- I OPT1 6.60 32.70 - 0.40 20.30 - 5.10 - 34.10 - - 0.60 - - 99.80 OPT2 - - 18.60 1.50 22.90 - - - - 53.60 - 3.40 - - 100.00 I OPT3 60.40 12.10 - 2.10 - 0.10 14.80 9.10 0.80 - 0.70 - - 100.10 A2-65 OPT4 10.60 58.90 13.10 5.90 4.40 - 3.30 - 1.50 0.80 - 1.40 - - 99.90 OPT5 5.90 66.00 7.60 2.60 7.90 - 7.10 - 2.10 - - 0.90 - - 100.10 OPT6 21.50 66.40 1.00 0.20 2.10 - 6.70 - 0.50 - - 1.50 - - 99.90 OPT7 - 58.50 13.30 1.70 1.80 1.40 11.80 - - - 9.50 1.90 - - 99.90 OPTS 60.80 4.50 6.90 0.40 3.40 - 10.40 - 11.60 0.10 - 0.40 - 1.20 99.70 OPT9 14.70 77.00 - - 2.60 - 3.70 - - - - 2.20 - - 100.20 OPT10 6.70 77.80 3.10 1.60 1.80 1.30 5.40 - - - - 2.00 - - 99.70 OPT11 82.90 7.50 - - 0.50 - 3.90 2.60 2.10 - - 0.40 - - 99.90 OPT12 20.10 67.10 - - 3.10 0.50 5.70 - - - - 4.30 - - 100.80 OPT13 15.30 59.40 9.40 4.20 3.00 - 6.00 - - 0.70 - 2.00 - - 100.00 Table A2-101: Mineral composition of samples for Rietspruit Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM (values presented as wt%) SiteName -QI - -QI .-. u QIQI QI QI E QIt! e QI 'Ë QI E - '-iii ::::I I/)QI .;: I/) cu .-.QI cucu "0 'u 0 ';: cu U) QI .a e. cu :!:: E (ij a::::I cu (ij "0 - e. - e. .a -o >0- I/) "u0; é3 e>0- e (ij QI~ C 0.. - ....., Cl. .Q Cl.Cl. -ta .-.Q) tata ~ E ftjCJ ~ o ct 1/1 "0 >- C ftj Q)C 0Q. LI... en (5 o ct :I: :I: -I- SW1 7.90 46.00 20.00 2.40 7.60 1.80 2.80 - 8.20 - 1.80 0.80 1.40 - 100.70 SW2 22.90 59.10 9.40 1.80 2.00 0.20 2.40 - - - - 1.40 1.10 - 100.30 SW3 21.70 58.10 8.90 1.60 2.50 0.70 3.50 - - - - 1.60 1.30 - 99.90 SW4 15.00 45.00 16.00 3.40 3.10 8.20 3.50 - - 0.50 2.50 1.70 1.00 - 99.90 SW5 17.20 38.60 16.00 3.50 7.30 3.10 4.10 - 8.30 0.40 - 1.10 0.50 - 100.10 SW6 27.00 52.40 6.50 1.70 2.20 0.20 5.80 - 2.00 - - 1.70 0.60 - 100.10 SW7 6.90 49.90 10.90 3.40 5.90 12.50 5.60 - 2.40 - - 1.30 1.20 - 100.00 SW8 6.00 35.50 19.30 4.60 8.10 12.30 5.70 - 5.50 0.60 - 1.20 1.20 - 100.00 SW9 18.00 45.60 9.70 2.80 4.60 7.80 8.50 - 0.70 - - 1.50 0.80 - 100.00 SW10 - 47.50 25.00 2.60 9.00 3.70 2.10 - 7.70 0.60 - 0.90 0.90 - 100.00 ~----- -- --- _._.- Table A2-103: Mineral composition of samples for Tavistock Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM (values presented as wt%) SiteName -Q) - -Q) - .-. c.i Q)Q) Q)t! c Q) E Q)Q) E .-;: '-Q) E Q)iii ::::J 1/1 .-.'0 'u 0 .;: fn Q) .Q 1/1 ta Q) tata ftj::::J ta ftj '0 ta>- ....., Cl. Cl. ta ~.Q E~ o Cl. -CJ ct 1/1 "0 >- c ftj Q) 0C Q. LI... en (5 o ct :I: :I: -I- TAV1A 6.90 33.30 18.40 4.80 8.20 16.10 3.80 - 8.10 - - 0.40 - - 100.00 TAV1B 0.30 40.00 - 4.30 4.30 37.90 6.30 - 0.60 5.90 - 0.60 - - 100.20 TAV1C - 30.20 6.80 2.20 13.50 21.70 2.70 - 18.90 3.50 - 0.60 - - 100.10 TAV2A 6.80 49.80 5.70 3.20 3.20 24.30 4.10 - - - 1.70 1.20 - - 100.00 TAV2B 4.50 46.40 17.10 4.00 4.50 17.00 3.40 - 2.20 - - 0.90 - - 100.00 TAV2C 18.40 53.70 12.30 3.70 3.10 2.10 4.30 - - - - 2.20 - - 99.80 TAV3A 26.30 38.40 13.80 2.70 7.10 1.00 0.50 - 8.90 - - 1.30 - - 100.00 A2-67 TAV3B 23.80 45.70 18.40 2.80 4.40 0.90 1.10 - 1.50 - - 1.50 - - 100.10 TAV3C 7.00 27.10 25.30 3.50 14.30 0.60 - - 21.60 - - 0.50 - - 99.90 TAV4A 27.70 53.80 0.20 0.40 - 0.10 15.30 - 1.10 - - 1.20 0.10 - 99.90 TAV4B 27.70 52.90 - 0.40 0.10 0.10 16.20 - 1.20 - - 1.20 0.10 - 99.90 TAV4C 27.80 53.20 - 0.50 - 0.10 15.80 - 1.10 - - 1.20 0.10 - 99.80 TAV5A 1.10 43.70 2.00 1.60 9.40 13.90 19.90 - 5.10 - - 3.30 - - 100.00 TAV5B 1.60 61.10 1.30 2.30 5.20 8.60 15.70 - 2.20 - - 2.10 - - 100.10 TAV5C 9.10 58.70 - 1.80 5.20 5.90 15.40 - 2.30 0.20 - 1.90 - - 100.50 TAV6A 5.80 39.60 20.20 3.10 8.30 9.40 7.00 - 5.40 - - 1.30 - - 100.10 TAV6B - 53.90 14.50 3.60 5.10 7.90 7.30 - 1.10 5.00 - 1.50 - - 99.90 TAV6C - 50.30 12.80 3.70 6.50 9.20 7.60 - 3.90 4.10 - 1.60 - - 99.70 TAV7A 6.80 41.70 18.40 4.70 8.90 2.50 3.30 - 12.20 - - 1.50 - - 100.00 TAV7C 18.50 70.00 0.80 0.90 1.00 - 6.50 - 0.30 - - 1.90 0.20 - 100.10 Table A2-104: Mineral composition of samples for Union Colliery as determined by normative calculation using SEDNORM (values presented as wt%) SiteName -- «c.. c.. 't:J .0I/) >- -C (ij E